DOKUMEN123.COM

of Wikipedia, but it is often needed most in these. Shortcuts WP:PSCIWP:PSCI WP:PSEUDOSCIENCEWP:PSEUDOSCIENCE WP:FRINGESUBJECTSWP:FRINGESUBJECTS Pseudoscientific...

Subliminal stimuli - Includes some pseudoscience but no mention of such for WP:PSCI Illusion - Currently listed at article for improvement (WP:TAFI) Objections...

User:PaleoNeonate/Userboxes/WikiProphet The WikiBible The Wikipedian's prayer WikiPrayer WP:PSCI Editing under the influence has been loathed in disdain by most scholars...

Course name PSCI 244 Voting, Voice, and Virtual Freedom Institution Illinois Wesleyan University Instructor Jim Simeone Wikipedia Expert Ian (Wiki Ed)...

version of this was posted here[1] Demarcation problem WP:FRINGE and WP:PSCI, policy in relation to fringe and pseudoscientific topics WP:FTN, the fringe...

using the resources listed at WP:SKEPTIC: Familiarize yourself with WP:PSCI, WP:FRINGE, WP:ARBPS, WP:CITE, WP:PARITY, WP:LEAD, WP:BRD (and WP:CONSENSUS)...

00:00:00 UTC – 2025-05-10 23:59:59 UTC Approximate number of student editors 15 PSCI 4270 Global Environmental Politics examines modern environmental issues and...

using the resources listed at WP:SKEPTIC: Familiarize yourself with WP:PSCI, WP:FRINGE, WP:ARBPS, WP:CITE, WP:PARITY, WP:LEAD, WP:BRD (and WP:CONSENSUS)...

dictionaries or books on special topics. Article also violates WP:FRINGE and WP:PSCI. Venkat TL (talk) 06:19, 28 October 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

on fringe theory (pseudoscience). Article also violates WP:FRINGE and WP:PSCI. Article makes claims about human nature and physiology violating WP:MEDRS...

also have trouble finding mentions in my pseudoscience books to meet WP:PSCI... —PaleoNeonate – 11:43, 2 January 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

On a side note, if this is somehow kept, it needs serious cleanup per WP:PSCI. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 13:37, 29 March 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

on fringe theory (pseudoscience). Article also violates WP:FRINGE and WP:PSCI. The creator is blocked for multiple copyright violations. Venkat TL (talk)...

movie events. The article as it stands is WP:COATRACK and violates the WP:PSCI policy. This movie did not get nearly as much press as say Vaxxed which had...

citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." WP:PSCI, a summary of Wikipedia's policies on neutrality, fringe theories, and pseudoscience...

dictionaries or books on special topics. Article also violates WP:NFRINGE and WP:PSCI. Only those aspects with coverage outside the astrology sources are notable...

find were blogs for new mothers, which seemed to be full of a lot of WP:PSCI. This article needs several WP:MEDRS, but GoogleScholar turned up nothing...

on fringe theory (pseudoscience). Article also violates WP:FRINGE and WP:PSCI. Venkat TL (talk) 09:56, 4 November 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

mention in Hindu_astrology#Texts. Article also violates WP:FRINGE and WP:PSCI. The creator is blocked after multiple copyright violations. See [1] Wikipedia:Contributor...

are outlined below. This case is the source for the original wording of WP:PSCI, as well as clarifying the differences that the Neutral point of view policy...

Subliminal stimuli - Includes some pseudoscience but no mention of such for WP:PSCI Illusion - Currently listed at article for improvement (WP:TAFI) Objections...

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience#Obvious pseudoscience WP:PSCI "Science and Pseudo-Science (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)". plato...

Institution Xavier University of Louisiana Instructor Mosterbur Subject AADS & PSCI Course dates 2015-08-24 – 2015-12-02 Approximate number of student editors...

WP:PSCI so that the coverage does not convey acceptance by the scientific community in science behind astrology. For example, as noted at WP:PSCI, the...

dictionary. Given sources are books on WP:FRINGE theory (pseudoscience WP:PSCI). Article makes claims about human nature violating WP:MEDRS Venkat TL (talk)...

December 2011 (UTC) Delete - this is essentially pure pseudo-science (WP:PSCI) and original research (WP:OR). Wikipedia must not be used as a platform...

club her very dodgy book. If for some reason this entry survives per WP:PSCI the dangerous woo[1] involved here really needs to be teased out. Alexbrn...

(UTC) Delete As the nom says it's a WP:POVFORK. A blatant one violating WP:PSCI to the max. Alexbrn talk|contribs|COI 15:35, 6 August 2014 (UTC) Merge and...

with fringe subjects and is also appropriate per WP:BLPSPS. Both BLP and WP:PSCI policies are at play here, so editors need to take care in upholding both...

sufficient coverage of PSCI/FRINGE, which were relevant issues, but the debate wound up resting on the question of whether PSCI was relevant, with most...

logs | views) Famousdog 12:21, 14 June 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:UNDUE and WP:PSCI - Because ... "If a viewpoint is held by an extremely small (or vastly limited)...

principle in the Pseudoscience Arb case were incorporated into NPOV (see: WP:PSCI), and are now being disregarded. Basically, some editors want to characterize...

fringe advocacy outside of their field of expertise (see WP:PROFRINGE, WP:PSCI, WP:BLP § Balance). There are people who are notable enough to have articles...

theory is WP:PSCI, and any Wikipedia article that would feature it would immediately have to contend with issues of WP:UNDUE and WP:PSCI. That Springer...

movie events. The article as it stands is WP:COATRACK and violates the WP:PSCI policy. This movie did not get nearly as much press as say Vaxxed which had...

a dictionary. Given source is book on WP:FRINGE theory (pseudoscience WP:PSCI). Venkat TL (talk) 07:32, 6 November 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

I have also looked at Wikipedia:Fringe theories and Wikipedia:PSCI#Pseudoscience_and_related_fringe_theories and Wikipedia:Verifiability#Questionable_sources...

issues are at the intersection of WP:BLP and WP:PSCI (conspiracy theories are generally in the realm of PSCI and fringe, and the intersection is discussed...

refuting sound science fact that disproves the psci. If for some reason there's many parts of the psci then there it would make sense to present one facet...

to be. Best regards Rhanyeia♥♫ 18:34, 4 February 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:PSCI. -- Levine2112 discuss 20:06, 4 February 2008 (UTC) Delete The immediately...

Amending media (books, films, etc) notability guidelines to accord with PSCI added 18 September 2017, archived 20 September 2017 A "not commentary" subsection...

means "without providing rationale or explanation". I have argued that WP:PSCI does not explicitly require that the word "pseudoscience" be used in every...

theory is WP:PSCI, and any Wikipedia article that would feature it would immediately have to contend with issues of WP:UNDUE and WP:PSCI. That Springer...

Our Time. New York: W.H. Freeman. ISBN 9780716730903 OCLC 36260669 See WP:PSCI, part of the core WP:NPOV policy. Ellsworth B. Cook, "Proposed Definition...

notability. Both Race and Intelligence and Race and IQ should be deleted WP:PSCI; WP:FRINGE; WP:NPOV; WP:UNDUE; not redirected and the content placed on Heritability...

is a TrueBeliever and much of his works will fall under the purview of WP:PSCI. [Placeholder for more stuff about David Crow] By scholar, I mean someone...

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: diff; fwiw, diff of notice of DS for PSCI Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Talk:Tatzelwurm#Cryptozoologists...

theory is WP:PSCI, and any Wikipedia article that would feature it would immediately have to contend with issues of WP:UNDUE and WP:PSCI. That Springer...

edit warring / 3RR warning: link (also notice of DS on altmed here and on PSCI here Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:...

theory is WP:PSCI, and any Wikipedia article that would feature it would immediately have to contend with issues of WP:UNDUE and WP:PSCI. That Springer...

"reducing their bias", speaking of the articles being biased for the WP:PSCI policy, i.e. these are WP:PROFRINGE edits. In 2022, both accounts have provided...

why User:SmithBlue has not been blocked under the PSCI DS yet for abuse of BLP to to POV-push PSCI and for WP:Civil POV-pushingWP:Civil POV pushing at...

draft is not written in a neutral way. If you can get the draft to meet WP:PSCI, then it should be ready for mainspace. Much of science is built on ideas...

Wikitext userbox where used {{User Political science expert}} PSCI This user is an expert in Political science. linked pages {{User:Jmjosh90/userbox/Political...

2014 (UTC) Difs by Nyytend: removes sourced content that was valid per WP:PSCI dif removing established, sourced content again remove sourced, to the point...

Ayurveda is undoubtedly a pseudoscience, the policies that apply are WP:PSCI, MOS:LEAD, MOS:BEGIN, WP:NPOV, WP:GEVAL, and WP:FRINGE – and the support...

while OMM is certainly fringe science, it is not pseudoscience under WP:PSCI -- it was founded by Linus Pauling and probably falls between questionable...

solution. Category:Pseudoscience should only be applied to a topic per WP:PSCI. That said, if there was some independent sources which categorize topics...

has singled out astrology as "generally considered pseudoscience" (see WP:PSCI), and has stated that such qualification is valid for such topics. Adding...

this to me, where they said " I don't even know what the PSCI is!" (in other words, what the PSCI issue is, in the Vaxxed article). And at that point I knew...

report below) The Master POINTY-ly removed well sourced info required by PSCI. This is disruptive edit warring and is blockable in my view. Jytdog (talk)...

after reversion by me diff, after reversion by me dif Diff of DS/alert for PSCI (anti-vax) diff Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: dif Diff of attempt to...

good intentions, he has a rather skewed interpretation of WP:FRINGE and WP:PSCI guidelines in that he believes those guidelines supersede policy. I imagine...

makes it seem like they are reacting to ....nothing. This is both BLP and PSCI violating editing as are pretty much all their edits about this movie and...

me and let me improve this" Diff of notice of Discretionary Sanctions on PSCI: diff (note their response to the DS alert) Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:...

think PSCI DS are very appropriate. Jytdog (talk) 11:56, 17 May 2016 (UTC) Not so ironic, but when I heard about DS, the first place I looked twas PSCI. It...

the next editor (me). The WP:OWN and continued POV pushing against the WP:PSCI policy is clear, as is the edit warring in this instance. Jytdog (talk) 15:57...

thought, maybe, if I restored it again, other editors would agree. So that is PSCI-pushing immediate background At the Samson article.... Please note that dif...

it. The purpose of this RfC needs to be clarified: it aims to demote WP:PSCI from policy to an ignorable guideline. Currently, WP:NPOV requires a neutral...

WP:PROMOTION issues in its current state (I removed an undue section with WP:PSCI, WP:FALSEBALANCE and MOS:QUOTE issues for now). —PaleoNeonate – 23:13, 10...

Wikipedia:Verifiability#Questionable sources, Wikipedia:Fringe theories, and Wikipedia:PSCI Organizations and individuals that express views that are widely acknowledged...

27 November 2008 (UTC) Please read my comment on the talk page. See WP:PSCI. QuackGuru 00:34, 27 November 2008 (UTC) The issue (to save work for people)...

Subliminal stimuli - Includes some pseudoscience but no mention of such for WP:PSCI Illusion - Currently listed at article for improvement (WP:TAFI) Objections...

sourced sections as unreferrenced[143], or removing hidden comments about WP:PSCI [144]. Please some admin warn him to take it way slowly. --Enric Naval (talk)...

behavior issues related to PSCI before or as part of protecting the page and telling everyone to get consensus since PSCI behavior issues tend to disrupt...

vegetarian diet contributed to her premature and painful death"). Per WP:PSCI I don't think Bon courage's edits are problematic. Black Kite (talk) 21:51...

impression is that EdChem points out that failure to follow WP:NPOV, WP:PSCI and WP:YESPOV is not new, rather than making criticism about a particular...

consensus. Personally denialism seems like the best label here, from WP:PSCI. Jerodlycett (talk) 03:23, 25 March 2015 (UTC) @Jerodlycett: You are trying...

applies to various pseudoscientific topics, for which we have the policy WP:PSCI, but many of the aforementioned artices don't really fit neatly into that...

article are: Neutral point of view: Fringe theories and pseudoscience (WP:PSCI) Neutral point of view: Due and undue weight (WP:UNDUE) Neutral point of...

refuting the attempt. The Watts BLP and WUWT blog article are subject to WP:PSCI, and the semantics issue between "denier", etc., and "skeptic" would seem...

material, improper context for a direct quote, original research, and WP:PSCI violation. This was added by a new editor. I explain the problem thoroughly...

or remedy, and an explanation how these edits violate it [56] Violates WP:PSCI through removing all or most WP:RS which discuss Steiner's pseudoscience...

"particular bias in their views when it comes to topics like astrology". See: WP:PSCI, WP:FRINGE and WP:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience. Are you sure you...

in WP:PSEUDOSCIENCE that we can't call it one. This is now policy in WP:PSCI. Both terms have similar demarcation problems. "Eco-terrorism" also has additional...

August 2009 (UTC) Floydian, you've been here enough years to know what WP:PSCI says. You've been here enough years to know that, for any subject, no matter...

(UTC) Support. per demonstrated lack of competence and violations of WP:PSCI, WP:BATTLEFIELD, and WP:CAMPAIGNING; not to mention WP:IDHT after having...

to established scholarship and the beliefs of the greater world." and WP:PSCI "scientific consensus is the majority viewpoint of scientists towards a topic...

unblockables, but shouldn't WP:HERE, WP:CONSENSUS, WP:RS, WP:NPOV (and WP:PSCI) be more important things to focus on, considering that they affect the encyclopedia's...

warring 24 November 2012 continues edit warring 24 November 2012 edited out PSCI content on homeopathy and placed POV tag 25 Nov 2012 edit warred to keep...

confidently place the fringe view in proper context per WP:NPOV, in particular WP:PSCI, a policy. I consider this to be the main reason for WP:FRIND. I gave additional...

starting to become clear that this whole situation is starting to resemble WP:PSCI. Our collective response seems like we're still in the early stages of grief...

change in orientation toward the policy issues that led to the indef (WP:PSCI) there is no reason to lift it.Jytdog (talk) 18:08, 20 July 2015 (UTC) Oppose...

to be more favorable to Sheldrake (if you ask me, they want to ignore WP:PSCI and other portions of WP:NPOV). If you cannot take the word of participating...

suing the EPA over regulation of glyphosate removed statement that per WP:PSCI gave the science-based reality where FRINGE claims are presented. dif adds...

from)" that conflicts with their work here as an editor. NPOV includes WP:PSCI with states that "when talking about pseudoscientific topics, we should not...

ape hypothesis of adding original research and content that violates WP:PSCI, WP:GEVAL, WP:FRINGE, and WP:SOAP. Typically the best way to handle this...

May 2008 (UTC) Some editors have expressed that the second paragraph of WP:PSCI (A section of the NPOV FAQs dealing with pseudoscience) may be confusing...

An (talk) 20:57, 20 April 2021 (UTC) Conservapedia fails WP:FRINGE and WP:PSCI, so we cannot treat it "fairly". Tgeorgescu (talk) 20:59, 20 April 2021 (UTC)...

has been categorised as pseudoscience, the article should conform to WP:PSCI policy including "The pseudoscientific view should be clearly described as...

violations, etc. when it appears she just isn't familiar the spirit of WP:PSCI policy in how we handle BLPs, or the related Arbcom decisions relating to...

seems to be that the edits in question do not fall within the mandate of the PSCI decision, because they concern the culture war rather than science. If that...

Wikipedia is wrong, starting with WP:LUNATICS, WP:GOODBIAS, WP:ARBPS, WP:PSCI, WP:UNDUE, WP:GEVAL, WP:FRINGE, and so on. So, insisting that they will be...

aware of them (see WP:AC/DS#Awareness and alerts) [49] Alerted to DS in PSCI by Bradv on September 7 Additional comments by editor filing complaint I...

cases I've seen, Blippy's warring is a push against policies such as WP:PSCI, WP:FRINGE, WP:GEVAL. Blippy is a time sink on editors who could be doing...

supported by sources" 04-19 adds fringe assertion as statement of fact (WP:PSCI: Any inclusion of pseudoscientific views should be proportionate with the...

looks like the claim has some grounding), that content was a violation of WP:PSCI and the principles of the the pseudoscience case. The DS need to be used...

September 19 Blocked for ignoring topic ban September 19 AE Topic Ban on PSCI, including Walter Russell If discretionary sanctions are requested, supply...

censor them. The "psychotronic" stuff is definitely PSCI and it is for people like this that the PSCI DS were created. Please do enact them. Jytdog (talk)...

to: WP:FRINGE, WP:MEDRS; WP:LUNATICS; WP:CHOPSY; WP:GOODBIAS; WP:DUE, WP:PSCI and WP:FALSEBALANCE; WP:ARBPS and WP:ARBCAM. So, this isn't a case against...

or obfuscating that scientists say there is a consensus conflict with WP:PSCI policy. We also have sources giving appropriate weight to these fringe views...

(UTC) The purpose of this RfC needs to be clarified: it aims to demote WP:PSCI from policy to an ignorable guideline. Currently, WP:NPOV requires a neutral...

similarly to climate change denial, anti-vaccine sentiment, etc.[13][14] Such WP:PSCI policy violations generally require a significant demonstrated change in...

dictionaries or books on special topics. Article also violates WP:NFRINGE and WP:PSCI. Only those aspects with coverage outside the astrology sources are notable...

between scientific consensus and a discredited method — WP:GEVAL and WP:PSCI are explicit about this. As for the video: a short clip of someone appearing...

astrology, etc.). For some time, there has been consensus on WP that WP:PSCI WP:FRINGE##Pseudoscience explicitly refers to the user of category:pseudoscience...

regular processes; but FRINGE is there for a very good reason (as is WP:PSCI, which is policy). Black Kite (talk) 17:02, 23 October 2021 (UTC) I agree...

like), and WP:policies and guidelines (including of course WP:BLP and WP:PSCI) First line in the article states: G. Edward Griffin (born November 7, 1931)...

covered. 65.88.88.93 (talk) 21:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC) You forget that WP:PSCI and WP:GEVAL are website policy. Sanger's way, which is basically a rejection...

life GEOG Geography PHRE Philosophy and religion ARTS Arts HIST History PSCI Physical sciences BIOG Biography MATH Mathematics SOCS Social sciences BIOH...

scientific context, what is the proper way to apply WP:PSCI? Put another way, is my understanding of PSCI, as explained here, accurate? — Rhododendrites talk...

back in 2007, and were topic banned under the PSCI arbcom DS by Guy in 2009; warned again about the PSCI DS in October 2015, and just recently moved the...

without the context of scientific consensus on the question is contrary to WP:PSCI. Pejoratives As I've observed in other discussions, the use of the word 'homosexual'...

- to "List of pseudosciences" and have the inclusion criteria mirror WP:PSCI; whereas, the resulting list article will have entries mirroring that of...

or significant criticism or controversies" in the lead. Secondly, the WP:PSCI policy obliges us to identify pseudoscientific view clearly. Alexbrn talk|contribs|COI...

category Category:Pseudoscience, where (according to an ARBCOM ruling: see WP:PSCI) we are allowed to categorize things as pseudoscience e.g. "Astrology is...

is not), then Quackwatch would not be a reliable source because - per WP:PSCI - in order for Wikipedia to declare something a pseudoscience, we must show...

undue weight in summary articles. However, it is disputed whether it is PSCI or FRINGE. Someone complained that it was impossible to write a balanced...

dictionary. Given sources are books on WP:FRINGE theory (pseudoscience WP:PSCI). Article makes claims about human nature violating WP:MEDRS Venkat TL (talk)...

with fringe subjects and is also appropriate per WP:BLPSPS. Both BLP and WP:PSCI policies are at play here, so editors need to take care in upholding both...

notability. Both Race and Intelligence and Race and IQ should be deleted WP:PSCI; WP:FRINGE; WP:NPOV; WP:UNDUE; not redirected and the content placed on Heritability...

example "what you say is WP:PSCI bogus. Awickert (talk) 18:21, 21 March 2009 (UTC)" This is implying that everything I say is WP:PSCI. Furthermore, even if...

ID falls into the "Generally considered pseudoscience" category in the WP:PSCI so there is not violation of the NPOV policy.--LexCorp (talk) 14:54, 31 December...

- to "List of pseudosciences" and have the inclusion criteria mirror WP:PSCI; whereas, the resulting list article will have entries mirroring that of...

scientific consensus on the science aspects, as required for due weight and WP:PSCI policy. . . dave souza, talk 11:56, 13 July 2010 (UTC) Disagree. We should...

WP:NPOV actually has a section about pseudoscience and other such nonsense (WP:PSCI) which indicates that pseudoscience and similar fringe beliefs should be...

on fringe theory (pseudoscience). Article also violates WP:FRINGE and WP:PSCI. Article makes claims about human nature and physiology violating WP:MEDRS...

find were blogs for new mothers, which seemed to be full of a lot of WP:PSCI. This article needs several WP:MEDRS, but GoogleScholar turned up nothing...

mention in Hindu_astrology#Texts. Article also violates WP:FRINGE and WP:PSCI. The creator is blocked after multiple copyright violations. See [3] Wikipedia:Contributor...

on fringe theory (pseudoscience). Article also violates WP:FRINGE and WP:PSCI. The creator is blocked for multiple copyright violations. Venkat TL (talk)...

also have trouble finding mentions in my pseudoscience books to meet WP:PSCI... —PaleoNeonate – 11:43, 2 January 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

think the time may have come to question whether we should perhaps change WP:PSCI and WP:RNPOV, or at least ask for community discussion of them, to deal with...

theories" (WP:PSCI) section of WP:NPOV has been moved to WP:FRINGE (a guideline), and was removed from NPOV (a policy) (see its April 30 version). PSCI has been...

theory lacking the necessary coverage which analyze it for us (to satisfy WP:PSCI and WP:PARITY). Maybe it's just WP:TOOSOON... —PaleoNeonate – 01:01, 21 September...

is a TrueBeliever and much of his works will fall under the purview of WP:PSCI. [Placeholder for more stuff about David Crow] By scholar, I mean someone...

December 2011 (UTC) Delete - this is essentially pure pseudo-science (WP:PSCI) and original research (WP:OR). Wikipedia must not be used as a platform...

(UTC) Delete As the nom says it's a WP:POVFORK. A blatant one violating WP:PSCI to the max. Alexbrn talk|contribs|COI 15:35, 6 August 2014 (UTC) Merge and...

theory lacking the necessary coverage which analyze it for us (to satisfy WP:PSCI and WP:PARITY). Maybe it's just WP:TOOSOON... —PaleoNeonate – 01:01, 21 September...

have a plethora of policies regarding pseudoscience, nicely summed up at WP:PSCI. Under no circumstances do we turn to amateur pages like cryptomundo.com...

WP:PROMOTION issues in its current state (I removed an undue section with WP:PSCI, WP:FALSEBALANCE and MOS:QUOTE issues for now). —PaleoNeonate – 23:13, 10...

(talk—WP:3IAR) 13:42, 20 February 2009 (UTC) Endorse I did not follow WP:PSCI from ArbCom to policy, but policy is the right place for it. - Eldereft (cont...

in a sustained way. On altmed topics yes there is promotion of quackery/PSCI; here, pro-vaping activists who don't want e-cigs regulated, some of them...

a dictionary. Given source is book on WP:FRINGE theory (pseudoscience WP:PSCI). Venkat TL (talk) 07:32, 6 November 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

On a side note, if this is somehow kept, it needs serious cleanup per WP:PSCI. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 13:37, 29 March 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

content such that sources would need to meet the standards outlined at WP:PSCI/WP:FRINGE. If the latter, well, there's basically nothing. The last AfD was...

intersection of WP:BLPSPS and WP:PSCI Jytdog (talk) 20:24, 7 October 2018 (UTC) RfC on the intersection of WP:BLPSPS and WP:PSCI restated Jytdog (talk) 15:36...

10:46, 24 September 2017 (UTC) Recommended readings: WP:ARBPS, WP:FRINGE, WP:PSCI, Talk:Global warming/FAQ. I'm not replying for Doug who is welcome to answer...

club her very dodgy book. If for some reason this entry survives per WP:PSCI the dangerous woo[3] involved here really needs to be teased out. Alexbrn...

without the context of scientific consensus on the question is contrary to WP:PSCI. Pejoratives As I've observed in other discussions, the use of the word 'homosexual'...

discuss 20:24, 13 August 2008 (UTC) Levine, don't confuse WP:PSCI with sourcing. WP:PSCI says nothing about "authoritative sources". ScienceApologist...

undue weight in summary articles. However, it is disputed whether it is PSCI or FRINGE. Someone complained that it was impossible to write a balanced...

(April 2014)/Course description Hood College/PSCI 305: American Foreign Policy (Spring 2014) Hood College/PSCI 305: American Foreign Policy (Spring 2014)/Course...

WP:NPOV. Specifically, you'll want to spend some time with the WP:GEVAL and WP:PSCI sections, both of which directly address the need to present the mainstream...

created a new course — PSCI 244 Voting, Voice, and Virtual Freedom — at dashboard.wikiedu.org/courses/Illinois_Wesleyan_University/PSCI_244_Voting,_Voice...

Wikipedia. I think Astrology reliable sources can be used in Wikipedia, see WP:PSCI, but the person using them has to (1) avoid bringing into Wikipedia the scientific...

logs | views) Famousdog 12:21, 14 June 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:UNDUE and WP:PSCI - Because ... "If a viewpoint is held by an extremely small (or vastly limited)...

notable for other things that then add in this type of fad diet or other PSCI concept to their resume, which gets covered in non-MEDRS reliable sources...

closed VPP discussion. What I said was not meant to contradict either WP:PSCI or WP:FRINGE, and it's important to be just as careful not to promote false...

write a an article on this that actually complies with WP:NPOV including WP:PSCI. You will not be able to. We do not create articles when we have insufficient...

write a an article on this that actually complies with WP:NPOV including WP:PSCI. You will not be able to. We do not create articles when we have insufficient...

sources that point this obvious fact out. Wikipedia needs to say so too per WP:PSCI. Fringe stuff must be clearly identified as such. Alexbrn (talk) 04:25, 29...

the cause might actually be this high tech conspiracy. It is against WP:PSCI; there are no reliable sources that say these technologies actually exist...

content such that sources would need to meet the standards outlined at WP:PSCI/WP:FRINGE. If the latter, well, there's basically nothing. The last AfD was...

scientific knowledge but a fringe view, we'd need to make that plain per WP:PSCI, perhaps by giving some actual facts from the FDA?[6]. Alexbrn (talk) 08:33...

WP:PSCI is also policy and there is no conflict between editing per PSCI with reliable sourcing and BLP. You might have an argument if content per PSCI and...

Wikipedia. I think Astrology reliable sources can be used in Wikipedia, see WP:PSCI, but the person using them has to (1) avoid bringing into Wikipedia the scientific...

data help? That info seems extraneous there anyhow. Given the rigors of WP:PSCI, we should instead be listing the critics who support that this concept is...

(edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) PSCI/alt med generally Joseph Mercola (edit | talk | history | protect | delete |...

consciousness, and it is only used for that purpose. Per WP:NPOV, specifically WP:PSCI, we are required to place views considered pseudoscientific in the context...

redundancy between this and various other essays and even policies like WP:PSCI and WP:FRINGE. It however agrees with the spirit and its shortcuts could...

seem to refute the notion that it's fringe (not part of the mainstream). WP:PSCI doesn't apply, because the topic is not being presented as science. Airborne...

examination of the pop sci sources is needed to see if they are presenting PSCI/FRINGE POC even if they are using the ame terms as the academic work. JbhTalk...

Wikipedia:Verifiability#Questionable sources, Wikipedia:Fringe theories, and Wikipedia:PSCI. I'm glad you guys put the hurt sensitive feeling and emotions aside for...

BLPs on proponents of fringe topics according to WP policies, notably WP:PSCI, gives rise to a "conflict of interest". I am starting to wonder if WP:CIR...

(talk - contribs) to en:Vicente Fox (diff). Links: www2.kenyon.edu/depts/PSci/Fac/klesner/Klesner_Institucionalizar_La_Nueva_Democracia_de_Mexico.pdf 72...

contributed saying “see talk”. His ‘talk’ stated: We have to adhere to WP:PSCI, which makes it clear that where science and pseudoscience are presented...

WP:GEVAL, and that any fringe views were loudly identified as such per WP:PSCI. Alexbrn (talk) 11:39, 6 December 2020 (UTC) Anyone is advised to take a...

contentious in a discretionary sanction topic), especially one familiar with WP:PSCI. Kingofaces43 (talk) 16:37, 30 March 2018 (UTC) {{done}} Sandstein 18:35...

Alexbrn (talk) 18:03, 22 April 2018 (UTC) Agreed. It’s a pretty blatant WP:PSCI policy violation, so it doesn’t look like there’s any reason to entertain...

Like ... "How Not to Die") These exaggerated claims are pretty much WP:PSCI (we are talking about the claims, not about him); there are of course some...

noticeboard discussion that I started to clarify issues at the intersection of PSCI and BLP, Guy (who was previously uninvolved in the article but became involved...

sources, and editors should be careful not to over-apply WP:FRINGE and WP:PSCI - I have seen this in multiple places. --Sammy1339 (talk) 17:19, 22 January...

specifically WP:PSCI, the basis of WP:FRINGE. Alexbrn (talk) 17:39, 23 April 2020 (UTC) You are misreading that policy, or at best, stretching it. WP:PSCI requires...

Mathewson Institution Hood College (Frederick, MD) Course title and description PSCI 305: American Foreign Policy. The course is an examination of how the foreign...

said. Sardaka is arguing directly counter to NPOV policy, specifically WP:PSCI and WP:GEVAL. Basically we call bullshit out for what it is. Alexbrn (talk)...

than trying to distill a summary answer: please see WP:WEIGHT, WP:VALID, WP:PSCI, Wikipedia:Fringe theories, Wikipedia:Scientific consensus and Wikipedia:Why...

engaged in HIV/AIDS denialism. My understanding of the intersection of BLP and PSCI is that WP should simply and directly provide the scientific consensus on...

protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Recent persistent removal of WP:PSCI material, I have to leave so additional watchlisters welcome. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate...

on the topic, here and elsewhere, is about the blog, not the person. WP:PSCI (part of NPOV) is certainly involved because the blog promotes a fringe view...

scientific accuracy and is often useful for WP:PARITY and to apply the WP:PSCI policy. —PaleoNeonate – 23:57, 8 August 2021 (UTC) From the original post...

(edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) PSCI/alt med generally Joseph Mercola (edit | talk | history | protect | delete |...

comment - I think Anarchist had it right in that WP:FRINGE guideline and WP:PSCI section of NPOV can and has and will be taken as a mandate that something...

allow just anything to be posted in line with the policy. Both BLP and WP:PSCI policies are at play here, so editors need to take care in upholding both...

course, that is not my own fault, but a result of WP:RULES such as WP:DUE, WP:PSCI, WP:FRINGE, and WP:MEDRS. We are at war with quacks, how comes that you did...

find relevant (and appropriate) criticism or commentary, in which case WP:PSCI, WP:FRINGE also apply. So not popular discussions, or publications aimed...

prominently include such information because the WP:NPOV policy (specifically WP:PSCI) dictates it. Manul ~ talk 22:45, 23 March 2015 (UTC) Again, what do the...

intersection of WP:BLPSPS and WP:PSCI Jytdog (talk) 20:24, 7 October 2018 (UTC) RfC on the intersection of WP:BLPSPS and WP:PSCI restated Jytdog (talk) 15:36...

List has become infected with a number of badly sourced claims, or claims flatly described as fact, e.g. "Guy Hottel investigated for the Air Force the...

Wikipedia aspires to be such a respected work. The four groupings found at WP:PSCI Obvious pseudoscience: Theories which, while purporting to be scientific...

intersection of WP:BLPSPS and WP:PSCI Jytdog (talk) 20:24, 7 October 2018 (UTC) RfC on the intersection of WP:BLPSPS and WP:PSCI restated Jytdog (talk) 15:37...

here, but in terms of original research it's pretty cut and dry under WP:PSCI and WP:FRINGE that this is assigning due weight to the view expressed by...

semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring against website policy, namely WP:PSCI. tgeorgescu (talk) 00:12, 18 February 2022 (UTC) Semi-protected for a period...

-> (overlap) Username overlaps with domain: 'spacini'-'psci.net' = 31.03% (55.71/55.71)Link: psci.net: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple...

Wikipedia_talk:Biographies_of_living_persons#The_intersection_of_BLPSPS_and_PSCI Jytdog (talk) 18:59, 28 July 2018 (UTC) Jeff Fager (edit | talk | history |...

There is not a "very narrow and limited scope" for WP:UNDUE / WP:VALID / WP:PSCI (part of the POLICY level document) and Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitrati...

the Declaration because it is not science, but fringe polemic. But per WP:PSCI we do need to point out that it's ridiculous. Alexbrn (talk) 11:19, 18 March...

(talk) 18:13, 24 January 2018 (UTC) The correct noticeboard for discussing WP:PSCI/WP:VALID in general is WP:FT/N, where Rolfing has already been aired a number...

self-published (WP:BLPSPS), when the opinion advocates fringe theories (WP:PSCI), or when basically no other sources talk about that particular opinion...

we don't need to quote sources, we can call things what they are per WP:PSCI, as long as the sources use "climate skeptic" or "climate realist", or that...

dismissed by the closer as direct violations of WP:FRINGE and especially WP:PSCI policy. Such comments have no place on Wikipedia and this RfC cannot be used...

about psychiatry or any other science-related topic for that matter. Per WP:PSCI, Scientology does not even remotely come close to representing the scientific...

Pyrrho the Skeptic (talk) 18:56, 12 July 2021 (UTC) Read WP:DUE and WP:PSCI. tgeorgescu (talk) 18:57, 12 July 2021 (UTC) tgeorgescu, read it yourself...

logs | views) This article may need more page watchers in relation to WP:PSCI observance. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 06:54, 2 January 2020 (UTC) I reverted...

Talk:KosherSwitch#NPOV --Guy Macon (talk) 08:18, 6 October 2018 (UTC) An RfC regarding PSCI and FRINGE (components of NPOV) has beeen started here[11]. Tornado chaser...

a creation science film suggest we may need an RfC to clarify whether WP:PSCI/WP:NFRINGE apply only to articles about fringe theories or also to works...

December 2016 (UTC) There is a confusion about the proper application of WP:PSCI and WP:FRINGE/PS that could use some clarifying at the discussion page. Is...

February 2018 (UTC) My only reply to Rhine: please read WP:ARBPS and WP:PSCI. —PaleoNeonate – 17:39, 4 February 2018 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia. -Roxy...

Wikipedia:Verifiability#Questionable sources, Wikipedia:Fringe theories, and Wikipedia:PSCI Organizations and individuals that express views that are widely acknowledged...

semi-protection Creationist IP removing sourced content, adding unsourced PSCI-violating content. Jytdog (talk) 19:13, 24 September 2018 (UTC) Semi-protected...

watch | logs) Temporary semi-protection IP address persistently reverting WP:PSCI-compliant information. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 03:28, 22 December 2017 (UTC)...

If not, what are we talking about? The argument for keeping it is that WP:PSCI requires that we keep it. It is written dispassionately and it's well cited...

com/photos/schools/ill/sports/m-footbl/auto_pdf/2004Guide-11.pdf http://www.psci.net/%7Edavidm/homepage4.htm This article already exists in Wikipedia. It...

(UTC) The basis for the statement would surely be WP:WEIGHT, specifically WP:PSCI and WP:GEVAL. The IPCC Fifth Assessment Report is currently the best overall...

halfway-sensible reader. Paul B (talk) 16:05, 8 June 2014 (UTC) I notice some WP:PSCI and WP:FRINGE violations since the push that started two weeks ago; compare...

that guide content here at Wikipedia. Please pay special attention to WP:PSCI. Good luck. I'll add a connected contributor tag to the article Talk page...

if/how to change BLP to resolve and alleged conflict between WP:BLPSPS and WP:PSCI. Tornado chaser (talk) 20:36, 31 July 2018 (UTC) LumaNatic is inserting "enslaver"...

other forms of relaxation or reassurance. About the advocacy claim, by WP:PSCI it must be clear when it's pseudoscientific, but I currently don't see it...

best creation science is using scientific methods..." and so forth. The WP:PSCI policy along with its explanatory guideline WP:FRINGE were designed to prevent...

dangerous/bogus is not NPOV. I will raise a query at WP:FT/N because there are WP:PSCI / WP:FRINGE issues here. Alexbrn (talk) 13:43, 17 October 2019 (UTC) Same...

inclusion). I think we all agree that in the arbcom ruling described at WP:PSCI homeopathy fits somewhere between astrology and psychoanalysis. In my opinion...

about content and sourcing at David Wolfe (entrepreneur), and both BLP and PSCI are relevant. The most recent content offered is: He advocates that people...

those in the guideline could conflict with established policies like WP:PSCI and WP:YESPOV. —PaleoNeonate – 02:16, 19 December 2020 (UTC) Those might...

The policy that particularly applies to colon cleansing can be found in WP:PSCI. This is a pseudoscientific/quack (and dangerous) practice according to the...

disconnect: the independent sources brought in for mainstream reception (WP:PSCI) may not match up with the editors' own summary. The independent sources...

Category:Pseudoscience. Essentially this Arbcom decision is policy as WP:PSCI. Cfd for Category:War criminals. CfD for Category:Terrorists. Note that "eco-terrorism"...

biographical subject matter (WP:BLP) and a policy that covers fringe views (WP:PSCI within WP:NPOV). The latter says we should include an "explanation of how...

and ARBCOMM directives, including WP:DUE, WP:GEVAL, WP:MNA, WP:FRINGE, WP:PSCI, WP:FRINGE/PS, WP:NOTRELIABLE & WP:ABOUTSELF. Stephfo needs to understand...

arguing that calling pseudoscience what it is disparages or patronizes, the WP:PSCI policy says that it must clearly be described as such. The reason why ID...

pseudoarchaeology in the article itself so may need some application of WP:PSCI... —PaleoNeonate – 18:34, 12 May 2021 (UTC) It's documented in his Books...

problematic claims. I'd need help on this one, not sure how to navigate between WP:PSCI and WP:BLP. KarlPoppery (talk) 18:26, 25 May 2017 (UTC) References http://www...

be like when describing climate change denial? Wikipedia has a policy WP:PSCI which says "While pseudoscience may in some cases be significant to an article...

"described as pseudoscientific" and "are pseudoscientific". According to WP:PSCI and WP:YESPOV I had the idea that it should be stated in the voice of Wikipedia...

lead is a summary of the article's body's important points (WP:LEAD). WP:PSCI/WP:FRINGE policy requires that pseudoscience be indicated as such. The body...

In point of fact, our fringe guidance is an elaboration of (at least) WP:PSCI and WP:GEVAL, which are intrinsic to WP:NPOV. Alexbrn (talk) 16:17, 8 June...

that you have no WP:CLUE about what WP:NPOV means. It means WP:DUE and WP:PSCI. In practice, this means that Wikipedia conservatively endorses the medical...

improving Wikipedia in relation to WP:FRINGE topics and observance of WP:PSCI. I don't know them and had no idea that they themselves participated in operations...

there. It is included to discredit Greger himself. This is a case of WP:PSCI being used as a bludgeon to enforce a particular point of view. --Sammy1339...

covers all non-mainstream ideas (as does the policy from which it derives, WP:PSCI). The GBD is political but - sure - has a science-y veneer. In that sense...

sourced scientific information in other articles as per WP:FRINGE and WP:PSCI. Editors can remove or challenge the addition of any SEGM based evidence...

scholars from Physics, Astronomy have endorsed his work? Please read WP:PSCI. Jytdog (talk) 06:01, 20 April 2017 (UTC) Maybe they did not endorse his...

and a minority point of view (per WP:NPV, WP:FALSEBALANCE, WP:WEIGHT, WP:PSCI); 3. Because the lead cannot be used to concisely summarize the nature of...

I have also looked at Wikipedia:Fringe theories and Wikipedia:PSCI#Pseudoscience_and_related_fringe_theories and Wikipedia:Verifiability#Questionable_sources...

pseudo like that is a major NPOV violation in addition to WP:FRINGE. WP:PSCI policy is explicit The pseudoscientific view should be clearly described...

claim—blindlynx 18:55, 11 January 2024 (UTC) Someone (a newbie) erasing WP:PSCI-compliant statements from Rudolf Steiner. More eyes needed. tgeorgescu (talk)...

--Hob Gadling (talk) 10:10, 5 November 2022 (UTC) There is a reason why WP:PSCI and WP:RNPOV are distinct sections. Have you read them? SanctumRosarium (talk)...

the majority view, which has to be given due prominence as required by WP:PSCI. We've described the creationist quote mining and the mainstream response...

editors to go through WP:NPOV. Particularly, WP:UNDUE, WP:MNA, WP:GEVAL, WP:PSCI and WP:RNPOV (even if you have before) 6)And last but not the least, please...

find relevant (and appropriate) criticism or commentary, in which case WP:PSCI, WP:FRINGE also apply. So not popular discussions, or publications aimed...

why Sungenis's viewpoints are WP:FRINGE. On the contrary, that's what WP:PSCI tells us to do. Tgeorgescu (talk) 17:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC) Ok, I see...

need not be on-topic for the article's main subject. This is core in NPOV/PSCI: "The pseudoscientific view should be clearly described as such. An explanation...

Subliminal stimuli - Includes some pseudoscience but no mention of such for WP:PSCI Illusion - Currently listed at article for improvement (WP:TAFI) Objections...

you to believe. Actually relevant here are WP:BLP, WP:GEVAL, WP:FRINGE, WP:PSCI, WP:MNA... It's also because practical environmental scientific assessments...

Wikipedia:Editing policy#Adding information to Wikipedia. We might similarly update WP:PSCI to say not only that pseudoscientific views should not be given undue weight...

willing to obey WP:PSCI [73] 29 September 2023 — they are not willing to obey WP:PSCI [74] 29 September 2023 — they even deny that WP:PSCI is applicable to...

times to consider them again, including WP:NPOV, WP:FRINGE, WP:UNDUE, and WP:PSCI. The article is not about UFOs, aliens or "ufology", but about the law passed...

952 days ago on 27 October 2023) It has become tedious (attacks upon WP:PSCI policy). tgeorgescu (talk) 04:22, 30 October 2023 (UTC) {{not done}} – not...

highly significant. Accusations that Bem is a hack and his results are WP:PSCI are unfounded. My edit should be included despite the revision by @Hob Gadling...

sources have reported. More useful links for reference: WP:RS, WP:FRINGE, WP:PSCI. For conspiracy theorists, everyone is trying to censor them and the cabals...

Silverseren cover it well. Neither option you propose would comply with WP:PSCI or WP:FRINGE. DFlhb (talk) 22:51, 18 June 2023 (UTC) Thanks, all. I've withdrawn...

represents a fringe viewpoint that "should be clearly described as such," per WP:PSCI––my mentioning in my initial edit that the group has advocated giving pedophiles...

history? Since all WP articles are expected to comply with policy like WP:PSCI and that WP:MEDRS quality sources exist directly supporting the criticism...

original research. And there is no overarching policy applicable, such as WP:PSCI dictating that the scientific orthodoxy gets explained through a bit of WP:OR...

sourced scientific information in other articles as per WP:FRINGE and WP:PSCI. Editors can remove or challenge the addition of any SEGM based evidence...

sourced scientific information in other articles as per WP:FRINGE and WP:PSCI. Editors can remove or challenge the addition of any SEGM based evidence...

between scientific consensus and a discredited method — WP:GEVAL and WP:PSCI are explicit about this. As for the video: a short clip of someone appearing...

Pschologie und Geschichte ? — ? 1 1 1.000 Wikipedia (J·M·T) Google (J·M·T) PSCI ? PSCI ? 1 1 1.000 Wikipedia (J·M·T) Google (J·M·T) PSDB - Partido da Social...

2023—whitewashing contrary to WP:PSCI; [33] 13 November 2023—whitewashing contrary to WP:PSCI; [34] 13 November 2023—whitewashing contrary to WP:PSCI. Diffs of previous...

unadulterated neutrality (a la Larry Sanger). It means WP:GEVAL, it means WP:PSCI, it means WP:DUE and so on. Even if it meant that, Wikipedia follows a British...

edits violate it [66] 29 April 2023 — violation of WP:PSCI. [67] 29 April 2023 — violation of WP:PSCI. Seems a WP:SPA, see Special:Contributions/Emilimo...

subject, but this looks pretty blatant with editing warring, violating WP:PSCI policy, accusing others of vandalism, ax to grind comments, accusing Tgeorgescu...

an explanation how these edits violate it [27] 21 August 2024—violates WP:PSCI by immunizing Anthroposophy from falsification through performing WP:OR (seeks...

due to the off-site canvassing. The topic of Anthroposophy falls under WP:PSCI. There was also a Waldorf education Arbcom case which mentioned Anthroposophy...

Talk:Acupuncture#Survey (lead sentence) "WP:PROFRINGE proposal which violates core WP:PSCI policy [...] This is a disruptive waste of time." 2. Accusation of being...

alerts: in user talk history • in system log Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:PSCI Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation how...

(talk) 03:15, 8 January 2025 (UTC) Eh, you can say "That's WP:FRNG and WP:PSCI and does not constitute due weight as the subject is discussed in reliable...

violate it [32] 10 March 2024—violating WP:PSCI [33] and [34] 11 March 2024—ad nauseam advocacy for violating WP:PSCI, WP:ASPERSIONS; see also their previous...

don't have enough editors who regularly stand against the waves of medical PSCI true believers at this and multiple other articles, and I can quite understand...

including COVID, FRINGE, Falun Gong, among others. I'll be logging this under WP:PSCI since that's the most unifying theme here. Galobtter (talk) 04:14, 10 December...

sourced scientific information in other articles as per WP:FRINGE and WP:PSCI. Editors can remove or challenge the addition of any SEGM based evidence...