This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user is aware of the designation of the following as contentious topics: the Arab–Israeli conflict the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups abortion complementary and alternative medicine post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles COVID-19 gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them pseudoscience and fringe science They should not be given alerts for those areas.

The Scrimbo Archives

Archive 1

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

fight me in chess... if you dare!!!! User:Tarlby/chess

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

This user supports the Wiki Workers United union of WMF staff. Sign the petition!

.

or check out my Guestbook if you want

Howdy Toby,

You recently rejected a draft article of mine. I would like to know where you found the sources to be unreliable or insufficient to improve it. Your help would be greatly appreciated.

I hope this message has found you well and that you may help me. I apologise in advance if it is inappropriate to ask questions here.

Cheers,

mooshrooms Mooshrooms (talk) 12:09, 7 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Mooshrooms. Here's an analysis of the sources:

1, 2, 4, 5, 9, 10 are all venues to download the game/related media or view basic information. There is no synthesis from secondary sources that prove why the game is notable.

3 is unreliable (see WP:VG/UNREL)

6 is a primary source and does not prove why the game is notable

8 seems unreliable. The author is attributed with their first name only and there is no editorial policy or staff page

Even if 7 is reliable, one working source is not enough. You can see WP:VGRS for sources you should and shouldn't use for video game articles. toby ^(t)(c)(rw) 18:27, 7 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

I have updated the article with more reliable sources and removed the more questionable sources. I'm not sure if I should resubmit it or ask you? Nonetheless, I'd really appreciated if you took a look again at my sources. I apologise if I'm not supposed to ask this here.

Cheers Mooshrooms (talk) 09:42, 8 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add one or two more sources? The reliable ones listed in WP:VGRS are especially needed. Eurogamer and 148apps look good. You can submit your draft at anytime. toby ^(t)(c)(rw) 15:26, 8 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there,

Just wanted to thank you for all your help and guidance. Thanks.

Cheers, Mooshrooms (talk) 15:55, 10 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job. toby ^(t)(c)(rw) 17:41, 10 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for your successful edit to lighten up Ace's day! However, this is a user's talk page that intends to be fun and cool place, so please make joke edits, as you did to User:Ace.still.life. Readers looking for accurate information will not find anything there because it's a goober's userpage. User is suspected of being incredibly cool, administrators should give user an infinite supply of kittens and should appoint user to the highest level of administration there is along with User:Ace.still.life - Ace, a random autistic on the internet 12:58, 3 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Tarlby! The article you nominated, Rain World, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, David Fuchs (talk) via FACBot (talk) 23:06, 7 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully you don't mind me creating a talk page section to say congratu-freaking-lations on the promotion of Rain World! It's such a well-written, well-sourced, well-organized, and well-presented article that I'm surprised you've never brought any other article to FAC or even GAN. For your first venture, it is amazing. Great job!!! nub :) 00:24, 8 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Nub098765, it means a lot.

Ironically, I honestly dislike the process of content creation, which probably explains my lack of GAs and authored articles. It just feels like a slog for me to parse through sources and organize them into an article... which I think makes it even more special for me that I took the time to work on this particular article since February 2024. It took a lot of time and a lot of opinions from people more experienced than me. I don't think I could have done it without the amazing foundation the author @Czar made and left back in 2017. There were a lot of breaks in-between, but I'm still proud of myself. Thank you! Now I just have to think about what other article I can work on for the next two years. toby ^(t)(c)(rw) 00:35, 8 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I can relate. Unless I'm really dedicated to a topic, I'm terrible at looking through sources. My attention enters a void from which I cannot pull it. 3 of my 6 total GANs have been improvements on foundations. Hopefully the article Fortnite Battle Royale can follow the same pipeline Rain World has with you. I wish you luck on Omori, a game which I have never played but which countless people have recommended to me. Perhaps I should play it. Anyway, again, nice job! nub :) 01:06, 8 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Playing Omori was an unforgettable experience for me. I implore you to play it.

And good luck with your work on Fortnite! toby ^(t)(c)(rw) 01:30, 8 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I just might!

And thank you!

Have a nice day :) nub :) 03:28, 8 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Toby! You deserved it. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 13:17, 8 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on getting Rain World to FA! It's one of my favorite games, so it's great to see someone putting so much time and effort into giving it the attention it deserves! Gasmasque (talk) 23:00, 8 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. And yeah, it absolutely deserves the attention! toby ^(t)(c)(rw) 01:03, 9 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:56, 18 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I am contacting you because you previously voted in elections related to the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C). You may be eligible to vote in the current U4C election, which is open now and closes on 2 June 2026. You can find out more about the candidates and the election on the election page on Meta, and from there you can access the vote itself. Your participation in these elections is important to the governance of Wikimedia communities, and your time spent learning about the candidates and voting is appreciated.

-- In cooperation with the U4C, Keegan (WMF) (talk)

Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:35, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User talk:TheWikiToby and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

(This message was sent to User talk:TheWikiToby and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Draft:Deputy Chief minister of Assam லடாக்மாநிலம் (talk) 16:51, 22 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The reasons are in the decline notice. toby ^(t)(c)(rw) 17:39, 22 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Although a template for Drake's songs already exists, there is no room for Habibti or Maid of Honour, alongside all of Drake's featured songs, as list templates like these can only fit 20 sections. Therefore, I fit every song in less sections, giving my version a much different design. Vloggakid (talk) 02:30, 23 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Vloggakid Sorry, forgot to respond to this. Since the template exists, is there no reason for you to edit it yourself? toby ^(t)(c)(rw) 19:55, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the source, although there are supposed to be additional sections to the original template, they do not appear, as they exceed the limit of 20 sections. Unless there is a glitch, or a patch that extends the limit, this is not possible, at least, I do not think so. Vloggakid (talk) 12:53, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Weird. Though still, I don't believe submitting a template to AfC is the right way to go about it, as it is still better to update the existing template. You can ask for help on the template then. toby ^{in solidarity} 15:42, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive: Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process? On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed. Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points! Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

the word toby is meant to be in comic sans, but for me, it shows… times new roman? i had the same issue with men kissing. [1] is proof. AltoHampton t • c • g • s 00:03, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

That's weird. It displays as comic sans to me. Idk how I would fix that. toby ^(t)(c)(rw) 03:13, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

regardin’ ur gb, i added it to the list. btw, i thought u already had one. alexa (seen above) also thought the same thing. AltoHampton t • c • g • s 04:48, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tarlby and congratulations on getting Rain World to FA status! I was wondering whether you may be interested in reviewing the article Well-being at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Well-being/archive1 since the article hasn't received enough reviews so far. Thank you for taking a look and please feel under no obligation if now is not a good time. Phlsph7 (talk) 08:43, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Phlsph7, and thanks. I might help out eventually (it's close to the end of exam season!), but I generally avoid topics that are broad and significant like Well-being. I'll keep this in mind though and check it out later. toby ^{in solidarity} 23:54, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ah alright, let's see if it works out. Good luck for your exams. Phlsph7 (talk) 07:45, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Tarlby ... in the Teahouse (I think it was there), you recently posted something about a guest book, but now I can't find it. At the time I noticed it, I was focused elsewhere and so I planned to come back to it.

I remember one thing about it, though, that I must share with you. Somewhere in that post of yours I was startled — but in a delightful way — to see my name mentioned in connection with some sort of inspiration you mentioned. It couldn't have come at a more perfect time because a few days earlier in the Teahouse I'd had a rare skirmish with another editor after I'd responded to a message he or she had posted with what turned out to be slightly misplaced humor, as you may have seen. I apologized and I think everything's fine now, but it was a bit painful for both the other editor, apparently, and me. So your cheery little note buried in your message was just the right medicine for me! Augnablik (talk) 05:18, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Augnablik! Yes, I accidentally pinged you when creating my WP:GUESTBOOK which you can see here. I included on that page various little thoughts I've written overtime on my user page, and one of them is in reference to you!

And I am glad to have improved your mood with that. I hope you have a great day :) Happy editing! toby ^{in solidarity} 17:17, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if your ping wasn't intended but it brought about a delightfully recuperative result, I'd like to nominate it for a perfect example, although in a secular setting, of the Christian saying, "O happy fault!";)

So I see by your signature these days that you're back to Toby. Should we expect regular changes of user names, then? I guess it's one good way of keeping us mentally in shape.

When I went to sign your guestbook, I noticed the directions were for those who use the Source editor. I'm in the minority of editors who prefer the Visual editor. I can deal with having to use the Source editor from time to time, though with gritted teeth, but just thought to squawk a little. Since joining Wikipedia and immediately gravitating to the VE, but finding myself in a definite minority among editors, I've increasingly gained sympathy for left-handers. I'm sure that with your own appreciation for humor, you can see what I was trying to say. But by the time you read this, I'll probably have succeeded in signing. Augnablik (talk) 11:02, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I like that proverb!

I have various usernames across multiple social media sites, including Tarlby, Croissant, Toby, and Toe Beans (did you get the joke for the last one?). Out of the four, I think Toby is simply the best one. It's personal, friendly, and not too confusing like Tarlby. For the foreseeable future, I intend to keep it, because I like it :)

And yes, I did get the joke. I used to always use Visual Editor when I was a newer editor, but I've slowly been using the source editor more and more as time goes on. Thank you for signing the Guestbook! toby ^{in solidarity} 20:38, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Toby is a nice name, though I rather liked Tarlby too.

Toby or not to be? Augnablik (talk) 04:15, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2026).

Administrator changes

• Asukite
• Bobby Cohn
• Bonadea
• Ca
• Drm310
• Reconrabbit
• Sammi Brie

• Tamzin
• TonyBallioni

• Ezhiki
• Queen of Hearts

Bureaucrat changes

• WereSpielChequers

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, the "persistent usage of large language models" has been included as a common reason for a block.

Technical news

• Mandatory 2FA for bureaucrats: Bureaucrats without two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled have already lost access to their advanced rights on 26 May. Those who do not enable 2FA may be automatically removed from the groups in mid-June 2026, and from that point onward, new members must have 2FA enabled before they can be added. (T423119, T423120)

Arbitration

• The arbitration case SchroCat has been closed.
• The arbitration case Michael Jackson has opened. Evidence submissions in this case closes on 1 June.

Miscellaneous

• Voting for the 2026 Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election closes on 1 June.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:03, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, can we be friends with you? ~2026-33106-46 (talk) 00:11, 6 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thanks for reviewing Baby Shaker. If it interests you, I also nominated Ahmed Al-Kaf and Favre-Leuba for GA status last year. Again, it's your choice, and I respect that! :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 07:57, 6 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! I don't usually review anything that is not VG related, but I might check them out eventually. toby ^{in solidarity} 06:57, 7 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Balatro has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Jon698 (talk) 09:19, 7 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]