User talk:WFinch

Hello, WFinch, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Newyorkbrad 20:31, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have left some responses betwen your comments on my talk page. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 08:07, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting in touch, Kevin -- I've replied to your replies on your talk page. Thank you, too, for your invitation to the novels project. I'll consider that. -- WFinch 13:07, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The NA is to enable us to search for articles that have missing ISBNs (where such are available) and also point out to people that ISBN are truely not applicable. The section in the ArticleTemplate you needs it the "Release details" on which can be used to give the various editions. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 13:21, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi Walter -- I just took a quick look at The Doorbell Rang -- rather, its page. (I can't believe that it's the first time I've seen it, but I believe it is.) I took a peek at the edit history and note that you've done quite a bit of editing to the page. I didn't take the time to see who has contributed what, but it does look as though you've adopted it as a sort of pet sub-project.

I write because I do think that the text needs considerable cleanup. There are errors of diction (for example, MV uses the term "syntax" when she means "diction" -- a distinction that any true believer would make), of fact (as to what the book says, as distinct from what the article now says the book says), genuine POV/OR (the comment about what the FBI would prefer to keep private), and so on. Most of the text that I find problematic appears to have been contributed by ModusVivendi, but, again, I haven't pored over the edit history.

I intend to clean it up, and to focus on the text -- not the matter on adaptations, references, infoboxes and so on. (I do think that the initial quote was well chosen.) I just wanted you to know that I'm going to start on this and to solicit your thoughts -- again, I know you must have spent a lot of time on this page already. TurnerHodges 23:30, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that's good to read. Yes, it's come a long way, but the article needs so much help. I haven't edited much of the Plot summary. In the Introduction, I did add the quote and some content about Fred Cook, but that section is still pretty choppy. I wish I could have kept the book cover for The FBI Nobody Knows, which I had added; but I removed it after discovering that a book cover may only be used on its own article. I may still create an article for that book; I find that people are surprised it was real.

The Epilogue was a pet project, since that was information I found that could be related without editorializing. (If you haven't come across it yet, see Where There's a Will for another story about the FBI and Stout. Incredible, as Mrs. Bruner would say.) But if you see the neutrality of the article being lost anywhere, go for it. Thanks for improving this article, it's another important one. — WFinch 04:05, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Oh, yes — "the parts it would prefer to keep private," which is in the "Of further interest" section. I named that section, but I kept looking at that wording... just as I've tried to fiddle with editing in the Plot summary before I've given up. Minor edits aren't going to do it. Good. — WFinch 04:23, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm continuing this here rather than on the Doorbell discussion page because heaven knows how long it would take to get a broader response. I'll probably post there after you and I kick this around a little.

I've done an extensive rewrite of the plot summary but don't wish to put it up before I know what should be done about other matters. My principal issue is that the Doorbell page should be about the book, not about Cook. The information about Cook, and about Stout's problems with the FBI, is important, no doubt about that, and I certainly don't wish to hide it. (In fact, I confess to considerable anti-Hoover bias and I hope it doesn't show.)

I would recommend putting the material that's presently in the section titled Epilogue on a separate page, linked from both the Doorbell page and from Rex Stout's page. The information in Epilogue is only tangentially related to Doorbell.

I have also rewritten the Introduction and the Of Further Interest sections to make them npov. Again, that can go up after it's clear what will happen to the Epilogue. BTW, the formatting of the Epilogue material does not make it clear what is from a contributor, what is from Mitgang, and whether the M. A. Jones material is from the Freedom of Information files directly or as quoted by Mitgang. If it's all Mitgang, then I'm not sure that it fits within the fair use guidelines -- it would be a very long quote. At any rate, that needs cleanup and it should probably be done by the contributor who provided it (MV?).

Your thoughts?

Regards, TurnerHodges 21:09, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this part of the discussion may as well stay right here. I'm not certain the original contributor(s) are even active here these days, and this essentially concerns the Epilogue (not MV, ME).

I've taken your point about the Epilogue, and about Mr. Mitgang, too, who would certainly be one who would not appreciate too lengthy a quote. I've ruthlessly cut out material more suitable for the Fred Cook article, and information already on the Rex Stout page.

I hope what remains relates specifically enough to Doorbell to stay with the article. As a "tail," I'd like to see the FBI response to the book stay here. I'm looking forward to seeing how you've incorporated the Cook information, and you should just put up your rewrite whenever you're ready.

Thanks for your consideration, by the way. There could be a lot more of it here, I've found. — WFinch 00:14, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, it's up. The changes for neutrality that I made in the Introduction -- which I renamed Prologue, BTW, to parallel the Epilogue -- and in the Of further interest sections are very minor: just some softening, really. I did add a note referring the reader to the Rex Stout page, where the Mitgang material now figures prominently. I do think that it belongs there as part of Stout's real life rather than of Wolfe's imaginary one, in particular because of the echoes from the past in the way that today's administration runs its own Star Chambers, drumhead courts martial, phone taps without warrants and signing statements.

I hope the new plot summary meets with readers' approval, and yours. As I was editing the old one (a project I gave up -- I decided I had to start from scratch) I kept notes on the reasons I was deleting and changing, and I halfway expect to need them later on.

As to "consideration," yes, there's a certain coarseness to the nature of the communications on Wikipedia, and what I read as acting out behavior. I find that I miss CompuServe's old moderated forums, where sysops enforced civility and encouraged courtesy. The administrators could do more of that themselves, but as I read their comments, some of them seem to be working out their own personal issues in this relatively anonymous medium. TurnerHodges 15:55, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd struggled with editing the existing plot summary, too, and got depressed at the prospect. Now, it's — well, it's remarkable. I don't believe there's a single Wolfe book article more important to have done well here. And now I see that poor Clifton Fadiman needs to be taken under somebody's wing; splendid... Well, if that wants to haunt me it'll have to take a number.

Heaven knows where the term Epilogue came from (not the novels project template, I can tell you) but I like there being a Prologue to go with it. It occurred to me that every episode of the old Efrem Zimbalist TV show, "The FBI," would end with an Epilogue, so maybe that burrowed its way out of my subconscious. In any case, that device brackets off the Cook/FBI material nicely and puts the emphasis where it belongs, on the book. I can't believe you'll have to defend your changes. Thank you for the exceptional work you put into this one. — WFinch 20:59, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[Hi there — Would you revisit the article for the film Meet Nero Wolfe and reevaluate your tagging it as a stub? Although this is a relatively new film article, I don't believe it's a stub. There's also a template visible at the bottom of the article that's redlinked. Thanks, WFinch 15:36, 4 September 2007 (UTC)][reply]

The major thing that is lacking (see templates on talk page) is the "film image" - a poster or DVD cover for the infobox. Once that's added, it can easily be upgraded to start. SkierRMH 20:12, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see your talk page; it's easier for me to keep the discussion together in one place, so I've replied there. — WFinch 21:29, 4 September 2007 (UTC) [Done. All of the template requirements are now fulfilled, I believe. Will you edit the article and talk page to reflect that? Thanks, WFinch 21:27, 4 September 2007 (UTC)][reply]

I updated the article page, but left a note on the talk page thereof. The "filmimage" is not a screen shot, but the film poster, or DVD or VHS cover scan. SkierRMH 02:36, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[Thanks for removing the template from the article page. You're right, the "filmimage" I've put in the infobox is not a screenshot — it's a scan of an original, vintage promotional photo, as described in the fair use rationale on the image page. This is a little-seen 1936 film that, among a great many other titles, has never seen a legitimate release from the studio. It's never been issued on DVD or VHS, so there is no cover to scan and no screen to shoot. Perhaps, though, the note you've left on the talk page will draw the attention of an editor who has a copy of the film poster, although I would think this image is adequate. I expect this happens from time to time with old, obscure films. Thanks for your attention. — WFinch 03:46, 5 September 2007 (UTC)][reply]

Just letting you know that, following our discussion on my talk page, the "Nero Wolfe novellas" category has met its doom. (Yes! It was me! In the library, with the candlestick!! And I'm not sorry, you hear me?!! ... *ahem*) --Paul A 08:19, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No tears will be shed. The category title "Nero Wolfe short story collections" matches what's been done for Sherlock Holmes, and that's just as it should be. I also see that Murder Is Corny (detective story) zips over so nicely to Trio for Blunt Instruments — clean as a whistle. Thank you. — WFinch 16:30, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Stout-ABAV-2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:05, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The image has been placed in the article And Be a Villain. — WFinch 20:12, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Stout-TDR-2.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:14, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is one fast bot. I've added the rationale, removed the tag and placed the image. WFinch (talk) 00:22, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Re piping in disambig pages, we do use pipes for things like italics for proper titles. See that, and the other exceptions, at WP:PIPING. Thanks :) -- Quiddity (talk) 21:19, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, sorry — I got carried away. I got one "Once" right, anyway, and I'll restrain myself from here on. Thank you. — WFinch (talk) 21:24, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Smitrovich-TDR.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Rubinek-TDR.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Stout-NQDE-2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:NWM-Fritz.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:17, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:NWM-Saul.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:17, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Stout-TMD-2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:17, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:NW-Theodore.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:NWM-Orrie.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nero-Wolfe-DVD.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as A Family Affair (novel), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/s/rex-stout/family-affair.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:A Family Affair (novel) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:A Family Affair (novel) with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:A Family Affair (novel).

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:A Family Affair (novel) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:50, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This article has been blanked by another contributor to allow investigation of copyright concerns, but though the material in question was placed by you, you were not advised. I'm giving you the requisite "form letter" above, since this contains all the handy wikilinks and pertinent information that you may need for verifying permission if you did utilize this from an external source. (I'm sorry for the presumption the form makes that you are a new contributor. I suppose the original contributors to that template thought it better to welcome unnecessarily than not to welcome when needed.) I see that the language is replicated at a number of other sites. If perchance you utilized material from a press release or blurb, it will need to be rewritten unless we verify permission. Some companies (though not all) do permit reuse of press releases, but many forbid commercial reproduction or modification, and text placed on Wikipedia must be licensed to allow both, unless it conforms to our non-free content guidelines. In a similar vein, it seems that you also placed the extensive quote from Time in this article. This will need to be abbreviated to meet our non-free content guidelines for text, perhaps highlighting one or two phrases by the review's author and otherwise briefly summarizing his perspective.

I've reset the clock on this investigation to be sure you have a chance to participate. I'm watchlisting your talk page but am also watching the article in case you are able to help clarify this situation. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:50, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The material in question was not contributed by me. Please review the edit history of the article; it was added November 28, 2007, by a user named Mdtalley, after my edit of November 12. I see the notice on that user's talk page, but there has been no response. I would suggest that the blanked material be removed from the article. — WFinch (talk) 14:15, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake; I'm sorry. And since the contributor was advised, there's no need to reset the clock. :) With respect to the quote from Time, which you did contribute (double-checking :)), I'll create an abbreviated version of that to put in the article after the copyvio has been cleaned. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:22, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for putting in a link in the tempo plate for the show. Do you know how to make a table of contents above the episodes, same as other shows? I've tried to figure out, since show has a third season coming and this would make it easier to go to individual seasons if someone wanted, instead scrolling down the entire page. TH43 (talk) 08:59, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You made me think a minute... The best way to handle it, I realized, was to add the "References" section that had been requested (and I added "External links" for good measure). I think once more than three sections exist in an article, a "table of contents" box, complete with links, appears miraculously at the top of the page. And there it is! —WFinch (talk) 16:34, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see — an article can have as few as two section headings and still have a "contents" box at the top. The problem had been with the formatting of the section headings, which had been bracketed by three equal signs rather than two. So that's the secret, using the larger type with the rule below. —WFinch (talk) 16:58, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what the second paragraph means, but thanks. Btw, I moved the websites/link from "References" to "External Links". That's where they belong. I also updated the official site for the show, by removing the mention of episodes, I've checked the site, episodes aren't listed there. TH43 (talk) 23:12, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The far less valuable Viking book club edition may be distinguished from the first edition in three ways: ...

Rather than putting this paragraph in every Wolfe book article, I think it would be better style to refer briefly to a single page, either on WP (an article about the Viking book club, or book clubs in general, or book collecting?) or elsewhere (if such a website exists). —Tamfang (talk) 20:47, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Mystery Guild editions began with And Be a Villain. Feel free to edit the articles if you think of a better way to help people make the distinction; it's a frequent point of confusion. —WFinch (talk) 21:05, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stout-TGS-full.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.

• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.

• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 20:00, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:12, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've noted that there's a hard-working individual going through a long list of novels and adding the "stub" category tag to the articles based on the assessment on the associated talk page. This came to my attention with The League of Frightened Men and I note that a number of other Wolfe novels have been so tagged. The individual in question seems well-intentioned, and the problem seems to be that the assessments themselves are out of date and way, way too low. My Wikipedia contributions have been very minimal lately; I wondered if you might be interested in taking on the task of upgrading the assessments for at least the Wolfe novels. Thanks in advance for your attention to this note and any effort you feel you can expend. Accounting4Taste:talk 15:54, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, there — seems like old times. You've brought me back from the brink of what may have been a permanent Wikibreak. Certainly, I'll follow your lead with ABAV and upgrade the NW novels classed as stubs. I appreciate all the attention you've given to the detective fiction works here, particularly the Stouts. — WFinch (talk) 01:49, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I did find criteria at Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Assessment#Quality scale. I wouldn't think any of the Stout novels would classify as stubs, but I've left the class and/or tag on those that do need a bit of work. — WFinch (talk) 13:41, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Much obliged for your efforts (and your kind words). I looked at the quality scale and distilled it (possibly to its detriment) to a rough-and-ready rule of thumb: if it's got more than three references, it ain't a stub LOL. The same reviewer has worked on some novels by Christie, Queen, Sayers, etc., so I have a little bit of work to occupy me. (I realized a few weeks ago that I hadn't actually contributed any information to the 'pedia in months, and that I was more of a traffic cop/Miss Manners than I felt was good for me, so I have been reassessing. But I like contributing actual information about detective fiction.) Cheers. Accounting4Taste:talk 15:18, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

W,

(And I wonder how much you like that nickinitial.)

I have tried twice today to send you email regarding Too Many Clients. Both messages bounced back from your postmaster, flagged as spam. I'm using the same To: and From: as I have in the past and there's nothing unusual in either the Subject line or the body of the message. I partly just thought you ought to know (or perhaps you did). And partly I wanted to express bemusement. Regards, TurnerHodges (talk) 00:34, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WFinch. I think it's awesome that you're improving Nero Wolfe articles, but I'm curious - do you know the copyright status of the scripts you are linking to in some articles (eg The Silent Speaker)? That is, is it legal for nerowolfe.org to be publishing them? If it's not, and the site is violating copyright by posting them, I think we're not supposed to link to them, so I just wanted to check in with you and see if you can say for sure that we're safe on this. keɪɑtɪk flʌfi (talk) 22:33, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there. The script PDFs were given to the Wolfe Pack by Sharon Doyle, head writer and consulting producer for the A&E series. The webmaster would be able to confirm that they're posted legally on the site, as I believe they are. — WFinch (talk) 23:25, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds reasonable. Carry on :) keɪɑtɪk flʌfi (talk) 23:39, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please if you have time and you know anything to it (I have seen that you have made edits in the article area which owns relations on it) , please look on the article Audio theatre, somebody placed a erase discussion on it. after we have had a merge discussion. It would be interesting what you would say to the merge and the delete discussion. And possibly it could help to contact other people that they should help also. )-: Merry Xmas --Soenke Rahn (talk) 14:18, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Book-League-of-America-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:48, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:F&R-colophon.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:50, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stout-DLAD-1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 07:02, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Radio Hall of Fame inductees, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.--JayJasper (talk) 16:05, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Wolfe-NW-ABC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:18, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to thank you for your excellent work on the Devroy article! I very much appreciate it. 88guy88 (talk) 20:20, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much; it was a great pleasure. It's turned out to be a pretty fun read, too. — WFinch (talk) 23:54, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WF: I feel puzzled. What's the purpose for your removal of the references by Nasaw and Bogdanovich? Thanks. Doc. DocRushing (talk) 15:47, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Doc. Re: the Citizen Kane article — Those two sources are already cited inline (the preferred method, I believe) with specific page numbers in the section headed "Notes". That's why I removed them from the "bibliography" section, which seems a bit POV since it isn't comprehensive. Its being listed in the "bibliography" gave disproportionate attention and weight to the Nasaw book, which is cited only once in the article — that's what got my attention. As for the Welles-Bogdanovich book, I've cited that specifically myself in my contributions to the article, and it appears repeatedly in the section headed "Notes".

I'll happily restore those two titles to the "bibliography"; but maybe the method of listing sources, references and notes on this article could use some discussion. Thanks. — WFinch (talk) 16:20, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK. No problem. Thanks for the explanation. Doc. DocRushing (talk) 20:07, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:March of Time, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 01:54, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Citizen-Kane-stamp-1999.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:06, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Citizen-Kane-stamp-1999.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:34, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	I recently ran an experiment deleting 100 random external links. Only 3 were reverted; you were one of the 3. Well done! --Gwern (contribs) 19:58 30 May 2012 (GMT) 19:58, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for for the barnstar and the explanation — Ann Devroy would be proud of me. — WFinch (talk) 00:40, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your cut/paste move of It's All True. Please note that cut/paste moves should be avoided as we need to retain the history of an article for copyright purposes. Also note that disambiguation pages are only located at pages ending (disambiguation) if there is a primary topic. Please see WP:MDP for more details. Thanks. Tassedethe (talk) 01:30, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. As a more knowledgeable editor, can you move It's All True over the redirect that's in place on the correctly titled page It's All True (disambiguation)? I know that moving the "It's All True" page is preferable, but the disambiguation page already exists — and redirects to the page that appears to be titled incorrectly for a disambiguation page. I wasn't savvy enough to figure out how to do it correctly. — WFinch (talk)

This afternoon, as you may have noticed, a new anonymous user removed some content from Citizen Kane.
Do you concur with his action or his explanation in his edit summary?
A matter like this appears to be down your alley.
Thanks.
DocRushing (talk) 21:03, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it wouldn't hurt to segregate each negative review to its own paragraph. We seem to have lost the thread of the Bergman comments.

As for the first negative review, this is how the citation reads in the online source:

"Excerpted from Ray Carney's, 'Citizen Kane on its Fiftieth Anniversary: The Greatest Movie Ever Made?' The Christian Science Monitor, Tuesday, April 30, 1991."

Actually, the byline on that Christian Science Monitor article — which is titled Orson Welles and 'Rosebud' Ride Again, as near as I can tell — is David Sterritt. He invited various film experts, most of them educators, to weigh in on the significance of Citizen Kane on the eve of its 50th anniversary revival. Ray Carney is one; there are eight others, who are pretty positive in their views on Citizen Kane.

Also, what's presented online in that source is not an excerpt: it actually expands on what's contained in the Christian Science Monitor article.

Still, neither version grants Citizen Kane any praise whatsoever. The closest Carney comes to noting any technical achievements is to remark on its "tendentious photography." So, I think the edit can stand, FWIW, since it accurately communicates his opinion. The anonymous editor evidently knows something about that. — WFinch (talk) 01:22, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Roger. Thanks much. DocRushing (talk) 01:30, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wolfe-NWM-Pearson-CP.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:23, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Wolfe-NWM-Pearson-OMDB.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:43, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Wolfe-NWM-Pearson-DOAD.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:53, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		Silk Purse Award
		Superb work at Murder in a Small Town... keep it up! Cavarrone (talk) 07:07, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why, thank you — it's rather a sweet little movie. It's my pleasure to help people find out more about it — and learn about it myself at the same time. — WFinch (talk) 20:43, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nero Wolfe may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
' (1992 edition), pp. 301–336. Subsequently published in ''Nero Wolfe: The Archie Goodwin Files]'', edited by Marvin Kaye. Wildside Press, 2005, pp. 240–297. ISBN 1-55742-484-5.</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:35, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wow — good catch. Thanks, it's fixed. — WFinch (talk) 02:31, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent article on Hearst's yacht Oneida. The Wikipedia article on Hearst should have a link to this article. I have information on Hearst's other yacht Hirondelle II that I'd like to provide so you can write another great article. --Chrisbye (talk) 04:48, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to George Coulouris may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *''Beekman Place'' October 7–31, 1964) as Samuel Holt

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:59, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - all fixed. — WFinch (talk) 23:44, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Wolfe-NWM-BID-A&E ws.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:20, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Wolfe-NWM-HWM ws.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:20, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Orson Welles radiography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)

| align="left"| '''[[Treasure Island]]'' by [[Robert Louis Stevenson]]<br>Cast: Orson Welles (adult Jim Hawkins, [[Long John Silver]], Arthur Anderson ([[Jim Hawkins (character)|Jim Hawkins]]), | align="left"| ''Les Misérables'' by Victor Hugo<br>Cast: Orsone Welles ([[Javert]], [[Walter Huston]] ([[Jean Valjean]]; with Ray Collins, Everett Sloane, Edgar Barrier, Alice Frost, William Alland, ]'' by [[George S. Kaufman]] and Edna Ferber<br>Cast: Orson Welles (Dan Packard, Larry Renault), (Marjorie Rambeau (Carlotta Vance), [[Hedda Hopper]] (Millicent Jordan), [[Lucille Ball]] (Kitty http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film3/blu-ray_reviews53/the_stranger_blu-ray.htm ''The Stranger'' Blu-ray]], DVDBeaver review of Kino Classics release that includes this broadcast as supplementary material.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:36, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating The Squirt and the Monkey, WFinch!

Wikipedia editor Danielj27052705 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Well written, sufficient information and well selected references.

To reply, leave a comment on Danielj27052705's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks for reviewing it, Danielj27052705 — I bet that title got your attention! — WFinch (talk) 01:28, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for all of your efforts on these articles. Best regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:27, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Newyorkbrad — it feels good to get that done. It should be easier for people to find the stories, figure out which is which, and add information. Lots of room to grow, now. — WFinch (talk) 13:24, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It sure is easier now. Great work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mirawithani (talk • contribs) 13:33, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I write to you because you are the most frequent editor to The War of the Worlds (radio drama). There has been some research done by historians and professors that there was far less panic the night of the radio play, and that not many people actually were listening that night. I've put a link to a podcast about this on the article's talk page. If you have time, maybe you could incorporate their research into the article. Sincerely, Kingturtle = (talk) 13:02, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello WFinch! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Women artists. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Women artists, a WikiProject aimed at improving the quality of articles about women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the WikiProject Women artists page for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Members". I look forward to your involvement!

SarahStierch (talk) 06:18, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Orson Welles Show (radio) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{Infobox Radio Show
• | caption = [[CBS Radio]] promotional photo<br>{September 5, 1941)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:55, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A belated thank you for adding the information on additional early Rex Stout short stories to our Rex Stout articles. This drew my attention to the FictionMags index and enabled me to locate these stories for a Wolfe Pack project. (Please let me know offline if you would like copies.) Best regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 15:20, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up since you do lots of work on this article. I did a further edit about Cotten suffering a stroke in 1981 plus put a IC in about that and his autobiography.

Also I just discovered that Cotten had his larynx removed in 1990 due to throat cancer. Here's a source[1] for it. Maybe you want to work that into the article too....William 17:53, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finding that story — it's helpful to have that context and I've added it to the article. —WFinch (talk) 18:10, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rosebud-Newsweek.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:11, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Chlotrudis Awards 1995 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Annual awards ceremony of an obscure local club, which club's article was just deleted for non-notability through AfD. No evidence of sources referring specifically to the subject of *this* article which meet the GNG's requirements. Orphaned article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 06:10, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Chlotrudis Awards 1996 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Annual awards ceremony of an obscure local club, which club's article was just deleted for non-notability through AfD. No evidence of sources referring specifically to the subject of *this* article which meet the GNG's requirements. Orphaned article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 06:11, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Chlotrudis Awards 1998 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Annual awards ceremony of an obscure local club, which club's article was just deleted for non-notability through AfD. No evidence of sources referring specifically to the subject of *this* article which meet the GNG's requirements. Orphaned article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 06:12, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Chlotrudis Awards 1999 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Annual awards ceremony of an obscure local club, which club's article was just deleted for non-notability through AfD. No evidence of sources referring specifically to the subject of *this* article which meet the GNG's requirements. Orphaned article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 06:14, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Chlotrudis Awards 2000 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Annual awards ceremony of an obscure local club, which club's article was just deleted for non-notability through AfD. No evidence of sources referring specifically to the subject of *this* article which meet the GNG's requirements. Orphaned article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 06:15, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Chlotrudis Awards 2001 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Annual awards ceremony of an obscure local club, which club's article was just deleted for non-notability through AfD. No evidence of sources referring specifically to the subject of *this* article which meet the GNG's requirements. Orphaned article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 06:15, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Chlotrudis Awards 2002 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Annual awards ceremony of an obscure local club, which club's article was just deleted for non-notability through AfD. No evidence of sources referring specifically to the subject of *this* article which meet the GNG's requirements. Orphaned article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 06:15, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Chlotrudis Awards 2003 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Annual awards ceremony of an obscure local club, which club's article was just deleted for non-notability through AfD. No evidence of sources referring specifically to the subject of *this* article which meet the GNG's requirements. Orphaned article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 06:15, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Chlotrudis Awards 2004 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Annual awards ceremony of an obscure local club, which club's article was just deleted for non-notability through AfD. No evidence of sources referring specifically to the subject of *this* article which meet the GNG's requirements. Orphaned article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 06:16, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw your edit on Kane and wanted to reach out a personal thanks. I've just finished a c/e on the whole article, and noted several bits which needed cleaning, as obviously different editors have added different pieces over the years. The redaction of the Rosebud Yellow Robe subsection and incorporating into the existing discussion of Rosebud was desperately needed. I was going to get to it in the next week or so, but nice job! Thanks. Onel5969 (talk) 13:58, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, too, for your work on the article. The bit I reworked this morning was someone's recent addition and very far afield, I thought. That's tightened up now. — WFinch (talk) 22:40, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Citizen-Kane-Souvenir-Program.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:26, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I don't know how plausible this is for you geographically, but I wanted to make sure that you are aware of this (coming up next month): http://welleswoodstock.com/year-2014/ http://www.woodstockoperahouse.com/files/Events/PerformancePages/2014Welles_Festival.html

KConWiki (talk) 01:03, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again, especially for the links — I'd heard about the festival but didn't have the details. I'll look into that. — WFinch (talk) 12:58, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again - As with last year, I don't know how practical this is for you in terms of your location, but I want to make sure you are aware of the Welles events going on in Woodstock IL in May 2015: http://welleswoodstock.com/year-2015/schedule-2015/ KConWiki (talk) 19:17, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stout-ITBF-full.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:59, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've read the statement that Stout received, and ignored, a HUAC subpoena or invitation numerous times (not just on Wikipedia and sites sourced from Wikipedia), and even used it in talks I've given myself, so I will try to find corroboration for it, including from the HUAC files at the National Archives if need be. I'll let you know what I turn up.

Meanwhile, on the related subject of Stout's FBI file, which was extensive, I strongly recommend the book Dangerous Dossiers by the late Herbert Mitgang. Best regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 03:54, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please — if you can nail down that HUAC business (and you'd be just the one to do it) that would be outstanding. I've only seen the statement in sources that I think found it on Wikipedia. Thanks for rising to the challenge.

Dangerous Dossiers — I do have that; it made my day when I spotted a copy at an antique mall a few years back. "Prematurely anti-Nazi" — Mitgang found a wonderful way to put that. But oh dear, I didn't realize that he had died. — WFinch (talk) 04:25, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just last November—a few days before I gave a talk about Stout's FBI file to the Wolfe Pack Assembly, using the book chapter as well as the copies of Stout's file that Mitgang placed at the New York Public Library as my prime sources. (But I didn't realize that he had died until much later, and in fact had tried to reach him around the time to see if he might want to give the talk.) Should we add a little bit more from Dossiers to Stout's article? Will keep you posted as to HUAC. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 13:12, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to see more, myself, because people find that period interesting and it's so relevant today — and Stout was such an example. I'd contributed some material awhile ago that I found in the Mitgang book, but there was such a level of detail that the consensus was to move the bulk of it to the articles on Where There's a Will and The Doorbell Rang. Oh what a shame, I bet Mitgang would have been a wonderful speaker. — WFinch (talk) 17:33, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The National Archives advises me that Stout has a file in the HUAC records. I will take a look at it the next time I am in Washington and copy anything interesting. (How to source anything I find there for on-wiki use may be another matter. I might need to write an article about it, and then I can cite that. :) ) Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 14:23, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, yay, and oh jeepers, re: the citation. I hope there's a way to cite it, but it's nice that there's always the Gazette. The WP would be thrilled to see it first. You oughta be a detective. And I sure hope you find something worth reporting! — WFinch (talk) 22:52, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Would you care to review my FA nomination for the article Of Human Feelings? The article is about a jazz album by Ornette Coleman, and the criteria for FA articles is at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 01:05, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stout-Recipes-1949.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:04, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Firstly I admire your work on Citizen Kane and other Welles related articles. I was just wondering if you (of all editors) had any thoughts about getting an article ready for TFA for Welles' 100th birthday in May? It seems very appropriate. I've only ever worked on Chimes at Midnight and don't foresee doing any additional work on that article until Callow's third book is published, which unless I'm mistaken is scheduled for May. Do you think Kane needs much more work to be ready for a GA nomination, let alone FA? The thing is FA nominations can take some time to get started by reviewers so if you did agree that Welles' birthday would be a great day for a TFA, the sooner the better.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 03:29, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you. I hadn't specifically thought about article status of any of the Welles-related articles, I'm just trying to improve them across the spectrum. I have especially wanted to get the Orson Welles article in good shape for the 100th anniversary of his birth, since many people will be looking at it on that day. Citizen Kane seems in quite good shape to me, so if you're familiar with the process perhaps you can start moving it forward — TFA would be wonderful for May 6. I did see at Wellesnet that Simon Callow's book will be delayed a bit. — WFinch (talk) 15:35, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, that probably would be the best article for May 6. One recent book called Orson Welles in Italy is on the one hand a bit boring but on the other hand has some good info about why Welles really moved to Europe in the late 1940s, which I think needs some expansion in the article since so many people have different theories about that. Unfortunately the book goes on way too long and becomes really redundant at times.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 17:48, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Would you object if I cut out about half of the block quotes used in Kane and turned them into paraphrased sentences? This was one of the main two suggestions from the articles Peer Review (the other being sourcing all material) and after re-reading the article I would agree that it would be an improvement.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 23:31, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Mankiewicz had only received two screenplay credits since 1935, and he needed the job." - I think this is very misleading. Mank was working on scripts uncredited, which has always been a very common practice (script doctoring) and was especially common in the studio era.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 03:57, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to trim it. It wasn't my initial contribution, but I cut it, and then restored it when I thought there was an appropriate place for the information. — WFinch (talk) 04:06, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have you considered creating a new article entirely about the writing of the script and its controversy/debate? It seems warranted and it would make Citizen Kane shorter and more readable. I know of film articles with supporting articles like Interpretations of 2001: A Space Odyssey and even Early life of David Lynch, but I'm not sure about the precedent. I think the entire "Sources" section would also go nicely there, and everything could be summarized in a few paragraphs in the Kane article. Do you mind if I ask about it on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Film board?--Deoliveirafan (talk) 04:05, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me it'd be better to keep everything together, but checking with the Film Project sounds like a good idea since they should be aware of the work being done on this article they consider core to their work. The length doesn't bother me; the structure of it makes it quite readable via the TOC box. — WFinch (talk) 04:15, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yea but the length will definitely bother a lot of people tasked with reviewing and promoting the article. I'm very confident about that, be prepared for a lot of requests for trims. I'm just going to ask about it on the board.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 04:22, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good. You're probably right; there are a number of "main article" links throughout the Orson Welles article itself, and one for "Sources" would probably work. — WFinch (talk) 04:25, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For possessives, I've been using " Welles's ". But I've also noticed some " Welles' ". Do you know which is correct?--Deoliveirafan (talk) 05:38, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They're both correct, really, but the consensus was to go with "Welles's". Some editors arrived at that before I even touched a Welles article, so I've been routinely fixing any "Welles'" I find. — WFinch (talk) 15:28, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stout-TMC-4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:23, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

		The WikiProject Film Award
		I, Onel5969 (talk) 22:04, 22 December 2014 (UTC), hereby award WFinch the WikiProject Film Award for his/her valued contributions to WikiProject Film. Particularly on the article, Henry B. Walthall - Nice Job![reply] Awarded 22:04, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Is there a WP policy somewhere that states that, even if a photo occupies only 2% of an image, this means that the image should be in JPEG format? If so, please point me to this policy.

Moreover, shouldn't there at least be some template on the image description page to reflect that as a result of the image being a JPEG, 98% of it is poor quality? — Smjg (talk) 00:29, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am unable to point you to any policy. The original file is a jpeg. Please do what you think is best. — WFinch (talk) 01:03, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Doran-colophon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just out of curiosity, since you've done so much research in the scripting, are there really no comparisons between Mr. Bernstein and Arthur Brisbane, or references to Brisbane being Bernstein's model?--Deoliveirafan (talk) 04:15, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Boy, I haven't seen anything except Brady's reference to Carvalho, and that was buried pretty deep. — WFinch (talk) 04:24, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, just wondering. It was just a hunch on my part.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 04:58, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Do you have a copy of "Perspectives on Citizen Kane"? I can't find it and it has a copy of Norman Gambill's interview with Maurice Seiderman, which I'm hoping will add another paragraph or two to the Make-up sub-section.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 03:20, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have the book, but I do have that 1978 issue of Film Comment magazine and it will add a lot. I'll contribute to that section. — WFinch (talk) 17:11, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cotten-American-9-31.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:23, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My intention was to remove Category:Orson Welles from any page where the subject's association with Welles is not a defining characteristic, though I now see that I removed more pages and files than I intended. I'll go fix that now. Trivialist (talk) 00:54, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know I asked User:David Fuchs, who did a peer review in August 2013, to take another look and do an unofficial second look review on the talk page. I figure its a good time to get an opinion on the article.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 01:48, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes indeed — thank you. — WFinch (talk) 02:11, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Even though it needs more work and (in my opinion) a few more expansions, I think you should nominate it for GA status now. A (good) nomination should provide a lot of feedback and checklists of things that need to be done and I think it would be a good time to get the ball rolling. If you do I'll keep an eye on it and help out with any work that needs to be done.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 19:52, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, there's a huge backlog of GAN's right now. Its your call, but you could always try to skip GA and nominate it for FA right away. If you nominate it I think you should also mention it on the Film Task Force board, hopefully the fact that its Kane will give it some extra interest. Also, just for the record, although I think that realistically the article should be split, I would personally prefer it to be all one big article. I read that exceptions are sometimes made for long articles, and I suppose that if any article on films would deserve precedent it would be Kane, so I think its worth requesting if you still want it to be one big article. But, time's running out.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 19:58, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stout-BE-1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:46, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stout-BE-2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:47, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stout-OMDB-2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:47, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stout-POD-1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:47, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stout-SBC-2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:47, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stout-SIT-1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:47, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stout-TMC-2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:47, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stout-AWFD-1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:20, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stout-AWFD-2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:20, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stout-BID-1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:21, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was just looking over this article, & saw that it has one item that will block it from being seriously considered for GA: there is a tag in the section "Themes" stating that the section requires expansion. Either the tag needs to be removed, or the section needs to be beefed up with more examples of themes in this movie. (PS, I wish I was better informed about movies so I could review this article; except for this one problem it feels a lot like GA or FA quality.) -- llywrch (talk) 05:43, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for giving it your attention, and for letting me know about that tag. I've just removed it; I think was added by the editor who was developing that section. — WFinch (talk) 05:50, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Citizen Kane you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BenLinus1214 -- BenLinus1214 (talk) 17:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. — WFinch (talk) 18:59, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Hats off to you for your outstanding work and edits made on the Perry Mason pages! Television fan (talk) 13:50, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What's your opinion on splitting up the article? (Like a page on "Authorship of Citizen Kane") I don't think it's too big of an issue but because it's come up before I just want to get your thoughts…other than that, it looks good and I'm about ready to pass. BenLinus1214^talk 21:03, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting the article has been recommended informally, and recent contributors are hoping to receive guidance on which section(s) to break out into their own articles. Creating a "Sources" article has been suggested, as well, since that information isn't so integral to the pre-production phase. Thank you so much for your time in going through the Citizen Kane article, I really appreciate it. — WFinch (talk) 21:22, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Personally, I don't think it's a big enough problem to deny or even put on hold a GA, but I would fix this issue before taking it to FA. BenLinus1214^talk 22:05, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, really, because both authorship and sources deepen the context of the film. That information isn't collected very well anywhere else, and breaking it off … Well, we'll see what the consensus is. Thanks again. — WFinch (talk) 22:20, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Citizen Kane you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Citizen Kane for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BenLinus1214 -- BenLinus1214 (talk) 00:41, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Orson's cigar Barnstar
	I haven't even looked into how to create a barnstar, but whatever. For your work on Orson Welles related articles, please have one of his cigars on his 100th birthday. --Deoliveirafan (talk) 13:28, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty darned nifty, and much appreciated. — WFinch (talk) 16:12, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The GA star
	For your excellent work on Citizen Kane. You deserve it. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 14:55, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, probably should have pinged you before, but if you haven't already noticed I did this a while ago and it looks like the ball is beginning to roll on it.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 01:33, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thank you — no, I hadn't seen that. That's good news, and it'll be fun to get back to this. — WFinch (talk) 03:10, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Deoliveirafan:In case you both haven't seen it yet, I've started the peer review. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 13:54, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, very much appreciated.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 16:17, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have my thanks, as well, for your thought and effort on the Citizen Kane peer review. — WFinch (talk) 13:10, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wonder if you've ever noticed something like this on some of your uploads? When I discovered this some time ago, I'd seen quite a few of your uploads with WPA licenses thrown "into the net". The user has tried for adminship twice. I also keep score :-) and this was one of the reasons I became inactive there in March. We hope (talk) 12:54, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you; I noticed it in February, IIRC, with uploads from the Federal Theatre Project and The American Magazine. It took me a little while to figure out what was going on, but I certainly didn't appreciate his level of zeal until reading this. Maybe I should keep score, too, since the files he's tagged are so clearly public domain it's comical. — WFinch (talk) 15:44, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stork-Club-Cub-Room-November-1944.jpg Take a look at the bottom of the page-Zorro strikes again! :/ We hope (talk) 01:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, so I see. I counted, and more than four dozen of the files I've uploaded since February 7 have been caught in this sifting, more than half of them Federal Theatre Project images. Someone on his talk page asked what was going on, and he seems to feel that even though it's a sloppy procedure it does catch some bad images. Fine, but I wish he'd purge his "Possible DR" pages once he's made his review. I doubt that anyone really pays attention other than the uploader, but it's aggravating. — WFinch (talk) 13:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He's more El Kabong than Zorro; these PD images have been grabbed for potential deletion requests, too: File:FDR-Memorial-Fala.jpg + File:Fala-detail-FDR-Memorial.jpg
I'll soon be uploading another offending file. — WFinch (talk) 15:36, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How about this guy? :-) Am wondering when something's going to be done about this because all he seems to be succeeding at is offending veteran users. We hope (talk) 15:48, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you asking for both or only one of the pictures to be deleted? If only one which one? Rmhermen (talk) 20:16, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for checking — please delete the image file entirely. It won't be used in the article at all. WFinch (talk) 20:21, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In case you are interested, the subject episode will be shown on MeTV this Thursday, June 25 at 11:30 PDT. http://metvnetwork.com/schedule/2015-6-25 Television fan (talk) 15:30, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you — it will be much more interesting viewing now that we know the backstory! And I'm looking forward to the series beginning all over again. — WFinch (talk) 15:37, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed! Television fan (talk) 19:56, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sources for Citizen Kane, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://thoughtriotcore.blogspot.com/2015/02/citizen-kane.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:19, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sources for Citizen Kane requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://thoughtriotcore.blogspot.com/2015/02/citizen-kane.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:32, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which came first, the AFI notes or the TCM notes? Do you know for certain that AFI is the originator? For my part, I've been awrae of the TCM notes for years, but only saw the AFI notes recently, so my (personal) impression is tha TCM is the originator, but I'm more than willing to be shown to be wrong. BMK (talk) 01:28, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, maybe answering my own question: the AFI FAQ has details on how the notes are assembled, so I guess they're the originating source. BMK (talk) 01:32, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, there's a graphic at TCM that reads "Powered by AFI" (on the "Notes" page it's part of the border, upper right side). Thought they should get some credit. — WFinch (talk) 01:42, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't see that graphic, thanks for pointing it out. I'll use AFI in the future for the Notes material instead of TCM. (Those notes usually contain a lot of good material.) Another subject - why do you think your update of the Algiers poster (and my update to your update) isn't showing up in the article, at least for me, even when I purge my cache? BMK (talk) 02:21, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thank goodness it's not just me — I can't imagine why the new upload hasn't shown up yet. I've never seen anything like it. If it's really stuck, maybe tomorrow you can upload that last edited poster image (thank you) as a separate file, and the other can be orphaned and deleted.

The AFi graphic is so very small I'm not surprised you didn't see it — I doubt anyone sees it. That AFI site used to be pretty stingy when it came to accessing that information, but they appear to have loosened up. The fact that they cite the sources they use … that's very helpful. — WFinch (talk) 03:31, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea about the re-upload. I'll check tomorrow. BMK (talk) 03:35, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Did you remove Lily Furedi from the Notables section because she was not sufficiently notable or because you believe she wasn't in the project? Delabrede (talk) 23:48, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I see it was the latter. My evidence that she was in the FAP comes from the 1940 US Census. She told the census taker that her occupation was "mural painting" for the "WPA Art Project." See https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:248W-JYG -- Delabrede (talk) 23:55, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Very good! Thank you — I've just reinstated her name, and cited the 1940 census after checking Ancestry.com. I'll add her name to the List of Federal Art Project artists. — WFinch (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see you beat me to it. Thanks again. — WFinch (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours!

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:55, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the image from Caesar to the Alice Frost page. I appreciate your help. Eddie Blick (talk) 16:10, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're certainly welcome — I'm happy you've created an article for her! She's one of the many unsung Mercury Theatre people. — WFinch (talk) 16:12, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are several problems you have been making to "First National Pictures" on film articles:

• It is generally advised that if a redirect works, not to change it. You can take my word for that, or I can look up the page for you.

• "First National Pictures" was a redirect to the article "First National", so by the above, it was not necessary to change it.

• "If you were going to change it "[[First National]] Pictures" would not be the way to do it. "[[First National|First National Pictures]]" would be correct

However, that is all water under the bridge now, as I have moved the article from "First National" to "First National Pictures", where it should have been in the first place. Too many other institutions are called "First National" for a defunct movie studio to be the primary target for the phrase. Thus, links to the article should now be [[First National Pictures]]. I'm correcting ones that I've come across, but you should probably change the other ones you did as well. Thanks, and Happy New Year, BMK (talk) 23:45, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Black Legion.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the improvements to the Timberline Lodge article, especially for the wonderful images you have added. Good work! — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 18:49, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thank you! What a story that is — very moving, and important to tell. — WFinch (talk) 20:31, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WFinch, I am Pretzel4. Thank you for your edits to the Gunstock article. I do a lot of editing on NH skiing articles as well, and I saw on your user page that you are into Nero Wolfe! I am a big Nero Wolfe fan as well. See you around Pretzel4 (talk) 04:41, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well how about that — hello! The A&E TV series got me started reading the Nero Wolfe stories, and from there I've gone on and on … including editing Wikipedia. I learned a lot from the little bit of editing I did on the Gunstock article. Thanks for your message, I'm glad we ran into each other. — WFinch (talk) 06:01, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, hope you've been well and belated Happy New Year. How do you feel about the current quality of the article? I was thinking that it may be a good time to request a new Peer review, specifically with FA-status in mind. Also, not sure if you'll like this suggestion (and again my personal preference would be for it to be one long article), but had you considered shortening it by adding a new page for the entire "Style" section?--Deoliveirafan (talk) 04:54, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi—good to hear from you. Yes, a peer review would be helpful. I'd left a message on the talk page many months ago about splitting out the "Screenplay" section (no replies). It'd be a chore to summarize, but that would be a good stand-alone article, I think. I'm not so sure about the "Style" section as a stand-alone, though. Some guidance is needed, if anyone will weigh in. (For the sake of convenience, this is the link to an earlier discussion.) Thanks for your continuing attention to this. — WFinch (talk) 17:54, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've created the article Screenplay for Citizen Kane and trimmed the Kane article accordingly. It's a good enough start, I think. — WFinch (talk) 19:58, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you reverted my edit (where I fixed dates "On January 10 Parsons and two lawyers" -> "On 10 January Parsons and two lawyers") with the explanation "flagged to use mdy dates since May 2012". Could you please explain? Flagged by whom? Where can I see those kind of flags? On another note, am I the only one to see errors with references in the article? mixer (talk) 17:17, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there — A template that appears in edit mode at the very top of the article—"Use mdy dates|date=May 2012"—is a note to editors that month-day-year date format should be used consistently in the article. This is undoubtedly because Citizen Kane is a film that was produced and released in the U.S., where that is the conventional style; see MOS:DATETIES.

If there are reference errors they should be corrected. At present Citizen Kane is classed as a Good Article and it's been regularly maintained, so if the corrections are extensive or controversial it might be best to discuss them first on the article's talk page. — WFinch (talk) 17:45, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explaining. This is how I see the article's references: http://i.imgur.com/h5jTf3K.png mixer (talk) 13:54, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. That isn't an error, actually. It's a style of citing sources inline with the text.

• A citation that appears as "[7]:174" identifies the reference in the References section—the clickable "[7]" shows you it is Barbara Leaming's book—and then shows you the specific page cited, page 174.
• Lower-case letters in brackets—[a][b]] and so on—are explanatory footnotes, linking to the Notes section.

At some point when you're reading the article you stop noticing those things. But when you want to know the exact source of the information very quickly, it's a very handy style. — WFinch (talk) 14:41, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"[7]:174" type of references are really irritating. They interfere with the flow of reading for the vast majority of people (very few would need to quickly know the specific page of the reference). But this is not the place to criticize. And apart from voicing my first impression, I am definitely not the person to do that. Thank you for bothering to explain. I learned a lot! mixer (talk) 09:29, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Screenplay for Citizen Kane, WFinch!

Wikipedia editor Garagepunk66 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I enjoyed reading the article about the controversy surrounding the screenplay of Citizen Kane. The article is well-written and researched. Really nice.

To reply, leave a comment on Garagepunk66's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi, do you know why the PR was closed? Wikipedia:Peer review/Citizen Kane/archive3 Deoliveirafan (talk) 01:19, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea. I'm not familiar with the procedures; is there an expiration date for pending reviews? — WFinch (talk) 12:56, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah — the removal of inactive reviews is discussed here: Wikipedia:Peer review/Request removal policy#Removal. — WFinch (talk) 13:02, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lame. Maybe submitting it for a CE would be better, although those are usually just for style. I think all of the citations are formatted correctly and there are no issues with additional citations needed right?Deoliveirafan (talk) 15:06, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Right, I think the copy is well written and the citations are very solid, so that won't be a problem. — WFinch (talk) 15:10, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Another editor brought up a very good question regarding Hopper's quote in the pre-release controversy section, see this edit by Piledhigheranddeeper. I don't have access to the source, but it would make more sense if Hopper said vicious, rather than viscous. Do you have access to that source? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:05, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have the book, I looked it up—and it's an error. The word should be "vicious". I'll fix it straightaway, and thank you.—WFinch (talk) 20:50, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Byron-Burford-1960.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Perry Mason (TV movies)

added links pointing to Vanessa Williams, David Warner, Tony Roberts and Scott Valentine

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Raymond Burr, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Count Three and Pray. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your creating the link. My attempt to create a link on Niesen's name caused a problem, so I had to undo it. I'm glad that you knew how to do it correctly. Thanks! Eddie Blick (talk) 02:08, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure—thanks for creating that new article. The sortname template is nice but a bit screwy to use. — WFinch (talk) 02:12, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Doc's just started up this contest about topics and articles covering Classical Hollywood cinema. Do express if you are interested or not by signing up under the "Editors Interested" section. Thanks.  — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 10:16, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I was made aware just a few hours ago about the distinction between "cultural references" and "in popular culture". sorry that you are having to revert them. just know, I am now up to speed on the rule. thanks --Jennica✿^{Ping Me!} 13:58, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note. I was happy to see the heading was suggested as a more encyclopedic alternative when I was editing articles with closets full of unsourced trivia. — WFinch (talk) 14:02, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@WFinch: I still feel like "in popular culture" is relevant for some articles, like bands or songs but I already had that debate with someone else/helpdesk today, heh. --Jennica✿^{Ping Me!} 14:12, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 19:10, 26 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For your excellent expansion work on Fred Fishback. Lugnuts Precious bodily fluids 18:49, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Trent McMullen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced biography of a living person.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 15:05, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Joseph Calleia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shearonink -- Shearonink (talk) 05:00, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. — WFinch (talk) 14:34, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	Congratulations, it's a...
	...Wikipedia Good Article!! Shearonink (talk) 18:21, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Joseph Calleia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Joseph Calleia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shearonink -- Shearonink (talk) 18:41, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your 17:03, 26 March 2017‎ WFinch (talk | contribs)‎ . . (34,145 bytes) (-41)‎ . . (Undid revision 772308778 by Savolya (talk) - rv to trim excessive detail per Template:Infobox person)

But the Template says; For deceased persons still married at time of death, close the date range with death year.Savolya (talk) 18:09, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it now reads correctly, with the last entry in the "Spouse(s)" field reading "Lewis Tipton Stringer Huntley (married 1980–1994)". The year of William Conrad's death was 1994, and that closes the date range. — WFinch (talk) 18:36, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Herman-Shumlin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Topper-Colorized-VHS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:McNair-TIME-1942.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Great work! You are more accomplished with photos than I, please note there are even more photos here [2] that could be uploaded including a close-up of Madge Evans. Cheers!--Milowent • ^hasspoken 21:07, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! And thanks for your work with these images, and for finding others. I'll certainly get them into the Commons. — WFinch (talk) 22:37, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Crowd-1928-Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions in Robert Osterloh's article, both for the photo and for the biographical information.--Isinbill (talk) 15:30, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I'm happy you noticed the additions. I'm glad I was able to connect his having important roles in two important TV pilots. I only wish I could find an additional photo, but it will do for a start and I'll keep on the lookout. — WFinch (talk) 23:31, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain your thinking behind this revert [3]? Given that there are a series of pictures of the film which appear directly below the plot section, and given that the plot section is fairly brief, moving this picture up seems to not make much visual sense to me and instead to unnecessarily squeeze the text. Thanks. Grandpallama (talk) 13:33, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, I'll put it back. — WFinch (talk) 18:34, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Back Street (1932 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Boles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:47, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for jumping in and adding to the article. It's a pleasure to meet another fan of Stout's stout detective. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 16:08, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed! I'm so happy you've added an article for The Wolfe Pack — that's been long overdue. — WFinch (talk) 16:41, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was surprised that there wasn't already one as there is for Baker Street Irregulars. I guess I am also a bit surprised that there is no WikiProject for Nero Wolfe as there is for WP:SHERLOCKHOLMES, not that the SH WP is active at all. If you need any help with any articles I'm happy to pitch in. :) ThaddeusSholto (talk) 17:28, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Norman-Foster-1927-Vandamm.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:51, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Cornelia Otis Skinner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Campbell Playhouse

Jane Eyre (1943 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Campbell Playhouse

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MacLeish-Fall-of-the-City.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WFinch, I come to you asking for you're aid in helping to finish the formation of a current page, Earl Holliman filmography. I made it myself in honor of the actor, who is also my personal friend, and I am trying to complete it using the table format for his self appearances and awards/nominations but despite what I try I can't seem to hit the nail on the head (plus, being at personal warfare with a nasty cold doesn't help my either). You seem to be keen on this type of style appearance and if you can by any chance help me to update the last 2 sections of his filmography page and have it all said and done, I would be so grateful and appreciative! Plus, someday in the hopefully near future I'd like to show this off to Earl and make his day down the road. Hope you can lend a hand, finish the page appearance, and thank you for taking the time to read/consider this on my behalf. Thank you againBlack BIC Ballpoint (talk) 21:29, 7 February 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Hi there — I've given the filmography a quick look, and I'll work on it. I think that integrating his appearances as himself into the appropriate sections (film or television) in chronological order would work best. I'll also start finding some citations for the content. (The Internet Movie Database isn't generally regarded as a reliable source for that information; see Wikipedia:Citing IMDb.) It could take some time but I'll pick away at it. — WFinch (talk) 22:34, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, I agree inserting his self appearances orderly into film/TV will be good so in time will needn't have a separate slot for self-appearances and I so admire how quick you jumped in too! Yes, it may take time, but with you're helping me it'll prove worth it once all is said and done. Thanks so much again and keep up the good work.Black BIC Ballpoint (talk) 10:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Campbell Playhouse (radio), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Bad Man (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@WFinch: On 18 March 2018 you replaced an image of Ada Louis Comstock with a better one. Thank You! Since then, I have nominated the article for an ACR, and a reviewer has this question:

File:Ada_Louise_Comstock,_1923-1943_(13083782855).jpg: per the Flickr :tag, are more specific copyright tags available? Nikkimaria (talk) :13:34, 24 March

2018 (UTC)

My skill in this area is rather limited, so could you help me out here?

. Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/WAVES Pendright (talk) 05:04, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I checked the image file at the Commons. The marginal text on the original version states that it is from the Radcliffe Archives, and the Schlesinger Library posted the file at Flickr in 2014, stating that there are "no known copyright restrictions". The institution itself has made the image available, so the licensing tag used when it was uploaded at the Commons in 2016 is appropriate and sufficient.

The image depicts Ada Louise Comstock in her professional capacity at Radcliffe, and is stamped with an archival ID number. Since the institution's library posted the image at Flickr, it's evident that "the institution owns the copyright but is not interested in exercising control ... or has legal rights sufficient to authorize others to use the work without restrictions". Further discussion could take place at the Commons. — WFinch (talk) 12:24, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Pendright (talk) 06:31, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Van-Doren-TIME-1957.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed that you undid my edit on Nero Wolfe's page. I checked the link that you placed, about the use of grammar symbols in quotations, and I found a mistake in what you did. But also in what I had done. I removed comas from sentences, placing periods instead. You completely reverted it. But please look the following example placed in the "use of grammar in quotations":
"Fish are friends, not food", said Bruce.
In that quotation the coma is outside the citation, but there is no period. So I did wrong adding the period, but I did well moving the coma and you did wrong completely undoing my partial good edit.
So, given this, I will edit again the page with this new information about how things should be done; I hope the will be no misunderstandings between us. 95.253.203.9 (talk) 06:45, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gaslight (play), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patrick Hamilton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. — WFinch (talk) 00:00, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

…you contributed to Wallack's Theatre. It's a great find and a perfect fit! Vzeebjtf (talk) 23:25, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm glad it works — there's so much buried over there! — WFinch (talk) 23:48, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you strict? TMProofreader (talk) 12:29, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Conrad-Maltese-Falcon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rex Stout 1931.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Joan-Greenwood.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. SchroCat (talk) 19:50, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Joan-Greenwood.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Sorry for the revert. Yeah, God knows any day now, research will prove that Harlon Bloch or Mike Strank isn't in the picture. FWIW, Ira Hayes is easily identifiable in the Genaust footage, and Strank is not wearing his helmet, just his soft cover, but by the time the Rosenthal picture was snapped, Strank was all but totally obscured. Posting this on my talk page and yours. Best. Sir Rhosis (talk) 21:35, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to [email protected], so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at [email protected].

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dracula-Stage-Play-Edition.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WFinch. I saw you removed “Category:Recipients of the Meritorious Service Medal (United States)” from the Chuck Wilson (USAF U-2 pilot) article with the comment, “trim category that is not the same as the Defense Meritorious Service Medal”. I agree that the Defense Meritorious Service Medal is not the same as the Meritorious Service Medal, but Wilson was awarded both of these medals. So I think your category removal was in error. Would you please recheck? Thank you. Skeet Shooter (talk) 03:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you — I've reinstated the category. I initially missed the content stating that he had both awards, but now I see it in the grid. It's now in his Commons category, as well. — WFinch (talk) 14:38, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Skeet Shooter (talk) 14:45, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Macbeth-1948-Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have done a lot of work on the list List of Perry Mason episodes article a few years ago. Would you care to weigh in on the dispute going on there now? Dharmabumstead (talk) 01:28, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The dispute resolution discussion for this was closed by the moderator due to lack of participation by the other party, who instead decided to try to fork the page and add their changes to that (which earned them a 24-hour block). In the mean time, the page protection has expired on List of Perry Mason episodes. Would you mind adding your opinion to the talk page there, so there's a clear consensus visible? Thanks. Dharmabumstead (talk) 22:01, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Blue-Angel-Illustrierter-Film-Kurier-1930.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. TheMuscovian (talk) 12:00, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please see my edit summary about The Grand Duchess. If you can cite a source that gives the dates of production and other details, feel free to reinsert. All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 09:08, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; I've done that. — WFinch (talk) 13:34, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Isabella-Ward-Pasadena-Playhouse.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you were the last to update the page for Holy Sepulchre Cemetery (Worth, Illinois) and if I knew how, I would try doing the following by myself... The page for HolyS... cemetery in Worth, needs to "redirect" to the correct/updates article for Holy Sepulchre Cemetery (Alsip, Illinois).

It's confusing, as us older folks know it as being in Worth, but it's technically in "Worth Township," which in turn is in "Alsip, Illinois."

Hope this makes sense. Again, sorry for not doing it myself, but I don't want to mess something up. Thanks! XTOC6 (talk) 20:59, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there — I'll move the article from Holy Sepulchre Cemetery (Worth, Illinois) to Holy Sepulchre Cemetery (Alsip, Illinois). I know I was perplexed when I was working with the related category at the Commons. If a subsequent editor disagrees with the move, the article can be moved back or named otherwise; but at present, Find a Grave (here) identifies the cemetery as being in Alsip, Cook County, Illinois. Moving Category:Burials at Holy Sepulchre Cemetery (Worth, Illinois) here is somewhat beyond me, but it's been moved at the Commons. — WFinch (talk) 01:20, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Perry-Mason-Seid-Jacksons.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 18:31, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If able, could you please help to re-organize and re-format the newley created Peter Haskell filmography page? It would be much appreciated, thanks in advance.--Black BIC Ballpoint (talk) 13:43, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Defense Mediation Board, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National War Labor Board. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gladeon M. Barnes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Detroit Arsenal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Battle Cry of Peace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Richman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am the son of Paul T Carroll. I don't know who originally created this page back in 2009, but I am deeply appreciative of that person’s initiative and those that have submitted subsequent edits. I am contacting you because you did a recent editorial correction in February .2020. I would like to propose some edits of the artcle. At the very least, I would like to add a photo of my father (current photo is only of his gravestone) and a correction of the awards he received (two silver stars, not one, plus two Legion of Merits. Under Wikipedia conflict of interest policies, it is my understanding that I am not authorized to make edits because the subject of the article was my father. I am writing to request someone to serve as an independent editor/reviewer of whatever edits I propose. I have done significant research and have access to original family documents and photos. My research has also included reading dozens of transcribed oral histories which are held by the Eisenhower Museum in Abiline, KS. Additional information is available from a biography of my father recently published. Ike's Go To Guy, Paul T Carroll.

Another reason I am seeding assistance since I’m am not technically savvy enough to do the edits myself! I am prepared to work in good faith with whoever volunteers to assist me and to provide objective references and sources to back up all aspects of the proposed edits. Thank you for your consideration of this request Dwc451degrees (talk) 23:51, 25 July 2021 (UTC) David Carroll[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Its-All-True-Fortaleza.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:It's-All-True-documentary-poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

... for Wolfgang Hoffmann tweak & tweak! Cheers Shir-El too 18:08, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States Post Office (San Pedro, Los Angeles), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moderne.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, peoples rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension.

Happy Holidays. ―Buster7 ☎ 04:02, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Howard-Smith.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:50, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your work adding New Deal art stuff is such an inspiration. Thank you! jengod (talk) 17:07, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Goodness, how kind — thank you. Yes, the New Deal is worth no end of effort. — WFinch (talk) 17:19, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:Orphaned short|1=File:Samuel-Albert-Levine-1964.jpg}} —howcheng {chat} 00:05, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The-Front-Page-1928-FE.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lucille-Fletcher.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Wolfe-Stamp-Nicaragua.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Its-All-True-Fortaleza.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:19, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:F-for-Fake.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Welles-Time-FC-1938.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:LessThanKind-1 DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Stout-DFM-1.jpg

(I would like it for a personal project, not for use on Wikipedia.)

Thank you! AdrienneLeigh (talk) 07:02, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do have a hi-res scan that I can upload at Commons, now that I know that The American Magazine art is in the public domain. I'll pop back here and let you know when I have it cleaned up and in place there, where you can download it. Thanks for reminding me there are probably a few similar instances with the NW art I uploaded here. — WFinch (talk) 13:44, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, i'm hunting for various NW-related ephemera and might be in touch with you again if that's okay? Again, this is for a private personal project, i can point you at other ways to contact me if you'd rather take it off-wiki. AdrienneLeigh (talk) 03:25, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This one's another one I'm hunting for, for instance, and nobody but NOBODY has 1961 issues of Argosy anywhere online. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Stout-TPM-1.jpg AdrienneLeigh (talk) 03:26, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Commons version of the title illustration for "The Twisted Scarf" is now in the infobox. I'd recommend searching eBay for a copy of that issue of Argosy, which is still in copyright. — WFinch (talk) 21:31, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

No $$ right now for the Argosy issue, sadly, especially for something no one but me is ever going to see! However, are you sure a 1961 Argosy issue is still in copyright? I can't find evidence that the copyright for that year of Argosy was ever renewed. AdrienneLeigh (talk) 01:35, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another question: on the Booby Trap page, I see that you uploaded both internal illustrations. Is there also a teaser image with headline, the way there is on most of his American Magazine stories? (Like the Twisted Scarf one -- the image from the very front of the article). If so, could you please upload that too? AdrienneLeigh (talk) 04:26, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same question on this one: do you have the part with the title? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wolfe-Door-to-Death-1.jpg AdrienneLeigh (talk) 05:41, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stout-DFM-1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 23:23, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stout-TFBI-2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Small-Miracle-FE.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Helen Carruthers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frank Hayes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Street-Scene-FE-1929.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]