DOKUMEN123.COM

not a measure of the attention a subject has received. Shortcut WP:SBSTWP:SBST Wikipedia is not a news source: it takes more than just routine news reports...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Company does not meet WP:CORP or WP:N Per WP:SBST "Notability is not temporary" BruceGrubb (talk) 14:42, 30 April 2010 (UTC)...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) BLP1E. Fails GNG WP:SBST, WP:EVENTS, WP:CRIME (no "persistent coverage of the event in reliable secondary...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable events, fails WP:SBST. Equine-man (talk) 19:57, 3 November 2025 (UTC) Comment @Therealbrettcooper:...

– (View log) A biography of a YouTuber with pretty basic WP:BLP1E and WP:SBST issues. A guy of no other particular note made a YouTube video, in which...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails to show adequate notability. WP:SBST may also apply. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 09:11, 24 March 2010 (UTC) See...

of one event by the local CBS station. It does not meet WP:SUSTAINED/WP:SBST. Why? I Ask (talk) 11:30, 16 May 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

certain age or to be WP:SBST, though I would argue it is the latter. Kbbrewster13 (talk) 19:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC) I cited both WP:SBST and WP:SUSTAINED as...

Delete The article has multiple issues and article content fails Wikipedia:SBST, WP:UNDUE and is questionable in other areas too. Pipesmoking Legend (talk)...

over a sufficiently significant period of time, so the question is, does SBST apply here? Alpha3031 (t • c) 13:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC) The sources provide...

It meets the five criteria of WP:GNG. It doesn't perform well against WP:SBST. I found this, but I consider it to be a blog, so I didn't add it in. https://livingbluetx...

covered. CTJF83 GoUSA 04:59, 25 February 2010 (UTC) Keep. Per Eastmain and WP:SBST. Gosox(55)(55) 03:40, 25 February 2010 (UTC) Keep. I don't speak French or...

such coverage, only some of it barely mention the candidate's slogan. Fails SBST by a wide margin. Alpha3031 (t • c) 11:43, 4 January 2026 (UTC) Note: This...

article from a brief burst of news articles about a tragic event. Per WP:SBST, Even a large number of news reports that provide no critical analysis of...

notable than before. Most individual incidents violate WP:NOTNEWS and WP:SBST. *** Crotalus *** 19:45, 14 January 2011 (UTC) Weak delete Some of this might...

WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS, or gossip/tabloid sources that do not contribute to notability per WP:SBST. No WP:SIGCOV in secondary, independent, reliable sources. Contested PROD...

delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:32, 20 November 2011 (UTC) Template:Infobox sbst bus (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Redundant to {{Infobox...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTBROCHURE and WP:SBST. Coverage largely lacks significant analysis. Current article is thus essentially...

Youtube channel itself. The rest of the sources are either WP:SPIP or WP:SBST. It honestly reads more like a promotional biography for the channel by an...

mentions (example), and/or tabloid coverage disallowed for notability per WP:SBST (example). Nothing qualifying turned up in WP:BEFORE search. Dclemens1971...

or no independent investigation, verification, or commentary. See also WP:SBST - "Wikipedia is not a news source: it takes more than just a short burst...

known before or after (obviously, because he unfortunately died). See WP:SBST. --Nlu (talk) 19:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC) Even if Li Jianying is only notable...

of wikicruft around. Accordingly I'd cite WP:NOTNEWS too, specifically WP:SBST because it's ephemeral. WikiScrubber (talk) 14:26, 7 March 2009 (UTC) The...

of Bhatia is mostly incidental as part of routine business coverage (WP:SBST/CORPROUTINE). Does not meet WP:BASIC, and should also be deleted per WP:NOTRESUME...

Furthermore, this is the recording and production of the event itself, so WP:SBST and/or WP:EVENT, including WP:EVENTCRIT and WP:COVERAGE, should apply as...

WP:BEFORE search, are tabloid articles which do not count as WP:SIGCOV per WP:SBST. Given how much of this article is unsourced negative content which I removed...

coverage is limited to tabloid journalism and thus not WP:SIGCOV per WP:SBST. Proposing a redirect to List of programmes broadcast by Zee Tamil (India)...

2024 (UTC) Delete - Does look like article scope is bloated, then per WP:SBST, seems an otherwise minor organization that has received news coverage for...

(UTC) Delete per WP:SBST It makes me feel silly to undo my vote in two consecutive RfD, but I feel (after thoroughly reading it) that SBST applies here. NativeForeigner...

TWL) Fails WP:GNG; sources are limited to tabloid coverage excluded per WP:SBST and WP:USERGENERATED sources. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:59, 15 July 2024 (UTC)...

secondary sources; a lot of his news references feel like tabloid (see WP:SBST). If his career picks up and he gets more notable parts, then an article...

as well as a handful of tabloid items disallowed for notability under WP:SBST. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:53, 22 July 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

These sources cover the exact same information. Wikipedia is not news. WP:SBST: Even a large number of news reports that provide no critical analysis of...

AFC reviewer here. ChrysGalley (talk) 08:17, 20 April 2026 (UTC) Per WP:SBST: Even a large number of news reports that provide no critical analysis of...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable events. I believe it fails WP:SBST. Equine-man (talk) 19:42, 3 November 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

coverage is sufficient. --Cyfal (talk) 17:31, 14 July 2024 (UTC) See WP:SBST: "tabloid journalism is not significant coverage." That means there is insufficient...

sports "rivalry" articles. The main notability guideline's event section WP:SBST addresses this by saying: Even a large number of news reports that provide...

article are tabloid coverage of his engagement (excluded for notability per WP:SBST) and WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS. I couldn't find any other qualifying WP:SIGCOV in...

2024 (UTC) Delete. Coverage consists either of tabloid coverage (see WP:SBST) or WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs; no significant coverage. Dclemens1971 (talk) 11:07...

mentions e.g. games played, match line-ups, so these don't really pass WP:SBST. Recreate if he ever plays at a fully-pro level. BigDom 14:31, 19 August...

the sources are tabloid coverage that is not considered WP:SIGCOV per WP:SBST ([1], [2], [3]); are WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS ([4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]...

find anything notable using this unashamed search engine test as well as WP:SBST at least because the article is unable to establish self-notability. However...

"Release" section. Possibly also a case of WP:TOOSOON and WP:SUSTAINED/WP:SBST (the event being the announcement of the stem player). Throast (talk | contribs)...

Lo dicono a Signa. 20:44, 30 January 2026 (UTC) Delete: WP:NOTNEWS and WP:SBST. The event was a tragedy, and certainly notable on a personal level but not...

"press releases [...] are not valid routes to an encyclopedia article", WP:SBST "routine news coverage such as press releases [...] is not significant coverage"...

Exit B, along Stamford Road outside Capitol Building. For services, check SBST iris or SMRT bus guide. Thank you.) Meet-up time: 1230 hrs Many food choices...

WP:CHURNALISM, WP:INTERVIEWS and tabloid coverage excluded as WP:SIGCOV under WP:SBST. I found only one example of WP:SIGCOV qualifying toward notability (in the...

it is not going to become notable. See WP:NSUSTAINED and particularly WP:SBST: Even a large number of news reports that provide no critical analysis of...

close to a clear and unambiguous violation of WP:NOTNEWS and the derived WP:SBST as one is likely to get (except perhaps the last BIO-related AFD I participated...

type or an extreme level of detail that don't have lasting impact (from WP:SBST: it takes more than just routine news reports about a single event or topic...

model is entirely limited to tabloid news, which is not WP:SIGCOV under WP:SBST, and to primary sources. She appears to promote herself as Miss Croatia,...

not? WikiScrubber (talk) 01:35, 7 March 2009 (UTC) Strong Delete. Fails WP:SBST miserably, not historically notable (WP:NOTNEWS) and extremely unlikely to...

in WalesOnline; the rest is tabloid coverage excluded as SIGCOV under WP:SBST, or it's in unreliable sources like Forbes contributors. Dclemens1971 (talk)...

reporting (which isn't sufficient to attribute it any notability as per WP:SBST), this dish has no real world presence, not even as a joke dish. In my opinion...

mention 10) Routine coverage 11) Passing mention And per WP:SIGCOV and WP:SBST, passing mentions and routine coverage don't count towards notability. Online...

sufficient basis for a topic to have its own stand-alone article." From WP:SBST, part of the notability page. All of these sources are sports coverage and...

handful of other sources are limited to tabloid coverage excluded under WP:SBST and questionable coverage under WP:NEWSORGINDIA. Recommending a redirect...

Current page doesn't seem to be adding any value and being display as news WP:SBST. Mostly it seems to be created for publicity WP:SPIP. — Preceding unsigned...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SBST and WP:GNG. While the shooting is sad and unfortunate, it also is a WP:INHERENT...

WP:SIGCOV, no sources address "the topic directly and in detail". Also WP:SBST, since there is little more than routine journalism discussing the topic...

coverage is limited to WP:PRIMARYSOURCES and tabloid coverage disallowed per WP:SBST. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:39, 9 August 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:SBST Routine reporting, such as these covering her death, do not constitute substantial...

sources, tabloids, and podcasts. I can not find any RS covering it. See WP:SBST" Cpotisch (talk) 21:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC) Automated comment: This AfD...

WP:ROUTINE match coverage. The main notability guideline's event section WP:SBST addresses this by saying: Even a large number of news reports that provide...

Soap Dish, People), which is disallowed for establishing notability per WP:SBST. The remaining sources are limited to: WP:ROUTINE coverage in WP:TRADES publication...

what in-depth coverage exists appears to be tabloid coverage, which, per WP:SBST is not WP:SIGCOV. Other sources appear to be WP:INTERVIEWs and thus ineligible...

mentions seem to be routine coverage surrounding the announcement, excluded by SBST. No objection to redirect though, I just didn't want to BLAR since I anticipated...

at the article: the coverage consists either of tabloid coverage (see WP:SBST) or WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs; no significant coverage and thus no pass of WP:GNG...

of which are now present to satisfy WP:BAND #9 and poss #12 as well as WP:SBST and WP:GNG - to me speedy keep would seem to be the best option.--Wintonian...

person didn't do anything notable except one event, which contradicts WP:SBST. I am sorry to admit that I suspect the listed coverage to be WP:SPIP. Delete...

on him ([8], [9], [10]) Tabloid journalism ineligible as WP:SIGCOV per WP:SBST ([11]) An apparent piece of WP:SIGCOV ([12]) but on a promotional site that...

a notable film). The available sources are all tabloid coverage under WP:SBST and/or of questionable reliability under WP:NEWSORGINDIA. Repeatedly recreated...

mind that tabloid journalism is not considered significant coverage per WP:SBST. The the rest of the sourcing is mainly to the same questionable sources...

WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS of the series (and is otherwise excluded as SIGCOV under WP:SBST). My WP:BEFORE search turns up nothing else beyond a WP:PRESSRELEASE, and...

websites (mostly blogs and forums) floating in the Internet fall under WP:SBST's "...routine news coverage such as announcements, sports coverage, and tabloid...

Blissfulclarity (talk) 14:58, 12 December 2024 (UTC) Delete. Tragic incident. But WP:SBST. BenTanXiaoMing (talk) 17:47, 11 December 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

with historical significance, because it meshes with WP:NOT#NEWS and WP:SBST in terms of Wikipedia's desire to only record individuals who have historical...

mentioned the subject was largely routine, alongside some press releases (WP:SBST and WP:NOTPROMO). I did not find significant converge that addresses the...

debate what's an edge case, where "common sense" would over ride WP:GNG, WP:SBST, or whatever guideline though. Let alone is it the place to re-relitigate...

your first, second, and fourth sources are tabloid coverage, and per WP:SBST, tabloid journalism is not significant coverage. The third source is a Q&A...

state that tabloid journalism is not considered significant coverage per WP:SBST. A few items are cited to Arcadia Pub which publishes the Images of America...

still stands. Ravensfire (talk) 16:52, 22 July 2024 (UTC) Delete. Per WP:SBST, "tabloid journalism is not significant coverage," and that's what this WP:REFBOMB...

24 November 2021 (UTC) Merge per above. References are an example of WP:SBST -- effectively press releases about emplacement and unveiling of the statue...

the topic. McYeee (talk) 23:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC) Keep per CFA and WP:SBST. Article quoting the National Review helps neutrality, and Le Monde was still...

throughout the article (significance??), the rest is about the specific event (WP:SBST? It probably falls under it's own criteria of WP:EVENT which it doesn't pass)...

not just a one time thing. Dream Focus 15:28, 30 January 2010 (UTC) WP:SBST states: "Notability is not predictable: A topic that does not meet the general...

with historical significance, because it meshes with WP:NOT#NEWS and WP:SBST in terms of Wikipedia's desire to only record individuals who have historical...

most of the coverage of the subject could be considered as fitting under WP:SBST, which therefore renders the page as unwarranted as a standalone article...

with historical significance, because it meshes with WP:NOT#NEWS and WP:SBST in terms of Wikipedia's desire to only record individuals who have historical...

with historical significance, because it meshes with WP:NOT#NEWS and WP:SBST in terms of Wikipedia's desire to only record individuals who have historical...

You:Bite 12:18, 3 August 2023 (UTC) On initial review this seems to badly fail SBST. Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:16, 3 August 2023 (UTC) I've reviewed the few articles...

el campeador talk 12:43, 22 June 2023 (UTC) What is routine coverage? WP:SBST, a subsection of our main notability guideline, says this: "For example,...

is there anything to suggest it was anything more than temporary per WP:SBST? There's nothing to suggest it was even a huge deal AS it was occuring. I...

been able to find, and they all fail the test set out at WP:ROUTINE / WP:SBST, even if editors consider the event itself a significant one. The AP article...

with historical significance, because it meshes with WP:NOT#NEWS and WP:SBST in terms of Wikipedia's desire to only record individuals who have historical...

Keep: Easily fulfils GNG. The citations are not "routine" coverage as per WP:SBST, WP:NOTNEWS and WP:ROUTINE (which calls press releases, public announcements...

part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field. WP:SBST would seem to knock this arguement on the head anyway, since it takes more...

coverage is routine or not, but the part of WP:N that covers routineness is WP:SBST. Nonprofit educational institutions could indeed be retained under GNG. Alpha3031...

voting keep based on news announcements, just want to point out that WP:SBST states that routine news reports are not significant coverage, even a large...

Unsosctent (talk) 08:05, 11 November 2025 (UTC) I'm not convinced this will pass SBST, but (as with many subjects following major events) it might be easier to...

WP:SBST. The fact we have to go to a relatively obscure German mac user magazine to find anything on PearC shows just how non notable it is. Per WP:SBST...

individuals, all within the scope of routine sports coverage. Indeed, per WP:SBST, Wikipedia is not a news source: it takes more than just routine news reports...

at the time of their unveiling. None of them is notable by itself, per WP:SBST: “it takes more than just routine news reports about a single event or topic...

with historical significance, because it meshes with WP:NOT#NEWS and WP:SBST in terms of Wikipedia's desire to only record individuals who have historical...

mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material". Also, WP:SBST states that "it does not need to have ongoing coverage". 450zuck (talk) 02:19...

Coolabahapple (talk) 14:11, 14 June 2021 (UTC) as for "Read WP:GNG.", WP:SBST under the Events subsection of the Common circumstances section is interesting:...

reporting (which isn't sufficient to attribute it any notability as per WP:SBST), this dish has no real world presence, not even as a joke dish. In my opinion...

Bono performs; there is not an article about Bono's parents. Indeed, WP:SBST expressly warns that "it takes more than just a short burst of news reports...

discussions outside of NORG and AFD in fact. Some of it kind of falls out of WP:SBST even today: reporting at the local level is almost always routine. I'm not...

certain age or to be WP:SBST, though I would argue it is the latter. Kbbrewster13 (talk) 19:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC) I cited both WP:SBST and WP:SUSTAINED as...

requirements for a subject to be notable Notability, not temporary WP:NTEMP WP:SBST Temporary, brief, short-lived coverage of a subject in reliable sources Notability...

but doesn't mean it needs its own article answer. Guess WP:NOPAGE and WP:SBST would sum up my rationale. Slywriter (talk) 22:46, 3 January 2023 (UTC) Hmm...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails to show adequate notability. WP:SBST may also apply. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 09:11, 24 March 2010 (UTC) See...

Remember, Wikipedia is not a plot-only description of fictional works, and WP:SBST states: "Notability is not predictable: although a topic that does not meet...

article from a brief burst of news articles about a tragic event. Per WP:SBST, Even a large number of news reports that provide no critical analysis of...

of one event by the local CBS station. It does not meet WP:SUSTAINED/WP:SBST. Why? I Ask (talk) 11:30, 16 May 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

not? WikiScrubber (talk) 01:35, 7 March 2009 (UTC) Strong Delete. Fails WP:SBST miserably, not historically notable (WP:NOTNEWS) and extremely unlikely to...

but doesn't mean it needs its own article answer. Guess WP:NOPAGE and WP:SBST would sum up my rationale. Slywriter (talk) 22:46, 3 January 2023 (UTC) Hmm...

Angelina Jolie, etc, but tabloid journalism is not significant coverage (WP:SBST). Surtsicna (talk) 10:44, 10 August 2020 (UTC) Any member of a royal household...

Delete The article has multiple issues and article content fails Wikipedia:SBST, WP:UNDUE and is questionable in other areas too. Pipesmoking Legend (talk)...

websites (mostly blogs and forums) floating in the Internet fall under WP:SBST's "...routine news coverage such as announcements, sports coverage, and tabloid...

debate what's an edge case, where "common sense" would over ride WP:GNG, WP:SBST, or whatever guideline though. Let alone is it the place to re-relitigate...

Ironholds (talk) 02:57, 29 March 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#NEWS, WP:SBST and WP:EVENT with no prejudice against recreation. No evidence of significant...

– (View AfD) A biography of a YouTuber with pretty basic WP:BLP1E and WP:SBST issues. A guy of no other particular note made a YouTube video, in which...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:SBST Routine reporting, such as these covering her death, do not constitute substantial...

is not the relevant notability guideline described in WP:DEL-REASON#8. WP:SBST also characterizes routineness as an event-related criterion, but we're discussing...

notable than before. Most individual incidents violate WP:NOTNEWS and WP:SBST. *** Crotalus *** 19:45, 14 January 2011 (UTC) Weak delete Some of this might...

Angelina Jolie, etc, but tabloid journalism is not significant coverage (WP:SBST). Surtsicna (talk) 10:44, 10 August 2020 (UTC) Any member of a royal household...

Keep: Easily fulfils GNG. The citations are not "routine" coverage as per WP:SBST, WP:NOTNEWS and WP:ROUTINE (which calls press releases, public announcements...

of wikicruft around. Accordingly I'd cite WP:NOTNEWS too, specifically WP:SBST because it's ephemeral. WikiScrubber (talk) 14:26, 7 March 2009 (UTC) The...

Bono performs; there is not an article about Bono's parents. Indeed, WP:SBST expressly warns that "it takes more than just a short burst of news reports...

not just a one time thing. Dream Focus 15:28, 30 January 2010 (UTC) WP:SBST states: "Notability is not predictable: A topic that does not meet the general...

sufficient basis for a topic to have its own stand-alone article." From WP:SBST, part of the notability page. All of these sources are sports coverage and...

Current page doesn't seem to be adding any value and being display as news WP:SBST. Mostly it seems to be created for publicity WP:SPIP. — Preceding unsigned...

"Release" section. Possibly also a case of WP:TOOSOON and WP:SUSTAINED/WP:SBST (the event being the announcement of the stem player). Throast (talk | contribs)...

(UTC) Delete per WP:SBST It makes me feel silly to undo my vote in two consecutive RfD, but I feel (after thoroughly reading it) that SBST applies here. NativeForeigner...

type or an extreme level of detail that don't have lasting impact (from WP:SBST: it takes more than just routine news reports about a single event or topic...

of which are now present to satisfy WP:BAND #9 and poss #12 as well as WP:SBST and WP:GNG - to me speedy keep would seem to be the best option.--Wintonian...

Bono performs; there is not an article about Bono's parents. Indeed, WP:SBST expressly warns that "it takes more than just a short burst of news reports...

everyday usage, in the context specifically of WP:NRVE, WP:ONEEVENT and WP:SBST? I'm afraid you don't get to make up the rules of notability as you go along...

Youtube channel itself. The rest of the sources are either WP:SPIP or WP:SBST. It honestly reads more like a promotional biography for the channel by an...

mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material". Also, WP:SBST states that "it does not need to have ongoing coverage". 450zuck (talk) 02:19...

covered. CTJF83 GoUSA 04:59, 25 February 2010 (UTC) Keep. Per Eastmain and WP:SBST. Gosox(55)(55) 03:40, 25 February 2010 (UTC) Keep. I don't speak French or...

secondary sources; a lot of his news references feel like tabloid (see WP:SBST). If his career picks up and he gets more notable parts, then an article...

It meets the five criteria of WP:GNG. It doesn't perform well against WP:SBST. I found this, but I consider it to be a blog, so I didn't add it in. https://livingbluetx...

mentions e.g. games played, match line-ups, so these don't really pass WP:SBST. Recreate if he ever plays at a fully-pro level. BigDom 14:31, 19 August...

find anything notable using this unashamed search engine test as well as WP:SBST at least because the article is unable to establish self-notability. However...

reasons that "coverage in multiple" is not enough- both WP:BLP1E and WP:SBST give some examples. Otherwise, it's coming back to my feelings on the subject...

24 November 2021 (UTC) Merge per above. References are an example of WP:SBST -- effectively press releases about emplacement and unveiling of the statue...

Coolabahapple (talk) 14:11, 14 June 2021 (UTC) as for "Read WP:GNG.", WP:SBST under the Events subsection of the Common circumstances section is interesting:...

Ironholds (talk) 02:57, 29 March 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#NEWS, WP:SBST and WP:EVENT with no prejudice against recreation. No evidence of significant...

is there anything to suggest it was anything more than temporary per WP:SBST? There's nothing to suggest it was even a huge deal AS it was occuring. I...

part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field. WP:SBST would seem to knock this arguement on the head anyway, since it takes more...

known before or after (obviously, because he unfortunately died). See WP:SBST. --Nlu (talk) 19:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC) Even if Li Jianying is only notable...

Remember, Wikipedia is not a plot-only description of fictional works, and WP:SBST states: "Notability is not predictable: although a topic that does not meet...

coverage is when she runs for election. In my view this is backed by WP:SBST which says "routine news coverage such as press releases, public announcements"...

should be used throughout. Ref 1, 2: Link to Singapore Land Authority All SBST refs: Remove "– SBSTransit" in title and move "SBSTransit" to publisher,...

hasn’t been any sufficient attention or coverage since then. It also fails WP:SBST for the same reason because there isn’t any coverage outside of these events...

com as an RS for unreleased material, WP:NALBUM, WP:N, WP:NRVE, WP:RS, WP:SBST and WP:GNG. PopMusicBuff talk 22:30, 30 August 2009 (UTC) If the general...

SportingFlyer T·C 09:54, 26 June 2023 (UTC) What is routine coverage? WP:SBST, a subsection of our main notability guideline, says this: "For example,...

checkboxes thanks to in-depth coverage from gold-standard reliable sources. WP:SBST gives additional guidance, and there are sources used here that contain coverage...

someone explain to me why this is considered useless, and why it needs the sbst: ? Typing the name of a language once is faster than typing it twice, and...

(talk) 17:04, 10 March 2009 (UTC) I think we're talking at cross-purposes. WP:SBST is relevant here. The incident itself falls foul of this guideline, but a...

everyday usage, in the context specifically of WP:NRVE, WP:ONEEVENT and WP:SBST? I'm afraid you don't get to make up the rules of notability as you go along...

(talk) 17:04, 10 March 2009 (UTC) I think we're talking at cross-purposes. WP:SBST is relevant here. The incident itself falls foul of this guideline, but a...

information. TFD (talk) 15:22, 27 January 2022 (UTC) My thoughts: see WP:SBST. Wikipedia's main policy objective is to provide content with reliable, high...

as the best sources in this discussion seem like straightforward fails of SBST. Alpha3031 (t • c) 12:30, 6 December 2024 (UTC) Redirect per above discussion...

possible) as it seems an objective test has emerged from this discussion: WP:SBST (Short Burst of Stories Test): Wikipedia is not a news source: it takes more...

Those articles I think tend to also run afoul of WP:WHOSWHO. And from WP:SBST: Even a large number of news reports that provide no critical analysis of...

process[6] to the point it looks like it's just routine local event reporting (WP:SBST). When you look at past sources like that, they don't make any mention of...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable events. I believe it fails WP:SBST. Equine-man (talk) 19:42, 3 November 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

your first, second, and fourth sources are tabloid coverage, and per WP:SBST, tabloid journalism is not significant coverage. The third source is a Q&A...

is derived outside of generic run of the mill crime content, this is a WP:SBST at the moment despite efforts to astroturf it. Koncorde (talk) 19:35, 7 September...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable events, fails WP:SBST. Equine-man (talk) 19:57, 3 November 2025 (UTC) Comment @Therealbrettcooper:...

should be used throughout. Ref 1, 2: Link to Singapore Land Authority All SBST refs: Remove "– SBSTransit" in title and move "SBSTransit" to publisher,...

coverage is limited to tabloid journalism and thus not WP:SIGCOV per WP:SBST. Proposing a redirect to List of programmes broadcast by Zee Tamil (India)...

still stands. Ravensfire (talk) 16:52, 22 July 2024 (UTC) Delete. Per WP:SBST, "tabloid journalism is not significant coverage," and that's what this WP:REFBOMB...

close to a clear and unambiguous violation of WP:NOTNEWS and the derived WP:SBST as one is likely to get (except perhaps the last BIO-related AFD I participated...

it is not going to become notable. See WP:NSUSTAINED and particularly WP:SBST: Even a large number of news reports that provide no critical analysis of...

coverage is sufficient. --Cyfal (talk) 17:31, 14 July 2024 (UTC) See WP:SBST: "tabloid journalism is not significant coverage." That means there is insufficient...

coverage is limited to WP:PRIMARYSOURCES and tabloid coverage disallowed per WP:SBST. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:39, 9 August 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

throughout the article (significance??), the rest is about the specific event (WP:SBST? It probably falls under it's own criteria of WP:EVENT which it doesn't pass)...

Unsosctent (talk) 08:05, 11 November 2025 (UTC) I'm not convinced this will pass SBST, but (as with many subjects following major events) it might be easier to...

Furthermore, this is the recording and production of the event itself, so WP:SBST and/or WP:EVENT, including WP:EVENTCRIT and WP:COVERAGE, should apply as...

what in-depth coverage exists appears to be tabloid coverage, which, per WP:SBST is not WP:SIGCOV. Other sources appear to be WP:INTERVIEWs and thus ineligible...

WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS of the series (and is otherwise excluded as SIGCOV under WP:SBST). My WP:BEFORE search turns up nothing else beyond a WP:PRESSRELEASE, and...

over a sufficiently significant period of time, so the question is, does SBST apply here? Alpha3031 (t • c) 13:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC) The sources provide...

coverage is routine or not, but the part of WP:N that covers routineness is WP:SBST. Nonprofit educational institutions could indeed be retained under GNG. Alpha3031...

appear to themselves understand the evaluation of routine coverage (e.g. WP:SBST) especially as typically applied to political figures. I would tend to agree...

of Bhatia is mostly incidental as part of routine business coverage (WP:SBST/CORPROUTINE). Does not meet WP:BASIC, and should also be deleted per WP:NOTRESUME...

person didn't do anything notable except one event, which contradicts WP:SBST. I am sorry to admit that I suspect the listed coverage to be WP:SPIP. Delete...

a notable film). The available sources are all tabloid coverage under WP:SBST and/or of questionable reliability under WP:NEWSORGINDIA. Repeatedly recreated...

WP:CHURNALISM, WP:INTERVIEWS and tabloid coverage excluded as WP:SIGCOV under WP:SBST. I found only one example of WP:SIGCOV qualifying toward notability (in the...

mind that tabloid journalism is not considered significant coverage per WP:SBST. The the rest of the sourcing is mainly to the same questionable sources...

individuals, all within the scope of routine sports coverage. Indeed, per WP:SBST, Wikipedia is not a news source: it takes more than just routine news reports...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) BLP1E. Fails GNG WP:SBST, WP:EVENTS, WP:CRIME (no "persistent coverage of the event in reliable secondary...

mention 10) Routine coverage 11) Passing mention And per WP:SIGCOV and WP:SBST, passing mentions and routine coverage don't count towards notability. Online...

state that tabloid journalism is not considered significant coverage per WP:SBST. A few items are cited to Arcadia Pub which publishes the Images of America...

voting keep based on news announcements, just want to point out that WP:SBST states that routine news reports are not significant coverage, even a large...

article are tabloid coverage of his engagement (excluded for notability per WP:SBST) and WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS. I couldn't find any other qualifying WP:SIGCOV in...

as well as a handful of tabloid items disallowed for notability under WP:SBST. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:53, 22 July 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

mentions seem to be routine coverage surrounding the announcement, excluded by SBST. No objection to redirect though, I just didn't want to BLAR since I anticipated...

most of the coverage of the subject could be considered as fitting under WP:SBST, which therefore renders the page as unwarranted as a standalone article...

mentions (example), and/or tabloid coverage disallowed for notability per WP:SBST (example). Nothing qualifying turned up in WP:BEFORE search. Dclemens1971...

in WalesOnline; the rest is tabloid coverage excluded as SIGCOV under WP:SBST, or it's in unreliable sources like Forbes contributors. Dclemens1971 (talk)...

at the article: the coverage consists either of tabloid coverage (see WP:SBST) or WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs; no significant coverage and thus no pass of WP:GNG...

WP:BEFORE search, are tabloid articles which do not count as WP:SIGCOV per WP:SBST. Given how much of this article is unsourced negative content which I removed...

"press releases [...] are not valid routes to an encyclopedia article", WP:SBST "routine news coverage such as press releases [...] is not significant coverage"...

is not the relevant notability guideline described in WP:DEL-REASON#8. WP:SBST also characterizes routineness as an event-related criterion, but we're discussing...

mentioned the subject was largely routine, alongside some press releases (WP:SBST and WP:NOTPROMO). I did not find significant converge that addresses the...

model is entirely limited to tabloid news, which is not WP:SIGCOV under WP:SBST, and to primary sources. She appears to promote herself as Miss Croatia,...

such coverage, only some of it barely mention the candidate's slogan. Fails SBST by a wide margin. Alpha3031 (t • c) 11:43, 4 January 2026 (UTC) Note: This...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTBROCHURE and WP:SBST. Coverage largely lacks significant analysis. Current article is thus essentially...

WP:ROUTINE match coverage. The main notability guideline's event section WP:SBST addresses this by saying: Even a large number of news reports that provide...

These sources cover the exact same information. Wikipedia is not news. WP:SBST: Even a large number of news reports that provide no critical analysis of...

sports "rivalry" articles. The main notability guideline's event section WP:SBST addresses this by saying: Even a large number of news reports that provide...

coverage is when she runs for election. In my view this is backed by WP:SBST which says "routine news coverage such as press releases, public announcements"...

hasn’t been any sufficient attention or coverage since then. It also fails WP:SBST for the same reason because there isn’t any coverage outside of these events...

at the time of their unveiling. None of them is notable by itself, per WP:SBST: “it takes more than just routine news reports about a single event or topic...

him ([20], [21], [22]) Tabloid journalism ineligible as WP:SIGCOV per WP:SBST ([23]) An apparent piece of WP:SIGCOV ([24]) but on a promotional site that...

Soap Dish, People), which is disallowed for establishing notability per WP:SBST. The remaining sources are limited to: WP:ROUTINE coverage in WP:TRADES publication...

el campeador talk 12:43, 22 June 2023 (UTC) What is routine coverage? WP:SBST, a subsection of our main notability guideline, says this: "For example,...

Blissfulclarity (talk) 14:58, 12 December 2024 (UTC) Delete. Tragic incident. But WP:SBST. BenTanXiaoMing (talk) 17:47, 11 December 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

WP:SIGCOV, no sources address "the topic directly and in detail". Also WP:SBST, since there is little more than routine journalism discussing the topic...

process[25] to the point it looks like it's just routine local event reporting (WP:SBST). When you look at past sources like that, they don't make any mention of...

checkboxes thanks to in-depth coverage from gold-standard reliable sources. WP:SBST gives additional guidance, and there are sources used here that contain coverage...

Those articles I think tend to also run afoul of WP:WHOSWHO. And from WP:SBST: Even a large number of news reports that provide no critical analysis of...

AFC reviewer here. ChrysGalley (talk) 08:17, 20 April 2026 (UTC) Per WP:SBST: Even a large number of news reports that provide no critical analysis of...

been able to find, and they all fail the test set out at WP:ROUTINE / WP:SBST, even if editors consider the event itself a significant one. The AP article...

as the best sources in this discussion seem like straightforward fails of SBST. Alpha3031 (t • c) 12:30, 6 December 2024 (UTC) Redirect per above discussion...

Lo dicono a Signa. 20:44, 30 January 2026 (UTC) Delete: WP:NOTNEWS and WP:SBST. The event was a tragedy, and certainly notable on a personal level but not...

WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS, or gossip/tabloid sources that do not contribute to notability per WP:SBST. No WP:SIGCOV in secondary, independent, reliable sources. Contested PROD...

the sources are tabloid coverage that is not considered WP:SIGCOV per WP:SBST ([1], [2], [3]); are WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS ([4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SBST and WP:GNG. While the shooting is sad and unfortunate, it also is a WP:INHERENT...

sources, tabloids, and podcasts. I can not find any RS covering it. See WP:SBST" Cpotisch (talk) 21:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC) Automated comment: This AfD...

SportingFlyer T·C 09:54, 26 June 2023 (UTC) What is routine coverage? WP:SBST, a subsection of our main notability guideline, says this: "For example,...

2024 (UTC) Delete. Coverage consists either of tabloid coverage (see WP:SBST) or WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs; no significant coverage. Dclemens1971 (talk) 11:07...

You:Bite 12:18, 3 August 2023 (UTC) On initial review this seems to badly fail SBST. Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:16, 3 August 2023 (UTC) I've reviewed the few articles...

is derived outside of generic run of the mill crime content, this is a WP:SBST at the moment despite efforts to astroturf it. Koncorde (talk) 19:35, 7 September...

appear to themselves understand the evaluation of routine coverage (e.g. WP:SBST) especially as typically applied to political figures. I would tend to agree...