This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The section on inelastic scattering present in the page currently is nonsensical. It is a generic description on the inelastic scattering of macroscopic bodies, which has no relation to the subject matter (electron scattering). A proper section on inelastic electron scattering is much needed, as it is, for example, important to understand at which energies inelastic processes (such as the emission of a photon or even hadrons) starts to occur. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jocryptowiki (talk • contribs) 19:28, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page used to redirect to Thomson scattering which is scattering of photons by electrons. In my opinion electron scattering should be understood as the scattering _of_ electrons, so I removed the redirect and wrote this stub. O. Prytz 10:52, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Began work on writing the Electron scattering stub into an article. Wrote and referenced a new introduction that I still need to expand upon and restructured the Types of Scattering for expansion. IndianFace (talk) 11:29, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just a suggestion as to how you could continue the article after the different types of scattering have been discussed. You could talk about the implications of the different types and explain why they are useful to physics.

PWS91 (talk) 13:39, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Electron scattering. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130916180922/http://school-for-champions.com/science/magnetic_force_lorentz.htm to http://www.school-for-champions.com/science/magnetic_force_lorentz.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131023022419/http://www.physics.ox.ac.uk/documents/PUS/dis/scattering.htm to http://www.physics.ox.ac.uk/documents/PUS/dis/scattering.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130823223714/http://www.physics.ox.ac.uk/documents/PUS/dis/SLAC.htm to http://www.physics.ox.ac.uk/documents/PUS/dis/SLAC.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131128065649/https://www6.slac.stanford.edu/about/vision-and-mission.aspx to https://www6.slac.stanford.edu/about/vision-and-mission.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:25, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is a general article on scattering, not just electron scattering. By the way, Compton scattering isn't electron scattering. Poorly written article!

Added by User:Ldm1954, March 6th. Agreed, this is a poorly written article. Ignore RHEED, Electron diffraction, Electron microscopy and more. Some of the history is also poor, for instance what about the experiment of George Paget Thomson and Alexander Reid.

I suggest renaming it High Energy Electron Scattering, and removing parts that do not fit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ldm1954 (talk • contribs) 20:15, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]