Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GrabUp was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:News18 Madhya Pradesh Chhattisgarh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GrabUp - Talk 12:59, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Satipem! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GrabUp - Talk 12:59, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WaddlesJP13 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Submission is only sourced by primary sources. Please include citations from independent and reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:News18 Madhya Pradesh Chhattisgarh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Waddles 🗩 🖉 05:33, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:News18 Madhya Pradesh Chhattisgarh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:31, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:News18 Madhya Pradesh Chhattisgarh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 15:12, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MMI Narayana Multispeciality Hospital, Raipur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MMI Narayana Multispeciality Hospital, Raipur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Rahmatula786 (talk) 12:15, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@OwenX I request my deleted article to be retreived as a draft so that I would make improvements to it. Satipem (talk) 16:00, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@OwenX @Jay I had an idea to create a hospital in Chhattisgarh called "MMI Narayana Multispeciality Hospital, Raipur". But this article got deleted. I had 9 citations that were news citation and they were reliable. Unfortunately, it got deleted because of insufficient notability and undeletion was not successful. What should I do to undelete and to make better improvements for them for making them notable. Satipem (talk) 05:57, 6 April 2025 (UTC) I'm also sorry for adding just 2 citations after the creation of my deleted article. Satipem (talk) 06:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See OwenX's response at WP:Requests for undeletion#MMI Narayana Multispeciality Hospital, Raipur. Jay 💬 06:21, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Now archived at WP:Requests for undeletion/Archive 408#h-MMI Narayana Multispeciality Hospital, Raipur. Jay 💬 17:54, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Satipem. Thank you for your work on Kharun River. Another editor, Cremastra, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start. I've marked this as reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Cremastra}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Cremastra _talk 00:00, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Guwahati City Centre Mall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable; only coverage is for a 2024 bomb threat.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Moriwen (talk) 17:07, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Moriwen: Please check i've added more citations into this page. If there is any problem, please know. Satipem (talk) 01:30, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sohom Datta was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Press releases are not a sign of coverage for notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Urban Square Mall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sohom (talk) 16:29, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Rosguill. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Nandan Van Zoo seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:58, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Nexus Ahmedabad One Mall. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:27, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CoconutOctopus was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nexus Ahmedabad One Mall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CoconutOctopus talk 08:35, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nucleus Mall, Ranchi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nucleus Mall, Ranchi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chanel Dsouza (talk) 11:10, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please check my article I've improved it with more and more citations and incidents Satipem (talk) 13:51, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please check, now i've made it? Satipem (talk) 05:01, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AirshipJungleman29 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nexus Ahmedabad One Mall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:51, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Helpful Raccoon@MPGuy2824 Hello once again (Helpful Raccoon for first-ever doubt). I want to add sources that is all about Nucleus Mall, Ranchi. I checked on Google but it just shows sources on Mappls, Yappe.in, etc and many other blogging sites. I also found their official website, which is also the blogging site made in Blogspot. How do I find reliable sources that are all about the mall and are reliable? I also have the same doubt about Nexus Ahmedabad One Mall, based on Alpha One and Nexus Ahmedabad One times, I don't find the news articles from major newspapers about the mall on Google Satipem (talk) 01:48, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Satipem, as I said on my talk page, such sources may not exist, in which case the mall would fail Wikipedia's notability standard. You should try looking for articles about the mall in the various Hindi/local language newspapers of the city in question. You might have some luck there. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:07, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I replace the "redirect" template with the original article state or not? If not, write other best methods to retrieve the article back to the original article state so that I can add more reliable citations from Google on "news" or others that will be reliable Satipem (talk) 15:07, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can add the references to Draft:Nexus Ahmedabad One Mall right now if you have more. You seem to have added some references a few days back, but haven't yet submitted the draft for review.

Next, for Nucleus Mall, Ranchi, since it was converted to a redirect as a result of an AfD discussion, I don't think that you should just recreate the article with some additional references. Instead, start a draft using the Article Wizard and submit that too for review. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:58, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Satipem. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:News18 Madhya Pradesh Chhattisgarh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Satipem. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "News18 Madhya Pradesh Chhattisgarh".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 15:26, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ClaudineChionh was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Just another non-notable, run-of-the-mill shopping mall.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nucleus Mall, Ranchi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 07:05, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilsebatti was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nexus Ahmedabad One Mall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thilsebatti (talk) 06:53, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Afstromen was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

No significant coverage in reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nexus Ahmedabad One Mall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Afstromen (talk) 18:33, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nucleus Mall, Ranchi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:58, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But its to hard to find coverage and mall's overview and reliable news, at least please help what steps Satipem (talk) 09:05, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for adding new sources, but I don't believe there is in-depth coverage of this mall. Housing.com only lists basic details like address. DNA and ToI sources have some coverage but not enough to base an article on.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nexus Ahmedabad One Mall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 04:02, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. While reviewing new pages, I noticed that a page you created, VR Nagpur, does not appear to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines as a standalone article. As an alternative to deletion, I've redirected it to Virtuous Retail. If you disagree, feel free to revert my redirect and we can proceed to a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. (If you reply to me here, please ping me as I am not watching this page.) Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:29, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Satipem. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nucleus Mall, Ranchi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:08, 15 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) caste-related topics in South Asia.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:14, 28 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Satipem. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nexus Ahmedabad One Mall, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 13 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Satipem. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Nucleus Mall".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:05, 13 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Satipem! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Doubt on sources for my trial reduction for my Sandbox list, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:05, 23 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Hello, after so much of hardwork on my Sandbox with the list of reliable sources for edit requests for each protected page (including the first 7 suburb talk pages, check out these talk pages by viewing my contributions or notice at the end of sandbox) of geography stubs of WP:CT/SA and changing to new and better reliable sources that exist and as per my apologies and stopping writing LLM (in major city articles), I'm writing the message to finalize my trial reduction. If done and notified to check the protection log, then please say the duration and level of protection, and if not, check the minorities if there are any and state the tips what to do. Thank You Satipem (talk) 06:15, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If you're asking whether you're now free to edit on contentious topics, per the #Introduction to contentious topics section above, then yes, you are: your user account now meets both the age and edit count requirements of extended confirmed. You still need to comply with the general contentious topics edit guidelines, though. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:25, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

No, I just want the trial reduction of protection from indefinite to temporary, as geography articles are usually non-controversial than the high-stakes caste, history, politics or military, that are months older and no conflicts are made after protection and are calm for days as per the edit histories of those articles, for more queries please contact the protector Yamaguchi. The main reason is that these are based on simple geography and as per the indefinite duration I'm concerned that new users would not simply edit, even though I've done 500 edits and if needed, especially for popular pages we should apply pending changes or temporary semi-protection. Thank You Satipem (talk) 13:40, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, geography can turn out to be just as controversial as anything else in a contentious topic. For a recent example, see Trump's attempt to rename the Gulf of Mexico. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:59, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

But here we are focusing on South Asia, if they are over a month or weeks old, then we should finalize our trial, following the recent CoronaVac reduction here, even though it was based on Coronavirus. Also, we should still use pending changes in popularized articles, so editing activity can be atleast both stabilised and accessible for all but with rules and regulations. @Rosguill:, @Blue Sonnet:, @Yamaguchi先生:, please know if there are any responsibilities so that we will decide whether to trial reduction or any other minorities, as we already discussed in administrators' noticeboard a month ago and Yamaguchi as the protector of these pages. Satipem (talk) 14:27, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

{{Admin help}}

Also, as per my clarification, they are not personal sanctions nor about caste, history or politics, I am just requesting a trial reduction from indefinite extended-confirmed towards temporary semi or pending changes (for popular articles), for the geography area of WP:CT/SA so that community and volunteers can improve them. Satipem (talk) 15:08, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

What does "trial reduction from indefinite extended-confirmed towards temporary semi or pending changes (for popular articles)" mean? You keep making these cryptic requests, but I for one don't even understand what you're asking for.

If this is a language issue, then perhaps you would be better off editing a Wikipedia in your native language instead? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:29, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I've commented out your admin help request. You are currently blocked from editing, and the only issue that should concern you is getting yourself unblocked. If you manage to do that, you can then request lowering of page protection by going to WP:RPPD and doing it in the usual manner, not by summoning administrators to your talk page. You will then also need to specify for which pages you want PP lowered; saying "popular articles" doesn't really tell us anything. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:23, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Correction to the above, you are of course only blocked from the article name space, and are therefore free to make PP requests at WP:RPPD already now, should you so wish. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:36, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Per the discussion about your sourcing issues at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive380#Request for trial reduction in geography stubs of WP:CT/SA and your request to add a 136-page document to source a single population number, I am blocking you from editing article space directly until you demonstrate that you understand how to properly provide sources. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:04, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Satipem (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I am requesting a sincere unblock request for my account, Satipem. In the beginning, I was expert in making articles about local places in cities and expanding regional stubs in lists of hospitals and malls. Though I was working hard for sincere trial reduction, I sincerely apologize for my misinterpretation on the Administrators' noticeboard for mistakenly using LLM and my effort to sincerely reduce the protection level of articles under WP:CT/SA and my mistake on knowing how to provide sources in such a manner. I am really sorry and apologize for my mistake and promise to provide sources in a good-faith manner while doing so and that too which are suitable and best serve for article, and especially aafter the request gets accepted and unblocked I promise to use reliable sources when improving my past drafts or make edit requests especially for my CT/SA downgrade when sincerely. Thank You Satipem (talk) 15:20, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your request is incoherent. In any case, I doubt you went from not understanding how to provide sources to understanding in a matter of minutes. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:30, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Satipem (talk) 15:20, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi admins, After I unblock, my new edit request for Chandigarh that would be suitable would be

1. Title: Demographic Profile of the City 2. Link: ^[1] I completely knew it was my small mistake and understand I already replaced with better citations dedicated for that city or town and stopped using LLM anymore earlier. Very Sorry. Satipem (talk) 16:30, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing: Hi there! I was just apologising for my mistake that I was just trying for reasonable request that would help my concerns about WP:CT/SA and downgrading the protection for a reason as they were indefinite, but I did not actually understand how to provide sources in a good-faith manner and for a mistake I used LLM for help while making edit requests. To ensure my unblock request gets accepted and would not be interpreted as incoherent, what should I do? Satipem (talk) 06:35, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Satipem (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I understand my responsibility and reason for my block. I know how my previous unblock request failed to address my core issues and used repetitive phrasing. I understand why my previous behavior as flagged as violation. After unblock I promise to:

1. Completely cease using LLMs or AI-generated dialogues or non-existent Indian censuses like 2021 or 2023 and submit manual, single-page requests at a time.

2. Follow verifability guidelines by using high-quality and relevant references. 3. Focus mainly on non-controversial stubs such as adding reliable sources to drafts until the action plan is accepted and under process. Satipem (talk) 07:48, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request appears to have been written by a chatbot using a large language model. The purpose of unblock requests is to determine whether you, the human operating this account, understand why you were blocked – not to test a chatbot's ability to tell us what we want to hear. A message written (or rewritten) by a chatbot can also cause you to sound like you're making empty promises. It is better to write the unblock request yourself. Please read through the guide to appealing blocks for more help. CoconutOctopus talk 12:10, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Satipem (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I was partially blocked from editing article space because I did not understand how to provide sources properly for an edit request. I've respected my block by taking a 5-day cooling-off period and I apologize for such a mistake. In the future, after my unblock, I will promise to state my evidences manually and work on non-controversial stubs until 2 weeks until my plan gets accepted such as adding reliable sources to a draft. I also promise to don't use non-existing or fake Indian censuses that were declined by Govt. of India for which my mistake in the AN archive link led to my block. Satipem (talk) 16:25, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I was partially blocked from editing article space because I did not understand how to provide sources properly for an edit request. I've respected my block by taking a 5-day cooling-off period and I apologize for such a mistake. In the future, after my unblock, I will promise to state my evidences manually and work on non-controversial stubs until 2 weeks until my plan gets accepted such as adding reliable sources to a draft. I also promise to don't use non-existing or fake Indian censuses that were declined by Govt. of India for which my mistake in the AN archive link led to my block. [[User:Satipem|Satipem]] ([[User talk:Satipem#top|talk]]) 16:25, 1 June 2026 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was partially blocked from editing article space because I did not understand how to provide sources properly for an edit request. I've respected my block by taking a 5-day cooling-off period and I apologize for such a mistake. In the future, after my unblock, I will promise to state my evidences manually and work on non-controversial stubs until 2 weeks until my plan gets accepted such as adding reliable sources to a draft. I also promise to don't use non-existing or fake Indian censuses that were declined by Govt. of India for which my mistake in the AN archive link led to my block. [[User:Satipem|Satipem]] ([[User talk:Satipem#top|talk]]) 16:25, 1 June 2026 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was partially blocked from editing article space because I did not understand how to provide sources properly for an edit request. I've respected my block by taking a 5-day cooling-off period and I apologize for such a mistake. In the future, after my unblock, I will promise to state my evidences manually and work on non-controversial stubs until 2 weeks until my plan gets accepted such as adding reliable sources to a draft. I also promise to don't use non-existing or fake Indian censuses that were declined by Govt. of India for which my mistake in the AN archive link led to my block. [[User:Satipem|Satipem]] ([[User talk:Satipem#top|talk]]) 16:25, 1 June 2026 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}