DOKUMEN123.COM

of other languages, or vice versa. Shortcuts WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTSWP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS WP:OTHERSTUFFWP:OTHERSTUFF WP:OTHERWP:OTHER WP:OSEWP:OSE WP:WAXWP:WAX...

BLP1E? Consider the oft-namedropped WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, a common argument in deletion discussions. OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is frequently used as a rejoinder to...

requirements are lower than in others. This is related to the argument WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS - to the extent that an article within field (a) is included while...

hands and violate the guidelines. Nor is this in conflict with WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. That essentially states that article X having passed some sort of...

It doesn't matter that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS - my point is that it meets WP:GNG. It's not surprising that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS given that the teams are in...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Disregarding WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS arguments, there is a (weak) consensus to delete below. Daniel (talk)...

article should remain. Wayne Jayes (talk) 14:11, 2 June 2016 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. If the other deans have similar notability, perhaps their articles...

List of Jericho episodes, let someone do the merge from there, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't a valid agruement. Secret account 22:59, 8 December 2007 (UTC)...

29 January 2008 (UTC) Again, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS--Hu12 (talk) 02:32, 29 January 2008 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS -- please link to where another list...

comment added by Migrant (talk • contribs) @Migrant: what about WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS then? GiantSnowman 09:16, 10 April 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

problems, but I don't believe that any of them are worthy of deletion. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid reason for deletion. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 01:37...

stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] Wikipedia:OtherstuffexistsWikipedia:Otherstuffexists → Wikipedia:When to use or avoid "other stuff exists"...

Miami33139 (talk) 21:22, 20 February 2009 (UTC) Don't wanna get into WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS but realistically, every GNOME and KDE and XFCE component has its own...

consensus, 2010 discussion was filled with WP:ILIKEIT, WP:ITSNOTABLE, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, and other invalid rationales. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw...

8 October 2016 (UTC) See my comments at the Teahouse. See also WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. I wouldn't have accepted the other article. As another editor indicated...

criteria has an article, than there's nothing wrong with WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS because teams in this league get significant media coverage...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep per WP:BIO and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:37, 15 May 2008 (UTC) Porn starNude model (correction)...

far more detailed. --JDC808 ♫ 06:06, 8 July 2013 (UTC) For one WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is an improper argument, though I'm not saying that the LBP DLC lists...

5 minutes. Rexplosion (talk) 01:52, 1 July 2009 (UTC) Comment - WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid reason. -WarthogDemon 01:53, 1 July 2009 (UTC) Delete...

Ultimen? == Chad78 (talk) 17:17 5 December 2008 (CST) Please read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:50, 6 December 2008 (UTC) The argument for...

note any of those colleges gets far more coverage. you're using WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LibStar (talk • contribs)...

notable mayor of a small town. Cambrassa's argument is refuted by WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, and Dendodge's by the lack of any sources showing notability. It could...

9 May 2009 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS does not count as a valid reason. LibStar (talk) 13:58, 10 May 2009 (UTC) OTHERSTUFFEXIST indeed counts as a reason...

of notability provided. Other keep reasons centred mainly around WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, which is not a valid argument at WP:AFD. PeterSymonds (talk) 14:54...

for every NBA team seasons. As for the WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument, there is not just WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, but numerous similar articles across multiple...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Disregarding WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS arguments, there is a (weak) consensus to delete below. Daniel (talk)...

premature, at best. --Schcamboaon scéal? 11:32, 7 June 2008 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, we're not talking about Springfield. I may change my vote if references...

December 2012 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Till 22:08, 17 December 2012 (UTC) Consistency with similar AfDs is not an OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument. - The Bushranger...

delete. Many of the keep arguments were based on WP:CRYSTAL or WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:16, 7 May 2009 (UTC) Math is Cool Championships...

result was delete. Arguments to keep are based on WP:USEFUL and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, neither of which are convincing. Also a lack of any secondary sources...

automatically, and this particular example fails WP:GNG. Also bear in mind WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. GiantSnowman 07:33, 19 April 2015 (UTC) Take a look at WP:SAL and...

result was delete. The "keep" !votes boil down to WP:ILIKEIT and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, whereas the delete !votes are solidly based in policy. Randykitty...

passing mentions and not indepth coverage, Also as noted by Charles OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't a valid argument to make either, Anyway as I said judging from...

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a reason for keeping this article. LibStar (talk) 03:52, 20 November 2009 (UTC) I never noted that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS was...

Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, particularly WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS This number has been chosen as an arbitrary convenient round number...

(including this one). This is an example of keep stuff because WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Ajf773 (talk) 17:31, 25 March 2018 (UTC) Zanhe - No reason to delete...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Disregarding WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS arguments, there is a (weak) consensus to delete below. Daniel (talk)...

happen, and so is not notable. Twice created from redirect using WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, which isn't a good reason. If you look at Category:Sports events cancelled...

by me.--Milowent • hasspoken 21:43, 26 January 2012 (UTC) Using WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS as to whether an article should be kept or deleted is not a valid argument...

WP:TOOSOON. I ignored the !vote by J McCal, which boiled down to WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and WP:ILIKEIT. Randykitty (talk) 10:41, 29 September 2015 (UTC) David...

Unfortunately for the one keep voter, their argument is a variation on OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Drmies (talk) 04:24, 17 October 2015 (UTC) Ole Miss–Tennessee football...

was delete. Clearly not meeting WP:WEB, even taking into account WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 22:42, 21 June 2010 (UTC) Topbargains.com.au...

European Cup and UEFA Champions League records and statistics but WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS as that is the top-level club tournament in Europe and one of the biggest...

to this page.‎ The result was delete. Lack of sources outweighs WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and WP:BIG arguments. Mr.Z-man 23:42, 11 October 2008 (UTC) Church...

parent company articles. Vegaswikian 18:01, 22 June 2007 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a good argument here. Let's discuss this particular case. What...

relies on precedent, which is itself a form of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. So I think that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, while not a strong argument on its own, can make...

convincing. Awards aren't major enough to confer notability, and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a strong argument. Ultimately, it fails WP:GNG. ‑Scottywong| gab _...

encyclopedia topic. Dew Kane (talk) 23:21, 12 September 2010 (UTC) Comment WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument in a deletion debate. noq (talk) 23:35, 12...

won't be an ideal precedent because it would still be an example of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Moreover, this is the first time you cited guidelines, in the previous...

automatically mean that we should have articles on every album; see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. However, I disagree with the reviewer's rationale because this album...

that novel be deleted. Kurt (talk) 05:06, 17 July 2010 (UTC) Read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Claritas § 10:12, 17 July 2010 (UTC) Read it many times. I guess I...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid counter-argument to a lack of notability. ♠PMC♠ (talk)...

section. Thanks. JabberJawJAPAN talk 23:31, 27 September 2017 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a reason for keeping. please demonstrate how it actually meets...

is notability. 🍺 Antiqueight chat 02:28, 24 January 2016 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a reason for keeping. LibStar (talk) 05:40, 24 January 2016...

page.‎ The result was delete. The keep arguments mostly some form of OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. While delete arguments make the case that NLIST has not been met....

the significant third party coverage to meet WP:SPORTSEVENT? Also WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a reason for keeping. LibStar (talk) 22:17, 1 November 2022...

The entirety of it boils down to, as we would say on Wikipedia, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. The author just complains about events in other countries and in the...

was delete. The only keep arguments are based on WP:TOOSOON and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Randykitty (talk) 09:17, 15 August 2015 (UTC) Mahnama Sultan ul Faqr...

2017 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a reason to keep. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:15, 15 January 2017 (UTC) It is not WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. It is that sources...

to the nomination statement was shown; the only Keep !vote was WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS Black Kite (talk) 12:07, 14 June 2012 (UTC) AfDs for this article:...

Special:PrefixIndex/Living Prime. Cabayi (talk) 10:19, 26 November 2018 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid reason for keeping. In my opinion, all of those articles...

2012 (UTC) Category:Lists of songs by authors or performers and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS are not policies or guidelines and thus not valid reasons for keeping...

fact that there are other "Beast of..." articles in immaterial per WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. As I said before, this article lacks significant coverage and notability...

GS. Fenix down (talk) 10:09, 30 January 2014 (UTC) Comment wait WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS means that precedent is out the window. But WP:OTHERSTUFFDELETED is...

only on the basis of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Obuibo Mbstpo (talk) 20:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC) Comment If you look at WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, you'll see that this...

a Wikipedia article for every episode of the series" fall into WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, which is a not a valid argument at AFD. (non-admin closure) Natg 19...

read WP:NOCRUFT. ANDROS1337TALK 23:33, 18 January 2018 (UTC) First WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Bus fleet articles are generally rare, a search shows less than 10...

Cassandra Whitehead was notable either and the comparison is simply WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Nevertheless, if you can find sources that do more than mention her...

of deletion. --Wizard IT (talk) 00:55, 20 March 2010 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Each article must be examined on its own merit, or in this case lack...

redirect to Yes Network. Notability not established, despite ILIKEIT and OTHERSTUFFEXISTS arguments. Article history still available if there is any sourced...

unfortunately, flawed. -- VegitaU (talk) 03:12, 10 March 2008 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument. нмŵוτнτ 02:34, 12 March 2008 (UTC) The above...

years. Also, please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Fenix down (talk) 13:15, 23 February 2015 (UTC) @Fenix down: but WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not means alone for deletion...

Walrus Ji (talk) 05:28, 29 January 2021 (UTC) Delete Not buying the WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. This list is just a replication of the kind of poster displayed at...

!vote recognized the possibility for a redirect, the other was WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Redirected to publisher.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:22, 30 March 2014...

(UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. --GreenJoe 16:42, 16 May 2007 (UTC) Are you bringing a straw man into this? I don't see the WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS or WP:Pokémon...

it. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:38, 4 October 2020 (UTC) This is a WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument which is generally not considered to be a great reason for...

Secondly, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Thirdly, it fails not just the GNG but also WP:V. Huon (talk) 01:12, 3 June 2012 (UTC) Comment  WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS also indicates...

The result was delete. Only argument to keep has been a bizarre WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, so satisfied there is consensus to delete this article at this time...

bounds of what's merely expected to exist for all candidates. And WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument in an AFD discussion, either — we have no way...

‎ The result was delete. The single "keep" opinion is basically WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, which is not a good argument for an AFD. Lankiveil (speak to me) 01:22...

talk page.--Jmundo (talk) 18:41, 8 December 2008 (UTC) Please read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (or the shorter version, Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#What...

The "keep" arguments were basically variations of WP:ILIKEIT and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Sorry. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:42, 23 July 2017 (UTC) AfDs for...

number do have quite weak rationales and border on WP:ITSNOTABLE and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. However, there are enough well-argued comments on both sides that...

(UTC) Comment - @Nfitz:, you may wish to refresh your knowledge of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. The fact that Quillian Roberts is also at AfD suggests that at least...

keep. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 16:11, 9 October 2010 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS Vodello (talk) 17:31, 9 October 2010 (UTC) Not quite sure how that...

the consensus is that she's not notable yet. Also, please read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:31, 23 July 2011 (UTC) Michele Noonan (edit |...

stop.Jdubman (talk) 06:36, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Just because WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, it doesn't make small transit centers like this notable. Spokane is...

arguments expressed goes to deletion. Both keep !votes run are based on WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, while the nominator and delete !voters provided policy-based rationales...

keeps, pointing to WP:NOT#NEWS, WP:BLP1E, and reminding us that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a reason for a keep (or a delete either). Also we are reminded...

·ΚΕΚΡΩΨ· (talk) 16:12, 20 August 2008 (UTC) Keep I'm sorry to bring WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS into this, but Aegean Macedonia can get an article and Northern Epirus...

. --Infrangible 16:50, 10 March 2007 (UTC) As noted elsewhere, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS doesn't justify this article, which would be completely indistinguishable...

additional information added. Only reason given for creation is WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 00:41, 21 May 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

discounted two contributions (one keep, one comment) on the basis of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Daniel (talk) 22:16, 20 August 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

them. Ljh.rms (talk) 23:46, 16 September 2009 (UTC)Ljh.rms (talk) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't a legitimate reason for keeping an article. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk)...

stand-alone list, much of this discussion has devolved into whether WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is a valid comparison or not, which is only tangentially relevant to...

(talk) 11:35, 5 December 2022 (UTC) Keep while I know this is an WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument, every US Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps and Sergeant...

rampage against them. Prizby (talk) 16:42, 26 January 2014 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument, to say nothing of the fact that American football...

Google says [1] [2] Gnevin (talk) 00:35, 29 March 2008 (UTC) see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Your google searches were badly constructed: I get 206 non-wikipedia...

20 March 2008 (UTC)--Seahamlass (talk) 23:01, 20 March 2008 (UTC) Otherstuffexists? Spartaz Humbug! 23:08, 20 March 2008 (UTC) Keep - this is a significantly...

and violation of WP:COI. Also, author asserts significance under WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Redfarmer (talk) 20:31, 23 January 2008 (UTC) The above discussion...

"keep" side of things has provided any arguments more useful than WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and WP:ITSNOTABLE. Ironholds (talk) 20:21, 10 August 2011 (UTC) Avaya...

Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 06:11, 27 February 2025 (UTC) Keep: per WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, WP:Public figure plus notability well WP:RS covered. QalasQalas (talk)...

that do not reference any policy at all, and the large number of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS comments, mostly about Christine Blasey Ford, there is a consensus...

because they are a list.--Avala (talk) 12:13, 2 February 2012 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a reason for keeping. Lists are kept if they offer encyclopedic...

either, and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't a valid argument here. Mangoe (talk) 20:05, 28 January 2014 (UTC) This isn't a case of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS though. If...

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS.74.178.177.115 (talk) 17:51, 2 October 2012 (UTC) Just to be clear, when you say that your own argument falls under OTHERSTUFFEXISTS...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Ignoring WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS arguments and "keep" votes with no rationales, there's consensus to...

policy, instead of Elan26 policy. Notability isn't transferable, and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is a REALLY bad keep argument Mayalld (talk) 20:48, 3 September 2008...

discussing the anthems. -- HighKing++ 14:51, 28 January 2017 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is generally an invalid argument in AfD. "Venezuela anthems" is clearly...

Sincerely, --- Kachelus (talk) 19:21, 5 April 2015 (UTC) Comment - WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid reason for keeping this article. CommanderLinx (talk)...

was moved to the draft space. I believe it was created because WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, but those other pages have content. –Fredddie™ 21:17, 8 August 2017...

made to this page.‎ The result was delete. On the keep arguments: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, WP:INHERITED. Also, just because the list is well-defined doesn't...

my vote. Fifthavenuebrands (talk) 13:01, 15 November 2019 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid rationale. --Darth Mike(talk) 15:35, 15 November 2019...

JSTOR · TWL) 1000 articles is not in the notability guidelines WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS - likewise. Fails WP:GNG. Ironholds (talk) 12:21, 1 April 2010 (UTC)...

something).--SKATER Hmm? 15:50, 25 May 2010 (UTC) Comment Please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, WP:reliable sources and WP:notability. How does this school meet these...

Three SPAs have voted keep that either have a conflict of interest, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS or are WP:ILIKEIT. None of these opinions are based in policy. One...

same area (indeed, two are the same one) and effectively amount to WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. No notability has been shown per the Delete comments. Black Kite 23:54...

(talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:38, 28 January 2013 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. - The Bushranger One ping only 10:04, 28 January 2013 (UTC) If a GA-class...

academics"? In any case, Inclusion is not an indicator of notability. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument. Also, keep in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia...

Again, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Di (they-them) (talk) 02:37, 4 April 2023 (UTC) Forget the leafy thing, you are right with WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. However, you...

references in the article are not reliable sources. Fails WP:MUSIC. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid reason to keep this particular article. KrakatoaKatie...

establishes Wikipedia's notability guidelines. WP:ITSUSEFUL and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS aren't good reasons to keep an article. If you feel that other articles...

information should already be in the relevant election articles anyway. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't meant to be a reason for keeping or deleting but, at the moment...

for DirectX. DJViking (talk) 17:57, 17 September 2016 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Also, Wikipedia cannot be used as a source. Robert McClenon (talk)...

Borderieux. StAnselm (talk) 08:46, 31 December 2011 (UTC) Seems like WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. You're welcome to put those people up for AfD if you want. Jakejr...

than this one.Siegfried Nugent (talk) 00:52, 20 May 2017 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. yes it's a list of non resident ambassadors which can be adequately...

added by Saffronwaldenconservatives (talk • contribs) Comment see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS - that argument won't get you anywhere. Notability of this must be...

what happens when one contests a speedy deletion on the grounds of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. What we have here is a non-notable website that simply fell through...

The "Keep" by Judo112 was given significantly less weight per WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and WP:ITSNOTABLE NW (Talk) 19:58, 19 September 2009 (UTC) Ghost Zoids...

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. LibStar (talk) 07:36, 9 June 2011 (UTC) Thanks for the valuable link. My policy-based reason was, however, not WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS,...

made to this page.‎ The result was delete. DeVerm's !vote is just WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Cullen328's !vote has been refuted enough for a slight consensus to...

"keep" and "delete", the keep arguments fall to the WP:ITEXISTS and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS category. Therefore based on the strength of the arguments the consensus...

The result was delete. Keep-arguments amount to "it's relevant" and OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Drmies (talk) 18:04, 5 January 2012 (UTC) Mothers News (edit | talk |...

(character).--Milowent • hasspoken 21:44, 26 January 2012 (UTC) Using WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS as to whether an article should be kept or deleted is not a valid argument...

contribs) for failing WP:GNG, but deprodded by the creator on a WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS basis. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 13:16, 7 December 2022 (UTC) Note: This...

nominated and your position seems to be basically WP:ILIKEIT and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Nick-D (talk) 10:02, 3 March 2009 (UTC) Delete The threshold for inclusion...

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't a valid reason to keep or delete articles. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:42, 12 September 2008 (UTC) Accept that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (which...

exception. Billebrooks 14:39, 3 September 2007 (UTC) Comment, is that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, or WP:ILIKEIT? Lychosis T/C 21:27, 3 September 2007 (UTC) Delete as...

read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS.--Cerejota (talk) 23:50, 29 August 2011 (UTC) Thank you. I am very well aware of the existence of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. However...

a deep and fundamental difference between WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and WP:OUTCOMES. All WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS does is state that there happen to be other articles...

much better shortcuts for the same thing, such as WP:OTHERSTUFF, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, and WP:WAX. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:39, 23 August 2010 (UTC) Keep both...

Powering Australian Renewables Fund doesn't look notable either. Per WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, we do not copy mistakes from one article (in this case the mistake...

29 December 2017 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Ajf773 (talk) 09:12, 29 December 2017 (UTC) Simply linking to WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is a non-response and adds...

of the year, does not necessarily make the nominee notable. See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS for the argument X article exists therefore so should Y. The standard...

level clubs in Italy aren't. Number 57 22:04, 31 August 2011 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. And anyway, England has the FA Vase to thank. (probably–although i...

list, there is consensus to delete it. Keep comments are mostly per OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Should such sources become available, any editor may ask for the article...

some other fictional spaceships or airplanes have articles, per WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. This airplane doesn't seem to merit an article, as I see it, because...

Inspector cartoons#1966. Been up 3 weeks, The keep !vote is basically a WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument, Redirect is preferred over deletion so that's the best argument...

basis is WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS?noq (talk) 10:02, 5 January 2011 (UTC) Wiki-lawyering also leaves me profoundly unimpressed. And wp:otherstuffexists is not even...

Shouldn't we have a permanent policy if this is to be the case? IMO, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is largely relevant because there are hundreds of articles like this...

guideline like WP:PORNBIO and the keep commentators keep using WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS as an argument. Secret account 19:11, 16 December 2013 (UTC) Kiera...

 RGTraynor  14:19, 11 June 2007 (UTC) For "no more crufty", see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Nobody is claiming that WABC is a non-notable station. For "indiscriminate"...

WP:MUSIC. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:35, 15 December 2007 (UTC) Interesting, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS reversed into "other stuff got deleted" and used as a deletion argument...

going with? Brilliantine (talk) 05:44, 10 September 2008 (UTC) Keep WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a reason for deletion.  Esradekan Gibb  "Talk" 05:46, 10 September...

(UTC) Keep. Although another list was mentioned above, typically WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a good enough reason to keep an article around. However, I just...

limits of this, which comes down to whether WP:NOT applies. Per WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS neither the existence nor the non-existence of similar articles is...

Television and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 16:46, 1 May 2025 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is considered an illegitimate argument against deletion; is its converse...

(delete) – (View log) This page was brought to my attention on WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS grounds. Dancer with only one minor role in a movie (Hairspray (2007...

Let's nominate the others for deletion if you say so, per your WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument. Geschichte (talk) 07:58, 29 October 2021 (UTC) Comment Puerto...

Ezzi386 (talk) 17:21, 19 August 2011 (UTC) For the first point, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. For the second point, as pointed out below, they are directory entries...

least) two distinct articles. This was refuted by noting this is a WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument, as well as the fact that the dispute around Taiwan is decades-old...

articles for deletion goes. There's actually a policy name for it, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Odds are the other article doesn't have any true notability and should...

Tomektadla1 (talk • contribs) 09:05, 6 January 2009 (UTC) WP:USEFUL, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Punkmorten (talk) 10:34, 6 January 2009 (UTC) Delete, I see nothing...

different from WP:LEW. Jouster  (whisper) 14:15, 18 July 2007 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. I don't deny that there are legitimate uses for Wikipedia humour,...

Billybob2002 (talk) 18:14, 4 August 2018 (UTC) @Billybob2002: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't a valid argument. Ocasio-Cortez has had far more and far deeper...

notability either. MilborneOne (talk) 07:56, 25 September 2016 (UTC) OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is irrelevant, in comparison to notability and sources-BabbaQ (talk)...

mayor who said something stupid once, the end".) Also, please read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS: just because an article exists about somebody else doesn't mean it...

point to any offsite sources that could assist, and also resorts to WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. The arguments made by the three delete !votes respecting a lack of...

arndt (talk) 05:53, 21 December 2016 (UTC) Weak keep at the risk of OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, well it does, that is no more notable than this. Just scrapes in I...

certificate. If there are already other articles set up the same way, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS applies. Perhaps the problem is not that irrelevant material has been...

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:32, 3 November 2017 (UTC) Delete. The fact WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS does not confer notability. - The Bushranger One ping only 03:56, 10...

User:Alexander Iskandar - See corporate notability guidelines. Also see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC) Are we ready to review...

refused to do so. Luksaz (talk) 11:55, 8 December 2016 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Otherwise, if you want the article to be kept, please make an argument...

arndt (talk) 05:52, 21 December 2016 (UTC) Weak keep at the risk of OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, well it does, that is no more notable than this. Just scrapes in I...

we have lots of articles on minor places. My counterarguments is WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. WP:BEFORE indicates that this is a generic subdivision. WP:GEOLAND...

Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 18:04, 16 January 2019 (UTC) Please read wp:otherstuffexists.Slatersteven (talk) 18:06, 16 January 2019 (UTC) I knew this would...

Sisters of Mercy. The Keep arguments arguing inherent notability and OTHERSTUFFEXISTS are not as convincing as the Delete arguments centered on lack of notability...

"Brigitte Macron"? Tartarindebergerac (talk) 14:18, 13 April 2017 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS; in any case, both were spouses of French presidents – this article...

articles is not a supporting argument for keeping this one; see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS Spiderone 16:02, 18 January 2021 (UTC) Keep Division I college soccer...

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS says the existance of other articles should not be a reason to keep this one. Corpx 16:41, 5 July 2007 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is...

Please read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS if you haven't yet. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:35, 9 May 2025 (UTC) Could you please read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS? "However, such...

Paul Potts, Graham. Graham Colm Talk 21:18, 30 May 2009 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS Bravedog (talk) 21:24, 30 May 2009 (UTC) This is not painfully invalid...

January 2008 (UTC) Comment The first part of the reasoning is an WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS reasoning. The second part, QF1 is a notable accident as it has been...

editorial policies, no author credit, etc. And besides all that, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS: something isn't allowed simply because you can find it in another...

Parma F.C. strip --Juliancames (talk) 14:07, 5 November 2013 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. GiantSnowman 14:15, 5 November 2013 (UTC) The above discussion is...

would the print media not be notable? I realize this is kind of a WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument, but I think it's a valid one. By the precedents, the TV station...

mentions in a couple of government sites). To the IP who posted above: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and WP:ALLORNOTHING are not valid arguments for either keeping or deleting...

notability. The only argument being asserted here is an appeal to WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. -- Atama頭 18:18, 16 June 2011 (UTC) Comment: I have added some sources...

that these are acceptable but the nominated article is not. Yes, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and all that, but I'm getting the impression that a) either some notability...

compilation for deletion. 216.185.5.254 (talk) 16:27, 15 May 2008 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is basically what you're saying, with a dash of "I've heard of it"...

15:26, 11 May 2012 (UTC) That's an interesting argument - is it WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (which doesn't work) or WP:COMMONOUTCOMES (which might)? - Jorgath...

If (reply) then (ping me) 20:51, 19 June 2020 (UTC) Keep While WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a good argument and some other keep votes also aren't very convincing...

the World. — Tomica (talk) 10:51, 6 August 2012 (UTC) That's an WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument. And I'm sure you agree Rihanna, Usher and J-LO are considerably...

2007 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument for keeping an article. --Strothra (talk) 03:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC) Otherstuffexists is not a policy...

scripts and it shows multiple archives in tabs. it's very unixy. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS explains why this is not a usefull argument in a deletion discussion...

Seems to be at least as notable as Mzoli's Meats. And that's not an WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument, it's WP:OTHERSTUFFHASBEENKEPTBYCONSENSUSATAFD. Phil Bridger...

--Launchballer 23:52, 24 January 2014 (UTC) How is this argument not WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS? - The Bushranger One ping only 04:41, 6 February 2014 (UTC) Relisted...

September 2020 (UTC) Sunshine1191, Good find, you should nominate it. But OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument.   // Timothy :: talk  07:27, 19 September...

votes is not 100% serious, and the other basically comes down to WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. That said, happy to userify if someone wants to move it to a fansite...

education school with some accreditations. At the risk of making an WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument, I'll note that we have a number of articles on other special...

the main article. Dudley Miles (talk) 11:14, 31 March 2022 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid rationale. And we have been deleting/rewriting such...

themselves may or may not pass the WP:GNG) would not either (see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS). If the page is out of date then I suspect that that is because the...

entry at WP:RSP for issues with that source. Also to the 2nd point, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Curbon7 (talk) 18:27, 6 May 2022 (UTC) Delete A small and relatively...

reliable source or explain why this is an exception to precedent. Also WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. causa sui (talk) 19:14, 9 November 2011 (UTC) AfDs for this article:...

Kingdom commemorative stamps 2010–2019 and whilst I understand WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS I don't really see a strong reason to either !keep or !delete this...

are a lack of WP:RS to prove notability. With out sounding like WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, there is a precedent of including tribute albums in the artists discography...

another article about a similar topic is deleted is irrelevant per OTHERSTUFFEXISTS.BabbaQ (talk) 21:09, 10 October 2016 (UTC) Your argument is invalid...

references remain too weak for WP:CORPDEPTH, in my opinion, and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a sustainable argument, so I'm bringing this article to AfD...

evaluated here also? Dentren | Talk 09:56, 29 October 2022 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS applies Bedivere (talk) 13:47, 29 October 2022 (UTC) It may be advantageous...

without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit. And WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a convincing argument to ignore policy. Trainsandotherthings...

per consensus. Reasons given for retention appear to fail either WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS or WP:ILIKEIT parameters. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 21:34, 15 November...

company which means they're not independent. Also, just because WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS doesn't mean this page will be kept. BuySomeApples (talk) 21:09, 27...

the article is unencyclopedic. You should read WP:N and WP:V and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS.-- Darth Mike  (join the dark side) 18:07, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Comment...

page.‎ The result was delete. The available argument for keep is WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, which doesn't address the concerns laid out in the nomination. Kurykh...

this one." My reply to this editor's good faith argument is a) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid rationale against deletion; b) intraparty officeholders...

argument discards two !keep arguments which were very weak to start with (OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and a disputed understanding of SNG v GNG), and from there, there is...

played in the Belgium Second Division and for reasons based on WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. However, the Second Division is not sourced as fully pro meaning the...

and WP:CIVIL. GiantSnowman 10:24, 18 February 2013 (UTC) Comment WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS - existence of other articles has no bearing on the existence of this...

result was delete. Arguments to keep here are mainly WP:ITSUSEFULL, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, and an opinion that notability shouldn't be a reason for deletion...

precedence for lists of hotels of cities" (not a valid reason as per WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS) Ajf773 (talk) 06:53, 17 November 2016 (UTC) I am also nominating the...

notable are nominated for deletion, sometimes things slip through, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. signed, Rosguill talk 00:19, 1 March 2019 (UTC) Thank you for your...

for deletion on its own (don't make me say The_Edge) and invoke WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS ... kidding mostly btw. Jasynnash2 (talk) 16:27, 18 July 2008 (UTC)...

being arranged by sources independent of the show. Additionally, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, this article is in no way different. FishLoveHam (talk) 22:06, 4 May...

National League is not a fully-professional league. Deprodded with a OTHERSTUFFEXISTS rationale referring to 2017–18 Leyton Orient F.C. season, which I have...

delete. Arguments for keeping: Sourced (IMDb is not reliable), WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, WP:USEFUL. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:09, 3 August 2009 (UTC) Athelston Williams...

one. Uncle G (talk) 16:42, 8 July 2012 (UTC) Also remember that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. - The Bushranger One ping only 20:35, 8 July 2012 (UTC) Please read...

dabs. Some partial title matches are also ambiguous. But see also WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:23, 31 March 2010 (UTC) And you didn't clean...

November 2022 (UTC) That's not a reason to keep the article – see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Richard3120 (talk) 02:27, 3 November 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

individually notable. WhisperToMe (talk) 06:53, 10 May 2020 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Ajf773 (talk) 20:37, 10 May 2020 (UTC) @Ajf773: Which says "These...

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:25, 4 March 2008 (UTC) Delete - WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS does not work here. There is no proof the film has progressed in any...

The result was delete. The only argument to keep was an appeal to WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Redirecting to Lakewood Township, New Jersey#Local government seems...

[1]-HARDACAndroid (talk) 19:28, 4 September 2020 (UTC) @HARDACAndroid: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS should answer your question. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|...

editors when taking consensus into consideration as it is based on WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. WP:BEFORE did not find any WP:SIGCOV. Aneirinn (talk) 20:00, 21 January...

relevant than this one. So we should keep this one, too" which was an WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument. The article is little more than a feature list and remains...

(UTC) In the first place, Xu has a few articles about him. Also, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a worthwhile argument. Your references are of little use: (1)...

game data in wikipedia, wikiproject:final fantasy for one. I know WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is specifically cited as an argument NOT to use in these discussions...

Finally, Steampunk Magazine also has a problem with sources, but WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid reason to keep this article. I'll look for sources for...

2014 (UTC) − ::I didn't find it. Wikifarzin tried to use it as an WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument for keeping European Association of Biometrics on RHaworth's...

full internationals. TonyStarks (talk) 04:25, 21 May 2020 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. What makes this topic notable - where is the significant coverage...

rationale is typically explained away in discussions of this type as WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. However, if you want to go there: comparing the level of detail and...

21 April 2025 (UTC) The arguments you have made here are largely WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, which aren't really good arguments in this case and do not address...

contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS Xxanthippe (talk) 03:02, 6 April 2011 (UTC). Relisted to generate a...

rectify the issue. Talk User:Fissionfox 09:36, 26 April 2008 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS to the other article. If you want to cleanup the article, then add...

associated thruways are notable.  kgrr talk 16:30, 13 October 2009 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid reason to keep an article. The fact that other articles...

point that out.Makro (talk) 13:57, 27 December 2014 (UTC) Delete WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid rationale and we don't keep articles only so they can...

articles have "arbitrary" cutoff points, but your argument amounts to WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. And yes, Glen Scotty Wolfe is just notable enough for a New York Times...

nothing. Editors who want to call articles crap can still do [[WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS|WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS]]. See: WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS.--v/r - TP 00:19, 5 February...

nomination Then list other pages so they can be nominated as well, duh. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a convincing argument, particularly when that other stuff similarly...

think that the examples cited as OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and CRYSTAL are of themselves cause for omition. The OTHERSTUFFEXISTS article makes it clear that such...

deleted per wikipedia policy. Only excuse for keeping appears to be WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. DarkSaber2k 09:16, 17 May 2007 (UTC) Delete - Looks like original...

aware of the otherstuffexists "essay" (guess it isn't a policy) and hold that position unless you are intending to repudiate the otherstuffexists argument...

that other JJIF championships don't have articles is relevant (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS). Papaursa (talk) 21:22, 8 September 2013 (UTC) The above discussion...

their own website. The argument given on the talk page is largely WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, the the "other stuff" being ancient articles. Searching for sources...

redundancy, primarily. Keep !votes all sound like WP:ILIKEIT and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. (ESkog)(Talk) 23:54, 27 July 2007 (UTC) Harry Potter family tree (edit |...

I don't see how this website meets WP:N, and no one argue that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, please. — Dædαlus Contribs 06:59, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Keep Fairly...

exist doesn't mean consensus supports keeping those, please read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Namcokid47 (Contribs) 15:46, 27 August 2020 (UTC) The above discussion...

similar topic existing does not make one, or all of them, notable - WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. GiantSnowman 08:27, 26 June 2012 (UTC) True, but we do have WP:OUTCOMES...

many articles on relations between countries (and yes I know about WP:Otherstuffexists, but Category:Foreign_relations_by_country is pretty big). Del♉sion23...

confidence that they were reliable sources. I'm also not enthused by WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS arguments. If the guy's notable, come up with some sources that prove...

19:22, 16 November 2010 (UTC) Also, as per WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS#Deletion of articles, my "OTHERSTUFFEXISTS" may be valid because it can be demonstrated...

2007 (UTC) Keep, I know we aren't supposed to use our basis as WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, but I think that if we have articles about songs with names, songs...

as Obama's however. Still, that argument doesn't hold weight per WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. --Strothra 19:32, 3 November 2007 (UTC) Personally I take that more...

existed (I should say meet WP policy guidelines). See also Wikipedia:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. As it stands, the article reads like PR for Purdue. Jlg4104 (talk)...

(talk) 01:23, 11 October 2012 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS.—Chowbok ☠ 16:43, 11 October 2012 (UTC) The WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS rule does not apply here. The internet...

notability. The speedy was removed back in 2006 along the lines of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. ThemFromSpace 18:32, 8 April 2009 (UTC) Please apply WP:BEFORE. -...

not put into question. Farid2053 (talk) 00:58, 27 June 2011 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. All the players on that list either explicitly meet WP:NSPORT or WP:GNG...

guideline on notability. As for the fact that other stuff exists, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. -- ferret (talk) 20:15, 29 August 2018 (UTC) You have misunderstood...

92.132 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a reason for keeping. LibStar (talk) 14:23, 16 July 2017 (UTC)...

more nationwide. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:36, 24 June 2013 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a reason for keeping. LibStar (talk) 01:30, 25 June 2013 (UTC)...

to the conclusion that the keep arguments largely seem based on WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Just because one has heard of something does not make it notable....

this page, we have to delete all the Steam Greenlight games." Per WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, actually, we have to review the others one by one to see if they pass...

views) (delete) – (View log) This article was pointed to me in a WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS contestation of a prod. Apparently, it fell through the cracks. Non-notable...

this. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:42, 3 November 2017 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument for keeping something. If you think there are...

to delete, defaulting to keep (non-admin closure). WP:NOHARM and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS aside, this individual is notable as the moderator of a national television...

lists of episodes, so isn't this a list of book-like episodes? WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a good argument, but maybe this could be saved if properly rewritten...

leaving several hundred similar stubs alone (much mis-applied reverse OTHERSTUFFEXISTS eventuated, I believe :/). These articles are merely page-size versions...

notability. PHARMBOY (TALK) 01:33, 10 October 2008 (UTC) Comment WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not recognised as a valid argument for keeping an article. And there...

make it more deserving. Netstar1 (talk) 14:26, 10 April 2016 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a reason for keeping. LibStar (talk) 14:49, 10 April 2016 (UTC)...

invalid argument per WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Benefix (talk) 19:18, 7 February 2009 (UTC) "This is an invalid argument per WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS" is an invalid argument...

November 2019 (UTC) Keep Based on the same reasoning as in this AFD. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Did you even look at the sources? Ajf773 (talk) 08:56, 10 November...

2012 (UTC) That is not a valid reason for keeping the article, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Secret account 22:08, 2 June 2012 (UTC) Keep appears to meet the threshhold...

Also, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Cheers! Scapler (talk) 19:47, 20 October 2009 (UTC) My !vote has nothing to do with WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Shoessss is the...

not preclude distinct discussions on others in the future. See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. AllyD (talk) 20:06, 1 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

on it. ThePointblank (talk) 06:50, 31 October 2008 (UTC) Comment WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not an argument. Please consider this article on its own merits...

Delete per nom. You have to be more than a senior civil servant. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is no argument, & if the two New Yorkers are really notable, they surely...

many articles on relations between countries (and yes I know about WP:Otherstuffexists, but Category:Foreign_relations_by_country is pretty big). Del♉sion23...

editors when taking consensus into consideration as it is based on WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. WP:BEFORE was unable to locate WP:SIGCOV for this individual. Aneirinn...

November 2022 (UTC) That's not a reason to keep the article – see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Richard3120 (talk) 02:27, 3 November 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

are not notable"? Both your argument and comparison are based on WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, which in no way applies to this list page and this discussion. There...

isn't necessary to also nominate every similar article (see also WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS). Besides, Yakko's World isn't exactly equal in notability, due to...

of clubs and cities. Fexedyte (talk) 23:15, 23 March 2022 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a great argument for keeping Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:43...

redirect‎ to 2015 World Series of Poker. The sole Keep !vote is an OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Owen× ☎ 21:56, 1 October 2024 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

contains nothing that demonstrates the subject's importance wrt WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Eddie.willers (talk) 23:27, 9 May 2009 (UTC) Since then I have added...

--~ฅ(ↀωↀ=)neko-channyan 16:36, 6 December 2020 (UTC) That is a WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument, especially since the List of Apple codenames never came up...

Wikipedia. It should stay. SPKx (talk) 02:25, 2 May 2010 (UTC) Read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Joe Chill (talk) 02:26, 2 May 2010 (UTC) Would it be a fair compromise...

exists does not mean it meets the notability criteria either. See wp:otherstuffexists. Hairhorn (talk) 19:08, 5 August 2009 (UTC) No i meant how are those...

discuss it? I think that is too much citation. First off, read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Second, your "rewritten" is practically identical to the prior deleted...

wikiguidlines is what your extremely derogatory quote of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS ignores. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS does not stop people from comparing the minimal wiki-standard...

editors when taking consensus into consideration as it is based on WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. WP:BEFORE did not find WP:SIGCOV for this individual. Aneirinn (talk)...

keep this article. Cfgauss77 (talk) 00:53, 9 February 2026 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS Isn't a valid keep rationale. And all the sources you provided are...

articles of their own? 76.66.193.221 (talk) 04:36, 7 August 2009 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not an argument. -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:27, 7 August 2009 (UTC)...

United States, Juba mijotoba (talk) 21:42, 13 March 2013 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a reason for keeping. LibStar (talk) 03:02, 14 March 2013 (UTC)...

Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions discourages. The WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS shortcut leads to another section in the essay Wikipedia:Arguments...

addition, usually arguments along the lines of WP:ITSINTHENEWS or WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS do not really factor in deletion discussions, and you can find more...

consensus. Relisting comment: Discarding SkylightXO's contribution as WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, relisting for further review/contribution and to develop consensus...

WP:MUSIC#Albums. Prod removed because "many mixtapes are on wp" (please see: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS). —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 12:43, 18 October 2008 (UTC) Note: This...

allows non-English sources and that is not a valid deletion reason. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and it's not really relevant how many other games have or haven't been...

Article was previously kept in AFD, but with flawed rationales (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS or meets GNG without sources to back it up). No indication this "rivalry"...

against documenting their discography. At the risk of getting into WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, there must be thousands of individual EP/LP articles for releases...

either, so stop it. Eissink (talk) 12:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC). WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is a poor reason for keeping an article Spiderone 12:16, 3 September...

(talk) 08:51, 6 April 2022 (UTC) @Ddd421: you may want to read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS – it says, basically, that every article should be considered standalone...

contemporaries of entries. --Cwitt93 (talk) 15:55, 3 October 2017 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, which is not a reason not to delete. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:20...

page is. Tom Danson 22:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC) Comment: Please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and Wikipedia:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability. -- Satori...

reliable sources that are independent of the subject"? Also, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and, if you are the Grand Duke, WP:COI. JohnCD (talk) 09:33, 6 May...

NOTNEWS nor OTHERSTUFFEXISTS apply here. NOTNEWS covers news-style reporting, not "don't write articles about recent events"; OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is...probably...

championships." I don't think that the event in question qualifies. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a good argument. A lot of the other articles on middle distance...

also stands or falls on its own merits, not get to stay because WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Newshunter12 (talk) 04:32, 5 November 2018 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

dog (woof!) 12:40, 5 April 2009 (UTC) Unfortunately, that is an WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument, and I usually respond to such arguments that they are irrelevant...

(User_talk:VP44444) 19:29, 22 September 2010 (UTC) Delete - Unfortunately WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not an argument and the other part of your argument fails WP:CRYSTAL...

many articles on relations between countries (and yes I know about WP:Otherstuffexists, but Category:Foreign_relations_by_country is pretty big). Del♉sion23...

historical buildings. - Mgm|(talk) 10:54, 28 October 2008 (UTC) Comment WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS should not be considered in this deletion debate. Michellecrisp (talk)...

was disappointing to see arguments to avoid being used such as WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, WP:ITSUSEFUL and WP:ITSINTERESTING. The rationale for deletion was...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I saw this being used in a WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument in one of the Gateshead season article AfDs and I don't see...

above points to a guidelines without an specifying, also fails per OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, the typical "we can not have articles about everything. irrelevant...

the fact that other debating unions exist is not valid as per WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. the article looks like cruft with large chunks of copy and pasted...

6000 teams in theirs; Italy has 78). This is not an argument that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, because it concerns a single guideline. Deserter1 talk 13:19, 1 September...

seem to be about the subject in question. And although this is WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, there's nothing to stop us having articles on other restaurants, so...

medical articles exist. Seegoon (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2008 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument for keeping. The length of an article is irrelevant...

have millions of articles. It's not a policy or guideline, but WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS sums it up very well. I hope that's helpful. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions)...

tennis events perhaps get more coverage that darts events. See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS in WP:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. Nigej (talk) 15:45...

List of Jericho episodes, let someone do the merge from there, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't a valid agruement. Secret account 22:59, 8 December 2007 (UTC)...

i say keep anyway.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:25, 22 January 2011 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is never a valid keep argument in a deletion discussion. WP:PLOT says...

discussions. North America1000 13:17, 17 January 2018 (UTC) Delete. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is a terrible reason to keep and that comment should be discounted...

editors when taking consensus into consideration as it is based on WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. WP:BEFORE was not able to find WP:SIGCOV for this individual. Many...

DrWhoFanJ make the point that other series soundtracks have articles (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS) - I think there'd be an argument to delete/redirect at least some...

this should be deleted. Govvy (talk) 13:00, 15 January 2018 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. GiantSnowman 13:17, 15 January 2018 (UTC) Delete - No notability detected...

describing vNES has been deleted for similar rationales. That is not a WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument but a suggestion that editors may find persuasive argument...

have even less content. —Tve4 (talk) 22:02, 28 January 2010 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid reason. LibStar (talk) 23:34, 28 January 2010 (UTC)...

2010 (UTC) Firstly, no, they don't. Secondly, even if they did, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument. Ironholds (talk) 11:37, 3 April 2010 (UTC)...

editors when taking consensus into consideration as it is based on WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. WP:BEFORE did not find any WP:SIGCOV. Aneirinn (talk) 20:00, 21 January...

source for at least demographic information. I hate to pull out WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, but if there is an article for every town the US Census counts (many...

can improve it. plantCOAL 02:31, 25 September 2025 (UTC) Keep. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 02:57, 25 September 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

an article. And WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 21:51, 13 August 2011 (UTC) Seriously, don't "WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS" me. I'm replying to...

of notability for this campus society. Speedy declined, citing WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. OK, it is Oxford, but I still don't think it's notable. Jfire (talk)...

November 2008 (UTC) Comment, this seems to be an argument of the WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS form. Can you provide any information to establish the notability of...

directly. Tran5par3ncy (talk) 11:52, 7 April 2009 (UTC) Comment: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument. Also, you have already voted once. --Ragib...

before they were notable - WP:NOTINHERITED. Many such awards exist - WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. What's important is why this award is notable on its own, and I'm...

list of aircraft types as well as of orders by type. FWIW and pace OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, Boeing 7x7 is (rightly) a redirect also. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:35...

suitable for inclusion? CHCBOY (talk) 00:38, 3 February 2015 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a reason for keeping. LibStar (talk) 00:38, 3 February 2015...

not appear to have the secondary coverage to do so. Just because WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS doesn't mean this non notable school article should be kept. Qwaiiplayer...

sense to delete this one. --Kafuffle (talk) 10:37, 9 May 2016 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS Jeni (talk) 10:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

African student newspapers have wiki articles, clearly pointing to WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS as the rationale for creating the article. Roller26 (talk) 13:22, 25...

character with multiple story lines and is well documented. Also WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS applies. noq (talk) 20:29, 8 February 2010 (UTC) FWIW, I looked into...

editors when taking consensus into consideration as it is based on WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. WP:BEFORE did not find WP:SIGCOV for this individual. Aneirinn (talk)...

of the stub. All other band members has separate articles. and yes Otherstuffexists should not be used as a reason to keep but for example in this case...

editors when taking consensus into consideration as it is based on WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. WP:BEFORE was not able to find WP:SIGCOV for this individual. Aneirinn...

the one who are really trying to argue WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS that is completely illogical, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is an argument for keep whilst I am arguing...

at least three times but the Lions fail GNG. The keeps are using WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS arguments which are to be avoided in AfD discussions. Dougal18 (talk)...

NSOFTWARE. And yes, I am aware that we have many similar articles, but WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is only an argument useful for showing we have more garbage like this...

media coverage, and then fade. I realize that this is sort of a WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS point, but I haven't seen WP:NOTNEWS used as a deletion argument for...

lists of non-notable products as long as the topic is notable. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (I know that's not an argument you're supposed to make) but check it...

are a different matter.Nightfury 10:34, 22 December 2017 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Ajf773 (talk) 09:07, 23 December 2017 (UTC) Merge/redirect to lists...

deletion too ? --Roaring Siren (talk) 11:23, 12 May 2009 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid reason. Secondly, police officers would need to satisfy...

basis as they have different, although similar, problems. Really, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS] would seem to apply. --AussieLegend (talk) 22:38, 15 July 2012 (UTC)...

nominated. Why not tag other characters as well? (Note, I am aware of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, but this is a comparison between two kinds of apples, not apples and...

your comment, FighterMcKags 2.0, but anyway, we like to say that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. When we do not work on precedent, how are those other articles relevant...

Parma F.C. strip 1886kusagi (talk) 13:45, 4 January 2013 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Depending on the outcome of this AfD I will nominate them for deletion...

merely a case of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS Spiderone 20:40, 11 September 2017 (UTC) This seems to be a case of quoting OTHERSTUFFEXISTS without the knowledge...

2026 (UTC) Should I add more reliable sources? I do understand WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS but I discovered that this was under the purview of a WikiProject Television...

editors when taking consensus into consideration as it is based on WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. WP:BEFORE was unable to find WP:SIGCOV for this individual. Aneirinn...

Article author responded to notability tag by removing it and citing WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. I failed to find significant coverage in RS about the subject, which...

notability of a cross-categorized list as a group per WP:LISTN. And OTHERSTUFFEXISTS aside, I don't think there is any other country-specific list [2]/Category:Video...

Reliability of Wikipedia. Many of the keep arguments were based on WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS or the fact that what he did was notable (WP:BLP1E). Some of the information...

for the site. -- Evans1982 (talk) 04:39, 21 February 2014 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. How is this person notable? Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:59, 21...

(UTC) I have not looked at the other ones in depth, but please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. If they are as poorly sourced as this one, then yes, as an ATD, redirecting...

article falls. - Ahunt (talk) 17:38, 6 June 2017 (UTC) That's an WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument and could be fixed by creating a series or pattern of similar...

14:26, 18 June 2007 (UTC) Keep at the risk of being accused of a WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument, every county in California has this list, and it would be...

00:40, 26 April 2007 (UTC) Keep. Statistics aren't definitions. while 'Otherstuffexists' is NOT an acceptable argument, the presence of large quantities of...

February 2012 (UTC) Further, I'd like to politely direct Stidmatt to WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS & WP:POINT. -- Jelly Soup (talk) 07:55, 28 February 2012 (UTC) Note:...

criteria. ttonyb (talk) 15:37, 15 September 2009 (UTC) Comment: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. It may be that other HM stars' articles should be nominated for deletion...

Keep so many of these have pages here that it's hard to fight for WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS at some point. JJL 14:09, 31 October 2007 (UTC) Exactly, if WP:OTHERMALLSEXISTS...

for the same reason. DrStrauss talk 16:37, 13 February 2017 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. they are all bigger communities. LibStar (talk) 10:06, 14 February...

World's Best Goalkeeper. --Fayçal.09 (talk) 19:33, 7 June 2014 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS - and those article probably also need deleting/merging. GiantSnowman...

of fairly non-notable roads around the world (yes, I know about WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS!) I guess this adds up to Keep all pending discussion of the whole...

LudicrousEditor (talk • contribs) 03:34, 9 April 2018 (UTC) Per WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, "just pointing out that an article on a similar subject exists does...

author. Decoratrix 04:06, 9 November 2007 (UTC) Part of this is the WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument, which should be avoided. The rest relies on another argument...

(number)#271. It was reverted, saying notability was not needed as WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. If you see 270 (number), it shows many numbers don't have articles...

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Fatcud (talk • contribs) Read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Joe Chill (talk) 00:49, 30 December 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

—Preceding comment was added at 04:37, 7 February 2008 (UTC) Comment - WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS; just because another team's season page hasn't been deleted yet doesn't...

reflected in a wp notability guideline? As to other handball clubs, see wp:otherstuffexists ... as well as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nottingham University...

automatically derived from some common system. PROD removed with a WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS rationale. I'm not seeing anything approaching a secondary source in...

'youngest doctor' article (it survived an AfD), and when told about 'otherstuffexists' said that that was an argument to keep it. How many 'youngest doctor/lawyer/PhD/etc'...

fully professional league. The discussion noted above has clear WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS issues which should not be brought here. In addition to the AfD noted...

~~LDEJRuff~~ (talk) 11:45, 31 August 2007 (EDT) Comment Please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS for a discussion of how to make persuasive arguments in an AfD debate...

without issue in the past. Alex (talk) 15:18, 4 June 2014 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, but doesn't change whether or not this is notable. - The Bushranger...

just like all the others that have articles" WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS also apply. Richhoncho (talk) 10:33, 27 August 2015 (UTC) Note: This...

don't make a claim of notability greater than this. I'm not using WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, but rather asking if guidelines or common outcomes have been written...

Amphitheatre Final Shows"? The argument about the Beatles concert is WP:Otherstuffexists, I'm sure you know that so I have no idea why you're bringing that...

don't appear to have enough sourcing to constitute notability. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS does not cut it for me. SWinxy (talk) 06:10, 10 August 2022 (UTC) Keep:Competition...

(Talk) 07:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC) We wouldn't have to do anything. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Aditya α ß 18:16, 30 June 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

when I search for her name plenty of sourcing etc is found. And no WP:Otherstuffexists does not apply to this comment. The fact that she has a Wiki page in...

22 March 2015 (UTC) Comment - So your reason for keeping this is WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS? JMHamo (talk) 20:05, 22 March 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

reliable sources, and I could find none after a quick search. Also, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument. GlassCobra 08:41, 25 December 2007 (UTC) Warbook...

providing the link target. EREmma (talk) 20:46, 22 March 2009 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS --DFS454 (talk) 21:30, 22 March 2009 (UTC) I was thinking more along...

fictional frogs and toads. n64ra (talk) 19:31, 29 July 2019 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. This article has been singled out because it is a list of free games...

Terry Nicols--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 06:15, 21 December 2012 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS not a reason for keeping nor is expecting a long trial as per WP:CRYSTAL...

GiantSnowman 09:35, 2 July 2013 (UTC) Comment - The nominator should read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS for arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. Mentoz86 (talk) 18:39...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:DICDEF. Prod contested by WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:50, 16 May 2022 (UTC)...

(talk) 19:29, 6 February 2011 (UTC) Keep - I know it's a case of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS but Category:English reserve football teams disproves the nom's idea...

to be a particularly useful argument in AfD discussions as per WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and would !vote delete for all of those as well. As you've stated,...

are a lack of WP:RS to prove notability. With out sounding like WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, there is a precedent of including tribute albums in the artists discography...

notability (see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS). Tollens (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2023 (UTC) Fair enough this is textbook WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS - I change my suggestion...

to the band. Until it IS released it may not ever be released. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't valid reason for keeping or deleting and the subject matter is...

software. TimeSheet (software) has 4 reviews on different sites, many WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS from the page Comparison of time-tracking software has less sources...

basically half a sentence and a footnote linking to the website. Also WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a reason to keep a page. Bettia (rawr CRUSH!) 11:05, 12 September...

Here are two of many Rochester Zen CenterZen Center of Los Angeles WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid keep criterion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by...

to be here more than some other article" - Writing quality and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS are also not good arguments, many articles of excellent quality have...

get multiple awards. I'll reiterate WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTINHERITED, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. MSJapan (talk) 07:48, 17 June 2016 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

(talk) 15:39, 19 September 2019 (UTC) @TylerDurden213: Please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, WP:ITSINTERESTING and WP:ITSIMPORTANT. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul...

double-standard. Cvscvs2 (talk) 13:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC) Please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS this is one of the arguments to avoid here. We don't judge any article...

quite a large number of similar galleries. Consider WP:IINFO and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. No vote.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 07:48, 13 June 2007 (UTC)...

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Arena League (which I know is WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument, but it a similar comparison). Yosemiter (talk) 23:33, 23...

merged with basketball?Undeath (talk) 02:05, 30 January 2008 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid reason for inclusion. Precedent does not matter. DarkAudit...

--B-money84 (talk) 19:11, 14 December 2007 (UTC) **Please read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS Corvus cornixtalk Delete as non-notable. The only sources provided...

stage, was clear enough. Also, the IP's comment uses the invalid WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument (if IP is worried that we keep their competitor's pages, please...

(talk) 14:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC) That essentially adds up to WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, which is not a good argument for an AfD. The main article can easily...

and keep all another. NickSt (talk) 12:44, 6 January 2014 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. None of the individual seasons appear notable. Where is your evidence...

seventeen who currently redirect to the same list. WP:ITSUSEFUL and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS are not really the best arguments to keep something. Fram (talk) 12:21...

to be notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:29, 15 January 2024 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Also, importance is not an inclusion criteria, but notability is....

2012 (UTC) Category:Lists of songs by authors or performers and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS are not policies or guidelines and thus not valid reasons for keeping...

Looks like OTHERSTUFFEXISTS to me. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 16:12, 25 January 2015 (UTC) Have you actually read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS? It says "These...

AviationUK92 (talk) 11:26, 22 July 2023 (UTC) Delete per Oaktree b. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument to keep an article. Best, GPL93 (talk) 00:43...

had three issues to it. --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:41, 16 July 2018 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not an appropriate rationale for avoiding deletion. Etzedek24 (I'll...

Keep, look at Helmet Catch. While I'm not trying to pull a purely WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS vote here, similar to that play there's more to this one that is giving...

Claims that he's better than other fighters who have articles is WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and appears to be more WP:ILIKEIT. Papaursa (talk) 20:43, 23 April...

neither of the two keep arguments are based in policy, rather simply WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS.Onel5969 TT me 02:09, 2 July 2025 (UTC) If there are other articles...

Mentax (talk • contribs) 23:43, 9 December 2013 (UTC) Comment See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS; and WP:COI. AllyD (talk) @Mentax: - there is a conflict of interest...

monitoring systems are kept and this article is nominated for deletion? WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS cannot be used as an argument for why this article should be kept....

basis as they have different, although similar, problems. Really, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS] would seem to apply. --AussieLegend (talk) 22:36, 15 July 2012 (UTC)...

Redirect per Starblind; no information worth keeping in this article. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is no excuse here if the other members' articles have content, and...

Daily Record). Keep arguments on article talk page are based on WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and WP:NOTINHERITED. Still does not meet WP:GNG. Hence: Delete. Randykitty...

Janbryan (talk) 03:50, 15 June 2017 (UTC) So is your argument to keep WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS? --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 15:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC)...

WP:MUSIC. The one hit managed to peak in the top 20. Not to break OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, but we do have articles on other one-hit wonders with questionable...

improve them or nominate them yourself if you feel so inclined. See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Protonk (talk) 04:24, 4 August 2008 (UTC) Delete. The nom is correct:...

June 2014 (UTC) Keep - Seems rather interesting (I'm well aware of OTHERSTUFFEXISTS), but as noted above the non notables/redlinked should be removed....

However I cannot ignore that this biography fails our basic criteria. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and WP:COI issues are not motive to keep or delete this article. Carlosguitar...

Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions; WP:ITEXISTS and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS are not valid arguments against deletion. Do you think that it might...

fraught point. Gotitbro (talk) 01:52, 27 November 2020 (UTC) CommentWP:Otherstuffexists is not relevant here. The contents of the article are not relevant...

individual format? Maxinfet (talk) 06:34, 31 October 2022 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. And the second of those articles does not contain such a list, whereas...

(talk) 07:49, 21 December 2020 (UTC) Delete - WP:SIGCOV beats out WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Bearian (talk) 20:50, 22 December 2020 (UTC) Subject requests deletion...

with African American majority populations. Even without taking WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS into account, the other lists make notable subjects because the lists...

existence of self-published user forums are insufficient, along with WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. VickKiang (talk) 10:00, 22 November 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

whole. This was dePROD'd by another user with the rationale of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS since other similar articles exist, but that doesn't grant notability...

participation from new users in this debate, and quite a few WP:ILIKEIT or WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS type arguments, which I discounted. However, no one rebutted the point...

after the fact that my comment is reminiscent of arguments based on WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, and I do agree with the goal of judging each article on its own merits...

particular reason that UFO sightings in Iraq are non-notable? I know WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS but it seems that the general rule is to keep articles such as this...

per WP:N and WP:MUSIC. Torchomatic and the IP are reminded that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid "keep" argument (nor is WP:ILIKEIT, for that matter);...

WP:OUTCOMES. Chardish seeems to be arguing to get rid of this because WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, which is quite original. However, we have WikiProjects to fix up such...

21:40, 6 September 2022 (UTC) @Madame Necker Please do better than WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (follow this link to see the critique of your argument). Piotr Konieczny...

any case, this is not a valid argument in this discussion, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. --Randykitty (talk) 18:15, 17 April 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

11 July 2009 (UTC) Delete per BLP1E. The above argument fails per OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Just because the project is riddled with BLP nightmares does not mean...

purpose?? Sdm2211User talk:Sdm2211 15:57, 8 November 2016 (IST) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS - not a valid reason for retention. Ajf773 (talk) 22:28, 8 November...

objected to not only the advertorialism but also then making an WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS & WP:WAX comment. SwisterTwister talk 17:26, 11 August 2016 (UTC) Note:...

events, especially with the news source given in the article. I know WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, however we do have articles for other upcoming events see Wrestlemania...

--WhoIs 127.0.0.1 ping/loopback 13:21, 19 November 2022 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a persuasive argument here. The precedents I referenced are...

Tschramm (talk tschramm (talk) 20:16, 27 April 2012 (UTC) Please read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Bearcat (talk) 06:26, 30 April 2012 (UTC) Sources are present in the...

other userbox, but thanks for the evidence-free accusation! Also, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Happy holidays. Gamaliel (talk) 04:14, 23 December 2014 (UTC) Keep:...

mention. Not all groupings of 150 (or 600) people in history do so. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument. Buckshot06 (talk) 00:55, 29 July 2010 (UTC)...

coverage. As far as other fighters go, I would suggest you look at WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. All I'm seeing from your comment is the fact that others need to be...

popularity isn't relevant to notability, IMHO, and the argument is like WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS for [hardly] not a notable entry: or most of the aforementioned list...

editors when taking consensus into consideration as it is based on WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. WP:BEFORE did not find WP:SIGCOV for this individual. Many have also...

keep. Geelongite (talk) 17:37, 27 April 2019 (UTC) Unfortunately WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS arguments aren't valid at AfD as we're discussing if this particular...

many articles on relations between countries (and yes I know about WP:Otherstuffexists, but Category:Foreign_relations_by_country is pretty big). Del♉sion23...

strike it from the nomination. Also, regarding the other Groups - OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. I'm doing the BEFORE to get a bunch of the Group 21 pages deleted/redirected...

been, which doesn't strike me as a valid reason for keeping, and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Otto4711 13:55, 16 May 2007 (UTC) Delete Listcruft. Songs have nothing...

survives well here.--Canoe1967 (talk) 02:59, 12 January 2013 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Keep calm and carry on. --McDoobAU93 03:01, 12 January 2013 (UTC)...

pov. Hoax tag was inappropriate. Just another given name. I know WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, but there are vast numbers of articles on names and if this were to...

10 July 2021 (UTC) Please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:07, 11 July 2021 (UTC) But WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS mentions Wikipedia recognizes that...

this for other years; 1997 isn't being 'singled out'. And remember WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not considered an acceptable argument. SamBC 13:52, 17 July 2007...

Comment Vinnylospo, your argument for keep is a textbook case of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Again, I know you created this article so I understand why you want...

Jenks24 (talk) 12:05, 25 March 2012 (UTC) Michelle Obama is an WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument. she sits on major committees etc. All First Ladies have articles...

different from many Star Wars articles - that's entirely true, but see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. We do have many other articles on fictional subjects that don't pass...

Bl♟ck (conspire - past ops) 10:06, 4 May 2009 (UTC) The fact the WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and would possibly also have to be deleted is not a valid reason to...

party, but adequate to keep. (And by the way, although I know that OTHERSTUFFEXISTS arguments carry no weight in AfD's, it is interesting to compare this...

Alarob 22:28, 7 September 2007 (UTC) See my note below, and also WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. The Evil Spartan 19:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC) I'm not saying "other...

judge based on the merits of tangentially-related articles (see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS). MuZemike 22:44, 2 April 2009 (UTC) Delete. No evidence of notability...

Beer pong is the most commonly referenced one when people use WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS arguments for drinking games. --/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 20:10, 24 June 2008...

knee deep in them.--Brunnian (talk) 14:43, 13 December 2009 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS Aditya Ex Machina 08:47, 20 December 2009 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

arguments in favor of keeping the article do seem to rely heavily on WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, which, while not policy is certainly a valid concept. Additionally...

watch | logs | views) – (View log) Delete - prod removed with a WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS rationale. The article fails WP:PLOT, being little more than a plot...

friendly tournaments. NickSt (talk) 16:14, 27 November 2013 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. GiantSnowman 18:31, 27 November 2013 (UTC) WP:EANP. NickSt (talk)...

comment added by 2.221.56.57 (talk) 06:05, 18 October 2012 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't an acceptable argument. Popularity (or rather notability) has...

Fodient (talk) 03:45, 13 August 2011 (UTC) Comment Please see Wikipedia:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS: the argument for deletion isn't based on the precedent of other, similar...

08:03, 18 May 2026 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Vestrian24Bio 13:16, 18 May 2026 (UTC) I think WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS fundamentally violates the idea for...

listing-type mentions at best, and the argument from SAAFL amounts to WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. On the talk page, the article is defended as "part of an attempt to...

any story which provides in depth non trivial coverage. I know WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS doesn't always apply but Wikipedia doesn't have articles for every...

guidelines is not a good excuse to create more such articles. The essay WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS may help you understand why. If you wish to learn from example articles...

article should be created; the keep argument above is basically WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS Spiderone 13:34, 24 December 2016 (UTC) Delete. Fails notability. SW3...

X is necessarily notable as well; that basically boils down to WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)...

editors when taking consensus into consideration as it is based on WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. WP:BEFORE did not find WP:SIGCOV for this individual. Aneirinn (talk)...