Wikipedia:WikiProject Journalism/sources

Goals with this list

  • Improve this custom search engine (CSE) to simplify researching journalism topics on Wikipedia
  • Import the reliable sources from the table (once there is enough consensus) to Cite Unseen
  • Show how useful tools like this could be and build momentum towards building something much better
DRAFT RS List for Journalism topics
Cite Unseen WikiSignals[1] CSE Notes Discussions
Columbia Journalism Review Generally reliable 0.88 Top 20
Tow Center for Digital Journalism n/a Top 20
Nieman Lab Generally reliableZH 0.82 Top 20
Nieman Reports 0.55 Top 20
Poynter 0.90 Top 20
Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism n/a Top 20
International Consortium of Investigative Journalists 0.97 Top 20
Reporters Without Borders 0.91 Top 20
Press Gazette 0.85 Top 20
Review of Journalism n/a Top 20
European Journalism Observatory n/a Top 20
Global Investigative Journalism Network 0.60 Top 20
International Fact Checking Network n/a Top 20 Generally reliable? How much content? WP:IFCN
MediaFile 0.89 Top 20
International Press Institute 0.93 Top 20
LatAm Journalism Review 0.55 Top 20 by the Knight Center for Journalism in the Americas
The Conversation Generally reliable 0.98 Top 20 Lots of high-quality academic content
DW Generally reliable 0.89 Top 20 Akademie.dw.com has journalism focus
Committee to Protect Journalists 0.90 Top 20
Editor & Publisher 0.90 Next 20 Lots of press releases that are hard to filter
Journalism.co.uk 0.65 Next 20 Advertorial?
Digiday 0.55 Next 20 may not be as useful as it once was
American Journalism Review n/a Next 20 1977-2015
Reynolds Journalism Institute 0.55 Next 20
WAN-IFRA 0.55 Next 20
Current 0.60 Next 20
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press 0.90 Next 20
Media Development Investment Fund 0.55 Next 20
The Fix Media n/a Next 20
The Journalist's Resource 0.55 Next 20
International Center for Journalists 0.60 Next 20
Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility n/a Next 20
Knight Foundation Next 20
Pacific Journalism Review Next 20 1994-2024. low volume of content? too niche?
Internews 0.55 Next 20
Media and Journalism Research Center 0.55 Next 20
State Media Monitor n/a Next 20
Global Forum for Media Development n/a Next 20 low volume of content
Local Independent Online News Publishers n/a Next 10
Global Center for Journalism & Trauma n/a (predecessor) Next 10
International Journalists’ Network n/a Next 10
Freedom of the Press Foundation 0.55 Next 10
Media Foundation for West Africa 0.55 Next 10
Media Institute of Southern Africa Next 10
Society of Professional Journalists Next 10
Nordishub n/a Next 10 low volume of content? too niche?
Arab Reporters for Investigative Journalism 0.55 Next 10 member of GIJN
Media Ownership Monitor 0.55 Next 10
Free Press Unlimited 0.55 Next 10
Center for Media Engagement n/a Next 10
NewsGuard 0.86 N Not indexed by Google
Ethical Journalism Network 0.55 N Haven't published much lately
Status N Newsletter?
Puck News N Newsletter?
American Press Institute 0.98 N Publish very little content
WNYC 0.88 N home of On the Media
Columbia Journalism School N
CNN Generally reliable N Reliable Sources TV Show, newsletter
The Media Institute N
Institute for Nonprofit News 0.90 N low volume of content
Mediaite No consensus N WP:MEDIAITE
Media Matters for America No consensus 0.85 N WP:MEDIAMATTERS
Independent Press Standards Organisation n/a N Generally unreliable? Some of its members are deprecated on Wikipedia
Australian Broadcasting Corporation Generally reliable 0.90 N No media section
Swissinfo Generally reliable 0.88 N No media section
Al Jazeera Generally reliable N No media section
BBC Generally reliable N No media section
The Guardian Generally reliable N No media section?
Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society n/a N very low volume of content, not focused on journalism enough

Notes

References

  1. ^ Too soon to say how helpful these scores will be for assessing reliability but it does collect some interesting information in one place (affiliations, some Wikipedia reliability lists, times cited in Wikipedia, etc.). Scores are very early prototypes and should be ignored for now. Including the scores serves a dual purpose of better understanding WikiSignals’ first draft of scoring

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.