Template talk:Russian far right

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Russia: History / Politics and law This template is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia This template is supported by the history of Russia task force. This template is supported by the politics and law of Russia task force. Politics This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics

@Mellk: You made several reverts claiming WP:DUE. Can you please explain why do you think that's the case? --Mindaur (talk) 20:38, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mindaur: For Putin, Kadyrov, etc to be listed under people of Russian fascism, and so on, they should be widely described as such by RS, and I do not see that as being the case nor is that reflected as such in those articles. If you think I made a mistake here, can you explain how? Mellk (talk) 00:31, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mellk: Sorry for late reply. You removed Rashism which is directly related, but I see it has been re-added by another editor. You've also removed Vladimir Zhirinovsky, but from the article: During the 1990s, commentators described Zhirinovsky as being a fascist, having fascist tendencies, or a neo-fascist. (backed by three references). -- Mindaur (talk) 23:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mindaur: Yes, I removed Rashism, that was one month ago when the state of that article was in much more of a mess. Now there is no reason for removal. Zhirinovsky has been described as fascist (at least in the past) but overall I think it is undue weight to include him here, in the same way that including Putin would be undue. Mellk (talk) 22:33, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see someone keeps trying to include articles such as Putinism and Nashism which have are very weakly or not supported, because it is their opinion that it is fascist. Mellk (talk) 22:48, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a paradox, but Pobedobesie probably belongs here. My very best wishes (talk) 22:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]