The simplest case, SU(1), is the trivial group, having only a single element. The group SU(2) is isomorphic to the group of quaternions of norm 1, and is thus diffeomorphic to the 3-sphere. Since unit quaternions can be used to represent rotations in 3-dimensional space (up to sign), there is a surjectivehomomorphism from SU(2) to the rotation group SO(3) whose kernel is {+I, −I}.[b] Since the quaternions can be identified as the even subalgebra of the Clifford Algebra Cl(3), SU(2) is in fact identical to one of the symmetry groups of spinors, Spin(3), that enables a spinor presentation of rotations.
The center of SU(n) is isomorphic to the cyclic group, and is composed of the diagonal matrices ζI for ζ an nth root of unity and I the n × n identity matrix.
The Lie algebra of SU(n), denoted by , can be identified with the set of tracelessanti‑Hermitiann × n complex matrices, with the regular commutator as a Lie bracket. Particle physicists often use a different, equivalent representation: The set of traceless Hermitiann × n complex matrices with Lie bracket given by −i times the commutator.
The Lie algebra of consists of n × nskew-Hermitian matrices with trace zero.[4] This (real) Lie algebra has dimension n2 − 1. More information about the structure of this Lie algebra can be found below in § Lie algebra structure.
Fundamental representation
In the physics literature, it is common to identify the Lie algebra with the space of trace-zero Hermitian (rather than the skew-Hermitian) matrices. That is to say, the physicists' Lie algebra differs by a factor of from the mathematicians'. With this convention, one can then choose generators Ta that are tracelessHermitian complex n × n matrices, where:
where the f are the structure constants and are antisymmetric in all indices, while the d-coefficients are symmetric in all indices.
As a consequence, the commutator is:
and the corresponding anticommutator is:
The factor of i in the commutation relation arises from the physics convention and is not present when using the mathematicians' convention.
By convention, in the physics literature the generators are defined as the traceless Hermitian complex matrices with a prefactor: for the group, the generators are chosen as where are the Pauli matrices, while for the case of one defines where are the Gell-Mann matrices.[6] With these definitions, the generators satisfy the following normalization condition:
Adjoint representation
In the (n2 − 1)-dimensional adjoint representation, the generators are represented by (n2 − 1) × (n2 − 1) matrices, whose elements are defined by the structure constants themselves:
If we consider as a pair in where and , then the equation becomes
This is the equation of the 3-sphere S3. This can also be seen using an embedding: the map
where denotes the set of 2 by 2 complex matrices, is an injective real linear map (by considering diffeomorphic to and diffeomorphic to ). Hence, the restriction of φ to the 3-sphere (since modulus is 1), denoted S3, is an embedding of the 3-sphere onto a compact submanifold of , namely φ(S3) = SU(2).
Therefore, as a manifold, S3 is diffeomorphic to SU(2), which shows that SU(2) is simply connected and that S3 can be endowed with the structure of a compact, connected Lie group.
This map is in fact a group isomorphism. Additionally, the determinant of the matrix is the squared norm of the corresponding quaternion. Clearly any matrix in SU(2) is of this form and, since it has determinant 1, the corresponding quaternion has norm 1. Thus SU(2) is isomorphic to the group of versors.[8]
Every versor is naturally associated to a spatial rotation in 3 dimensions, and the product of versors is associated to the composition of the associated rotations. Furthermore, every rotation arises from exactly two versors in this fashion. In short: there is a 2:1 surjective homomorphism from SU(2) to SO(3); consequently SO(3) is isomorphic to the quotient groupSU(2)/{±I}, the manifold underlying SO(3) is obtained by identifying antipodal points of the 3-sphere S3, and SU(2) is the universal cover of SO(3).
The group SU(3) is a simply-connected, compact Lie group.[10] Its topological structure can be understood by noting that SU(3) acts transitively on the unit sphere in . The stabilizer of an arbitrary point in the sphere is isomorphic to SU(2), which topologically is a 3-sphere. It then follows that SU(3) is a fiber bundle over the base S5 with fiber S3. Since the fibers and the base are simply connected, the simple connectedness of SU(3) then follows by means of a standard topological result (the long exact sequence of homotopy groups for fiber bundles).[11]
The SU(2)-bundles over S5 are classified by since any such bundle can be constructed by looking at trivial bundles on the two hemispheres and looking at the transition function on their intersection, which is a copy of S4, so
Then, all such transition functions are classified by homotopy classes of maps
and as rather than , SU(3) cannot be the trivial bundle SU(2) × S5 ≅ S3 × S5, and therefore must be the unique nontrivial (twisted) bundle. This can be shown by looking at the induced long exact sequence on homotopy groups.
while all other fabc not related to these by permutation are zero. In general, they vanish unless they contain an odd number of indices from the set {2, 5, 7}.[c]
The symmetric coefficients d take the values
They vanish if the number of indices from the set {2, 5, 7} is odd.
A generic SU(3) group element generated by a traceless 3×3 Hermitian matrix H, normalized as tr(H2) = 2, can be expressed as a second order matrix polynomial in H:[13]
LP
where
Lie algebra structure
As noted above, the Lie algebra of SU(n) consists of n × nskew-Hermitian matrices with trace zero.[14]
The complexification of the Lie algebra is , the space of all n × n complex matrices with trace zero.[15] A Cartan subalgebra then consists of the diagonal matrices with trace zero,[16] which we identify with vectors in whose entries sum to zero. The roots then consist of all the n(n − 1) permutations of (1, −1, 0, ..., 0).
Specifically, fix a Hermitian matrixA of signature pq in , then all
satisfy
Often one will see the notation SU(p, q) without reference to a ring or field; in this case, the ring or field being referred to is and this gives one of the classical Lie groups. The standard choice for A when is
However, there may be better choices for A for certain dimensions which exhibit more behaviour under restriction to subrings of .
Example
An important example of this type of group is the Picard modular group which acts (projectively) on complex hyperbolic space of degree two, in the same way that acts (projectively) on real hyperbolic space of dimension two. In 2005 Gábor Francsics and Peter Lax computed an explicit fundamental domain for the action of this group on HC2.[18]
A further example is , which is isomorphic to .
Important subgroups
In physics the special unitary group is used to represent fermionic symmetries. In theories of symmetry breaking it is important to be able to find the subgroups of the special unitary group. Subgroups of SU(n) that are important in GUT physics are, for p > 1, n − p > 1,
Since the rank of SU(n) is n − 1 and of U(1) is 1, a useful check is that the sum of the ranks of the subgroups is less than or equal to the rank of the original group. SU(n) is a subgroup of various other Lie groups,
There are also the accidental isomorphisms: SU(4) = Spin(6), SU(2) = Spin(3) = Sp(1),[d] and U(1) = Spin(2) = SO(2).
One may finally mention that SU(2) is the double covering group of SO(3), a relation that plays an important role in the theory of rotations of 2-spinors in non-relativistic quantum mechanics.
This group is isomorphic to SL(2,ℝ) and Spin(2,1)[19] where the numbers separated by a comma refer to the signature of the quadratic form preserved by the group. The expression in the definition of SU(1,1) is an Hermitian form which becomes an isotropic quadratic form when u and v are expanded with their real components.
An early appearance of this group was as the "unit sphere" of coquaternions, introduced by James Cockle in 1852. Let
Then the 2×2 identity matrix, and and the elements i, j, and k all anticommute, as in quaternions. Also is still a square root of −I2 (negative of the identity matrix), whereas are not, unlike in quaternions. For both quaternions and coquaternions, all scalar quantities are treated as implicit multiples of I2 and notated as 1.
The coquaternion with scalar w, has conjugate similar to Hamilton's quaternions. The quadratic form is
Note that the 2-sheet hyperboloid corresponds to the imaginary units in the algebra so that any point p on this hyperboloid can be used as a pole of a sinusoidal wave according to Euler's formula.
The hyperboloid is stable under SU(1, 1), illustrating the isomorphism with Spin(2, 1). The variability of the pole of a wave, as noted in studies of polarization, might view elliptical polarization as an exhibit of the elliptical shape of a wave with pole . The Poincaré sphere model used since 1892 has been compared to a 2-sheet hyperboloid model,[20] and the practice of SU(1, 1) interferometry has been introduced.
^Francsics, Gabor; Lax, Peter D. (September 2005). "An explicit fundamental domain for the Picard modular group in two complex dimensions". arXiv:math/0509708.
^Gilmore, Robert (1974). Lie Groups, Lie Algebras and some of their Applications. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 52, 201−205. MR1275599.
^Siegel, C. L. (1971). Topics in Complex Function Theory. Vol. 2. Translated by Shenitzer, A.; Tretkoff, M. Wiley-Interscience. pp. 13–15. ISBN0-471-79080 X.
References
Hall, Brian C. (2015), Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Representations: An Elementary Introduction, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 222 (2nd ed.), Springer, ISBN978-3319134666
Iachello, Francesco (2006), Lie Algebras and Applications, Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 708, Springer, ISBN3540362363