Common side effects include bone marrow suppression, nausea, and diarrhea.[5] The bone marrow suppression may result in death.[5] To reduce the risk of side effects treatment duration should be as short as possible.[5] People with liver or kidney problems may need lower doses.[5] In young infants, a condition known as gray baby syndrome may occur which results in a swollen stomach and low blood pressure.[5] Its use near the end of pregnancy and during breastfeeding is typically not recommended.[7] Chloramphenicol is a broad-spectrum antibiotic that typically stops bacterial growth by stopping the production of proteins.[5]
The original indication of chloramphenicol was in the treatment of typhoid, but the presence of multiple drug-resistant Salmonella typhi has meant it is seldom used for this indication except when the organism is known to be sensitive.[medical citation needed]
In low-income countries, the WHO no longer recommends only chloramphenicol as first-line to treat meningitis, but recognises it may be used with caution if there are no available alternatives.[10]
During the last decade chloramphenicol has been re-evaluated as an old agent with potential against systemic infections due to multidrug-resistant gram positive microorganisms (including vancomycin resistant enterococci). In vitro data have shown an activity against the majority (> 80%) of vancomycin resistant E. faecium strains.[11]
In the context of preventing endophthalmitis, a complication of cataract surgery, a 2017 systematic review found moderate evidence that using chloramphenicol eye drops in addition to an antibiotic injection (cefuroxime or penicillin) will likely lower the risk of endophthalmitis, compared to eye drops or antibiotic injections alone.[12]
Spectrum
Chloramphenicol has a broad spectrum of activity and has been effective in treating ocular infections such as conjunctivitis, blepharitis etc. caused by a number of bacteria including Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Escherichia coli. It is not effective against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The following susceptibility data represent the minimum inhibitory concentration for a few medically significant organisms.[13]
Escherichia coli: 0.015 – 10,000 μg/mL
Staphylococcus aureus: 0.06 – 128 μg/mL
Streptococcus pneumoniae: 2 – 16 μg/mL
Each of these concentrations is dependent upon the bacterial strain being targeted. Some strains of E coli, for example, show spontaneous emergence of chloramphenicol resistance.[14][15]
Resistance
Three mechanisms of resistance to chloramphenicol are known: reduced membrane permeability, mutation of the 50S ribosomal subunit, and elaboration of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase. It is easy to select for reduced membrane permeability to chloramphenicol in vitro by serial passage of bacteria, and this is the most common mechanism of low-level chloramphenicol resistance. High-level resistance is conferred by the cat-gene;[16] this gene codes for an enzyme called chloramphenicol acetyltransferase, which inactivates chloramphenicol by covalently linking one or two acetyl groups, derived from acetyl-S-coenzyme A, to the hydroxyl groups on the chloramphenicol molecule. The acetylation prevents chloramphenicol from binding to the ribosome. Resistance-conferring mutations of the 50S ribosomal subunit are rare.[medical citation needed]
Some other resistance genes beyond cat are known, such as chloramphenicol hydrolase,[18] and chloramphenicol phosphotransferase.[19]
Adverse effects
Aplastic anemia
The most serious side effect of chloramphenicol treatment is aplastic anaemia ('AA'). This effect is rare but sometimes fatal. The risk of AA is high enough that alternatives should be strongly considered. Treatments are available but expensive. No way exists to predict who may or may not suffer this side effect. The effect usually occurs weeks or months after treatment has been stopped, and a genetic predisposition may be involved. It is not known whether monitoring the blood counts of patients can prevent the development of aplastic anaemia, but patients are recommended to have a baseline blood count with a repeat blood count every few days while on treatment.[20] Chloramphenicol should be discontinued if the complete blood count drops. The highest risk is with oral chloramphenicol (affecting 1 in 24,000–40,000)[21] and the lowest risk occurs with eye drops (affecting less than one in 224,716 prescriptions).[22]
Thiamphenicol, a related compound with a similar spectrum of activity, is available in Italy and China for human use, and has never been associated with aplastic anaemia. Thiamphenicol is available in the U.S. and Europe as a veterinary antibiotic, but is not approved for use in humans.[citation needed]
Bone marrow suppression
Chloramphenicol may cause bone marrow suppression during treatment; this is a direct toxic effect of the drug on human mitochondria.[23] This effect manifests first as a fall in hemoglobin levels, which occurs quite predictably once a cumulative dose of 20 g has been given. The anaemia is fully reversible once the drug is stopped and does not predict future development of aplastic anaemia. Studies in mice have suggested existing marrow damage may compound any marrow damage resulting from the toxic effects of chloramphenicol.[24]
Leukemia
Leukemia, a cancer of the blood or bone marrow, is characterized by an abnormal increase of immature white blood cells. The risk of childhood leukemia is increased, as demonstrated in a Chinese case–control study,[25] and the risk increases with length of treatment.
Gray baby syndrome
Intravenous chloramphenicol use has been associated with the so-called gray baby syndrome.[26]
This phenomenon occurs in newborn infants because they do not yet have fully functional liver enzymes (i.e. UDP-glucuronyl transferase), so chloramphenicol remains unmetabolized in the body.[27]
This causes several adverse effects, including hypotension and cyanosis. The condition can be prevented by using the drug at the recommended doses, and monitoring blood levels.[28][29][30]
Hypersensitivity reactions
Fever, macular and vesicular rashes, angioedema, urticaria, and anaphylaxis may occur. Herxheimer's reactions have occurred during therapy for typhoid fever.[31]
Neurotoxic reactions
Headache, mild depression, mental confusion, and delirium have been described in patients receiving chloramphenicol. Optic and peripheral neuritis have been reported, usually following long-term therapy. If this occurs, the drug should be promptly withdrawn.[31] It is theorized that this is caused by chloramphenicol's effects on the metabolism of B-Vitamins, specifically B-12.[32]
Pharmacokinetics
Chloramphenicol is extremely lipid-soluble; it remains relatively unbound to protein and is a small molecule. It has a large apparent volume of distribution and penetrates effectively into all tissues of the body, including the brain. Distribution is not uniform, with highest concentrations found in the liver and kidney, with lowest in the brain and cerebrospinal fluid.[31] The concentration achieved in brain and cerebrospinal fluid is around 30 to 50% of the overall average body concentration, even when the meninges are not inflamed; this increases to as high as 89% when the meninges are inflamed.[citation needed]
Chloramphenicol increases the absorption of iron.[33]
Use in special populations
Chloramphenicol is metabolized by the liver to chloramphenicol glucuronate (which is inactive). In liver impairment, the dose of chloramphenicol must therefore be reduced. No standard dose reduction exists for chloramphenicol in liver impairment, and the dose should be adjusted according to measured plasma concentrations.
The majority of the chloramphenicol dose is excreted by the kidneys as the inactive metabolite, chloramphenicol glucuronate. Only a tiny fraction of the chloramphenicol is excreted by the kidneys unchanged. Plasma levels should be monitored in patients with renal impairment, but this is not mandatory. Chloramphenicol succinate ester (an intravenous prodrug form) is readily excreted unchanged by the kidneys, more so than chloramphenicol base, and this is the major reason why levels of chloramphenicol in the blood are much lower when given intravenously than orally.[34] Chloramphenicol passes into breast milk, so should therefore be avoided during breast feeding, if possible.[35]
Dose monitoring
Plasma levels of chloramphenicol must be monitored in neonates and patients with abnormal liver function. Plasma levels should be monitored in all children under the age of four, the elderly, and patients with kidney failure.
Because efficacy and toxicity of chloramphenicol are associated with a maximum serum concentration, peak levels (one hour after the intravenous dose is given) should be 10–20 μg/mL with toxicity > 40 μg/mL; trough levels (taken immediately before a dose) should be 5–10 μg/mL.[36][37]
Drug interactions
Administration of chloramphenicol concomitantly with bone marrow depressant drugs is contraindicated, although concerns over aplastic anaemia associated with ocular chloramphenicol have largely been discounted.[38]
In 1972, Senator Ted Kennedy combined the two examples of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study and the 1958 Los Angeles Infant Chloramphenicol experiments as initial subjects of a Senate Subcommittee investigation into dangerous medical experimentation on human subjects.[50]
In 2007, the accumulation of reports associating aplastic anemia and blood dyscrasia with chloramphenicol eye drops led to the classification of "probable human carcinogen" according to World Health Organization criteria, based on the known published case reports and the spontaneous reports submitted to the National Registry of Drug-Induced Ocular Side Effects.[51]
Society and culture
Names
Chloramphenicol is available as a generic worldwide under many brandnames[52] and also under various generic names in eastern Europe and Russia, including chlornitromycin, levomycetin, and chloromycetin; the racemate is known as synthomycetin.[53]
Formulations
Chloramphenicol is available as a capsule or as a liquid. In some countries, it is sold as chloramphenicol palmitateester (CPE). CPE is inactive, and is hydrolysed to active chloramphenicol in the small intestine. No difference in bioavailability is noted between chloramphenicol and CPE.[citation needed]
Manufacture of oral chloramphenicol in the U.S. stopped in 1991, because the vast majority of chloramphenicol-associated cases of aplastic anaemia are associated with the oral preparation. No oral formulation of chloramphenicol is available in the U.S. for human use.[54]
In molecular biology, chloramphenicol is prepared in ethanol.[citation needed]
Intravenous
The intravenous (IV) preparation of chloramphenicol is the succinate ester. This creates a problem: Chloramphenicol succinate ester is an inactive prodrug and must first be hydrolysed to chloramphenicol; however, the hydrolysis process is often incomplete, and 30% of the dose is lost and removed in the urine. Serum concentrations of IV chloramphenicol are only 70% of those achieved when chloramphenicol is given orally.[55] For this reason, the dose needs to be increased to 75 mg/kg/day when administered IV to achieve levels equivalent to the oral dose.[56]
Oily
Oily chloramphenicol (or chloramphenicol oil suspension) is a long-acting preparation of chloramphenicol first introduced by Roussel in 1954; marketed as Tifomycine, it was originally used as a treatment for typhoid. Roussel stopped production of oily chloramphenicol in 1995; the International Dispensary Association Foundation has manufactured it since 1998, first in Malta and then in India from December 2004.[57]
Oily chloramphenicol was first used to treat meningitis in 1975[58] and numerous studies since have demonstrated its efficacy.[59][60][61] It is the cheapest treatment available for meningitis (US$5 per treatment course, compared to US$30 for ampicillin and US$15 for five days of ceftriaxone). It has the great advantage of requiring only a single injection, whereas ceftriaxone is traditionally given daily for five days. This recommendation may yet change, now that a single dose of ceftriaxone (cost US$3) has been shown to be equivalent to one dose of oily chloramphenicol.[62]
Eye drops
Chloramphenicol is used in topical preparations (ointments and eye drops) for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. Isolated case reports of aplastic anaemia following use of chloramphenicol eyedrops exist, but the risk is estimated to be of the order of less than one in 224,716 prescriptions.[22] In Mexico, this is the treatment used prophylactically in newborns for neonatal conjunctivitis.[63]
Veterinary uses
Although its use in veterinary medicine is highly restricted, chloramphenicol still has some important veterinary uses.[64] It is currently considered the most useful treatment of chlamydial disease in koalas.[65][66] The pharmacokinetics of chloramphenicol have been investigated in koalas.[67]
Biosynthesis
The biosynthetic gene cluster and pathway for chloroamphenicol was characterized from Streptomyces venezuelae ISP5230[68][69] a.k.a. ATCC 17102.[70] Currently the chloramphenicol biosynthetic gene cluster has 17 genes with assigned roles.[71]
^ abPongs O (1979). "Chapter 3: Chloramphenicol". In Hahn FE (ed.). Mechanism of Action of Antibacterial Agents. Antibiotics Volume V Part 1. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 26–42. ISBN978-3-642-46403-4.
^World Health Organization (2019). World Health Organization model list of essential medicines: 21st list 2019. Geneva: World Health Organization. hdl:10665/325771. WHO/MVP/EMP/IAU/2019.06. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
^Gil JA, Kieser HM, Hopwood DA (1985). "Cloning of a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene of Streptomyces acrimycini and its expression in Streptomyces and Escherichia coli". Gene. 38 (1–3): 1–8. doi:10.1016/0378-1119(85)90197-0. PMID3905512.
^Forster J, Hufschmidt C, Niederhoff H, Künzer W (April 1985). "[Need for the determination of chloramphenicol levels in the treatment of bacterial-purulent meningitis with chloramphenicol succinate in infants and small children]". Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde (in German). 133 (4): 209–213. PMID4000136.
^Ramilo O, Kinane BT, McCracken GH (May 1988). "Chloramphenicol neurotoxicity". The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 7 (5): 358–359. doi:10.1097/00006454-198805000-00015. PMID3380586.
^Silverman HM, ed. (2006). "Iron Supplements". Pill Book, The (12th revised ed.). New York: Bantam Dell. pp. 593–596. ISBN978-0-553-58892-7.
^Yogev R, Kolling WM, Williams T (May 1981). "Pharmacokinetic comparison of intravenous and oral chloramphenicol in patients with Haemophilus influenzae meningitis". Pediatrics. 67 (5): 656–660. doi:10.1542/peds.67.5.656. PMID6973130. S2CID8701518.
^Wolfe AD, Hahn FE (January 1965). "Mode of action of chloramphenicol IX. Effects of chloramphenicol upon a ribosomal amino acid polymerization system and its binding to bacterial ribosome". Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Nucleic Acids and Protein Synthesis. 95: 146–155. doi:10.1016/0005-2787(65)90219-4. PMID14289020.
^Mildred C, Crooks HM, John C, Quentin RB (July 1949). "Chloramphenicol (Chloromycetin).IV.Chemical Studies". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 71 (7): 2458–2462. Bibcode:1949JAChS..71.2458R. doi:10.1021/ja01175a065.
^Controulis J, Rebstock MC, Crooks HM (July 1949). "Chloramphenicol (Chloromycetin). V. Synthesis". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 71 (7): 2463–2468. Bibcode:1949JAChS..71.2463C. doi:10.1021/ja01175a066.
^Fraunfelder FW, Fraunfelder FT (September 2013). "Restricting topical ocular chloramphenicol eye drop use in the United States. Did we overreact?". American Journal of Ophthalmology. 156 (3): 420–422. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2013.05.004. PMID23953152.
^"Chloramphenicol". go.drugbank.com. June 23, 2023. Retrieved 23 June 2023.
^Glazko AJ, Dill WA, Kinkel AW (1977). "Absorption and excretion of parenteral doses of chloramphenicol sodium succinate in comparison with per oral doses of chloramphenicol (abstract)". Clinical Pharmacological Therapy. 21: 104.
^Bhutta ZA, Niazi SK, Suria A (March–April 1992). "Chloramphenicol clearance in typhoid fever: implications for therapy". Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 59 (2): 213–219. doi:10.1007/BF02759987. PMID1398851. S2CID13369284.
^Rey M, Ouedraogo L, Saliou P, Perino L (1976). "Traitement minute de la méningite cérébrospinale épidémique par injection intramusculaire unique de chloramphénicol (suspension huileuse)". Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses (in French). 6 (4): 120–124. doi:10.1016/S0399-077X(76)80134-5.
^Wali SS, Macfarlane JT, Weir WR, Cleland PG, Ball PA, Hassan-King M, et al. (1979). "Single injection treatment of meningococcal meningitis. 2. Long-acting chloramphenicol". Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 73 (6): 698–702. doi:10.1016/0035-9203(79)90024-5. PMID538813.
^Puddicombe JB, Wali SS, Greenwood BM (1984). "A field trial of a single intramuscular injection of long-acting chloramphenicol in the treatment of meningococcal meningitis". Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 78 (3): 399–403. doi:10.1016/0035-9203(84)90132-9. PMID6464136.
^Pécoul B, Varaine F, Keita M, Soga G, Djibo A, Soula G, et al. (October 1991). "Long-acting chloramphenicol versus intravenous ampicillin for treatment of bacterial meningitis". Lancet. 338 (8771): 862–866. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)91511-R. hdl:10144/19393. PMID1681224. S2CID31211632.
^Boothe DM (March 2012). "Chloramphenicol and Congeners". Rahway, NJ, USA: Merck & Co., Inc. Archived from the original on 31 October 2014. Retrieved 31 October 2014.
^Govendir M, Hanger J, Loader JJ, Kimble B, Griffith JE, Black LA, et al. (April 2012). "Plasma concentrations of chloramphenicol after subcutaneous administration to koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) with chlamydiosis". Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 35 (2): 147–154. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2885.2011.01307.x. PMID21569052.
^Black LA, McLachlan AJ, Griffith JE, Higgins DP, Gillett A, Krockenberger MB, et al. (October 2013). "Pharmacokinetics of chloramphenicol following administration of intravenous and subcutaneous chloramphenicol sodium succinate, and subcutaneous chloramphenicol, to koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus)". Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 36 (5): 478–485. doi:10.1111/jvp.12024. PMID23157306.