Template talk:Electric machines

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Electrical engineering This template is within the scope of WikiProject Electrical engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electrical engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electrical engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Electrical engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Electrical engineeringelectrical engineering Physics This template is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics

Which category does it belong in?

Uh, isn't the template a bit a large and unfocused? In my not so humble opionion, oversized theme ring boxes are by now the trademrak of enwiki, we can try to do better!

Remember, that for everything about electric motors there is category:electric motors, so the navbox should have some well specified purpose other than that.

I for one dislike to mix grouping by design with grouping by application, or to mix important core articles with curiousities. Also the main components of a specific electric motor design can be reached by ye olde hyperlinks in the article prose.

Comments?

--Pjacobi (talk) 19:34, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In past few years, the template has become a lot more focused and, in my view, useful. Great way to concentrate many links about a broad, generic topic such as electric motors.Cblambert (talk) 06:38, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Where would one put traction motors? Peter Horn User talk 02:46, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Traction motor is already in Special magnetic machines category.Cblambert (talk) 06:28, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]