Search Results: Wikipedia:SOURCETYPES
Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Wikipedia:Reliable sources
Rabu, 2026-05-27 09:07:24of a topic as far as we can determine them. Shortcut WP:SOURCETYPESWP:SOURCETYPES Many Wikipedia articles rely on scholarly material. When available, academic...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gina Cunningham
Selasa, 2025-12-16 05:10:3901:14, 10 July 2022 (UTC) Comment – @WomenArtistUpdates: Please see WP:SOURCETYPES; all of the sources presented above are reliable, secondary sources....
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 June 13
Kamis, 2020-10-22 21:31:11academic publishers, and peer reviewed journals) would be best, see WP:SOURCETYPES. Good examples of these types of sources can be found in the references...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Endosex
Sabtu, 2025-12-13 23:41:32(hence no notability) in the scholarly literature that we prefer per WP:SOURCETYPES (and many of the results for it are for an unrelated all-caps portmanteau...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Gokhshtein
Jumat, 2025-12-19 02:07:05(UTC) Should now pass via WP:SNG on WP:BASIC notability via academic WP:SOURCETYPES Rescendent (talk) 04:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/samash.com
Sabtu, 2011-12-17 17:31:56(diff !top) - Link: www.samash.com/catalog/showitem.asp?itemid=69031&sourcetype=singleitemsearch (R/Xmeta/L) 2008-12-15 04:48:10 (UTC): User 76.98.251...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orders of magnitude (voltage)
Selasa, 2025-12-09 13:17:32how-to. It doesn't tell the reader how to do anything. WP:RS, under WP:SOURCETYPES, list textbooks under "usually the most reliable sources". Absolutely...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jozo Acksteiner
Minggu, 2025-09-21 06:02:04proquest.com/docview/304694196?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Dissertations%20&%20Theses] and a co-authored paper from 2013.[https://trid...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nemesysco
Jumat, 2025-12-12 13:27:07articles from peer-reviewed journals, which are the most reliable of WP:SOURCETYPES. Where I think I may be starting to agree with you, though, is an the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inno Setup
Senin, 2025-12-22 05:58:11verified all the sources that I provided. I want to highlight that WP:SOURCETYPES mentions that, "Many Wikipedia articles rely on scholarly material. When...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Sambot 3
Selasa, 2011-01-04 04:01:06php. The templates.ini file that contains the settings for the run is: sourcetype=categorymembers sourcename=Category:Films that need a synopsis...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Croatia–Philippines relations (2nd nomination)
Senin, 2025-12-15 02:52:38I think you need to actually read some of these policies, such as WP:SOURCETYPES and WP:NEWSORG, and pay particular attention to the part about churnalism...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/School timetable
Senin, 2025-12-15 04:49:59collaboration with a professor, they are researchers. According to WP:SOURCETYPES, Many Wikipedia articles rely on scholarly material. When available,...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive463
Kamis, 2023-01-12 20:43:00overhaul: A lot of the article's text was unreferenced, and per WP:RS's WP:SOURCETYPES, "articles should rely on secondary sources whenever possible", and "when...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive328
Rabu, 2026-02-11 07:25:03uninvolved editors collective views on which are the controlling policies (WP:SOURCETYPES, WP:NOR), but pick up on certain views each expressed by a single editor...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive287
Selasa, 2021-05-25 11:08:13SCIRS essay, and the preference for scholarly sources as specified at SOURCETYPES and defend those often. But when it comes to mass media sources, our...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 380
Senin, 2025-03-03 23:35:01reporting from established news organizations is reliable for facts, but WP:SOURCETYPES notes that [w]hen available, academic and peer-reviewed publications...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 170
Rabu, 2022-01-12 08:31:12(talk) 00:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC) SCHOLARSHIP is a subsection of WP:SOURCETYPES, which includes in its introduction: "However, some scholarly material...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Holocaust and the Nakba
Sabtu, 2025-10-18 10:22:19mentioned in the news are irrelevant as we prefer academic sources per WP:SOURCETYPES. No evidence of OR/SYNTH has been presented but even if it were that's...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 1
Jumat, 2022-12-16 13:50:23and in controversial subject areas scholarly tertiary sources (See WP:SOURCETYPES and WP:TERTIARY). The most widely-used scholarly textbook on modern Indian...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment/Archive 120
Rabu, 2023-01-04 15:52:19sources have been based on sources of lower quality as defined as WP:SOURCETYPES, such as articles published in The Guardian and New Statesman, while...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2026 January 30
Minggu, 2026-03-08 05:09:55proquest.com/docview/302499144?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Dissertations%20&%20Theses on page 215, and https://web.archive...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leslie Controls
Minggu, 2024-10-27 01:29:14https://www.proquest.com/docview/262637776/D0E8E0FD145D41C8PQ/1?accountid=14020&sourcetype=Newspapers The information with it makes a point of the fact it is in...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 July 13
Senin, 2022-07-25 21:43:4701:14, 10 July 2022 (UTC) Comment – @WomenArtistUpdates: Please see WP:SOURCETYPES; all of the sources presented above are reliable, secondary sources....
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mass killings under communist regimes (4th nomination)
Minggu, 2025-12-14 05:02:40in the article currently, and are available more generally. Per WP:SOURCETYPES, [w]hen available, academic and peer-reviewed publications, scholarly...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 244
Minggu, 2026-05-17 22:20:29Material should be attributed in-text where sources disagree. — WP:SOURCETYPES Quoted by Tgeorgescu (talk) 06:13, 2 July 2018 (UTC) Let me explain it...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 700
Sabtu, 2022-01-15 10:11:53still preferred over free-to-access but lower-quality sources (see WP:SOURCETYPES and WP:SOURCEACCESS), so I wouldn't worry about readers needing to register...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 March 12
Selasa, 2022-03-29 14:35:25collaboration with a professor, they are researchers. According to WP:SOURCETYPES, Many Wikipedia articles rely on scholarly material. When available,...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 March 19
Sabtu, 2020-03-28 10:05:17articles from peer-reviewed journals, which are the most reliable of WP:SOURCETYPES. Where I think I may be starting to agree with you, though, is an the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 June 26
Selasa, 2020-07-07 08:24:25are usually considered the most reliable of all, Local hero. See WP:SOURCETYPES. The discussion here is very long though, and I suspect you might be...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 March 28
Rabu, 2021-04-14 21:39:30(hence no notability) in the scholarly literature that we prefer per WP:SOURCETYPES (and many of the results for it are for an unrelated all-caps portmanteau...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 October 23
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:07:41how-to. It doesn't tell the reader how to do anything. WP:RS, under WP:SOURCETYPES, list textbooks under "usually the most reliable sources". Absolutely...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 February 6
Senin, 2022-02-14 22:49:14I think you need to actually read some of these policies, such as WP:SOURCETYPES and WP:NEWSORG, and pay particular attention to the part about churnalism...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 251
Minggu, 2021-10-31 16:23:18does not matter where scholarship is published, per WP:SOURCE and WP:SOURCETYPES, it does matter who published scholarship. EXPERTSOURCE, itself, is far...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 November 25
Sabtu, 2021-12-04 06:30:54in the article currently, and are available more generally. Per WP:SOURCETYPES, [w]hen available, academic and peer-reviewed publications, scholarly...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 354
Kamis, 2023-11-16 21:33:02bias, to condemn an academic journal. That is entirely contrary to WP:SOURCETYPES. Aren't journalistic sources banned from race and intelligence? Is it...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 668
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 08:37:26better sources than websites, where they exist on the topic. See WP:SOURCETYPES. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC) I'm trying to create...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 274
Rabu, 2020-12-30 23:39:14what you say it does. You are citing a subsection of the section WP:SOURCETYPES, which lists several different types of sources. If our sourcing of specific...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 232
Selasa, 2026-03-03 00:21:16thousands of items otherwise reported as monuments and memorials. Also WP:SOURCETYPES is a self-published item from an advocacy group. Also it has been shown...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 364
Senin, 2022-01-31 11:11:51correct (like an iNat observation)? Yes. Per WP:SOURCEACCESS and WP:SOURCETYPES. Wikipedia articles should (in theory) be based on the highest quality...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 306
Minggu, 2025-02-23 03:35:16author is listed as an opinion writer) but I think, here, it fails WP:SOURCETYPES as not the kind of source usefully reliable for history. It does suggest...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 666
Sabtu, 2022-07-23 13:21:41surprising that sources behind paywalls are acceptable", but as noted at WP:SOURCETYPES, the most reliable sources for many topics are peer-reviewed scholarly...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Macedonian Diaspora (2nd nomination)
Jumat, 2025-12-12 18:56:06are usually considered the most reliable of all, Local hero. See WP:SOURCETYPES. The discussion here is very long though, and I suspect you might be...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 September 30
Minggu, 2023-10-08 21:33:08(UTC) Should now pass via WP:SNG on WP:BASIC notability via academic WP:SOURCETYPES Rescendent (talk) 04:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 341
Senin, 2021-05-31 19:39:24preferred, per WP:MILMOS#SOURCES and WP:RS (see the first sub-section at WP:SOURCETYPES). If you want an example of what an acceptable source would look like...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 86
Jumat, 2022-02-25 22:36:26sources describe them as far right, some describe them as right. WP:SOURCETYPES, WP:V and WP:YESPOV are worth reading. Graywalls (talk) 09:13, 5 October...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 89
Rabu, 2025-09-24 21:16:35lead, we should be sticking to peer-reviewed and academic sources (WP:SOURCETYPES), and surveying sources more broadly, and not only seeking out sources...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Polls are primary sources
Minggu, 2025-11-16 22:19:15This is an essay on WP:SOURCETYPES. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request/Archive 190
Jumat, 2025-11-07 05:21:35proquest.com/docview/513842753/C5915DB6C38E41AAPQ/1?accountid=196403&sourcetype=NewspapersCharles: C. Peterson Promoting Billiards in Leading Colleges:...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request/Archive 185
Selasa, 2025-06-17 11:22:57proquest.com/docview/104171657/A18A0F839A674056PQ/1?accountid=196403&sourcetype=Newspapers #2 is available via Project MUSE, also in TWL: https://muse-jhu-edu...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request/Archive 198
Sabtu, 2026-06-06 14:03:13accountid=196403&sourcetype=Trade%20Journals and https://www.proquest.com/docview/3237712381/2470B71B88384145PQ/1?accountid=196403&sourcetype=Trade%20Journals...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request/Archive 194
Sabtu, 2026-06-06 14:02:14proquest.com/docview/454282301/F60F3B9E618246B9PQ/1?accountid=196403&sourcetype=Wire%20Feeds ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 23:00, 1 February 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Folley
Senin, 2024-09-16 03:48:05Count source toward GNG? https://www.proquest.com/docview/426571633?sourcetype=Newspapers 465 word article on an exhibition. Does not support the claims...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 September 11
Kamis, 2024-09-19 06:12:34com/docview/1448865598?sourcetype=Newspapers ~ local "The Plymouth Evening Herald Plymouth (UK) ~ Maybe https://www.proquest.com/docview/426608904?sourcetype=Newspapers...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for creation/2006-05-24
Minggu, 2023-02-05 06:28:00attending college. http://online.tvguide.com/newsearch/detail.aspx?id=256784&sourcetype=C&progseriesparentid=&tvobjectid=256784&keyword=Matthew+Libatique&referrer=search1...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marjorie Franklin
Kamis, 2026-02-12 06:42:42University of Minnesota ✘ No https://www.proquest.com/docview/432274056?sourcetype=Newspapers paywalled ? Unknown https://www.newspapers...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard/Archive 84
Minggu, 2022-02-27 11:11:19must always go with the scientific consensus (relevant policies: WP:SOURCETYPES, WP:MEDRS), and I think most experienced editors would agree. However...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive304
Sabtu, 2026-03-07 23:08:29trumps news organization when it comes to reliable sources under WP:SOURCETYPES. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:17, 10 May 2020 (UTC) A test that I've suggested...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Armenia-Azerbaijan 3/Workshop
Sabtu, 2023-03-18 23:21:2720:16, 12 February 2023 (UTC) The guideline on types of sources is WP:SOURCETYPES. SilkTork (talk) 11:20, 23 February 2023 (UTC) @ZaniGiovanni, Dallavid...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request/Archive 186
Sabtu, 2026-06-06 13:56:11proquest.com/docview/222805891/98EF4348721844D0PQ/1?accountid=196403&sourcetype=Magazines ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 15:54, 15 July 2025 (UTC) @Doc...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Caruso
Minggu, 2026-01-04 07:36:29detail (also in Proquest https://www.proquest.com/docview/2549992460?sourcetype=Newspapers ) ✔ Yes https://t2conline.com/maria-caruso-takes-the-west-end/...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Link rot/URL change requests/Archives/2024/July
Selasa, 2024-10-29 00:26:45GreenC 18:53, 27 July 2024 (UTC) Sounds good. Much easier to let the sourcetype be added automatically in the URL when viewing the link without it. MrLinkinPark333...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Boudreaux
Kamis, 2025-05-15 15:49:56there is no byline ? Unknown https://www.proquest.com/docview/2231430427?sourcetype=Trade%20Journals (need Proquest access) Dataquest, an Indian trade journal...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 February 4
Jumat, 2026-02-13 00:04:31University of Minnesota ✘ No https://www.proquest.com/docview/432274056?sourcetype=Newspapers paywalled ? Unknown https://www.newspapers...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Using maps as sources
Selasa, 2026-01-06 22:36:22(UTC) Support. However I still feel that this makes more sense in WP:SOURCETYPES than in WP:NOR. The first policy describes what constitutes a reliable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Venezuelan politics/Workshop
Kamis, 2026-06-04 04:13:3114:07, 27 April 2024 (UTC) Boynamedsue misstates the contents of WP:SOURCETYPES (emphasis added): When available, academic and peer-reviewed publications...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kami Gray
Minggu, 2025-12-07 05:48:38their hands dirty." ✘ No https://www.proquest.com/docview/1659934513?sourcetype=Magazines ~ Country Living magazine ~ One of multiple designers contributing...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 451
Senin, 2026-03-02 04:08:50historical claims might be found in WP:HISTRS (essay), WP:BESTSOURCES, and WP:SOURCETYPES. . ." [emphasis added] And, per WP:RS: ". . . Proper sourcing always...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive348
Senin, 2024-12-23 10:03:04academic criticism to be sourced to peer-reviewed academic publications (WP:SOURCETYPES). Strive for better sources. Use those sources that focus on Boaler and...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 412
Rabu, 2025-09-24 02:26:57be the best ones to build the article. WP:NEWSORG are accepted as WP:SOURCETYPES, and the sources used are reliable, nor they can be dismissed as left-wing...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 July 11
Jumat, 2024-07-19 03:43:00verified all the sources that I provided. I want to highlight that WP:SOURCETYPES mentions that, "Many Wikipedia articles rely on scholarly material. When...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2025 December
Minggu, 2026-01-11 07:21:57which the closer reiterated in the close, however other editors noted WP:SOURCETYPES, according to which scholarly and and academic sources generally prevail...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 490
Sabtu, 2025-10-18 00:22:57October 2025 (UTC) @Czarking0 it's as policy-based as it can be :) Per WP:SOURCETYPES Many Wikipedia articles rely on scholarly material. When available, academic...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 434
Minggu, 2025-07-06 23:43:50used to have information on think tanks and advocacy groups on the WP:SOURCETYPES section of WP:RS, or somewhere else, but I cannot find it; this seems...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 December 27
Senin, 2026-01-05 04:14:26detail (also in Proquest https://www.proquest.com/docview/2549992460?sourcetype=Newspapers ) ✔ Yes https://t2conline.com/maria-caruso-takes-the-west-end/...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard/Archive 96
Kamis, 2026-04-09 00:26:14infringement of WP:Weight, WP:Lede, WP:DUE, WP:NPOV, WP:RECENTISM and WP:SOURCETYPE. After being challenged See here, here, and here, on the merits of his...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 October 11
Selasa, 2025-10-21 08:05:04mentioned in the news are irrelevant as we prefer academic sources per WP:SOURCETYPES. No evidence of OR/SYNTH has been presented but even if it were that's...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)/Archive 73
Sabtu, 2025-12-06 02:14:59It is currently a bit weak, with only a sentence here and there (WP:SOURCETYPES, WP:BESTSOURCES). I say "academic consensus" instead of "academic sources"...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 October 19
Minggu, 2024-10-27 18:20:37https://www.proquest.com/docview/262637776/D0E8E0FD145D41C8PQ/1?accountid=14020&sourcetype=Newspapers The information with it makes a point of the fact it is in...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 November 29
Minggu, 2025-12-07 23:07:43their hands dirty." ✘ No https://www.proquest.com/docview/1659934513?sourcetype=Magazines ~ Country Living magazine ~ One of multiple designers contributing...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 206
Senin, 2025-12-22 21:04:43prevent bias, undue weight, and other NPOV disagreements, and as WP:SOURCETYPES says, When available, academic and peer-reviewed publications, scholarly...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1282
Selasa, 2026-02-10 02:57:52Please see WP:RS. -- Hoary (talk) 00:19, 4 February 2026 (UTC) Wikipedia:SOURCETYPES to be specific. AdmiralCarl (talk) 00:20, 4 February 2026 (UTC) If you...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1258
Sabtu, 2026-03-07 06:30:57in the article that the different sources disagree about the date. WP:SOURCETYPES says Material should be attributed in-text where sources disagree. ColinFine...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 September 13
Senin, 2025-09-22 04:58:57proquest.com/docview/304694196?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Dissertations%20&%20Theses] and a co-authored paper from 2013.[https://trid...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2024 March
Senin, 2024-04-01 19:44:22consider the reliability of sources presented as evidence, per WP:RS and WP:SOURCETYPES. The most obvious example of this is if one editor bases their argument...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 7
Kamis, 2025-05-15 23:43:50there is no byline ? Unknown https://www.proquest.com/docview/2231430427?sourcetype=Trade%20Journals (need Proquest access) Dataquest, an Indian trade journal...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1216
Rabu, 2024-02-28 16:44:44in the Wikipedia Library. https://www.proquest.com/docview/229503392?sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals Polygnotus (talk) 22:56, 19 February 2024 (UTC) Someone...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive326
Rabu, 2024-01-03 23:50:41articles and controversies, fails [WP:Lede], [WP:Weight], [WP:Recent], [WP: SOURCETYPES], and [WP: NPOV] Link, Diff, Diff, Diff, Diff, Diff. Diff - Bloodofox...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1284
Jumat, 2026-02-27 02:52:26proquest.com/docview/3174467505?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals I was wondering if someone could look at these sources...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1280
Rabu, 2026-01-28 02:38:05claim is a ProQuest page (https://www.proquest.com/docview/433882174?sourcetype=Newspapers) that actually cites a New York Times article (https://www...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Meetup/DC/SAWHM Financial Independence Edit-a-thon
Jumat, 2026-04-03 21:16:31com/hnpwashingtonpost/docview/2460344614/59274E14FE0E40EBPQ/1?accountid=46638&sourcetype=Newspapers Holmquist, Carin, and Sara Carter. “The Diana Project: Pioneering...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1126
Rabu, 2026-04-22 17:13:49"truth", misunderstanding the issues of false-balance, not understanding SOURCETYPES, making appeals to ignore all rules in favor of "national interest",...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 239
Sabtu, 2025-02-01 03:42:45infringement of WP:Weight, WP:Lede, WP:DUE, WP:NPOV, WP:RECENTISM and WP:SOURCETYPE. After being challenged See here, here, and here, on the merits of his...
Click to read more »