This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gamergate article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Start a new topic Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find video game sources: "Gamergate" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Archives (index): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62Auto-archiving period: 30 days

view · edit Frequently asked questions To view an answer, click the [show] link to the right of the question. Q1: Can I use a particular article as a source? A1: What sources can be used in Wikipedia is governed by our reliable sources guideline, which requires "published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy". If you have a question about whether or not a particular source meets this policy, a good place to ask is the Reliable sources noticeboard. Q2: I found a YouTube video, a post on 4chan/Reddit/9GAG/8chan, or a blog that relates to Gamergate. Can I use it as a source in the article? A2: All sources used in the article must comply with Wikipedia's standards for reliable sources. Self-published sources cannot be used for biographical content on a living person. If such sources were used, then gossip, slander and libelous material may find its way into the article, which would a) tarnish the quality of Wikipedia's information and b) potentially open up Wikipedia to legal action. For further information, please read the guidelines for sources in biographies of living people. Q3: Why is Wikipedia preventing me from editing the article or talk page? Why is this article biased towards one party or the other? A3: Content on Wikipedia is required to maintain a neutral point of view as much as possible, and is based on information from reliable sources (Vox, The Wall Street Journal, etc.). The article and its talk page are under protection due to constant edit warring and addition of unsourced or unreliably sourced information prohibited by our policy on biographical content concerning living people (see WP:BLP). Q4: The "reliable sources" don't tell the full story. Why can't we use other sources? A4: Verifiability in reliable sources governs what we write. Wikipedia documents what the reliable sources say. If those sources are incorrect or inadequate, it is up to other reliable sources to correct this. Wikipedia's role is not to correct the mistakes of the world; it is to write an encyclopedia based on reliable, verifiable sources. In addition, this article falls under concerns relating to content on living persons. Sources that go into unverified or unsupported claims about living persons cannot be included at all. Editors should review the talk page archives here before suggesting a new source from non-mainstream sources to make sure that it hasn't been discussed previously. Q5: Why is it described as a “harassment campaign”? It wasn’t! At the very least the title shouldn’t use biased derogatory terminology! A5: The overwhelming consensus among reliable sources (see Q4) is that Gamergate was a harassment campaign. Describing it any other way would be unfairly biased towards its supporters.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: Speedy keep, 23 November 2015, see discussion. Keep, 6 September 2014, see discussion.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Video games Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks: Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks view watch edit history shell vg talk alerts purge AfDs Innersloth (2 participants) Sport Vii (1 participant) Spyro: A Realm Beyond (11 participants) List of controversies involving Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (6 participants) Maschinen-Mensch (2 participants) List of works with different titles in the United Kingdom and United States (5 participants) Paquito (Mobile Legends: Bang Bang) (8 participants) Map seed (2 participants) Fortnite: Chapter 2 Season 2 (9 participants) Gimkit (3 participants) VolleyBall (8 participants; relisted) Takane Ōkubo (2 participants; relisted) List of Fate/Grand Order characters (14 participants; relisted) Merge discussions Other discussions No major discussions Featured content candidates List of JoJo's Bizarre Adventure video games (nom) Transfer Pak (nom) Tomodachi Collection (nom) Good article nominations Fae Farm (nom) Talking Flower (nom) Kirby Air Riders (nom) Machines (Horizon) (nom) Fate/Stay Night (start) Fate/Hollow Ataraxia (nom) Zenyatta (Overwatch) (nom) Fate/Unlimited Codes (start) Mario & Luigi (nom) Luna Snow (start) Puppet Motel (nom) An Elder Scrolls Legend: Battlespire (nom) Tamagotchi Plaza (start) Tamagotchi Connection: Corner Shop 3 (start) Crypt Custodian (nom) Nod-Krai (nom) Everhood (nom) Fire Emblem Heroes (start) DYK nominations Volition (company) First Light (song) Reviews and reassessments Characters of Final Fantasy VIII (nom) Space Invaders Infinity Gene (rev) Myst (series) (nom) Articles that need... assessment (48) (64) reassessment (0) cleanup (24) infoboxes (13) cover art (474) screenshots (10,081) photos (87) translation from japan (168) creation merging Feminism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Journalism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Internet culture High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Internet culture To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article from here or here Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are located here Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}} See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention Sociology: Social Movements Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the social movements task force. 2010s This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s Discrimination Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. Women's History Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Men's Issues (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Men's Issues, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Men's IssuesWikipedia:WikiProject Men's IssuesTemplate:WikiProject Men's IssuesMen's Issues Gender studies Mid‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. It is requested that a picture or pictures be included in this article to improve its quality. To-do list: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles Cleanup : edit to see Collaborate : see /Collaboration Copyedit : edit to see Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender Expand : edit to see Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes Merge : edit to see Notability : edit to see NPOV : edit to see Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies Split : History of feminism Stubs : see Gender studies stubs Translate : see /translation Update : edit to see Verify : Riot grrrl Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention Human rights Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Occupational Safety and Health Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Women's Health Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women's health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. Sexology and sexuality Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Conservatism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations: Alex Hern (January 23, 2015). "Wikipedia votes to ban some editors from gender-related articles". The Guardian. Sarah Jeong (December 14, 2016). "If we took 'Gamergate' harassment seriously, 'Pizzagate' might never have happened". The Washington Post. David Auerbach (February 5, 2015). "The Wikipedia Ouroboros". Slate. Dabitch (February 5, 2015). "Wikipedia: the perpetual motion native ad machine". Adland. Lauren C. Williams (January 26, 2015). "Wikipedia Wants To Ban Feminists From Editing GamerGate Articles (Updated)". ThinkProgress. Archived from the original on September 29, 2018. Daniel Greenfield (August 20, 2016). "Gawker Editor: Gamergate Was Our Most Effective Enemy". FrontPage Magazine.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link) Sam Wineburg and Nadav Ziv (October 17, 2024). "Go ahead and use Wikipedia for research". The Boston Globe. Retrieved October 18, 2024. "Grokipedia vs. Wikipedia: See how Elon Musk's encyclopedia describes 5 hot-button topics". Business Insider. October 29, 2025. Retrieved October 29, 2025. Larry Sanger (17 May 2026). "What happened to Wikipedia's neutrality?". Washington Examiner. Retrieved 17 May 2026.

Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below. Copied Draft:Gamergate controversy (oldid, history) → Gamergate controversy (diff) Copied Draft:Gamergate controversy (oldid, history) → Gamergate controversy (diff)

Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them. The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article: This page is protected. You must be logged-in to an extended confirmed account (granted automatically to accounts with 500 edits and an age of 30 days) You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours (except in limited circumstances) Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator.

Do not feed the trolls! This article or its talk page has experienced trolling. The subject may be controversial or otherwise objectionable, but it is important to keep discussion on a high level. Do not get bogged down in endless debates that don't lead anywhere. Know when to deny recognition and refer to WP:PSCI, WP:FALSEBALANCE, WP:WIKIVOICE, or relevant noticeboards. Legal threats and trolling are never allowed!

The purpose of this talk page is to host ongoing discussion among interested editors regarding the Gamergate article itself. This page is not for discussing this talk page itself or any other meta-discussion; use the Talk:Gamergate/Meta subpage for that. The subpage's creation is an Arbitration Enforcement action. Info on changes to the reference list are here: Talk:Gamergate/Reference Info.

This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination. Logs and discussions Move logs: Gamergate Gamergate ant Gamergate controversy Gamergate (harassment campaign) Gamergate (disambiguation) Discussions Not moved, 12 November 2014, from Gamergate controversy to Gamergate, see discussion. Not moved, 14 February 2015, from Gamergate controversy to Gamergate movement, see discussion. Not moved, 15 May 2015, from Gamergate controversy to Gamergate harassment campaign, see discussion. Withdrawn, 30 August 2015, from Gamergate controversy to Gamergate, see discussion. POINT close, 19 September 2015, from Gamergate controversy to Gamergate (sexist terrorism), see discussion. Moved, 12 August 2021, from Gamergate controversy to Gamergate (harassment campaign), see discussion. Not moved, 20 August 2021, from Gamergate (harassment campaign), see discussion. Moved, 14 June 2025, from Gamergate (harassment campaign), see discussion.

Draft:Gamergate controversy was nominated for deletion on 23 June 2017. The result of the discussion was redirect.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: October 19 to 25, 2014 (19th)

Section sizes Section size for Gamergate (30 sections) Section name Byte count Prose size (words) Header Total Header Total (Top) 7,667 7,667 350 350 History 12 24,220 0 1,987 Zoë Quinn and Depression Quest 8,703 8,703 614 614 Anita Sarkeesian and Tropes vs. Women in Video Games 4,077 4,077 414 414 Brianna Wu 2,160 2,160 189 189 Other targets of harassment 4,767 4,767 346 346 Coordination of harassment 4,501 4,501 424 424 Demographics 1,724 1,724 234 234 Organization 6,284 14,991 567 1,587 Harassment and Twitter 2,633 2,633 346 346 Efforts to affect public perceptions 3,438 3,438 388 388 Targeting advertisers 1,100 1,100 140 140 Sad Puppies 1,536 1,536 146 146 Purpose and goals 8,979 8,979 1,005 1,005 Social, cultural, and political impact 3,089 20,665 348 2,460 Gamer identity 6,395 6,395 718 718 Misogyny and sexism 6,305 6,305 767 767 Law enforcement 4,876 4,876 627 627 Gaming industry response 6,906 6,906 798 798 Representation in media 3,227 3,227 208 208 Reducing online harassment 2,403 2,403 309 309 Legacy 10,981 36,033 606 2,233 2015–2018 5,229 5,229 318 318 2019 4,617 4,617 319 319 2020–2021 4,073 4,073 332 332 2022–present 11,133 11,133 658 658 See also 338 338 0 0 Notes 24 24 0 0 References 111,333 111,333 0 0 External links 1,149 1,149 0 0 Total 239,659 239,659 11,171 11,171

The following are reference ideas for Gamergate. Click [show] for details. The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future: Beyer, Jessica L. (2021). "Trolls and Hacktivists: Political Mobilization from Online Communities". In Rohlinger, Deana A.; Sobieraj, Sarah (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Digital Media Sociology. Oxford University Press. pp. 417–442. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197510636.013.47. ISBN 978-0-19-751063-6. Condis, Megan (2018). "From #GamerGate to Donald Trump: Toxic Masculinity and the Politics of the Alt-Right". Gaming Masculinity: Trolls, Fake Geeks, and the Gendered Battle for Online Culture. University of Iowa Press. pp. 95–106. ISBN 978-1-6093-8566-8. JSTOR j.ctv3dnq9f.12. Dewey, Caitlin (2016-02-17). "In the battle of Internet mobs vs. the law, the Internet mobs have won". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2023-07-10. Retrieved 2024-01-22. Donovan, Joan; Dreyfuss, Emily; Friedberg, Brian (2022). Meme Wars: The Untold Story of the Online Battles Upending Democracy in America. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-63-557864-5. Jones, Bethan (2018). "#AskELJames, Ghostbusters, and #Gamergate: Digital Dislike and Damage Control" (PDF). In Booth, Paul (ed.). A Companion to Media Fandom and Fan Studies. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 415–429. doi:10.1002/9781119237211.ch26. ISBN 978-1-1192-3716-7 – via The Wikipedia Library. {{cite book}}: Wikipedia Library link in |chapter-url= (help) Kidd, Dustin (2018). "GamerGate: Gender Perspectives on Social Media". Social Media Freaks: Digital Identity in the Network Society. New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-4299-7691-9. O'Donnell, Jessica (2022). "Changes Following Gamergate". Gamergate and Anti-Feminism in the Digital Age. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 179–222. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-14057-0_6. ISBN 978-3-031-14057-0 – via The Wikipedia Library. {{cite book}}: Wikipedia Library link in |chapter-url= (help) O'Donnell, Jessica (2022). "Gamers and Gamergate". Gamergate and Anti-Feminism in the Digital Age. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 63–107. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-14057-0_3. ISBN 978-3-031-14057-0 – via The Wikipedia Library. {{cite book}}: Wikipedia Library link in |chapter-url= (help) Reyman, Jessica; Sparby, Erika, eds. (2020). Digital Ethics: Rhetoric and Responsibility in Online Aggression. Routledge Studies in Rhetoric and Communication (1st ed.). New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780429266140. ISBN 978-0-367-21795-2. S2CID 189982687. Ruffino, Paolo (2018). "GamerGate: Becoming Parasites to Gaming". Future Gaming: Creative Interventions in Video Game Culture. London: Goldsmiths Press. pp. 104–119. ISBN 978-1-90-689755-0. Salter, Michael (2018). "From Geek Masculinity to Gamergate: The Technological Rationality of Online Abuse". Crime, Media, Culture. 14 (2): 247–264. doi:10.1177/1741659017690893. ISSN 1741-6604. Veale, Kevin (2020). "Introduction: The Breadth of Harassment Culture and Contextualising Gamergate" (PDF). Gaming the Dynamics of Online Harassment. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 1–33. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-60410-3_1. ISBN 978-3-030-60410-3 – via The Wikipedia Library. {{cite book}}: Wikipedia Library link in |chapter-url= (help) Wilson, Katie (2018). "Red Pillers, Sad Puppies, and Gamergaters" (PDF). In Booth, Paul (ed.). A Companion to Media Fandom and Fan Studies. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 431–445. doi:10.1002/9781119237211.ch27. ISBN 978-1-119-23721-1 – via The Wikipedia Library. {{cite book}}: Wikipedia Library link in |chapter-url= (help) Zuckerberg, Donna (2018). Not All Dead White Men: Classics and Misogyny in the Digital Age. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-6749-8982-5.

This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived.

All articles related to the Gamergate controversy are subject to discretionary sanctions.

Requests for enforcing sanctions may be made at: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by TheRedPenOfDoom (talk • contribs) 21:18, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2025 July § Gamergate. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 14:14, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

About the citations in the lead section, should we consider moving them to the body of the article as per WP:CITELEAD? sjones23 (talk - contributions) 08:14, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No. There is a reason that some articles have citations in the lead, and they are useful here. Johnuniq (talk) 08:27, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

While some articles (even GAs and FAs) don't need citations in the lead if they're already sourced in the body, I can agree we should keep the citations in the lead in this instance.

On a side note, I'll fix up the ref name number issues where necessary. sjones23 (talk - contributions) 08:52, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The last sentence of the lede's first paragraph says: "Gamergate targeted women in the video game industry, most notably feminist media critic Anita Sarkeesian and video game developers Zoë Quinn and Brianna Wu." On Zoe Quinn's page it says they're nonbinary, so I feel like the sentence could use some rewording. x RozuRozu • ^tea_cups 06:38, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'm no expert here, but could we add a note that says something like "At the time, Quinn identified as a woman" or "used they/she pronouns"? Woodroar (talk) 23:43, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Considering how debated this topic is, I'm not gonna add it myself, but this article seems like a nice reflection on what gamergate was. It's written by a woman fwiw. PizzaMan ♨♨♨ 12:18, 24 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Considering it's basically "It wasn't about harassment, it was about corruption in games journalism: The article" I wouldn't say it's 'nice' at all. ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ (talk) 12:36, 24 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Not to mention it misgenders Quinn within its first few paragraphs; I'd question the reliability of the "research" from its author. nil ^nz 12:51, 24 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

That website is not generally considered credible. They steal stories from other outlets and claim they're "exclusives", post rumors as fact, and sometimes flat-out make things up. Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 04:14, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]