DOKUMEN123.COM

Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Shortcuts WP:NOTADVERTWP:NOTADVERT WP:NOTPROMOWP:NOTPROMO WP:NOTPUBLICITYWP:NOTPUBLICITY Advertising, marketing...

little if any independent coverage. Also appears to have substantial WP:NOTADVERT and potential WP:COI issues Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 10:06, 14 December...

(talk) 15:01, 3 November 2021 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:NOTADVERT. Lists of "current things" are inherently unstable and generally non-encyclopedic...

would have to be notable, see Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). Also see WP:NOTADVERT. NadVolum (talk) 17:13, 21 February 2023 (UTC)...

Looks like advertising, possible G11, delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:NOTADVERT. It also is written in such a way that it appears to be an article (I...

Darkstar Momot (talk) 04:12, 29 September 2016 (UTC) Delete as per WP:NOTADVERT. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 12:47, 3 October 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

reliable sources failing WP:CORP, and as content and tone violating of WP:NOTADVERT. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 19:35, 13 March 2011 (UTC) Delete nothing in gnews...

February 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:NLIST, WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:NOTDATABASE, WP:NOTADVERT, etc. etc. etc. Most of the list is entirely unsourced and the rest is...

4 August 2014 (UTC) Delete as spam. Article violates WP:NPOV and WP:NOTADVERT because it is written like the "About Us" page of a company website. I...

article written as a shopping advertisement. WP:NOTGUIDE, WP:NOTDIR, WP:NOTADVERT. No significant coverage by secondary sources significant enough to pass...

and Sports. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:48, 7 November 2023 (UTC) Delete as WP:NOTADVERT with no sourced hint at notability. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 14:37, 10 November...

Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G11 (unambiguously promotional material). WP:NOTADVERT, WP:NOTWEBHOST also apply to this run-of-the-mill advertising copy. Thryduulf...

Looks like advertising, possible G11, delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:NOTADVERT. Acather96 (talk) 08:39, 5 August 2011 (UTC) Delete. It's not advertising...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This should be deleted as WP:NOTADVERT. If that's not enough, referencing is terrible including WP:DAILYMAIL...

multiple reliable sources. Although the article clearly falls under WP:NOTADVERT, AfD is not a tool to repair articles, nor should sermountable issues...

(UTC) support deletion and salting WP:TOOSOON and overly aggressive WP:NOTADVERT violations by the sock farm indicated above. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen...

WP:NOTADVERTISING. Tal Brenev (talk) 19:53, 18 January 2014 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTADVERT →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 05:08, 19 January 2014 (UTC) The above discussion...

Speedily delete: draft has been re-submitted and I've declined per WP:NOTADVERT. Promotional to the extent of WP:CSD#G11. DrStrauss talk 20:53, 10 March...

October 2016 (UTC) Delete: I cut a lot of the article earlier today per WP:NOTADVERT, and after doing that, there's not much left. Research didn't lead to...

Music1201 talk 01:59, 18 July 2016 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NCORP and WP:NOTADVERT. Ajf773 (talk) 07:20, 18 July 2016 (UTC) Delete: The given references...

is so poorly written to boot that it's teetering on the edge of a WP:NOTADVERT violation. Definite delete — completely speediable, in fact. Bearcat (talk)...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails GNG. also NOTADVERT / PROMO. Widefox; talk 01:59, 25 September 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate...

is likely that that the article may require cleanup to comply with WP:NOTADVERT; editors are encouraged to continue to improve the article (until all...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete (WP:SNOW) as per WP:NOTADVERT. North America1000 04:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC) Book my flight private...

JSTOR · TWL) Recently re-created after draftifying. As written, violates WP:NOTADVERT and would require WP:TNT even if sources are found. Current sources do...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable hedge fund. Does not meet WP:CORP and violates WP:NOTADVERT. Rusf10 (talk) 04:25, 5 July 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

as an encyclopedic entry, which goes against WP:NOT, particularly WP:NOTADVERT and WP:ADMASQ, ofcourse. Even if we suggest a merge with the company article...

writing tone is teetering right on the edge of being deletable as a WP:NOTADVERT violation — and the article's only "reference" in a single deadlinked...

delete. Consensus is that the article qualifies for deletion as per WP:NOTADVERT. Per a review of the article's Revision history, there does not appear...

This commercial primary school with 50 students fails WP:NORG and WP:NOTADVERT. The references are blatant advertisements, as is our article. (NPP action)...

article is about debuted on March 22, 2017. I cite WP:GNG, WP:PROMO and WP:NOTADVERT. I am also concerned about the other bluelinked articles in Template:YouTube...

serious COI issues that only prove it was written to promote itself (WP:NOTADVERT). P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:07, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NCORP and WP:NOTADVERT Ajf773 (talk) 09:32, 16 November 2016 (UTC) Delete That is just a plain...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article appears to be a violation of WP:NOTADVERT. The article creator, Fatima.Innovative has been involved in a UPE sockfarm...

--Bhadani (talk) 10:16, 27 September 2015 (UTC) delete WP:CRYSTAL / WP:NOTADVERT and content will never meet the threshold of being excessive for coverage...

York. Shellwood (talk) 17:52, 14 September 2025 (UTC) Delete - per WP:NOTADVERT — Maile (talk) 19:03, 14 September 2025 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NORG and...

WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:NIS, WP:NOTWEBHOST (these three rules outlined above), and WP:NOTADVERT. Chompy Ace 23:21, 4 November 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

it extra annoying. Anyway, fails WP:CORP, and also has issues with WP:NOTADVERT, given it was created by a paid account. 86.** IP (talk) 12:52, 3 April...

(UTC) Delete: appears to be failing WP:CORPDEPTH. + doesn't adhere to WP:NOTADVERT. Anup [Talk] 16:38, 9 October 2016 (UTC) Delete – Wikipedia is an encyclopedia...

anyway without AFC approval. Loads of WP:PUFFERY. Evidently fails WP:NOTADVERT. LR.127 (talk) 02:21, 28 February 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

Jim Carter (from public cyber) 07:27, 2 August 2014 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTADVERT. Fleet Command (talk) 07:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC) The above discussion...

using Wikipedia to promote his publication which is against policy. WP:NOTADVERT. He both edits his biography and this article with his account and several...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTADVERT Promotion with half of the references by a purveyor of the product described...

the next tabloid sexpose hits the screens. Wikipedia should not be WP:NOTADVERT playing into her desire to become "famous". -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of...

various single-purpose accounts in violation of WP:IPCV, WP:TRIVIA and WP:NOTADVERT. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Carusu&oldid=1306425136 https://en...

quotes from him about releases not coverage of him per se. Agree with WP:NOTADVERT. JBH (talk) 18:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

Michigan. Skynxnex (talk) 02:22, 13 November 2023 (UTC) Delete - Per WP:NOTADVERT. Blatantly created by User:Frasermarketing which was blocked indef May...

South Africa. Shellwood (talk) 14:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC) Delete - Per WP:NOTADVERT, This reads like an online business card. We know his career titles and...

Pennsylvania. Skynxnex (talk) 02:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC) Delete - Per WP:NOTADVERT. A 3-sentence article telling us it's a for-profit organization, and then...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPRODUCT and WP:NOTADVERT. Sources in article are non-reliable (self-published) or press releases...

Rorshacma (talk) 17:22, 5 February 2023 (UTC) Delete: Yet another case of WP:NOTADVERT. Fails WP:NBOOK, WP:MINIMUM and any other notability criteria. Kacamata...

baseball from the producers themselves, and once I stripped that because WP:NOTADVERT and WP:COI there was almost no substance left except "this exists". There's...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOTADVERT and failure to meet basic requirements of WP:NCORP. Much like other doggy...

January 2023 (UTC) Delete: Currently just a advertisement. Delete Per WP:NOTADVERT 1AmNobody24 (talk) 07:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete, WP:SNOW and WP:NOTADVERT. Article can be restored if notability is clearly established beyond publications...

notability. As written, this is dancing on the edge of an outright WP:NOTADVERT violation — original author User:Timminschamber, go ahead and guess how...

the article lines read like promotional material, which goes against WP:NOTADVERT. Without comprehensive, independent coverage, the topic does not warrant...

company seems to be notable. 🄻🄰 14:09, 13 December 2025 (UTC) Delete:WP:NOTADVERT — Maile (talk) 15:25, 13 December 2025 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

able to find, it would still have to be fundamentally overhauled for WP:NOTADVERT compliance anyway. Bearcat (talk) 20:01, 8 April 2019 (UTC) Note: This...

human spirit since 2003! 14:47, 21 April 2011 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:NOTADVERT. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources which could indicate...

seems to primarily serve the purpose of self promotion as defined in WP:NOTADVERT. P3D7AQ09M6 (talk) 23:04, 29 June 2024 (UTC) Automated comment: This AfD...

totally thrown out even if we did want an article on this, due to WP:NOTADVERT. Should probably redirect to the main company's page. (Clif Bar) if when...

JSTOR · TWL) Poorly Written Article Written like an Advertisement. See WP:NOTADVERT (Speedy Deletion Denied for G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion)...

Thanks, WikiMacaroonsCinnamon? 11:46, 17 January 2026 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOTADVERT. I would also encourage a look at User:Manjeshpv 's Wikipedia home page...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Previous deletions, WP:NOTADVERT, WP:GAMENAME, Fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV. 𝓖𝓲𝓻𝓭𝓲➃➄ ✍️ (talk) 03:53, 22...

suggest notability for the fashion project. If you still think there are WP:NOTADVERT issues could you flag them here so they can be addressed. Libby norman...

unreferenced and the external links are marketing her products for sale. WP:NOTADVERT would seem to apply. Further, fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. 4meter4 (talk)...

Missouri. MightyRanger (talk) 00:00, 25 January 2026 (UTC) Delete : WP:NOTADVERT - This looks like it was created to be an online résumé. — Maile (talk)...

current form this is actually teetering on the edge of a promotional WP:NOTADVERT violation. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 18:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC) Note:...

article about an insignificant firm does not meet WP:NCORP and fails WP:NOTADVERT. Aneirinn (talk) 16:05, 28 January 2026 (UTC) Delete not notable company...

(talk) 14:38, 3 November 2021 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:NOTADVERT. Lists of "current things" are inherently unstable and generally non-encyclopedic...

(UTC) Delete -- This appears to be a very sophisticated version of WP:NOTADVERT for a specific organisation. All of the nomination's points are also valid...

(UTC) Delete The text is blatantly promotional and corresponds to WP:NOTADVERT--Saul McGill (talk) 18:44, 18 June 2024 (UTC) Redirect to Hofstra University#Centers...

(talk) 14:53, 3 November 2021 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:NOTADVERT. Lists of "current things" are inherently unstable and generally non-encyclopedic...

and Business. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:24, 23 March 2024 (UTC) DELETE - WP:NOTADVERT — Maile (talk) 02:55, 24 March 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 18:42, 9 October 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTADVERT & WP:NCORP Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 18:45, 9 October 2016 (UTC) Keep Whoa, firstly...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) 1) Per WP:NOTADVERT this at the very least needs WP:TNT 2) Fails WP:GNG as the vast majority...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) 1) Per WP:NOTADVERT this at the very least needs WP:TNT 2) Fails WP:GNG with 5 out of 6 references...

refs that I can find, none which seem good enough to meet the GNG. WP:NOTADVERT JMWt (talk) 19:12, 15 February 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) 1) Per WP:NOTADVERT this at the very least needs WP:TNT 2) Fails WP:GNG with 4 out of 5 references...

don't keep advertisements masquerading as encyclopedic articles. See WP:NOTADVERT. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:18, 31 December 2017 (UTC) Keep. Deletion is not...

reasons elaborated in the message box: WP:NPOV, WP:NOTCV, WP:CITEKILL, WP:NOTADVERT, and egregious and consistent violations of the Manual of Style—MOS:PUFFERY;...

standalone articles. As written, the article isn't really such an extreme WP:NOTADVERT violation that deletion on those grounds would be warranted — any advertorialism...

non-notable achievements. It fails WP:NOTABILITY, has issues with WP:NOTADVERT, and, just for the final issue, this is one of the articles created by...

out about a concept it's brought to market (I think). Maybe a bit of WP:NOTADVERT as well. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 19:40, 28 August 2013 (UTC) Procedural Keep: apparent...

MBisanz talk 13:32, 12 December 2016 (UTC) Delete Aside from being a WP:NOTADVERT violation, I'm also not seeing the WP:GNG passed here. There isn't a specific...

of the discussion was: delete. Essentially, consensus boils down to WP:NOTADVERT. Since the other pages (sandbox and draft) were not included in the nomination...

article is written as a shopping directory. WP:NOTDIR, WP:NOTGUIDE, WP:NOTADVERT. Ajf773 (talk) 09:04, 31 July 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

this as an independent third-party assessment. Besides, there may be WP:NOTADVERT issues. The tone is very promotional with phrases like a source of qualified...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) 1) Per WP:NOTADVERT this at the very least needs WP:TNT 2) Fails WP:GNG. After removing unreliable...

reliable sources (per WP:RS), and be re-written to read like an advert (WP:NOTADVERT). If not, delete. —Mjks28 (talk) 08:39, 23 June 2024 (UTC) I have gone...

clearly not acceptable reasons for an article as outlined in polices WP:NOTADVERT and WP:OR. Claims of third party coverage must be supported by presentation...

seems to stand only as an example of why we have WP:NOTCRYSTAL and WP:NOTADVERT guidelines. Frankly I think we need to have a broader look at our WP:NBUILDING...

page is just a WP:SPAM, full of company products and services links WP:NOTADVERT. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 15:53, 18 June 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

Restore redirect to Faith in the Future and add Tour section. Probably WP:NOTADVERT and WP:MILL, which sources are derived from announcements, unless theres...

there is zero logic to have an Wikipedia article on it. A case of WP:NOTADVERT. BhikhariInformer (talk) 02:05, 30 September 2025 (UTC) Delete: unencyclopedic...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) 1) Per WP:NOTADVERT this at the very least needs WP:TNT 2) Fails WP:GNG. After removing a...

—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:50, 1 October 2023 (UTC) Delete. WP:NOTADVERT. This article is a content split of IBM Z. For a standard article merge...

talk) 19:55, 26 January 2026 (UTC) Delete. This fails WP:NCORP and WP:NOTADVERT. Aneirinn (talk) 20:06, 26 January 2026 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NCORP.4meter4...

a campaign brochure, rather than an encyclopedia article — but per WP:NOTADVERT, even a politician who did pass NPOL or GNG still wouldn't get to have...

to WP:ORGCRIT. --CNMall41 (talk) 02:02, 10 June 2024 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOTADVERT This was originally written in 2011 as "... is an American CPA firm" as...

tag too. Geschichte (talk) 15:40, 29 December 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTADVERT. The article is full of blatant exaggerations. It has not won the International...

any such dispute on this page. In fact, it appears promotional, and WP:NOTADVERT applies here. Girdi45 (talk) 09:23, 6 May 2026 (UTC) Delete fails WP:GNG...

runs into multiple WP:NOT problems. It's a brochure-style advertisement (NOTADVERT). And this is a true violation of NOTDIRECTORY. I don't see a path to...

--I am One of Many (talk) 19:10, 24 February 2018 (UTC) Delete as a WP:NOTADVERT violation, without prejudice against recreation if somebody can write...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) 1) Per WP:NOTADVERT this at the very least needs WP:TNT 2) Fails WP:GNG. After removing unreliable...

support an assertion of notability), NMUSIC (ditto: criteria fail) and NOTADVERT (fundamentally the root of these repeated attempts to inflict this article...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) First, the article is a direct violation of WP:NOTADVERT because its subject is purely an advertisement device. It is like writing...

really belong in the list anyway, because they end up running afoul of WP:NOTADVERT and the list specificity requirements.My vote could be swayed under the...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Previous deletions, WP:NOTADVERT, WP:GAMENAME, Fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV. 𝓖𝓲𝓻𝓭𝓲➃➄ ✍️ (talk) 03:53, 22...

Delete/TNT this mess. Oaktree b (talk) 14:03, 2 February 2026 (UTC) Delete: WP:NOTADVERT Wikipedia is not marketing, publicity, or public relations. — Maile (talk)...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails GNG. NOTADVERT / NOTPROMO Widefox; talk 02:00, 25 September 2015 (UTC) Keep Running a...

20 March 2025 (UTC) Delete.Redirect to Hitachi#GlobalLogic – Per WP:NOTADVERT. This article is entirely dependent on routine WP:DOGBITESMAN coverage...

It is mostly unreferenced, contains promotional content violating WP:NOTADVERT. Nxcrypto Message 19:10, 19 January 2025 (UTC) Delete the following articles...

Valfontis (talk) 17:58, 2 April 2012 (UTC) I don't quite buy that WP:NOTADVERT doesn't apply to paid editing. Advertising is even a speedy deletion criterion...

It seems like this list is full of WP:ADVERTISEMENTs bordering on WP:NOTADVERT. Conyo14 (talk) 18:55, 18 May 2024 (UTC) Delete. As I recently commented...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:CORP and WP:NOTADVERT. Article was created by an WP:SPA advertising-only account with no other...

the website promoting her branded beauty products as this violates WP:NOTADVERT). Rupples (talk) 20:21, 24 December 2022 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...

// coldacid (talk|contrib) 17:09, 14 February 2015 (UTC) Oppose per WP:NOTADVERT! I myself am the developer of an antivirus program and a backup solution...

nothing but an extended announcement, and the article falls afoul of WP:NOTADVERT. Since some of the group's past tours generated enough coverage to earn...

without notability outside the volatility of it's stock price, fails WP:NOTADVERT and WP:NCORP. User:Iseult Cognsci (talk) 11:46, 10 February 2026 (UTC)...

misuse Wikipedia as a platform for self-promotional PR, in defiance of WP:NOTADVERT. Local media can be easily suckered by a press release claiming a distinction...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) article reads like an advertisement (fails WP:NOTADVERT), with an overreliance on primary sources, for a record label with only...

the WP:GNG and WP:NRVE. Also, the author is somewhat relevant due to WP:NOTADVERT - articles written by paid individuals to promote their clients are decidedly...

unavailable, but it does indeed come across as spammy and contrary to WP:NOTADVERT and WP:ELNO when used in article space. Maybe there is a better way to...

Draken Bowser (talk) 11:26, 28 November 2024 (UTC) Speedy Delete: WP:NOTADVERT. A clear promotional or advertising piece with no claim of notability...

December 2025 (UTC) Delete failing both WP:NOTJOURNAL, WP:NOTTEXTBOOK and WP:NOTADVERT. It appears to be documentation/text to support the work of Kentic Nelson...

AfD. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:02, 21 April 2026 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOTADVERT This is a life insurance company. The navbox is in itself an advertisement...

AFD is not cleanup. 4meter4 (talk) 22:51, 22 June 2021 (UTC) Delete, WP:NOTADVERT. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:47, 25 June 2021 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

Unscintillating (talk) 03:15, 6 August 2016 (UTC) DGG appears to be referring to WP:NOTADVERT. I'm of the view for this particular article that it could be copy edited...

get them mentioned on WP. Note, Wikipedia is not Chabad.org, as per WP:NOTADVERT. As they stood, the sparse repetative stubs would never have survived...

per nom Power~enwiki (talk) 19:39, 8 May 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:N, WP:NOTADVERT and WP:NOTNEWS. The subject does not pass WP:N - the only sources are...

Jclemens (talk) 02:53, 23 February 2012 (UTC) Complete violation of WP:NOTADVERT is more than enough a reason to delete a piece of stub. And you talk as...

reek of being clipped from a candidate mailing brochure. Wikipedia is WP:NOTADVERT. Active Banana (bananaphone 23:17, 21 February 2011 (UTC) Delete without...

exhibit using 'citations' which were press releases or primary sources (WP:NOTADVERT). The subjects fail WP:SIGCOV and WP:SUSTAINED. Over a month ago I took...

Emirates. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 11:11, 27 September 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTADVERT - this is a corporate promotional advertisement. — Maile (talk) 14:31...

blatant violations of the Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, specifically WP:NOTADVERT, is not edit warring. Second, I have stopped reverting long ago, on 08:43...

Retro music11 (talk) 17:00, 20 April 2026 (UTC) Delete according to WP:NOTADVERT and WP:NOTE. If he weren't trying to edit his own page so often the arguable...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) 1) Per WP:NOTADVERT this at the very least needs WP:TNT 2) Fails WP:GNG. A google search does...

could primarily serve the purpose of self promotion as defined in WP:NOTADVERT. P3D7AQ09M6 (talk) Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion...

Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:16, 24 March 2013 (UTC) Delete. WP:NOTADVERT. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:26, 24 March 2013 (UTC) Comment...

and SmartSE that argue he's not notable). I also find WP:CSD#G11 and WP:NOTADVERT relevant - this isn't an encyclopedic article, it's a puff piece; the...

contents of the article but the article also does not comply with WP:NOTADVERT, WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NOTABILITY. Notability issue can be fixed over time...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Previous deletions, WP:NOTADVERT, WP:GAMENAME, Fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV. 𝓖𝓲𝓻𝓭𝓲➃➄ ✍️ (talk) 03:53, 22...

that there is, follow WP:AGF and stop trying to promote the company - WP:NOTADVERT. Where the production facilities are is fairly irrelevant to Wikipedia...

they consist of PR. SwisterTwister talk 05:24, 2 October 2016 (UTC) WP:NOTADVERT is a policy, but where does it say anything like what you suggest?  Some...

printed on glossy paper -- this is a thinly veiled advertisement, WP:NOTADVERT. Note some of the subtle PEACOCKing, "long been the largest", "one of...

"best seller" does not necessarily warrant a Wikipedia article, per WP:NOTADVERT. Again, you misread the nomination: Articles have other problems besides...

see this as being anything other than a backdoor approach to avoid WP:NOTADVERT. -- The Red Pen of Doom 13:57, 5 March 2012 (UTC) Delete - backdoor WP:SPAM;...

sourced this badly, then yes, it can absolutely be nuked and paved as a WP:NOTADVERT violation, with no prejudice and no permanent injunction against the future...

March 2015 (UTC) This is a completely promotional violation of our WP:NOTADVERT rules. The organization probably would qualify for a properly written...

cursory at best. They are not enough to be significant coverage. And WP:NOTADVERT is a higher order policy that takes precedence over notability. When it...

article into a promotional advertisement for the film in defiance of our WP:NOTADVERT rules by removing properly sourced content that didn't fit their clearly...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Previous deletions, WP:NOTADVERT, WP:GAMENAME, Fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV. 𝓖𝓲𝓻𝓭𝓲➃➄ ✍️ (talk) 03:53, 22...

acceptable criteria for any Wikipedia editing at all. see WP:COI / WP:NOTADVERT / WP:NPOV. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:47, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Hello...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Previous deletions, WP:NOTADVERT, WP:GAMENAME, Fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV. 𝓖𝓲𝓻𝓭𝓲➃➄ ✍️ (talk) 03:53, 22...

Harries (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). Pure advertisement. WP:NOTADVERT. Fleet Command (talk) 15:43, 5 April 2012 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFCC#7...

[1] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:55, 1 April 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTADVERT --Lenticel (talk) 01:01, 2 April 2018 (UTC) Delete both - Neither of these...

comments from other reviewers above: I feel that there are several WP:NOTADVERT issues throughout the article, such as "Loh works at the intersections...

This user constantly adds linkspam/advert to the article, violating WP:NOTADVERT. Refuses to communicate back (in case I am wrong) and has an interest...

caution him on Wikipedia's various policies and guidelines, such as WP:NOTADVERT, WP:PROSOURCE, etc. He complained about my removal of an uncited passage...

Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction wrote the article by Thomas Clark fails WP:NOTADVERT. It is a promo piece written by the employees of Taylor Design about their...

between the two. Rajaniphysio (talk) 13:29, 18 March 2013 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTADVERT it also doesn't establish notability per WP:CORP DavidTTTaylor (talk)...

be appropriate for an encyclopedia article. see WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:NOTADVERT. Does your company meet the criteria for a stand alone article? -- TRPoD...

ORGCRITE, CORPDEPTH, and GNG. Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion WP:NOTADVERT. --- Steve Quinn (talk) 12:35, 12 May 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

be an obscure topic that may be notable). All of this is hinting at WP:NOTADVERT and a fail of WP:NWEB at worst. At best, this may be an unsalvageable...

extensive, and in addition their username and SPA editing fell foul of WP:NOTADVERT. EyeSerenetalk 09:24, 20 July 2011 (UTC) Greetings, unfortunately have...

identified as shills or bristle at being called out, doesnt matter. WP:NOTADVERT and WP:NPOV are policy. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:45, 12 July...

the sake of argument that a press release would not violate WP:PSTS, WP:NOTADVERT, et al., a number of data points in the passage were not found in that...

comment. (Did you even check before accusing?) Finally, The Banner cited WP:NOTADVERT, one of the WP:5P which may not be overridden by any other policy, even...

JuniperChill (talk) 21:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTADVERT. MK at your service. 03:09, 4 July 2024 (UTC) (To be clear, I meant info...

{{Disagree}}, per WP:TFD#REASONS. They should also be deleted per WP:NOTADVERT (Wikipedia neither endorses organizations [...]), WP:PROMO (Some people...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) First, the article is a direct violation of WP:NOTADVERT because its subject is purely an advertisement device. It is like writing...

the content per our policies which include WP:V / WP:RS / WP:NPOV / WP:NOTADVERT. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:00, 4 September 2015 (UTC) This image...

etc. I would say that it looks very much like an advert. Please see WP:NOTADVERT, MOS:FLOWERY, and Wikipedia:Identifying blatant advertising. —Wasell(T)...

not comply with several policies and guidelines including WP:ELNO, WP:NOTADVERT, and Wikipedia:Alternative text for images#Links and attribution as explained...

little if any independent coverage. Also appears to have substantial WP:NOTADVERT and potential WP:COI issues Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 10:06, 14 December...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Previous deletions, WP:NOTADVERT, WP:GAMENAME, Fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV. 𝓖𝓲𝓻𝓭𝓲➃➄ ✍️ (talk) 03:53, 22...

WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:NIS, WP:NOTWEBHOST (these three rules outlined above), and WP:NOTADVERT. Chompy Ace 23:21, 4 November 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

would run afoul of one provision or another of WP:NOT (particularly WP:NOTADVERT)—but as Chris asks, is this a real or a hypothetical problem? TenOfAllTrades(talk)...

multiple issues - primarily notability based on WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:NOTADVERT. I made an effort to find references and could only find primary sources...

Unscintillating (talk) 03:15, 6 August 2016 (UTC) DGG appears to be referring to WP:NOTADVERT. I'm of the view for this particular article that it could be copy edited...

(UTC) Delete: appears to be failing WP:CORPDEPTH. + doesn't adhere to WP:NOTADVERT. Anup [Talk] 16:38, 9 October 2016 (UTC) Delete – Wikipedia is an encyclopedia...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOTADVERT and failure to meet basic requirements of WP:NCORP. Much like other doggy...

they consist of PR. SwisterTwister talk 05:24, 2 October 2016 (UTC) WP:NOTADVERT is a policy, but where does it say anything like what you suggest?  Some...

don't keep advertisements masquerading as encyclopedic articles. See WP:NOTADVERT. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:18, 31 December 2017 (UTC) Keep. Deletion is not...

(talk) 14:53, 3 November 2021 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:NOTADVERT. Lists of "current things" are inherently unstable and generally non-encyclopedic...

delete. Consensus is that the article qualifies for deletion as per WP:NOTADVERT. Per a review of the article's Revision history, there does not appear...

per nom Power~enwiki (talk) 19:39, 8 May 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:N, WP:NOTADVERT and WP:NOTNEWS. The subject does not pass WP:N - the only sources are...

"best seller" does not necessarily warrant a Wikipedia article, per WP:NOTADVERT. Again, you misread the nomination: Articles have other problems besides...

advertising pages". As for the English Wikipedia you need to read WP:NOTADVERT. --David Biddulph (talk) 17:15, 4 November 2019 (UTC) What is the Teahouse...

misuse Wikipedia as a platform for self-promotional PR, in defiance of WP:NOTADVERT. Local media can be easily suckered by a press release claiming a distinction...

a campaign brochure, rather than an encyclopedia article — but per WP:NOTADVERT, even a politician who did pass NPOL or GNG still wouldn't get to have...

January 2023 (UTC) Delete: Currently just a advertisement. Delete Per WP:NOTADVERT 1AmNobody24 (talk) 07:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete, WP:SNOW and WP:NOTADVERT. Article can be restored if notability is clearly established beyond publications...

March 2015 (UTC) This is a completely promotional violation of our WP:NOTADVERT rules. The organization probably would qualify for a properly written...

the website promoting her branded beauty products as this violates WP:NOTADVERT). Rupples (talk) 20:21, 24 December 2022 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...

MBisanz talk 13:32, 12 December 2016 (UTC) Delete Aside from being a WP:NOTADVERT violation, I'm also not seeing the WP:GNG passed here. There isn't a specific...

// coldacid (talk|contrib) 17:09, 14 February 2015 (UTC) Oppose per WP:NOTADVERT! I myself am the developer of an antivirus program and a backup solution...

that there is, follow WP:AGF and stop trying to promote the company - WP:NOTADVERT. Where the production facilities are is fairly irrelevant to Wikipedia...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable hedge fund. Does not meet WP:CORP and violates WP:NOTADVERT. Rusf10 (talk) 04:25, 5 July 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

totally thrown out even if we did want an article on this, due to WP:NOTADVERT. Should probably redirect to the main company's page. (Clif Bar) if when...

it extra annoying. Anyway, fails WP:CORP, and also has issues with WP:NOTADVERT, given it was created by a paid account. 86.** IP (talk) 12:52, 3 April...

standalone articles. As written, the article isn't really such an extreme WP:NOTADVERT violation that deletion on those grounds would be warranted — any advertorialism...

sourced this badly, then yes, it can absolutely be nuked and paved as a WP:NOTADVERT violation, with no prejudice and no permanent injunction against the future...

serious COI issues that only prove it was written to promote itself (WP:NOTADVERT). P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:07, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

article written as a shopping advertisement. WP:NOTGUIDE, WP:NOTDIR, WP:NOTADVERT. No significant coverage by secondary sources significant enough to pass...

--I am One of Many (talk) 19:10, 24 February 2018 (UTC) Delete as a WP:NOTADVERT violation, without prejudice against recreation if somebody can write...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails GNG. also NOTADVERT / PROMO. Widefox; talk 01:59, 25 September 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate...

blatant advert until discussions are complete. The current policy WP:NOTADVERT does not allow for advertising services on any page, including user pages...

and SmartSE that argue he's not notable). I also find WP:CSD#G11 and WP:NOTADVERT relevant - this isn't an encyclopedic article, it's a puff piece; the...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete (WP:SNOW) as per WP:NOTADVERT. North America1000 04:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC) Book my flight private...

seems to stand only as an example of why we have WP:NOTCRYSTAL and WP:NOTADVERT guidelines. Frankly I think we need to have a broader look at our WP:NBUILDING...

the WP:GNG and WP:NRVE. Also, the author is somewhat relevant due to WP:NOTADVERT - articles written by paid individuals to promote their clients are decidedly...

out about a concept it's brought to market (I think). Maybe a bit of WP:NOTADVERT as well. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 19:40, 28 August 2013 (UTC) Procedural Keep: apparent...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails GNG. NOTADVERT / NOTPROMO Widefox; talk 02:00, 25 September 2015 (UTC) Keep Running a...

submission was declined. Remove the promotional language (see WP:NPOV and WP:NOTADVERT and WP:PEACOCK), find and include reliably published third party sources...

was disabled TaprootTomas (talk) 14:55, 17 January 2024 (UTC) See WP:NOTADVERT, WP:N Mach61 (talk) 15:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC) I dont understand how...

able to find, it would still have to be fundamentally overhauled for WP:NOTADVERT compliance anyway. Bearcat (talk) 20:01, 8 April 2019 (UTC) Note: This...

using Wikipedia to promote his publication which is against policy. WP:NOTADVERT. He both edits his biography and this article with his account and several...

get them mentioned on WP. Note, Wikipedia is not Chabad.org, as per WP:NOTADVERT. As they stood, the sparse repetative stubs would never have survived...

contents of the article but the article also does not comply with WP:NOTADVERT, WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NOTABILITY. Notability issue can be fixed over time...

non-notable achievements. It fails WP:NOTABILITY, has issues with WP:NOTADVERT, and, just for the final issue, this is one of the articles created by...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NCORP and WP:NOTADVERT Ajf773 (talk) 09:32, 16 November 2016 (UTC) Delete That is just a plain...

quotes from him about releases not coverage of him per se. Agree with WP:NOTADVERT. JBH (talk) 18:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article appears to be a violation of WP:NOTADVERT. The article creator, Fatima.Innovative has been involved in a UPE sockfarm...

the next tabloid sexpose hits the screens. Wikipedia should not be WP:NOTADVERT playing into her desire to become "famous". -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of...

4 August 2014 (UTC) Delete as spam. Article violates WP:NPOV and WP:NOTADVERT because it is written like the "About Us" page of a company website. I...

human spirit since 2003! 14:47, 21 April 2011 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:NOTADVERT. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources which could indicate...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This should be deleted as WP:NOTADVERT. If that's not enough, referencing is terrible including WP:DAILYMAIL...

This commercial primary school with 50 students fails WP:NORG and WP:NOTADVERT. The references are blatant advertisements, as is our article. (NPP action)...

Music1201 talk 01:59, 18 July 2016 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NCORP and WP:NOTADVERT. Ajf773 (talk) 07:20, 18 July 2016 (UTC) Delete: The given references...

WP:NOTADVERTISING. Tal Brenev (talk) 19:53, 18 January 2014 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTADVERT →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 05:08, 19 January 2014 (UTC) The above discussion...

Valfontis (talk) 17:58, 2 April 2012 (UTC) I don't quite buy that WP:NOTADVERT doesn't apply to paid editing. Advertising is even a speedy deletion criterion...

is that articles about unelected candidates almost always violate WP:NOTADVERT. Wikipedia is not a free public relations platform for aspiring future...

--Bhadani (talk) 10:16, 27 September 2015 (UTC) delete WP:CRYSTAL / WP:NOTADVERT and content will never meet the threshold of being excessive for coverage...

current form this is actually teetering on the edge of a promotional WP:NOTADVERT violation. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 18:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC) Note:...

is so poorly written to boot that it's teetering on the edge of a WP:NOTADVERT violation. Definite delete — completely speediable, in fact. Bearcat (talk)...

see this as being anything other than a backdoor approach to avoid WP:NOTADVERT. -- The Red Pen of Doom 13:57, 5 March 2012 (UTC) Delete - backdoor WP:SPAM;...

20 March 2014 (UTC) Some of the applicable policies are detailed at WP:NOTADVERT and WP:COI. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:30, 20 March 2014 (UTC)...

multiple reliable sources. Although the article clearly falls under WP:NOTADVERT, AfD is not a tool to repair articles, nor should sermountable issues...

reliable sources failing WP:CORP, and as content and tone violating of WP:NOTADVERT. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 19:35, 13 March 2011 (UTC) Delete nothing in gnews...

article is written as a shopping directory. WP:NOTDIR, WP:NOTGUIDE, WP:NOTADVERT. Ajf773 (talk) 09:04, 31 July 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 18:42, 9 October 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTADVERT & WP:NCORP Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 18:45, 9 October 2016 (UTC) Keep Whoa, firstly...

article is about debuted on March 22, 2017. I cite WP:GNG, WP:PROMO and WP:NOTADVERT. I am also concerned about the other bluelinked articles in Template:YouTube...

writing tone is teetering right on the edge of being deletable as a WP:NOTADVERT violation — and the article's only "reference" in a single deadlinked...

is likely that that the article may require cleanup to comply with WP:NOTADVERT; editors are encouraged to continue to improve the article (until all...

notability. As written, this is dancing on the edge of an outright WP:NOTADVERT violation — original author User:Timminschamber, go ahead and guess how...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:CORP and WP:NOTADVERT. Article was created by an WP:SPA advertising-only account with no other...

suggest notability for the fashion project. If you still think there are WP:NOTADVERT issues could you flag them here so they can be addressed. Libby norman...

AFD is not cleanup. 4meter4 (talk) 22:51, 22 June 2021 (UTC) Delete, WP:NOTADVERT. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:47, 25 June 2021 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

clearly not acceptable reasons for an article as outlined in polices WP:NOTADVERT and WP:OR. Claims of third party coverage must be supported by presentation...

Jim Carter (from public cyber) 07:27, 2 August 2014 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTADVERT. Fleet Command (talk) 07:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC) The above discussion...

reek of being clipped from a candidate mailing brochure. Wikipedia is WP:NOTADVERT. Active Banana (bananaphone 23:17, 21 February 2011 (UTC) Delete without...

between the two. Rajaniphysio (talk) 13:29, 18 March 2013 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTADVERT it also doesn't establish notability per WP:CORP DavidTTTaylor (talk)...

sourced this badly, then yes, it can absolutely be nuked and paved as a WP:NOTADVERT violation, with no prejudice and no permanent injunction against the future...

Jclemens (talk) 02:53, 23 February 2012 (UTC) Complete violation of WP:NOTADVERT is more than enough a reason to delete a piece of stub. And you talk as...

fix the article. Promotional content is not allowed on Wikipedia per WP:NOTADVERT and cutting and pasting text from other websites is generally not allowed...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Previous deletions, WP:NOTADVERT, WP:GAMENAME, Fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV. 𝓖𝓲𝓻𝓭𝓲➃➄ ✍️ (talk) 03:53, 22...

baseball from the producers themselves, and once I stripped that because WP:NOTADVERT and WP:COI there was almost no substance left except "this exists". There's...

May 2025 (UTC) Because it is not an article, it is a blatant advert. WP:NOTADVERT CoconutOctopus talk 16:21, 26 May 2025 (UTC) Please see your user talk...

comport to basic Wikipedia content policies like WP:GNG / WP:N / WP:OR / WP:NOTADVERT / WP:NPOV / WP:RS. And so taking a random article and stating "mine is...

Football. TarnishedPathtalk 06:07, 8 September 2023 (UTC) Delete. Per WP:NOTADVERT. I'd not agree with the statement above that "All included references...

Andyvphil (talk) 01:34, 2 October 2014 (UTC) yes there is: WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTADVERT and WP:BEANS we cannot allow non-notable actors to "cause a ruckus" here...

appears to be an advertisement and warrants exclusion per WP:N and WP:NOTADVERT. Beccaynr (talk) 18:26, 8 February 2023 (UTC) Delete under WP:NCORP for...

linked to the band in some way, so you should also look at WP:COI and WP:NOTADVERT. -- John of Reading (talk) 08:34, 24 May 2011 (UTC) Hi guys. I got the...

businesses in a promotional manner. The mall does not appear to meet WP:NOTADVERT and WP:NCORP. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 04:35, 11 April 2026 (UTC) Note:...

reverted the edits, which are all unsourced and fly in the face of WP:NOTADVERT several times, but the content keeps getting re-inserted. Not sure what...

However, what violates Wikipedia's fundamental policies (in this case, WP:NOTADVERT) or fails to demonstrate its notability, has no business coming back stealthily...

Andyvphil (talk) 01:34, 2 October 2014 (UTC) yes there is: WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTADVERT and WP:BEANS we cannot allow non-notable actors to "cause a ruckus" here...

don't believe that you took into account the policies of WP:NPOV and WP:NOTADVERT as parameters that must be followed. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom...

However, what violates Wikipedia's fundamental policies (in this case, WP:NOTADVERT) or fails to demonstrate its notability, has no business coming back stealthily...

2015 (UTC) As far as WP:RS it is probably acceptable. But as far as WP:NOTADVERT and WP:UNDUE there are major issues. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom...

promote their candidacies to their own voters, in defiance of our WP:NOTADVERT rules — but candidates are not automatically of enduring public interest...

promote their candidacies to their own voters, in defiance of our WP:NOTADVERT rules — but candidates are not automatically of enduring public interest...

Wikipedia:Notability. --Jayron32 14:02, 24 September 2015 (UTC) WP:CORP and WP:NOTADVERT may also have information you would find useful. -- TRPoD aka The Red...

particularly with regards to living people. (see also WP:ATTACK and WP:NOTADVERT. ) The recommended process for a topic that you believe passes those requirements...

it 07:43, 21 October 2015 (UTC) @Ghbeeri: also take a close look at WP:NOTADVERT and WP:NPOV and WP:PEACOCK as Draft:Joseph S. Goodstein is definite fail...

agree that the content is 1) appropriate for an encyclopedia (see WP:NOTADVERT / WP:COPYRIGHT for example) 2) appropriately referenced (see WP:V / WP:RS...

violations by somebody connected with this station in violation of WP:NOTADVERT, WP:NPOV. Stereorock (talk) 02:43, 18 December 2022 (UTC) Declined – Not...

article that would be anywhere near compliance with our policies such as WP:NOTADVERT and WP:NPOV (which states that we present the subject of an article AS...

February 2019 (UTC)  Done Please be sure you are familiar with WP:COI and WP:NOTADVERT. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 00:39, 12 February 2019...

article into a promotional advertisement for the film in defiance of our WP:NOTADVERT rules, and an administrator does not lose the right to shut that kind...

the fact that other editors have also noted violations of WP:COI, WP:NOTADVERT, WP:V and WP:PEACOCK in the article with these edits and their edit summaries:...

self-promoting. I think I do far, far less ..." is in direct conflict with WP:NOTADVERT. Equally Wikipedia is not a place to to promote a site Google Analytics...

column), or how much of the table is falling astray of WP:NOTDIR / WP:NOTADVERT? Active Banana (talk) 14:26, 2 July 2010 (UTC) The article Hate crimes...

WP:V, WP:NPOV and WP:NOTADVERT. He has stated that I have taken affront because he thinks that I don't understand WP:NPOV, WP:NOTADVERT, WP:RS and WP:V. On...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) 1) Per WP:NOTADVERT this at the very least needs WP:TNT 2) Fails WP:GNG. After removing a...

October 2010 (UTC) And what is the reason for adding the future tour? WP:NOTADVERT / WP:PROMO come to mind as well. Active Banana (bananaphone 15:37, 5 October...

that is candidate for deletion under Not an Advertising Directory (WP:NOTADVERT) and Not a Yellow Pages Directory (WP:NOTDIR) Mysuru-khan-herald (talk)...

particularly inappropriate editors for articles of their clients. WP:NOTADVERT / WP:COI / WP:NPOV all come into play. Active Banana (bananaphone 22:09...

our normal practice is not to include that sort of thing per PROFRINGE, NOTADVERT and DUE. I'm not seeing any compelling reason for inclusion of most these...

February 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:NLIST, WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:NOTDATABASE, WP:NOTADVERT, etc. etc. etc. Most of the list is entirely unsourced and the rest is...

doesnt understand WP:V and WP:NPOV and WP:OR and WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:NOTADVERT; then I will have issues. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:03, 9 June...

could primarily serve the purpose of self promotion as defined in WP:NOTADVERT. P3D7AQ09M6 (talk) Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete (WP:SNOW) as per WP:NOTADVERT. North America1000 04:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC) Book my flight private...

Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction wrote the article by Thomas Clark fails WP:NOTADVERT. It is a promo piece written by the employees of Taylor Design about their...

—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:50, 1 October 2023 (UTC) Delete. WP:NOTADVERT. This article is a content split of IBM Z. For a standard article merge...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) 1) Per WP:NOTADVERT this at the very least needs WP:TNT 2) Fails WP:GNG. A google search does...

seems to primarily serve the purpose of self promotion as defined in WP:NOTADVERT. P3D7AQ09M6 (talk) 23:04, 29 June 2024 (UTC) Automated comment: This AfD...

the article lines read like promotional material, which goes against WP:NOTADVERT. Without comprehensive, independent coverage, the topic does not warrant...

Rorshacma (talk) 17:22, 5 February 2023 (UTC) Delete: Yet another case of WP:NOTADVERT. Fails WP:NBOOK, WP:MINIMUM and any other notability criteria. Kacamata...

appears to be an advertisement and warrants exclusion per WP:N and WP:NOTADVERT. Beccaynr (talk) 18:26, 8 February 2023 (UTC) Delete under WP:NCORP for...

(UTC) Delete The text is blatantly promotional and corresponds to WP:NOTADVERT--Saul McGill (talk) 18:44, 18 June 2024 (UTC) Redirect to Hofstra University#Centers...

as an encyclopedic entry, which goes against WP:NOT, particularly WP:NOTADVERT and WP:ADMASQ, ofcourse. Even if we suggest a merge with the company article...

company seems to be notable. 🄻🄰 14:09, 13 December 2025 (UTC) Delete:WP:NOTADVERT — Maile (talk) 15:25, 13 December 2025 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

Michigan. Skynxnex (talk) 02:22, 13 November 2023 (UTC) Delete - Per WP:NOTADVERT. Blatantly created by User:Frasermarketing which was blocked indef May...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTADVERT Promotion with half of the references by a purveyor of the product described...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) 1) Per WP:NOTADVERT this at the very least needs WP:TNT 2) Fails WP:GNG. After removing unreliable...

and Business. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:24, 23 March 2024 (UTC) DELETE - WP:NOTADVERT — Maile (talk) 02:55, 24 March 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

runs into multiple WP:NOT problems. It's a brochure-style advertisement (NOTADVERT). And this is a true violation of NOTDIRECTORY. I don't see a path to...

support an assertion of notability), NMUSIC (ditto: criteria fail) and NOTADVERT (fundamentally the root of these repeated attempts to inflict this article...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPRODUCT and WP:NOTADVERT. Sources in article are non-reliable (self-published) or press releases...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) 1) Per WP:NOTADVERT this at the very least needs WP:TNT 2) Fails WP:GNG. After removing unreliable...

and Sports. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:48, 7 November 2023 (UTC) Delete as WP:NOTADVERT with no sourced hint at notability. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 14:37, 10 November...

to WP:ORGCRIT. --CNMall41 (talk) 02:02, 10 June 2024 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOTADVERT This was originally written in 2011 as "... is an American CPA firm" as...

page is just a WP:SPAM, full of company products and services links WP:NOTADVERT. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 15:53, 18 June 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

JSTOR · TWL) Poorly Written Article Written like an Advertisement. See WP:NOTADVERT (Speedy Deletion Denied for G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion)...

refs that I can find, none which seem good enough to meet the GNG. WP:NOTADVERT JMWt (talk) 19:12, 15 February 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

AfD. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:02, 21 April 2026 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOTADVERT This is a life insurance company. The navbox is in itself an advertisement...

reliable sources (per WP:RS), and be re-written to read like an advert (WP:NOTADVERT). If not, delete. —Mjks28 (talk) 08:39, 23 June 2024 (UTC) I have gone...

Misapplication of Policies: The user often justifies these deletions by citing WP:NOTADVERT, WP:RS, WP:NOT, and WP:BOOSTER, but fails to provide concrete explanations...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) 1) Per WP:NOTADVERT this at the very least needs WP:TNT 2) Fails WP:GNG as the vast majority...

printed on glossy paper -- this is a thinly veiled advertisement, WP:NOTADVERT. Note some of the subtle PEACOCKing, "long been the largest", "one of...

Draken Bowser (talk) 11:26, 28 November 2024 (UTC) Speedy Delete: WP:NOTADVERT. A clear promotional or advertising piece with no claim of notability...

without notability outside the volatility of it's stock price, fails WP:NOTADVERT and WP:NCORP. User:Iseult Cognsci (talk) 11:46, 10 February 2026 (UTC)...

(UTC) I think the NPOV tag is appropriate. Some guides to read are WP:NOTADVERT and MOS:FLOWERY, and just the WP:NPOV page in general. I don't see how...

multiple issues - primarily notability based on WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:NOTADVERT. I made an effort to find references and could only find primary sources...

20 March 2025 (UTC) Delete.Redirect to Hitachi#GlobalLogic – Per WP:NOTADVERT. This article is entirely dependent on routine WP:DOGBITESMAN coverage...

any such dispute on this page. In fact, it appears promotional, and WP:NOTADVERT applies here. Girdi45 (talk) 09:23, 6 May 2026 (UTC) Delete fails WP:GNG...

ORGCRITE, CORPDEPTH, and GNG. Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion WP:NOTADVERT. --- Steve Quinn (talk) 12:35, 12 May 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

Emirates. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 11:11, 27 September 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTADVERT - this is a corporate promotional advertisement. — Maile (talk) 14:31...

Thanks, WikiMacaroonsCinnamon? 11:46, 17 January 2026 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOTADVERT. I would also encourage a look at User:Manjeshpv 's Wikipedia home page...

tag too. Geschichte (talk) 15:40, 29 December 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTADVERT. The article is full of blatant exaggerations. It has not won the International...

exhibit using 'citations' which were press releases or primary sources (WP:NOTADVERT). The subjects fail WP:SIGCOV and WP:SUSTAINED. Over a month ago I took...

be an obscure topic that may be notable). All of this is hinting at WP:NOTADVERT and a fail of WP:NWEB at worst. At best, this may be an unsalvageable...

anyway without AFC approval. Loads of WP:PUFFERY. Evidently fails WP:NOTADVERT. LR.127 (talk) 02:21, 28 February 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

Restore redirect to Faith in the Future and add Tour section. Probably WP:NOTADVERT and WP:MILL, which sources are derived from announcements, unless theres...

nothing but an extended announcement, and the article falls afoul of WP:NOTADVERT. Since some of the group's past tours generated enough coverage to earn...

(UTC) Delete -- This appears to be a very sophisticated version of WP:NOTADVERT for a specific organisation. All of the nomination's points are also valid...

Retro music11 (talk) 17:00, 20 April 2026 (UTC) Delete according to WP:NOTADVERT and WP:NOTE. If he weren't trying to edit his own page so often the arguable...

Delete/TNT this mess. Oaktree b (talk) 14:03, 2 February 2026 (UTC) Delete: WP:NOTADVERT Wikipedia is not marketing, publicity, or public relations. — Maile (talk)...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) article reads like an advertisement (fails WP:NOTADVERT), with an overreliance on primary sources, for a record label with only...

there is zero logic to have an Wikipedia article on it. A case of WP:NOTADVERT. BhikhariInformer (talk) 02:05, 30 September 2025 (UTC) Delete: unencyclopedic...

JuniperChill (talk) 21:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTADVERT. MK at your service. 03:09, 4 July 2024 (UTC) (To be clear, I meant info...

really belong in the list anyway, because they end up running afoul of WP:NOTADVERT and the list specificity requirements.My vote could be swayed under the...

Missouri. MightyRanger (talk) 00:00, 25 January 2026 (UTC) Delete : WP:NOTADVERT - This looks like it was created to be an online résumé. — Maile (talk)...

this as an independent third-party assessment. Besides, there may be WP:NOTADVERT issues. The tone is very promotional with phrases like a source of qualified...

Football. TarnishedPathtalk 06:07, 8 September 2023 (UTC) Delete. Per WP:NOTADVERT. I'd not agree with the statement above that "All included references...

fix the article. Promotional content is not allowed on Wikipedia per WP:NOTADVERT and cutting and pasting text from other websites is generally not allowed...

article about an insignificant firm does not meet WP:NCORP and fails WP:NOTADVERT. Aneirinn (talk) 16:05, 28 January 2026 (UTC) Delete not notable company...

businesses in a promotional manner. The mall does not appear to meet WP:NOTADVERT and WP:NCORP. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 04:35, 11 April 2026 (UTC) Note:...

reasons elaborated in the message box: WP:NPOV, WP:NOTCV, WP:CITEKILL, WP:NOTADVERT, and egregious and consistent violations of the Manual of Style—MOS:PUFFERY;...

other editors agreed was an apt description of the article state per WP:NOTADVERT & WP:WHITEWASH. Frankly, the only real problem with my editing you've...

It is mostly unreferenced, contains promotional content violating WP:NOTADVERT. Nxcrypto Message 19:10, 19 January 2025 (UTC) Delete the following articles...

December 2025 (UTC) Delete failing both WP:NOTJOURNAL, WP:NOTTEXTBOOK and WP:NOTADVERT. It appears to be documentation/text to support the work of Kentic Nelson...

unreferenced and the external links are marketing her products for sale. WP:NOTADVERT would seem to apply. Further, fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. 4meter4 (talk)...

South Africa. Shellwood (talk) 14:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC) Delete - Per WP:NOTADVERT, This reads like an online business card. We know his career titles and...

York. Shellwood (talk) 17:52, 14 September 2025 (UTC) Delete - per WP:NOTADVERT — Maile (talk) 19:03, 14 September 2025 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NORG and...

but it should be obvious why it is advertising. You may wish to read WP:NOTADVERT. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 13:49, 12 December 2023 (UTC) Admins might...

talk) 19:55, 26 January 2026 (UTC) Delete. This fails WP:NCORP and WP:NOTADVERT. Aneirinn (talk) 20:06, 26 January 2026 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NCORP.4meter4...

@TrademarkedTarantula, and welcome to the Teahouse. There's information at WP:NOTADVERT. We want to describe the subject by neutrally summarizing what reliable...

defend the inclusion of one of the articles in the RfC, but I think a case for deletion could have been made for the other one (based on WP:NOTADVERT....

JSTOR · TWL) Recently re-created after draftifying. As written, violates WP:NOTADVERT and would require WP:TNT even if sources are found. Current sources do...

do better? Bieneba (talk) 13:39, 17 February 2023 (UTC) Please see WP:NOTADVERT. Shantavira|feed me 09:47, 17 February 2023 (UTC) Speedy deleted. David...

multiple issues - primarily notability based on WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:NOTADVERT. There's a brief discussion I started on the talk page, but since both...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Previous deletions, WP:NOTADVERT, WP:GAMENAME, Fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV. 𝓖𝓲𝓻𝓭𝓲➃➄ ✍️ (talk) 03:53, 22...

It seems like this list is full of WP:ADVERTISEMENTs bordering on WP:NOTADVERT. Conyo14 (talk) 18:55, 18 May 2024 (UTC) Delete. As I recently commented...

guides, travelogues, and the like) PRIMARY#5 ABOUTSELF#5 NOTEVERYTHING NOTADVERT (Wikipedia articles about a person, company or organization are not an...

which Springee found not be an impartial, but as other editors noted, WP:NOTADVERT. Gays Against Groomers: Some sources were yellow at RSP was the only complaint...

article still retains the first image. You can argue about WP:POV and WP:NOTADVERT, but I can twist the POV argument the other way, and say that via actively...

like me to cite some policies, here are a few: WP:PROMO, WP:NCORP, WP:NOTADVERT... Also, what policy have I broken? TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 00:58,...

various single-purpose accounts in violation of WP:IPCV, WP:TRIVIA and WP:NOTADVERT. DonCalo (talk) 08:15, 4 September 2025 (UTC) Semi-protected for a period...

guides, travelogues, and the like) PRIMARY#5 ABOUTSELF#5 NOTEVERYTHING NOTADVERT (Wikipedia articles about a person, company or organization are not an...