DOKUMEN123.COM

Speedy deletion candidates

Articles

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscernible Unsorted

< June 03	June 05 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Paquito (Mobile Legends: Bang Bang)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obviously fails WP:SIGCOV. no sigcov upon doing before at google search. Most of the sources that were used were trivial. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 21:13, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Video games. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 21:13, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

NHS West Essex

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very non-notable organisation which existed for only a few years, nil non-primary sources cited, article is also full of trivia such as the section on the board which is essentially a directory Elshad (talk) 20:39, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and England. Elshad (talk) 20:39, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Faulknor-class flotilla leader

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Almirante Lynch-class destroyer because the pages seem to heavily WP:OVERLAP with each other, as seen in their two ledes. FaviFake (talk) 20:38, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of hospitals in Richmond upon Thames

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely useless list article, at most will ever list a few articles and has not been updated for more than 4 years. This information can be provided in category format. Elshad (talk) 20:30, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and England. Elshad (talk) 20:30, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:35, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not necessary as as we already have List of hospitals in England. Ajf773 (talk) 21:09, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Warren Hathaway

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one indepth source[1], not the multiple ones required to establish notability. All the other sources seem to be passing mentions, but no further reliable indepth sources as required to establish notability for enwiki. Searches are made somewhat more difficult because there was a New Brunswick lawyer of the same period named Joshua Warren Hathaway (born 1797), but that seems to be a different person. Fram (talk) 18:37, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: History and Canada. Fram (talk) 18:37, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO. Passing mention in sources. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:51, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You have made your vote, please stop removing information from the article, you have made 10+ edits removing paragraphs of text and sources, while advocating to delete it based on too little information. New Yathrib - Fundy Historian (talk) 20:59, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@New Yathrib - Fundy Historian: Perhaps I missed it, but where does it say I cannot remove unsourced content and improve an article that is up for deletion? Magnolia677 (talk) 21:03, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is not one unsourced sentence in the entire article, you are deleting sourced sentences claiming they are not notable enough for his article, then campaigning to delete the article...you can't be doing both. New Yathrib - Fundy Historian (talk) 21:42, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, along with other historical figures like Robert Pagan and Nathan Frink, he was rather prominent in the development of southwestern New Brunswick, Eastport Maine and the Passamaquoddy Bay - settling the region. Not every Penobscot Loyalist who moved to the area is notable enough for an arcticle, we can all agree, but those who went on to become functionally millionaires and owned multiple islands and were prominent in settling the area? Yes. It's also linked in five other articles. New Yathrib - Fundy Historian (talk) 20:31, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Robert Pagan is notable because he has an entry in the Dictionary of Canadian Biography. Nathan Frink is notable because he was a member of the legislative assembly. Unfortunately this article does not meet either of those SNGs. The rest of your points here are largely irrelevant to a deletion discussion -- your best bet would be to try to dredge up more sources to bring to the table. I looked around but didn't find anything at all. MediaKyle (talk) 21:15, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Internal Revenue Code section 1

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A strange article. In some sense, yes, you're going to find information on it, but the same can be said for any part of the USC. Trying to break it up by section with excruciating detail on how the code is organized and such is horribly inappropriate and not how we generally cover laws on Wikipedia. WP:NOPAGE is key here; general information how about federal income tax works in the US can be, should be, and already is at Income tax in the United States. There are hundreds of sections in USC 26, none of which are more or less deserving of a dedicated article. This amounts to nothing more than a dump of one small part of the code, with no secondarily sourced commentary, or clarity of why it's being singled out. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 18:18, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Law, and United States of America. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 18:18, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep on procedural grounds. A nomination on this same subject was just withdrawn hours ago. Detractors do not get infinite successive bites at the apple, and should at least wait a reasonable time before submitting a new AfD. Furthermore, the statement there are various sections of the statute "none of which are more or less deserving of a dedicated article" is astounding. Of course there are more important and less important sections within the law, and this one is self-evidently the most important section, as it is the section that establishes an individual income tax in the United States. BD2412 T 18:26, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It was an improper close by the nominator who decided to withdraw, since I had !voted delete. Rather than go through the hassle of trying to reopen it, I simply renominated, all perfectly kosher. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 19:01, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
If it was an improper withdrawal, then you should have gone through that hassle. Otherwise, what's the point of calling the close improper? The correct procedure at this point would be to close this discussion and take the previous one to WP:DRV. BD2412 T 19:03, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
And you shouldn't have posted an incredibly non-neutral notice at WP:RSL the first time, but hey, c'est la vie. We're here now; let's do this. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 19:13, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I stated the facts. BD2412 T 20:10, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:29, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Pacilli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not seem to meet notability criteria whether measured by WP:GNG or WP:NSPORT and no SIGCOV as far as I can see. BleachPuffin (talk) 18:21, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Italy. BleachPuffin (talk) 18:25, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Italy. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:38, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:43, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

2026 Philippine Senate walkout

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This merge proposal was originally opened on the article's talk page. Following the March 2026 RfC, formal merge discussions are now held at AfD rather than the historical Proposed article mergers process (PAM). I've moved the discussion accordingly per WP:TPO.

Moved from Talk:2026 Philippine Senate walkout § Proposal to create an article titled "2026 Philippine Senate leadership dispute" (Ongoing discussion)

– FaviFake (talk) 17:05, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Proposal to create an article titled "2026 Philippine Senate leadership dispute"

I suggest to consolidate or creating a different Wikipedia article related to the ongoing crisis in the Philippine government through articles such as the Attempts to arrest Ronald dela Rosa, 2026 President of the Senate of the Philippines election, Senate lockdown, the expulsion of Kiko Barzaga from Congress, the subsequent arrest of Senator Jinggoy Estrada or the Surrender of Jinggoy Estrada, the investigations involving Senators leading to their arrests, the 2026 Philippine Senate walkout, the call of the Minority Bloc for the resignation of Senator Alan Peter Cayetano from the Senate Presidency, and many more.

Tagging other editors in this article for opinion: @HueMan1, @Ieditarticles, @Howard the Duck, @Wilson Palacpac III, @CastleFort1, @Chieharumachi, @Hotrodguy84, @Hariboneagle927, @Boud Wiki's Slash (talk) 11:54, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ehhhhhh there's no crisis? Everything could have went into the 20th Congress of the Philippines article. Howard the Duck (talk) 12:15, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I mean there is too many articles, like every event that is happening in the senate always have an article. If not a government crisis maybe an article with a name that consolidates these events happening in the Senate, because this was because and I agree with @CastleFort1 with the rivalry of Duterte-Marcos, from what is happening right now in the Senate, there should be a single article. Maybe a political crisis article would be the name for this events. Wiki's Slash (talk) 12:26, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

20th Congress of the Philippines is where you put all of these. The walkout, Jinggoy and Barzaga does not surpass WP:NEVENT and should be merged somewhere, most likely to that article. Election of presiding officers seem to be notable now. Arrest of Bato was a proper spectacle that needed an article. Impeachment and the ensuing trials have had articles on other countries and we could do that.

A proper political crisis means that government is gridlocked/not existing; the Senate not meeting for a few days does not make a "crisis". Howard the Duck (talk) 12:51, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

if SP Alan Peter Cayetano ended his tenure as Senate President and the chaos might potentially ended, i think an article about his Senate Presidency is a much better option instead. Thewideawake1 (talk) 13:06, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Cayetano had a tumultuous speakership but we didn't have an article about that... Howard the Duck (talk) 13:34, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Senate Presidency of Alan Peter Cayetano is a much better option, it consolidates many articles into one. Wilson Palacpac III (talk) 15:11, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

With the exception of Kiko Barzaga, all other events appear to be related to the Senate. I note that the flood control projects scandal and the Duterte-Marcos rivalry appear to have collided together in this period of time. CastleFort1 (talk) 12:17, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't we just make a contents list? Do we really want to make a million short articles that may not be encyclopedic enough on their own? Ieditarticles (talk) 17:14, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

+1. Just move all of these to 20th Congress of the Philippines save for Bato's arrest, impeachment, and Senate presidential elections. These daughter articles are bordering on the absurd. Howard the Duck (talk) 17:57, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There has to be a separate article that contain the list of this events, merging it with the 20th Congress article would be a heavy-text. Wiki's Slash (talk) 18:32, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

20th Congress of the Philippines barely has prose, it just has loads of tables. We could've lengthened that article's history section instead of having disparate articles people wouldn't be able to find anyway. Howard the Duck (talk) 19:28, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Texas redistricting has a similar occurrence of legislators walking out, and actually even going outside of state to prevent Texas from capturing them to have a quorum. There is no article about a specific legislative mandate for Texas though, so it was mentioned in this article which was the primordial reason why the said legislators fled the state.

The Philippines is more complicated than that though as several issues (Duterte impeachment, Duterte in the ICC, Bato's manhunt, Senate presidentiul elections) are so deeply intertwined. But I won't call this as a "political crisis" yet as we're making stuff up. As stated above, I'd push for this being merged into the 20th Congress of the Philippines, or even the presidency of Bongbong Marcos. Howard the Duck (talk) 19:43, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This proposal seems convoluted. I'd say we merge this article into 20th Congress of the Philippines and merge Surrender of Jinggoy Estrada into Jinggoy Estrada. I oppose merging Attempts to arrest Ronald dela Rosa anywhere else, and it should continue to cover the Senate lockdown. I also support retaining 2026 President of the Senate of the Philippines election as a standalone article. Separate articles for Kiko Barzaga's expulsion and Alan Peter Cayetano's Senate presidency do not appear necessary. These events can be covered in 20th Congress of the Philippines. HueMan1 (talk) 23:21, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I believe there is a crisis now in the Philippine Senate because of the ongoing change of leadership, the Minority bloc has ousted Cayetano, and the senate has elected Gatchalian as Acting President, I believe we can now create a consolidated article because this crisis started when Cayetano assume office in May 11 and now it has been scalated, we need a proper article, please consider. Wiki's Slash (talk) 08:23, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I believe there is a crisis now in the Philippine Senate WP:RS? Howard the Duck (talk) 11:31, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the WP:RS question, I am not relying on my own characterization of the situation. Multiple reliable sources are already describing the events as a crisis, deadlock, impasse, or constitutional crisis.

Associated Press described the situation as a "political impasse" that shut down the Senate for two consecutive days and prevented normal operations.

Reuters described a "legislative deadlock" in the Senate involving competing leadership claims, a boycott of sessions, disputes over authority, and the election of an acting Senate President after a quorum was restored.

GMA News reported that Senate President Alan Peter Cayetano himself warned of a "constitutional crisis" amid the dispute over Senate leadership and control of the chamber.

ABS-CBN News reported former Senator Antonio Trillanes IV accusing the Cayetano-led Senate of creating a "constitutional crisis" following the dela Rosa standoff and Senate actions related to the ICC warrant.

Philstar repeatedly referred to the situation as a deadlock, impasse, and leadership dispute, including:

Senate fails to convene after Cayetano bloc skips session:

https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2026/06/01/2532096/senate-fails-convene-after-cayetano-bloc-skips-session

Chiz breaks deadlock: Quorum declared with 12 senators present:

https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2026/06/03/2532572/chiz-enters-quorum-declared-cayetano-ousted-12-senators-present/amp/

Cayetano's Senate presidency disputed after 12-senator quorum:

https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2026/06/03/2532585/cayetanos-senate-presidency-disputed-after-12-senator-quorum

Additional reporting documenting the broader sequence of events:

Reuters on the dela Rosa standoff, Senate lockdown, and leadership change:

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/philippine-senate-goes-lockdown-protect-former-drugs-war-enforcer-2026-05-11/

AP on the arrest of Jinggoy Estrada and its effect on Senate balance:

https://apnews.com/article/2cd01afbde368ab8edf2bdc2c89d610d

Reuters on the Senate deadlock and subsequent reorganization:

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/philippines-marcos-urges-senate-return-work-gridlock-deepens-ahead-break-2026-06-03/

Given that major national and international news organizations are already using terms such as "impasse", "deadlock", and "constitutional crisis", I do not think describing the ongoing situation as a Senate political crisis is unsupported by reliable sources. The precise article title can be discussed, but the existence of a significant institutional crisis within the Senate is already being recognized and documented by multiple independent sources. Wiki's Slash (talk) 11:45, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Only people who were involved (Cayetano and Trillanes) called this as a "crisis"; in other words, it's self-serving. Other descriptions, such as deadlock or impasse, do not necesarilly merit for it to be a "crisis". This is by the design; the Senate has 24 members, there'd be deadlock if it's tied 12-all (or 11-all, etc.), with no tiebreaking vote. Last 3 references do not help in determining if there is indeed a "crisis". Howard the Duck (talk) 13:26, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to second the proposal. It give us a much more consolidated space to give information to the public and Wikipedia users. Furthermore, it gathers every single event necessary to remove the necessity of creating single page articles that stemmed from the same problem and situation. I do hope that members tagged for their opinions should consider this proposal because it's a much more apparent, clearer, and simpler approach to the ongoing political crisis of the government. WIZ*ONEI 08:04, 3 June 2026 (UTC) — Preceding signed comment added by Wiki's Slash (talk • contribs) [reply]

I propose the creation of a Wikipedia article titled "Draft:2026 Philippine Senate political crisis" Wiki's Slash (talk) 14:04, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Create the draft first Thewideawake1 (talk) 14:57, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It seems clear to me that 20th Congress of the Philippines needs to be expanded, and for now, to serve as the main repository of overviews of the individual incidents. So if we're voting on anything, that's what I vote for, and not for anything else. To me, that suffices as the needed "consolidated space to give information to the public," perhaps better so if placed within an appropriate subhead, which can then perhaps merit a redirect with the same title as that subhead leading to that section. Should (contemporary) history decide that a larger, more cohesive title is called for, then that can be created later. For now, I feel that to create that risks creating a Wikipedia:Too soon situation, given that creating the connections between the incidents may constitute a case of WP:SYNTH. We simply do not know what games all the parties are playing, or whether they are playing it well or fumbling the ball; and we do not know for sure into which pattern the larger narrative will coalesce. As for the individual incidents, I suspect a good number of them will eventually survive notability challenges; I have no problem with them continuing to exist as long as they evolve as history gives them more context. Maybe the situation even merits the creation of more such articles, and about "ancient history" like Avelino v. Cuenco (1949). So yeah, basically, the Wikipedia:Eventualist in me is unbothered by the seeming mess of the moment. - Chieharumachi (talk) 16:10, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I DISAGREE with consolidating all of this into the 20th Congress of the Philippines article. Most Congress articles, including the 19th and earlier ones, do not even use a “History” section to absorb ongoing political developments, with the 14th Congress being more of an exception than the norm. So using the 20th Congress as a catch-all for these Senate events is inconsistent with existing article structure. Per Wikipedia:SUMMARYSTYLE, institutional articles are meant to summarize and link to separate main articles when a topic becomes too large or complex. The current Senate situation already involves multiple connected developments (leadership disputes, quorum issues, impeachment proceedings), which fits better as a standalone crisis article. Putting everything into the Congress page would also unbalance the article and over-focus it on Senate conflict, which goes against Wikipedia:SIZE and the general principle of Wikipedia:NOTPAPER. That’s why a separate article like “Draft:2026 Philippine Senate political crisis” or “2026 Philippine Senate leadership crisis” is more appropriate, with the Congress page only providing a summary. Wiki's Slash (talk) 03:42, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the article count is too much, and that article renaming has become frequent due to subsequent breaking news. I'll just list em all here, along with their former names:

Attempts to arrest Ronald dela Rosa (formerly "2026 Philippine Senate lockdown")
May 2026 President of the Senate of the Philippines election (formerly "2026 President of the Senate of the Philippines election")
Surrender of Jinggoy Estrada (pending new title)
2026 Philippine Senate walkout
Second impeachment of Sara Duterte

And definitely more will soon follow! I'll keep this list updated. — 🍕 Yivan000 ^view_talk 00:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Everyone I have already created a draft titled Draft:2026 Philippine Senate political crisis, mentioning everyone to direct there opinion there, thank you, please consider and maybe let's vote regarding this matter to finally resolve it.

@HueMan1, @Ieditarticles, @Howard the Duck, @Wilson Palacpac III, @CastleFort1, @Chieharumachi, @Hotrodguy84, @Hariboneagle927, @Boud, @CastleFort1, @Ieditarticles, @WIZ*ONEI, @Thewideawake1, @Chieharumachi, @Yivan000 Wiki's Slash (talk) 02:50, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of creating seperate articles about the events in Senate, we should put it into one article. Especially now there's basically two majority who claims they have the committees and leadership. ~2026-33089-57 (talk) 03:44, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support creating a consolidated article, but under a more neutral title.

At this point, the various Senate-related developments—leadership disputes, quorum controversies, walkouts, competing claims over committee control, arrest attempts involving senators, and impeachment-related proceedings—appear increasingly interconnected. From an encyclopedic standpoint, maintaining numerous short articles covering events that stem from the same sequence of developments may not be the most effective approach for readers.

However, I have reservations regarding the use of the term political crisis. Per WP:NPOV and WP:SYNTH, Wikipedia should avoid characterizing the situation as a crisis unless reliable secondary sources have clearly and consistently done so. Otherwise, we risk drawing conclusions that are not yet fully supported by the available sourcing.

As a compromise, I would support the creation of a broader overview article under a more neutral title, such as 2026 Philippine Senate leadership dispute or a similar formulation supported by sources. Such an article could serve as a parent article summarizing the major developments, while clearly notable events (e.g., Senate presidential elections, impeachment proceedings, or major legal controversies) may remain as standalone daughter articles per WP:SUMMARYSTYLE.

This approach would reduce article fragmentation, provide readers with a centralized narrative, and avoid creating multiple overlapping pages that may later require merger discussions. If future reliable sources establish a broader historical narrative or explicitly describe the events as a political crisis, the article can always be renamed or expanded accordingly.

— ~~~~ Batoenonghistoryador (talk) 10:44, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly oppose creating anymore articles, consolidate to 20th Congress of the Philippines article. Agree with developing not just the 20th Congress articles, but all congresses of the Philippines articles. We can also add House developments; for example on the 19th Congress, we can add the quad-comm hearings, 10th Congress the Juetengate, impeachment hearings, etc. We do not have to create articles every time Alan Peter Cayetano goes on Facebook Live. This is ultimately hyper WP:RECENTISM. Wikipedia is WP:NOTNEWS. Howard the Duck (talk) 11:36, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I respectfully disagree. This is not about creating an article "every time Alan Peter Cayetano goes on Facebook Live". The proposed article covers a broader series of interconnected events that have affected the functioning of the Senate, including leadership disputes, the Sara Duterte impeachment, the Senate lockdown, the walkout, quorum disputes, and competing claims of authority. Per WP:SUMMARYSTYLE, the 20th Congress article should summarize these events, not absorb all of them. Otherwise, it risks becoming disproportionately focused on Senate affairs rather than the Congress as a whole. WP:NOTNEWS does not prohibit articles about ongoing events, particularly when they receive sustained coverage from reliable sources such as Reuters, AP, Inquirer, Philstar, GMA, and ABS-CBN. Additionally, there is an ongoing discussion at Propose article talk page, where six editors have already supported the creation of a standalone article and no opposition has been raised there so far. Wiki's Slash (talk) 11:57, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

"Otherwise, it risks becoming disproportionately focused on Senate affairs rather than the Congress as a whole" -- why is this straw man being argued? No one is saying this. The impeachment hearing per se in the House justice committee is a House matter. The first impeachment and quad comm hearings were also a House matter. Who knows what would happen from now until 2028.

Also, why are there two discussions about this? Howard the Duck (talk) 12:07, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I've tagged all the articles involved. Closers should remember to follow the instructions for closing as § Merge and remove those tags once the discussion is over. FaviFake (talk) 17:25, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

only articles 2026 Philippine Senate walkout, and Surrender of Jinggoy Estrada are on the discussions of the merger. The rest of it (Attempts to arrest Ronald dela Rosa, May 2026 President of the Senate of the Philippines election, Alan Peter Cayetano, Kiko Barzaga, President of the Senate of the Philippines and 20th Congress of the Philippines) should not be included on the discussion of mergers because it felt more inaccurate and ridiculous compared to the Senate walkout and surrender of Estrada that the merger discussions on the latter two were heavily discussed instead. Thewideawake1 (talk) 17:43, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

After reading the nomination it seems the nom wants to merge some content from all those pages; is that incorrect? FaviFake (talk) 18:32, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Philippines. Shellwood (talk) 19:44, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
LOL this is as messy as the current state of the Philippine Senate. Can we have a discussion that reverts back to zero (clean slate) instead of copy-pasting everything here? Howard the Duck (talk) 20:23, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merger/consolidation of this article These events are significant not only for the Philippines but even more so for the International Criminal Court and the trial of Rodrigo Duterte. Therefore a separate article is warranted.

I don't think the ICC is affected or cares that a session day of the Philippine Senate was wasted? This is actually a welcome addition to 20th Congress of the Philippines which needs prose so bad. Howard the Duck (talk) 20:59, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Lumatone

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pretty clear LLM creation, typical signs of bulleted lists of bolded entries. Most of the sources are primary or WP:UGC anyway. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 16:19, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Suspected AI-generated articles. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 16:19, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Wiki and blogs used for sourcing, don't help. I can find some mention in publications from the 70s [2], [3], but I don't know if they relate to the subject we're discussing here or not... delete for a lack of sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 17:24, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Those sources both look unrelated. According to the article, the Lumatone keyboard was created in the 1990s. Omphalographer (talk) 19:07, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Koustav Chatterjee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject appears to be a chess grandmaster but does not seem to be notable in any particular way and no SIGCOV since he achieved his grandmaster norm as far as I can see from my BEFORE search. Subject meets criteria 1 of WP:NCHESS in that he is a grandmaster however he doesn't meet any of the other criteria as far as I can see and therefore I don't think he is sufficiently notable. I note that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Manakova in 2005 and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Bagrationi (chess) in 2022 resulted in keep decisions based on their GM status however we are now 21 and 4 years on from these so it should be considered whether we still think being a GM is sufficient to indicate notability given there are thousands in the world. BleachPuffin (talk) 14:47, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and West Bengal. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:22, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Surrender of Jinggoy Estrada

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Jinggoy Estrada because (1) this is not the first time Estrada had been arrested (2001 and 2014 are the other most cited examples), (2) WP:NOTNEWS, and (3) all of this is hyper WP:RECENTISM that can be sufficiently summarized in the main Jinggoy Estrada article. Howard the Duck (talk) 14:42, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Crime, Law, Politics, and Philippines. Howard the Duck (talk) 14:42, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as suggested seems fine, this person has been arrested a few times already. Nothing showing this was much different than other times. Oaktree b (talk) 15:07, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Events-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:21, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Tuff (name)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Tuff (disambiguation) per WP:MERGETEXT and and partially WP:OVERLAP, Tuff (disambiguation) can simply cover the listed people under a separate heading. SonOfYoutubers (talk) 06:09, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related AfD discussions. SonOfYoutubers (talk) 06:09, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There are more than enough entries to warrant a separate article. WP:MERGETEXT is not relevant as a dab page is not a "broader topic"; listing name-holders is just a compromise when there aren't enough entries to justify splitting out. —Xezbeth (talk) 06:33, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Xezbeth (courtesy ping) I disagree, there's only 5 (6, if you include "See also") entries. As an example, Christian (disambiguation) has a "People" heading and has 7 entries (excluding disambiguation entries for specific "versions" of Christian), yet, doesn't have a separate page for Christian (name). I think it'd be more suiting to have a similar "People" heading under Tuff (disambiguation) to encompass these Tuff (name). *post-reply clarification, I refer to "Christian (name)" as literally a page for people with only and only just the name "Christian", as the 7 entries are people of that 'category'; there's no page for Christian (solo name), despite 7 entries fitting that. SonOfYoutubers (talk) 06:49, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

That's a really bad example for you to use, since Christian (given name) and Christian (surname) exist; the 7 entries on the dab page are known only as "Christian". —Xezbeth (talk) 08:14, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Xezbeth Refer to post-reply clarification I added prior to your reply. SonOfYoutubers (talk) 08:42, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nominator's rationale and per their explanation above, doesn't seem excessively long and can fit in the main dab. FaviFake (talk) 15:10, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep to allow the page to be expanded to include information about the prevalence of the name and its origins. If it is merged, it will eventually need to be undone when someone adds more info specific to the name. – Ike Lek (talk) 07:43, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Five versus seven right now seems doable, but since it's already split off, it also merits pondering whether there's WP:POTENTIAL for two things to happen - for more entries to be added to the name list, and for the name article to grow from more of a navigation aid into a set index with more content, like etymology, distribution, etc. --Joy (talk) 11:28, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I'm unclear if WP:BLPGROUP applies. If you have a clear understanding and an educated opinion, please ping me. Bearian (talk) 19:53, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 14:42, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

English in South America

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Markdown syntax, curly quotes, vertical lists, citing sources for information that's not in them, in general a WP:NOLLM violation. ~ A412 ^talk! 14:11, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Language, Suspected AI-generated articles, and South America. ~ A412 ^talk! 14:11, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, G15. Besides the obvious tells, I spot checked a couple refs, which didn't back up the claims they were attached to. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 16:04, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Expand 770

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Article relies almost entirely on primary sources. The only non-primary sources are from Chabad.org which is not a notable news source. Yserbius (talk) 13:56, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related AfD discussions. Yserbius (talk) 13:56, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and New York. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 14:10, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There is some coverage [4], but it seems routine. "This entity won't be expanded", or discussions around the expansion. I don't see WHY it's notable. Sourcing is as explained, some primary, most not really showing notability. Oaktree b (talk) 15:54, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Zuzana Malíková

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to Slovakia at the 2004 Summer Olympics#Athletics. I couldn't find anything on Google search, but this might be the closest to SIGCOV. Corresponding article on Slovak Wikipedia is likewise an unsourced dumping ground. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 13:40, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Sport of athletics, and Slovakia. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 13:40, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

BugHerd

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Typical corporate spam for a software company. The references are the expected deluge of press releases and promo junk recounting their funding rounds and such. Previously declined as a speedy. MediaKyle (talk) 13:33, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Software, and Australia. MediaKyle (talk) 13:33, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of current Philippine city vice mayors

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While this is a commendable project, I'm not sure this would meet WP:NLIST and I'm not aware of any similar articles on vice mayors. JTtheOG (talk) 07:04, 13 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Philippines. JTtheOG (talk) 07:05, 13 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:08, 13 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, probably. Big fan of lists usually, but this is a bridge too far. First, as vice mayors are just vice, second as then this would have to be maintained. Hyperbolick (talk) 08:19, 13 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
No vote, but there are currently 149 cities (and 149 vice mayors), and elections are every three years. This can be possibly maintained up to date with no major issues. Howard the Duck (talk) 18:51, 13 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 22:02, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 01:55, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into List of current Philippine city mayors as a sublist, as an WP:ATD. HueMan1 (talk) 02:44, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any supports for the merger suggested?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:12, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

2026 Women's T20 World Cup group stage

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to 2026 Women's T20 World Cup because: whole page is just a WP:CFORK, no need to have a separate article. Vestrian24Bio 11:38, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Sports, Cricket, United Kingdom, and England. Vestrian24Bio 11:38, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Women-related AfD discussions. Vestrian24Bio 11:41, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:05, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to 2026 Women's T20 World Cup #Group stage as a WP:ATD. This does appear to be a WP:CONTENTFORK. And this target is also more specific rather than just the article. Servite et contribuere (talk) 13:41, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wait - until such time as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Women's T20 World Cup group stage has concluded. I believe a redirect to 2026 Women's T20 World Cup #Group stage will be a consistent approach and I endorse that, but in the (probably unlikely) event that AFD for 2024 Women's T20 World Cup group stage is relisted I do not think that redirection of 2026 Women's T20 World Cup group stage should take place until the other AFD is resolved. BleachPuffin (talk) 14:32, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Chandra Kafle

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The content primarily serves promotional and commercial purposes and lacks significant independent contribution Endrabcwizart (talk) 13:01, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of People-related AfD discussions. Endrabcwizart (talk) 13:01, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Internet, and Nepal. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:09, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE - chandra kafle follow User:Elison Pokhrel on instagram ^[1]

References

^ "Instagram". www.instagram.com. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

Icon (Megadeth album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to Megadeth discography#Compilation albums because the article fails WP:NALBUM. 1 short AllMusic review is not enough to establish notability. Mika1h (talk) 12:41, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and California. Mika1h (talk) 12:41, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect agree, does not pass WP:NALBUM. Orange sticker (talk) 13:21, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Mika and Orange. Only other sources to be found are some scant blog coverage. RaisedArizona (talk) 13:37, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Pet Storey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Brand new company with no evidence of meeting WP:NCORP through significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JTtheOG (talk) 19:59, 17 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and South Africa. Shellwood (talk) 20:09, 17 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:47, 18 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Added some more sources. Seems to have been covered across numerous local major media outlets, and assumedly likely to continue to do so, considering its parent company, and the growing market it's entered. Husskeyy (talk) 10:27, 18 May 2026 (UTC+2)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer (talk) 03:38, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Spar (South Africa) – No relevant/independent evidence beyond from the sales network, the sources presented are merely accounts of the franchise purchases and advertisements. Svartner (talk) 05:51, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Spar (South Africa), as Pet Storey is a brand subsidiary owned by the parent franchise company and does not require a standalone article. VerdictByLogic - Let's Discuss 09:08, 27 May 2026 (UTC) Restored opinion. Geschichte (talk) 14:19, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Reopened per WP:REOPEN, and relisting for more opinions.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 12:21, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per above. FaviFake (talk) 16:43, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

1957 (film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find any reviews during my WP:BEFORE search. Subject fails WP:NFILM Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:17, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Ghana. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:17, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Kyekyeku

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Available sources are mostly routine coverage and interviews, with no in-depth analysis. The subject does not meet NACTOR/NCREATIVE as 1957 (film), in its current form, does not pass NFLIM Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:12, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and Ghana. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:12, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Agnes Sui-Yin Chan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NPROF. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 11:54, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Probably delete. It has proved very difficult to find out enough of her reputation to make a clear judgement. Searching at Google Scholar for AS Chan (or other ways of writing her name) yields nothing of interest, but searching for LT Maloney does show Chan et al. (1993) as having 267 citations -- not nothing, but not a very impressive total either. I don't know how to interpret this, and maybe someone better than I am at searching can do better, but for the moment it doesn't seem that she can be regarded as a notable scientist. Athel cb (talk) 12:24, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Women, Education, Psychology, and Hong Kong. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 12:58, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Aerocancun

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article about an unremarkable short-lived charter airline, unlikely to have any wide coverage. 10mmsocket (talk) 11:09, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Mexico. 10mmsocket (talk) 11:09, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related AfD discussions. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 11:23, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not finding much non mill coverage:
- There's the like of Berman, Dave (20 December 1989). "AeroCancun Starting Monthly Local Flight". The Post-Standard. pp. C-6 & C-7., detailing local routes their opening (although this one briefly touches on the wider operations)
- And then there's a 1990 near air accident by one of their planes reported in a great many papers (Williams, Corey (30 January 1990). "Takeoff aborted as jet's engine fails". Rochester Times-Union. pp. A1 & A8.)

I'm therefore leaning Delete, so far. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 12:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Eisner Award for Best Writer/Artist–Nonfiction

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Eisner Award for Best Writer because there is very little coverage of this award and it fits in the other page. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 11:02, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related AfD discussions. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 11:02, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Comics and animation, Awards, and United States of America. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 11:08, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If you must merge it with another article, the one that makes the most sense is Eisner Award for Best Writer/Artist. Thematthewmurray (talk) 15:33, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Eisner Award for Best Writer/Artist per above. FaviFake (talk) 17:26, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of nurse-politicians

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I want a discussion of this because I am unsure whether the group meets WP:PEOPLELIST, or is rather a WP:CROSSCAT failing WP:NOT. It seems unconstructive to have List of X-politicians for every profession, being that most or all politicians have held a job or profession before entering politics. Could this be better served by a category? Category:Politicians by occupation concentrates on more spectacular combinations where the occupation is perceived as further removed from politics: actor, sportsperson, musician, astronaut - whereas teacher, engineer, jurist or nurse are more traditional entryways to politics. For the record, I clearly lean towards the opinion that this list does fail WP:NOT, but there are probably lots of arguments for both positions. Geschichte (talk) 10:17, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Politics, and Lists. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 10:25, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The relevant criteria is whether or not it meets NLIST. A quick check for possible sources (which I will add) indicates that it does. Rublamb (talk) 12:20, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - interesting well referenced list - passes NLIST. Moondragon21 (talk) 18:42, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Killing of Martin Nitzken Jr.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unlikely to have WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:13, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Events, Law, Police, United States of America, and Kentucky. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 10:18, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This story out of Louisville might get further notice around the country, but it's too soon to tell. It has gotten a mention at USA Today and a Cincinnati outlet. Also the less-regarded New York Post is treating this as a significant story. Note that this police officer could be charged and we have a trial, garnering further coverage. It's easy to see the details of the shooting (naked man, mental health issue, a cop being fired and in real trouble) spurring more reporting.

Avalanche (Timber Falls Adventure Park)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG with very little WP:SIGCOV. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:04, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Amusement parks, Entertainment, and Wisconsin. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 10:22, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Abu al-Hasan al-Karaji

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this biography fails to meet Wikipedia's core criteria under WP:NOTABILITY. The article relies entirely on primary historical documents and medieval polemical texts to highlight the subject as a rare Shafi'i scholar who rejected Ash'arism in his era. While this theological stance is noted in primary records, a comprehensive search yields a complete absence of reliable, independent secondary sources providing detailed, analytical, or comprehensive biographical coverage of Abu al-Hasan al-Karaji. Under WP:PRIMARY and WP:NOTORIGINAL, extracting a historical figure's name from isolated polemic or primary creedal mentions to construct a standalone biographical entry constitutes original research. Because the subject lacks significant, sustained coverage in modern academic historical scholarship, the article should be deleted. Ayaltimo (talk) 18:28, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The page is merely a translation of the page from the Arabic wiki. I did not find any substantial evidence of Karaji denouncing Ash'aris either. But go ahead and delete the page. I've already saved the page in the Internet Archive machine anyways. There are also tons of articles about scholars that have literally lesser sources than this, but hey, go ahead.User:M. Adrian Jurhami (talk) 08:54, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback. Please note that this nomination is not personal, nor is it about theological stances or biases. It is strictly a routine administrative process based on Wikipedia’s core content standards.

As per WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, the existence of other poorly sourced articles does not justify creating new ones that do not meet guidelines. Furthermore, translation from another language edition does not automatically grant a subject notability if the underlying references do not meet the English Wikipedia's strict requirements for independent, modern secondary scholarship (WP:NOTABILITY). Because we both agree that there is a lack of substantial secondary source evidence for a detailed biography, deletion is the standard encyclopedic procedure to maintain site quality. Respectfully, Ayaltimo (talk) 01:21, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of the Arabic Wikipedia, can you contribute their as you do here to correct creeds in that Wikipedia? As many if not most of the scholars that you edited or listed their creeds here as Ash'aris in this Wikipedia such as al-Daraqutni, al-Sulami, Abu Uthman Al-Sabuni, al-Baghawi and others are all listed as "Atharis" in that Arabic Wikipedia since a long time ago. So can you do something to finally fix that?! ~2026-33182-39 (talk) 08:59, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 June 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:47, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Islam, and Iran. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:19, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Wildworld Tour

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCONCERT --wooden superman 09:55, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Music-related AfD discussions. --wooden superman 09:55, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Events-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:09, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Weak merge or redirect. The topic is more likely to be notable in the future, but it currently relies on announcement coverage, and Wikipedia:CRYSTAL applies. Merging this to the main artist page (KATSEYE) until the tour begins and receives independent coverage. Mcrst.sean (talk) 13:58, 19 May 2026 (UTC) [reply]
Weak keep: I think it will be notable this concert tour. Although, the dates has been announced and we should wait if this is will be develop. ROY is WAR Talk! 10:12, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: if merging, the content is better suited to List of Katseye live performances instead of the artist's page. orangesclub 🍊 15:58, 22 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support the comment of orangesclub. Cyanii (talk) 00:14, 24 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify: WP:TOOSOON applies here. The group is popular and this will probably be a notable tour as there will be coverage at each stop that can be used to expand the article, but it doesn't need to be in mainspace right now. MidnightMayhem (talk) 02:54, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with draftifying ~2026-13653-92 (talk) 01:05, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I am also in agreement that this should be draftified rather than fully deleted and we can reopen the discussion for full deletion when the event becomes current and no significant coverage is provided. Michanpyon (talk) 18:12, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 00:40, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Since they have already been on tour and their discography has charted in many countries, I'd say Katseye are notable enough to have an article about their upcoming tour. Gulf of Carpentaria (talk) 00:29, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Have you read WP:NTOUR? --wooden superman 07:39, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 09:23, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Cat-fox

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to pass WP:NSPECIES (given that this animal does not appear to represent a new taxon) or WP:GNG (given that this animal was spotted in 2003, identified in 2006, but was not the subject of WP:SUSTAINED coverage since then). The term "cat-fox" should probably redirect to Corsican wildcat. Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 09:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Organisms. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 09:05, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, though I think part of the article's content might have a place on the Aeromys thomasi article. It was after all pretty widely publicised in the news for a moment and some people might be curious about the subsequent academic debate. Maybe a section titled "Misidentification as carnivore" or something like that. Boylarva99 (talk) 10:45, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Jumping All Over the World Tour

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG, especially since 2 of 3 sources are self-published. Perhaps could be merged into Jumping All Over The World, but would need better sourcing. Mariamnei (talk) 11:49, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Events, Austria, Czech Republic, Germany, Russia, and Switzerland. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:03, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
These kind of concerts always attract media attention. You just need to search better. --Moscow Connection (talk) 18:12, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I did a very quick search and found a review: https://taz.de/Scooter-live/!5178066/. And, as I've said. you just need to search better, you'll find more. --Moscow Connection (talk) 18:19, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer (talk) 14:12, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 04:56, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or at least Merge to the album it supported. Hyperbolick (talk) 08:14, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
There's nothing at all about this tour on Swissdox. The one review found above is impressive, but nothing else in the article is usable and I haven't been able to find anything elsewhere. I am not convinced that notability has been established. The few sentences that are actually relevant can be merged to Jumping All Over the World. Toadspike [Talk] 14:13, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A last relist...if someone can't find more sources, this one's getting merged.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 08:57, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Cleveland Central railway station

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not provide sufficient references and/or citations for what it states. On top of this, the contents of this page could be merged into the better sourced Cleveland railway station page LachlanTansey (talk) 05:10, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 June 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:55, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Stations, Transportation, and Australia. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 09:08, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think there is some merit in keeping pages for former stations that share names with current stations (not withstanding this station was also "West Cleveland" and "Cleveland Central") if they're distinct enough generally (thinking location etc); would also strongly prefer a merge to an outright deletion if the outcome of this discussion was deletion Totallynotarandomalt69 (talk) 12:31, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as ATD to Cleveland railway station, per Nom and Totallynotarandomalt69's secondary preference. There is really no reason to have this poorly sourced article and the single-sourced Cleveland railway station (1897–1960) stub (listed as Start-class) as separate articles. None of them are currently listed on the Queensland Heritage Register. The two would fit nicely in the history section of Cleveland railway station. Note: These are already covered (with images) in Cleveland railway line, so there is some redundant coverage. They could all be merged "back" ("Merge all") into the parent article as an alternative solution. -- Otr500 (talk) 13:53, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Shenlong (spacecraft)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Chinese reusable experimental spacecraft because clearly very overlapping program, Reusable Experimental Spacecraft is redirecting here when it should be there, very old article, this is obviously not "currently in development" since 2007 alongside the CSSHQ which is actually launching. Doeze (talk) 22:29, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Spaceflight, and China. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:10, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 05:09, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 08:52, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Bluetickgeng Development

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Paid puff piece. All sources are explicitly promotional. Wikipedia is not an advertising agency. CSD tag removed multiple times. This could/should be SALTed for good measure. JTtheOG (talk) 08:19, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, Internet, Websites, and Nigeria. JTtheOG (talk) 08:19, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Critically fails WP:ORGCRIT, sources are so promotional that speedy would/should have worked. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:58, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete failed AfC but moved to mainspace anyway, legitimate speedy deletion noms deleted by a TA, several editors have already agreed this fails notability. Orange sticker (talk) 09:44, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nirmala Convent Higher Secondary School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:38, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Madhya Pradesh. Shellwood (talk) 07:49, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Found nothing with SIGCOV in additional searches to suggest standalone notability. BhikhariInformer (talk) 13:06, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 08:16, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Dwipannita Kalita

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP1E, WP:GNG, WP:SUSTAINED, WP:MILPEOPLE. All coverage clusters in a ten-month window in 2025–2026 around one milestone (first female paratrooper from Assam, and the resulting feature on the Femina India Independence Day cover honouring ten women officers). Of nine references, four are to the SSBCrack defence-coaching blog ecosystem, three to regional aggregators, and only two are reliable sources, The Sentinel and Northeast Today (both regional, both covering the same event). The rank of Major does not satisfy WP:MILPEOPLE, and the Paratrooper Badge and Maroon Beret are qualification marks rather than awards conferring notability. Xoonkowa (talk) 20:47, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Military, Medicine, and Assam. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:55, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: WP:BLP1E might not be suitable here as this piece by India Today was published just 2 days before. --SatnaamIN (talk) 00:44, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the find. Two points. First, indiatodayne.in is the India Today Group's Northeast regional bureau, not the national India Today, so it sits in the same regional tier as The Sentinel and Northeast Today already discussed in the nomination. Second, and more importantly, WP:BLP1E turns on the number of distinct events, not the number of articles about one event. This piece covers the same paratrooper-qualification-and-Femina-cover milestone as everything else, and was published within the same 2025–2026 window. WP:SUSTAINED fails on the same grounds, since it requires coverage spread across time triggered by distinct events. Xoonkowa (talk) 17:20, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. BLP1E applies even if there were hundreds of articles in a single News cycle. We are not a news organization. Bearian (talk) 15:00, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 04:05, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 08:16, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron Rubin (entrepreneur)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A startup owner with routine coverage, mostly about the company. Doesn't pass WP:GNG. - The9Man ^Talk 08:04, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and Businesspeople. - The9Man ^Talk 08:04, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:17, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I tried searching online but couldn’t find any proper detailed articles about this person. Most of the coverage is about the company he runs. AarvexSK (talk) 10:46, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 08:15, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Amaha

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A startup with routine coverage. Fails WP:NCORP. - The9Man ^Talk 08:18, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Companies, and Maharashtra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:33, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails WP:NORG / WP:ORGDEPTH per review of available sources. --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:26, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep coverage makes the article look like Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_Crunchbase including basic discussion of funding round and PR releases. Opposec (talk) 00:25, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean by "coverage makes the article look like Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not Crunchbase"? Geschichte (talk) 10:19, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 08:15, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Erik Linder (dancer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This reads like a LinkedIn profile. Biruitorul ^Talk 08:04, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Dance, and United States of America. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:19, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Live Law

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not finding WP:SIGCOV is secondary sources, appears to fail WP:GNG. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 09:21, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Law, Websites, and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:22, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment- Here are two articles, one in a mass distribution newspaper, discussing litigation against them:

Oblivy (talk) 12:59, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. I came to know about it when I was searching for a judgement. And, a Google search on the name "Live Law" leads to their own news on all the pages of google search. It seems to be notable but I wasn't able to figure out another independent sources so as to confirm the notability. Quikguy43 (talk) 15:22, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

These two articles point to a WP:SUSTAINED issue, which is when an article subject only received notability-eligible coverage for a short time. This company's articles get cited, but I'm not seeing coverage of the company outside of that Kerala court dispute. If there's more out there suggest you identify them here and/or add them to the article (and post here to let us know). Oblivy (talk) 00:42, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

yes, I agree. both not deep coverage problem, and not during a prolonged period of time. two fails Mozzcircuit (talk) 08:57, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the coverage is not Sustained and not Deep or original or sigcov. Mozzcircuit (talk) 08:58, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As a lawyer, it has been a reliable source of legal news in India for over a decade. It would be better to expand and improve the article rather than deletion. It is one of the only two prominent legal news portals in India, the other one being Bar and Bench. Ar1201u1 (talk) 18:05, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Draftify as Ar1201u1 points out this is an important site. It has made news in trying to increase access to law. However, it simply does not have the sourcing. I have looked, and I can't find it. If someone can identify relevant sourcing the article will be there for six months, and if not it will be deleted. Seems like the only viable outcome here other than delete. Oblivy (talk) 22:54, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. It is tricky to access sources for news websites as they themselves fill the pages; so search modifiers have to be used in the Google search (this specific search excludes the Live Law's own website. A subject does not become notable because it's reliable and important (WP:USEFUL and WP:Subjective importance). It still needs to be notable on Wikipedia. Babin Mew (talk) 03:27, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:35, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Arlington Elementary School District

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined PROD was replaced by materially better article but there is still not enough to establish notability. AR/12News only cite the school district in the context of other Maricopa Co districts and even then, only as WP:ROUTINE coverage. Other sources do not assert notability. In contest of prod, author cites nonexistent WP:NGOVT policy, which makes me wonder if AI was used. Allan Nonymous (talk) 12:51, 27 May 2026 (UTC) [reply]

This LLM-generated text has been collapsed and should be excluded from assessments of consensus.

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Keep. The article meets WP:NORG through independent, subject-specific coverage. The nomination appears to discount the sources too broadly as routine coverage.
Policy frame: For a school district, the relevant standard is WP:NORG/WP:CORPDEPTH, not the notability guidance for individual schools. The question is whether reliable independent sources address the district directly and in some depth.
Sources analysis:
1. Arizona Auditor General, Arlington Elementary School District Performance Audit (2016) — an independent state audit report devoted entirely to this district. It discusses district operations, finances, transportation, food service, and administration in substantial detail, constituting significant coverage rather than a directory-style mention.
2. The Arizona Republic (Alltucker, Oct 2025) — covers the district's specific test-score outcomes, not merely the district's existence.
3. 12News (Nov 2025) — covers the district's successful 15% M&O override vote with attribution from election results. This is independent local news coverage of a district-specific funding issue.
Calling all county-frame coverage "routine" reads WP:CORPDEPTH too narrowly. These are not mere listings or passing mentions; the sources address the district directly.

On the authorship speculation: WP:NGOVT was simply a mistaken shortcut on my part, acknowledged on my talk page. A typo is not evidence of LLM-generated content. Per WP:AGF and WP:ASPERSIONS, the discussion should focus on the article's sourcing and notability rather than speculation about authorship. Sparks19923 (talk) 15:44, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Was an LLM used to generate this response? Plain clear answer please.

Audits of a school district strike me as extremely routine. Essentially all school districts do them--it's a legal requirement in many places. This does nothing to demonstrate notability.

The test score article mentions Arlington once, in one sentence. This is not substantial. In fact "mere listings or passing mentions" is an extremely good description of this source.

The 12News source is a dead link. I have not further assessed it. M kuhner (talk) 16:34, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Arizona. Allan Nonymous (talk) 12:51, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as notability is not shown, and I don't think it can be. Also, contrary to post above, "is it LLM" is a legitimate question (otherwise our new LLM policy could never be enforced) and I think the answer is fairly clear. M kuhner (talk) 16:37, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education and United States of America. I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 20:36, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Suspected AI-generated articles-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:15, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, revert AI slop Per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, school districts qualify under WP:GEOLAND for presumed notability. However the LLM slop is obvious per above, so the article should be reverted to the pre-slop version which is [5]. Jumpytoo Talk 01:18, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails NSCHOOL, NORG and\or GNG. Reverting to a previous (non-LLM-generated) version, even keeping current sources, does not present multiple significant coverage in reliable and independent sources.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:31, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Becker

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Sources consist of passing expert quotes in crypto news articles and low quality promotional outlets and no reliable independent coverage of the subject herself exists. - The9Man ^Talk 07:29, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Businesspeople, Women, Artificial intelligence, and Israel. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:20, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

See You in Hell, My Darling

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, no WP:SIGCOV. TurboSuperA+_[talk] 07:28, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Film-related AfD discussions. TurboSuperA+_[talk] 07:28, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:21, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I just found Monstrous Women and the Subversion of Patriarchy in Nikos Nikolaidis’s Films Singapore Sling and See You in Hell, My Darling from the book Perceiving Evil: Evil Women and the Feminine, published by BRILL. There's a nonzero chance that there are reliable sources in Greek, so... WhisperToMe (talk) 20:26, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keisuke Ota (footballer, born 1981)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only 1 source for BLP since 2024. The only source is an announcement for retirement. LillaRis87 (talk) 19:29, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. LillaRis87 (talk) 19:29, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:45, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There are a number of sources present in the article on the Japanese Wikipedia. Aneirinn (talk) 20:52, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It would be appreciated if there's source analysis. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 12:38, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Looks notable at face value, but most of the sources are WP:PRIMARY. Among those who are not published by his own employers, [6] is WP:ROUTINE, [7] has no archived version and neither does [8]. Geschichte (talk) 06:03, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 17:58, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources on ja.wiki and WP:COMMONSENSE, over 300 professional appearances. Giant Snowman 18:02, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify The article currently does not meet WP:SIGCOV, however, it seems that the player is well established as a professional athlete for several years WP:COMMONSENSE; perhaps it needs to incubate for a little bit longer so that more sources can be found and cited in accordance with WP:GNG. Blubberypancakes (talk) 17:54, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Since this is a BLP and expectations for sportspeople have hardened I'm going to ask those arguing commonsense to look at sources and argue which ones meet our requirements, rather than relying on ja which I vaguely recall has much less developed notability standards.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:26, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – In addition to his career as a player, he currently works at the University of Central Florida: [9] [10]. Svartner (talk) 13:06, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Karlee Girl

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSINGER: I have considered making an article for her in the past but there is very little meaningful coverage of her in media. Her appearance in Building the Band is pretty small and there isn't any reporting on her beyond listing her as a competitor after which she was pretty quietly eliminated. One song of hers has been trending recently but it hasn't even charted on a national chart. There are more citations needed tags than actual references. orangesclub 🍊 07:01, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and Hawaii. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:23, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Genevieve Jackson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is not WP:INHERITED. Lacks significant independent coverage and falls well short of notability. - The9Man ^Talk 06:54, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related AfD discussions. - The9Man ^Talk 06:54, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Her first few Google reviews all seem to be database-type things (IMDB, Discogs) with the notable exception of a Jackson Family fansite. Nivlac, 1st Viscountess Nivlac (talk) 07:52, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Women-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:54, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Darializa Avila Chevalier

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Candidate for office who does not appear to have done anything else establishing notability. See Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Politicians and judges and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion. CambridgeBayWeather (#1 deranged), Uqaqatigijaa (talk), Huliva 06:04, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, Florida, and New York. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:24, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the notability guidelines linked to by the nominator and the from footnote regarding local politicians: "politician who has received "significant press coverage" has been written about, in depth, independently in multiple news feature articles, by journalists." I believe such coverage is evident in the sources cited in the article. Tiamut (talk) 09:58, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:SIGCOV. So far there have been profiles in The Jacobin and Hell Gate NYC, coverage in multiple articles in the national "paper of record", and even a surprising 10 mentions in Google Scholar results. إيان (talk) 15:12, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NPOL. All of the coverage relates to her campaign or Mamdani's endorsement of her. There is zero WP:SIGCOV from WP:RS outside of that. The only thing that has changed since the first AFD is that Mamdani endorsed her. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EaglesFan37 (talk • contribs) 11:21, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
NPOL is for presumed notability. It does not supersede SIGCOV. There is zero WP:SIGCOV from WP:RS outside of that is clearly wrong per, for example, the sources linked in this comment right above. إيان (talk) 15:43, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Read the part where it says:
Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline.

إيان (talk) 15:46, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@إيان The first source is a Q&A (see Wikipedia:Interviews, while although isn't a policy, does explain how Q&As relate to notability policies). The second is an article related to her candidacy. EaglesFan37 (talk) 16:33, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per إيان. The citations in the article are enough to show significant coverage.BobFromBrockley (talk) 17:51, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ally Lotti

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No demonstration of any notability beyond having Instagram followers and previously dating someone famous - WP:NOTINHERITED. orangesclub 🍊 09:07, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of People-related AfD discussions. orangesclub 🍊 09:07, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Internet, and Pennsylvania. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:26, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Sources 21, 23 and 24 are RS, as are 10 and 12. Seems to be a notable celebrity/Instagram star (not sure how to describe their job), but we have ample coverage. Oaktree b (talk) 13:20, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Don't you think it's a bit harsh to boot the page? Maybe it might just need more RS (even though it already has some) ReelCosmix (talk) 13:53, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Also forgot to mention that notability is based on significant independent coverage, not follower count alone, and there is a bit of coverage beyond that, by the way, for example, the time she got arrested. ReelCosmix (talk) 03:17, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete : per nom. Sources do describe her mainly as ex girlfriend of Juice Wrld. The argument in favor of WP:NOTINHERITED is strong. Chronos.Zx (talk) 04:36, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. The RS (CNN, Guardian, ABC) are about Juice Wrld, so WP:NOTINHERITED. The newer sources are all low-quality and not WP:RSP: The Sun, TMZ, HotNewHipHop, XXL Mag, vladtv.com - these are all trivial mentions which don't establish notability. She's covered appropriately in the main Juice Wrld article. — Arcaist ^(contr ^—talk) 17:41, 24 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - but cut out any mention of the latest boyfriend by name, who has not "signed up" for an invasion of his privacy. Bearian (talk) 13:23, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 00:39, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a fairly straightforward case of NOTINHERITED.-KH-1 (talk) 06:33, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 05:55, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Bibhuti Bhusan Mohanty

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don’t believe the subject of this bio is notable. Neither of the awards he won appear to be notable either. Mccapra (talk) 07:00, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and India. Mccapra (talk) 07:00, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Odisha-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:35, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - He served as a professor and head of the Department of Audio-Visual Communication at the Indian Institute of Mass Communication, which seems to be the best media education institute in India (as per it's lead). Does this help him pass the #5 criterion of WP:NACADEMIC? BhikhariInformer (talk) 13:07, 23 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
- Possibly, though it doesn’t look like a strong case to me. Some more citations of other academics citing his work would help. Mccapra (talk) 15:14, 23 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 16:07, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:11, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Monira Sharmin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable politician. The subject has never won an election. Does not hold any elected office. She was only nominated for women’s reserved seat. The sources do not demonstrate passing WP:GNG. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 05:11, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and Bangladesh. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 05:11, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, and Journalism. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:25, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect: to Jatiya Nari Shakti#Leadership as per WP:ATD-R. She was nominated for a women's reserved seat in parliament, but was later disqualified, so she does not meet WP:NPOL... — Raihanur (talk) 11:19, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:NPOL. Holder of unelected position. Rht bd (talk) 17:03, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Circle (software)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined speedy deletion under WP:A7 no indication of importance, however all references are either marginally reliable (TechCrunch), interviews with the founder or paid advertising.[11]. All content is WP:CORPTRIV and I can't find any sources that show notability per WP:NCORP. The title implies it's a piece of software when it's a company. Orange sticker (talk) 14:14, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Technology, Software, and New York. Orange sticker (talk) 14:14, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: for what it's worth, A7 explicitly does not apply to articles about actual software, which easily could have been a decline reason given the disambiguator, but as this is otherwise written to be a company article that exclusion probably would not actually apply here (it's a moot point, as the decliner instead suggested there are indications of significance, but that merely affects A7 eligibility and does not suggest notability on its own). No formal opinion. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:11, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:11, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:10, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced page on a Max-Planck sub-institute. The page was reduced to the current stub on April 8th due to copyvio, even before that the page had major problems with most of it unsourced and the only 4 sources being self-published. When copyvio was done comment by Jdcooper was entirely copyvio from the institution's own website. needs to be completely rewritten with secondary sources, per WP:RS, WP:N and WP:TNT. I added a PROD May 20 as it was clear no rewrite was going to take place. PROD was removed by Cyclopia with claim invalid rationale, which to me makes no sense. Now the extra work of AfD. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:40, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Education, Astronomy, Physics, and Germany. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:58, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The PROD rationale was Page was reduced to almost nothing (TNT) due to copyvio one month ago. Since there appears to be no interest in replacing it with relevant content, time to complete the TNT. This is invalid because it fails deletion policy as in WP:ATD: that in the short span of one month an article has not been edited is not a reason to delete, let alone to PROD an article. That said, there is some secondary sources coverage in German, e.g. [12]; [13]; googling coverage is quite hard because of course it is swamped by mentions/affiliations. --cyclopia ^speak! 13:06, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect: to one of the Institutes, there is really only discussions of this entity [14] in connection with the larger Max Planck group of entities. Oaktree b (talk) 15:19, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Trivially passes WP:GNG and WP:NORG. MPE's director Reinhard Genzel received the 2020 Nobel Prize in Physics specifically for work conducted at the institute on the supermassive black hole at the Galactic Centre. The article was stubbed for copyvio; the remedy is restoring properly-sourced content, not deletion. Onatic (talk) 22:10, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. When I removed the previous bulk of the article before, it was because it was entirely copyvio and inappropriate. I'm glad some sources have been found above, I'm sure there are others in the literature. I hope this article will expand into what it could be eventually. Jdcooper (talk) 23:29, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Max Planck Institutes or Merge to Max Planck Society (ATD): Definitly has problems noted by Ldm1954. Failed to find significant coverage in reliable and independent sources, so lacks notability for a stand alone article. The two provided sources are passing mention. The BR source is mainly about the eROSITA X-ray telescope, and the World of Physics article also mentions the subject in passing (Hans Böhringer from the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics) twice. There are around 80 such institutes. Many with articles on Wikipedia suffer from a lack of notability (sourcing) like the Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics (no sourcing), Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence (1 primary source), Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine (4 primary only sources), Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen (one primary source), Max Planck Institute for Brain Research (1 primary source), Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (5 primary only), Max Planck Institute for Behavioral Economics (No sources, External link only), Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces (8 primary sources), Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law (zero sources), Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics (1 primary source), and the list goes on. Chopping these back may solve copyvio issues, but not notability issues. AFD is not clean up, BUT this is exactly where we arrive to discuss notability. This is the time to produce proof, that we call a WP:HEY, or get off the proverbial pot. -- Otr500 (talk) 23:55, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Otr500, I have no problems with a Redirect. I agree with your comments. The same as any organisation, company or university department there must be independent coverage that is more than a mention. It does not matter who works or worked at the institutions, notability is not inherited. Neither of the two sources mentioned by @Cyclopia are the type of detailed coverage we require, in fact they both look rather like reproductions of articles/press releases from the institution. As always, policy requires verification. Ldm1954 (talk) 06:30, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:09, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Code of practice for services, public functions and associations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a pretty clear WP:COATRACK. The article nominally claims to be about the EHRC code but then is 98% about the For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers#Subsequent EHRC guidance. Its already covered pretty well at For Women. Either this should be merged in, or alternatively, renamed and rescoped to be about the 2026 update to the definition of sex. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 04:43, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Law, Politics, and United Kingdom. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 04:43, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This code has existed since 2011 and has, for example, been interpreted in multiple judgments in the UK before 2026. [15] It has also been discussed in academic articles. [16] It just so happens that a big part of recent news on the code has centred around the Supreme Court's ruling and that such content was already on Wikipedia before this. Dawkin Verbier (talk) 05:42, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oliver Phommavanh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:PERP for his criminal activity, article created soon after his sentencing. Also fails WP:AUTHOR. LibStar (talk) 02:04, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Crime, and Australia. LibStar (talk) 02:04, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --SatnaamIN (talk) 20:44, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ASUKITE 02:08, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – If he was only an offender, or only an author, I would agree, but it's the fact he is both that makes him notable in my view. Particularly as he targeted a young person. I think the sources are fine.Blackballnz (talk) 23:53, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
How does he meet WP:PERP or WP:AUTHOR? LibStar (talk) 23:12, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
When you get past the news of his offending, there are a number of earlier news reports, such as a profile in the Sydney Morning Herald (behind a paywall). He's also mentioned in a book called Australian Children's Authors. As for WP:PERP, the guidelines say "A person who is known only in connection with a criminal event or trial should not normally be the subject of a separate Wikipedia article if there is an existing article that could incorporate the available encyclopedic material relating to that person." But he's not "known only in connection with a criminal event". If he had only committed the crimes, then he would likely not be notable (sadly, too many people doing that stuff). It's because of the link between the crimes and his work as a children's author that makes him notable (i.e. that's why the media is interested in reporting on him). Also, later on it says "the execution of the crime is unusual", and I think this is true for the same reason. Blackballnz (talk) 00:44, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 04:37, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Čečiškiai

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSETTLEMENT. Coordinates point to the location of "Old cemetery of Čečiškės village" which would explain why the population is listed as 0 in the cited census. –dlthewave ☎ 20:23, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Lithuania. –dlthewave ☎ 20:23, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Depending on wherever it was called as Zekiškiai/Zekiszki during the XVII century, I personally think it is mentioned, but I would need confirmation for that. Respublik (talk) 21:44, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I've added some sources, and the subject meets the two requirements of NSETTLEMENT, in that the village is legally recognized and was populated. With respect to WP:PAGEDECIDE, I'm content that it serves the reader adequately as a short, standalone article; I wouldn't be especially averse to merging the information to the village's parent eldership article if there is one (I haven't searched yet). Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 08:19, 22 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer (talk) 02:41, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 04:36, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Za humny je drak

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and is non-notable in general. Go D. Usopp (talk) 04:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy, Film, and Czech Republic. Go D. Usopp (talk) 04:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sources provided in the Czech version meet WP:GNG. Around 1 in 50 people in Czechoslovakia saw this film in the release window and it continues to be discussed in mainstream media four decades later. C 679 09:24, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per User:Cloudz679, lots of decent sources in the Czech article. Not sure about OP's claim that this film is "non-notable in general" - this opinion doesn't seem to be based on knowledge of the topic or Czech cinema in general. Jdcooper (talk) 18:46, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keshabpur High School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 03:54, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and West Bengal. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 04:26, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Jagriti Hindu Vidyamandir

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails NSCHOOL and GNG Filmssssssssssss (talk) 03:52, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and West Bengal. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 04:27, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Tarasundari Balika Vidyabhaban

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GGN and NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 03:51, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and West Bengal. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 04:28, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Filmssssssssssss You've made a small typo in GNG. Thought you might want to fix it. 🙃 BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 04:32, 4 June 2026 (UTC) [reply]

Sri Ramkrishna Sikshalaya

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 03:50, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and West Bengal. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 04:34, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of hāfu in popular culture

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is almost unreferenced (just three footnotes). None of the refs suggest a list like this merits WP:NLIST. This is just the usual WP:INDISCRIMINATE, MOS:TRIVIA/WP:IPC failure - the kitchen sink WP:ORish collection of all works that the concept of Hāfu appears in, in some cases in passing (as a secondary character etc.). I don't think there is any value in redirecting this to Hāfu#Hāfu_in_popular_culture, which has no context outside a see also list to this, well, list. Surprisingly, this was created as recently as 2022, but it resembles the poor standards of the early years of Wikipedia. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:48, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Fictional elements, Popular culture, and Japan. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:48, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The two non-fiction sources being used in the article are simply on the concept of Hāfu in general, not their depiction in popular culture, and searches are not revealing any sources that would indicate a list like this could pass WP:NLIST. If any actual sources exist that would allow for some prose discussion on the concept, this can simply be added to the main Hāfu article, which is not so long that a split is necessary. As this is nothing more than an unsourced list of examples, there is nothing to merge, and it is not a particularly likely search term that a redirect would be useful. Rorshacma (talk) 14:23, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Tremayne

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was stubbed down to nothing but a lede sentence and then tagged for A7. I am removing the A7 as a misuse of the provision of no credible claim of significance. There was a substantial claim of significance, some of which was unverified, and some of which was attested by unreliable sources. Information that is reported in unreliable sources may be and often is credible, although it is not sufficient to establish notability.

Procedural nomination at this point - Not yet voting Keep or Delete until reviewing the sources. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:08, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Television, and United Kingdom. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:08, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This subject does not enjoy substantial, in depth biographical coverage by unrelated reliable third party sources. This subject fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:NCREATOR. JFHJr (㊟) 04:24, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Robert McClenon, thank you for the procedural, and I apologize for my misuse. It won't happen again. JFHJr (㊟) 04:26, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Here's how it looked before I stubbed it. JFHJr (㊟) 05:04, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

And this is why I stubbed it. JFHJr (㊟) 05:22, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as poorly sourced BLP. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) — Preceding undated comment added 05:07, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Not !voting, just trying to find some potential UK newspaper sources (searching 1970-current). The Guardian. Shorter piece on something he said in Evening Gazette. Manchester Evening News covers his taking a new position. Brief Evening Sentinel bit on a talk he gave. Plenty of other pieces with more passing mentions -- him being quoted regarding a program he was involved with, a program he was involved in the production of being the target of a lawsuit, a tax matter regarding a football team that one of his programs revealed, an article by him in the Guardian, a few brief letters to the editor from him, mention of Roger Allam playing him in a docudrama, etc -- but those are the ones that I find that are substantially about him and might point to notability. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 13:27, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The stub contained at least three reliable sources prior to their questionable removal by a short-lived but good-faith account. Bosley John Bosley (talk) 14:52, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Bosley John Bosley. Bearian (talk) 05:14, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A source analysis would be useful
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde93 (talk) 03:07, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Takane Ōkubo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only significant coverage is on his works. Go D. Usopp (talk) 03:52, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Video games, and Japan. Go D. Usopp (talk) 03:52, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Per nom and WP:MILL. Svartner (talk) 23:56, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

How great is the coverage? With points 3. and 4. of WP:NAUTHOR, a creative can be notable by virtue of the notability of their works. EnjoyLightEnjoyTruth (talk) 15:59, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:44, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Central European Jamboree

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing in the article or my BEFORE suggests this events meets WP:GNG. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:40, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Scouting and Europe. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:40, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Events-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:32, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Cybertron

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not to be confused with the previous deletion here regarding the fictional planet Cybertron, this is a deletion nomination of the DAB page that replaced it. I believe it should simply be a redirect to Transformers, which would mean deleting the DAB. The other DABmentions are extremely minor in comparison. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:12, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Disambiguations. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:12, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/redirect per nom. The other meanings here are minor and can be dealt with through other means. Shooterwalker (talk) 18:41, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Needs more discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:37, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect per nom. The final entry on the list is perhaps the most worthy of being there but it doesn't have an actual article or a reference. Nivlac, 1st Viscountess Nivlac (talk) 08:22, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea Zitolo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page on an Italian-French scientist which fails notability and had masses of fake claims indicating AI hallucinations or worse. After checking sources, I removed 10 of 15 which either did not exist, were irrelevant or routine. These included a claim that he was nominated as a knight in both France and Italy. There were other invalid claims such as that he is a full professor. Going beyond this his h-factor is 45 with 12K cites, but he is one of many on most of them. The only partial exception are two from his PhD in 2015 & 2017 where he is first author. However, his citations/year have started to drop which is not good. Clear fail of WP:NPROF, no WP:SIGCOV after removal of inappropriate claims. Page was PROD'd by Jimjamjoe5 due to lack of academic notability, which was reverted by Cyclopia with a tag of possible vandalism, I guess the sources were not checked. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:14, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Chemistry. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:14, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I didn't tag anything for vandalism. --cyclopia ^speak! 12:56, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Suspected AI-generated articles, France, and Italy. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:56, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Decent citations, but is listed along with many other co-authors in most/all of the papers in Gscholar. The AI slop is a huge red flag that this is PROMO. I don't see a pass at PROF. Oaktree b (talk) 13:10, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not convinced it's (all) AI slop. The article was created back in 2015, and most of the article's content including the claim he was knighted was already in place by August 2022 [17], before the widespread availability of AI text generation ushered in by ChatGPT in November 2022 (indeed, the knighting claim has been in the article since 2017 [18]). This may just be old-skool fake citations by one of the IP authors of the article, which is still absolutely a red flag that the article has likely been edited for promotional purposes. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:59, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I did wonder about fake, which is why I wrote "AI hallucinations or worse" Ldm1954 (talk) 23:30, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Human-produced fanciful descriptions still don't help show notability, red flag as indicated. Oaktree b (talk) 15:08, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Reading the page, I think your interventions really helped in making the tone more neutral. Maybe some AI has been used to rephrase some
sentences over the years, but the page was created as said by @Hemiauchenia a decade ago. I could help in cross-checking some information ensuring notability.
I added the reference to the “full professor habilitation” status that was claimed in the page - it is easy to verify this information on Italian Public Government open access decisions - but it was removed mentioning “Both peacock and inappropriate citation. Only academics who have a full professor position qualify”. In reality, in Europe (especially in France and Italy), the habilitation to full professor is provided after an examination - which does not mean that you need to be necessarily to work as full professor at University. It is the case of many scientists working for public facilities (e.g. synchrotrons) - they can have this “habilitation” (e.g. allowing them to independently supervise PhDs, for example) but not necessarily working for a University as full professor.
Google Scholar also presents the profile with an H-Index of 45 and a 11296 citations (which is very high in terms of performance and scientific impact, and is the strongest metrics for a scientific profile of this kind) and publications appear to be on major journals, such as Nature and JACS - however, Google Scholar sometimes “amplifies” KPIs. It will be better to cross-check this information with more reliable sources, for example with Scopus. Riceboxpoulet (talk) 05:47, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I propose we also consider a comparative approach with other scientific profiles - considering the specificity of this field, it would help. I was looking at Sophie Carenco’s wiky page (e.g. similar employer, similar research topics…) and her metrics are much lower (e.g. ~4030 citations, 40 H-Index). We have to find a way to ensure consistency Riceboxpoulet (talk) 05:56, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Riceboxpoulet, please see WP:WAX. She has 3 peer awards, albeit junior. She could well be nominated for deletion as WP:TOOSOON, but that is tangential to this AfD. Ldm1954 (talk) 08:04, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:35, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, revert the AI-generated edits and move on. ~~Also revert the pre-November 2022 edits about knighthood,~~ seems more like a gorilla case or just plain old promo. --gurkubondinn 10:52, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the knighthood seems to check out, insofar that it happened. Lacks secondary source though, but it is not a hallucination. --gurkubondinn 11:10, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

One of the "cites" (was an WP:ELBODY) was just a case of link rot but had been incorrectly marked with {{failed verification}}. I've fixed it: Diff/1357736132. --gurkubondinn 11:18, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also not sure why this was reverted as "inappropriate citation": Diff/1356682108. It was obviously retrieved by ChatGPT, and these were bare url references, but as far as I can tell, they do support the claims that were sourced to them.

The presidenza.governo.it/onorificenze_araldica/onorificenze/documenti/GU175_08072017.pdf document supports the claim that Sergio Mattarella awarded this knighthood. The document says that this is a decree of some sorts by this Sergio person, and Andrea's name is in the list titled Cavaliere di Gran Croce (which seems to be a part of the Order of Merit of the Italian Republic).

But the other source, some sort of a list of candidates, is something that I agree borders on being PEACOCK in the context that it was used. It can be used as a source for something else, but it's sort of pointlessly promotional to say that he "qualifies" as something he (presumably) currently isn't working as. Lost of people quality for lots of things.

I don't speak Italian though, so I'm relying on Google Translate and I might have missed something. These are also obviously primary sources (and BLPPRIMARY), but I'm not sure that it is correct to say that these are "inappropriate citations", even though proper SECONDARY sources would obviously be preferred. An Italian speaker would probably have better luck than me in digging up a SECONDARY source on this. --gurkubondinn 11:33, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Restored the first one in Diff/1357739814, used {{cite magazine}} and filled out the parameters. --gurkubondinn 11:51, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I've also filled out some more references and fixed some MOS issues. --gurkubondinn 12:05, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Of his hundred or so publications with 2 or more citations, just one has just two authors (and has 16 citations), and there is no single-author publication that I've found. I find it hard to regard him as individually notable. Athel cb (talk) 12:49, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per WP:NPROF. Awards are generic and his citations are mostly co-authoring others' projects. Sinecerely, jocelyn's dance ^talk 16:40, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yusra Ismail

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant independent coverage to support a standalone article. The references are majprly around a single incident, which leans to WP:BIO1E. - The9Man ^Talk 08:02, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of People-related AfD discussions. - The9Man ^Talk 08:02, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Crime, Syria, and Minnesota. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:31, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 16:07, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:32, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and Redirect to Collaboration with the Islamic State#Foreign nationals (add a "United States" subsection). WP:BIO1E applies but there is sourced information suitable for that topic. Jfire (talk) 03:14, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Pop music in Taiwan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pop music in Taiwan has been a stable two-item dabpage linking Hokkien pop and Mandopop since 2013. This has been expanded by User:Heeheemalu into a full article; however, this article makes blatant use of copy-paste with no attribution of elements found said articles. I'd also argue that it WP:CFORKs the content with no real benefit. Recommend to restore the dabpage. 162 etc. (talk) 16:52, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Taiwan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:12, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@162 etc. You mentioned that this article is a WP:CFORK from Hokkien pop and Mandopop but it is not the case if you read the article carefully. Yes, there are some overlaps with the two pages, however, these two pages contain significant information from other countries, e.g. Hong Kong, China, Malaysia, Singapore, etc.

The article Pop music in Taiwan refers to pop music that are specifically produced in Taiwan and/or associated with Taiwan's music industry since Taiwan under Japanese rule - not "since 2013" as stated by you. Therefore, Pop music in Taiwan is definitely NOT a WP:CFORK. WP:CFORK is defined as "a piece of content (such as an inter-wiki object, a page, or a page section) that has the same scope as another piece of content that predated it, essentially covering the same topic." Rather, Pop music in Taiwan is a standalone article that mentions all genres of popular music that originated in Taiwan throughout history, including Campus folk song, Taiwanese hip hop, Taiwanese Indigenous pop music, Hakka popular music and Taiwanese rock. It clearly details the reason(s) behind the emergence of each genre of music in the history of Taiwanese pop music and how this interweaves with the different periods in the island's unique history. None of this information is represented in whole in any other article. Other articles often only contain fragmentations of information pertaining to the topic of that genre, thus not painting the entire landscape of the history and development of the pop music industry in Taiwan.

Furthermore, your statement is inaccurate: this article is NOT a "blatant use of copy-paste". Instead, relevant information were merely extracted from each article and has been paraphrased, so the issue of non-attribution is not existent. Heeheemalu (talk) 02:23, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If extracted paraphrased material did not need referencing, we could do away with the verifiability policy. -- Otr500 (talk) 05:17, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Heeheemalu: 2013 is when this article was created, not when pop music in Taiwan began. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:54, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Metropolitan90 I see, I've misunderstood. However, my previous argument still stands. If this article counts as a WP:CFORK, then every summary style article would count as one too. The purpose of this article is to act as a high-level overview of a specific geographic music industry, which is a recognized and standard practice under WP:SUMMARY.

Regarding Content Forking: This is not a duplicate fork because articles like Hokkien pop and Mandopop are organized by linguistic genres and cover multiple countries (China, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore). This article covers a geographic and historical ecosystem, bringing together distinct genres to paint a complete picture of the island's unique musical timeline. None of those individual pages fully capture this shared cultural context.
Regarding Attribution: @Otr500, I think I may have used the wrong terminology regarding extraction. If any content closely mirrors other pages, it is a licensing issue under WP:COPYWITHIN, not a core verifiability issue. Per WP:ATD, formatting and cleanup issues should be fixed through editing, not article deletion.

Hence, I strongly recommend keeping the article so we can clean up the formatting if there are issues, rather than reducing Taiwan's rich pop music history back to a restrictive two-line disambiguation page. Heeheemalu (talk) 08:43, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:31, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ali (2025 feature film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in WP:NFILM. Didn't find any reviews. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:26, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Bangladesh. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:26, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Mon Je Bojhena

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in WP:NFILM. Found no critical reviews. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:23, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Bangladesh. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:23, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 06:43, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Chokkor 302

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in WP:NFILM. Found only one TBS review...needs another one to meet the minimum requirement of two critical reviews. If anyone can find it, I won't mind withdrawing. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:18, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Bangladesh. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:18, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Makeup (2021 film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in WP:NFILM. Didn't find any critical reviews or anything to consider WP:NFIC. Won't mind withdrawing if someone can find a minimum of two reviews. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:10, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Bangladesh. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:10, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Institute for International Development

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any WP:SIGCOV of this organization. Their financial reporting indicates one full-time employee and continued activity until 2023. Brief non-independent description on page iii of this book. Some database context. May be mentioned in this book, which I was unable to access. No obvious redirect target. Note: not to be confused with the Harvard Institute for International Development. Cheers, Suriname0 (talk) 01:41, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Australia. Suriname0 (talk) 01:41, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:ORG. Unreferenced. LibStar (talk) 01:47, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Mustapha Abdullahi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

CEO and an incumbent of a non-notable state energy commission Other career achievements are not notable or breakthrough. Lorraine Crane (talk) 11:04, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Engineering, and Nigeria. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:49, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Info - Note on soft closure: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd.

Logs: 2018-03 ✗ PROD

--Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:39, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Power Twins (wrestling)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No WP:SIGCOV, appears to fail WP:NSPORT. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 11:59, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Wrestling, and New York. Shellwood (talk) 12:32, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails notability, including NSPORT criteria. Sourced with a CageMatch personal and career data sheet. Could not find significant coverage in reliable and independent sources to be more than a pseudo biography or resume. Not sure where the unsourced "History" content came from, as it was not on onlineworldofwrestling.com or the "External links" entry. -- Otr500 (talk) 00:38, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:38, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

DDB Mudra

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

However this article has existed since 2012, the current version appears promotional. I am also unable to find any significant coverage. CommanderF1 (talk) 12:40, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising, Companies, India, and Maharashtra. CommanderF1 (talk) 12:40, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly promotional article. SamBordoloi (talk) 08:39, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:37, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

OpenAFS

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not entirely sure on this one. All sourcing in the article is primary; there's not even a hint of reliable third-party source. Everything I could find was a passing mention or a how-to guide but this is not my area of expertise so it's possible there is coverage out there and I don't know what I'm looking for. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:06, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Technology, and Software. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:06, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hello HJ,

I'm a contributor for the OpenAFS project and me and our project's core maintainer mmeffie have been committing updates to OpenAFS wikipedia page (albeit slowly, as time permits in our work schedule) to bring OpenAFS wikipedia page up to date.

Apologies for the Infobox edit - I wasn't aware of the rule that external links are prohibited for our Repository.

Our project's main website is https://www.openafs.org

The project is still actively used in enterprise and community, so your request for deleting the wikipedia page did not make sense to me - prompting this reply. Is there perhaps a different area where software projects need to be organized on Wikipedia? OpenAFS is a distributed file system. I do see wikipedia pages for projects like Network_File_System and Ceph_(software) exist that we are seeking inspiration from to make our edits.

I am still new to making edits to wikipedia however, so would like to learn more about what sources you would like me to cite - whether primary, secondary etc (I plan to research the difference for these this week for my own knowledge), so until then I do request that the request for deletion is "reverted?".

Let me know if you have any questions, will be happy to clarify.

Thanks!

-G

@Gsvolt Gsvolt (talk) 21:15, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
We need reliable secondary sources: someone else reporting on you. Geschichte (talk) 06:09, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hello HJ and Geschichte,

I have added a Bibliography section with citations to two books on the topic of OpenAFS which are great secondary sources of information according to: Wikipedia:Identifying_and_using_primary_sources

OpenAFS has been cited in academic papers as well in the past. I plan to include a Papers section soon.

Thanks!

-G

@Gsvolt Gsvolt (talk) 13:14, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP: While the article does need cleanup, and the current list of submitted changes do need some work, OpenAFS is still available and in use. Several Linux distros do include OpenAFS packages (debian/ubuntu, gentoo, arch, etc.). It is a project that has been selected for Google Summer of Code projects. For historical reference, OpenAFS is the open sourced implementation of AFS that was originally developed at CMU and was later marketed by IBM (which opened source it). CheyenneWills (talk) 14:38, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Whether or not it's still in use is not relevant. We need to know if there has been third-party coverage of it to establish its notability. M kuhner (talk) 20:17, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 01:32, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Glasgow Chronology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Egyptian chronology#Alternative chronologies because it is a near-stub that relies on a single fringe source. This was proposed at Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard/Archive_109#Glasgow Chronology, but never acted on. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 19:32, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: History and Egypt. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 19:32, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment my only concern about merging would be that it denies adequate space to discuss the merit (or lack thereof!) in this alternative chronology, so it might make it look like a more valid alternative than it is. On the other hand, the current article has no sourcing for its criticism of the Glasgow chronology. Elemimele (talk) 16:22, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 01:29, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thursday Next

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Crufty rundown of a fictional character which is 90% unsourced, with the remainder sourced to the author's own website. No reason that this can't fit in a few sentences at Jasper Fforde. 162 etc. (talk) 17:39, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:04, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Jasper Fforde for excessive primary sources and no obvious indication of meeting the notability guidelines for fictional characters. Article is almost entirely WP:FANCRUFT and not cited to reliable sources. Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 18:49, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Literature. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:53, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I've noticed a lot of older articles for long-running book series (often children's and/or detective books, compare Jane Turpin) have a character article that acts as something resembling a series article. This article could potentially be reworked into something like Thursday Next (book series), but I'd hesitate to call that a keep !vote as there probably isn't more than a sentence or two of verifiable, non-fancrufty text in this entire article - basically just the lead, really. ScalarFactor (talk) 03:55, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:24, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Successories

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This company does not meet notability guidelines for businesses. A search for new sources showed a lack in WP:SIGCOV. S1mply.dogmom (talk) 23:11, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Products, Websites, and Florida. S1mply.dogmom (talk) 23:11, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: given the stricter sourcing standards for NCORP compared to other topic areas that fall under GNG, that this has been tagged as overly reliant on primary and self-published sources since 2010 may be of note. (No opinion as to whether anything better exists.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:25, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Significant independent coverage exists across multiple reliable sources: a full editorial profile in NBC News/Entrepreneur.com (2013), a Quartz article crediting Successories with originating the demotivational poster internet meme format, a TIME magazine piece on the cultural parody it inspired, a WGN-TV news segment (2024), and a full entry in the International Directory of Company Histories. The company was also publicly traded on NASDAQ (ticker: SCES). Proposed sourced edits addressing these points have been posted on the article Talk page. Disclosing COI as a Successories employee. NeroVincent (talk) 12:55, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The Quartz article appears to be a dead link. The NBC News article is an interview with the former CEO. Yahoo Finance is an aggregator and the article is a press release. Encyclopedia.com is also an aggregator so more insight into the original publisher is needed. The company's website is used several times in your request, as well as Know Your Meme and Today I Found Out - neither of which I would consider "reliable". Kusack Crystal would also be a primary source as well in this case, if I'm not mistaken. S1mply.dogmom (talk) 17:25, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 01:09, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Limbic imprint

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability outside of use in pseudoscientific claims by the Anti-circumcision movement. I could find no WP:MEDRS or WP:PARITY sources that establish notability. I invite others to look and see if I missed some. Suggestions for a suitable redirect target welcome. Guy Macon (talk) 01:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Behavioural science, Medicine, and Psychology. Guy Macon (talk) 01:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a mixture of WP:OR-riddled banal nothingness and pseudoscience. Nothing to indicate there is an actual notable subject, rather than vacuous woo. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:27, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I think it says a lot about this article that a statement about gender differences in the limbic system is sourced to His Brain, Her Brain: How Divinely Designed Differences Can Strengthen Your Marriage. M kuhner (talk) 04:04, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not pass GNG. - Walter Still not in the Epstein Files Ego 04:57, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Files

MeTV Virginia logos

These two files do not meet the WP:THRESHOLD required to be non-free, and should therefore be moved to Commons. JHD0919 (talk) 15:46, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Bounce logos

Bounce TV logos such as these are nothing more than text with simple designs. The "O" in the logo being elongated is not enough for it to pass the WP:THRESHOLD, and I therefore request that these 4 logos be moved to Commons. JHD0919 (talk) 14:50, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo of the Democratic Labour Party (Brazil).svg

Would it be possible for this to be deleted? I already moved it on commons instead via commons:File:Logo of the Democratic Labour Party (Brazil).svg. GuesanLoyalist (talk) 07:02, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep: Why is the logo considered below the TOO for Brazil? c:COM:BRAZIL notes that "the concept of creativity in Brazil is way more strict and exigent than in the United States, and consequently the threshold of originality is considerably higher than the United States". ―Howard • 🌽³³ 08:43, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:WKNX 7 Logo.png

This is literally just white (albeit metallic) text on a yellow background. It does not meet the WP:THRESHOLD required to be non-free, and should therefore be moved to Commons. JHD0919 (talk) 14:46, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:07-17-2016BatonRougeshooting.jpg

This is just a screencap of a video recording. That alone makes it not copyrightable, and it should therefore be moved to Commons. JHD0919 (talk) 15:27, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tartaglia Genshin Impact.jpg

I needed to re-upload another version of this file in a different format at File:Tartaglia Genshin Impact.png. Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 15:42, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Storm Cornaro at it's peak intensity.png

Appears to be a screenshot from a weather map with satellite photo and cloud overlay. Gert7 (talk · contribs) 19:23, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Categories

NEW NOMINATIONS

Category:SpektreWorks aircraft

Propose deleting Category:SpektreWorks aircraft (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Recently created 1-article category. SpektreWorks doesn't even have an article. Gjs238 (talk) 15:20, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Part of an established category tree at Category:Aircraft by manufacturer. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 19:20, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not for every manufacturer it is useful to have a separate subcategory. The article is in lots of aircraft categories anyway. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:30, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Staraction (talk · contribs) 20:56, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nigerian anti-apartheid activists

Propose merging Category:Nigerian anti-apartheid activists to Category:Anti-apartheid activists
Propose merging Category:Swedish anti-apartheid activists to Category:Anti-apartheid activists

Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. underpopulated category ^SMason_Garrison 19:15, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Liechtenstein human rights activists

Propose merging Category:Liechtenstein human rights activists to Category:Liechtenstein activists

Nominator's rationale: Redundant category layer, upmerge for now ^SMason_Garrison 19:10, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Horses in film and television

Propose deleting Category:Horses in film and television (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: We don't bundle "film and television" in categories like this. The category also isn't a candidate for splitting because it is already split between Category:Films about horses and Category:Television series about horses, which are its subcats, and are also already subcats of Category:Horses in popular culture, so there is no purpose in upmerging to that category. Confusingly the category itself contains individual horses that appeared in film and television. The correct categorization for that is Category:Horse actors, which the relevant articles are already categorized into. Otherwise there's a tv special article A Celebration of Horses: The American Saddlebred that is already in Category:Television series about horses. That leaves a film/tv franchise article, Spirit (franchise), and an article for an advertisement that included horses, Surfer (advertisement). Οἶδα (talk) 18:59, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete an unneeded intermediary category.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:45, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the content is already in Category:Horse actors and Category:Horses in popular culture. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:20, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Green Bay Packers Hall of Fame

Propose deleting Category:Green Bay Packers Hall of Fame (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Per WP:OCAWARD. User:Namiba 18:07, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as not an award, but even if it was, it is "a defining characteristic for the large majority of its notable recipients", as it is likely one of the highest honors a Packers player will receive. Note every single member is notable, as they have an article on Wikipedia. Thus it does not meet the criteria listed by the proposer. Being inducted into a hall of fame is one of the highest honors that can be bestowed on a player. Something like only 5% of the team's players have been inducted into the Hall of Fame, they are recognized at a formal induction ceremony that occurs annually, and are placed within the Hall of Fame. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 19:24, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are very limited circumstances under which we allow award categories. I do not believe this is one of them.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:46, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
- Johnpacklambert, are you joking? There's over 50 categories in Category:Sports hall of fame inductees. Maybe this category should get renamed to Category:Green Bay Packers Hall of Fame inductees but otherwise there is a clear and obvious precedent for these categories. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:32, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  - I think we should delete all those categories. Just because lots of categories exist does not mean they are justified.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:34, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    - WP:OCAWARD, as the name notes, covers awards. Induction into a sports hall of fame is not an award on par with the Bart Starr Award, i.e. it isn't some minor recognition. Induction into a sports hall of fame is a prestigious honor that defines a person's career. Can you cite some policy or guidance that supports your opinion? Otherwise these very clearly meet WP:CATEGORY and aren't applicable to WP:OVERCAT. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:55, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    - Also, your comment of There are very limited circumstances under which we allow award categories is completely false and appears to be a creation made up to justify your opinion. See Category:Award winners by subject and all of its sub-categories. Maybe you weren't aware of all of these categories, in which case now you know. Other stuff exists surely doesn't justify anything, but longstanding precedents across multiple genres spanning years and thousands of editors surely do; its called consensus. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:59, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Category:German anti-apartheid activists

Propose merging Category:German anti-apartheid activists to Category:Anti-apartheid activists
Propose merging Category:Gambian anti-apartheid activists to Category:Anti-apartheid activists
Propose merging Category:Belgian anti-apartheid activists to Category:Anti-apartheid activists

Nominator's rationale: Underpopulated category, upmerge for now ^SMason_Garrison 17:39, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep at least the German category, which now has 3 articles. A bit of effort into populating these would be helpful.--User:Namiba 18:13, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome to populating them. Please some good faith, I spent considerable time cleaning up the massive number of categories also created by the same user. ^SMason_Garrison 19:18, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merge these are too narrow. Generally we need at least 4 articles at the absolute minimum to justify a category.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:47, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hasidic feminists

Propose merging Category:Hasidic feminists to Category:Hasidic feminism

Nominator's rationale: upmerge for now, underpopulated category. ^SMason_Garrison 17:35, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pornographic actresses who died by suicide

Propose merging Category:Pornographic actresses who died by suicide to Category:Actors and actresses who died by suicide

Nominator's rationale: Overlapping categories. If not merged, it should be renamed to Pornographic film actresses who died by suicide to follow category naming conventions. ^SMason_Garrison 16:18, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Dual merge also to Category:Female suicides, as a narrow intersection (regardless of the number of articles in the category). Marcocapelle (talk) 16:42, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Dual merge per above. This is intersection with occupation is trivial. Per WP:PETSCAN, there are "enough" articles for Category:Sportspeople who died due to shipwreck at sea. Should we do that too? How about Politicians who died by suicide by drowning in the United States? There are "enough" articles for that one too. Yeah....no. These categories do not require diffusion. Οἶδα (talk) 19:21, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Academics who died by suicide

Propose deleting Category:Academics who died by suicide (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Do we really need to have another Suicides by occupation category? I'm not seeing this as defining... ^SMason_Garrison 16:17, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, trivial intersection. Recreation of an earlier deleted category, see this discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:44, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as trivial. Οἶδα (talk) 19:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Domestic association football leagues by season

Propose renaming Category:1941–42 domestic association football leagues to Category:1941–42 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1942 domestic association football leagues to Category:1942 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1942–43 domestic association football leagues to Category:1942–43 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1943 domestic association football leagues to Category:1943 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1943–44 domestic association football leagues to Category:1943–44 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1944 domestic association football leagues to Category:1944 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1944–45 domestic association football leagues to Category:1944–45 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1945 domestic association football leagues to Category:1945 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1945–46 domestic association football leagues to Category:1945–46 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1946 domestic association football leagues to Category:1946 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1946–47 domestic association football leagues to Category:1946–47 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1947 domestic association football leagues to Category:1947 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1947–48 domestic association football leagues to Category:1947–48 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1948 domestic association football leagues to Category:1948 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1948–49 domestic association football leagues to Category:1948–49 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1949 domestic association football leagues to Category:1949 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1949–50 domestic association football leagues to Category:1949–50 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1950 domestic association football leagues to Category:1950 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1950–51 domestic association football leagues to Category:1950–51 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1951 domestic association football leagues to Category:1951 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1951–52 domestic association football leagues to Category:1951–52 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1952 domestic association football leagues to Category:1952 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1952–53 domestic association football leagues to Category:1952–53 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1953 domestic association football leagues to Category:1953 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1953–54 domestic association football leagues to Category:1953–54 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1954 domestic association football leagues to Category:1954 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1954–55 domestic association football leagues to Category:1954–55 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1955 domestic association football leagues to Category:1955 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1955–56 domestic association football leagues to Category:1955–56 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1956 domestic association football leagues to Category:1956 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1956–57 domestic association football leagues to Category:1956–57 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1957 domestic association football leagues to Category:1957 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1957–58 domestic association football leagues to Category:1957–58 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1958 domestic association football leagues to Category:1958 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1958–59 domestic association football leagues to Category:1958–59 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1959 domestic association football leagues to Category:1959 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1959–60 domestic association football leagues to Category:1959–60 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1960 domestic association football leagues to Category:1960 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1960–61 domestic association football leagues to Category:1960–61 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1961 domestic association football leagues to Category:1961 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1961–62 domestic association football leagues to Category:1961–62 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1962 domestic association football leagues to Category:1962 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1962–63 domestic association football leagues to Category:1962–63 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1963 domestic association football leagues to Category:1963 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1963–64 domestic association football leagues to Category:1963–64 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1964 domestic association football leagues to Category:1964 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1964–65 domestic association football leagues to Category:1964–65 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1965 domestic association football leagues to Category:1965 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1965–66 domestic association football leagues to Category:1965–66 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1966 domestic association football leagues to Category:1966 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1966–67 domestic association football leagues to Category:1966–67 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1967 domestic association football leagues to Category:1967 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1967–68 domestic association football leagues to Category:1967–68 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1968 domestic association football leagues to Category:1968 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1968–69 domestic association football leagues to Category:1968–69 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1969 domestic association football leagues to Category:1969 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1969–70 domestic association football leagues to Category:1969–70 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1970 domestic association football leagues to Category:1970 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1970–71 domestic association football leagues to Category:1970–71 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1971 domestic association football leagues to Category:1971 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1971–72 domestic association football leagues to Category:1971–72 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1972 domestic association football leagues to Category:1972 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1972–73 domestic association football leagues to Category:1972–73 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1973 domestic association football leagues to Category:1973 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1973–74 domestic association football leagues to Category:1973–74 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1974 domestic association football leagues to Category:1974 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1974–75 domestic association football leagues to Category:1974–75 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1975 domestic association football leagues to Category:1975 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1975–76 domestic association football leagues to Category:1975–76 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1976 domestic association football leagues to Category:1976 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1976–77 domestic association football leagues to Category:1976–77 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1977 domestic association football leagues to Category:1977 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1977–78 domestic association football leagues to Category:1977–78 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1978 domestic association football leagues to Category:1978 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1978–79 domestic association football leagues to Category:1978–79 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1979 domestic association football leagues to Category:1979 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1979–80 domestic association football leagues to Category:1979–80 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1980 domestic association football leagues to Category:1980 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1980–81 domestic association football leagues to Category:1980–81 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1981 domestic association football leagues to Category:1981 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1981–82 domestic association football leagues to Category:1981–82 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1982 domestic association football leagues to Category:1982 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1982–83 domestic association football leagues to Category:1982–83 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1983 domestic association football leagues to Category:1983 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1983–84 domestic association football leagues to Category:1983–84 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1984 domestic association football leagues to Category:1984 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1984–85 domestic association football leagues to Category:1984–85 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1985 domestic association football leagues to Category:1985 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1985–86 domestic association football leagues to Category:1985–86 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1986 domestic association football leagues to Category:1986 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1986–87 domestic association football leagues to Category:1986–87 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1987 domestic association football leagues to Category:1987 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1987–88 domestic association football leagues to Category:1987–88 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1988 domestic association football leagues to Category:1988 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1988–89 domestic association football leagues to Category:1988–89 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1989 domestic association football leagues to Category:1989 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1989–90 domestic association football leagues to Category:1989–90 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1990 domestic association football leagues to Category:1990 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1990–91 domestic association football leagues to Category:1990–91 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1991 domestic association football leagues to Category:1991 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1991–92 domestic association football leagues to Category:1991–92 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1992 domestic association football leagues to Category:1992 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1992–93 domestic association football leagues to Category:1992–93 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1993 domestic association football leagues to Category:1993 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1993–94 domestic association football leagues to Category:1993–94 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1994 domestic association football leagues to Category:1994 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1994–95 domestic association football leagues to Category:1994–95 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1995 domestic association football leagues to Category:1995 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1995–96 domestic association football leagues to Category:1995–96 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1996 domestic association football leagues to Category:1996 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1996–97 domestic association football leagues to Category:1996–97 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1997 domestic association football leagues to Category:1997 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1997–98 domestic association football leagues to Category:1997–98 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1998 domestic association football leagues to Category:1998 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1998–99 domestic association football leagues to Category:1998–99 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1999 domestic association football leagues to Category:1999 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:1999–2000 domestic association football leagues to Category:1999–2000 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2000 domestic association football leagues to Category:2000 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2000–01 domestic association football leagues to Category:2000–01 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2001 domestic association football leagues to Category:2001 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2001–02 domestic association football leagues to Category:2001–02 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2002 domestic association football leagues to Category:2002 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2002–03 domestic association football leagues to Category:2002–03 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2003 domestic association football leagues to Category:2003 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2003–04 domestic association football leagues to Category:2003–04 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2004 domestic association football leagues to Category:2004 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2004–05 domestic association football leagues to Category:2004–05 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2005 domestic association football leagues to Category:2005 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2005–06 domestic association football leagues to Category:2005–06 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2006 domestic association football leagues to Category:2006 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2006–07 domestic association football leagues to Category:2006–07 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2007 domestic association football leagues to Category:2007 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2007–08 domestic association football leagues to Category:2007–08 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2008 domestic association football leagues to Category:2008 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2008–09 domestic association football leagues to Category:2008–09 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2009 domestic association football leagues to Category:2009 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2009–10 domestic association football leagues to Category:2009–10 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2010 domestic association football leagues to Category:2010 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2010–11 domestic association football leagues to Category:2010–11 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2011 domestic association football leagues to Category:2011 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2011–12 domestic association football leagues to Category:2011–12 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2012 domestic association football leagues to Category:2012 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2012–13 domestic association football leagues to Category:2012–13 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2013 domestic association football leagues to Category:2013 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2013–14 domestic association football leagues to Category:2013–14 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2014 domestic association football leagues to Category:2014 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2014–15 domestic association football leagues to Category:2014–15 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2015 domestic association football leagues to Category:2015 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2015–16 domestic association football leagues to Category:2015–16 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2016 domestic association football leagues to Category:2016 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2016–17 domestic association football leagues to Category:2016–17 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2017 domestic association football leagues to Category:2017 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2017–18 domestic association football leagues to Category:2017–18 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2018 domestic association football leagues to Category:2018 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2018–19 domestic association football leagues to Category:2018–19 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2019 domestic association football leagues to Category:2019 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2019–20 domestic association football leagues to Category:2019–20 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2020 domestic association football leagues to Category:2020 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2020–21 domestic association football leagues to Category:2020–21 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2021 domestic association football leagues to Category:2021 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2021–22 domestic association football leagues to Category:2021–22 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2022 domestic association football leagues to Category:2022 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2022–23 domestic association football leagues to Category:2022–23 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2023 domestic association football leagues to Category:2023 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2023–24 domestic association football leagues to Category:2023–24 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2024 domestic association football leagues to Category:2024 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2024–25 domestic association football leagues to Category:2024–25 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2025 domestic association football leagues to Category:2025 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2025–26 domestic association football leagues to Category:2025–26 in domestic association football leagues
Propose renaming Category:2026 domestic association football leagues to Category:2026 in domestic association football leagues

Nominator's rationale: Missing the word "in" after the stated season, it's proper naming convention. FastCube (talk) 16:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC).[reply]

Support speedy renaming :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』『articles I want to eat』 16:11, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Emirati films by year

Propose deleting Category:Emirati films by year (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Egyptian cinema by year (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Disestablishments in Bhutan by year (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Disestablishments in the Cook Islands by year (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Disestablishments in Curaçao by year (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Disestablishments in Djibouti by year (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Disestablishments in Eritrea by year (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Disestablishments in Eswatini by year (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Disestablishments in French Togoland by year (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Disestablishments in Palau by year (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Disestablishments in Saint Lucia by year (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Disestablishments in the Kingdom of Sardinia by year (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Disestablishments in Shanghai by year (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Crimes in Mauritius by year (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Crimes in Qatar by year (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Crimes in Senegal by year (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Crimes in Tonga by year (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Benin politics by year (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Elections in Benin by year (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Cricket in Belgium by year (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Cricket in Bermuda by year (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Cricket in Oman by year (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Cricket in Spain by year (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Motorsport in Poland by year (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose merging Category:2025 Emirati films (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:2020s Emirati films and Category:2025 in the United Arab Emirates
Propose merging Category:2006 in Egyptian cinema (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:2006 in film and Category:2006 in Egypt
Propose merging Category:2004 disestablishments in Bhutan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:2000s disestablishments in Bhutan, Category:2004 in Bhutan, and Category:2004 disestablishments in Asia
Propose merging Category:2007 disestablishments in the Cook Islands (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:2000s disestablishments in the Cook Islands, Category:2007 in the Cook Islands, and Category:2007 disestablishments in New Zealand
Propose merging Category:2019 disestablishments in Curaçao (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:2019 in Curaçao, Category:2010s disestablishments in Curaçao, Category:2019 disestablishments in North America, and Category:2019 disestablishments in the Netherlands
Propose merging Category:2009 disestablishments in Djibouti (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:2000s disestablishments in Djibouti, Category:2009 in Djibouti, and Category:2009 disestablishments in Africa
Propose merging Category:1921 disestablishments in Eritrea (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:1920s disestablishments in Eritrea, Category:1921 in Eritrea, Category:1921 disestablishments in Italy, and Category:1921 disestablishments in Africa
Propose merging Category:1973 disestablishments in Swaziland (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:1970s disestablishments in Swaziland, Category:1973 in Swaziland, and Category:1973 disestablishments in Africa
Propose merging Category:1959 disestablishments in French Togoland (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:1950s disestablishments in French Togoland, Category:1959 in French Togoland, Category:1959 disestablishments in Africa, and Category:1959 disestablishments in the French colonial empire
Propose merging Category:2018 disestablishments in Palau (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:2010s disestablishments in Palau and Category:2018 in Palau
Propose merging Category:2017 disestablishments in Saint Lucia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:2010s disestablishments in Saint Lucia and Category:2017 in Saint Lucia
Propose merging Category:1848 disestablishments in the Kingdom of Sardinia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:1840s disestablishments in the Kingdom of Sardinia, Category:1848 in the Kingdom of Sardinia, and Category:1848 disestablishments in Europe
Propose merging Category:2019 disestablishments in Shanghai (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:2010s disestablishments in Shanghai and Category:2019 in Shanghai
Propose merging Category:2011 crimes in Mauritius (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:2010s crimes in Mauritius, Category:2011 crimes by country, and Category:2011 crimes in Africa
Propose merging Category:2004 crimes in Qatar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:2000s crimes in Qatar, Category:2004 in Qatar, and Category:2004 crimes in Asia
Propose merging Category:1967 crimes in Senegal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:1960s crimes in Senegal, Category:1967 in Senegal, and Category:1967 crimes in Africa
Propose merging Category:1976 crimes in Tonga (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:1976 in Tonga, Category:1970s crimes in Tonga, and Category:1976 crimes in Oceania
Propose merging Category:2026 elections in Benin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:2020s elections in Benin, Category:2026 in Benin, and Category:2026 elections in Africa
Propose merging Category:2019 in Belgian cricket (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:2019 in cricket, Category:2019 in Belgian sport, and Category:2010s in Belgian cricket
Propose merging Category:2008 in Bermudian cricket (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:2008 in Bermudian sport and Category:2008 in cricket
Propose merging Category:2026 in Omani cricket (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:2026 in cricket, Category:2026 in Omani sport, and Category:2020s in Omani cricket
Propose merging Category:2020 in Spanish cricket (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:2020 in cricket, Category:2020 in Spanish sport, and Category:2020s in Spanish cricket
Propose merging Category:2025 in Polish motorsport (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:2025 in motorsport by country, Category:2025 in Polish sport, and Category:2020s in Polish motorsport

Nominator's rationale: Upmerge and delete certain categories, which only have one subcat and/or very few pages, as they make navigation rather tedious... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』『articles I want to eat』 15:37, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Not opposed to upmerging, but I did want to mention that the challenge with categories like this is that editors routinely think that this kind of thing is a scheme that automatically has to exist. The couple of film-related categories are where this intersects with my usual field of editing expertise, obviously — but people very routinely seem to think that if any country has a "YYYY country films" category, then that means every country automatically gets its own sibling as soon as there's even one film to file in it. That's not actually the case — a "YYYY country films" scheme is only supposed to exist if the country has a large number of films to warrant one (US, UK, France, Germany, Canada, India, etc.), and not if we only have a couple dozen or less articles about that country's films.
And obviously the same principle applies to sports, crime, politics and other areas where things get subbed by individual year: if any year-specific scheme exists for some countries, then people just assume that every country is automatically entitled to join it even if the amount of content available to categorize that way just doesn't warrant it at all. So this becomes an endless cycle of having categories like this spun off for just one or two things, and then reupmerged by CFD, and then spun back off again the next time somebody thinks they can create another similar category for just one or two things again.
So, again, not opposed to upmerging, but is there some other way that we can try to prevent this kind of thing from just becoming an endless create-delete-recreate loop in the future? Bearcat (talk) 15:54, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. This keeps happening: I create a decade category, fill it appropriately, then sooner or later another user comes along and assumes that I merely neglected diffuse it by year and does so themself.....despite every subcat containing 1, 2, maybe 3 articles. Or maybe one contains 6 articles and the rest 1-2. That in unhelpful for navigation. Though I predicted this would happen. Which is why I wondered if we should redirect these date categories to the categories they are being upmerged to. So when a user adds 2017 Venezuelan films (created yesterday), it automatically converts to 2020s Venezuelan films. But I felt CfD would never endorse this. The number of such redirects this would leave would be enormous. So I just moved on. Οἶδα (talk) 19:49, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, completely different categories should not be grouped together like this, the risk of keepable ones being deleted or umperged with the others because they don't get noticed is too big. The title is "Emirati films by year" but it contains things like "2019 in Belgian cricket" and "2009 disestablishmets in Djobouti". Close the nom and re-nominate in separate batches of closely related categories only. Fram (talk) 16:10, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

As an example, I just added a subcat with 4 extra articles to Category:2025 in Polish motorsport, and parallel categories can easily be made (we e.g. have 2024 Speedway Grand Prix of Poland, 2024 Rally Poland, 2024 Polish speedway season). So it seems likely that at least some of these can be populated and shouldn't be deleted or upmerged. Another one: Category:2006 in Egyptian cinema, could be expanded with e.g. The Yacoubian Building (film), A Difficult Mission and Halim (film).

So, once again, please close this trainwreck nomination, try to populate categories, and only then nominate smaller groups of clearly related categories which can't be expanded. Fram (talk) 16:25, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as nomonated. We really should create more standard minimums for category size and stop assuming we have to fill out sequences when it leads to too narrow categories.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:09, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Generally support, for now, this is mostly not helpful for navigation. Obviously that does not apply to categories that can easily be populated. I also agree with Fram that categories from completely different category trees should not be nominated together. Note that Category:2025 in motorsport by country is not a good merge target, that should become Category:2025 in motorsport. Year categories are not good merge targets for disestablishments categories. When there would be separate nominations per tree, I might spot more of these things. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:19, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Generally support per above. The lack of an all-inclusive nomination name or the fact that some cats can be populated more doesn't mean these categories are inappropriately grouped. Narrow categories are unhelpful for navigation. I get that it can be difficult to get explicit agreement on certain categories that have been populated post-nomination but the alternative is to needlessly clog up CfD. These narrow date categories all suffer the same problem, so there really isn't a reason against grouping them. And they are constantly being created, which is obviously due to the ease with which navigational template header templates enables users to do so. But that begs the question Bearcat posed above: can this actually be dealt with (read: discouraged) short of repeated CfDs such as this one? Οἶδα (talk) 20:13, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Red River Showdown

Propose deleting Category:Red River Showdown (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: A small category which does not aide navigation. This information and more is already categorized elsewhere. User:Namiba 13:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the stadium article should be purged and it is not helpful to keep the category for one article next to the eponymous article. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:31, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Smelters (occupation)

Rename Category:Smelters (occupation) to Category:Smelters (people)

Nominator's rationale In most cases where the term for people doing an occupation is in some way ambiguous we have (people) in parentheses after the name. Thus Category:Publishers (people) and Category:Mechanics (people). Smelter is both the facility where smelting is done and the person who does the smelting so we need some disambiguation. I almost created the target here because it is the expected form of the category name. I think we should Rename to the standard form. Especially since the current form makes one think this will contain articles about aspects or sub-groupins in the occupation of smelting, maybe articles that cover tin Smelters, lead Smelters, iron Smelters, copper Smelters, silver Smelters ect. Instead we have biographies of people who were Smelters so I think the target name would cause less surprise to users.John Pack Lambert (talk) 10:59, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Rename per nom. Mclay1 (talk) 15:06, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Rename, the category contains biographies. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:32, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Draft articles about the Americas

Propose merging Category:Draft articles about the Americas to Category:Draft articles about geography

Nominator's rationale: Upmerge unnecessary category layer. The two subcategories cover the entire topic. Mclay1 (talk) 08:16, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:34, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

15th century in Portugal

Propose merging Category:1411 in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1410s in Portugal and Category:1411 in Europe
Propose merging Category:1415 in Portugal (2 C, 2 P) to Category:1410s in Portugal and Category:1415 in Europe
Propose merging Category:1415 establishments in Portugal (1 C, 5 P) to Category:1410s establishments in Portugal and Category:1415 establishments in Europe
Propose merging Category:1415 in the Portuguese Empire (1 C, 1 P) to Category:1410s in the Portuguese Empire
Propose merging Category:1415 establishments in the Portuguese Empire (1 P) to Category:1410s establishments in the Portuguese Empire
Propose merging Category:1418 in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1410s in Portugal and Category:1418 in Europe
Propose merging Category:1419 in Portugal (2 P) to Category:1410s in Portugal and Category:1419 in Europe
Propose merging Category:1421 establishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1420s establishments in Portugal and Category:1421 establishments in Europe
Propose merging Category:1424 establishments in Portugal (2 P) to Category:1420s establishments in Portugal and Category:1421 establishments in Europe
Propose merging Category:1431 in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1430s in Portugal and Category:1431 in Europe
Propose merging Category:1433 disestablishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1430s disestablishments in Portugal and Category:1433 disestablishments in Europe
Propose merging Category:1434 establishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1430s establishments in Portugal and Category:1434 establishments in Europe
Propose merging Category:1437 in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1430s in Portugal and Category:1437 in Europe
Propose merging Category:1440 establishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1440s establishments in Portugal and Category:1440 establishments in Europe
Propose merging Category:1442 establishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1440s establishments in Portugal and Category:1442 establishments in Europe
Propose merging Category:1445 in the Portuguese Empire (1 P) to Category:1440s in the Portuguese Empire and Category:1445
Propose merging Category:1446 establishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1440s establishments in Portugal and Category:1446 establishments in Europe
Propose merging Category:1448 establishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1440s establishments in Portugal and Category:1448 establishments in Europe
Propose merging Category:1449 in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1440s in Portugal and Category:1449 in Europe
Propose merging Category:1452 in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1450s in Portugal and Category:1452 in Europe
Propose merging Category:1458 in the Portuguese Empire (1 P) to Category:1450s in the Portuguese Empire and Category:1458
Propose merging Category:1458 in the Portuguese Empire (2 P) to Category:1450s in the Portuguese Empire
Propose merging Category:1459 establishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1450s establishments in Portugal and Category:1459 establishments in Europe
Propose merging Category:1460 establishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1460s establishments in Portugal and Category:1460 establishments in Europe
Propose merging Category:1464 in Portugal (1 C, 1 P) to Category:1460s in Portugal and Category:1464 in Europe
Propose merging Category:1464 establishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1460s establishments in Portugal and Category:1464 establishments in Europe
Propose merging Category:1469 establishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1460s establishments in Portugal and Category:1469 establishments in Europe
Propose merging Category:1471 establishments in Portugal (1 C, 2 P) to Category:1470s establishments in Portugal and Category:1471 establishments in Europe
Propose merging Category:1471 establishments in the Portuguese Empire (2 P) to Category:1470s establishments in the Portuguese Empire
Propose merging Category:1471 in the Portuguese Empire (1 C, 2 P) to Category:1470s in the Portuguese Empire
Propose merging Category:1475 in Portugal (1 C, 1 P) to Category:1470s in Portugal and Category:1475 in Europe
Propose merging Category:1475 establishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1470s establishments in Portugal and Category:1475 establishments in Europe
Propose merging Category:1476 in Portugal (1 C, 1 P) to Category:1470s in Portugal and Category:1476 in Europe
Propose merging Category:1476 establishments in Portugal (2 P) to Category:1470s establishments in Portugal and Category:1476 establishments in Europe
Propose merging Category:1478 in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1470s in the Portuguese Empire
Propose merging Category:1479 in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1470s in Portugal and Category:1479 in Europe
Propose merging Category:1481 in Portugal (1 C, 2 P) to Category:1480s in Portugal and Category:1481 in Europe
Propose merging Category:1481 establishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1480s establishments in Portugal and Category:1481 establishments in Europe
Propose merging Category:1482 establishments in the Portuguese Empire (3 P) to Category:1480s establishments in the Portuguese Empire and Category:1482 establishments
Propose merging Category:1488 in the Portuguese Empire (1 P) to Category:1480s in the Portuguese Empire
Propose merging Category:1489 in Portugal (2 C, 1 P) to Category:1480s in Portugal and Category:1489 in Europe
Propose merging Category:1489 establishments in the Portuguese Empire (1 P) to Category:1480s establishments in the Portuguese Empire
Propose merging Category:1493 in Portugal (3 P) to Category:1490s in Portugal and Category:1493 in Europe
Propose merging Category:1494 in Portugal (1 C, 1 P) to Category:1490s in Portugal and Category:1494 in Europe
Propose merging Category:1494 in the Portuguese Empire (1 P) to Category:1490s in the Portuguese Empire
Propose merging Category:1496 in Portugal (1 C, 1 P) to Category:1490s in Portugal and Category:1496 in Europe
Propose merging Category:1496 establishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1490s establishments in Portugal and Category:1496 establishments in Europe
Propose merging Category:1498 establishments in Portugal (3 P) to Category:1490s establishments in Portugal and Category:1498 establishments in Europe

Nominator's rationale: merge, per WP:OCYEAR, mainly one- or two-articles categories, this is not helpful for navigation. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:46, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merge These are too narrow categories to aid navigation.John Pack Lambert (talk) 11:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Image Epoch games

Propose renaming Category:Image Epoch games to Category:Imageepoch games

Nominator's rationale: The company name is imageepoch, not Image Epoch _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:52, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:53, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The nomination is to rename not delete. Mclay1 (talk) 04:12, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
- It was meant to be in the section below. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:12, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Rename. This could have been speedied. Mclay1 (talk) 04:12, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Organised events in Transvaal

Propose deleting Category:Organised events in Transvaal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Redundant category layer with only one subcategory, which is already categorised elsewhere in Category:Transvaal. Mclay1 (talk) 03:49, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:13, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Organized events in the Philippines by region

Propose merging Category:Organized events in the Philippines by region (2) to Category:Organized events in the Philippines
Propose deleting Category:Organized events in the Philippines by province (1)
Propose deleting Category:Organized events in Cebu (1)

Nominator's rationale: Upmerge/delete unnecessary category layers. Category:Elections in the Philippines by region can purged because it's already in another subcategory of the target. Mclay1 (talk) 03:46, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Manually merge and delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:55, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Knight Commanders of the Exalted Order of Malacca

Propose merging Category:Knight Commanders of the Exalted Order of Malacca to Category:Recipients of the Order of the Exalted Order of Malacca

Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now, underpopulated category ^SMason_Garrison 01:32, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, this is not helpful for navigation. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:56, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both These are both cases of categorizing by awards that are not such that they will almost always be mentioned when speaking of the person so they do not fit our guidelines by categorizing by award.John Pack Lambert (talk) 11:02, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Agree on that, but then the sibling category should be nominated too. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:18, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Recipients of the Order of Manas, 3rd class

Propose merging Category:Recipients of the Order of Manas, 3rd class to Category:Recipients of the Order of Manas

Nominator's rationale: Underpopulated category, upmerge for now ^SMason_Garrison 01:29, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

~~Merge~~, this is not helpful for navigation. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:57, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both These do not meet our limited circumstances under which we categorize by award.John Pack Lambert (talk) 11:02, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both per Johnpacklambert (or else merge per nom). I will tag the target. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:20, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Non-renewable resource companies established in 1750

Propose merging Category:Non-renewable resource companies established in 1750 to Category:Companies established in 1750

Nominator's rationale: upmerge for now. underpopulated and isolated category. There is only one page in the entire Non-renewable resource companies established in the 18th century tree ^SMason_Garrison 00:34, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Just delete, the article is about (the exploitation of) certain coal mines, but nothing is said about the establishment of a company. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the article is about coal mines in an area but does not mention a company.John Pack Lambert (talk) 11:04, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

Cheetah Woods

Cheetah Woods → Tiger Woods (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Unmentioned redirect at the target and anywhere on wikipedia. Does not seem to help the reader. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 16:33, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. मल्ल (talk) 19:05, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. This is almost certainly a bad joke in the wrong place, given that it's creation was contemporary with Tiger Woods#Infidelity scandal and fallout. Thryduulf (talk) 20:10, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Barney Bunch

The Barney Bunch → Anti-Barney humor (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

No coverage of the redirect's topic in the target article, and similarly-titled article "Barney Bunch" is currently salted. ZeroJaguar (talk) 16:32, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. There have been multiple attempts to create an article at this title, the only one of which that hasn't been revision deleted would be speediable under A7 if restored so we don't need to worry about that. There was a section at the target, but that was removed by Inhighspeed in 2021 with the summary "Vulgar, homophobic, lacking in notoriety, and probably self-promoting.") and that seems to have stuck. The last disruption related to this redirect was in 2012 so salting seems unnecessary. Thryduulf (talk) 20:21, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Jaimee Grubbs

Jaimee Grubbs → Tiger Woods#TWInfidelity (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mention at the current target and unlikely to be mentioned there again, reasonably. Mentioned in passing at Tool Academy season 1, but I am unsure if redirection there or deletion is better. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 16:30, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note the page is currently untagged due to being fully protected, but I did leave an edit request on the talk page. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 16:31, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I requested unprotection at WP:RFPP...either way. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 19:50, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note I've tagged the redirect, but I've not looked whether the protection should remain. Thryduulf (talk) 20:23, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Kamisato (Genshin Impact)

Kamisato (Genshin Impact) → List of Genshin Impact characters#Inazuma (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Tagging per WP:RFD#DELETE criterion 2 -- there are multiple characters in Genshin Impact named Kamisato (Ayaka and Ayato; brother and sister), and in nearly all sources they are either referred to by their given names. This redirect could cause confusion as to which Kamisato sibling it refers to. Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 16:18, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Noting here that the creator of the redirect has been blocked from project namespace for disruptive redirects, so I doubt we will get a response from them. (thread) Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 16:57, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Reylo

Reylo → Star Wars sequel trilogy (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

No mention at target page. Where should it point instead? Rose Abrams (T C L) 12:27, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

For your information, from judging the face value of one quick search, there might be enough RS for someone to write a standalone article. Rose Abrams (T C L) 12:30, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this was originally created as a redirect to Kylo Ren, but the term is not mentioned there beyond being in the title of a reference (ping user:(Oinkers42) who retargetted). The name is mentioned at The Love Hypothesis but that wouldn't make a good target as it links to this redirect clearly expecting it to lead to detailed information elsewhere. The last paragraph at Shipping (fandom)#Shipping debates is relevant, but I'm weakly against that as a target as it requires knowledge from earlier in that article to make sense if you aren't familiar with the concept of shipping in the fandom context (and I don't think we can assume everyone using this search term is). The "Naming conventions" section of the same article also mentions this name, but it's just a passing mention as an example and also requires contextual knowledge so is definitely not a good target. Thryduulf (talk) 12:59, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Shipping (fandom), which covers this topic better than any other current article. No need to target a specific section, since it's mentioned in three sections. I'd be curious to see an attempt at a standalone article, but that's outside the purview of this discussion. - Eureka Lott 19:32, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Alert of death

Alert of death → Fork bomb#Alert of death (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned at target and I couldn't find it mentioned in another article. Suonii180 (talk) 10:09, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Content was added to the article by the redirect's creator at about the time the redirect was created and removed without summary by an IP editor a week later. As this was in 2011 and (afaict) it hasn't been re-added it's safe to say the removal stuck. It doesn't seem to be an established term for that either, "alert of death" -Wikipedia gets fewer than 20 hits on google, only 2 of which are in a computing context and neither have this meaning. Thryduulf (talk) 11:37, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The content is also wrong. Since JavaScript code is synchronous unless it uses async features the removed code isn't a fork bomb. * Pppery * _{in solidarity} 16:44, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Partido Democrat

Partido Democrat → Democratic Party (Curaçao) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

article says Partido Democraat, which is not this title. ambiguous with Democrat (Brazil) and even Democrat (U.S.), since this title is meant to be words of mixed languages. Dudzcar (talk) 05:38, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep This is a fairly plausible misspelling of the Papiamento name for the target article and it does get uses [19], [20] (although most commonly in Dutch, which obviously has affinity to Curacao). Most google results though are actually for various parties called Partido Democrático (rendered with or without the diacritic). Thryduulf (talk) 10:09, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget. There are no parties known by this exact mixed-language title. In addition to Papiamento creole, Partido means party in at least two other languages (Spanish and Portuguese) and there are numerous options on the Democratic Party dab page that could correspond to either Partido Demócrata or Partido Democrático (both of which are equally plausible typos compared to Partido Democraat). That dab would be my preferred target as it favours the English "Democrat" part of the redirect (this is enwiki after all) rather than the Partido Democrático dab which would favour Portuguese over Spanish, and would make it harder to reach the existing Papiamento target. Rosbif73 (talk) 11:50, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:07, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hexamastix

Hexamastix → Hexamastix coercens (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

I'm not entirely sure why this name was redirected to Hexamastix coercens - Hexamastix is a genus with 18 accepted species according to AlgaeBase, so H. coercens is neither the sole or even the type species (which is H. batrachorum). This redirect should either be expanded into an article on the genus or deleted to allow for an article to be created at a later date. Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 08:26, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I created the redirect because Hexamastix had over 40 incoming article links and Hexamastix coercens had been tagged as an orphan article for over 10 years. It seemed like a way to point readers at least to a related article rather than nothing, and possibly help everybody out. To me, a redirect is even easier to turn into an article than a redlink, it definitely wasn't my intention to slow the creation of an article at Hexamastix. I didn't realize this wasn't a good practice so I won't do it anymore. --Here2rewrite (talk) 12:34, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Athletics at the 2026 Asian Games

Athletics at the 2026 Asian Games → 2026 Asian Games (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
3x3 basketball at the 2026 Asian Games → 2026 Asian Games (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Kabaddi at the 2026 Asian Games – Women's tournament → Kabaddi at the 2026 Asian Games (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Kabaddi at the 2026 Asian Games – Men's tournament → Kabaddi at the 2026 Asian Games (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Too early for this, can be created closer to the games when more information is available. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:01, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Bundled four identical nominations made by the same editor. CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:33, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 08:01, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the Kabbadi redirects as they point to an existing article about the sport at the upcoming games. Delete the other two as the current target contains little information on specific sports. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 14:23, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Solidarity

Wikipedia:Solidarity → Wikipedia:WikiProject Anarchism/Participate (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This currently redirects to WikiProject Anarchism; should the target be changed to the petition where WP:SOLIDARITY links, at least temporarily? BlaqWiedow (talk) 04:39, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I should note that I added a hatnote to the top of the petition page, feel free to revert if that is not necessary. BlaqWiedow (talk) 04:43, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to suggested. No need to have inconsistency in capitalization. --ABx11 (she/they | formerly TheAuroraBorealis | In solidarity) 05:04, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Gosh. This redirect is ancient. It originally must have pointed at a WikiProject Anarchism essay (it was titled something like "solidarity among rogues", if I recall correctly) that's long since gone. Retarget, and no need for the hatnote. In solidarity, asilvering (talk) 05:45, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, that mini-essay is a hell of a time-capsule of 2000s Wikipedia. --Grnrchst (talk) 14:59, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget per above. No need for a hat note. This redirect is obviously way outdated. --Grnrchst (talk) 15:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

CNN Underscored

CNN Underscored → CNN (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 26 § CNN Underscored – delete

Unmentioned and potentially misleading redirect. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 01:45, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and previous discussion to delete, which had the same target. When this redirect was created, no mention was added, so I believe this redirect meets WP:G4. Mathguy2718 (talk) 02:08, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as creator – This redirect is for the |publisher= field in citations that cite CNN Underscored. CNN Underscored is the review division of CNN, analogous to The Athletic vis-à-vis The New York Times, io9 vis-à-vis Gizmodo, or Vulture vis-à-vis New York magazine. Redirects are WP:CHEAP, so there is no benefit to having to pipe the link in every citation template as |publisher=[[CNN|CNN Underscored]]. Of course, I am not opposed to adding some information about CNN Underscored to our main article for CNN, but the lack thereof alone should not be grounds for deletion. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:07, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is a prominently featured category of (rather spammy appearing) content on CNN, which is a major source of information for millions of people (or more than millions). I don't see a good reason to delete it. I also see nothing misleading about it. Are these supposed to be objective reviews or are they just ads? Either way, it's a well-established category of something published by CNN. (By the way, I think that should be used in the |work= parameter, not the |publisher= parameter.) Probably the CNN article should mention it explicitly, because their website promotes a lot of things in that category. They seem to say they use their own judgment about which products they choose to promote, but provide links to where the recommended products can be purchased, and they collect revenue from the sellers when people use those links. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 01:27, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I just added a couple of sentences about it into the CNN article. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 01:51, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for doing that. And yeah, technically, the citation syntax should be |website=[[CNN Underscored]] |publisher=[[CNN]]. InfiniteNexus (talk) 21:59, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the added mention?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Fossil giant salamanders (Cryptobranchidae)

AviturusAviturus → Giant salamander (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
UlanurusUlanurus → Giant salamander (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
ZaissanurusZaissanurus → Giant salamander (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Delete per reason 10 (...could plausibly be expanded into an article...). The target page does not discuss the redirects beyond simple mentions. Per WP:NSPECIES, all species (and the genera containing them) are considered notable. It is certainly not common practice to redirect genus/species to their parent taxa, as this discourages their creation and/or elaboration (WP:RED; there is currently no indication that the page in question needs to be created). -SlvrHwk (talk) 03:54, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Plantdrew (talk) 04:19, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'm not against deletion, @SlvrHwk, but I have to point out that WP:NSPECIES doesn't cover fossil taxa. Chess enjoyer (talk) 07:06, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

1-12cav

1-12cav → 12th Cavalry Regiment (United States) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
2-12cav → 12th Cavalry Regiment (United States) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
1/12cav → 12th Cavalry Regiment (United States) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
2/12cav → 12th Cavalry Regiment (United States) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
1-12 cav → 12th Cavalry Regiment (United States) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
2-12 cav → 12th Cavalry Regiment (United States) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
2/12 cav → 12th Cavalry Regiment (United States) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
1/12 cav → 12th Cavalry Regiment (United States) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Apparent shorthand for the battalions that comprise the regiment, but this does not appear to be in common use (at least not on Wikipedia), and as redirects these are vague and potentially confusing and ambiguous. No incoming links. Mdewman6 (talk) 03:32, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Republic Italy

Republic Italy → Italy (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Italy Republic → Italy (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Odd ungrammatical redirects that aren't helping anyone find our article on Italy. Potentially harmful getting in the way of search results for keywords. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 02:53, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep for "Republic Italy" as a quite plausible redirect.

Keep for "Italy Republic" as a slightly less but still plausible redirect. Maxeto0910 (talk) 03:29, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Live on Air

Live on Air → Red Hot Chili Peppers (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Live On Air → Red Hot Chili Peppers (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned in target article, not mentioned anywhere on the English Wikipedia. The phrasing of these redirects make them rather ambiguous; not sure (and I weak oppose, but mentioning for WP:BEFORE completeness) if retargeting these to Live broadcast makes sense here since apparently these redirects represent multiple topics, such as apparently a subject related to Bon Jovi. Steel1943 (talk) 07:26, 12 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This is evidently the title of multiple unofficial releases (1994 CD, 2007 DVD) compiling material by the band. The same is true for Bon Jovi (2010 CD), among many other artists. I doubt any of these is notable.

@Steel1943: Why do you oppose retargeting to live broadcast? (And would you object to creating live on air as a redirect to live broadcast? I was surprised to see it didn't already exist.) – Scyrme (talk) 18:08, 12 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Scyrme: I guess my best way of explaining my stance on this is ... I just changed my stance on that option to "weak oppose" since I really don't have a strong opinion about it, but it definitely seems like this title is ambiguous for a lot of unnotable topics, plus there's the off chance that someone might literally think the phrase "live on air" is about something that literally lives (is alive) on air [particles] or something like that. Steel1943 (talk) 18:41, 12 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt someone would search "live on air" in search of living organisms that inhabit the air, but if it's plausible then a hatnote could deal with that: I suppose "aeroplankton" isn't a widely known word, so maybe someone might search "live on air" for them, but that's really more of a description than a title. Regardless, the overwhelmingly most common use of the expression "live on air" (both on and off Wikipedia) is in reference to live broadcasts, and these various unofficial releases are in-fact all using it in that way too (they're unofficial compilations of live performances). – Scyrme (talk) 20:01, 12 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Aeroplankton seems like a stretch. And are these the only organisms that fit the, rather vague, description of "lives on air"? Inedia ("breatharianism") seems more likely. But I don't suggest that is a good target for these. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 15:55, 16 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Breatharianism had also occurred to me, but that's more "people" that "live on air" than "organisms" that "live on air", and the latter better fits the description Steel1943 gave. Regardless, I agree with you that both are a stretch. If others disagree though, and think it's better to be thorough and cover all possible interpretations, I'd prefer a hatnote to a disambiguation page because "live on air" where "live" is the verb, not the adjective, isn't a topic title but is rather a description. Neither Aeroplankton nor Inedia could actually be titled "live on air", even if their topics could be described as "living on air". Regardless, the primary topic for "live on air" is certainly live broadcasting based on overwhelming use. – Scyrme (talk) 18:04, 16 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Lean retarget to live broadcast to match live on air which I've decided to create, as the basic phrase has a very clear primary topic regardless of whether "live" can plausibly be interpreted as a verb or not. I'm not convinced the phrase is especially ambiguous beyond its use in the titles of unofficial compilations of media that was previously only available "live on air". While the capitalisation of these redirects suggests a search for a title, there are no articles or mentions for any of them that I could find. If others think it's plausible at least one of them is notable, Live on Air can be tagged as {{r with possibilities}} and revisited if substantial content is contributed either as a new article or coverage within another article. Only lean towards retargeting as a case could be made for WP:RETURNTORED if one of these titles is notable, but that seems unlikely as the only external search results I saw in relation to these titles were things like Discogs pages and people selling copies on eBay.. – Scyrme (talk) 18:30, 16 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further thoughts on retargeting?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:17, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

DABify the few articles that may be relevant, including potential misspellings / erroneous titles as deemed relevant by editors such as (possibly) On Air – Live at the BBC Volume 2, On Air (John Fahey album) (a live recording), Live on the Air, etc. My only concern is that this could become an excessive listing, in particular if editors link to records that don't have their own article and just link to the band's page (as is currently the case with this redirect). Shazback (talk) 07:59, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947 ‡ ^edits 01:56, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Templates and Modules

Template:Tennis tournament seeded players legend final

Template:Tennis tournament seeded players legend final (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused legend template. Gonnym (talk) 12:54, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Remove - I created it because we had no template the covered the things it did and it was vitally needed. However recently our older template was upgraded to include those same vital needs. This template can now be deleted. Fyunck(click) (talk) 17:24, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and not a subst template. Seems Template:Mbabel1c is the one used. Gonnym (talk) 12:36, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Drainage basin succession templates

Category:Drainage basin succession templates and subpages

I am nominating all of the templates in Category:Drainage basin succession templates (and its subcats) for replacement with {{drainage}}, which I created to centralise all of the 2k templates into one easy-to-update template. This means that if a new drainage basin is needed, a single template can just be edited rather than having to create yet another template. There will be no visible change to any article; code-wise it will simply be changing (for example) {{PAchelous}} to {{Drainage|Achelous}}. Primefac (talk) 00:32, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I've listed them all at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2026 June 4/Drainage basin succession templates. Gonnym (talk) 06:02, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There are two functionalities that will be lost by replacing the R- and P-templates with this new template. First, the R-templates categorize the articles that use them into a tributaries category, for instance {{RMeurthe}} into Category:Tributaries of the Moselle. Second, the system of interlinked P-templates implies that only one P-template ({{PWeser}}) has to be modified if the Weser article is moved to for instance Weser (river). In the {{Drainage}} template it would have to be changed in 55 places. Markussep ^Talk 07:46, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I'm still working on a recursive version to deal with that; will likely be a module, but if not, the new syntax editor allows for really quick find/replace for something like Weser → Weser (river). As far as the Rs go, we have moved away from templates adding content categories to articles, so the R-names should be deprecated anyway. Primefac (talk) 09:26, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Why? --Joy (talk) 12:12, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

About moving away from templates adding content categories to articles, could you point me to that guideline? Markussep ^Talk 12:50, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
WP:TEMPLATECAT. Gonnym (talk) 14:18, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
That guideline recommendation lists many reasons, but it's not clear which of them apply here. --Joy (talk) 17:20, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you create an implementation that confirms this is useful first, and then transclude it from those templates, make sure there's no regressions, and only then start a TfD to replace the call sites in the articles?

I never liked the P* and R* names myself, they seem too obfuscated, but that doesn't mean the functionality is bad. --Joy (talk) 12:15, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellany

Template:User support Ansar Allah

Ansar Allah is considered a designated terrorist group by Yemen (Presidential Leadership Council), Costa Rica, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, the United States, Malaysia, Australia, New Zealand and Canada. This userbox is a really bad idea because of this. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 18:43, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review

Pet Storey (closed)

Pet Storey – I reverted the close, reopened and relisted the AfD per WP:REOPEN. Owen× ☎ 12:26, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.

Not the most controversial page around, but a problematic WP:NAC nonetheless. There were three extant opinions voiced in the AFD; the delete of the nominator, a keep and a merge. The discussion was then closed as merge by User:VerdictByLogic, which is problematic for three reasons: (a) the user is inexperienced and currently has slightly more than 2,000 edits (b) the consensus does not appear clear at all (c) the choice to merge looks like a blatant WP:SUPERVOTE since VerdictByLogic argues for this choice, with it being VerdictByLogic's own opinion that the subject "does not require" a standalone article. The user also did so when I first asked about this on the talk page. I suggest that the closure be overturned to relist. Geschichte (talk) 11:48, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.

[1] "Instagram". www.instagram.com. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

[1]

v t e Wikipedia community
For a listing of current collaborations, tasks, and news, see the Community portal. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the Dashboard.
General community topics	Administration News The Signpost Goings-on In the media Meetups Mailing lists Wikipedians Statistics The Wikipedia Library Centralized discussion Village pump Idea lab Policy Proposals Technical Miscellaneous WMF Holidays Bots
Contents and grading	Requested articles Most-wanted articles Images needing articles Articles needing images Articles for creation WP:AFC/R WP:AFC/C Creating articles Help Vital articles Articles for improvement Peer review Good article nominations Featured article candidates Lists Pictures Topics Article translation Pages Main Page Errors
WikiProjects and collaborations	Directory Culture and the arts Geographical History and society Science, technology and engineering Wikipedia assistance and tasks Patrols Recent changes Counter-Vandalism Unit Accessibility Organizations category
Awards and feedback	Reward board Contests A nice cup of tea and a sit down Charitableness WikiLove Compliment before criticism Kindness Campaign Thanks!
Maintenance tasks	Task Center Open tasks Backlog Category Admin category Edit requests Category Database reports Category tracker Dusty articles Special pages New pages Recent changes Controversial issues
Administrators and noticeboards	Administrators' noticeboard Incidents Edit warring Vandalism Admin dashboard Admin requests Closure Page protection User permissions Sockpuppets Open proxies Revision deletion Oversight Request Usernames Changing Title blacklist OTRS Bureaucrats' Requests for adminship and bureaucratship Arbitration Committee Requests Enforcement
Content dispute resolution	Requests for comment Third opinion Dispute resolution noticeboard Biographies of living persons Conflict of interest External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view No original research Reliable sources
Other noticeboards and assistance	Regional notice boards Requests for help Category Asking questions Teahouse Help desk Reference desk Adopt-a-user Copyright assistance Copyright investigations Text problems Media questions Resource requests Mergers History mergers Moves Page importation Spam Blacklist Whitelist Bots Education General sanctions Editor sanctions Long-term abuse
Deletion discussions	Guide Admin Today Articles Templates Files Categories Redirects Miscellany Speedy Proposed BLP LLM Review Undeletion Arguments to avoid Arguments to make Article Rescue
Elections and voting	Requests for comment (meta) Wikimedia Foundation elections WP Democracy Milestones
Directories, indexes, and summaries	Departments Edit summary legend Editor's index Essays FAQs Glossary Abbreviations Help Manual of Style Simplified Rules Five pillars Policies Guidelines Shortcuts Templates Citation templates Tips Today Tools Wiki markup
Media Category Templates

Wikipedia:XfD today

Speedy deletion candidates

Articles

Files

MeTV Virginia logos

Bounce logos

Categories

NEW NOMINATIONS

Category:SpektreWorks aircraft

Category:Nigerian anti-apartheid activists

Category:Liechtenstein human rights activists

Category:Horses in film and television

Category:Green Bay Packers Hall of Fame

Category:German anti-apartheid activists

Category:Hasidic feminists

Category:Pornographic actresses who died by suicide

Category:Academics who died by suicide

Domestic association football leagues by season

Emirati films by year

Category:Red River Showdown

Category:Smelters (occupation)

Category:Draft articles about the Americas

15th century in Portugal

Category:Image Epoch games

Category:Organised events in Transvaal

Category:Organized events in the Philippines by region

Category:Knight Commanders of the Exalted Order of Malacca

Category:Recipients of the Order of Manas, 3rd class

Category:Non-renewable resource companies established in 1750

Redirects

Cheetah Woods

The Barney Bunch

Jaimee Grubbs

Kamisato (Genshin Impact)

Reylo

Alert of death

Partido Democrat

Hexamastix

Athletics at the 2026 Asian Games

Wikipedia:Solidarity

CNN Underscored

Fossil giant salamanders (Cryptobranchidae)

1-12cav

Republic Italy

Live on Air

Templates and Modules

Drainage basin succession templates

Miscellany

Deletion review

Pet Storey (closed)

Content Disclaimer