Talk:Java War
| Java War was nominated as a Warfare good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (September 10, 2025, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
A fact from Java War appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 March 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WP:MILHIST Assessment
A very nice start, but not quite long enough to warrant B-class in my opinion. In point of fact, it even has a whole bunch of stub tags on it. Expansion is needed, if possible. LordAmeth 21:11, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
My changes
Who is Prince Magelang? Is he another name of Prince Diponegoro? I added {{contradict}} because the number of casualties in the infobox contradicts with the number in the texts. Peace. --Nielswik(talk) 05:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- re the contradiction tags, I've now reconciled the article and the info box - the problem now being that the ranges are unreferenced and so wide as to be essentially useless - we need some reliable sources. Merbabu 13:17, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Tarlby talk 16:56, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- ... that the outbreak of the Java War, which lasted five years and killed over 200,000 people, was triggered by a government road project? Source: Carey 2015, pp597-602
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Manchurian hare
- Comment: Proximate cause, anyway. 5,063 to 26,102 in character count.
Juxlos (talk) 01:27, 15 March 2025 (UTC).
The article is new enough, with a very large and well-sourced 5x expansion and no evidence of plagiarism. The hook is short enough and interesting. QPQ has been met. Alansohn (talk) 11:44, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Java War/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Juxlos (talk · contribs) 02:01, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Matarisvan (talk · contribs) 13:31, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi Juxlos, I am taking up this review. I will start with the image review, followed by the source review, then the prose review and finally the spot checks. Cheers Matarisvan (talk) 13:31, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- User:Matarisvan and User:Juxlos: What is the status of this review? It appears to have never started. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:11, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.





