DOKUMEN123.COM

script that highlights sources based on reliability RSP-to-JSON, a user script that converts the RSP table to machine-readable JSON format This is the case...

Shortcut WP:RSP RFC 2025WP:RSP RFC 2025 The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section...

oldschool-rsps.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports:...

at WP:RSP#Sources, where the full descriptions can be found. In the event of a conflict between this page and the main RSP page, defer to RSP. A source...

slasher or horror genre) User:Ched/movie-reference#Books Shortcuts WP:RSP/BLURAYWP:RSP/BLURAY WP:RS/CBMWP:RS/CBM WP:RS/IMDBWP:RS/IMDB WP:RS/VALNETWP:RS/VALNET...

NBN Co used "PoI" in the business plan. Other than the "resell" rule for RSPs mentioned in the article, there is not other requirements for accessing the...

however feel fairly strongly that we need some sort of broad explanation in RSPS, to inform readers how the list is made and its intended use, most importantly...

mostly right-wing sources (out of the 5 deprecated/banned sources on WP:RSP, only Occupy Democrats is listed on adfontesmedia.com as left-wing). The...

The Newsweek walkthrough is also not considered reliable according to WP:RSPS, and the Common Sense Media source doesn't even appear to be an actual review...

--Goldsztajn (talk) 09:06, 26 March 2020 (UTC) Comment; the CPM, CPI, AIFB and RSP have consistently contested national elections from 1980 to 2014 under a...

reliable and The Daily Dot and Dexerto are marginally reliable according to WP:RSPS. I think the problem may be that the article fails WP:SUSTAINED. Not1Soul...

Wikipedia:RSPS operates. "But it is an essay" is not a good excuse for using one of these sources listed. Similarly, "It's listed at RSPS" is not an...

not appear reliable, The Times of India is a questionable source per WP:RSPS, and BollySpice is a primary source. A WP:BEFORE only found social media...

usable for notability per WP:RSP - David Gerard (talk) 17:27, 6 December 2021 (UTC) Firstly there was not a consensus per WP:RSP for Techcrunch not being...

see a few sources that have made it to WP:RSP as "generally reliable" or a few sources that are not on RSP but appear reliable. However, the reliability...

see a few sources that have made it to WP:RSP as "generally reliable" or a few sources that are not on RSP but appear reliable. However, the reliability...

refs 224 and 229 on the main article need to be removed or replaced per WP:RSP on International Business Times, HuffPost contributors, People's reliability...

price war" from BBC (RSP entry) "Xiaomi’s new Pocophone F1 undercuts rivals with a low price and high-end processor" from The Verge (RSP entry) "Finally,...

Wikipedia is not an IMDb mirror. It is considered unreliable per WP:ELP, WP:RSPS, and WP:RS/IMDB. Wikipedia is also not a crystal ball so if there are sources...

Forbes articles are Forbes contributors, which per RSP is not RS. Bloomberg Profiles is not RS per RSP. That leaves one source, which arguably isn't significant...

and The Village Voice at WP:RSP.--Filmomusico (talk) 03:04, 15 August 2021 (UTC) Not every source will be listed at WP:RSP. The first line of the page...

itself is of potentially questionable notability (also not listed at WP:RSP), this is the first source with any depth whatsoever, though only half of...

editor found?  Card Zero  (talk) 19:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC) If you read the RSPS summary, Metacritic is reliable for review aggregation and news. It's not...

Template:Wikia mw:Wikia Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Fandom: The RSP entry for Fandom, formerly known as Wikia. This page is a list of project...

proof needs to be offered. IMDb is not a reliable source (See: WP:ELP, WP:RSPS, and WP:RS/IMDB), and creating articles then one day (maybe) in the future...

Keep clearly meets GNG with coverage in generally reliable sources (per RSP) that cannot be overriden by a WP:LOCALCONSENSUS, and yes that includes AVN...

debate as to whether Genius is a reliable source in this context as per WP:RSPS. I have conducted a few searches and I can't find any coverage of this band...

one does not seem reliable per Chinese RSPS Liberty Times source appears to be currently discussed in Chinese RSPS I'm going to assume that it is reliable...

(talk) 22:21, 28 February 2023 (UTC) Reddit and last.fm are deprecated at WP:RSPS Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:03, 28 February 2023 (UTC) Delete Only two of...

deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 08:22, 20 May 2014 (UTC) Keep. RSP is a recognized state party, with national presence. I would oppose using...

for link grinderscape.org gives: grinderscape.org (User en:User:DesolaceRsps has focus for link grinderscape.org) Link is not on the Monitorlist. None...

for link grinderscape.org gives: grinderscape.org (User en:User:DesolaceRsps has focus for link grinderscape.org) Link is not on the Monitorlist. None...

media or churnalism). --CNMall41 (talk) 20:02, 11 October 2025 (UTC) Per RSPS, WP:THEHINDU is a reliable source. Discrediting an article written by a reliable...

RFC close amended by ProcrastinatingReader and WP:RSP entry updated with that close. Yes, I'm involved, so if somebody wants to revert this close feel...

reliability. Per WP:RSP, TorrentFreak counts towards reliability. Neither Gigazine or Xakep have coverage on en wikipedia or WP:RSP. I translated articles...

about it, To lessen confusion I will refer to the non-article page as WP:RSP. WP:CIRC is unfixably violated. The policy is "Also, do not use websites...

on WP:RSP as "Most editors consider Democracy Now! a partisan source whose statements should be attributed." Source 7: Daily Kos, which per RSP is "generally...

WP:COATRACK for the RSPN (rural support programmes network, formerly Agha Khan RSP) which is a charity or a group of charities (I am not sure). I am uncomfortable...

inherent indication of reliability. Sources which have been covered by WP:RSP, WP:NPPSG, or WT:HOCKEY are marked with the relevant symbol. Generally reliable...

author is a CONTRIBUTOR, and it is most definitely unacceptable, per WP:RSP. See "Huffington Post contributors". Graywalls (talk) 03:38, 22 May 2020...

perennial-sources-legend > ul > li { margin-bottom: 1em; } /* Shortcut */ .wp-rsp-sc { font-size: 80%; font-weight: bold; background-color: var(--background-color-base...

just under eleven-hundred articles despite being marked as WP:GUNREL at WP:RSP. It's awaiting a close (I assume it will be an admin close), but I would...

Hotel, a primary source. Reference 2 is The Daily Mirror, discussed at WP:RSP and categorised as "The source is marginally reliable (i.e. neither generally...

reliable. Self-published blog with no named authors or staff. AllMusic (RSP entry): Indiscriminate. AllMusic entries with no staff reviews do not count...

to: Wikipedia:TIMESOFINDIA, Wikipedia:RSP entry for The Times of India Wikipedia:TIMESOFISRAEL, Wikipedia:RSP entry for The Times of Israel This page...

news", local newspapers) Trade publications Any source listed as green at WP:RSP would be at least in this tier Example: Brian McCollum (August 16, 2018)...

Keep. The article cites AVN with multiple sources which is listed on WP:RSP as a generally reliable source, as well as CNBC which a major American business...

seems to me that the undetailed coverage of the RSP only exists because of the SP, not because the RSP has done anything notable (yet). Yue🌙 22:00, 19...

listed on WP:RSPS, I think it's fine, but debatable 2 Quartz Listed on WP:RSPS as "generally reliable" 3 Chicago Tribune not listed on RSPS, I think it's...

(UTC) Delete Both of the current sources are listed as unreliable on WP:RSPS. I can't find anything reliable enough to even mention in Robert Anton Wilson...

2021 (UTC) Keep. I see refs to CNET, which is a RS per WP:RSP, and PC World, which isn't on RSP but I cannot think of why it would be an unreliable soruce...

more or less useful than a blog, printed and bound. Take a look at our WP:RSP entry. The other source is not obviously garbage, but it's not obviously...

Hindu (RSP entry) ("generally reliable"), Vanity Fair (RSP entry) ("generally reliable"), The Print (no RSP entry, I don't know), and Newsweek (RSP entry)...

itself is of potentially questionable notability (also not listed at WP:RSP), this is the first source with any depth whatsoever metal archives is explicitly...

they should be transcluded into the list in all-caps and prefixed with WP:RSP as a shortcut (which automatically updates when the templates are moved)...

at WP:RSP[3][4]. Yahoo! News is considered generally reliable at WP:RSP[5], The New Zealand Herald is considered generally reliable at WP:RSP[6] (though...

consensus that Gawker, Cracked, and Metro were unreliable, and didn't have WP:RSP as a handy link demonstrating as much. Basically what we have is an article...

other is a Greek source with unknown reliability and unlisted status on WP:RSPS. Helper201 (talk) 20:38, 10 March 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

be from publications close to the subject, none of which are listed on WP:RSP there is no indication of WP:ANYBIO the only accolade they have is a mention...

is a generally unreliable source per RSP), or from The Washington Times which is only marginally reliable on RSP. Culture and Media Institute doesn't...

requirements, as it is a contributor piece and thus fails WP:FORBESCON on WP:RSP. --Kbabej (talk) 16:49, 11 March 2022 (UTC) Delete is my vote, no notable...

releases, unreliable and deprecated or social media. Go take a long read of WP:RSP. CUPIDICAE💕 20:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC) Not even a single reference mentioned...

article, which doesn't alleviate this any, nor does its absence from WP:RSP. not RS per WP:MUSICRS due to the fact that it is from before 2009 metal-archives...

usage of Forbes contributors and the Evening Standard is unreliable per WP:RSP, also some sources are cited as publisher sometimes but website on others...

well past its heydays, and its online footprint isn't great. I note this "RSP did not fail to cast its net wide enough to reach the student community ...

reliable for sports coverage (EssentiallySports, MiddleEasy, Sportskeeda per WP:RSP), the independent reliable source coverage amounts to a 2015 MMA Mania suspension...

sources. Not suitable for BLPs. See here. Marked "generally unreliable" by WP:RSP Cites other unreliable sources. No proven oversite. Can be used for interviews...

I have been slowly nursing it up to standard ever since, consulting WP:RSP and Nikkimaria for its sourcing, Nick-D for neutrality purposes and Gerda...

two accounts. Yesterday, RSP created Drew Boleen, Ricky Stoenz, Marty Farina, and Rob Dohr (baseball). Today, after I gave RSP a level 4 warning, comes...

Billboard and Vogue (RSP entry) are clearly not gossip rags; People magazine is considered reliable enough for BLPs as well (RSP entry). These three articles...

17:34:47 (UTC): User 201.25.166.242 t • c • dc • l • ef • b • bl; (4) to RSP (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (diff  !top) - Link: rspsoftware...

Çatak himself. I know Daily Sabah of Ref 3 is tagged as unreliable at WP:RSPS, but it's definitely reliable for non-controversial stuff, which this source...

sources used - I saw a couple that have been flagged as unreliable at WP:RSP. Nikkimaria (talk) 11:31, 19 May 2021 (UTC) fn 18: YouTube video published...

there are a lot of Christianity Today mentions. CT doesn't appear on WP:RSP (positively or negatively), and I'm not sure it's quite neutral enough to...

Who's Who (UK) is also considered generally unreliable per consensus at WP:RSP. Pilaz (talk) 14:28, 23 February 2022 (UTC) Withdrawn. Meets WP:NPOL, although...

This website is used as a reference in 2,447 articles and is listed on WP:RSPS as 'generally unreliable'.[1] Orange sticker (talk) 17:01, 22 September 2024...

(NPP source guide) Documentation: Based on {{RSP entry}}...

(talk • contribs) 15:06, 19 July 2021 (UTC) TechCrunch is yellow-rated on WP:RSP. It is a questionably reliable source. In particular, it fails WP:ORGIND...

WP:SIGCOV in WP:RSPS. Can these be highlighted? Nnev66 (talk) 18:21, 2 April 2025 (UTC) Delete I too, was inclined to !vote delete on SIGCOV and RSPS grounds...

selection of site home pages, both on and off the RSPS list. By this objective measure, several sites on RSPS put heavier emphasis on advertising than a site...

Times,[5] not discussed in WP:RSP, but it looks reasonably reliable. Two articles in Eastern Eye,[6][7] not discussed in WP:RSP but it is a UK-based weekly...

consistency, WordPress should not be used in the awards and nominations one per WP:RSP and the lead of songs recorded should be cut down to four paras to comply...

@Hatchens, I agree with you here, the article does look like a promotion but WP:RSP records WP:FORBES as "generally reliable". - SUN EYE 1 17:12, 20 January...

three of the sites I mentioned are reliable sources -- I've searched WP:RSP and the noticeboard archives. There is no consensus to claim otherwise. Moreover...

com/name/nm6584218/bio Ajpoundz (talk) 21:07, 23 August 2020 (UTC) Per WP:RSPS, Famous Birthdays is blacklisted as spam. In addition, "There is consensus...

09:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)) Does WP:RSP help any? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:39, 22 November 2019 (UTC) On WP:RSP it is not indicated that "Forbes Media"...

shouldn't be messing with designations at RSP just because a source deserves it, apart from any usage in articles. WP:RSP should be a tool to help reduce conflict...

02:31, 15 February 2022 (UTC) Forbes contributors are not acceptable per WP:RSP but the remaining seem ok. Zeddedm (talk) 21:47, 25 February 2022 (UTC) Keep...

article, likely would contribute to GNG. thenational.scot no consensus on RSPS, article paywalled, might give significant coverage. Other reliable sources...

welcome! (t · c) buidhe 22:27, 21 May 2022 (UTC) Metro is considered unreliable, according to WP:RSP— PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 23:03, 8 June 2022 (UTC)...

sources used are not reliable (Forbes contributors, youtube, and imdb; see WP:RSP). We need an analysis of the reliable sources to establish that there is...

is not great and it appears to be extremely similar to the UK (RSP entry) and US (RSP entry) versions. I'm not claiming that the article subject is non-notable...

the sixth point since  Guinness World Records (RSP entry) is recognized as "marginally reliable" at WP:RSP, so it will not count on the film's awards. Chompy...

December 2019 (UTC) @Dream Focus: While I endorse the WP:NMODEL argument, WP:RSP states that Medium is a self-published source [and] should never be used...

some articles showed they toured internationally. If you want to remove the RSP failing sources, that would be fine. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:38, 15 July...

it to the article. However, Insider is of uncertain reliability as per WP:RSP. Your other two references are about a specific prank and don't say much...

PEIS, which is near capacity at the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources page. See full discussion at WT:RSP#Addressing hard template limits....

connect with fans". The Verge. Retrieved 16 September 2020. The Verge is RSP-greenlit, so unquestionably reliable, and it's a full-length reported piece...

opening the RfC below, as I believe it is due time to have it listed on WP:RSPS. ~ oklopfer (💬) 01:09, 28 April 2026 (UTC) There are two questions regarding...

RSN and RSP. But now I see that it's listed as Green (with caveat about bias) at RSP, based on a March 2021 RFC at RSN. So, yes, it is what RSP says it...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NCORP. Lack WP:SIGCOV, WP:RSP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Possible WP:UPE. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. - Hatchens...

JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:BIO, WP:ACTOR. Lacks credible citations as per WP:RSP. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. - Hatchens (talk) 15:05, 13 May 2022...

course I can't point you to where it says that on the WP:RSP entry; that's not what WP:RSP is for. But I can point you to discussions on what Screen...

Standard, Birmingham Mail, Metro are not RS and should not be used (see WP:RSP) WP:RSP states that "Context matters tremendously, and some sources may or may...

used as external links. Examples include Crunchbase (RSP entry), Discogs (RSP entry), and IMDb (RSP entry). Deprecation authorizes an edit filter, and there...

February 2006 (UTC) Keep - Merging with a separate product line makes no sense. RSP is not part of the Trainz Software line Sforget 15:22, 22 February 2006 (UTC)...

This essay concerns issues about the respell pages (RSP) which handle major misspelled words, to avoid misleading readers into thinking that the misspellings...

WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. And the Forbes contributor cite does not count - see WP:RSP. Edwardx (talk) 22:21, 29 September 2021 (UTC) Delete - I agree with user...

churnalism (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) and a couple of interviews (5, 6; also consult WP:RSP for reliability of Entrepreneur India). Notability is not inheritable from...

Daily Star, are unreliable tabloids per WP:RSPS. • Gene93k (talk) 21:05, 31 December 2021 (UTC) Also per WP:RSP, AVN is generally reliable. So that alone...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:BIO, WP:GNG. Lacks WP:SIGCOV, WP:RS/WP:RSP. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. - Hatchens (talk) 13:41, 2 April 2022...

NewBorders (talk) 20:00, 13 December 2024 (UTC) Roku, not listed at WP:RSP, also has 1997.  --Lambiam 15:32, 14 December 2024 (UTC) Thanks again for...

CNET (generally unreliable at RSP) and TechCrunch ("may be less useful for the purpose of determining notability" at RSP), but even setting aside the reliability...

also SIGCOV in Player-One, and an article in Heavy, which is listed in WP:RSP as marginally reliable. Remember, an article need not solely be about a topic...

source is Burke's Peerage, which is only reliable for genealogy (see WP:RSP). However, keeping this page only for genealogical reasons runs contrary...

WP:BLP1E. I'm going to spare other editors of deprecated/unreliable tabloids at RSP that aren't in the article already, but feel free to check Google News for...

The Sun about her EastEnders role (which specifically doesn't count per WP:RSP, bad news for UK soap opera fans), and one mention in the 'Leicester Mercury...

GeekWire is a routinely cited source. I was surprised to not find it on WP:RSP. If this is not closed procedurally, which I recommend given the behavior...

noticeboard for rating these would serve, or why that role is necessary. RSP assesses whether sources are *reliable*— Whether they can be assumed to report...

be on this list. Oaktree b (talk) 14:20, 21 December 2022 (UTC) As per WP:RSP: A source's absence from the list does not imply that it is any more or less...

Spring 2022, No. 5 Summer 2022, No. 6 These sources are already listed at WP:RSP and regularly provide news coverage on podcasting or podcasting related topics...

WP:NCORP. Current substantive ref is in TechCrunch, which is yellow-rated on WP:RSP as not really usable as indicative of notability. Other coverage is press...

Outside of Burke's Peerage, which is only reliable for genealogy per WP:RSP, the remaining sources don't provide secondary, independent, reliable, and/or...

WP:NPOL either. The two peerage websites in the article are deprecated per WP:RSP, and Google News only returns a passing mention for 1998, the year before...

evidence proffered was this IBTimes story - but IBTimes is listed on WP:RSP as generally unreliable, so not a source of notability. David Gerard (talk)...

consensus that CoinDesk should not be considered to establish notability (see WP:RSP), and BetaKit coverage seems to be insufficient to meet WP:NCORP. MarioGom...

Creates a Nutshell summarizing the source reliability status for an RSP landing page. {{Wikipedia:RSPNutshell|status|source|shortcut=shortcut}} There...

Creates a Nutshell summarizing the source reliability status for an RSP landing page. {{Wikipedia:RSPNutshell|status|source|shortcut=shortcut}} There...

to potentially pass as significant coverage: ibtimes (unreliable per WP:RSP) and The National Era. I don't know much about TNE (besides that the name...

passing mention); Who's Who UK was downgraded to generally unreliable at RSP last week, and the inclusion of peers is automatic; the Huddersfield Local...

Delete: It's close, but I could only find two sources that I would consider WP:RSP. I wouldn't consider this NYTimes article and this Business Insider article...

subject, nor fact checked. And although it's not a policy or guideline, WP:RSP labels both sites generally unreliable. Meticulo (talk) 23:39, 1 October...

whatsoever. The article was only sourced to LinkedIn (which I removed per WP:RSP) and a permanent dead link to the website, which is no longer active. A BEFORE...

ThatCerv (talk) 16:18, 6 May 2022 (UTC) ThatCerv, see The Canary's entry at WP:RSP for issues with that source. Also to the 2nd point, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS....

found were passing mentions and most of those were from sources listed at WP:RSP as situational or unreliable such as WP:BI and WP:FORBESCON. The show does...

(UTC) @Singularitywiki - see Reliable sources/Perennial sources (a.k.a. "WP:RSP" -- it's a useful list especially when working with marginally notable articles...

08:12, 17 October 2025 (UTC) Weak keep Draftify: Per a discussion at WP:RSPS, Allmusic shouldn't be used to establish notability. Taking away this and...

obviously routine, more are from Times of India, a situational ref on WP:RSP. Yes, he was a lead role for a web series with a WP article, but that article...

Wine Magazine, Business Insider (yellow on RSP), Fox (not a politics so reliable per RSP), Deseret (green on RSP for "local" news), and probably more. That...

ballotpedia link over which there is no consensus on reliability per WP:RSP and that link just mentions that there is funding for the group. The arizona...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:BIO, WP:GNG, WP:RS/WP:RSP. Lacks WP:SIGCOV. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. - Hatchens (talk)...

sources listed make no mention of the subject or are unreliable as per WP:RSP. A simple search brings up nothing reliable that helps establish WP:GNG....

lists and rankings (all-time/century/decade/year etc) Note: Please check WP:RSP or Albums sources if sources still meets for an inclusion. All of publications...

"Superstar". On "Masterpiece", HuffPost contributors must be removed per WP:RSP, "Gang Bang" has the same problem on the external link, so any information...

Cato Institute (RSP entry), Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (RSP entry), Hope not Hate (RSP entry), Media Matters for America (RSP entry), and Media...

only on a list of contestants. None of the other sources is listed at WP:RSP and none look reliable to me. Unless anyone knows better about these sources...

and more, for a variety of subjects. CNN (RSP entry), The Register (RSP entry), and The Daily Dot, (RSP entry) have also published articles on Web Sheriff's...

(UTC) Comment: The Hindu is a very reputable newspaper in India per its RSP entry, and it does look like the subject has significant coverage in one...

article and Yahoo News article, which are both on WP:RSP and suggest notability. Daily Dot is also on WP:RSP, though we are supposed to attribute it. That also...

I've previously read that it's reliable but I do see that it's yellow at WP:RSP. No mention that it does reviews in exchange for payment, which presumably...

aside from passing mentions or sources noted as generally unreliable at RSP. As far as I know, GNG fail. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 18:03, 11 July...

interviews, or questionably reliable sources, 1 (generally unreliable per WP:RSP), 2 (blog), 3, 4, 5. Most of the coverage on numbers of languages spoke might...

insufficient to establish notability: theeperage.com is unreliable per WP:RSP; the Daily Mail was deprecated; the Telegraph [1] and Wiltshire Live [2]...

(talk) 14:51, 21 April 2024 (UTC) The three sources are not reliable per WP:RSPS. Last.fm is deprecated same as Rate Your Music. Discogs is not reliable but...

source I found about him was this book. Find-A-Grave is unreliable per WP:RSP, and the book cited in the article is an autobiography, so it's not independent...

(PR articles) from the wheat (journalistic ones). We need to revamp the WP:RSP list. In its current state, many of us (new reviewers) are bound to get confused...

not usable for notability), and TechCrunch is a yellow-rated source at WP:RSP that is specifically not a source of notability. A WP:BEFORE on "Helium Systems"...

the company changed. There is coverage in the Daily Express, but per WP:RSP the Daily Express is not considered a reliable source. Whilst the company...

January 2021 (UTC) Wired, Quartz, WSJ, Vox, The BBC, The Verge. All on WP:RSP as generally reliable. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 04:17, 3 January 2021...

{{WP:RSPIntroWP:RSPIntro}} Creates a standard introductory sentence for an RSP landing page. {{Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Intro|Source...

October 2022 (UTC) Weak Keep. The South China Morning Post is RS per WP:RSP, The Straits Times is situational, but there is consensus that it is generally...

opinion on this wikipedia page. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:01, 1 May 2022 (UTC) Per RSP Find a Grave is not generally reliable because it is user generated. As far...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) non-notable "record" holder, as per WP:RSP there is no indication that a guinness record alone is enough to substantiate...

WP:GNG, quick google search came up with no sources that met WP:RS and WP:RSP LOMRJYO(About × contribs) 03:15, 8 March 2021 (UTC) Delete, as it is already...

more directory entries a linkedIn Page a Bloomberg directory entry (WP:RSP#Bloomberg_profiles), some sort of seller page, a YouTube channel, more directory...

secondary sources that, in their view, are sufficiently reliable. Although RSP is clearly an issue debated at length in this AfD, there was an almost 3...

Gene93k (talk) 21:13, 4 August 2022 (UTC) Keep. AVN, a green-level RS at RSP, covered him in this article where they wrote the subject had raised over...

passing a mention of subject. Fails WP:BIO, WP:GNG. Lacks WP:SIGCOV, WP:RS/WP:RSP. Brian O'Conner 21:41, 2 April 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

the Quackwatch article, I was just referred to WP:RSP by a comment on the AANC article talk page. WP:RSP says that articles on Quackwatch by Stephen Barrett...

itself is of potentially questionable notability (also not listed at WP:RSP), this is the first source with any depth whatsoever whiplash.net is an interesting...

need to rewrite our RSPS listing as it doesn't reflect actual RSN consensus accurately, in which case it should be taken up on the RSPS talk page not here...

which for politics is unreliable per WP:RSP (see WP:FOXNEWSPOLITICS) #3 is GB News which is unreliable per WP:RSP (see WP:GBNEWS) #5 is a piece written...

provided is a now-defunct Forbes contributor which is not reliable per WP:RSP. This all could be a single line in search engine optimization. ZimZalaBim...

refs 224 and 229 on the main article need to be removed or replaced per WP:RSP on International Business Times, HuffPost contributors, People's reliability...

sources, a list of frequently-discussed unreliable sources (shortcut WP:RSP) Wikipedia:WikiProject JavaScript, merged from WikiProject User scripts (shortcut...

2022 (UTC) Comment We can trust any secondary sources found on this page WP:RSP and WP:FORBESCON. D 🐕 B 🦇K🐞 (talk) 16:05, 5 November 2022 (UTC)-strike...

fashion-industry vertical of Vox Media, which is a reliable source per WP:RSP. I'm not sure what you mean by "press coverage is rather discouraged" but...

Dies, a Pay-for-Play Network Rises in Its Place" from The New York Times (RSP entry): 37 mentions of "Timpone" "Hundreds of 'pink slime' local news outlets...

JSTOR · TWL) End-to-end WP:PROMO. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR. Lacks WP:RS/WP:RSP. Possible WP:COI/WP:UPE. Creator of this page has also created a page Detective...

later removed the Fiji Sun reference in the article referring to WP:RSP. However, WP:RSP does not mention The Fiji Sun at all -- the only similar entry is...

(UTC) Keep - AVN, which is one of the review sources, is listed under WP:RSP as "Generally Reliable" for pornography. That should be good enough for notability...

12:42, 21 November 2021 (UTC) It looks like RIA Novosti is listed at WP:RSP as "No Consensus", and the comments state that "RIA Novosti was an official...

previous AfD, which keep !voters there and here refer to, are unreliable per WP:RSP; the argument that the rest are not substantive is persuasive. Vanamonde...

communicating that point. BD2412 T 21:41, 24 June 2022 (UTC) Keep Much like WP:RSP, it helps filter out potentially unreliable sources. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig...

businessperson that doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. According to WP:RSPS, we should not accept Forbes contributor pieces nor articles on Medium as...

sources (Inquisitr, GoodReads, and Medium, all of which are not RS per WP:RSP). What's left are a product listing (Google Books); the author's website...

plot description. Devonian Wombat (talk) 21:24, 25 December 2022 (UTC) WP:RSP lists Screenrant as OK for entertainment, questionable for BLP topics, so...

and San Francisco Bay Times. Also AVN, which is a green-level RS at WP:RSP. —Kbabej (talk) 15:19, 12 August 2022 (UTC) Keep per Kbabej. GoldenAgeFan1...

source falls under the Gawker umbrella, which, again, is not a RS per WP:RSP. That leaves the Destructoid source, which is actually a blog with no byline;...

(UK), which is considered even less reliable than the WP:DAILYMAIL per WP:RSPS. • Gene93k (talk) 21:14, 14 July 2020 (UTC) She is the most downloaded actress...

Fails WP:NFILM, Lack WP:SIGCOV. No significant sources as per WP:RS/WP:RSP. - Hatchens (talk) 08:30, 2 February 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

that this use of Vice as a source is reliable. From what I can see at WP:RSP, there is no consensus on Vice as a source, but for things outside of world...

which would not normally be considered independent or reliable as per WP:RSP. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 08:36, 4 November 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

possible, as per WP:PRIMARY and WP:SECONDARY. Try to find secondary sources. WP:RSP has a list of discussed sources and their reliability assessments. Try looking...

The Common Sense Media review is WP:SIGCOV, independent, and WP:RS per RSP, but other than trivial mentions, e.g., 1, I couldn't find other references...

Creates a Nutshell summarizing the source reliability status for an RSP landing page. {{Wikipedia:RSPNutshell|status|source|shortcut=shortcut}} There...

enough to pass WP:GNG. For Forbes contributor pieces specifically, see WP:RSP. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 16:48, 2 December 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...

Presumptively deprecated and listed at an addendum or sister-page of WP:RSP as such (with evidence). Added to an edit filter with "Prevent the user from...

sources/Perennial sources", Wikipedia, 2023-04-30, retrieved 2023-05-05 RSP. Past discussions of BBC: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 "Wikipedia:WikiProject...

Link: www.rspnetwork.in/2019/09/priyanka-agrawal-teams-up-with.html?m=1work=RSP%20Network (R/Xmeta/L- still there) 2020-11-05 05:53:22 (UTC): User Tinka...

RSP, it would require either a RfC or at least two significant discussions (see WP:RSPCRITERIA). There is at present one significant discussion, RSP shouldn't...

stuff and those were things in Indymedia.org and like which is red in WP:RSP. A good number of !votes in the first AfD years ago were rooted to editor...

News section, many of which I do not find reliable, including Metro (see WP:RSP#Metro), and the sources that otherwise are only mentions Hermitcraft in passing...

indication of passing WP:NAUTHOR or WP:GNG. 5/12 sources are Medium blogs (see WP:RSP#Medium; it's a blog host with no editorial oversight), the others are his...

either primary sources, obscure blogs, and one techcrunch piece, which WP:RSP recommends is less useful for determining notability. lettherebedarklight...

since I nominated it. It cites even more wikis now and WP:METRO is listed at RSP as generally unreliable. Crossroads -talk- 05:17, 25 August 2022 (UTC) I'm...

company, from Business Insider, only a marginally reliable source per WP:RSP. VickKiang (talk) 10:16, 28 November 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

Wikipedia:Citation Watchlist/Lists/RSP: Based on Perennial Sources Wikipedia:Citation Watchlist/Lists/Self-Publishing: Self-publishing platforms Wikipedia:Citation...

requirements. The HuffPost article is by a contributor, which states at WP:RSP should not be used for BLPs as it has "near-zero editorial oversight". --Kbabej...

ago, WP:RSP did not exist, much less WP:RSNOI that clearly affects notability here (based on the sources in this article). Actually, when WP:RSP came to...

page can be called notable Facebook link is not recognized on Wikipedia WP:RSP. 🦁 Lionfox 🏹 0909 (talk) 15:17, 1 November 2022 (UTC) strike sockpuppet...

there are no reviews, while IMDb is listed as "generally unreliable" at WP:RSP. Sjakkalle (Check!) 18:11, 24 October 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

News of the World (RSP entry) is deprecated, its parent company News UK is not deprecated, and its sibling publication The Times (RSP entry) is still classified...

Robertson's homophobic remarks unnecessary. Forbes is not entirely reliable per WP:RSP. Center-aligning the ref. column would be great. Other than that I am happy...

nothing better online. Forbes contributor articles do not count, see WP:RSP. Scion of a notable family, but see WP:NOTINHERITED. Run-of-the-mill businessman...

Panini! • 🥪 22:34, 13 March 2022 (UTC) Support Comments remove Forbes per WP:RSP, always cite Sify as publisher solely on any of the refs, change The Vancouver...

GuesanLoyalist, a few things: 1) The article is generally well-referenced, however WP:RSP warns against using Anadolu Agency as a reliable source for international...

can tell the author of the article is independent of the subject and WP:RSP lists VentureBeat as “Generally Reliable” (although the discussion appears...

(talk) 14:47, 29 July 2021 (UTC) I lean toward a keep. The Guardian is an RSP-greenlit source with an editorial firewall, which I highly doubt would be...

Is it? Romblelimer (talk) 16:31, 20 March 2021 (UTC) It isn't in the WP:RSPS list but "this source". says it is peer-reviewed and the journal has clearly...

independent of the subject). But even then, Medium is not a reliable source per WP:RSP. This leaves the Polygon article, which is reliable, but only has a brief...

directly related to Made in Chelsea, or in unreliable tabloids such as The Sun (RSP entry). signed, Rosguill talk 19:32, 3 October 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

(UTC) Keep Kitchen Carnage. Four reviews that are RS per WP:VG/RS and WP:RSP easily meets WP:GNG or WP:NPRODUCT. Redirect Annoying Orange: Splatter Up...

(UTC) Delete: 7 of the 10 sources are marked as "unreliable" according to WP:RSP. The whole section on the subjects "personal life" is unreferenced, going...

reliabilities are currently listed as "no consensus" at WP:RSP. I don't have a particularly high opinion of WP:RSP unless there has been an RfC, but do you think...

just repackaging a report from the unreliable tabloid Global Times (see WP:RSP). The few remaining sources are not enough to establish notability. And I...

and press in less-than-reliable cryptocurrency publications like Coindesk (RSP entry) (here's some from CoinTelegraph, a publication I'm not familiar with...

@Tsistunagiska: Buzzfeed News and Deadline Hollywood are both listed as reliable on WP:RSP. Seventeen is a long running magazine that appears reliable although there...

this outlet listed at WP:RSP - I would oppose that. RSP is not supposed to be a general list of “good” or “bad” sources. RSP is for listing sources that...

(talk) 03:08, 12 May 2022 (UTC) We can't ignore RSP because the RfC was explicitly framed to place SI in an RSP category (WP:GREL, WP:MREL etc.). It doesn't...

Username? There are reviews in Variety here (a green-level source at WP:RSP; see WP:VARIETY); Fangoria here; DVD Talk here (as listed by Donaldd23 above);...

WP:UGC and WP:SPS, 2 is a blog, 3 and 4 are help supports, 5 is listed at WP:RSP which has no consensus of reliability, due to the Articles written by contributors...

by WP:RSP, or listed on WP:DEPS (deprecated) ✋ Caution - Middle level of concern, "sometimes unreliable" but officially "no consensus" WP:RSP 🔎 Inspect...

find any listing of the Tehran Times as an unreliable source, as per WP:RSP --Whiteguru (talk) 11:36, 25 September 2020 (UTC) Keep. Appears to be significant...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Lacks WP:RS/WP:RSP, WP:SIGCOV. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. - Hatchens (talk) 18:45...

domestic incidents have been covered by PinkNews, a green-level RS on WP:RSP (here). Queerty covered a marketing stunt where he offered Justin Bieber...

Uyghur genocide); the story was filed under its news section. Currently, WP:RSP describes Insider — with the exception of its culture section, which is considered...

party-owned, which precludes the sources as WP:RS in principle per WP:DEPS & WP:RSP. As per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, the sources do not establish WP:ORGSIG. In summary...

12:49, 9 September 2021 (UTC) 1. TechCrunch is specifically listed at WP:RSP as "TechCrunch may be useful for satisfying verifiability, but may be less...

KeenGamer is unreliable per WP:VGRS, and Medium is red-carded unreliable on WP:RSP as a blog-hosting service. So those two references are out. Moving on to...

misrepresentation of the source. That leaves Investopedia. It is "yellow" per WP:RSP, but in context it is about "markets", not "finance". As JBchrch mentions...

also has a KO/RS entry. I think the Yahoo Japanese source falls under WP:RSP's Yahoo! News entry. And there's also this from Bandwagon. Itzy Japan is primary...

(UTC) Keep The article cites numerous perennial, reliable sources per WP:RSP, such as Reuters, ZDNet, Bloomberg and Forbes. Sources such as these are...

fails GNG. It's sole citation (from AllMusic, labelled no-consensus at WP:RSP) showed up 9 years ago — nothing since. A BEFORE search brought up a lot...

Newsweek is, indeed, citing her work, but Newsweek is junk; yellow at WP:RSP. The Atlantic isn't citing her work, it's reporting on a panel, on which...

under "Brand Post") International Business Times (unreliable), refer to WP:RSP Mid-day (has a disclaimer at the bottom and tagged under "partnered content")...

plenty of others). He's apparently won a Guinness World Record now, but WP:RSP states: "There is consensus that world records verified by Guinness World...

sources. One of which is unreliable as it is just a StrategyWiki per WP:RSP. The other source is a PNG to a website which no longer displays that image...

https://www.allmusic.com (note that WP:RSP considers it only borderline reliable) The discussions I see at WP:RSP attributed to that site's company are...

analogy, TASS is like Xinhua News Agency (RSP entry), while RT is like China Global Television Network (RSP entry). (In fact, CGTN was modeled after RT...

regarded as unreliable. Historyexpert2 (talk) 16:22, 28 March 2026 (UTC) The WP:RSP entries for both Daily Dot and Boing Boing have been exactly the same since...

Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard discussion. SiliconAngle is not on WP:RSP. ~Kvng (talk) 23:34, 9 November 2020 (UTC) A relevant deletion discussion...

2021 (UTC) Keep, AVN which is used extensively on the page is agreed on WP:RSP to be generally reliable source, as is The Sydney Morning Herald. CNBC is...

Tony Fox (arf!) 01:02, 14 April 2022 (UTC) Yes, WP:FORBESCON is the WP:RSP entry specifically distinguishing Forbes RS content (staff bylines, from...

want to note that Daily Express is considered generally unreliable by WP:RSP, and given it's the only source that details his career, it shouldn't be...

neither are stellar on the reliability front (they're both no consensus at RSP), these particular articles appear to be reported profiles, not churnalism...

trash like this makes me lose a lot of confidence in it, and I think our RSP entry is too generous. The problem with the article (and the "recession"...

reliable for sports coverage (EssentiallySports, MiddleEasy, Sportskeeda per WP:RSP), the independent reliable source coverage amounts to a 2015 MMA Mania suspension...

in your comment, Breitbart News (RSP entry), RT (Russia Today) (RSP entry), and China Global Television Network (RSP entry) have been deprecated because...

Navyrecognition is noted as an unreliable source, but the discussion at WP:RSP doesn't give much information why. Is this a reliable source for the article...

(talk) 18:39, 4 December 2021 (UTC) Even TechCrunch is yellow-rated at WP:RSP for its incessant boosterism, and isn't so usable for notability - David...

one paragraph routine coverage from a situationally reliable source per WP:RSP, not meeting the requirement of being a reliable, independent, significant...

{{u|Sdkb}} talk 17:18, 12 August 2021 (UTC) We absolutely do list The Australian at RSP. RSP isn't supposed to be an exhaustive list of every countrys major newspapers...

the appropriate guidelines. I have used clear news reports, following the RSP qualification criteria for The Hindu. No source is perfect; their coverage...

find the growth of RSP in 2020 to be alarming. YouTube shouldn't even be listed at RSP. It's like listing "television" or "paper" at RSP. It's a medium not...

a couple unreliable sources (history.com is considered unreliable at WP:RSP, and IMDB is user-generated), and there's some uncited text, mainly in the...

significant award or honor. WP:SPORTSPERSON also doesn't meet cuz no any WP:RSP in article. Son-in-law of Jackie Shroff doesn't meet notability guideline...

is yellow on WP:RSP and was not claiming otherwise. Now that those issues are out of the way, what is your opinion on the (green at RSP) U.S. News source...

unrelaible: for details, see WP:ORGCRIT and check the entry of Forbes.com at WP:RSP#Sources. - NitinMlk (talk) 20:45, 17 August 2019 (UTC) @NitinMlk: and @Meeanaya:...

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:21, 12 October 2020 (UTC) Delete, definitely PR. The RSP entry on The Times of India needs an update anyways, it's fairly well documented...

the Russian Government's TASS (RSP entry), and the Turkish Government's Anadolu Agency (RSP entry) and TRT World (RSP entry), Xinhua is usable for statements...

WP:NBIO, included sources are noted as no consensus - questionable on WP:RSP ASUKITE 17:09, 27 July 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

company. Trustpilot is user-generated and listed as generally unreliable at WP:RSP, and a star rating does not establish notability anyway. The Business Insider...

World, a defunct British newspaper regarded as a deprecated source, see WP:RSP. PatGallacher (talk) 18:21, 28 July 2020 (UTC) Delete per nom and the other...

Times RSP, The Nation RSP, Al Jazeera English RSP, and The Daily BeastRSP, winning various awards; Ben Norton who has written for The Intercept RSP including...

(talk) 17:56, 5 November 2021 (UTC) Keep. Relevant is not blacklisted in WP:RSP and should be allowed as a source until the community comes to a consensus...

{{WP:RSPIntroWP:RSPIntro}} Creates a standard introductory sentence for an RSP landing page. {{Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Intro|Source...

2010 (UTC) Comment seems a hoax. Matthew_hk tc 09:18, 30 January 2010 (UTC) Rsp. player does exist, simply fails notability. [1] shows he plays in U-19 team...

History6042 (talk) 00:55, 1 January 2024 (UTC) Royal Central is unreliable per WP:RSP, citations to it on the article should be replaced with more reliable sources...

jank the content if it doesn't warrant inclusion in the first place. The WP:RSP list, User:SuperHamster/CiteUnseen and User:Headbomb/unreliable are some...

substantive sources. The main source, Marquis Who's Who, is established by WP:RSP as an unreliable source based on the subject's own contributions. Then cites...

July 2020 (UTC) Keep. I just added additional news coverage from France (an RSP-greenlit source), Vietnam, and Germany (×2), and that's in addition to the...

company. Trustpilot is user-generated and listed as generally unreliable at WP:RSP, and a star rating does not establish notability anyway. The Business Insider...

September 2020 (UTC) Delete DailyStar is considered an unreliable source at WP:RSP so it can't be used to establish WP:N, and the Bob Ross source doesn't mention...

2 are not listed on WP:RSP. Dingers5Days (talk) 16:19, 28 October 2024 (UTC) Just because the other two are not listed at RSP doesn't mean they are unreliable...

requirements for GA is reliability, for FA it is instead "high-quality RS". per WP:RSP, there is no consensus on the reliability of Business Insider, so it does...

third(more than half) of the sources used in the article are unreliable per RSP and the other sources used are fake referencing. Celestina007 (talk) 22:39...

requirements. As a third, what about the Time article? Time is listed on WP:RSP as a good source. Thoughts? --Kbabej (talk) 18:50, 28 March 2022 (UTC) @Kbabej:...

Clinton BaptisteIt would probably be best if you read WP:RS and visited wP:RSP, specifically WP:DAILYMAIL and WP:NYPOST. PRAXIDICAE💕 15:39, 26 May 2022...

entry (ProPublica), the Washington Examiner (of dubious reliability per WP:RSP), an apparent blog with no visible editorial names or policy (so not a WP:NEWSORG)...

sources for notability) Piecesofuk (talk) 15:49, 11 February 2022 (UTC) Per WP:RSP: There is no consensus on the reliability of Who's Who UK. It is a reference...

don't exactly and specifically know the reliability of its "studies", but WP:RSP states: Al Jazeera is considered a generally reliable news organization....

are a pair from The Daily Dot.[1][2] That's scant on it's own, but per WP:RSP and previous RSN discussions, The Daily Dot is also probably a bad indicator...

of thing. Aside from being unreliable as a user-generated source (see WP:RSP), three of the cemeteries in the list are some distance from the crossroads...

Mail (RSP entry) and The Sun (RSP entry) are deprecated, editors consider BBC (RSP entry), The Guardian (RSP entry), and The Daily Telegraph (RSP entry)...

and similar fallacies in future discussions. See also WP:RS, WP:RSN and WP:RSPS if you want to assess existing sources. ZeroJaguar (talk) 16:57, 31 May 2026...

sourcing that mentions Dunn is quite poor—a video by the deprecated source WP:RSP#RT, a brief mention in a video by Reason TV, and some mentions in an NPR...

BuzzFeed News, PinkNews, People, CNN, WFAA, Men's Health. I often refer to WP:RSP to check if a source is likely to be reliable. TJMSmith (talk) 22:46, 28...

largely unacceptable such as discogs which can not be used as sources per WP:RSP. Graywalls (talk) 23:08, 24 April 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

--DaJerm (talk) 00:08, 24 April 2020 (UTC) @DaJerm: I generally use WP:RSP for consensus on reliability of sources, and there The Heavy is not considered...

CEO indicates notability, imo. These are all reliable sources on the WP:RSP list. Passes WP:GNG. Passes WP:3REFS. I wouldn't have taken the time to write...

on WP:RSP, the list that I generally defer to. Citrivescence (talk) 04:03, 4 January 2020 (UTC) The absence of AllMusic in the list at WP:RSP is not...

which would not normally be considered independent or reliable as per WP:RSP. Fails WP:AUTHOR, WP:NACTOR and general notability guideline. GSS (talk|c|em)...

generally unreliable source BellaNaija (per WP:NGRS) and WP:IMDB (per WP:RSP), which should be removed. Several sources appear to be recycled press releases...

on sales numbers which is backed by discogs, which is unreliable per WP:RSP. ASUKITE 14:54, 17 May 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

known widely cited news agency. They are explicitly stated as a RS in WP:RSP. This other source is not a news agency. They position themselves as a business...

aims at 'the mainstream economy not the black market'" from The Register (RSP entry) "Gnu Taler soll Kryptowährungen gerechter machen" from Golem.de [de]...

is from VentureBeat, which is deemed a generally reliable source via WP:RSP. In addition to information from the company itself, this article also references...

by MOS:LEAD. Also, History Channel is rated as an unreliable source at WP:RSP. There are also some sources flagged as unreliable or needing full citation...

so much as a stub, and the Wall Street Journal is a decent source per WP:RSP, but what little I am able to read of it (paywalled) suggests that the company...

"contributor" byline, which is the case here) is listed as non-RS at WP:RSPS. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:18, 12 May 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

and similar fallacies in future discussions. See also WP:RS, WP:RSN and WP:RSPS if you want to assess existing sources. ZeroJaguar (talk) 16:57, 31 May 2026...

little bit more coverage on the organization, but it's posted by the WP:RSP-unreliable Times of India: [1] AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:50, 9 November...

There are 10 refs, of which 8 are newspapers that are definitely RS per RSP. Unfortunately, most are behind a paywall, but I am confident that this easily...

a professional journalist? I was hoping WeChat would have an entry at WP:RSPS but it does not. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:37, 26 April 2023 (UTC) It...

establishing notability. . DGG ( talk ) 05:30, 23 September 2021 (UTC) @DGG: WP:RSP does say that it may not be useful for verifying notability, which indicates...

like Daily Mail, NY Post and Washington Examiner, are not reliable per WP:RSP. Rab V (talk) 19:43, 5 August 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

Coindesk is a generally unreliable source, and is flagged as such at WP:RSP. It is not usable as evidence of notability, and doesn't belong in the article...

Gilbert based on highly questionable sources Daily Mail (RSP entry) and WorldNetDaily (RSP entry) in violation of the verifiability and neutral point...

unreliable. Only one pertinent source (Huffington Post) appears to meet WP:RSP. His role in the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago...

opinions of such interviewees to be added in articles, based on the WP:RSP's saying "Fox News talk shows, including …, should not be used for statements...

meeting the wp:3REFS minimum in wp:RS one of which, is listed green at WP:RSP (Bloomberg News). In regards to The Straits Times, it's WP entry says, "daily...

Keep: Non-trivial coverage in Variety, Rest of World, and TechCrunch (meets RSP as being staff-written). Along with the sources in the article I think there's...

or magazines, with Kirkus and Entertainment Weekly being listed RS on WP:RSP, Publishers Weekly is also a reliable magazine IMO with about us and submission...

which strongly suggests notability. Meets WP:GNG by People article (per WP:RSP, "There is consensus that People magazine can be a reliable source in biographies...

many problems with RSP itself that I cannot comment on how the source should be ranked at RSP. So, I think we need to discuss RSP itself. And my thoughts...

WP:SIGCOV/WP:CORPDEPTH (coverage in an academic book), and WP:THREE(as per WP:RSP). If anyone feels otherwise, then feel free to add to this discussion. Whatever...

(UTC) Support Comment the usage of PR Newswire has got to be fixed per WP:RSP; however, I felt very proud to have reviewed a few of these detailed articles...

example, seems to be WP:SIGCOV on The Indian Express, listed as reliable on WP:RSP). — VORTEX3427 (Talk!) 08:46, 17 November 2022 (UTC) How he seems to meet...

2021 (UTC) I linked the policy above, but to provide it again: WP:RS. WP:RSP also provides a quick list of commonly-used sources and whether we generally...

also worth mentioning the reliability of the sources. WP:METRO is listed at RSP as generally unreliable. The one 25YL source doesn't appear to have an author...

05:39, 9 March 2022 (UTC) I took a look at most of the sources listed by WP:RSP as reliable, and a lot of them seem to have articles about George. 1 2 3...

does not have sufficient coverage WP:SIGCOV in the reliable sources WP:RSP. Current page is WP:PROMO. Charlie (talk) 15:44, 6 December 2024 (UTC) Note:...

reliable for sports coverage (EssentiallySports, MiddleEasy, Sportskeeda per WP:RSP), the independent reliable source coverage amounts to a 2015 MMA Mania suspension...

worst one. ArionStar (talk) 02:51, 15 April 2025 (UTC) Not compliant with WP:RSP. -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:26, 17 April 2025 (UTC) Support The article is...

notability. (TOI is known for paod new/reviews/puffery, and according to WP:RSP, it is "generally unreliable".) Pinkvilla is a gossip site, something similar...

related to the GEOnet Names Server, which is deprecated for notability at WP:RSP. I'd suggest mass deletion of all the unsourced one-sentence stubs on Central...

significant coverage but its reliability is questionable outside of Hong Kong per RSPS and this article by Tencent would likely be reliable (again, under WP:XINHUA)...

the three remaining sources one is from Blogspot which unreliable per WP:RSP. The remaining two sources are both in Spanish but which are allowed on Wikipedia...

{{WP:RSPIntroWP:RSPIntro}} Creates a standard introductory sentence for an RSP landing page. {{Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Intro|Source...

https://consequenceofsound.net/ https://www.allmusic.com/ note that per WP:RSP this is considered at best a marginal source. https://ultimateclassicrock...

13:58, 11 January 2022 (UTC) Keep TorrentFreak is a reliable source per WP:RSP. I don't see what has changed since the previous AfD which also resulted...

its also not entirely about the Kushners deal. Regarding NY Post/Page 6 WP:RSP says: "There is consensus that the New York Post is generally unreliable...

The correct citations are: 1. Times of India - Generally reliable per WP:RSP: Chakrapani, Saranya (27 October 2022). "Trichy: Record setting Silambam...

com/kanye-west-brings-out-kid-cudi-in-sacramento/ https://www.allmusic.com/ note that WP:RSP considers this only of only marginal reliablity thus making it unlikely to...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NCORP and needs more WP:SIGCOV in WP:RSP. At the present moment, the coverage provided is considered trivial. Notedolly2...

(talk) 11:19, 7 November 2021 (UTC) Keep The sources mentioned aren't in WP:RSP, and unless someone can prove to me that they're not reliable on this topic...

Alternet (RSP entry) [11][12][13], Daily Kos (RSP entry) [14], Raw Story (RSP entry) [15], The Canary (RSP entry) [16], and the Electronic Intifada (RSP entry)...

of interest - means everything in the discussion opinions summarised at RSP still holds. There is no other source we'd put up with acting this way with...

2020 (UTC) comment IBT is unreliable. Business Insider is questionable. WP:RSP. Graywalls (talk) 00:39, 19 September 2020 (UTC) forgot to notify @Bri: Graywalls...

coverage to be WP: ROUTINE. HuffPost contributers, basically a blog. See WP:RSP listing. press release copied reference, same as No. 9 WP:TRIVIAL mention...

sourced almost exclusively by sources not noted as reliable by Wikipedia:RSP. The outsized content suggests this is a fanpage. 128.252.210.2 (talk) 16:07...

this is a legit "staff" writer for Forbes, not a "contributor"; see WP:RSP). – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:41, 30 August 2018 (UTC) I agree with...

the ones under discussion generally are (Wired is on RSP unconditionally, and Mashable is on RSP with the caveat "especially ensuring that the content...

@Doomsdayer520, I have a script that shows unreliable sources according to RSP & it expressly tagged that source as blatant unreliable, I was dazed yesterday...

noted, and thanks for the clarifications. FWIW, though, according to WP:RSP Politico is "is considered generally reliable for American politics"; it...

not for WP:BLPs - Coindesk is categorised as "generally unreliable" on WP:RSP, and all other crypto sites are worse. In particular, you cannot use crypto...

referring to WP:RSP, no it should not be added unless there have been at least a couple of major discussions contesting its reliability. RSP is not intended...

received widespread sigcov, in multiple sources that meet WP:RSMUSIC and WP:RSPS. As well as the Rolling Stone, Variety & BBC refs you added, there's also...

has been discussed in great details on Wikipedia, see their listings at WP:RSP. For such sources, it is very easy to find other third-party sources confirming...

there were additional AP wire stories about his appointment to Ricks. Per WP:RSP, Deseret News is considered to be generally reliable for local news and I...

should be a SPS and generally unreliable, similar to a WordPress blog per WP:RSP, unless there is convincing evidence otherwise. Additionally, on Outnow.ch...

200510-xuozadhelbbktln22hwsauxuhi-story.html (WP:RSP seems to consider it marginal) I checked WP:RSP, and it looks like the concern is over the headlines...

AVN, which is a green-level source for pornography-related articles at WP:RSP. Easy GNG pass with multiple green-level RS. —Kbabej (talk) 18:03, 9 August...

grant organization. Nicholas D. (talk) 21:24, 26 June 2022 (UTC) Read WP:RSP and WP:OSE while you're at it. Your arguments don't hold up. PRAXIDICAE🌈...

rewrite) from http://www.icssr.org/fello_main.htm, http://www.icssr.org/rsp_intro.htm, and probably more. The whole article needs to be checked. Copyvio...

BLP and another BLP? Citing Gawker, which is generally unreliable at WP:RSP for claims about BLPs? None of that was fit for an article, especially a...

noticeboard to develop official sources ratings lists something like WP:RSP? This would need enough volunteers willing to rate specific government agencies...

(UTC) Support Comment the usage of PR Newswire has got to be fixed per WP:RSP; however, I felt very proud to have reviewed a few of these detailed articles...

Encyclopedia.com is considered a reliable source (there has been discussion on RSP talk); the Tsetsi citation is an interview on a blog; the KRQE citation looks...

coverage I can find of this subject is from patently unreliable (see: WP:RSP) tabloids, namely The Sun (deprecated), Metro (generally unreliable), Daily...

from Rediker himself and are non-controversial, which is consistent with WP:RSP. Thanks, Pac-Man PHD (talk) 21:11, 17 November 2023 (UTC) After a quick skim...

non-primary sources are undesirable: Screen Rant is marginally reliable per WP:RSP, CBR is also not generally reliable per Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive...

independent). Vice piece is also WP:SIGCOV but only marginally reliable per WP:RSP. In contrast, the rest does appear to be routine announcements, e.g., this...

(talk) 19:35, 29 March 2026 (UTC) Keep A review by Times Now, according to WP:RSP, it is marginally reliable for politics and reliable for other topics. A...

sources are flagged as problematic at WP:RSP. since except ZDNet, none of the sources are in RSP (and besides RSP is not the holy grail). Only source I said...

a WP:BEFORE search (this discounts coverage in unreliable sources per WP:RSP such as the Daily Sabah). Damaged cemeteries have been mentioned, but these...

magazine, not the contributor network, which is a reliable source per WP:RSP -- (https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexkonrad/2018/05/15/namely-fires-ceo/...

(UTC) @Alangar Manickam you need to familiarize yourself with WP:RS and WP:RSP because none of those and I really do mean none - are relaible, much less...

the article. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 02:46, 26 January 2021 (UTC) Per WP:RSP Vogue is considered reliable, though I'm unsure if this extends to Teen Vogue...

article fail WP:V with some of them being considered generally unreliable (WP:RSP). Articles available online are mostly user generated content that do not...

November 2021 (UTC) Sources: Post-2013 Newsweek is listed as iffy at WP:RSP, is this good enough for FA standards? I swapped it out for Fiske. The Pomona...

substantial recognition or documentation in widely accepted publications i.e., WP:RSP, the college does not achieve the visibility or impact needed to fulfill...

and similar fallacies in future discussions. See also WP:RS, WP:RSN and WP:RSPS if you want to assess existing sources. ZeroJaguar (talk) 16:57, 31 May 2026...

just from a Bittrex blog post (and IBTimes is "generally unreliable" per WP:RSP, so not a source of notability) These sources exist because they're about...

Freud.Slatersteven (talk) 10:52, 12 December 2019 (UTC) Note the existing RSP entry for Encyclopædia Britannica (Encyclopædia Britannica Online), linking...

| watch | logs)​ It fails WP:GNG (even WP:SNG), WP:SIGCOV, and WP:RS/WP:RSP. Multiple attempts are made to push this entity into main article namespace...

between them. This treads into primary-source territory. Finally, see WP:RSP: The Straits Times is not considered a reliable source when the Signaporean...

including the Cato Institute (RSP entry), Media Matters for America (RSP entry), and the Media Research Center (RSP entry). As the publication is biased...

discussion is notable? Celestina007 (talk) 12:09, 20 April 2020 (UTC) Per WP:RSP The Daily Dot is considered a reliable source for matters of Internet culture...

check WP:RSP. El komodos drago (talk to me) 12:50, 23 November 2020 (UTC) In past discussions, editors considered Media Bias/Fact Check (RSP entry) generally...

also a marginally reliable source for non-culture related content per WP:RSP, this appears to be a media piece, not a culture one. Thus, one source does...

MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:44, 19 March 2022 (UTC) MarioSoulTruthFan WP:RSP lists the source as reliable for topics like file sharing. --K. Peake 15:32...

Vaticidalprophet 03:19, 5 April 2021 (UTC) Because it is listed as no-consensus at WP:RSP, there would need to be a rationale as to how it would meet the higher bar...

Budhathoki's two articles in The Diplomat. While The Diplomat paper is itself a WP:RSP green source, the article author Arun Budhathoki, as researched by Praxidicae...

still advocate deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:49, 5 November 2016 (UTC) Rsp Fine to feel so, but when presented with sources to meet WP:GNG, it is usually...

2020 (UTC) Delete per nom. Most of the sources used are not reliable per WP:RSP. A WP:BEFORE search found nothing of note. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 21:25...

a “large team”? That term is subjective and thus not neutral. As per WP:RSP He was the correspondent for a NATIONAL TV show called "Good Day Live" not...

implications that WW cannot be used as a source, as that is not what WP:RSP says at all: The source may still be used for uncontroversial self-descriptions...

December 2020 (UTC) My interpretation of that RSP entry combined with some of the other entries on RSP and what I know about the Daily Dot is not so much...

last one).Slatersteven (talk) 15:07, 11 January 2019 (UTC) Re-target to RSPS seems fine. Target to either of the RfCs also seems fine, so long as they...

Panini! • 🥪 22:34, 13 March 2022 (UTC) Support Comments remove Forbes per WP:RSP, always cite Sify as publisher solely on any of the refs, change The Vancouver...

(talk) 04:56, 7 March 2022 (UTC) Newsweek's not a reliable source per WP:RSP. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:29, 7 March 2022 (UTC) Delete I don't think...

reliability of Ealing.News can be debated, but there is no consensus available (WP:RSPS). As an WP:EVENT, there should be WP:SIGCOV from multiple reliable and independent...

Television Network (RSP entry), Global Times (RSP entry), HispanTV (RSP entry), RT (Russia Today) (RSP entry), and Sputnik (RSP entry), tend to be deprecated...

interesting but I'm not sure that it qualifies for reliable/notable. WP:RSP is noncommittal on the site but more importantly, the piece is a primary...

Mashable, which is “yellow” on WP:RSP. The Mashable article itself largely cites KnowYourMeme, which is “red” on RSP. Mikewem (talk) 17:52, 21 November...

impossible: Googling reveals a TechCrunch article (from a staff writer, per WP:RSP) about the Nvidia acquisition. jp×g 06:26, 10 December 2020 (UTC) Keep Good...

anything too obviously wrong with the referencing. (Except to say that, per WP:RSP, Newsweek is no longer considered categorically reliable, although to me...

Washington Post- I was not expecting coverage from sources listed WP:RS on WP:RSP, just references that could count towards WP:GNG. Thanks. VickKiang (talk)...

for publishing accurate accounts of Wikipedia, a rare thing even in the RSP-green press. — Bilorv (talk) 18:45, 1 October 2022 (UTC) Want the latest...

sources Hollywood Reporter and Deadline Hollywood are greenlisted in WP:RSP so this does actually pass WP:GNG as these are in-depth coverage of the film...

Venezuelanalysis (generally unreliable per WP:RSP), was the director of Telesur English (unreliable per WP:RSP) from 2014 to 2015 and is currently an editor...

(excluding quotes from subject) in The New York Post ("no consensus" on RSP), over 1000 words with significant biographical content in Straus News, 107...

WP:RSP now. Thanks!AdrianWikiEditor (talk) 23:38, 9 March 2019 (UTC) We should not start discussions for the sole purpose of adding sources to RSPS. GMGtalk...

found include [2] (no sigcov), [3] (also no sigcov), [4] (deprecated at RSP), and [5] (also not sigcov). All of these are based solely on the grant announcement...

Huffington Post contributor on Washington University station is unreliable per WP:RSP. The source Cheasty Greenspace on Columbia city station appears to be a blog-style...

them". Bearcat (talk) 17:14, 2 May 2021 (UTC) BuzzFeed News is reliable per RSP and can be used to establish notability. SK2242 (talk) 17:46, 2 May 2021...

Wrld, so WP:NOTINHERITED. The newer sources are all low-quality and not WP:RSP: The Sun, TMZ, HotNewHipHop, XXL Mag, vladtv.com - these are all trivial...

review (Times of India), which has a "no consenus" for reliabliblity on WP:RSP DonaldD23 talk to me 19:52, 19 July 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

non-reliable sources, even after which the subject is covered in independent WP:RSP such as GQ and Hype Magazine, and a few other. Easily passes WP:GNG. Retro...

references to independent reliable sources (it still doesn't, please check WP:RSP for the details). Now it is also extremely promotional (which is a separate...

claims backed by an unreliable source, the onus is on them to fix it. WP:RSPS only exists because of the number of editors that fall for otherwise unreliable...

satisfies WP:GNG. (Reason and Playboy are green-rated RS, see WP:RSP#Reason and WP:RSP#Playboy. As for the BI article, I am not quite sure if it falls...

significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. (?) HuffPo (RSP entry) contributors are unreliable. Booklist and PW are trade publications...

should be removed from references in this article and Jim Lovell per WP:RSP. You have accidentally added an extra t to Elliot See's name in the navbox...

covered in the Daily Mail, but that's a deprecated/unreliable source per WP:RSP.) Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:54, 20 February 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

International Business Times article ([3]), all of which are blacklisted per WP:RSP (in ways they weren't back in 2015). A Ukranian-language DW article ([4])...

candidates outside the article (e.g., Crunchbase News) are deprecated per WP:RSP. Rather than outright deletion I'd ask the closer to draftify so the article...

(UTC) The Rambling Man and Dweller, there is nothing on these sources at WP:RSP so that is why I admitted to not having too much knowledge of them. After...

including one from Vice. The reliability of VICE is questionable per WP:RSP, however, I believe that would not apply to entertainment and music articles...

posted are an opinion article published by an unreliable source (see WP:RSP#The New American) and the author page for the three editorials by Marc Tucker...

MAG.Bikerose (talk) 20:05, 24 January 2024 (UTC) CNET: Situational (per WP:RSP) PCMAG: Reliable (per WP:VG/S) New Atlas: (Presumed) reliable (per RSN archive...

no reliable sources. – Here's an article from Arab News. According to WP:RSP, there is consensus that Arab News is a usable source for topics unrelated...

05:36, 18 January 2021 (UTC) You're likely thinking of WP:DEPRECATED or WP:RSP. But if it's only referred to by one page it's not likely we'd be able to...

mostly right-wing sources (out of the 5 deprecated/banned sources on WP:RSP, only Occupy Democrats is listed on adfontesmedia.com as left-wing). The...

whether the writer is a columnist or has a conflict of interest, Wikipedia: RSP. This story is an extensive analysis of the company, reported story, written...

doesn't disqualify something. See, for example, the Mother Jones entry at WP:RSP. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 13:37, 26 October 2019 (UTC) Rhododendrites, eeehhh...

WP:BLP with 26 (!) WP:RS in the references, including several strong WP:RSP, and it could easily have more. Long version: The article's subject -- not...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) All sources used are unreliable according to WP:RSP. These sources include MusicBrainz, Album of the Year, Rate Your Music, Last...

consistency, WordPress should not be used in the awards and nominations one per WP:RSP and the lead of songs recorded should be cut down to four paras to comply...

reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. It is on Rotten Tomatoes but per WP:RSP Reviewers tracked by Rotten Tomatoes are not automatically reliable for their...

bottom-of-the-barrel listicles from ScreenRant, which is marginally reliable per WP:RSP, the coverage appear to be routine and trivial, in merely a few short paragraphs...

listed as unreliable in WP:VG/S and Daily Express is also unreliable per WP:RSP. I'll check the other sources later. Spinixster (chat!) 00:57, 26 October...

generally and only briefly mentions Antimetal, and a TechCrunch article (RSP entry) that reads like a lightly edited press release. Searching online,...

keep: Notability can be established by the following reliable sources per WP:RSP: Bhagat, Hitesh Raj. "Slowly review: The app lets you revive the pen-friend...

particular source would meet the criteria, try looking at WP:RSN archives, WP:RSP, or ask here or at the teahouse. Victor Schmidt (talk) 06:37, 18 October...

passing mention. Only source 12, [2], with significant coverage. Per WP:RSP: International Business Times is generally considered unreliable. The article...

a passing mention, and while The Daily Dot is generally reliable per WP:RSP, an interview with the founder of a blog about the blog is still pretty clearly...

guidelines for corporations, as explained in WP:NCORP, WP:ORGCRIT. Fails WP:RSP. Sponsored content published at supplements (WP:NEWSORGINDIA). Renomination...

of wide coverage: The New York Times (RSP entry), Fox News (RSP entry), Vanity Fair (RSP entry), The Hill (RSP entry). MarioGom (talk) 11:40, 20 April...

sources/Perennial sources incorrectly. Nobody is going to add ESPN to WP:RSP just so you can use RSP correctly. Here is the right way to do it. Example one: I needed...

with other genealogy sites, such as Ancestry.com (RSP entry), FamilySearch (RSP entry), and Geni.com (RSP entry), Findmypast should not be interpreted with...

Marketwatch to be generally reliable, although it is not discussed by WP:RSP. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 19:22, 27 October 2022 (UTC) @Russ Woodroofe: Ahh...

references are WP:RS, Kirkus and Common Sense Media are listed as reliable on WP:RSP. Additionally, Publishers Weekly is a longstanding, reputable magazine that...

reliable per WP:RSMUSIC; although some concern would come up due to the RSP entry on AllMusic, you should be fine, as you're using a review to verify...

April 2023 (UTC) Delete. Only non-self sources are Techcrunch, which WP:RSP mentions is questionable for establishing notability. It's also worth noting...

Actors, despite a recent RfC considering that source to be reliable (see WP:RSP), so perhaps that section is out of date. Link20XX (talk) 23:07, 6 October...

news agency with a similar reputation to the Associated Press (RSP entry) and Reuters (RSP entry). — Newslinger talk 15:22, 21 May 2020 (UTC) Yep, AFP is...

Who's Who (autobiographical, not independent, generally unreliable at WP:RSP). Pilaz (talk) 17:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

somewhat similar to SparkNotes, which lacks consensus on its reliability at WP:RSP. The GraduateWay source appears to be a sample paper without an identifiable...

IGN are just fine per RSP, so the VALNET sources aren't necessary to meet GNG. Comicbook.com is also not VALNET, doesn't have an RSP entry, and seems to...

3 November 2022 (UTC) *Keep secondary Reliable sources are trustable WP:RSP, in Wikipedia guide line this news sources is pass WP:THEHINDU. D 🐕 B 🦇K🐞...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) doesn't meet WP:GNGACTOR, Non include WP:RSP Claggy (talk) 05:51, 25 May 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

in-text attribution. I hope this helps. I leave it to others to update WP:RSP.—S Marshall T/C 12:09, 25 October 2021 (UTC) un-archived from Archive 329...

2, with no editorial policies, 3, a contributor piece, 4, non-RS per WP:RSP). Other independent, reliable sources are mainly product coverage (e.g.,...

which is not reliable. Please replace with a reliable source. WP:VGRS and WP:RSP is a guide to filtering sources. GeraldWL 06:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC) They've...

is generally not reliable enough to establish notability, as listed on WP:RSP. -Kj cheetham (talk) 21:24, 22 June 2022 (UTC) So one final question, if...

Russia definitely fall under a reliability spectrum. For example, per WP:RSP, Kommersant is generally reliable whereas TASS is generally unreliable. Russia...

VentureBeat are not considered highly reliable in by many editors. See WP:RSPS. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 00:37, 30 October 2025 (UTC) Weak Delete I found...

are those even reliable sources? (EDIT: yes, they are RS according to: WP:RSP.) It's pretty borderline, but perhaps these three sources (1) and (2) and...

February 2020 (UTC) @Ms96 It seems that you don't familar with wp:RS or wp:RSP, for example independentpersian or news.gooya are not reliable. Rest of them...

RfC omits crucial information that is only provided in that table and WP:RSPS. By retargeting it to the link I am suggesting, we solve both of these problems...

and similar fallacies in future discussions. See also WP:RS, WP:RSN and WP:RSPS if you want to assess existing sources. ZeroJaguar (talk) 16:57, 31 May 2026...

directing towards institutional profiles, and the remaining citations being non-RSP, currently does not pass WP:SIGCOV. There could possibly be more sources...

Djflem (talk) 20:10, 5 July 2019 (UTC) Crunchbase (RSP entry), Discogs (RSP entry), and IMDb (RSP entry) are similar databases for different subjects...

Ippantekina (talk) 03:51, 29 June 2022 (UTC) Medium is not reliable, please see WP:RSP. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 14:56, 30 June 2022 (UTC) I know. In this case...

removing Aon, it should probably be discussed in an RFC and added to WP:RSPS when concluded. 47.19.209.230 (talk) 18:17, 14 May 2022 (UTC) https://www...

and similar fallacies in future discussions. See also WP:RS, WP:RSN and WP:RSPS if you want to assess existing sources. ZeroJaguar (talk) 16:57, 31 May 2026...

substantial coverage and focus on him himself by RSPs. However, they both come from the Telegraph. A single RSP writing about him does not meet notability criteria...

be Forbes.com contributor pieces, which are considered unreliable (see WP:RSP). Other pieces are published by Grammarly inc., or appear on news release...

reliable sources, including New York (RSP entry), GQ India, CNET (RSP entry), Fox News (RSP entry), and BBC (RSP entry). Since most potentially useful...

WP:NPODCAST. There are full reviews in multiple independent sources listed at WP:RSP as generally reliable. TipsyElephant (talk) 23:57, 11 December 2023 (UTC)...

it's got some decent coverage; fwiw the source is marked as "reliable" at RSP. The People source that is now dead doesn't mention this song at all [3]...

reliable for sports coverage (EssentiallySports, MiddleEasy, Sportskeeda per WP:RSP), the independent reliable source coverage amounts to a 2015 MMA Mania suspension...

Wrld, so WP:NOTINHERITED. The newer sources are all low-quality and not WP:RSP: The Sun, TMZ, HotNewHipHop, XXL Mag, vladtv.com - these are all trivial...

Telesur is a state-owned propaganda outlet similar to Sputnik (RSP entry) and Press TV (RSP entry), and should be considered generally unreliable. — Newslinger talk...

14:51, 14 July 2020 (UTC) Keep, Tech Crunch is a reliable source per WP:RSP, and the dismissal of the Manila Standard as “local news” is ludicrous. Manila...

list of sources commonly discussed with regards to their reliability at WP:RSP. Victor Schmidt (talk) 06:00, 22 May 2021 (UTC) Can File:Ye Ethiopia Lijoch...

Technica article about him with significant coverage. Both reliable per WP:RSP. Hmr (talk) 02:17, 24 March 2025 (UTC) Keep Subject looks notable and has...

recognition or mention in well-known and reliable publications (as required by WP:RSP), the colleges don’t have the visibility or significance needed to meet notability...

WidgetKid chat me 15:51, 14 January 2026 (UTC) Keep - The subject passes WP:RSP. Google search results confirm that the subject is covered across multiple...

which is not significant or secondary IMDb, which is not reliable (see (RSP entry)), significant, or secondary a casting announcement at Variety, which...

AlterNet [WP:RSP § Generally unreliable] See WP:RSP#AlterNet. AlterNet (10 in 9) 10 9 1.111 181 LiveJournal [WP:RSP § Generally unreliable] See WP:RSP#LiveJournal...

from WP:RSP-listed sources: The New York Times (RSP entry): xenophobic and conspiratorial sites, such as JihadWatch.org [1] BuzzFeed News (RSP entry):...

reviewer, but I know About.com is generally considered unreliable per WP:RSP. Also I'm aware that HitParadeItalia is a depricated source for Italian charts...

and similar fallacies in future discussions. See also WP:RS, WP:RSN and WP:RSPS if you want to assess existing sources. ZeroJaguar (talk) 16:57, 31 May 2026...

local TV affiliates (all reliable sources even if not explicitly named at WP:RSP), but can't assess the degree of WP:SIGCOV. I'd say WP:GNG is likely met...

there are numerous high-quality sources listed in the citations per WP:RSP, including BBC News and the BMJ. Well-sourced facts about notable people...

references that I hadn't previously put in as the ToI is described at WP:RSP as "a reliability between no consensus and generally unreliable". I saw today...