Search Results: Wikipedia:RELISTBIAS


Wikipedia:Relist bias
Sabtu, 2026-05-09 21:17:26

not an encyclopedia article or a Wikipedia policy, as it has not been reviewed by the community. Shortcuts WP:RBIASWP:RBIAS WP:RELISTBIASWP:RELISTBIAS...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar eclipse of October 19, 1808
Selasa, 2025-12-16 11:43:02

vote); and I don't see why this was relisted, other than maybe some WP:RELISTBIAS. (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:51, 12 June 2022...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alain Baudet
Jumat, 2025-12-12 02:01:33

WP:NOQUORUM. If considering an NAC of this discussion, please bear WP:RELISTBIAS in mind. GirthSummit (blether) 17:33, 27 July 2020 (UTC) Delete article...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taha Hussain
Jumat, 2025-12-12 17:40:45

hope that in a week's time, anyone considering making a NAC will bear RELISTBIAS in mind. GirthSummit (blether) 12:43, 23 February 2020 (UTC) Delete Fails...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Italian American Foundation
Jumat, 2025-12-12 13:21:34

2020 (UTC) Delete I don't see why this was relisted, except maybe as WP:RELISTBIAS. The keep !vote is very weak and the sources provided do not show GNG:...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Eddie891
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 03:46:54

consensus. Even relisting a discussion could be a poor choice, see WP:RELISTBIAS. In response to the second part: that's a bit more complicated. As is...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1006
Sabtu, 2023-03-04 00:49:46

AFDs, specifically as it pertains to relisting per WP:NOQUORUM and WP:RELISTBIAS. Today after asking SS49 a final time to stop clerking, TonyBallioni also...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive329
Minggu, 2023-02-05 03:47:17

Eversole, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilgal, Kentucky is a classic WP:RELISTBIAS example, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wofai Fada is more relist bias...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive971
Selasa, 2024-05-21 06:44:53

ansh666 07:21, 14 December 2017 (UTC) @Ansh666: This is related to WP:RELISTBIAS, but it's understandable if the person (non Admin) clearly tries his best...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive983
Rabu, 2022-05-04 05:21:49

18:59, 7 May 2018 (UTC) Yes, but IMO they generally shouldn't per WP:RELISTBIAS. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:59, 7 May 2018 (UTC) I make sure to avoid relist...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 173
Kamis, 2023-02-09 15:43:03

potential to cause time to be wasted in a DRV or a follow-up AfD. See also WP:RELISTBIAS for a similar situation. Mz7 (talk) 19:33, 6 May 2022 (UTC) Was going...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 January 20
Jumat, 2023-03-03 18:57:51

SOFTDELETE discussion Jovanmilic97, what happened to SOFTDELETE? See RELISTBIAS.∯WBGconverse 16:50, 21 January 2019 (UTC) Winged Blades of Godric From...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of giant animals in fiction (2nd nomination)
Rabu, 2025-12-03 06:19:05

and the last relist was about the worst and most blatant example of WP:RELISTBIAS I've seen in recent memory. If we're being completely fair, the first...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 June 12
Senin, 2022-06-20 20:56:17

vote); and I don't see why this was relisted, other than maybe some WP:RELISTBIAS. (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:51, 12 June 2022...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 July 23
Sabtu, 2024-07-13 00:50:48

WP:NOQUORUM. If considering an NAC of this discussion, please bear WP:RELISTBIAS in mind. GirthSummit (blether) 17:33, 27 July 2020 (UTC) Delete article...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 June 25
Sabtu, 2020-07-04 05:10:56

2020 (UTC) Delete I don't see why this was relisted, except maybe as WP:RELISTBIAS. The keep !vote is very weak and the sources provided do not show GNG:...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/AmericanAir88
Selasa, 2025-01-14 10:47:47

[10] in light of WP:NOQUORUM (WP:SOFTDELETE), WP:RELIST, WP:NACD, and WP:RELISTBIAS ? A: Relisting is an important area of the Articles for Deletion sector...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 February 21
Jumat, 2022-07-22 09:57:46

hope that in a week's time, anyone considering making a NAC will bear RELISTBIAS in mind. GirthSummit (blether) 12:43, 23 February 2020 (UTC) Delete Fails...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 August 23
Kamis, 2026-01-22 04:53:43

and the last relist was about the worst and most blatant example of WP:RELISTBIAS I've seen in recent memory. If we're being completely fair, the first...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bollywood Dreams
Rabu, 2025-12-10 03:18:23

SOFTDELETE discussion Jovanmilic97, what happened to SOFTDELETE? See RELISTBIAS.∯WBGconverse 16:50, 21 January 2019 (UTC) Winged Blades of Godric From...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Closure requests/Archive 27
Minggu, 2025-01-12 21:16:02

Concur on first point. As to the latter, see WP:RELIST and point 2 of WP:RELISTBIAS; which though concerned with deletion-discussion; is pretty clear on the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2021 April
Rabu, 2021-03-31 07:03:56

argument for in". Other essays giving caution about AfD NACs, such as WP:RELISTBIAS, explicitly support no consensus NACs. I've commented before to Aseleste...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2019 May
Selasa, 2019-04-30 07:03:10

been to delete all along. @Lubbad85: Do you understand the concept of WP:RELISTBIAS and how it tends to happen when the consensus is in favour of deletion...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2019 May 16
Kamis, 2021-08-19 18:20:00

been to delete all along. @Lubbad85: Do you understand the concept of WP:RELISTBIAS and how it tends to happen when the consensus is in favour of deletion...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2021 April 28
Jumat, 2021-05-07 16:08:32

argument for in". Other essays giving caution about AfD NACs, such as WP:RELISTBIAS, explicitly support no consensus NACs. I've commented before to Aseleste...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Goldsztajn
Minggu, 2025-04-20 08:03:26

discussions, but subsequently held back from doing that after reading WP:RELISTBIAS and began doing non-admin closes where I felt there was little if no ambiguity...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive350
Kamis, 2023-07-20 01:20:00

and controversial decisions and, less formally, also recognizes that WP:RELISTBIAS exists. If this editor isn't able to make those distinctions - and the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1250
Jumat, 2025-03-21 03:35:06

discussion/Log/2025 March 2#Category:Beni Alfons). I also commend you for avoiding WP:RELISTBIAS; it is a common pitfall that you have avoided. And as a very minor nitpick...

Click to read more »