Welcome!

Hello, Macutty, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Wasted Sapience 00:35, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Macutty. Please don't add the sprotect tag to articles as you did here [1] because it doesn't do anything. Protection and semi-protection is a special software feature that admins have access to and it has nothing to do with the tag. The tag just informs editors that the page has been protected or semi-protected. If you feel a page needs to be protected or semi-proteced, you may request it here. Thanks, Sarah 15:31, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Macutty, welcome to wikipedia. I answered your question in the Peak Oil talk section. Perhaps you can help in cleaning up the article and find the references to articles that would balance it.Kgrr 14:36, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected/formalized all of the cited references in the Peak Oil article. I did not find any personal web pages although one reference points to the blog of a well-known economist. Please be a bit more specific as to which "special interest group" references you find objectionable. Some critical viewpoints do come from political think tanks such as Cato Institute for example. Also, please show me which sections are unbalanced in your opinion. Let's fix the article and get it to Good Article status.Kgrr 15:45, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo. I'm a journalist writing for Austrian Newspaper "Falter". I'm working on a story about war reporting on Wikipedia (focused on South Ossetia War). I would like to ask you a few questions via email about this subject (concerning neutrality and propaganda on Wikipedia). I would be really pleased, if you agreed to answer my questions. If you are interested just send me a message via my Wikipedia profile. Best regards, Wueddens (talk) 14:48, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a courtesy notice to let you know that you are under discussion at the administrators' noticeboard (WP:ANI). The specific section is Admin Resolute. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:51, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Going forward, please be sure to log in when you edit. Editing while logged out as a way to avoid scrutiny or to make it seem like multiple editors are involved is not allowed and may result in you being blocked. If you are in an insecure area but still insist on editing, use secure.wikimedia.org to log in and edit. If you continue to edit from multiple areas like this, you may be blocked from editing. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 01:00, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]