Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. MrOllie (talk) 20:30, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 20:28, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is not any vandalism. Agile is not any Project management methodology. Is is production process (software development) management methodology. Konsul28 (talk) 18:58, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 14:37, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I was only changing mistakes. Konsul28 (talk) 20:34, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is not any vandalism. Agile is not any Project management methodology. Is is production process (software development) management methodology. Konsul28 (talk) 19:03, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Agile Project Management (book), you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 21:19, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was only changing mistakes. Agile is not any Project management methodology. Is is production process (software development) management methodology. Konsul28 (talk) 19:04, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Process, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. MrOllie (talk) 12:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 12:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was only changing mistakes. Agile is not any Project management methodology. Is is production process (software development) management methodology. Konsul28 (talk) 19:05, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Last chance - please stop adding links to your essays. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Agile. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. MrOllie (talk) 12:25, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a place to spread your opinions, whether by spamming links to self published essays or by pasting such thoughts onto talk pages. Kindly stop. MrOllie (talk) 13:18, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was only changing mistakes. Agile is not any Project management methodology. Is is production process (software development) management methodology. Konsul28 (talk) 19:05, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 13:46, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a spammer. I was only correcting obvious errors in Wikipedia regarding AGILE. Agile is not a project management methodology, but a software development process management methodology. You're blocking access to true and current knowledge on this subject. Please unblock my account. Konsul28 (talk) 12:58, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was only changing mistakes. Agile is not any Project management methodology. Is is production process (software development) management methodology. Konsul28 (talk) 19:05, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #97774 has been closed by an administrator, who told you to post any further unblock request here. If you do decide to do so, you should include in your unblock request an explanation of the relationship between this account and the account Marek Prasoł, and why you have used more than one account. JBW (talk) 20:29, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Konsul28 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I'm not a spammer. I was only correcting obvious errors in Wikipedia regarding AGILE. Agile is not a project management methodology, but a software development process management methodology. You're blocking access to true and current knowledge on this subject. Please unblock my account. Konsul28 (talk) 12:57, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We are doing nothing of the sort, we are blocking a disruptive editor who was spamming Wikipedia. Since you don't think that you did anything wrong, the block will need to stay in place. 331dot (talk) 19:29, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.