Share to: share facebook share twitter share wa share telegram print page

 

Karasuk languages

Karasuk
Burusho-Yeniseian
(controversial)
Geographic
distribution
Central Siberia and northern Pakistan
Linguistic classificationProposed language family
Subdivisions
Language codes
ISO 639-3
GlottologNone
Modern distribution of Karasuk languages[image reference needed]

Karasuk is a hypothetical language family that links the Yeniseian languages of central Siberia with the Burushaski language of northern Pakistan.

History of proposals

Hyde Clarke (1870) first noted a possible connection between the Yeniseian and Burushaski languages.[1]

The name Karasuk was proposed by George van Driem of the University of Leiden.[2] The family is named after the Karasuk culture, which existed in Central Asia during the Bronze Age in second millennium BCE. Van Driem postulates the Burusho people took part in the Indo-Aryan migration out of Central Asia and into the northern part of Pakistan, while other Karasuk peoples migrated northwards to become the Yeniseians. These claims have been picked up by anthropologist and linguist Roger Blench (1999).[3]

Václav Blažek (2019) places the linguistic homeland of Proto-Yeniseian close to where Burushaski is now spoken today in Pakistan. He argues that based on hydronomic evidence, Yeniseian languages were originally spoken on the northern slopes of the Tianshan and Pamir mountains before dispersing downstream via the Irtysh River.[4]

Morphological evidence

The evidence for Karasuk is mostly in the verbal and nominal morphology. For example, the second-person singular prefixes on intransitive verbs are [ɡu-, ɡó-] in Burushaski and [ku-, ɡu-] in Ket. Ket has two verbal declensions, one prefixed with d- and one with b-, and Burushaski likewise has two, one prefixed with d- and one without such a marker. However, neither the Burushaski nor the Yeniseian verbal morphology has been rigorously analysed,[5] and reviewers have found the evidence to be weak.[6] While Yeniseian has been proposed to be related to the Na-Dené languages of North America, as part of a newly named Dené–Yeniseian family, the relevant morphological correspondences between Na-Dene and Yeniseian have not been found in Burushaski.[citation needed]

Lexical cognates

Below is a list of possible cognates:[7][8]

Suggested cognates
Proto-Yeniseian Burushaski English
*binč melc chin/jaw
*siː si/su eat
*seŋ sán liver/spleen
*ʔig yek name
*qoʎ qʌt armpit
*təga ʔ(r)ək breast/chest
*pʌx pak clean
*dʌr thɛr dirt/dirty

Kassian and Starostin (2017) list the following potential cognates between Proto-Yeniseian and Proto-Burushaski.[9]

gloss Proto-Yeniseian Proto-Burushaski
‘dry’ *qɔɢ- *qaq-
‘to eat’ *siː- *ʂi-
‘to give’ *=o *=u-
‘to kill’ *xeːy *=s=ʁa-
‘name’ *ʔiɢ *ek
‘that’ *ʔu, *ʔa *i-
‘eye’ *de-s *=l-ɕi
‘I’ *ʔaʒ *ʓa
‘leaf’ *yəːpe *ƛap
‘root’ *ciːǯ *cʰereʂ
‘thou’ *ʔaw *un

References

  1. ^ Clarke, Hyde. 1870. ‘Response to Leitner´s verbal presentation (November 23rd, 1869)’. Journal of the Ethnological Society of London, New Series II: 32-34.
  2. ^ George van Driem (2001) Languages of the Himalayas. An Ethnolinguistic Handbook of the Greater Himalayas, p 1144 ff
  3. ^ Roger Blench (1999) "Language phyla of the Indo-Pacific region: Recent research and classification", in Bellwood & Lilley, eds., Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association Bulletin, 18:59–76, Australian National University
  4. ^ Blažek, Václav. 2019. Toward the question of Yeniseian homeland in perspective of toponymy. 14th Annual Sergei Starostin Memorial Conference on Comparative-Historical Linguistics. Moscow: RSUH.
  5. ^ Van Driem 2001:1146
  6. ^ Roland Bielmeier (review, 2003), "On the Languages of the Himalayas and their Links (nearly) around the World", EBHR 24:96
  7. ^ Starostin, Sergei A., and Merritt Ruhlen. (1994). Proto-Yeniseian Reconstructions, with Extra-Yeniseian Comparisons. In M. Ruhlen, On the Origin of Languages: Studies in Linguistic Taxonomy. Stanford: Stanford University Press. pp. 70–92. [Partial translation of Starostin 1982, with additional comparisons by Ruhlen.]
  8. ^ Bengtson, John D. (2010). Burushaski and Yeniseian and the Karasuk Culture. 14th Harvard Round Table on the Ethnogenesis of South and Central Asia. Harvard University.
  9. ^ А. С. Касьян, Г. С. Старостин. Автоматическое сравнение енисейско-буришской базисной лексики и вероятностная оценка схождений. XII традиционные чтения памяти С. А. Старостина. РГГУ, 23-24 марта 2017 г. (Abstract) (in Russian)
Kembali kehalaman sebelumnya


Index: pl ar de en es fr it arz nl ja pt ceb sv uk vi war zh ru af ast az bg zh-min-nan bn be ca cs cy da et el eo eu fa gl ko hi hr id he ka la lv lt hu mk ms min no nn ce uz kk ro simple sk sl sr sh fi ta tt th tg azb tr ur zh-yue hy my ace als am an hyw ban bjn map-bms ba be-tarask bcl bpy bar bs br cv nv eml hif fo fy ga gd gu hak ha hsb io ig ilo ia ie os is jv kn ht ku ckb ky mrj lb lij li lmo mai mg ml zh-classical mr xmf mzn cdo mn nap new ne frr oc mhr or as pa pnb ps pms nds crh qu sa sah sco sq scn si sd szl su sw tl shn te bug vec vo wa wuu yi yo diq bat-smg zu lad kbd ang smn ab roa-rup frp arc gn av ay bh bi bo bxr cbk-zam co za dag ary se pdc dv dsb myv ext fur gv gag inh ki glk gan guw xal haw rw kbp pam csb kw km kv koi kg gom ks gcr lo lbe ltg lez nia ln jbo lg mt mi tw mwl mdf mnw nqo fj nah na nds-nl nrm nov om pi pag pap pfl pcd krc kaa ksh rm rue sm sat sc trv stq nso sn cu so srn kab roa-tara tet tpi to chr tum tk tyv udm ug vep fiu-vro vls wo xh zea ty ak bm ch ny ee ff got iu ik kl mad cr pih ami pwn pnt dz rmy rn sg st tn ss ti din chy ts kcg ve 
Prefix: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9