DOKUMEN123.COM

laid out at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Shortcut WP:EPTALKWP:EPTALK Be bold in updating articles, especially for minor changes, fixing problems...

change, reply with text such as "I do not read either WP:EDITCONSENSUS or WP:EPTALK as requiring an affirmative consensus for Wikipedia edits. Can I find that...

months and years of second chances, I'm thinking we need to enforce WP:EPTALK. --Joy (talk) 08:33, 30 May 2026 (UTC) Comment I'm in favour of deletion...

months and years of second chances, I'm thinking we need to enforce WP:EPTALK. --Joy (talk) 08:33, 30 May 2026 (UTC) Comment I'm in favour of deletion...

months and years of second chances, I'm thinking we need to enforce WP:EPTALK. --Joy (talk) 08:33, 30 May 2026 (UTC) Comment I'm in favour of deletion...

months and years of second chances, I'm thinking we need to enforce WP:EPTALK. --Joy (talk) 08:33, 30 May 2026 (UTC) Comment I'm in favour of deletion...

months and years of second chances, I'm thinking we need to enforce WP:EPTALK. --Joy (talk) 08:33, 30 May 2026 (UTC) Comment I'm in favour of deletion...

months and years of second chances, I'm thinking we need to enforce WP:EPTALK. --Joy (talk) 08:33, 30 May 2026 (UTC) Comment I'm in favour of deletion...

months and years of second chances, I'm thinking we need to enforce WP:EPTALK. --Joy (talk) 08:33, 30 May 2026 (UTC) Comment I'm in favour of deletion...

it was sign that you must have stopped editing. (WP:AVOIDEDITWAR and WP:EPTALK) —Codename Lisa (talk) 07:31, 10 October 2017 (UTC) "since Lisa also forgot...

make reverts but intends not to discuss it, we have a problem. Also WP:EPTALK says " If you see a problem that you can fix, do so. Discussion is called...

out and explain to others what reasoning there is behind edits. Read WP:EPTALK - WP:UNRESPONSIVE - WP:CAUTIOUS.--Moxy (talk) 22:41, 24 August 2017 (UTC)...

remained civil. I would encourage both editors to follow WP:BRD and WP:EPTALK. if they can't get through their disagreement then seek WP:Dispute Resolution...

that actually matches the Wikipedia:Enforced BRD process is found in WP:EPTALK. It is not found at BRD. WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:47, 27 March 2026 (UTC)...

my edits should require pre-approval from other editors in breach of WP:EPTALK and WP:OWN, referring to “our article” [26] bans me from his talk page after...

19:14, 4 November 2023 (UTC) Actual policy basis for this advice is WP:EPTALK, WP:AVOIDEDITWAR and WP:RCD. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:08, 4 November 2023 (UTC)...

sense to tell editors that they must follow an optional process, but WP:EPTALK (which is mandatory for all editors) is less well-known, and perhaps they...

2024 (UTC) Overall, I think the policy that you want to consider is WP:EPTALK. Given our WP:UPPERCASE problems, and our telephone game approach to teaching...

months and years of second chances, I'm thinking we need to enforce WP:EPTALK. --Joy (talk) 08:33, 30 May 2026 (UTC) Comment I'm in favour of deletion...

carried away in the heat of the moment, that you understand and accept WP:EPTALK, WP:EW, WP:CONSENSUS and WP:OWN, and that from now on you commit to respecting...

Without a substantive objection there isn't really a dispute. WP:OWN and WP:EPTALK go into this. In my view, and I think policy backs me up on this, reverting...

mundane WP:CIR issue, but when someone ignores the sprit and letter of WP:EPTALK for years, this is more trouble than it's worth. Documenting this at LTA...

editors to RTFM while blatantly ignoring policies and guidelines such as WP:EPTALK. Adding an appropriate editing summary is not hand holding, it is a basic...

before I revert any of their edits which struck me more as a violation of WP:EPTALK than an olive branch, but even attempts to talk to them first seem to end...