DOKUMEN123.COM

criteria. 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The UPSD tool is marking the YouTube link in red. 3c. The list meets requirements...

annotations. 3b. The UPSD tool frowns on Medium.com. Some websites, such as Bloody Disgusting, I'm not qualified to assess. Otherwise, UPSD isn't indicating...

along with their best sources. The Unreliable/Predatory Sources Detector (WP:UPSD) is a user script for identifying suspect sources used in an article. Cite...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

required, with or without an sronly template, so I added one. I say below that UPSD isn't picking up any problems, and that's true, nothing that I consider a...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

online-access/online-archives links (or [1]). Also, if you don't have WP:UPSD, I recommend using it. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 16:33, 16 January 2021 (UTC)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

film sources, but they seem to be okay for what you're using them for. The UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). Refs...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems except for the external link (which is...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

not taking a position on whether refs #75, #91 and #131 need the same. The UPSD tool is a bit skeptical of Times of India; I'm not taking a position, I'm...

well-sourced to apparently reliable sources (I can't read some of them), and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and I mostly AGF on sourcing. Forbes.com/sites is being flagged by the UPSD tool as iffy (it depends on the particular page), and Express is flagged...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

Repository Counter-Vandalism Unit Tag: disinformation at the Wikimedia blog WP:UPSD, a user script which highlights potentially unreliable citations Astroturfing...

interest you. A quick note on how to install user scripts, using my own WP:UPSD (which is hosted at User:Headbomb/unreliable.js) as an example. The other...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review)...

lists ... I have no idea what's going on at, for instance, The Oklahoman). UPSD is flagging Huffpost, but it's not a problem. The tool isn't indicating any...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems other than the usual warnings about IMDB...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

criteria. 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but I'll check back after the...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

criteria. 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The UPSD tool is marking two refs in red, so as usual, I'll come back and have another...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). Ref...

criteria. 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The UPSD tool is marking one of the sources in red (TV.com, and that's also a dead...

five of the sources currently used in the draft are in yellow and red at WP:UPSD. I removed the three it highlighted in the article.--Launchballer 20:28,...

annotations. 3b. The sources appear to be reliable (but see below), and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and it is marked deprecated in the Unreliable/Predatory Source Detector (UPSD) script and listed as a source to avoid by WikiProject Aviation. Simple Flying...

Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources Wikipedia:Deprecated sources WP:UPSD - A user script designed to facilitate the detection of unreliable sources...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. Sourcing is excellent, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). 3c....

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems. All relevant retrieval dates are...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

official sites (Wordpress) would otherwise be problematic (as marked by the UPSD tool). @Dank: After some internet digging, I was able to find reliable secondary...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). 3c....

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any (actual) problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to apparently reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

but this isn't a source review. A lot of work has gone into improving the UPSD tool over the years; it's marking four citations in yellow, indicating "it...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

the site is unreliable, followed by another editor adding the ref to WP:UPSD, which seems to affirm unreliability. Admittedly a RS discussion with only...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

(Google doc) that have been vetted by the Vaccine Safety Net. Script WP:UPSD – a user script to identify a variety of unreliable sources Current events...

User:Headbomb helps maintain it, the UPSD should be flagging the same set of sources, and it might be a good idea to mention the UPSD in the tag/filter documentation...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

sources (the English-language ones, anyway ... my French is terrible), and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any other problems (but this isn't a source review)...

well-sourced to apparently reliable sources (I can't read some of them), and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

criteria. 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems. All relevant retrieval dates are present...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

criteria. 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

script is doing above, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:35, 20 June 2020 (UTC) See WP:UPSD#Limitations, third bullet in the nutshell section. See also this fix (which...

internet by an international-artists-organisations such as; UNESCO/AIAP/UPSD such is also a reference. The article contains 3 clean photograph, one is...

mean Headbomb's script (didn't think of that earlier, brainfart)? Per WP:UPSD it says This is not a tool to be mindlessly used, It does not answer whether...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

reliable sources. Three others were flagged (correctly) as unreliable by WP:UPSD. ThaesOfereode (talk) 17:36, 27 January 2026 (UTC) Delete. The bulk of the...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review and I...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The UPSD tool frowns on Medium.com. Some websites, such as Bloody Disgusting, I'm not qualified to assess. Otherwise, UPSD isn't indicating...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources. The UPSD tool isn't happy about the YouTube links; I suspect they aren't controversial...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. Sourcing: see the source review above. The UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems. 3c. The list meets requirements...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review)...

criteria. 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). 3c....

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems. All relevant retrieval dates are...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

Fact checker Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources WP:UPSD - A user-script that detects and highlights unreliable sources Craig Silverman...

seem to have covered it). 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review)...

sources (the English-language ones, anyway ... my French is terrible), and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any other problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). No retrieval...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). 3c....

3b. The article is apparently well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). I'd...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review)...

Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources - List of commonly discussed sources WP:UPSD, a user script which highlights potentially unreliable citations....

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review)...

{{Unreliable scientific source}} – adds: [unreliable scientific source?] WP:UPSD, a user script which highlights potentially unreliable citations. Giles,...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review)...

items and annotations. 3b. It is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

3b. The sources appear to be reliable (but note my disclaimer), and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). 3c....

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

publications cited by Wikipedia (see this Signpost article for details) WP:UPSD, a user script which highlights potentially unreliable citations. Loscalzo...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems in the References section (but this isn't...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

are also much more aware of the AI issue, twinkle and tools like my own WP:UPSD have been adapted to deal with LLMs and AI editors. Prior to 2025, the block...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but that tool is mainly focused...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

identifying LLM-generated text. The Unreliable/Predatory Source Detector (UPSD) user script highlights citation links that contain a specific piece of text...

FILMIBEAT is considered to be an unreliable source in Wikipedia per WP:UPSD. See the discussion [1]. Note the statement. OneIndia and all its derivatives...

article is well-sourced to reliable sources. The only refs flagged by the UPSD tool are to the War Office, and there's no problem there. Otherwise, the...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

criteria. 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). 3c....

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

appeared here, you can try purging the cache. BTW, for those interested, WP:UPSD will highlight whenever most of these sources are cited. There are some exceptions:...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

except as noted above. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any other problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

are always happy to talk about specific sources at WT:MED or WT:MEDRS. WP:UPSD, a user script which highlights potentially unreliable citations. Including...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). 3c....

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

criteria. 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

article is well-sourced to reliable sources, the best I can tell, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

3b. The article is apparently well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). I'd...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All...

annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to apparently reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. Sourcing is excellent, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). 3c....

should in all likelihood be removed/purged/replaced with {{cn}} tags. WP:UPSD will also make it easier to find them when editing the articles. The count...

Viriditas (talk) 00:52, 15 December 2021 (UTC) In the meantime, you can use WP:UPSD, which will highlight deprecated sources amongst others. Headbomb {t · c...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

browsers, and pink on others. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:17, 30 July 2020 (UTC) WP:UPSD? Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 16:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC) Also I just inspected...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review)...

CiteUnseen user script. – Joe (talk) 10:27, 13 December 2021 (UTC) Or WP:UPSD if you're interested in finding out about bad sources. Highlighting "good"...

(talk) 01:08, 9 June 2020 (UTC) @Amousey: Take a look at WP:CITEWATCH or WP:UPSD. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 14:07, 10 June 2020 (UTC) In the Maureen O’Sullivan...

interest you. A quick note on how to install user scripts, using my own WP:UPSD (which is hosted at User:Headbomb/unreliable.js) as an example. The other...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

websites, YouTube videos, and self-references to Wikipedia). Scripts like UPSD and CiteUnseen can help, but they do not catch everything. Check if the article...

related to such an ask?) — xaosflux Talk 13:43, 16 August 2022 (UTC) WP:UPSD might be related to what you're looking for, but keep in mind the very very...

annotations. 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

October 2024 (UTC) @BuzzWeiser196 I recommend installing the gadget at WP:UPSD, which instantly shows in colour various levels of unreliable sources, including...

alphabetically / by namespace Yes you can filter a list like Special:WhatLinksHere/WP:UPSD current Wikipedia:Featured list candidates ‎ (links | edit) Wikipedia:Featured...

Village pump Policy Technical Proposals Idea lab WMF Miscellaneous Village pump (technical) archive   This page contains discussions that have been archived...

downgrade the source from 'depends on contributor' to 'general unreliable' on WP:UPSD, but I'll update again if consensus is to deprecated/blacklist. Headbomb...

mean Headbomb's script (didn't think of that earlier, brainfart)? Per WP:UPSD it says This is not a tool to be mindlessly used, It does not answer whether...

source Request a source at the Resource Exchange The Wikipedia Library WP:UPSD and WP:CITEUNSEEN are user scripts to assist with evaluating sources Google...

Crossroads -talk- 03:53, 16 September 2021 (UTC) I've pre-emptively updated WP:UPSD to mark RS as a publication whose reliability 'varies with topic/contributor'...

some of those would be flagging a problem that isn't one. A WP:CITEWATCH/WP:UPSD-like solution really is the best thing here. The CiteWatch only looks for...

online-access/online-archives links (or [8]). Also, if you don't have WP:UPSD, I recommend using it. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 16:33, 16 January 2021 (UTC)...

Village pump Policy Technical Proposals Idea lab WMF Miscellaneous Village pump (miscellaneous) archive   This page contains discussions that have been...

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached...

only 128. Tayi Arajakate Talk 00:10, 14 May 2022 (UTC) Both added to WP:UPSD as generally unreliable. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 13:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)...

internet by an international-artists-organisations such as; UNESCO/AIAP/UPSD such is also a reference. The article contains 3 clean photograph, one is...

articles. --NoonIcarus (talk) 00:18, 20 September 2021 (UTC) Note added to WP:UPSD as deprecated. Will update if the close ends up different, but it's snowing...

to it. PraiseVivec (talk) 12:35, 11 February 2022 (UTC) Note added to WP:UPSD as generally unreliable. Will update if the RFC closes differently. Headbomb...

filter. Izno (talk) 17:21, 5 June 2021 (UTC) I would assume so as well. WP:UPSD would help here if that's the case. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:52, 5 June...

criteria. 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The UPSD tool is marking one of the sources in red (TV.com, and that's also a dead...

with much better functionality. Also it's already on WP:CITEWATCH and WP:UPSD. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:28, 28 January 2021 (UTC) Indeed not reliable...

oknazevad (talk) 13:22, 2 March 2022 (UTC) Note Added Ruptly and Redfish to WP:UPSD as deprecated, same as RT. Will change the classification if this discussion...

LiAnna , Sage, I wonder if we need additional training, and/or maybe a new info or how-to page specifically addressing how to deal with citations that...

infected. 😂😂😂  Tewdar  19:37, 28 April 2022 (UTC) Like the others said (WP:UPSD will flag this), International Journal of English Literature and Culture...

(please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 22:13, 24 January 2022 (UTC) Added all three to WP:UPSD. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:27, 25 January 2022 (UTC)...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 14:27, 18 September 2021 (UTC) Added to WP:UPSD as a blacklisted entry too, this should facilitate cleanup. Headbomb {t ·...

The question related to the article on The Hurricane (1999 film). I used an op-ed published by the Star Ledger. <https://www.nj.com/opinion/2014/04/sp...

URL itself. SilverserenC 00:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC) A good time to pimp WP:UPSD, which will highlight Zenodo, ResearchGate, Academia.edu, etc... in yellow...

Note Since it's snowing, I've added all three above as blacklisted in WP:UPSD. I'll update if this closes with a different outcome. If someone has a list...

useful for titles ... feel free to revert.) No "unreliable source" hits on WP:UPSD. FLC criteria: 1. Prose is good to go. 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines...

Beall's list. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:25, 26 June 2021 (UTC) See also WP:UPSD, which will highlight a lot. Although would not have highlighted that one...

excellent Headbomb's useful tool, Unreliable/Predatory Source Detector (UPSD). When installed, it uses colours to give an at-a-glance indication of when...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

(but this isn't a source review). All retrieval dates are present. The WP:UPSD tool isn't getting any hits indicating unreliable sourcing. 3c. The list...

--Jayron32 16:13, 9 May 2022 (UTC) Option 4 yup, it's bad. Added to WP:UPSD as a deprecated source, but I'll update the script if it ends up as something...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

This request is not about original research, it's about individual editors' preference for sources that say the thing they want the article to say. Guy...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

browsers, and pink on others. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:17, 30 July 2020 (UTC) WP:UPSD? Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 16:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC) Also I just inspected...

script is doing above, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:35, 20 June 2020 (UTC) See WP:UPSD#Limitations, third bullet in the nutshell section. See also this fix (which...

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue that was discussed at this noticeboard last year in the...

Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:41, 9 June 2021 (UTC) Note: Added ijvtpr.com to WP:UPSD. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:42, 9 June 2021 (UTC) Headbomb and RandomCanadian...

World Patent Marketing was a start-up company, only in business for about 3 years. Anybody can do the research and learn that these types of companies...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review)...

(talk) 21:12, 7 May 2021 (UTC) As a side-note, I've added EXPLORE to WP:UPSD. It's clearly a nonsense journal. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:25, 7 May 2021...

User Newimpartial will not allow an NPOV tag on the article when there's a clear dispute. See the ​Talk page. It would also help if a non-involved editor...

microcontroller, ST62xx, ST7, STR7, Str7, ST9, St9, Str9, ST10, St10, Stm32, and UPSD. The user also updated STMicroelectronics to point to some, but not all,...

AI-written. Probably the best method I know. WP:UPSD, checks for AI-selected URLs amongst other things (see WP:UPSD#AI-generated). This requires low effort,...

would be very handy for managing citations. Tools like CiteHighlighter and UPSD are all well and good for seeing what has already been assessed as reliable...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review)...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review)...

ISI/Clarivate. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:19, 20 January 2023 (UTC) Note that WP:UPSD will flag the SJIF as a dubious metric. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:21, 20...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review)...

What I'm trying to figure is how WP:ELNEVER might apply to WP:CONVENIENCE#Citation guidelines since it also seems to apply to the links included as part...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but that tool is mainly focused...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review)...

actually presented. Point B bullet 2: the source is marked as unreliable by WP:UPSD. Point B bullet 4: the source describes several instances in which firewall...

SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 04:21, 15 January 2026 (UTC) I see. I think, then, that WP:UPSD already does most if not all of this: see the bottom row of the table in...

have any thoughts given WP:UPSD. KoA (talk) 19:24, 16 June 2023 (UTC) I'm waiting for formal closure before updating WP:UPSD Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:27...

Aaron Liu (talk) 02:16, 19 June 2024 (UTC) Oh right there is that, and WP:UPSD and User:Novem Linguae/Scripts/CiteHighlighter also provide borderline similar...

and annotations. 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review)...

CrossBread, Imaginary Advice and Earth Break). I recently started using WP:UPSD and noticed that it flags the source as generally unreliable, which made...

from additional consideration (yellow) to generally unreliable (pink) in WP:UPSD. You can search for insource:/10\.3390\/nu/ to find articles citing Nutrients...

--JBL (talk) 00:52, 19 December 2023 (UTC) Marking as deprecated in WP:UPSD. Ping me if the closure is different. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 04:01, 22...

Does the following statement, to be added to The Tortured Poets Department, require in-text attribution or can it be stated objectively in WIKIVOICE: "The...

comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review)...

The following discussion will be of interest here. Feel free to join us and explain how the RS policy works in this case: Talk:Mueller special counsel...

Wikiproject-level tools. I'll also take the opportunity to promote one of my scripts, WP:UPSD, which is very useful in finding shit sources in articles. Or warns you against...

etc...), WP:FTN, WP:RSN, efforts like WP:CITEWATCH and scripts like WP:UPSD or WP:CITEUNSEEN, WP:RCPATROL, WP:NPP, etc. all play a part. Headbomb {t...

them. Help cleaning this up would be appreciated. I've added the site to WP:UPSD to facilitate cleanup. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:27, 4 August 2024 (UTC)...

criteria. 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review;...

FILMIBEAT is considered to be an unreliable source in Wikipedia per WP:UPSD. See the discussion [23]. Note the statement. OneIndia and all its derivatives...

problematic cases. Mrfoogles (talk) 22:27, 2 October 2025 (UTC) A reminder that WP:UPSD flags those. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:55, 2 October 2025 (UTC) @Mrfoogles:...

writing a user script to indicate a media outlet's status from @Headbomb's WP:UPSD or RSP. (Just an idea at this stage. I haven't thought about how to implement...

reliable sources. Three others were flagged (correctly) as unreliable by WP:UPSD. ThaesOfereode (talk) 17:36, 27 January 2026 (UTC) Delete. The bulk of the...

the site is unreliable, followed by another editor adding the ref to WP:UPSD, which seems to affirm unreliability. Admittedly a RS discussion with only...

five of the sources currently used in the draft are in yellow and red at WP:UPSD. I removed the three it highlighted in the article.--Launchballer 20:28,...

criteria. 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations. 3b. The UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review)...

2+ especially, page 1 has a lot of corner cases). I also maintain the WP:UPSD script. That said Lack of DOI, especially for new journals published after...

Village pump Policy Technical Proposals Idea lab WMF Miscellaneous Village pump (miscellaneous) archive   This page contains discussions that have been...