DOKUMEN123.COM

redirect from M-185. Shortcuts WP:QUALIFIERWP:QUALIFIER WP:TITLEDABWP:TITLEDAB It is not always possible to use the exact title that may be desired for...

policy - specifically WP:TITLEDAB at WP:AT (a policy), to which WP:PRIMARYTOPIC (a guideline) specifically defers. WP:TITLEDAB states: ... [a] title may...

In case the secondary topic is already mentioned in its own title (WP:TITLEDAB), one can avoid repeating the topic by typing {{redirect-distinguish|REDIRECT|ARTICLE...

probably won't do a full review, but here's a few random comments: Per WP:TITLEDAB, I suggest moving this to Brooklyn Dodgers 1, Boston Braves 1 Brooklyn...

–Gluonz talk contribs 02:25, 24 May 2026 (UTC) As it is a subsection of WP:TITLEDAB, that is the disambiguation policy section, of course it does not specify...

from other subjects with the same proper name. Maybe something like: {{#titledab:Foo Bar (film)}} → "(film)" {{#titlenormal:Foo Bar (film)}} → "Foo Bar"...

Knowledge Graph, which doesn't make sense and directly contradicts WP:TITLEDAB. The purpose of the RM was to rectify this and move the unnecessarily disambiguated...

policy I've ever heard of, and it would have unacceptable results. Per WP:TITLEDAB, article titles should be unambiguous, unless there is a clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC...

move its contents to Wikipedia:Edit tags (currently a redirect) per WP:TITLEDAB and WP:CONCISE. The proposed dab listings can be culled from the hatnotes...

–Gluonz talk contribs 02:25, 24 May 2026 (UTC) As it is a subsection of WP:TITLEDAB, that is the disambiguation policy section, of course it does not specify...

07:46, 13 September 2024 (UTC) Delete per nom. Glaring violation of WP:TITLEDAB. Carguychris (talk) 14:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC) delete. it's irredeemably...

article should simply be moved to remove the unnecessary qualifier per WP:TITLEDAB (only as much detail as is necessary to distinguish one topic from another...

doing this by adding a parenthesised qualifier to the title is against WP:TITLEDAB, since it would not be distinguishing from any other existing article....

broadcaster was accurate, we would only use broadcaster per WP:NCPDAB and WP:TITLEDAB. There's no need for additional disambiguation/precision like sports, there's...

which makes this a {{r from alternative disambiguation}}, per Wikipedia:TITLEDAB. - Eureka Lott 18:13, 20 January 2026 (UTC) This is not an alternative...

because arguments in favor of a move had the support of WP:CONCISE, WP:TITLEDAB, WP:OVERPRECISE, WP:CONSISTENT, and other PAGs that unquestionably prefer...

without moving regardless of how many of the participants support it. Per WP:TITLEDAB: It is not always possible to use the exact title that may be desired for...

an obvious rationale for completely discounting the people opposing. WP:TITLEDAB is policy; if a local consensus at the article were to determine that "List...

doing this by adding a parenthesised qualifier to the title is against WP:TITLEDAB, since it would not be distinguishing from any other existing article....

The relevant policies are in WP:TITLE, specifically WP:COMMONNAME and WP:TITLEDAB. Off the top of my head, if the church is customarily known as "St Peter's...

July 2025 (UTC) Hello, @Pmckay2126. It's called a disambiguator - see WP:TITLEDAB. Where there are several articles about things (or people) with the same...

probably won't do a full review, but here's a few random comments: Per WP:TITLEDAB, I suggest moving this to Brooklyn Dodgers 1, Boston Braves 1 Brooklyn...

for a start, titles shouldn't contain unnecessary disambiguators (see WP:TITLEDAB). Also, mass change at the level of tens of articles should be discussed...