User talk:LaundryPizza03

Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bananana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bananana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GTrang (talk) 04:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As is evident from all of the replies so far, DRV is not a venue to re-argue an AFD that you wish had gone another way. DRV is for contesting a close, iff you believe the closer read the consensus of the discussion incorrectly. That is the closers only job, and I can't imagine how one could possibly argue that there was a consensus to delete at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guite people. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 21:00, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe that it was closed correctly. The keep arguments were too weak in my opinion. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:21, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You've not made that case at the DRV, to the point where nobody, including myself, even realized that is what you were trying to do. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 01:49, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can't reply on the village pump because that page has been protected. Regarding your request for a database report, see User:SDZeroBot/Category cycles, it was run as a one time report, but they might be willing to update it if you ask? 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:04, 10 January 2025 (UTC) .[reply]

Hello, LaundryPizza03,

I see you closed this CFD discussion yesterday. User:JJMC89 bot III has moved all of these categories but not moved all of the articles they contained so right now we have dozens of empty categories. Could you please check on this and make sure these hundreds of articles are moved to the correct, new category they should be in? I don't know whether this is also work that is done by a bot or done manually. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:30, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: The categories are populated by Template:Canadian election result/top and this will need to be corrected by a template editor. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:37, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They are all listed at Wikipedia:Database reports/Empty categories. You are responsible for the CFD closure, please see it through and bring it to the attention of a template editor then. Your work shouldn't require clean up from other editors. This must have happened with other CFDs you have closed, just finish the process. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have already filed an edit request at the template talk page. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:28, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Zhong Zhong and Hua Hua.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 01:21, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]