DOKUMEN123.COM

matches the behavior you are trying to correct. Shortcut WP:VANDTYPESWP:VANDTYPES Vandalism on Wikipedia usually falls into one or more of these categories:...

reversal of WP:PAGEMOVEVANDALism which had been done as a form of WP:VANDTYPES#Gaming the system to evade the requirement to edit DS/CTOP articles likely...

xtra.co.nz which untrustworthy and potential of Wikipedia:Vandalism WP:VANDTYPES WP:UNBAN. As currently Yotta Kasai has over 5000 fans on facebook, also...

violate copyrights after being warned, this constitutes vandalism (see WP:VANDTYPES) and the usual series of escalating warnings can be followed by a report...

(UTC) "/* top */ Reverted content deletion without justification. WP:VANDTYPES defines this as vandalism." 07:20, 6 March 2018 (UTC) "/* top */ Re-added...

(talk) 00:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC) Question: Which of the entries of WP:VANDTYPES does this fall under? The IP's edits seem to fall under WP:NOTVAND's definition...

his website through external link spamming, which is vandalism per WP:VANDTYPES: Adding or continuing to add spam external links is vandalism if the activity...

I'd know it.) And ruining a page's grammar is vandalism; it is in WP:VANDTYPES. Fleet Command (talk) 03:13, 3 November 2014 (UTC) You really need to...

Result: Warned. Report again if this continues. This is getting close to WP:VANDTYPES#Blanking. Continued removals of sourced content with no talk discussion...

vandalism. Blanking in and of itself isn't necessarily vandalism. From WP:VANDTYPES... " significant content removals are usually not considered to be vandalism...

as far as I can see, you are the blatant breaker of the rule under WP:VANDTYPES. I need not carry on explaining what I have said (and others have as well)...

January 2013 (UTC) Thank you, the area I was not sure about was the WP:VANDTYPES Blanking/illegitimate, section, can you possibly expand on that for me...

vandalism or not (whether or not you do so using Twinkle)... Go to WP:VANDTYPES. See if the edit falls under any of those specific categories. If it doesn't...

is engaged in removal contents without citing a policy in support. WP:VANDTYPES frowns on this action. Codename Lisa (talk) 08:27, 13 February 2018 (UTC)...

Apologies maybe im incorrect on it being vandalism, if so i apologize. WP:VANDTYPES, "Removing all or significant parts of a page's content without any reason...

century. This is to report 2 issues of link vandalism (listed under WP:VANDTYPES) and sneak vandalism WP:SNEAKY as documented under WP:Vandalism done by...

Mystylplx, just for future reference, you might want to take a look at WP:VANDTYPES. Thanks! — SpikeToronto 19:08, 5 December 2010 (UTC) Support revocation...

the edit was made in bad-faith, it does not fall under one of the WP:VANDTYPES. Even if malicious or disruptive, that edit was not vandalism. There was...

now. --Matthew Thompson talk to me bro! 08:31, 22 August 2011 (UTC) WP:VANDTYPES, under heading of "Spam external linking", defines adding external spam...

you still think the above diffs show vandalism, explain which of the WP:VANDTYPES they fall under, because I'm not seeing vandalism in these diffs (with...

spam per WP:REFSPAM. Ian.thomson (talk) It is vandalism as defined in WP:VANDTYPES Link vandalism: "Adding or changing internal or external links on a page...

Nevertheless, Ronggy vandalized MonoDevelop article twice.[243][244] (c.f. WP:VANDTYPES) Investigating his contribution log suggested that these edits are not...

ways that I revert, including when it comes to reverting blanking per WP:VANDTYPES and sometimes reverting WP:Newbie edits as WP:Good faith edits without...

Nothing about this falls under the "Blanking, illegitimate" section of WP:VANDTYPES. The editor made a good-faith effort to remove information in accordance...

Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 22:00, 12 November 2012 (UTC) Not seeing it in WP:VANDTYPES, seems like like the converse of Wikipedia:VANDAL#Misinformation.2C_accidental...

01:52, 27 February 2022 (UTC) It's not an opinion. It's a fact. See WP:VANDTYPES and WP:VANDNOT. Callmemirela 🍁 talk 02:11, 27 February 2022 (UTC) This...

I report him as a vandal instead, since his edits seem to fit with WP:VANDTYPES (as hoaxing vandalism or "including adding plausible misinformation")...

sourced and relevant information without any rationale is vandalism per WP:VANDTYPES, so given that it would have been impossible to block the IP without rangeblocking...

address some issues en masse, not necessiarly in order of importance Per WP:VANDTYPES. Unwelcome, illegitimate edits to another person's user page may be considered...

fair use rationales, constitute a form of blanking vandalism, per WP:VANDTYPES. It is fortunate that the Visual Arts editors are attentive enough to...

over-officious admins who don't know shit about Wikipedia policies. WP:CDB and WP:VANDTYPES in particular. I'll remember to avoid you in future. Jmorrison230582 (talk)...

criteria. This includes baseless removal of {policy} and related tags.” WP:VANDTYPES (NPOV is funadmental WP policy) Since the dispute had not been resolved...

which I should not have done as per policies. I've also gone through WP:VANDTYPES, and understood what can be called as vandalism. I have read them very...

however, that a hatnote on the "threats of violence page" linking to WP:VANDTYPES would not be inappropriate. PianoDan (talk) 16:55, 15 November 2024 (UTC)...

This means that unless there are obvious signs of vandalism (see WP:VANDTYPES for examples of vandalism and WP:NOTVAND for examples of non-vandalism)...

the guideline under this heading Page creation, illegitimate under WP:VANDTYPES section of Wikipedia:Vandalism for this page created recently - Lavender...

xtra.co.nz which untrustworthy and potential of Wikipedia:Vandalism WP:VANDTYPES WP:UNBAN. As currently Yotta Kasai has over 5000 fans on facebook, also...

was previously comfortable with as Lar has gone against WP:NOTVAND/WP:VANDTYPES in [21]. "Significant content removals are usually not considered to be...

vandalism per WP:VANDTYPES, and as such, perfectly reasonable to remove per WP:COIADVICE". Sorry, this is just incorrect! WP:VANDTYPES specifies Bad-faith...

not vandalism but nonetheless disruptive? A: Vandalism is defined at WP:VANDTYPES, I would determine weather an edit was vandalistic based on weather it...

text was apparently instead mostly sourced, so I restored it as per WP:VANDTYPES - Blanking, illegitimate [164]. The exact chronology of this is explained...

was 90% of the article) and asked that we start again. According to WP:VANDTYPES subsection "Blanking, illegitimate", vandalism include "Removing all or...

to?--Bbb23 (talk) 23:58, 17 March 2011 (UTC) WP:AIV probably, see WP:VANDTYPES, copyright violations can be considered vandalism as long as the users...

reversal of WP:PAGEMOVEVANDALism which had been done as a form of WP:VANDTYPES#Gaming the system to evade the requirement to edit DS/CTOP articles likely...

VANDALISM" Consider familiarising yourself with WP:VANDAL, WP:NOTVAND and WP:VANDTYPE, source misrepresentation is not vandalism, you should retract these accusations...

here proves that you think it's appropriate to poison the well. Read WP:VANDTYPES and WP:NOTVANDAL, vandalism and disruptive editing are not the same, the...