Search Results: Wikipedia:Reliable Sources Noticeboard
Redirect to:
Wikipedia:Reliable sources
Rabu, 2026-05-27 09:07:24Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (science)
Rabu, 2026-05-20 02:07:20See also: Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, Wikipedia:No original research, and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) Wikipedia's science...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable source examples
Jumat, 2025-10-03 09:37:23page provides examples of what editors on Wikipedia have assessed to be a reliable source. The advice is not, and cannot be, comprehensive, and should be...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (law)
Minggu, 2026-04-12 22:50:18Information about the law should be based on reliable, third-party published secondary sources. Law sources such as books about laws and articles about...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (history)
Sabtu, 2024-10-26 03:09:08towards guidelines for History-related articles equivalent to those about reliable sources for medical articles. History articles should always comply with...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
Sabtu, 2026-06-06 21:30:31questions regarding Omniglot. Question 1: Is Omniglot a reliable source? Option Q1.1: Generally reliable for factual information Option Q1.2: Unclear or additional...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 17:23:45Wikipedia biomedical editing Editing for medical experts Reliable sources FAQ Why MEDRS? Biomedical information Manual of style Conflicts of interest Plain...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources and undue weight
Kamis, 2025-02-06 17:38:17subject is more reliable when writing about that subject than when writing about another. For example, a biologist is more reliable when writing about...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/Reliable sources
Minggu, 2026-05-03 02:29:04The WikiProject College football reliable sources essay aims to define what does and does not constitute a reliable source in the world of college football...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Cost
Minggu, 2025-10-05 01:58:16Reliable sources must be able to be verified. This does not mean that any particular person at any given moment must be capable of verifying them. Verifiable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:You are not a reliable source
Sabtu, 2025-04-26 11:33:39not a reliable source for Wikipedia content. The reverse is also true, you are not a reliable source for removal of content supported by a reliable source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Notability of reliable sources
Jumat, 2026-05-01 21:30:51Notability of reliable sources is the application of Wikipedia's rules on WP:Notability to the WP:Reliable sources which Wikipedia editors cite. This document...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources
Kamis, 2026-05-28 07:02:08consolidates links to the most in-depth and recent discussions from the reliable sources noticeboard and elsewhere on Wikipedia. Context matters tremendously...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/Reliable sources
Senin, 2026-06-01 01:03:05verdicts on whether they are reliable. Sources deemed unreliable on here should generally not be used. See also Wikipedia:Reliable sources for site-wide guidelines...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)/FAQ
Jumat, 2026-02-13 12:48:37as the rest of Wikipedia. Examples of this include the requirement for reliable sources and the preference for secondary sources over primary sources....
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources checklist
Kamis, 2023-11-30 19:19:36every statement, and no source is always reliable for any statement. A source can only be considered reliable when the source's qualities are compared...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Flaws
Sabtu, 2026-05-16 18:44:42on phrases like "reliable X," "common Y," or a mushy definition of fact. These phrases could be defined in the same way that "reliable source" has been...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Timeline Tracer/Reliable sources
Minggu, 2022-08-14 21:18:59Welcome to the WikiProject Timeline Tracer Reliable Sources Information This is a sub/page of WikiProject Timeline Tracer Shortcut WP:TIMETRSWP:TIMETRS...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Economics/Reliable sources and weight
Selasa, 2025-11-18 08:54:26economic theories and viewpoints presented to reliable, published sources. We should strive to use reliable sources, which according to Sources are peer-reviewed...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable South African Sources
Selasa, 2025-09-16 10:15:40of commentary and analysis so be alert for that. Otherwise found to be reliable. Has been accused of anti-EFF bias by the EFF due to its coverage of corruption...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Uses
Rabu, 2025-11-19 01:02:58{{WP:RSPUSESWP:RSPUSES}} This template displays the "Uses" table cell at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. This template accepts any number of optional...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 390
Senin, 2022-12-05 11:07:53by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources. Newsmax has been judged not a reliable source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Status
Rabu, 2025-11-19 01:02:54Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. Note: You should use the shortcut {{Wikipedia:RSPSTATUS}} or full template path {{Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:No reliable sources, no verifiability, no article
Senin, 2023-09-18 17:21:46To ensure verifiability, the presence of cited reliable sources in articles is non-negotiable. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and we are encyclopedists...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Last
Rabu, 2025-11-19 01:02:50Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. Note: You should use the shortcut {{Wikipedia:RSPLAST}} or the full template path {{Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration/Links to reliable sources discussions
Kamis, 2023-06-22 16:37:58Collaboration/Links to reliable sources discussions provides Links to Specific Source Discussions and Links to General Issues Discussions of reliable sources that...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 40
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 03:38:23Wikiproject:Spam would be welcome. With specific regard to it being a reliable source, it is very like a wiki. Anyone can start a memorial to a person...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Online reliable sources
Sabtu, 2026-06-06 20:44:59WP:A&M/SWP:A&M/S WP:A&M/IWP:A&M/I Articles related to anime and manga need reliable sources like any other Wikipedia article—content must be verifiable. However...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:What is a reliable source?
Rabu, 2025-12-10 23:17:01A reliable source is one that presents a well-reasoned theory or argument supported by strong evidence. Reliable sources include scholarly, peer-reviewed...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 153
Jumat, 2022-05-20 15:16:19where an editor suggests that maps are inherently more reliable than other formats of information for geographical articles - in other...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 361
Jumat, 2025-11-21 01:46:51The RFC at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 337#Jewish_Chronicle found "a weak consensus that it's generally reliable" for material related...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 320
Selasa, 2023-08-22 07:45:43Sean Michael Kyer. I'm curious if the site itself would be considered reliable or if it would be considered ineligible since the site itself appears to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 160
Kamis, 2023-03-16 19:37:07a reliable source for much of anything.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:04, 16 November 2013 (UTC) The Huffington Post passes as a WP:Reliable source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 393
Selasa, 2025-11-18 01:33:30reached follows. In short, there is a consensus that the The Economist is reliable for trans topics. The consensus is overwhelming when solely accounting...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 360
Selasa, 2023-03-14 22:05:23Can the Albanian historian Pëllumb Xhufi be considered a reliable source for the purposes of the article Petros Lantzas? In that article, several users...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 10
Minggu, 2023-12-17 01:01:39he doesn't need any sources, but that I am the one who needs to look up reliable sources contradicting him, if I want to remove these uncited statements...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 20
Minggu, 2023-12-17 01:01:42lewrockwell.com isn't a reliable source. Lew Rockwell may be a reliable source, or other authors on there. But lewrockwell.com is not reliable. Protonk (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 284
Minggu, 2026-02-22 08:25:23(talk) 03:56, 14 January 2020 (UTC) I see you're not claiming there's a reliable source stating that particular claim - is there one? I looked and couldn't...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 1
Senin, 2023-04-03 12:07:41should not normally be used as sources.' from WP:ATT/FAQ: 'Are weblogs reliable sources?' section: In most cases, no. Most weblogs ("blogs"), especially...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 394
Kamis, 2023-01-12 11:17:40the war Kubijovyč settled in the West. Is the Encyclopedia of Ukraine a reliable source for WW2 history? Example: I’ll present you an article about Ukrainian...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 80
Minggu, 2024-11-17 19:27:42sure it i used elsewhere. I don't personally consider the CIA factbook a reliable source for demographics in Academic contexts and my gut instinct is that...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 380
Senin, 2025-03-03 23:35:01as a reference/source and would like to know if it can be considered as reliable. I appreciate that it is no longer published, probably had low circulation...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/rewrite
Sabtu, 2019-06-15 02:50:07stance. Some sources are more reliable than others. Sources that are more reliable are preferred over those that are less reliable. However, reliability is...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Status/doc
Senin, 2024-07-01 07:25:55Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. Note: You should use the shortcut {{Wikipedia:RSPSTATUS}} or full template path {{Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 395
Sabtu, 2023-12-23 01:01:11L. Mukhopadhyay" and written by Uma Mukherjee (credentials unknown) is reliable for a WP:EXCEPTIONAL claim being made here. The misinformation is question...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 17
Selasa, 2025-09-23 22:33:34the reliability of Hollywood media sources, it hardly sounds the most reliable source to me particularly since what it says is "But I heard over the weekend...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Arena Football League/Reliable Sources
Selasa, 2026-04-14 23:18:38WikiProject Arena Football League Reliable Sources guidelines aim to define what does and does not constitute a reliable source in the world of arena football...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 3
Minggu, 2024-10-20 04:06:23Shibli Nomani's Sirat an-Nabi (The Life of the Prophet [ Muhammad ]) a reliable source for the life of Muhammad? I believe the answer is yes. Nomani was...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 84
Kamis, 2024-10-17 05:45:47Unification Church values, this "encyclopedia" should never be considered a reliable source of information. There may be other articles that cite the New World...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 30
Senin, 2023-04-03 15:57:54sources as 'more reliable' or 'less reliable'. A source is either considered reliable for a particular citation, or not. When reliable sources contradict...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 34
Selasa, 2023-02-21 11:48:56nearly unanimous that it is not a reliable source. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 21:15, 5 May 2009 (UTC) Yup. WND, not a reliable source. Protonk (talk) 21:23,...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Uses/doc
Kamis, 2024-07-04 00:05:59{{WP:RSPUSESWP:RSPUSES}} This template displays the "Uses" table cell at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. This template accepts any number of optional...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Don't cite Wikipedia on Wikipedia
Sabtu, 2026-05-23 01:46:02Wikipedia articles; see WP:CIRCULAR for guidance. Wikipedia pages often cite reliable secondary sources that vet data from primary sources. If the information...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 18
Minggu, 2023-12-17 01:01:50Would these websites be considered reliable sources? Specifically in regards to Linux-related topics? Can they be used to establish notability and critical...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 2
Senin, 2024-10-14 02:04:18biography of a living person? Fundamentally, I want to know: is this a reliable source? --Ssbohio 02:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC) Can you give us a link to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 26
Sabtu, 2023-01-28 23:41:17comes from here. I was wondering if the SiteAdvisor blog can be used as a reliable source for including Last Measure in the list of examples of shock sites...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 392
Kamis, 2023-01-05 22:39:45follows. Short answer: there is an affirmative consensus that The Times is reliable regarding transgender/transsexual topics. Rather than repeating myself...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 220
Minggu, 2026-03-08 02:11:21Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 255#2nd RfC: The Daily Mail --Guy Macon (talk) 16:39, 25 January 2019 (UTC) Also see: Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 9
Kamis, 2026-04-16 19:35:47to distinguish between the different Who's Who publications): Is it a reliable source? Can it be used to establish notability? In general or under special...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 150
Sabtu, 2026-01-24 08:14:20third posting has been reported by at least three sources I believe to be reliable: [1] This is an op-ed column in Forbes magazine. Larry Bell, according...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 22
Sabtu, 2023-04-08 00:28:40recently on the BLP/N. User:Cirt is contending that Anson Shupe is not a reliable source for information on the Jason Scott case. The basis of this claim...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 14
Selasa, 2025-09-23 21:51:34[6] The admin mentioned that the Nippon News Network, and Oricon are not reliable sources, and that GOO is perhaps a forum or blog! How are these references...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 24
Rabu, 2023-03-15 11:33:42of this revert by User:RetroS1mone, I'd like to hear opinions on the reliablity of this institute's website as a source for listing Florence Nightingale...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 13
Minggu, 2023-12-17 01:02:04sources were notable but not reliable to be used for facts. Therefore they should be used wherever they are quoted by a reliable third party, and their views...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 4
Minggu, 2023-12-17 01:01:54the newspaper is reliable depends on how it is used. It is not a reliable source in that everything it says is true, but it is a reliable source for that...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 175
Sabtu, 2026-03-07 05:22:11Are this book (p. 223) and this document (section 17) reliable sources for the statement that the document "warned bishops to be on guard against, and...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 16
Minggu, 2023-12-17 01:01:47is the source reliable? Given that the estimates are so far off the 2001 Census figures, I'm doubtful about whether they're reliable. Cordless Larry...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 27
Kamis, 2026-04-16 19:38:46available in the internet. So can the Mariners website be considered a reliable source? — Bellhalla (talk) 18:21, 14 January 2009 (UTC) Probably not. I...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 25
Sabtu, 2023-01-28 23:41:22native Dutch speaker and a doctor. Also, I wouldn't consider it a medically reliable source unless published in a peer-reviewed journal. What was the oversight...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Last/doc
Kamis, 2025-10-09 05:14:54Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. Note: You should use the shortcut {{Wikipedia:RSPLAST}} or the full template path {{Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 32
Minggu, 2025-03-30 01:27:35Is the Maryland Online Encyclopedia a reliable source? It claims to be a "a joint project of the Maryland Historical Society, the Maryland Humanities Council...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 56
Senin, 2025-05-19 22:56:05CyrilThePig4 (talk) 13:46, 6 February 2010 (UTC) Sounds like it may be reliable, although it's hard to tell with that small snippet. I think you have an...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 149
Jumat, 2023-08-11 10:09:51I am having some trouble verifying that TVAddict.com is reliable. Have anyone else had questions about this source? - Jack Sebastian (talk) 04:08, 6 May...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 35
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:42:21question from the Race in hip hop article. I'm guessing they're not too reliable, but does that mean everything from them should be considered just a rumor...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 188
Kamis, 2025-08-28 22:00:41head. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 2#Ancestory.com and USsearch? --September 2007 Not reliable Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 37
Selasa, 2024-09-03 05:15:35Is this site reliable enough to support this edit, or is it just a forum/blog? Nightscream (talk) 02:05, 15 June 2009 (UTC) Anyone? Nightscream (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 207
Rabu, 2025-09-24 04:33:27be reliable. As to the reliability issue (and just the reliability issue) I would place it on the reliable side of the line. Not "highly reliable" .....
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 385
Rabu, 2025-09-24 20:47:35result reaffirms Fox News's existing "marginally reliable" status—that is, neither "generally reliable" nor "generally unreliable". This RfC establishes...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 23
Senin, 2023-01-30 15:48:58references to it, some of which will be about h2g2, but some using it as a reliable source. I'm wondering if this has been looked at before, since it seems...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Board and table games/Sources
Senin, 2026-03-23 07:01:09Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. For accessing sources, see also Wikipedia:WikiProject_Board_and_table_games/Resources#Reliable_reference_archive....
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 163
Senin, 2025-01-20 09:37:50Is the following source reliable? Source: Glasenapp, Helmuth von (1999). Jainism: An Indian Religion of Salvation. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 494. ISBN 978-81-208-1376-2...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything
Minggu, 2026-05-03 15:11:03in-depth description. The significant coverage should be in sources that are reliable. Usually this means that the publisher has a reputation for fact checking...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 97
Sabtu, 2025-03-08 21:30:53FAC reviewers are of the opinion that Yahoo blogs, being blogs, are not reliable. I oppose the viewpoint because these are not just some random blogspot...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 88
Rabu, 2025-09-24 04:39:25just a press release, and is professionally written. So my take is its a reliable source. Lack of a named author shouldn't matter; a lot of newspaper coverage...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources for software articles
Jumat, 2023-12-22 07:59:39The Wikipedia articles should rely on and reference reliable sources. Being an essay, this document provides a commentary on application of corresponding...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 50
Jumat, 2023-03-10 18:43:51size that makes it reliable/unreliable. Scientology is quite large. It's not a reliable source. The reason the ALA is a reliable source for the map is...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 15
Minggu, 2023-12-17 01:02:00do not count as reliable sources. I could not find anything in WP:RS, WP:N, WP:CORP that specify that trade journals as not reliable sources. I realize...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 90
Rabu, 2023-03-08 17:42:21Is this article in Commentary magazine reliable for the idea that the UN failed to condemn a Lebanese army attack on a Palestinian refugee camp? I believe...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 287
Sabtu, 2023-07-22 14:45:24considered reliable when produced by an established expert on the subject matter, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 45
Sabtu, 2024-12-21 04:11:16(UTC) Source is a reliable source for Social Liberalism. To improve the article, improve "reliable source" to "high quality reliable source" by citing...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 58
Sabtu, 2025-08-02 14:50:20Resolved Is ListOwn a reliable source for the birth info of entertainers? Nightscream (talk) 18:19, 18 February 2010 (UTC) I can't imagine it being accepted...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 104
Kamis, 2023-03-16 22:51:03in Central Equatoria state. I suggest that you update the web based on reliable source of infromation from our Central Equatoria State Government Secretariat...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 41
Selasa, 2025-09-23 21:06:23Resolved Is this source a reliable source for the BLP on Howard Bloom? The page indicates that it's a social network. Does that mean Bloom himself wrote...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 250
Senin, 2022-05-16 12:51:37evaluating reliable sources, but to me the same ways I would evaluate if a source is reliable in my writing is one it would be deemed reliable from an encyclopedic...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 170
Sabtu, 2023-01-28 23:42:26magazine is generally WP:Reliable for WP:BLPs. Saying that People magazine is not always reliable? No media source is always reliable. Many scholarly sources...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 53
Jumat, 2023-03-03 09:03:14the only book by this publisher. I believe that it should be considered reliable. In support of this belief, industry expert John Molinaro (a regular columnist...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 63
Senin, 2025-01-20 16:06:06Dollywood.com does turn out to be a non-reliable source, would it be okay to use it temporarily until more reliable sources can be found? Thanks, Donatrip...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 244
Minggu, 2026-05-17 22:20:291979 in Iran and the author cites infoplease.com as the source. Is it reliable enough? I checked other sources; this one says: "Total: Since 1979 over...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 294
Jumat, 2026-02-13 03:04:15Is the website for History generally reliable? I'm not talking about ancient aliens stuff, but information posted on their website such as this? Back in...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Knowledge gaps in women's health/Reliable sources
Senin, 2023-03-06 20:29:11Given below is the list of some reliable sources related to women's health. For resources related to women's health, please go to The Wikipedia Library...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 281
Minggu, 2024-06-30 06:11:21(UTC) Generally reliable per extremely strong WP:USEBYOTHERS; the Daily Beast is generally treated as a reliable source by most other reliable sources out...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 11
Minggu, 2023-12-17 01:02:02format it seems to be a personal website/blog ... as such it would not be reliable. Blueboar (talk) 13:41, 14 April 2008 (UTC) Dsmurat has posted a second...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 8
Jumat, 2024-02-16 21:27:32Query: To what degree are Polemic and Apologetic sources considered "Reliable Sources"? In particular: Secular press sources will gladly publish cherry-picking...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 172
Minggu, 2026-02-08 23:54:02(Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_26#Masters_Theses, Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_107#Theses, Wikipedia:Reliable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 288
Sabtu, 2023-07-22 14:44:13search through the archives shows that New Scientist is indeed considered a reliable source. It seems to me that there should be no problem using New Scientist...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 179
Sabtu, 2023-12-30 14:34:33Dreamstate (talk) 22:44, 24 October 2014 (UTC) As to whether the book is a reliable source, it is published by Ktav Publishing House, a publisher of children's...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 260
Minggu, 2022-03-27 01:56:45now sufficient to establish notability, and can they ever be used as "reliable sources" for claims of fact? The AfD has devolved into clear WP:DOXING...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 33
Selasa, 2023-02-21 13:18:23reliable as any other news agency and is a reliable source in general therefore a reliable source this time and everytime", they MUST be a reliable source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 19
Sabtu, 2025-08-02 14:56:32little unclear as to whether any of these would meet Wikipedia criteria as reliable or notable sources or "original research". According to WP:V "Special cases...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 122
Jumat, 2023-03-03 05:33:21cite attacks then yes.Lihaas (talk) 21:18, 1 May 2012 (UTC) No source is reliable for everything, be more specific. You want to ask something like, Is "source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources
Senin, 2026-06-01 03:15:20WP:VG/RSWP:VG/RS WP:GAMESOURCESWP:GAMESOURCES Articles related to video games need reliable sources like any other Wikipedia article—content must be verifiable. Due...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 60
Senin, 2025-08-11 08:08:10legitimate than their fellow members, which would normally also be considered reliable sources. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:08, 6 March 2010 (UTC) The East Bay...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 38
Kamis, 2026-04-16 19:39:51of that editor and cannot be used to overrule what reliable sources say, provided they are reliably cited. DreamGuy (talk) 11:37, 1 July 2009 (UTC) A dispute...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 91
Kamis, 2026-03-05 01:43:31Whitepaw a reliable source? B. Is ICorrect.com a reliable source in general? -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 09:17, 15 March 2011 (UTC) It's not a reliable source because...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 115
Sabtu, 2023-01-28 23:43:47be in place to consider a networked video (e.g. YouTube) to be a good, reliable, verifiable source of information? Squish7 (talk) 02:38, 3 January 2012...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 5
Minggu, 2023-12-17 01:02:06Resolved Is Robert Spencer a reliable source in the field of Islam? He is the author of The Truth About Muhammad: Founder of the World's Most Intolerant...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 47
Senin, 2026-03-02 22:23:25IS wikileaks a reliable source? They accept user uploads, but they do appear to have some sort of vetting process. Sephiroth storm (talk) 14:14, 16 October...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 215
Sabtu, 2025-08-02 12:41:40source for #2. - jc37 22:43, 17 November 2016 (UTC) 1. Is PolitiFact [1] a reliable source for reporting the veracity of statements made by political candidates...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 85
Minggu, 2024-10-20 08:42:25opinion piece by a member of the Humanist Society of New South Wales Inc. a reliable source? It is being used as a source in the Distributism article to verify...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 82
Kamis, 2024-02-15 19:52:18these qualify as reliable sources. I should think that there are published governmental surveys, or other published sources that are reliable sources for this...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 247
Sabtu, 2026-01-24 13:40:45be reliable for some specific kinds of content. It is not reliable for any WP:Biomedical information per WP:MEDRS and is unlikely to be reliable for...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 251
Minggu, 2021-10-31 16:23:18Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_190#CoinDesk Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_236#CoinDesk Wikipedia:Reliable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 189
Rabu, 2026-02-25 14:32:22If a site it reliable, it is generally reliable. If not, then not. No need to check each time. All Music is generally considered a reliable source. Sundazed...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 31
Senin, 2024-11-18 07:19:43authors are not reliable. -Atmoz (talk) 17:36, 19 March 2009 (UTC) A reliable source that may be cited in Wikipedia articles is in itself reliable; a Wikipedia...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 203
Minggu, 2024-10-20 07:38:39Comic-Con talking about his experience making a movie is every bit as reliable as him doing so on a DVD commentary). And there's also zero doubt that...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 46
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:41:59be expected of anyone who could possibly be a reliable source on this. If not, what would be a reliable source to explain what "outlaw motorcycle club"...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 70
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:41:21don't think we typically refer to sources as more or less reliable, just reliable or not reliable. In this situation, we would probably prefer editors use...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 368
Jumat, 2022-03-25 21:30:53DR. APARNITA BHATTACHARJEE is reliable? It is also used as a reference here. please help me to Identify is it reliable or not for caste-related articles...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 102
Kamis, 2023-07-27 21:36:09The prompting article page at the Daily Dot is also here. Is this site reliable is the basic question i'm asking, obviously? They were discussed on Gigaom...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 39
Minggu, 2026-02-22 10:06:43the truth. Meowy 16:13, 14 July 2009 (UTC) Well... RT as a whole is a reliable source under our rules... but the specific web page being cited seems to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 68
Senin, 2025-01-20 17:52:29view is the website is reliable but not everything in there is necessarily reliable. Not everything in The New York Times, a reliable source, may be used...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 61
Jumat, 2025-02-28 05:27:43Is Sol Bellel, author of knickerbockervillage.blogspot.com a reliable source? An author is trying to use this blog posting to identify the faces carved...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 101
Jumat, 2023-03-03 02:29:55not truth after all). Per WP:RS a reliable source is reliable for what is non-controversially "true", it can be reliable for parts and not the whole; a source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 55
Kamis, 2026-04-16 19:41:20release here)? --Sceptic from Ashdod (talk) 13:51, 31 January 2010 (UTC) Reliable if specifically attributed to the ECLJ. The ECLJ is an offshoot of the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 140
Minggu, 2026-04-19 18:09:26article? Are there nuances of language that we should be aware of? Is is reliable? Self-published? Can we find out anything about the author? etc. Blueboar...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 171
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:46:19not be the most reliable source (and I have no problem with favoring a more reliable source, if one is available)... but it is a reliable source for the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 335
Minggu, 2021-08-29 17:48:15Wikipedia. IMO it's option 2: generally reliable. Option 1: Reliable. Option 2: Generally reliable Option 3: Not reliable. Can somebody please merge this into...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 262
Minggu, 2022-05-01 12:29:40I will often encounter Telesur as a source. My question is, is Telesur reliable? ----ZiaLater (talk) 12:30, 1 February 2019 (UTC) In past discussions,...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 343
Rabu, 2025-09-24 02:46:43is "disgraced" due to the UNESCWA retraction, but I have not seen any reliable source making such a claim. Onceinawhile (talk) 21:11, 22 May 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 270
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 03:36:59WP:RSP? Thanks, --SVTCobra 23:55, 2 July 2019 (UTC) Option 1: Generally reliable for factual reporting Option 2: Unclear or additional considerations apply...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Verifiability
Kamis, 2026-06-04 01:02:34verifiability means that people can check that facts or claims correspond to reliable sources. Wikipedia's content is determined by published information rather...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 29
Jumat, 2023-03-03 02:31:18TVSquad is a reliable source. I did a bit of research on this a while back at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 2#TV Squad as a reliable source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 293
Sabtu, 2026-03-07 23:11:43— Newslinger talk 13:09, 22 April 2020 (UTC) This is not a reliable source, at all. We have a good compilation of reliable sources at Jihad Watch supporting the characterization...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 110
Kamis, 2024-02-22 06:03:39clear-cut consensus that Pravda is not reliable. Has there ever been a consensus that Pravda is not a reliable source? Geo Swan (talk) 02:16, 20 November...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Venezuela/Reliable and unreliable sources
Sabtu, 2025-12-27 21:34:56neighboring nations, several using citizen journalism, are seen as more reliable for Venezuela-specific reports. Venezuela was listed in the 2015 Press...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 21
Minggu, 2023-12-17 01:02:14-library science is not a reliable source in this respect [1] claims Relata refero regarding Denial of the Ukrainian famine (1933) according to: Evolution...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 130
Selasa, 2025-09-23 22:16:44Is this a "primary source" which ought to be avoided - and use reliable secondary sources in vast preference? It looks like Paul Ryan is having all his...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 128
Kamis, 2023-03-09 19:54:31reference - http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=batman3.htm'. Is this website reliable? Floating Boat A boat that can float! 09:58, 25 July 2012 (UTC) In general...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 65
Selasa, 2022-06-21 23:00:07at George Mason University that was published in Econ Journal Watch be reliable?[1] Truthsort (talk) 18:22, 10 May 2010 (UTC) That the author was an undergrad...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 48
Rabu, 2023-06-07 10:03:36Gilad Atzmon (who complain about defamation in an OTRS: Which is a more reliable source (not to mention NPOV) for the following quote: The original, in...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 192
Senin, 2025-09-01 03:35:53Greetings. Is The Telegraph article a reliable source regarding this statement [1] The Azov men use the neo-Nazi Wolfsangel (Wolf’s Hook) symbol on their...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 28
Selasa, 2023-02-21 13:18:33indication that it is published in their hardcopy magazine). Is this a reliable source? I believe that it blatantly is not, but User:American Eagle insists...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 141
Jumat, 2023-12-01 17:01:49well-written, meets NPOV, and other content policies, etc.), and I think a reliable source can be found, I'll either find a better source myself or remove...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 162
Kamis, 2023-03-16 05:51:59say that even while maintaining that the wikipedia sentence is fine and reliably sourceable using sources such as these)) Another indication that we should...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 258
Selasa, 2026-01-06 21:47:52Stories. Domain uses: hornet.com unicornbooty.com Is Hornet Stories a reliable or usable source? (Please refer to this diff and this Hornet Stories article...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 112
Senin, 2022-05-16 12:54:22(UTC) The Habibi review is reliable for the graphic novel Habibi and the author of Habibi, and would be reliable. It is reliable as it is published in an...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 96
Senin, 2024-11-18 14:14:33Is this a reliable source for the Boxer Rebellion article? John Smith's (talk) 21:56, 28 April 2011 (UTC) While he may not be as reliable as a specific...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 236
Minggu, 2022-06-26 00:26:53Darkness Shines (talk) 00:45, 6 January 2018 (UTC) I would argue that it is reliable as its about page (linked here) shows that there is editorial oversight...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 74
Jumat, 2025-01-10 20:51:45Is http://microformats.org/wiki/ a reliable source for information about microformats? It appears to be an open wiki (I made an account and made an edit)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 118
Jumat, 2023-03-24 20:05:44reception of this game. Is this a valid reason to remove the IGN review as a reliable source on the Mass Effect 3 WP page? Here is a link to the current Talk...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 147
Senin, 2023-08-21 02:17:37I'm starting to get frustrated with explaining reliable sources to someone in an AfD. Can someone please check out Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InternetReputation...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 271
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 03:37:06cited at all, since he is a Holocaust denier. The Mare's Nest could be a reliable source on German intelligence in the last two years of WWII. I haven't...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 185
Jumat, 2024-05-10 12:46:43publication once is therefore reliable at other publications that are less reliable. I would lean towards it being reliable for most things, but not such...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 92
Sabtu, 2023-02-25 01:06:36them. Bagumba (talk) 02:28, 16 March 2011 (UTC) I agree that this isn't a reliable source and shouldn't be used. TimidGuy (talk) 11:12, 16 March 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 315
Rabu, 2021-12-08 12:55:12blacklist following an RfC that did not specifically address it (Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_281#RfC:_Deprecation_of_fake_news_/_disinformation_sites...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 297
Kamis, 2021-02-04 04:14:04As per this, Bored Panda is used in 72 places. I believe them to be reliable only for proving the existence of somethings (like Elon Musk's Tesla Roadster...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 280
Sabtu, 2020-05-09 02:47:55November 2019 (UTC) Generally Reliable Newsweek is reliable. Simple. HAL333 20:00, 30 November 2019 (UTC) Generally Reliable Though there may have been incidental...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 391
Rabu, 2022-12-21 11:12:42are two reliable classifications. I would conclude that: "Glottolog is a reliable language bibliography. Its classification is generally reliable, except...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 295
Kamis, 2026-01-15 11:18:39that is non-reliable, so the talk page question is easily answered. However, I noticed that the discussion of CleanTechnica as reliable source was very...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 289
Minggu, 2023-07-09 22:14:21(UTC) Past Discussions Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 5#ArabNews Reliable, use caution Arab News is reliable source per WP:NEWSORG (even SharʿabSalam▼...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 248
Rabu, 2022-06-15 15:50:48source information with regard to mass shooting trends from a formerly reliable source which is four years out of date. Mass Shootings in America: Moving...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 105
Kamis, 2023-06-15 19:54:54propaganda. -- Takabeg (talk) 15:09, 12 September 2011 (UTC) The paper is not a reliable source, it is clearly selfpublished and have comparable authority to a...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Japan/Reliable sources
Sabtu, 2026-05-30 21:55:34WikiProjects have done and aims to be as comprehensive as possible similar to reliable sources lists by WikiProjects Korea, Africa, and Philippines. Discussion...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 269
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:43:41reliable source for anything. If a reliable source quotes a tweet, that is the only time it can be used and the citation should refer to the reliable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 100
Sabtu, 2025-12-27 01:14:23settling a work-related sexual-harassment lawsuit out of court, if you have a reliable newspaper source which reports "according to an anonymous source, it is...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 330
Senin, 2022-02-21 15:27:19here for further discussion. WCMemail 01:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC) Not Reliable Military-today.com is self-published by enthusiast Andrius Genys, who also...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 121
Selasa, 2025-09-23 20:29:38ref=1159 The Edit: [1] Please can someone tell me if the above source is reliable for the claim that Heather Nicholson is a vegan? Slimvirgin insists it...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 52
Kamis, 2025-02-27 00:14:59HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 17:00, 20 December 2009 (UTC) I think it's a reliable source and see no problem using it, with in-text attribution and clarifying...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 296
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:43:06material is reliable. In basically all cases it's reliable as evidence that "Plainsite said X". Per WP:RS it can't be treated as reliable for general...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 106
Minggu, 2024-11-17 18:15:15recognises this as a reliable source. There have been articles on BBC and Natgeo too, using Patrin as a source. So, is Patrin a reliable source for articles...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 278
Minggu, 2023-03-19 23:36:07(site for the "International Standard Name Identifier") considered to be a reliable source for biographical details like birthdate? It was added to a page...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 87
Jumat, 2023-12-01 17:02:23Could you kindly comment on if a Yale University PhD Thesis would be a reliable source for the article Kilgour-Matas report? Some material sourced to it...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 350
Senin, 2023-01-09 10:52:46I am not sure if Garden.org is reliable because they have an edit link above the info. SVcode(Talk) 01:24, 13 August 2021 (UTC) It looks like a multi-user...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 69
Senin, 2025-08-11 08:08:27political partisanship of the subject. Are group blogs like Daily Kos and MyDD reliable sources in this instance? WP:RS and WP:V seem to say very clearly that...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 200
Jumat, 2023-04-28 00:01:27However, one of the user has started removing them by declaring them non-reliable, the article is in serious consideration and by this moment we need a confirmation...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 89
Senin, 2025-04-14 15:59:35Israpundit, but always look to reference opinions elsewhere to more mainstream reliable sources. As WP:SPS says, "if the information in question is really worth...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 7
Minggu, 2023-12-17 01:02:16Are forum posts a reliable source for Wikipedia, such as on www.freerepublic.com/forum/a39a525043cb8.htm ? Various users are adding forum posts as RS here:...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 228
Sabtu, 2023-01-28 23:41:28news sources" and not reliable enough to make this statement as written above. I understand that these sources are not as reliable as a journal article...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 182
Sabtu, 2026-02-21 10:42:55of Eric Garner article about whether the medical examiner's report is a reliable source for Eric Garner's cause of death. In short, an NYPD officer applied...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 126
Jumat, 2023-06-16 22:24:36L'Osservatore Romano, reliable for statements by the Vatican featured in L'Osservatore Romano English edition, 1995, October, page 12 a reliable source for stating...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 159
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:46:39reliable sources. They are both pushing an agenda. A similar argument has been made elsewhere regarding Breitbart. If TPM and Policymic are reliable,...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 242
Minggu, 2025-02-23 22:12:11discussion. Would publications on the following outlets be considered reliable sources?: The Hill (newspaper) The Daily Caller Fox News I've come across...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 86
Minggu, 2024-10-20 08:49:55NOT reliable. How can it be?? Hauskalainen (talk) 03:00, 13 January 2011 (UTC) I think you may be confusing "reliable" with "wrong". It's a reliable source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 127
Senin, 2025-01-20 06:16:00copied with permission" from Virtual Vermonter. I'm not sure this is a reliable source for the entire article, or that "copied with permission" is a valid...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 36
Selasa, 2024-11-26 05:18:12Is it apropriate to use American College of Pediatricians (ACP) as a reliable source on same-sex parenting issues? According to http://www.boston...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 64
Selasa, 2023-03-14 19:31:22newspaper that doesn't make him a reliable source. It should be noted that Epeefleche regards a book by Sean hannity as a reliable source for senate testimony...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 83
Jumat, 2023-03-03 02:31:50you'll have to be more specific. Naimark appears to be a reliable source, and sometimes reliable sources have bias. Historians are known to disagree, so...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 376
Minggu, 2023-07-09 22:12:59I would like to know whether these sources are reliable,if not please add those to list of non-reliable sources list TuluveRai123 (talk) 16:55, 8 May 2022...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 103
Rabu, 2022-05-04 11:40:38and appears to more reliable than the other sources listed here. - JuneGloom Talk 00:00, 16 August 2011 (UTC) Are the URLs of reliable sources ever blacklisted...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 359
Sabtu, 2026-03-07 23:11:45the typical reliable sourcing standards. If they're not reliable, then we should probably modify WP:RSP to indicate that AJ+ is not reliable and should...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 240
Minggu, 2026-03-08 00:11:022018 (UTC) This is not a work of history. It is a religious tract. It is reliable only for the beliefs of the author. Richard Keatinge (talk) 06:58, 29 March...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 193
Senin, 2023-01-30 15:50:09per Wikipedia:CITOGENESIS. Gamaliel (talk) 21:21, 7 July 2015 (UTC) Not reliable. Capitalismojo (talk) 22:09, 7 July 2015 (UTC) Terrible source, copied...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 190
Minggu, 2023-03-19 06:36:09lately where he asserted that newspaper reviews should not be considered a reliable source. The AfDs in question are Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Undercover:...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 210
Minggu, 2023-07-09 22:10:49com/pokemon-go-stats.html is a reliable source for sharing latest stats on Pokemon Go. I also wanted to check if Pickdup.com/stats is a reliable source according to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 12
Senin, 2026-03-02 22:22:45Wikipedia. Would liner notes from CDs in the BBC Legends series be considered reliable sources ? They are often written by people who knew the subjects of the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 285
Rabu, 2023-03-22 04:08:32of its content is crowdsourced and thus not reliable enough. Is "no source at all" somehow more reliable? They are on a slippery slope, and inline citations...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 152
Selasa, 2025-01-21 01:54:56is Beeche? We certainly shouldn't use anything that isn't a spotlessly reliable source to call someone a haemophiliac. I've deleted the section. We still...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 43
Senin, 2025-05-19 22:54:57a reliable source that establishes notability? See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip A. Burrows and here for context. If the source is reliable and...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 75
Rabu, 2025-11-19 01:48:11finding reliable sources, but should not generally use it as a reliable source itself. It is an open-wiki, and is clearly not considered a reliable source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 246
Minggu, 2022-03-27 01:57:26July 2018 (UTC) I didn't say he wasn't reliable. I said he was reliable as a primary source. Like I am a reliable primary source about how flipping hot...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 261
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 17:04:33looks so official, solid, reliable. "Yes, patents are reliable sources about specific items they patent. They are not reliable sources about more general...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 379
Rabu, 2022-11-02 23:46:33isn't a reliable source? Or that anything that has been published in a deprecated source can never become reliable, even if reprinted by a reliable source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 180
Jumat, 2023-12-01 17:01:09this GamerGate stuff -- is it appropriate to consider pieces of media reliable sources for controversies that they themselves are the subject of? Extending...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 54
Kamis, 2026-04-16 19:13:39be used in articles. If they've been noted in reliable secondary sources (e.g. reliable books, reliable newspapers), then they can be cited, using the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 306
Minggu, 2025-02-23 03:35:16Support --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:12, 8 August 2020 (UTC) Yes. WP:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_294#Headlines already seemed to come to that...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 208
Senin, 2022-05-30 21:08:202016 (UTC) Reliable In the absence of obvious red flags, a source is reliable if it is widely referenced by other sources we know are reliable. This appears...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 181
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:45:55invite everyone to include those for which they find reliable sources. But to remove a reliable source on the mere speculation that it may have been based...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 279
Sabtu, 2020-05-09 03:44:56GENERALLY RELIABLE FOR ALL PURPOSES There is a strong consensus that ProPublica is generally reliable for all purposes because of it has an excellent...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 312
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 17:07:50reached follows. There is consensus that Xinhua News Agency is generally reliable for factual reporting except in areas where the Government of China may...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 272
Selasa, 2025-11-18 01:10:31a reliable source to be used at the suicide article? It appears to be very reliable. If it is reliable should we not say what that reliable source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 158
Senin, 2023-01-30 15:50:42seems decent. Shii (tock) 19:31, 7 October 2013 (UTC) Splashpage would be reliable if it were sure of itself, but in the linked-to article it specifically...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 274
Rabu, 2020-12-30 23:39:14Hi. Is Xinhua News Agency a reliable source for a claim that 50 countries signed the letter supporting China's policies on Xinjiang?[1] In the Xinjiang...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 145
Sabtu, 2023-02-18 20:55:00published in a reliable source independent of GCC, I think that the retraction of that opinion should also be published in a reliable source independent...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 275
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 14:46:50consider whether the NYT article should have its Epstein coverage demoted to "reliable but not independent" based on some or all of the following points is sufficient...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 62
Kamis, 2022-05-26 02:50:04content? I have seen it both accepted and rejected, is there a list of not reliable online links? Off2riorob (talk) 20:59, 10 April 2010 (UTC) Hmmm...the last...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 197
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:45:33them. So, instead of asking whether Vocativ is reliable overall, we should explore whether it's reliable for some specific item. One indication of reliability...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 273
Selasa, 2023-02-21 13:18:38Reliable for what exactly? For the individual opinion of an expert in the field? Reliable as a statement of fact or consensus in the field? Reliable for...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 138
Minggu, 2026-04-19 21:45:00rejected as a reliable source. However, if it hadn't been - that's why we're discussing it here, to determine whether or not it's reliable. As for the other...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 218
Sabtu, 2026-03-07 23:11:41outside authors (op-eds) are reliable primary sources for statements attributed to that editor or author, but are rarely reliable for statements of fact."...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 67
Selasa, 2025-09-23 22:49:37"gift" in any sense). I suggested that BLPs have a stringent definition of "reliable source" but am otherwise at a stalemate regarding a persistent editor....
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 123
Senin, 2022-05-16 12:54:15be reliable sources of that. They need to be from a reliable source and be produced to show the fact or have the fact pointed out by the reliable source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 229
Minggu, 2023-07-09 22:12:56other RS, so it seems to me that it's not a notable opinion. Is she a reliable source for the statement that redskins referred to bloody corpses/bodies...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 129
Rabu, 2023-10-04 05:06:23the most reliable of sources in regard to accurate birthdates. If these violate WP:BLPPRIMARY then no references should be allowed as reliable sources...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 108
Jumat, 2025-09-26 05:11:05a "reliable source", by Wikipedia's definition, is not a reliable source of truth or certainty, and never a source of the whole truth. "Reliable" newspapers...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 267
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:43:51not for profit organisation. Can either of these websites be regarded as reliable? My gut says no but I would appreciate some opinions, especially in relation...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 323
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 03:37:37staff, etc., to determine if it's reliable or not; our only modus is to see if reliable sources consider it reliable. A cursory search on Google News of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 253
Minggu, 2025-11-02 21:08:19There is a clear consensus that WorldNetDaily is not a reliable source, that it should not be used because of its particularly poor reputation for fact-checking...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 166
Kamis, 2023-07-27 21:41:01other sites seem to consider them reliable. It's not overwhelming evidence or anything, but maybe they're reliable enough for simple claims. NinjaRobotPirate...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 214
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:44:57I was considering declining the edit request, but as I'm uncertain how reliable Upworthy is, I figured I may as well bounce this to RSN to see what others...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 256
Sabtu, 2021-04-24 18:39:14Unreliable. The source, ArticleBio, has been previously discussed at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 226 § articlebio.com for BLP information. There...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 157
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:46:44by the International Guitar Research Archives (IGRA) staff and appears reliable. --ChakaKongLet's talk about it 21:31, 30 September 2013 (UTC) Note that...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 329
Senin, 2021-11-15 01:59:11Is Taiwan News a reliable source, a marginally reliable source, an unreliable source, or should it be deprecated? Does reliability still stand especially...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 334
Rabu, 2025-09-24 03:59:16already stated when you asked this question the first time, we expect reliable sources to retract and correct articles; that's what responsible authors...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 307
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 03:37:28evidence to the contrary. Not reliable "like Fox", actually reliable. Guy (help! - typo?) 00:14, 16 August 2020 (UTC) Reliable for reporting, including politics...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 314
Minggu, 2022-05-01 12:28:23types, please indicate which of the following applies: Option 1: Generally reliable for factual reporting Option 2: Unclear or additional considerations apply...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 125
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:47:05considered a reliable (primary) source for The Zeitgeist Movement? For example, as a reliable (primary) source (used in support of reliable secondary sources)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 259
Senin, 2022-05-16 12:51:23content.Slatersteven (talk) 16:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC) AGree. It's not a reliable source. No fact-checking or editorial review board. Walter Görlitz (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 95
Sabtu, 2021-10-16 23:13:46net, http://www.roman-emperors.org, and http://www.roman-colosseum.info reliable sources on articles about Roman emperors? Simple as that! :) --WhiteWriter...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 305
Minggu, 2026-02-08 19:06:32translations, editors are polarised between those who consider it to be a reliable source and those who consider it unreliable. Some editors consider MEMRI...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 57
Sabtu, 2023-01-28 23:40:52it is, but hey, let the reader judge. Reliable source? Please point me to the rule that distinguishes "reliable" from "unreliable")". Dougweller (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 227
Sabtu, 2023-04-15 21:29:09otherwise rumored by other unreliable sources on the internet. Is this a reliable source? --Aleccat 02:08, 8 June 2017 (UTC) From the site: "NB:All press...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 51
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:41:53sourcing: WP:MEDRS/N. Currently such matters end up at Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources (medicine-related articles) and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 93
Sabtu, 2026-03-07 05:02:52anything, read Wikipedia:Reliable sources very carefully, and look at related pages such as Wikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable_sources.--Toddy1 (talk) 10:31...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 381
Minggu, 2023-08-27 03:48:12are already not reliable, participants also brought forward sources that served to show whether BI could be considered generally reliable or not. Those...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 114
Senin, 2023-01-30 15:51:47credentials, are their articles in longwarjournal.com and jihadica.com reliable sources? Writegeist (talk) 10:13, 19 January 2012 (UTC) Joscelyn has been...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 195
Senin, 2023-01-30 15:50:00on the web that previously were published as small books. From WP:UGC (Reliable Sources - User Generated Content): "Self-published material may sometimes...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 268
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 14:43:17Stürmer magazine, which is impact of hate, then I suppose that source is reliable, unreliable, depreciated or spam, as I gave the consensus on English Wikipedia...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 265
Senin, 2024-07-29 03:34:20Can anyone please tell me, whether this thesis can be considered as a reliable source to expand Saadat Ali Khan I article. This is written by Ashirbadi...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 76
Jumat, 2023-03-03 02:31:39particle emission per unit energy" (p. 346; PDF p. 2.) Is that review a reliable secondary source in the context of the cold fusion article for the following...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 107
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:47:35presentation have been noted on the talk page of the Kunbi article. Is the source reliable for articles on the Indian caste system like the Kunbi? Relevant discussions...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 191
Kamis, 2026-04-16 20:42:16school's websites without any prior discussion of whether or not LST is a reliable source of information. Law School Transparency or related parties have...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 167
Jumat, 2023-03-03 02:30:56and the Scaife Foundations. I believe Desmogblog should not qualify as a reliable source for the purposes of CFACT because, 1) it's a group blog (cf. WP:BLOGS)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 176
Minggu, 2023-07-09 22:09:42referred to as a terrorist organization in U.N. communiqués. One of many reliable and verifiable sources, directly from the UN website: 7 August 2014 – As...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 131
Senin, 2026-03-09 20:31:33Dr. David C.F. Wright and the bios on his site www.wrightmusic.net are reliable ? I've not heard of him. A number of his biographies are being used as...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 313
Selasa, 2020-10-20 18:19:00United States and one of the questions people have about the page is about reliable source coverage of the subject as a group. Among the websites offered for...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 135
Jumat, 2025-11-21 01:32:34a reliable source and whether the sources inserted are considered reliable. We have already substantiated that ExtremeTech and iFixit are reliable sources...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 375
Minggu, 2026-06-07 00:47:37challenged my removal of the Journal of Indo-European Studies and insists it is reliable and mainstream although stating that "Their continuing involvement with...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 136
Rabu, 2026-03-11 21:14:15and a reliable source for I-P related topics that it be used for making third-party claims? Ankh.Morpork 19:11, 27 October 2012 (UTC) A reliable source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 98
Rabu, 2025-03-05 21:32:41Wikipedia. Are they reliable? Albacore (talk) 23:38, 9 June 2011 (UTC) For what? Sources that are reliable for one statement may not be reliable for another....
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 331
Senin, 2024-11-25 23:53:56reliable for details about the work. The album credits, including release dates and personell are usually reliable. The "genre cloud" is not reliable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 326
Selasa, 2025-09-23 17:53:46Only Music Critic Who Matters" by the New York Times (AKA the most reliable of reliable sources), Wikipedia's refusal to acknowledge him as an album reviewer...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 325
Minggu, 2022-05-01 12:28:11Nonie Darwish was not a reliable source in Islam (Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_306#Is_Nonie_Darwish_a_reliable_source?). However, Stefka...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 73
Sabtu, 2023-01-28 23:40:31TODAY" Group. Some users User:Tarc and User:Kkm010 are suppressing it as reliable source, please help... .................... ORIGINAL CONTEXT Recently Mail...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 174
Kamis, 2025-09-11 00:10:35(Talk) 17:17, 10 July 2014 (UTC) Are the sources given with this text reliable? First was President George W. Bush's choice, Michael J. Sullivan, whose...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 134
Sabtu, 2024-06-15 13:53:53the source reliable, it is the most reliable source possible (for a statement about what is said in a document, you can not get more reliable than the document...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 245
Jumat, 2024-01-26 18:24:37Hi all. I was hoping for some opinions on the use of census data as a reliable secondary source. There may be guidelines that cover this point, but I cannot...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 238
Jumat, 2020-04-17 01:27:15he was a resident. Would this source be permissible per WP:SELFPUB as a reliable source solely for this purpose? Alansohn (talk) 16:42, 8 February 2018...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 266
Sabtu, 2023-01-28 23:41:12Neurologica is Steven Novella's blog. It's on a high level, and is obviously reliable for statements specifically ascribed to Novella. This is about Amy Sequenzia...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 216
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:44:52the reliable independant sources are stating they are missing, you would reflect that. However a government source is a primary source and reliable for...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 290
Senin, 2023-01-30 15:48:26February 2020 (UTC) No Where more reliable sources agree with their data, use the more reliable sources. Where more reliable sources disagree with it, then...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 113
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:47:20Is this a reliable source for information in a BLP? I can find no editorial oversight on the site. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:44, 7 January 2012 (UTC) Probably...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 155
Minggu, 2026-03-15 17:21:14claiming that recognition has been withdrawn are Moroccan, they aren't reliable and hence Vietnam should be listed as still recognizing. What are others...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 209
Senin, 2026-05-04 03:32:16(UTC) That's a tough one:fansites are usually not reliable sources, but if it's cited by other reliable sources as a useful resource, that might give it...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 156
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:46:49clearly be reliable for the politics, etc of the modern Arab world. But sources aren't reliable necessarily for everything. How can they be a reliable source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 225
Kamis, 2025-09-11 00:10:15publish is obvious "fake news". So I'm pretty sure this source is NOT reliable, generally speaking. However, in the interest of compromise, I'm willing...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 120
Jumat, 2023-03-03 06:31:54really prefer a secondary source, though. My musings aside, is the source reliable for the assertions?--Bbb23 (talk) 17:41, 14 April 2012 (UTC) True its not...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 117
Sabtu, 2026-02-28 23:56:09A journal may be reliable source in general, without any article in it necessarily also being reliable; but for a generally reliable journal, impugning...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 324
Sabtu, 2026-03-28 22:54:56[10] 6) Most of the articles written by Poreklo members are based on reliable sources and use multiple citations, as any decent study/work should. [11]...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 196
Kamis, 2024-10-17 07:31:28even in that one place. Is the source reliable on its own and/or is it reliable in conjunction with a reliable source that he grew up in that community...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 231
Senin, 2025-10-13 21:33:042017 (UTC) If the DM is not a reliable source, while it is a reliable source for its own opinions, it is not a reliable source for the opinions of other...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 224
Senin, 2023-01-30 15:49:062016. At the talk page, the claim has been made that the DEA ref is not reliable for this statement. Thoughts? Jytdog (talk) 10:13, 3 April 2017 (UTC) As...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 116
Kamis, 2026-04-16 19:42:41twenty times. I would like to know if these two sources could be considred reliable for a BLP. Due to the large number of references, is it actually expident...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 222
Jumat, 2022-05-20 22:13:19From List of Chinese teas article: Is the following section reliably sourced? There is a main section and two subsections, which I have converted to bold...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 235
Minggu, 2024-10-20 05:50:04unquestionably not a neutral commentator. Per [3], this editor thinks that OCA are reliable because Codex Alimentarius is funded by the "biotech lobby" and does not...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 79
Selasa, 2023-03-14 19:31:27construction of film, he isn't reliable. The other two features of a reliable source are lacking: reliable publisher, and reliable mode of publication with...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 94
Jumat, 2025-12-05 09:42:54are much preferred in general. Also, snippets mentioned in passing in reliable sources on unrelated topics are not the best sources to use. --Nuujinn...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 81
Selasa, 2025-11-18 02:57:01refers to his site here: [2]. The Guardian seems to be using his site as a reliable source here: "Home in on votes", S A Mathieson, The Guardian Thursday 3...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 165
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:46:29In 2011, there was a discussion whether Astro-Databank (ADB) was a reliable source, see here. I want to clarify (as an editor of ADB), that the project...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 241
Rabu, 2025-09-24 21:34:35major publishing house if they have no expertise on the matter Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_11#Bostom_and_Prometheus_books--Shrike (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 71
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 03:38:34[this old WP:RSN] discussion.) And this by same person who thought it was reliable to mention that David Duke published him, despite no evidence he asked...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 199
Selasa, 2025-09-23 20:49:03stories, but I can't tell what area this table covers, nor whether this is a reliable source for these statements. Any advice, particularly from editors with...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 78
Jumat, 2023-03-24 10:07:46question here is whether or not the CAMERA website or Alex Safian are reliable, expert, fact-checked, or peer-reviewed sources of information about UN...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 322
Sabtu, 2025-09-27 22:33:30reliable source? Chetsford (talk) 06:55, 17 December 2020 (UTC) Reliable for news about South Carolina As the question-asker, I think it's reliable since...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 111
Jumat, 2023-06-16 22:20:27Is http://www.hypnoweb.net/ a reliable source? In particular, the BLP Joseph Kennedy (actor) uses http://robin-des-bois.hypnoweb.net/acteurs-secondair...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 362
Sabtu, 2022-03-26 16:31:47com? Option 1: Generally reliable Option 2: Less than generally reliable Option 3: Generally unreliable Option 4: Reliable for their own opinion only...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
Sabtu, 2023-01-28 23:41:37sources. The Kurdish Information Centre is an advocacy group and in no way reliable for etymology. Driver was a distinguished scholar but his work is completely...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 299
Minggu, 2026-03-15 22:11:36alone makes it not a reliable source: it's about as reliable as any YouTube video. Loki (talk) 03:48, 12 June 2020 (UTC) Not reliable except for quotes,...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 66
Kamis, 2023-02-16 16:57:09Is a NYT cite (print edition, given on the article talk page) a valid reliable source for stating that Ceausescu was found guilty of genocide, that he...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 133
Jumat, 2022-05-20 15:16:25because a tendentious user won't accept an archetypically reliable source. Is the BBC reliable for the statements removed here? The user in question claims...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 206
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:45:09"They're reliable sources, so they're reliable sources about phil. sci." ignores the role of context in determining whether a source is reliable. I am saying...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 139
Minggu, 2026-04-19 21:30:02has previously been published by reliable third-party publications." Evidence presented me is that possibly reliable sources simply issued opinions as...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 310
Rabu, 2024-07-24 14:55:43considered reliable when produced by an established subject-matter expert, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Independent sources
Rabu, 2026-04-15 20:31:10tagged with {{third-party}}, and if no substantive coverage in independent reliable secondary sources can be identified, then the article should be nominated...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 317
Sabtu, 2021-06-26 18:12:43used in several articles and I wonder the website can be considered as reliable or unreliable. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 06:25, 3 November 2020 (UTC) I...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 194
Senin, 2022-05-23 03:26:25reliable sources. Doug Weller (talk) 14:06, 28 July 2015 (UTC) The source reliably supports the specific statement made in the article (it reliably verifies...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 321
Sabtu, 2024-02-03 09:03:47page. I was wondering whether or not this source was considered generally reliable. I did not find many discussions about it in the archives, none of which...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 355
Selasa, 2022-11-01 05:44:23reliability of Al Bawaba from 2015 which is not useful here.Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_198 The statements that have been tagged are:...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 42
Selasa, 2025-09-23 23:31:17bigbrothernetwork a reliable source?". It does not seem to be a reliable source to me, and I agree with AniMate above. If you can't find valid reliable sources,...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 72
Sabtu, 2025-01-11 05:40:26think it may be spam, and, apart from the photos, it's obviously not a reliable source: should it be deleted? p.s. Ditto re "Creake Abbey at Neolithicsea...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/Cosmopolitan
Sabtu, 2025-10-04 15:14:07WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 3#IMDb Publicity WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 109#Tell me if I'm in the right place WP:Reliable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Singapore/Reliable sources
Jumat, 2026-05-22 08:19:47verdicts on whether they are reliable. Sources deemed unreliable on here should generally not be used. See also Wikipedia:Reliable sources for site-wide guidelines...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 252
Minggu, 2022-03-27 01:57:08mainstream media. For Icewhiz: The book is usable, Gross is considered to be a reliable source on the topic, and the criticism for the book has predominantly come...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 226
Sabtu, 2023-04-15 21:29:57a reliable source on fake news even though his editorial opinions were also widely reported by reliable sources. I say that neither is a reliable source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 352
Selasa, 2021-09-21 11:07:45Is FII a reliable source for any content on Wikipedia? What about passage of WP:N? Added later: For example, does this interview contribute to notability...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 201
Rabu, 2022-05-04 11:40:26details/biodata, etc; but IMDb is QUITE reliable regarding credits, roles, etc". I have not heard this blanket "Imdb is reliable for credits, roles, etc." argument...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 239
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 17:03:29the film's credits (link below). Apparently this doesn't constitute a "reliable source." Can that really be possible? I can even tell you at what moment...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 146
Senin, 2023-01-30 15:50:59editorial oversight or even remotely meet anything that would make it a reliable source. User:Skookum1 seems to think that their credentials (supposedly...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 212
Minggu, 2023-03-26 01:50:39archive of material from numerous sources. One cannot say that it is blanket reliable or blanket unreliable, it will depend on the material, its author, and...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 328
Minggu, 2022-05-01 12:28:00NewsMax as substantially less reliable that RT/Sputnik, which are Russian state propaganda networks. OANN is less reliable that TruthOut. That's... not...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 318
Selasa, 2022-06-28 17:09:02http://sherdog.com Is it reliable? I found it completely unreliable and unverifiable. It has no about page. The website in question's person (mixed martial...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 319
Minggu, 2026-03-15 22:09:08Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. When I joined Wikipedia, I used to refer this list for every source I use, just to make sure that it is reliable....
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 109
Rabu, 2025-09-24 02:26:27d_alternative_communication#Rate_enhancement_strategies we're having a reliable sources question (and we probably want high value sources because we're...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 204
Kamis, 2024-10-17 07:12:09Virginia: National Technical Information Service, ongoing Is proffered as a reliable source for the particular claim that "Henry Gibson" was the legal name...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 311
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:42:41encyclopedias can be reliable sources if the content is sourced from reliable secondary sources but if the content is sourced from a mix of reliable and unreliable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 154
Jumat, 2023-04-21 18:41:04like some opinions on whether this organization should be considered a reliable source, and on whether the online survey behind the numbers is legitimate...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 357
Jumat, 2023-12-01 17:02:50are considered reliable). Even anime has Anime News Network and Crunchyroll News as reliable English-language sources, while reliable esports-focused...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 345
Sabtu, 2025-09-27 05:24:48Baathist Iraq nor MEK (widely regarded as a cult) should not be considered as reliable as scholarly sources. While I'm ok with stating Iraqi denials, that should...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Instructions
Kamis, 2025-12-04 21:05:46and explains how to maintain the list as new discussions appear on the reliable sources noticeboard. Any editor is welcome to update the list using this...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 124
Senin, 2026-03-02 22:24:0002:09, 6 June 2012 (UTC) reliable source here some tag for trying not deleted Frederic Gracia page I place here some reliable references found and added...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 303
Senin, 2026-03-16 09:38:15Link Would this link be considered reliable? Would it count towards notability? Thanks! The overall source is OK; the article itself is a bit borderline...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 148
Minggu, 2024-11-17 03:05:25a site that is selling a product (but not the manufacturer thereof) a reliable source for the ingredients in that product? LadyofShalott 23:16, 25 April...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 234
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 17:02:15in reliable sources. If reliable sources consistently describe someone or something as far-left or far-right, we use these terms; where the reliable sources...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 142
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:47:00genealogical agency puts such data online, the data is not necessarily reliable: it all depends how well the work was done. The real problem for us, as...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 389
Kamis, 2026-04-16 17:41:14Source 2: Reliable. Source 3: Reliable. Source 4: Reliable. Source 5: Reliable. Source 6: Reliable. Source 7: Reliable. Source 8: So old it is impractical...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 211
Sabtu, 2023-01-28 23:41:47has, in fact, never been charged with a crime. There is, of course, no reliable source claiming that Clinton ever has been charged with a crime, but there...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 340
Selasa, 2025-09-23 17:54:46Farmer shows just enough presence in reliable sources that other reliable sources consider him to be a reliable music journalist in dance and electronic...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 77
Jumat, 2025-01-10 20:51:46not. The site lists one child for George: he had four. This isn't what a reliable source looks like. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 17:05, 18 September 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 178
Rabu, 2022-03-16 12:33:14appreciated. In other words: Are IMDb, Findagrave and "I couldn't find it" reliable sources? - SummerPhD (talk) 01:50, 30 September 2014 (UTC) I think the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 351
Kamis, 2022-02-17 15:17:52This study here: https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/21/10/939/htm Is it reliable? Apparently MDPI was cleared of any poor peer-reviewing charges and Entropy...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 364
Senin, 2022-01-31 11:11:51said yes. Please point me to the section and line where it says that a reliable source need to follow WP:NPOV. I understand that promotional coverages...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 237
Sabtu, 2026-05-09 04:44:03in a scholarly book (meeting wiki requirements of wp:secondary and wp:reliable) such as by Donald W. Beachler (2011) The genocide debate: politicians...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 249
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:44:07Italian, so I'm hoping someone can verify if this should be considered a reliable source. --Kansas Bear (talk) 03:17, 21 September 2018 (UTC) This is it:Atlante...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 151
Minggu, 2026-03-08 08:34:13"multiple mainstream sources" have to, of course, be reliable, and popular press articles are not reliable for this topic, so WP:REDFLAG most definitely applies...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 99
Senin, 2023-01-30 15:46:47reliable source? See the articles in this Google News Archive search such as this article. Is Siliconera a blog website, and if so, is it a reliable one...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 223
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:44:41and if the article can't be improved so that it is better founded in reliable stats it might have to be deleted. Itsmejudith (talk) 07:37, 9 March 2017...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 132
Sabtu, 2022-06-04 18:55:222012}}</ref><ref name=motherjones/><ref name=Forbes/> Are the first two sources "reliable sources" in the context of a BLP? My belief is that opinion articles named...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 347
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 17:11:41appropriate interpretation. I see this has also been discussed under Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Vice_on_Bret_Weinstein where 力 brought up the same...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 291
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 17:05:54ticeboard#RfC_on_race_and_intelligence whether the following source is reliable as an assessment of the fringe nature of the opinion that there are "genetic...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 384
Selasa, 2022-10-04 07:31:57way that suggested a "considerations apply" close while saying generally reliable. I think the several month gap between the expiration of the RfC in Aug...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 277
Jumat, 2026-02-13 03:04:21reliability? Generally reliable Generally reliable, with the exception of sales data (recommend better source) Generally reliable, with the exception of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 257
Sabtu, 2026-05-02 05:12:33wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_220#Daily_Mail_RfC and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 286
Rabu, 2024-07-24 14:55:29Hi everyone, do you know if this website qualifies as a reliable source? It seems to present out-of-this-world ideas, however it tells the reader they...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 183
Kamis, 2022-05-05 23:51:54according to the stub dedicated to it on the Hebrew Wikipedia (חדשות 0404),reliable for facts? I have raised the issue at the talk page of List of violent...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 164
Sabtu, 2023-01-28 23:42:42at most) is being used as secondary, so he must be recognized by other reliable source, before it is being recognized here? Bladesmulti (talk) 15:56, 26...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Specialized-style fallacy
Minggu, 2026-04-12 05:54:12the most reliable source of detailed facts about the specialty, such as we might cite in a topical article, it must also be the most reliable source for...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 219
Senin, 2023-01-30 15:49:11Wikisource is a reliable source. Also, "reliable source" is not a yes/no option, and what are reliable sources for some things are not reliable for others...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 309
Selasa, 2025-09-23 18:44:04"unreliable source." My mission is thusly twofold: (a) to be reclassified as a reliable source. (b) to be removed from the whitelist. Here are examples of our...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 378
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 03:38:01(talk) 21:09, 11 June 2022 (UTC) No. No politician should be considered a reliable source on any topic other than areas in which they may have professional...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 177
Sabtu, 2025-09-27 22:33:20that wording is especially problematic. In reality (and in another more reliable source) Caransa said his marriage to his Catholic wife and his blonde hair...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 316
Selasa, 2021-08-10 21:30:34bringing an article to its current state, regardless of whether the source is reliable. However, I can support notifying related WikiProjects about RfCs on this...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Myanmar/Reliable sources
Kamis, 2025-12-04 20:40:13can and cannot be used as a source. If you want to request a source as reliable, submit your question for consensus. The same method if you want to question...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 184
Kamis, 2025-08-28 22:10:31importance of ascertaining whether or not the below-referenced are, in fact, reliable sources. Matthew Boyle (19 September 2012). "Emails reveal Justice Dept...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 161
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:46:34talk page that the source's "conservative counterweight" sentence is not reliable. ALEC coordinates "task force" meetings among state legislators and private-sector...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 344
Minggu, 2024-04-07 22:48:36articles to give more credence to the lab leak theory. So, is the source reliable for that purpose? --Guy Macon (talk) 04:04, 24 May 2021 (UTC) No. Credence...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 230
Sabtu, 2025-02-08 14:49:15about citing Twitter. My understanding is that Tweets can be cited as a reliable source as long as WP:BLPSELFPUB is met. What about tweets which are subsequently...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 168
Jumat, 2024-10-04 07:22:08Is this About.com page on comfort food reliable for the list of American and Canadian comfort foods in this section of the comfort food Wikipedia article...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 263
Sabtu, 2026-03-07 23:06:46Is Timeline a reliable source? I am considering adding the following information to the Xennials article: [Xennials] represent a small population among...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 232
Selasa, 2026-03-03 00:21:16Anarcho-authoritarian (talk) 18:14, 30 September 2017 (UTC) AIM looks as reliable in its political allegations as Jones himself, i.e. not at all Anarcho-authoritarian...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 205
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 03:36:41content must be verifiable in a reliable source, including non-independent, self-published, and primary sources that are reliable for the specific claim being...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 49
Kamis, 2024-12-12 00:20:38here not whether this E.o.E. is a reliable source... it is a reliable source by neutral standards, and a reliable source can not be voted out of usage...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 339
Senin, 2022-05-16 12:51:02this "massacre" as required by WP:EVENT. However whether or not these are reliable sources independent of the subject is disputed (see AFD discussion here)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 187
Kamis, 2026-04-16 19:34:10Wikidata for a complete list). It is my contention that wikidata is not a reliable source. My contention rests on two planks, either of which is enough to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 198
Sabtu, 2023-07-29 00:46:52WP:Permalink for it is here. It's about using comicbookmovie.com as a WP:Reliable source or rather for exclusive interviews. While I've stated that I understand...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Flagged revisions/reliable revisions
Jumat, 2010-06-04 16:32:07The reliable revisions proposal is a proposed procedure for the usage of the flagged revisions MediaWiki extension (see mw:Extension:FlaggedRevs for the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 283
Kamis, 2020-01-23 10:49:15Hi, My article on Tadeusz Sielanka has been rejected due to lack of reliable sources. At least on of the listed sources is scientific "objective" publication:...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 301
Selasa, 2025-01-21 05:38:14substituted with reliable secondary sources. Citations of closed campaigns might be usable as primary sources when used to supplement reliable secondary sources...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 202
Selasa, 2023-05-09 16:43:06but I had the discipline to delete it before posting my reliable sources question on this reliable sources board. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 01:45, 16 January...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/reliable
Minggu, 2025-09-21 16:01:33#−A B−D E−G H−L M−N O−R S−T U−Z Overflow These are all the reliable sources extracted from subpages 1 – 8. (There might be a few stragglers missing, especially...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 348
Kamis, 2023-02-23 11:27:22find a reliable source for Extended CLR. If the FCC is considered a reliable source, my feeling is the name should be changed unless a reliable source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 254
Minggu, 2022-05-01 12:30:02relevant. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 05:46, 17 November 2018 (UTC) Agree - reliable for attributed statements of opinion (in limited situations), but not for...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 217
Minggu, 2023-07-09 22:12:03However, if you have seen a bootleg copy of a reliable source, the original reliable source is still reliable; you just aren't allowed to link to where you...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 371
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 14:52:10RfC. The claim in question concerns living persons, so Decider is not reliable for the purpose of inserting this claim into a Wikipedia article. Decider...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 337
Senin, 2026-02-09 08:33:21outside authors (op-eds) are reliable primary sources for statements attributed to that editor or author, but are rarely reliable for statements of fact. In...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 44
Senin, 2025-08-11 08:06:38categorized as commentary sometimes. See [1] [2][3]. Is the pokemon article reliable for an article on Bulbasaur? - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 17:15...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/Daily Kos
Sabtu, 2025-10-04 03:24:58activism. WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 182#Breitbart again WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 185#Daily Kos Elections WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 298
Minggu, 2024-01-07 08:45:43field or (b) the commentary is notable, as established by mentions in reliable independent sources. Opinions are, famously, like arseholes: everybody...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 302
Rabu, 2024-07-24 14:55:34are reliable for some things but not reliable for other things? GDX420 (talk) 16:10, 9 July 2020 (UTC) France24, BBC, and CNBC are solidly reliable sources...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 332
Sabtu, 2021-03-20 18:03:38Rating: [2] 02:57, 6 January 2021 (UTC) Media Bias Fact Check is not a reliable source and should not be invoked in talk page discussions, it says pretty...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 143
Minggu, 2024-11-17 20:48:02palmar crease. Location (talk) 06:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC) If it is not a reliable source, what do we have to do about such claims? Is saying "the handprint...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 243
Minggu, 2022-03-27 01:57:31quite established.Icewhiz (talk) 11:48, 12 June 2018 (UTC) Yes, these are reliable (despite the fact that Browning does write some grade-A nonsense) but the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 387
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 03:38:15Summary Is iNaturalist reliable for sourcing photos of species for articles? And what should we do about it? Previous discussion - consensus was INaturalist...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 173
Selasa, 2025-09-23 20:43:48No consensus that RT is or is not reliable for general purposes. If someone has a specific claim RT is trying to make about a specific article, they are...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 374
Minggu, 2023-03-19 23:39:23The Hill is a reliable source imho that Ro Khanna said this. But he is a lawyer who sits on an environmental committee. Is he a reliable source for the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 59
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:41:31scenes to help us determine which of the two biographies is more reliable... but if no reliable source has noted what the physician said, then neither should...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 213
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:45:01claimed in a reliable source is not automatically assumed to be reliable and credible simply by virtue of the source itself being reliable and credible...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 300
Jumat, 2020-07-17 02:21:24could not be verified by reliable sources (or even by unreliable sources without doing WP:SYNTH.} Either you have a reliable source that directly says...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (linguistics)
Selasa, 2026-02-17 04:06:02essay about the reliable sources for linguistics. This may include some sources which are not professional (in languages) but still reliable to be cited....
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 255
Sabtu, 2026-01-24 13:41:48January 2017 RfC, which established consensus that the Daily Mail was not a reliable source, and that its use in most Wikipedia articles was prohibited. Overturning...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 383
Minggu, 2023-12-24 10:31:09The Daily Telegraph (UK) has a "Generally reliable" rating. I would argue for a caveat that articles written by "Telegraph Reporters" are given a lower...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
Rabu, 2026-03-04 08:05:57that generate sources that may be sufficiently reliable to be cited in Wikipedia. They are no less reliable because they state critiques of society, or even...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 137
Minggu, 2023-07-09 22:15:00for Human Rights in the Operation_Pillar_of_Cloud article, which is a reliable source for the facts being presented, and whose opinion would be notable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 346
Kamis, 2023-03-16 21:26:16(talk) 18:28, 19 June 2021 (UTC) Kind of in that gray area between reliable and not reliable. The authors appear to be legitimate medical professionals and...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 304
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 03:37:17as someone who has done time on this board, that something is reliable or not reliable depending on its context. The context here is a list of sources...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 292
Selasa, 2025-09-23 19:28:34PinkNews was last discussed at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 47#Pink News. It came to my attention recently when it was used as a source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 353
Kamis, 2023-03-09 21:16:47the encyclopedia. Option 1: The source is recognized as being generally reliable. Option 2: There is no consensus or additional considerations apply. Option...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 276
Minggu, 2024-10-20 07:49:59"opinion" as if it were "reliable journalism". From W:Reliable sources: "There is consensus that The Nation is generally reliable. Most editors consider...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 356
Jumat, 2023-11-03 13:01:32Does the community think Krunoslav Draganović is a reliable source? His books have been cited in a number of articles (mostly on medieval Bosnian history)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 377
Rabu, 2025-09-03 09:29:37(in which case, we use those reliable sources) or isn't reliably attributed elsewhere (in which case, it's not reliably sourced and we shouldn't be saying...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Sources
Kamis, 2026-04-30 01:16:14Search all reliable secondary sources for professional wrestling. Search only websites dedicated to covering professional wrestling. Search only mainstream...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Television/Reliable sources
Senin, 2009-10-12 15:30:53sometimes used for television related articles. IGN - Generally considered reliable - Reason??? The Futon Critic - I've seen this one bounced back and forth...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 144
Kamis, 2026-04-16 19:27:58Is this a reliable source for argument from silence? http://www.umass.edu/wsp/history/outline/silence.html Humanpublic (talk) 21:27, 18 February 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 233
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 03:36:50obviously more reliable than any single editor. However, the question is not who is more reliable, the question is, wouldn't it be reliable enough if he...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 119
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 03:36:18consumers on 3D televisions. My question is: Would the 3D University site be a reliable source for non-controversial information, like descriptions of different...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 386
Sabtu, 2024-02-17 19:53:47state of the conversion therapy movement. While not being an existing reliable source, I believe that turning our nose at large detailed and sourced reports...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 382
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 03:38:07sites should always be preferred but I do believe this is a relevant and reliable source. What are your thoughts? It's also worth noting that this Wiki entry...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/temp
Minggu, 2017-07-23 08:27:32Wikipedia articles should use reliable published sources. This page provides guidance about how to identify these. The policy pages that discuss the need...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 186
Sabtu, 2023-04-15 00:24:20cited has no references to support it's claims. Can this be used as a reliable source? Thanks - theWOLFchild 02:23, 11 March 2015 (UTC) note: The editor...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Women artists/Reliable sources
Minggu, 2018-03-04 00:03:18This is a list of reliable sources for women artists: ULAN - Union List of Artist Names RKD - Rijksdienst voor Kunsthistorisch Documentatie (23% women)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:No original research
Kamis, 2026-05-21 08:58:52allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable source has ever been published. By this, the community means that the reliable source must have been published...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 365
Senin, 2022-02-07 11:07:38the US government surveillance of academics, writing in Counterpunch a reliable source for his finding the FBI surveilled Edward Said in the article Edward...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:New pages patrol source guide
Rabu, 2026-06-03 07:37:45information about reliable sources for use by new page reviewers when reviewing new articles. It is intended as a supplement to the reliable sources noticeboard...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Usurped sources
Rabu, 2025-07-30 22:59:25their "about" pages, with only superficial changes. None of these appear reliable. While looking into this, I found this news story from Monterey County...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Coup
Minggu, 2024-07-28 17:42:14policy, requires material added to Wikipedia to be supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources differ on naming certain events as a coup and should be...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 388
Jumat, 2023-02-10 00:57:28Is google maps a reliable source for the contents of the article U.S. Route 19 in West Virginia? Note that it is the only source on the page, everything...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 349
Jumat, 2024-07-19 03:01:41information comes from a reliable source. The words "reliable source" link further down the page to #What_counts_as_a_reliable_source, which is headed...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Potentially unreliable sources
Sabtu, 2025-12-27 19:39:49equal. The guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources gives general advice on what is and isn't a reliable source; this essay aims to analyse specific...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 372
Minggu, 2026-05-03 22:46:41source is reliable (that it meets the requirements of WP:RS). So we need consensus that it's reliable, not consensus that it's not reliable. I belabor...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 169
Jumat, 2023-03-03 02:31:00I have proposed three English-language publications as reliable sources for the statement that derivation of the word "Easter" from the name of a supposed...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requested articles/Sports
Jumat, 2026-06-05 01:17:02Please place requests in the right section, with two reliable sources and a brief description How?: Just click edit source, and compose the request as...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Header
Kamis, 2010-02-11 11:47:16Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Reliable sources. It was believed that consensus for such a merger was reached,...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 338
Senin, 2022-05-16 12:51:09that undeclared propaganda should usually be blacklisted: see Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_281#RfC: Deprecation of fake news / disinformation...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources
Rabu, 2026-06-03 21:05:36sources may also be used, provided they meet the criteria at Wikipedia:Reliable sources and WP:MOSALBUM#Critical reception. Specifically, reviews should...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 336
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 17:10:47which was passionate on both sides, they appear to have the trappings of a reliable source, but their tactics in news reporting suggest they may be publishing...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 369
Sabtu, 2025-09-27 05:25:52comment from somebody who thinks the Ukrainian version is “definitely reliable”. I may have some other source questions shortly, but that one comes up...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Reliable guy69
Senin, 2020-05-04 04:26:05Reliable guy69 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate ·...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Large scale clean-ups/Test incident
Jumat, 2018-12-28 03:05:39example of how to work this. 0 of 0 problems, 0% in article space Wikipedia:Reliable_Sources/Noticeboard#null (permanent link) 0 of 0 items resolved. Complete...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 342
Jumat, 2026-01-23 21:12:01Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_253#Are_Think_Tanks_considered_reliable_sources_for_politically_controversial_articles? Wikipedia:Reliable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Mongols/Reliable sources
Senin, 2025-10-27 17:14:37Always use reliable sources to write an article. This is important to support the three pillars of Wikipedia: verifiable, neutral point of view and no...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Guyana/Reliable sources
Kamis, 2023-12-14 07:57:51Always use reliable sources to write an article. This is important to support the three pillars of Wikipedia: verifiable, neutral point of view and no...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:CARL Medical Editing Initiative/Fall 2020/Reliable Sources
Sabtu, 2020-10-17 01:11:31Started Course Overview Practice Editing How to Edit Resources and Videos Reliable Sources Community Consensus (How to Use the Talk Pages) Track our Progress...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 308
Senin, 2023-02-27 17:14:10experienced editors that those two sources are generally acceptable as reliable sources. The former is a blanket position, the latter is a much more limited...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Record charts
Senin, 2026-01-05 20:04:43whether in prose or in standard chart tables. It provides criteria for reliable and appropriate sources, explains which charts are considered unsuitable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:References dos and don'ts
Sabtu, 2025-03-22 06:51:59Referencing is key to making Wikipedia reliable and trustworthy. Help:Referencing for beginners Help:Referencing for beginners without using templates...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 373
Jumat, 2024-10-18 00:35:19even reliable sources, are still subject to the Core Content Policies. A "Generally reliable" source is not always reliable and a "Marginally reliable" source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 327
Sabtu, 2021-02-27 05:12:00request lingers at WP:AN/RFC. Since this is a request to modify Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources, a definitive reading of the proposal is advisable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 354
Kamis, 2023-11-16 21:33:02for Option 1 by 2/3rds supermajority. Insider to be considered generally reliable for factual reporting for its original culture reporting. ~riley (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 370
Minggu, 2025-07-06 23:44:59case not reliable in context. Since every once in a while someone shows up at the Razi page to add these sources, insisting that they're reliable, I would...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 264
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:43:57Thus it seems to me it is not generally reliable.Slatersteven (talk) 16:13, 16 April 2019 (UTC) It is reliable in many contexts. When you say "we are going...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2008-06-26/Dispatches
Sabtu, 2024-01-06 07:55:41much of the Internet is the skill with which they are verified (WP:V) and reliably sourced (WP:RS); these processes are derived from policy and guideline...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 282
Jumat, 2020-01-03 10:36:02here to argue for it. The conclusion is always the same: QuackWatch is a reliable source for discussion of quacks and quackery. Guy (help!) 23:04, 2 November...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:CARL Medical Editing Initiative/Fall 2021/Reliable Sources
Senin, 2021-07-26 20:40:34Started Course Overview Practice Editing How to Edit Resources and Videos Reliable Sources Community Consensus (How to Use the Talk Pages) Track our Progress...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Attribution
Selasa, 2026-03-24 03:32:02threshold for inclusion on Wikipedia is whether material is attributable to a reliable published source, not whether it is true. Wikipedia is not the place to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 358
Selasa, 2021-11-16 11:09:37at Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Daily Wire Option 1 Generally Reliable Source Option 2 Neither generally reliable nor generally unreliable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 366
Jumat, 2026-01-23 12:20:35newspapers". However, the section is mainly on whether student media is reliable; the part on whether it can be used for notability doesn't cite a prior...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Fruit of the poisonous tree
Sabtu, 2025-09-13 13:48:39gained from a reliable source (the "fruit") was uncritically repeated from an unreliable source (the "tree") without passing through the reliable source's...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 363
Sabtu, 2022-03-26 23:58:33Wikipedian claimed that it denies the existence of Holodomor (cf. Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_355#CounterPunch_and_Al_Bawaba), yet that CounterPunch...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Children's, adult new reader, and large-print sources questionable on reliability
Kamis, 2026-01-08 19:40:36Questionable sources are likely to be deleted because they're unlikely to be reliable. Children's sources, adult new reader sources, and abridged large-print...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 341
Senin, 2021-05-31 19:39:24I want to know - can information on the knowledge panel be used as an reliable source of article for a wiki page creation? I really need to know this please...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Large scale clean-ups/archive
Jumat, 2018-12-28 03:05:53the transclusion into a link. Please summarise the outcome. Wikipedia:Reliable Sources/Noticeboard/Large scale clean-ups/Test incident 0 of 0 items resolved...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Search engine
Senin, 2026-02-02 20:17:28Video games maintains Reliable Sources for Video Games, a Google Custom Search Engine that searches sites on the video games reliable sources list. A search...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biomedical information
Senin, 2025-10-06 01:19:02Wikipedia biomedical editing Editing for medical experts Reliable sources FAQ Why MEDRS? Biomedical information Manual of style Conflicts of interest Plain...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject WikiFundi Content/Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources
Senin, 2021-10-25 01:17:52problems that Wikipedia is most criticized for is that it is not always reliable. This is true, since anybody can change most articles and add anything...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Identifying and using tertiary sources
Senin, 2026-04-27 23:22:21research § Primary, secondary and tertiary sources, and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources § Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources) include any compilation...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 333
Rabu, 2025-09-24 01:47:54issue here is the extent to which Radio Free Asia can be considered a reliable source. Editors advance arguments regarding Wikipedia’s general bias towards...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:CARL Medical Editing Initiative/Fall 2019/Reliable Sources
Jumat, 2019-11-15 09:07:39Started Course Overview Practice Editing How to Edit Resources and Videos Reliable Sources Community Consensus (How to Use the Talk Pages) Track our Progress...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/References
Sabtu, 2024-06-01 01:00:53Shortcut WP:CMC/REFWP:CMC/REF A selection of resources to help provide reliable sources and prove notability List of comics awards Category:Comics awards...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Fringe theories
Sabtu, 2026-06-06 15:08:46Statements about the truth of a theory must be based upon independent reliable sources. If discussed in an article about a mainstream idea, a theory that...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Alexa/doc
Minggu, 2019-02-17 02:47:08This template displays the "Alexa rankings" table cell at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. The template only accepts numbered parameters....
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Deprecated sources
Kamis, 2026-02-05 02:22:20editors are discouraged from citing in articles, because they fail the reliable sources guideline in nearly all circumstances. Use of these sources may...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Objective sources
Sabtu, 2024-08-31 13:41:16remember that the website, news program, and newsletter that you find reliable and often use to get information may not be viewed the same by other editors...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/Bellingcat
Minggu, 2025-10-05 04:27:33July 2014. WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 184#"Bellingcat" WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 193#Bellingcat WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Credible claim of significance
Minggu, 2025-02-02 17:30:16attributes noteworthiness, or information written about the subject in reliable sources. Wikipedia's speedy deletion criteria A7, A9 and A11 state that...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Further classification
Senin, 2026-03-23 17:46:52On the page WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources, a common classification is "No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply" (also sometimes...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/CNN
Sabtu, 2025-10-04 03:12:05sources/Noticeboard/Archive 72#Is CNN a reliable source? WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 98#CNN Poll 2011 WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 140#Russia...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-06-04/In the media
Sabtu, 2024-01-06 09:06:50Reliable or not, doctors use Wikipedia: The month of May saw significant coverage concerning the reliability of Wikipedia's medical articles. ← Back to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 367
Selasa, 2022-04-05 10:59:08editors are discouraged from citing in articles, because they fail the reliable sources guideline in nearly all circumstances.. The page also says that...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)
Selasa, 2026-06-02 13:32:23evidence that the organization or product has attracted the notice of reliable sources unrelated to the organization or product. Notability requires only...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/CNET
Minggu, 2025-11-09 18:37:11networks. WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 4#GameSpot and CNET WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 24#Media Awareness Network WP:Reliable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/The Conversation
Sabtu, 2025-10-04 14:58:05WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 99#The Conversation (website) WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 169#The Conversation WP:Reliable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/Bloomberg
Sabtu, 2025-10-04 21:36:06Lynch. WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 151#Bloomberg on Microsoft WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 226#On Bloomberg WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/The Daily Telegraph
Sabtu, 2025-10-04 14:46:46Daily Telegraph is a source that has been repeatedly discussed at the Reliable sources noticeboard. This page collects and links information about previous...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipack Africa Content/Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources
Senin, 2016-08-29 18:20:01problems that Wikipedia is most criticized for is that it is not always reliable. This is true, since anybody can change most articles and add anything...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Alexa
Minggu, 2019-02-17 01:38:59[purge] This template displays the "Alexa rankings" table cell at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. The template only accepts numbered parameters...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Women's Health/Reliable sources
Selasa, 2024-01-16 22:39:59Given below is the list of some reliable sources related to women's health. For more resources related to women's health, please go to The Wikipedia Library...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/Climate Feedback
Sabtu, 2025-10-04 03:11:43Climate Feedback is a source that has been repeatedly discussed at the Reliable sources noticeboard. This page collects and links information about previous...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2023-01-01/In the media
Rabu, 2026-02-04 01:55:21Odd bedfellows, Elon and Jimbo, reliable sources for divorces, and more: Sometimes you need to read more than just the headlines! ← Back to Contents View...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Reliable guy69/Archive
Senin, 2020-05-04 04:26:05Reliable guy69 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate ·...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/Debrett's
Sabtu, 2025-10-04 03:31:28Overflow Debrett's is a source that has been repeatedly discussed at the Reliable sources noticeboard. This page collects and links information about previous...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 401
Kamis, 2023-10-26 20:20:56Sometimes, even generally reliable newspapers use bylines like "News desk" or "Web desk", etc. Does it mean the published content is prepared by several...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 416
Sabtu, 2024-05-11 15:32:03Someone asked this before in Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 408#Passionfruit / Passionfru.it but they received no replies. This was a source...
Click to read more »