DOKUMEN123.COM

English idioms, many of which should be avoided. Shortcuts MOS:RELTIMEMOS:RELTIME MOS:REALTIMEMOS:REALTIME Absolute specifications of time are preferred...

largest toy company by revenue." (See: MOS:RELTIME) Second paragraph: strike all three "currently"s (See: MOS:RELTIME) "Bandai Namco currently owns former developer...

per MOS:IMAGES Words like "currently" are generally to be avoided per WP:RELTIME Same goes for "recent" The article's prose is a mess and chunky, as well...

singling out only six of them in the lead feels quite arbitrary. Keep MOS:RELTIME in mind for things like "four million copies sold to date". At least give...

today". The discussion came to no conclusion about specific changes for MOS:RELTIME/MOS:DATED/WP:ASOF. An unfortunate crash for trains and notability. A new...

(MOS:EUPHEMISM), clichés (MOS:CLICHE) and rapidly dated expressions (MOS:RELTIME) are all to be found here. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Article message boxes...

(talk) 02:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC) Don't use words like "current" per WP:RELTIME  Done--Astros4477 (talk) 02:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC) WP:DASH concerns...

least be renamed to Mercy (2017 film) because the current title is MOS:RELTIME. KAP03Talk 19:22, 3 January 2017 (UTC) Page, Ellen (September 19, 2016)...

about "to date" in this part, (three times in his career to date). Per MOS:RELTIME, it is a word choice that is best avoided when possible. Would there a...

and adjusted the "Airlines and destinations" tables to respect WP:V and MOS:RELTIME. — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 12:59, 25 September 2017 (UTC)...

despite the cites. Can this be refined? "...in recent years": is dated. WP:RELTIME  Done. --Triggerhippie4 (talk) 04:30, 27 April 2012 (UTC) "A Social Survey...

violate WP:RELTIME. It says that words like "current" shouldn't be used, I see this used lots of places in the list, including the name even WP:RELTIME doesn't...

"Ref." to "Ref(s)" since most rows have more than one reference. Per MOS:RELTIME, the phrase "To date" isn't recommended. Consider adding that Leslie Waggener...

Also includes the phrase "to date" which doesn't help with Wikipedia:RELTIME Paragraph 3 mentions BRMB which will be meaningless to anyone that hasn't...

al Aire is a contemporary pop album" - this can be outdated so, per MOS:RELTIME, just remove "contemporary". By the way, the sentence that it starts has...

writing something like "Koneru Sridhar became mayor in [year]" per MOS:RELTIME. for "an estimated population of 18 lakhs" - Western conversion should...

largest toy company by revenue." (See: MOS:RELTIME) Second paragraph: strike all three "currently"s (See: MOS:RELTIME) "Bandai Namco currently owns former developer...

Health in North Korea - this is badly sourced not to mention ignoring RELTIME in key spots. Importantly there is not much independent information on...

per MOS:IMAGES Words like "currently" are generally to be avoided per WP:RELTIME Same goes for "recent" The article's prose is a mess and chunky, as well...

this. "March 19 in Latin America" same as above "new short film" per MOS:RELTIME, this will become (or already is) inaccurate Home media This needs a source...

discussion/Log/2016 March 31#This year. These type of redirects go against WP:RELTIME, though as a MOS guideline it isn't really applicable to this. Varies with...

Remove 'current' from the last sentence and replace it with 'as of', per WP:RELTIME. Hindustan times --> Hindustan Times. How "mapsofindia.com" is a RS? m...

saying "modern", I'd try to use a term that doesn't become outdated per WP:RELTIME The source really wasn't more specific than that, unfortunately. It seems...

decades. He won his" --> "his last, winning his" "his last (to date)" MOS:RELTIME "Juan Pablo Montoya had to wait the longest time between his maiden victory...

violate WP:RELTIME. It says that words like "current" shouldn't be used, I see this used lots of places in the list, including the name even WP:RELTIME doesn't...

curly Fixed-- Astros4477 (Talk) 19:11, 26 February 2013 (UTC) I believe WP:RELTIME is against the use of "today" or simlar words Fixed-- Astros4477 (Talk)...

needs to be either corrected to the past tense or {{asof}}'d (see WP:RELTIME) so that in the hypothetical case that nobody does any more edits, the...

links should be repeated again Don't use words like "recently", as per WP:RELTIME "multiple reviewers" you are referring to "critics"? "That same year he"...

It is "ongoing", and those words aren't suppose to be used, as per WP:RELTIME. It's fine like this, in my opinion. In fact, further down it says it is...

Rmhermen (talk) 01:16, 21 January 2013 (UTC) Well we can't put current per WP:RELTIME.-- Astros4477 (Talk) 02:23, 21 January 2013 (UTC) We could potentially...

October 2017 (UTC) What is the deal with crazy people today? An IP made a RELTIME violating change, I reverted, a person I reckoned was the same did the...

Resolved objection from Cloudz679 I would say that per WP:RELTIME, wording such as "the most recent recipient" should be avoided. Otherwise looks good...

Rmhermen (talk) 01:16, 21 January 2013 (UTC) Well we can't put current per WP:RELTIME.-- Astros4477 (Talk) 02:23, 21 January 2013 (UTC) We could potentially...

23 August 2015 (UTC) Delete per what is expressed at WP:DATED and WP:RELTIME, as well as above.—Godsy(TALKCONT) 09:47, 23 August 2015 (UTC) Delete as...

11#Last year → 2007 as a precedent. These type of redirects go against WP:RELTIME, though as a MOS guideline it isn't really applicable to this.—Godsy(TALKCONT)...

removing the word "currently" from the article, as per WP:PRECISELANG, WP:RELTIME, and even more directly explained at Wikipedia:MOS#Current. You (Evlekis)...

appears to be. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 20:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC) MOS:DATED and MOS:RELTIME advise against words like "soon" in contexts like this. – Arms & Hearts...

unreliable sources removed, some meaningful compression should be done, some WP:RELTIME copyediting is needed, but deletion is not justified: WP:NOTPAPER - Wikipedia...

of whether or not to use this construct in an article, please see MOS:RELTIME. Basically, it appears that you should not use it without an "as of" of...

be timeless. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 09:49, 9 July 2018 (UTC) MOS:RELTIME, MOS:CURRENT, WP:ASOF. Nanonic (talk) 10:05, 9 July 2018 (UTC) Resolved...

Remove 'current' from the last sentence and replace it with 'as of', per WP:RELTIME. Hindustan times --> Hindustan Times. How "mapsofindia.com" is a RS? m...

comments after my peer review of this list: Don't use "currently" per WP:RELTIME Done--Astros4477 (talk) 22:31, 27 November 2012 (UTC) "Standing but not...

in an archive somewhere) JeffUK 22:16, 14 January 2023 (UTC) I knew I'd seen it somewhere MOS:RELTIME covers this. JeffUK 22:20, 14 January 2023 (UTC)...

the line remains today. – A specific date is strongly preferred per MOS:RELTIME. The last year mentioned in the body is 2017. 2017 is the date Karr published...

context in just one sentence. Also, "currently" should be avoided; see WP:RELTIME. "As of 2010" or something similar would work here. Got it. Reworded "images...

com/" remove the slash at the end Done. Don't use "currently" as per WP:RELTIME Done. Same goes for "recent" Done. In the list, you use "£", can you make...

{{Clarifyspan}}, {{What span}} → {{Clarify span}} {{Timeframe}}, {{Timeframe?}}, {{Reltime}} → {{Clarify timeframe}} {{Coi-source}}, {{Conflicted source}}, {{Conflicted...

(talk) 01:12, 3 November 2012 (UTC) Don't use words like "newest" per WP:RELTIME Fixed.--Dom497 (talk) 01:12, 3 November 2012 (UTC) ", etc" shouldn't be...

any '''tAD''' (talk) 03:28, 3 April 2016 (UTC) Delete. Not sure if WP:RELTIME applies, but no need for the maintenance burden which nobody actually carries...

somewhere. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 21:42, 22 June 2014 (UTC) Yes, it's in WP:RELTIME. You can mark up these statements with {{when}}. AutoWikiBrowser could...

to me? 01:56, 19 December 2016 (UTC) I think this is covered under WP:RELTIME "Absolute specifications of time are preferred to relative constructions...

global conflicts. Second Cold War does have a few sources, but has a WP:RELTIME problem and to me seems somewhat too WP:CRYSTALly for this navbox template...

Uanfala (talk) 11:04, 4 July 2016 (UTC) Per the spirit of MOS:DATED and WP:RELTIME, "Recent" and "current" redirects are generally not a good idea. However...

(edit conflict) @Curb Safe Charmer: It might fall under MOS:EUPHEMISM, WP:RELTIME or maybe in some way even MOS:SURVIVEDBY. It doesn't sound very sound very...

of "now" in this part, (that is now a signature of the brand), per MOS:RELTIME. I wonder if this could be substituted with something like, (that has become...

Mortee, Xaosflux, HyperGaruda, Ymblanter, BrightR, and Tazerdadog: I call "reltime" on the section title! ;-) But seriously, it does end in a few days, and...

which one should be leave in the article fall or Autumn? Actually, per WP:RELTIME we aren't supposed to use either, except that if sources use those terms...

Health in North Korea - this is badly sourced not to mention ignoring RELTIME in key spots. Importantly there is not much independent information on...

least be renamed to Mercy (2017 film) because the current title is MOS:RELTIME. KAP03Talk 19:22, 3 January 2017 (UTC) Page, Ellen (September 19, 2016)...

planetary scientists have criticized" Should reword "recently" per WP:RELTIME link ammonia; link methane on 1st occurrence "would not cause a boiling...

needs to be either corrected to the past tense or {{asof}}'d (see WP:RELTIME) so that in the hypothetical case that nobody does any more edits, the...

unreliable sources removed, some meaningful compression should be done, some WP:RELTIME copyediting is needed, but deletion is not justified: WP:NOTPAPER - Wikipedia...

published was…" – I know you'll keep an eye on it but this bumps up against WP:RELTIME if not watched in the future. Probably best to delete altogether. Cassiantotalk...

experts rank his presidential achievements well below average"..... see WP:RELTIME regarding "today", and I'm not sure "experts" is the best word choice Changed...

11:07, 19 May 2012 (UTC) The guideline you ask for already exists: WP:RELTIME. The main hurdle such a bot would have to overcome is described in WP:CONTEXTBOT...

exactly when that portion of the article was last updated. (See also WP:RELTIME.) So you wouldn't want to say something like Sarah recently received an...

about the "current airline destinations" point – seems to me like a MOS:RELTIME violation. I'm also interested in your point about scaling back the tables...

currently divides ===>>> she has since divided (avoid "currently" per MOS:RELTIME) Overall I don't share the concerns above about not using game reports...

with the content, namely "current". Nothing is "current" in WP per WP:RELTIME. This is also vague. What does "important" mean? High quality sources that...

month" part reads a bit strangely. I wouldn't say it's a violation of MOS:RELTIME, as most readers would assumedly be able to ascertain that "next month"...

Resolved objection from Cloudz679 I would say that per WP:RELTIME, wording such as "the most recent recipient" should be avoided. Otherwise looks good...

entire article? Not in my mind. The reason the date is mentioned is per MOS:RELTIME. I'm certainly not saying those aren't scheduled locations; I'm saying...

use for 9 months." -- this seems to come out of nowhere. Recent (see WP:RELTIME) He emphasised the findings? Relative to what? Tweaked the sentence intro...

great difficulties with general Wikipedia policies including SYNTH, OR, WP:RELTIME, WP:RS and WP:WEASEL.) More specifically, there were not any other arguments...

17:50, 21 October 2012 (UTC) Don't use words like "currently", as per WP:RELTIME Removed. AARON• TALK Could you now add "As of ..., " instead? TBrandley...

There are some uses of "now" and "today" which could conflict with MOS:RELTIME, but I think there is a case for IAR if the underlying sources don't specify...

avoided as a style issue (we have guidance about that: MOS:CURRENT, MOS:RELTIME,...) See also elaborate example I was writing for comparison below ("ec"...

"consisting", which SNUGGUMS removed due to WP:RELTIME violations I think the second sentence of WP:RELTIME is what you need: something like 'Her ongoing...

15:33, 30 November 2015 (UTC) "each of the past six decades"..... see WP:RELTIME  Done "She is the only artist to date to have a number-one single on a...

well as", or something Done Don't use words like "current", as per WP:RELTIME, it should be replaced with with "As of ..., the president is", or something...

entire article? Not in my mind. The reason the date is mentioned is per MOS:RELTIME. I'm certainly not saying those aren't scheduled locations; I'm saying...

com/" remove the slash at the end Done. Don't use "currently" as per WP:RELTIME Done. Same goes for "recent" Done. In the list, you use "£", can you make...

paleogeographical affinities" should be cited with author and/or year given MOS:RELTIME. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 19:00, 11 July 2021 (UTC) "The Mediterranean...

23:16, 15 November 2012 (UTC) Words like "so far" shouldn't be used per WP:RELTIME, just remove Done. Buggie111 (talk) 23:16, 15 November 2012 (UTC) "2009...

"Having still held only temporary rank". This is specifically not a WP:RELTIME issue (like most uses of "now" would be), but it may be unwieldy to use...

links should be repeated again Don't use words like "recently", as per WP:RELTIME "multiple reviewers" you are referring to "critics"? "That same year he"...

comments after my peer review of this list: Don't use "currently" per WP:RELTIME Done--Astros4477 (talk) 22:31, 27 November 2012 (UTC) "Standing but not...

(talk) 01:12, 3 November 2012 (UTC) Don't use words like "newest" per WP:RELTIME Fixed.--Dom497 (talk) 01:12, 3 November 2012 (UTC) ", etc" shouldn't be...

quoting here? Fixed Most recently ---> find alternative phrasing, as per MOS:RELTIME Fixed Between 1986 and 1987 ---> this sounds a bit odd to my foreign ear...

great difficulties with general Wikipedia policies including SYNTH, OR, WP:RELTIME, WP:RS and WP:WEASEL.) More specifically, there were not any other arguments...

the lede, as the self-sourced sentence about where he is "currently" (WP:RELTIME yuck) affiliated, is. Alexbrn (talk) 13:33, 5 January 2022 (UTC) FYI, going...

 Carptrash (talk) 17:54, 20 June 2021 (UTC) Carptrash This falls foul of MOS:RELTIME, so instead of tagging it, please determine the specific years and substitute...

the courts from court cases. As for the ranking, please follow the WP:RELTIME MoS guidelines. So instead of "The Pirate Bay was {When?} one of the top...

experts rank his presidential achievements well below average"..... see WP:RELTIME regarding "today", and I'm not sure "experts" is the best word choice Changed...

this notice. Thanks, J947 ‡ edits 07:04, 4 April 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:RELTIME. --~2026-22178-33 (talk) 21:31, 10 April 2026 (UTC) That's a guideline...

context in just one sentence. Also, "currently" should be avoided; see WP:RELTIME. "As of 2010" or something similar would work here. Got it. Reworded "images...

Special:Diff/1322961334 removes the wording "in recent decades" because of MOS:RELTIME, according to the talk page explanation, to which Nerd271 failed to provide...

planetary scientists have criticized" Should reword "recently" per WP:RELTIME link ammonia; link methane on 1st occurrence "would not cause a boiling...

currently divides ===>>> she has since divided (avoid "currently" per MOS:RELTIME) Overall I don't share the concerns above about not using game reports...

paleogeographical affinities" should be cited with author and/or year given MOS:RELTIME. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 19:00, 11 July 2021 (UTC) "The Mediterranean...

UndercoverClassicist (talk) 17:51, 17 March 2023 (UTC) "more recently": check MOS:RELTIME. Modussiccandi (talk) 16:34, 17 March 2023 (UTC) Changed to 'were later...

curly Fixed-- Astros4477 (Talk) 19:11, 26 February 2013 (UTC) I believe WP:RELTIME is against the use of "today" or simlar words Fixed-- Astros4477 (Talk)...

use for 9 months." -- this seems to come out of nowhere. Recent (see WP:RELTIME) He emphasised the findings? Relative to what? Tweaked the sentence intro...

do with "now credits Krayzie Bone and Wish Bone individually" per MOS:RELTIME when this could become outdated Changed from time to fixed location ("on...

name) "now considered one of the greatest war films ever made"..... see WP:RELTIME "anchored by another winning performance" should have "anchored" start...

doesn't make sense here" "rmv deprecated, ambiguous "however" per MOS:RELTIME" Removed unnecessary word Removed the word "However," from the beginning...

(talk) 02:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC) Don't use words like "current" per WP:RELTIME  Done--Astros4477 (talk) 02:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC) WP:DASH concerns...

(links) Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Words_to_watch (exists?) No 614 MOS:RELTIME (links) Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Words_to_watch (exists?) No 615 MOS:SCAREQUOTES...

despite the cites. Can this be refined? "...in recent years": is dated. WP:RELTIME  Done. --Triggerhippie4 (talk) 04:30, 27 April 2012 (UTC) "A Social Survey...

Also includes the phrase "to date" which doesn't help with Wikipedia:RELTIME Paragraph 3 mentions BRMB which will be meaningless to anyone that hasn't...

JPN 174 ULINK 174 Reltime 174 HIDE 174 HIDING 174 CLICHE 174 UNDERLINK 174 CONFUSE 174 CONFUSED 174 IDIOM 174 TERRORIST 174 RELTIME 174 JA 174 NOHIDE...

It is "ongoing", and those words aren't suppose to be used, as per WP:RELTIME. It's fine like this, in my opinion. In fact, further down it says it is...

published was…" – I know you'll keep an eye on it but this bumps up against WP:RELTIME if not watched in the future. Probably best to delete altogether. Cassiantotalk...

about "to date" in this part, (three times in his career to date). Per MOS:RELTIME, it is a word choice that is best avoided when possible. Would there a...

decades. He won his" --> "his last, winning his" "his last (to date)" MOS:RELTIME "Juan Pablo Montoya had to wait the longest time between his maiden victory...

the line remains today. – A specific date is strongly preferred per MOS:RELTIME. The last year mentioned in the body is 2017. 2017 is the date Karr published...

"Ref." to "Ref(s)" since most rows have more than one reference. Per MOS:RELTIME, the phrase "To date" isn't recommended. Consider adding that Leslie Waggener...

like the underlying scam is something called Swifin which is "built on" Reltime. They appear to be handing out money (fake or real) to set up silly currencies...

doesn't make sense here" "rmv deprecated, ambiguous "however" per MOS:RELTIME" Removed unnecessary word Removed the word "However," from the beginning...

do with "now credits Krayzie Bone and Wish Bone individually" per MOS:RELTIME when this could become outdated Changed from time to fixed location ("on...

use of the present perfect tense ("has been [mayor]") due to possible WP:RELTIME issues which could make the statement false in the future. If this is a...

(UTC) Random IP User, you can't use 'forthcoming' because that is a WP:RELTIME problem. (I.e., that word itself will become the confusing word seen as...

where it is the only subsection. Awkward phrasing and violations of MOS:RELTIME can be handled by script, perhaps with "The United States Census Bureau...

than more general relative time expressions for the reasons given in WP:RELTIME; however, even more specific references like "As of XXXX" can still become...

"consisting", which SNUGGUMS removed due to WP:RELTIME violations I think the second sentence of WP:RELTIME is what you need: something like 'Her ongoing...

There are some uses of "now" and "today" which could conflict with MOS:RELTIME, but I think there is a case for IAR if the underlying sources don't specify...

UndercoverClassicist (talk) 17:51, 17 March 2023 (UTC) "more recently": check MOS:RELTIME. Modussiccandi (talk) 16:34, 17 March 2023 (UTC) Changed to 'were later...

quoting here? Fixed Most recently ---> find alternative phrasing, as per MOS:RELTIME Fixed Between 1986 and 1987 ---> this sounds a bit odd to my foreign ear...

sales would still exist, making it also an issue of relevance (and MOS:RELTIME for the Draugen edit). I don't want to be in an edit war until one of us...

"Having still held only temporary rank". This is specifically not a WP:RELTIME issue (like most uses of "now" would be), but it may be unwieldy to use...

November 2025 (UTC)  Done - "recently" in this context also breaches MOS:RELTIME. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 03:26, 26 November 2025 (UTC)...

Without any context, this may simply be an editor (clumsily) applying MOS:RELTIME. The "current" MLA is listed and then removed, however, that MLA was only...

of "now" in this part, (that is now a signature of the brand), per MOS:RELTIME. I wonder if this could be substituted with something like, (that has become...