Submission declined on 17 March 2026 by Reconrabbit (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Reconrabbit 2 months ago. Last edited by OpalYosutebito 26 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 9 March 2026 by Veggiegalaxy (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Veggiegalaxy 2 months ago.

• Comment: Sources that describe how much funding a company received is routine coverage. No substantial sources are provided that discuss Hippocratic AI. Besides Forbes, which isn't actually about Hippocratic AI, the sources heavily rely on Shah to support them (in interview questions). -- Reconrabbit 15:14, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: Hi! Thank you for working on and submitting this draft! I'm currently declining this submission for the following reasons:
  While the subject has received coverage in reliable sources, the references currently cited are predominantly routine funding-round announcements. These tend to follow a formulaic pattern — amount raised, valuation, investor list, founder quote — and do not constitute the "significant coverage" required by the general notability guideline. Per WP:NCORP, notability for companies requires non-trivial, independent sourcing that goes beyond routine announcements of business activities such as funding rounds. If more substantive independent coverage does exist, it should be incorporated to demonstrate notability.
  The article as written reads as largely promotional. Reliable sources have reported on the founder's previous company Health IQ, which filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in 2023 amid vendor lawsuits and fraud allegations. An encyclopedic treatment of the subject should acknowledge this context for balance.
  I'm mostly concerned with the former (WP:NCORP) so would encourage you to look to identify any additional reliable sources that speak beyond funding. Veggiegalaxy (talk) 15:09, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Hippocratic AI is an American artificial intelligence company developing generative artificial intelligence systems for healthcare-related administrative and patient communication tasks. The company was founded in 2023 and is headquartered in Palo Alto, California.^[1][2]

The company was founded by Munjal Shah and a group of healthcare and artificial intelligence specialists.^[1][3] Shah previously founded Health IQ, which filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in 2023.^[4]

Hippocratic AI develops conversational AI systems based on large language model technology for healthcare-related applications.^[5]