Submission declined on 14 April 2026 by Samoht27 (talk). This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content. LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies: hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references. unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual. copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Samoht27 53 days ago. Last edited by Samoht27 53 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 13 April 2026 by MSK (talk). This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content. LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies: hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references. unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual. copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by MSK 54 days ago.

Submission declined on 13 April 2026 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove: promotional language: see Words to watch; personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader; informal language. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use. This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by DoubleGrazing 54 days ago.

This template must be substituted.

This template must be substituted.

This template must be substituted.

This template must be substituted.

openDesk Edu is a community-driven extension of the openDesk^[1] collaboration platform that adds education-focused services such as the learning management systems ILIAS and Moodle. It is maintained primarily through a GitHub repository,^[2] with a secondary mirror on the Codeberg platform.^[3]

The extension emerged from the cost structure of openDesk itself. While openDesk is developed under the ZenDiS project on behalf of the German Federal Ministry of the Interior, its per-user licensing fee of €45 per year creates a significant financial barrier for universities. In February 2026, four German university IT leaders — supported by the Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI) and the Zentren für Kommunikation und Informationsverarbeitung in Lehre und Forschung (ZKI) — published an open letter to Federal Minister Dr. Wildberger arguing that these costs amount to a "strategic dead end" for digital sovereignty in higher education.^[4][5] The letter noted that a mid-sized university would face costs of roughly €1.6 million, while Microsoft 365 is offered to students at no charge, creating what the signatories described as a distorted competitive situation.^[4]

openDesk Edu builds on openDesk Community Edition by layering additional Kubernetes-based services on top of the standard deployment. Services are integrated through a single sign-on infrastructure based on Keycloak, using SAML 2.0 and OpenID Connect (OIDC) protocols, with Shibboleth service-provider components for some applications.^[2] Installation and updates are managed via Helm charts orchestrated by helmfile, and backup integration uses the k8up tool with Restic for persistent data.^[2]

The project was presented at the Chemnitzer Linux-Tage 2026 conference in a 54-minute lecture titled "Bequem oder souverän? openDesk für Hochschulen".^[6] A video recording of the talk is published on media.ccc.de.^[7] Development takes place on GitHub with a secondary mirror on the openCode.de platform.^[2][3]

openDesk Edu is released under the Apache License 2.0.^[2]

• openDesk Edu