Wikipedia:Tiers of reliability

Tier 1: most reliable

Peer-reviewed publications

  • Peer-reviewed articles in academic journals
  • Literature reviews, systematic reviews, and other review articles
  • Peer-reviewed conference papers
  • Examples:
    • Malawey, Victoria (2014). "'Find out what it means to me': Aretha Franklin's gendered re-authoring of Otis Redding's 'Respect'". Popular Music. 33 (2): 185–207. doi:10.1017/S0261143014000270. S2CID 161360928.
    • Lordi, Emily J. (2016). "Souls intact: The soul performances of Audre Lorde, Aretha Franklin, and Nina Simone". Women & Performance. 26 (1): 55–71. doi:10.1080/0740770X.2016.1183981. S2CID 194498055.

Academic books

Tier 2: more reliable

Non-peer-reviewed academic publications

Mass-market books

Highly-reputable international journalism

Tier 3: reliable

Tertiary sources

Other generally reliable news sources

Expert self-published

Tier 4: limited use

Non-expert self-published

Questionable sources

Primary sources

See also

Policies
  • Verifiability (WP:V)
  • No original research (WP:NOR)
Guidelines
Explanatory supplements
General essays
Topic-specific essays
  • Identifying reliable sources (history) (WP:HISTRS)
  • Identifying reliable sources (law) (WP:RSLAW)
  • Identifying reliable sources (science) (WP:SCIRS)
  • Identifying reliable sources (medicine) (WP:MEDRS)
  • Identifying and using style guides (WP:STYLEGUIDES)
  • Using maps and similar sources in Wikipedia articles (WP:MAPCITE)
Other
  • Reliable sources/Noticeboard (WP:RSN)
  • Reliable sources/Perennial sources (WP:RSP)
  • Common knowledge (WP:CK)
  • How to mine a source (WP:MINE)

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.