Search Results: Wikipedia:QUICKFAIL


Wikipedia:Good article criteria
Selasa, 2026-05-19 10:40:46

Shortcuts WP:GA?WP:GA? WP:GACRWP:GACR WP:WIAGAWP:WIAGA The good article criteria are the six standards by which a good article nomination (GAN) may be...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Failed log/February 2010
Kamis, 2021-01-14 10:15:01

nomination title "UE II" submarines? --PresN 06:22, 8 February 2010 (UTC) Quickfail - nomination does not include all articles, no attempt to notify the main...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/August 2023
Senin, 2025-12-15 11:55:36

(90+) (quickfail) Y valid quickfail — Golden talk 20:48, 19 August 2023 (UTC) Armadale railway station, Melbourne (982 words) (90+) (quickfail) Y valid...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Music of Dominica/1
Rabu, 2023-01-18 19:35:37

found Result: Significant citation issues mean that the article meets the quickfail criteria, and thus should be delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:35...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/South Park (season 1)/archive1
Kamis, 2021-01-14 10:47:19

guidelines for an FT. The image is also not free. --PresN 02:11, 5 February 2010 (UTC) Quickfail - per Nergaal - rst20xx (talk) 13:00, 5 February 2010 (UTC)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/History of poison/1
Sabtu, 2024-10-05 20:51:31

criterion 2b, and satisfies criterion 3 (and arguably criterion 1) for a quickfail. UndercoverClassicist T·C 13:51, 5 October 2024 (UTC) Looks like an old...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Robbie Williams/1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 10:55:47

was a quickfail that was quickfailed because there was a legitimate clean up tag in the article. Which is still there as of this comment. Quickfails (legitimate...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/B. J. Prager/1
Senin, 2010-10-11 07:03:32

Completely and unequivocally improper quickfail. Courcelles 03:57, 5 October 2010 (UTC) Overturn and relist. Quickfail was improper; needs a full review....

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Manda Best/1
Senin, 2023-02-27 21:40:26

decision to quickfail the initial GAN. The reviewer cited the article's lack of references in the lead and plot section as reasons for the quickfail, but per...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Sinhala script/1
Selasa, 2023-06-27 02:14:55

Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review Result: Close to quickfail level. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:14, 26 June 2023 (UTC) GA from...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut/2
Minggu, 2022-03-06 12:52:19

17 March 2011 (UTC) Agreed, renomination would the best course as the quickfail was in November last year. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:43, 17 March 2011 (UTC)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Monaco Grand Prix/1
Minggu, 2019-04-28 01:50:24

throughout the article against unsourced content. That would probably be a quickfail if I GA reviewed it today. I'm not sure how to fix it all - can anyone...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Satish Dhawan Space Centre launches/archive1
Sabtu, 2013-04-13 17:01:05

India's Satish Dhawan Space Centre - Jayadevp13 09:33, 7 April 2013 (UTC) Quickfail. The nomination is premature. The article has unformatted refs and an...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Twitter/1
Kamis, 2023-07-13 19:32:39

recent review Result: Valid cleanup banners remain on the article, meeting quickfail criteria. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:32, 13 July 2023 (UTC) The last...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Team Fortress 2/1
Selasa, 2023-03-21 23:11:40

--The1337gamer (talk) 11:55, 8 August 2015 (UTC) Delist Article arguably meets the quickfail criteria. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 14:22, 10 August 2015 (UTC) Delist...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Syria/1
Jumat, 2025-02-14 08:31:49

you meant to nominate at GAN, but I would suggest against it. This is a quickfail due to large chunks of uncited text. CMD (talk) 00:39, 14 February 2025...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Greenville Bridge/1
Jumat, 2025-11-14 05:03:45

in the lead and history section. If this were a nominee, I might not quickfail it, but I would definitely raise a lot of issues that would take a while...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ulnar collateral ligament (elbow)/archive1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 05:07:04

to assess readiness. --Andy Walsh (talk) 16:41, 1 November 2010 (UTC) Quickfail, please, before pile-on: Wikipedia:Peer review/Ulnar collateral ligament...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (film)/1
Minggu, 2018-02-11 10:58:15

incomplete. - Brojam (talk) 22:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC) Delist per WP:Quickfail #3 (would have needed a tag when nominated) and WP:GA? #3a. I was annoyed...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Breakout (Miley Cyrus song)/1
Senin, 2023-02-27 21:41:16

checkmark. Tell the authors what. Nothing in this process- other than a quickfail- can be done in under half an hour.Bradjamesbrown (talk) 22:55, 2 January...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Mac Pro/1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 10:54:06

situation, please do so. Otherwise I think this should be delisted as quickfail GAR, but given that there's no consensus about the state of the article...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/German Type UB I submarines/archive1
Rabu, 2025-08-27 13:47:34

nomination title "UE II" submarines? --PresN 06:22, 8 February 2010 (UTC) Quickfail - nomination does not include all articles, no attempt to notify the main...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Gardein/1
Rabu, 2021-08-11 06:45:24

this is a pretty weak article to have the badge -- I'd be inclined to quickfail it were I the reviewer, or at least go for a very "we're going to do significant...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Sienna Guillory/1
Senin, 2019-04-29 17:27:54

citations are needed. If this was nominated for GAN in its current state, I'd quickfail it. Freikorp (talk) 08:44, 25 March 2018 (UTC) Thanks for getting involved...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Violet goby/archive1
Minggu, 2009-05-17 17:00:11

I saw up at WP:GAN; I suggest you remove it from the queue to avoid a quickfail: article should be renamed to Gobioides broussonneti (specific epithet...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Project Chanology/1
Jumat, 2022-03-04 14:13:23

February 2008 (UTC) Relist for now The delisting was initially based on a quickfail edit conflict, but those criteria do not apply to the article. While it...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Daft Punk/archive1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 03:20:35

of other featured articles. Mechonis (talk) 17:48, 27 April 2013 (UTC) quickfail Setting up this FAC is the editor's first and only edits here. Several...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/History of Puerto Rico/archive1
Senin, 2022-03-07 13:40:38

Insufficient density of citations - numerous unreferenced paragraph - quickfail criteria for a new nomination. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/October 2020
Senin, 2025-12-15 12:07:24

Eddie891 Talk Work 23:00, 31 October 2020 (UTC) President of Austria (quickfail) Y -- Eddie891 Talk Work 23:00, 31 October 2020 (UTC) Wizards (Middle-earth)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Operation Barbarossa
Minggu, 2015-07-26 09:06:41

- @WP:MILHIST coordinators: this looks to me to be a candidate for a quickfail. There is a huge amount of high quality academic material on this subject...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/If He Hollers, Let Him Go! (film)/archive1
Senin, 2025-04-21 04:06:01

you know that i still consider this a start class article, and would quickfail it if it appeared at good article review. for instance, the plot is just...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Whitney High School (Rocklin, California)/1
Sabtu, 2025-11-22 11:32:40

fail per WP:GAFAIL? cookiemonster755 (talk) 15:35, 27 October 2025 (UTC) Quickfails are explicitly for GANs, not GARs. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:29...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/History of Tamil Nadu/archive1
Senin, 2022-03-07 13:40:40

Insufficient density of citations - numerous unreferenced paragraph - quickfail criteria for a new nomination.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Washington Park, Chicago/archive1
Kamis, 2021-01-14 10:53:53

the first - see here for the latest on this. Also, the reason for the quickfail can be seen in the talk page history ;) rst20xx (talk) 19:26, 3 January...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/June 2022
Senin, 2025-12-15 11:52:31

Articles reviewed: 0 Old nominations reviewed: 0 Greece-Turkey relations (Quickfail) Y (t · c) buidhe 17:50, 1 June 2022 (UTC) @User:MrLinkinPark333 If I...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates/Sunflower Slow Drag
Sabtu, 2024-03-02 02:07:59

samples. I am aware that ragtime is not orchestral, but this nom may be a quickfail anyways since the band has no piano, which may be essential to ragtime...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/R v R/1
Senin, 2024-12-09 06:38:06

my view (and other editors at WP:LAW) is OR. I would almost certainly quickfail this article if it were brought to GAN today. voorts (talk/contributions)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Recruitment Centre/Recruiter Central/Archives/Ugog Nizdast
Rabu, 2014-01-15 23:09:10

identified. A "quickfail" is when you simply fail the article right away. These are relatively rare. There are only three valid reason to quickfail an article...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Canon EOS 100/1
Selasa, 2022-05-17 11:49:33

see why this article should not have them, hence i support the original quickfail. I didn't see the original reviewer asking for multiple cites for each...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Gruban v Booth/1
Rabu, 2023-07-05 18:07:15

criteria one. Regardless, were I reviewing this article for GA I would quickfail due to only one source. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:04, 27 June 2023...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Battle of Pandu/archive1
Senin, 2024-05-27 20:33:53

paraphrasing in the article, which would make the article eligible for a quickfail at WP:GAN. See the following comparison with Javaid 2023: Article: "The...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/Cameroon/archive1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 05:19:47

--Rschen7754 19:41, 2 June 2013 (UTC) *Delist and as Rschen says, would quickfail a GA review due to the honking great {{refimprove}} at the top of the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/County Route 149 (Sullivan County, New York)/1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 10:51:27

links, lead issues, notability, and too much detail. None of which are quickfail criteria, None of which are even a reason to fail an article in the first...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/Sylvanus Morley/archive1
Senin, 2022-03-07 13:40:56

Insufficient density of citations - numerous unreferenced paragraph - quickfail criteria for a new nomination. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murders of Keona Holley and Justin Johnson
Senin, 2024-09-23 08:25:32

tagged {{Notability}} by Lettler (courtesy ping), which would make it a quickfail at GAN. Of course, I wouldn't have created the article if I didn't think...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/November 2013
Jumat, 2013-12-20 21:02:51

Insufficient density of citations - numerous unreferenced paragraph - quickfail criteria for a new nomination. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Failed log/January 2009
Kamis, 2021-01-14 10:15:07

the first - see here for the latest on this. Also, the reason for the quickfail can be seen in the talk page history ;) rst20xx (talk) 19:26, 3 January...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accounting journals/archive1
Minggu, 2022-05-15 01:22:51

referring to something else? --Well-restedTalk 00:11, 25 January 2014 (UTC) Quickfail Oppose - just realized that you already have a nomination open; FLC is...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Did you know/Onepage
Kamis, 2024-02-08 07:52:07

reviewer. "Quickfail" reviews which result in an immediate failing of a nomination count as a QPQ. See Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Archive 204#Quickfails not...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Foot binding/archive1
Senin, 2024-12-16 11:03:47

In literature, film, and television section will merit this article a quickfail if it is nominated with it remaining. If there are entries that are not...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Recruitment Centre/Recruiter Central/Archives/Sasuke Sarutobi
Rabu, 2014-01-08 01:01:32

higher than is normal for GA, simply because I've been doing a lot of quickfails of unready nominations (orange cleanup banners at the top, obviously incomplete...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Burnt Norton/1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 10:51:06

GAN. I hadn't realised from that discussion the reviewer had applied a quickfail result. I thought the reviewer had commented awaiting feedback. Quickfailing...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/Mosque/archive1
Sabtu, 2022-03-26 07:57:35

Insufficient density of citations - numerous unreferenced paragraph - quickfail criteria for a new nomination. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Guitar Hero/archive1
Senin, 2023-02-20 04:33:14

2008 (UTC) IMO that type of thing could possibly be grounds for a simple quickfail. Similar to trying to nominate something at WP:GAC with loads of {{citeneeded}}...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Failed log/August 2008
Kamis, 2021-01-14 10:14:37

2008 (UTC) IMO that type of thing could possibly be grounds for a simple quickfail. Similar to trying to nominate something at WP:GAC with loads of {{citeneeded}}...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Failed log/April 2013
Sabtu, 2013-04-20 18:32:11

India's Satish Dhawan Space Centre - Jayadevp13 09:33, 7 April 2013 (UTC) Quickfail. The nomination is premature. The article has unformatted refs and an...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Snotbot 8
Kamis, 2023-02-09 18:02:25

to the specific revision that the bot checked) are at User:Snottywong/Quickfail AfC. Articles failed with a reason of "v" means they didn't have any references...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Wikipedia/1
Minggu, 2023-01-29 01:16:30

and unverifiable content, and that would probably be enough for me to quickfail this article if it was presented for a GA review now - wouldn't even bother...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:United States Education Program/Courses/JHU MolBio Ogg 2012/Section 81/Group 81B
Senin, 2017-08-07 11:59:27

Up (one of the Quickfails: Wikipedia:Good article criteria) Human telomeres, cancer and ALT requires Clean Up (one of the Quickfails: Wikipedia:Good...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Daredevil (Marvel Comics)/archive1
Selasa, 2009-08-18 17:00:23

over it. It was nominated for GA over two years ago, but I think the quickfail reasons cited at the time no longer apply. Any suggestions you can provide...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Anaptychia ciliaris/1
Senin, 2026-04-27 12:56:47

Otherwise anyone could slap a neutrality tag or a globalize tag on a GA and quickfail it because they felt like it. Again, unless you have actual, specific...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism/Collab
Senin, 2023-02-20 22:03:05

without bias: I dare say the level of non-neutral treatment borders on quickfail territory, but hopefully there will be some serious progress made on this...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/United States Academic Decathlon National Championship/archive1
Minggu, 2023-03-26 15:30:41

experiences at FAR, I have noticed that articles that would basically quickfail at FAC today often have a decent chance of staying an FA through FAR....

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good Article proposal drive 2023
Minggu, 2023-02-19 03:16:26

some of the reviewer's burden to a bot.) I.e., anything afoul of the quickfail criteria, notice of any open maintenance tags, Earwig %, recent edit warring...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Trump International Hotel and Tower (Chicago)/1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 10:57:19

either until I'm clearer about whether or not this really does fall under quickfail criteria - as Majoreditor says, has this come up for discussion before...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Lolicon/1
Sabtu, 2022-06-04 21:12:11

similar issues of depth of review with this reviewer before over their quickfail of Cyborg Kuro-chan. --Malkinann (talk) 22:15, 18 February 2011 (UTC)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Did you know/Guidelines
Rabu, 2026-06-03 09:50:31

the quality of each previous article. Reviewers are encouraged not to quickfail based on length; if an article is short but can be expanded 5x, the nominator...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Failed log/March 2011
Kamis, 2011-03-24 04:12:39

handy guide. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:30, 8 February 2011 (UTC) Oppose, quickfail please This is awful, sorry, and too far from the standards of FLC to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment
Jumat, 2026-05-15 04:36:37

Otherwise anyone could slap a neutrality tag or a globalize tag on a GA and quickfail it because they felt like it. Again, unless you have actual, specific...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Astronomy/2
Rabu, 2025-09-10 00:02:13

rather than WP:GAR, I would at this point have probably gone for a WP:QUICKFAIL on the grounds of serious WP:Text–source integrity issues. This article...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/log/May 2009
Selasa, 2009-06-02 23:28:16

experiences at FAR, I have noticed that articles that would basically quickfail at FAC today often have a decent chance of staying an FA through FAR....

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Did you know/Printable
Kamis, 2024-02-08 08:52:23

the quality of each previous article. Reviewers are encouraged not to quickfail based on length; if an article is short but can be expanded 5x, the nominator...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Ethiopian Airlines/1
Rabu, 2022-07-06 05:11:28

summarise the article plus there are a couple of cleanup tags present (quickfail 1 - I think). As to the points raised above by Janweh64 (talk · contribs)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Failed log/January 2014
Senin, 2014-01-27 08:05:55

referring to something else? --Well-restedTalk 00:11, 25 January 2014 (UTC) Quickfail Oppose - just realized that you already have a nomination open; FLC is...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/A Day in the Life/1
Senin, 2025-11-03 06:50:21

article alongside two unreliable source tags, which would result in a quickfail on its own if brought up to a modern GAN review. I do not believe this...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/November 2012/FE
Minggu, 2022-02-27 03:57:48

criteria that would eventually fix the need of drives by including two new quickfail criterias about prose quality and coverage issues. Community rejected...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/January 2022
Senin, 2025-12-15 11:51:20

(talk) 03:21, 4 April 2022 (UTC) Y Overruling in my capacity as GA coord. Quickfails are eligible to be counted so long as the review is still thorough enough...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 225
Jumat, 2025-12-26 22:45:16

that the sentence is not verifiable, they can quickfail it); however, this suggestion limits the quickfail potential for people who use AI, review its outputs...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Microsoft Security Essentials/archive2
Jumat, 2022-05-06 00:52:12

(talk) 12:29, 18 September 2012 (UTC) @Chris: Thanks. @Malleus: It is a GA quickfail (FA articles must meet GA criteria too). I had a couple of GA experiences...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Münchausen by Internet/1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 13:03:10

even close to quick-fail for GA. The writing in and of itself isn't even quickfail for FA, though in my mind it's a candidate for {{sofixit}}. Final word:...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive247
Jumat, 2024-08-16 05:12:13

to do with abrupt quickfailing is not (as it was an absurdly blatant quickfail abuse, "supported" by "ignore all rules" for the lack of any real arguments)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Place (Reddit)/1
Jumat, 2023-07-21 04:22:28

are encouraged to leave comments as if it was a GANR. If it would be a quickfail at GAN, they can suggest delisting. Otherwise, it is expected that one...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/March 2014
Kamis, 2024-01-04 06:04:58

weeks 2 points Under 2 weeks 1 point Quickfails* 0 points * No matter how old the nomination is, if you quickfail the article, it is worth 0 points. Article...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Ghost in the Shell (video game)/1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 10:52:31

avoided where possible I don't know that it really should have been a quickfail, but I didn't bother to look at the before link listed above. However...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive543
Selasa, 2024-09-03 05:17:25

of the sources [136]. When the review started, Jezhotwells decided to quickfail and claimed that the sites are blogs and therefore unreliable [137]. I...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive929
Kamis, 2023-03-09 23:36:54

archives are not being productively done. The last review was just a quickfail on the tagging. The tags have been removed. Is the tag removal at issue...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive928
Jumat, 2026-02-13 15:05:33

archives are not being productively done. The last review was just a quickfail on the tagging. The tags have been removed. Is the tag removal at issue...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive602
Jumat, 2025-04-25 00:55:31

(UTC) And there is disagreement with your assertion that it was a bad quickfail. It would have been better to discuss it first rather than doing what...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive816
Rabu, 2025-09-24 22:14:12

from me for pitching in with the backlog, but someone pointed out your quickfail at Pitfour estate with no examples or actionable recommendations, and...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1043
Minggu, 2023-02-05 03:58:47

the article is up for GA review again; I would personally be tempted to quickfail it for failing point 5. "Stability", but that probably wouldn't be constructive...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1006
Sabtu, 2023-03-04 00:49:46

original concern is a valid talk page consideration (that is it doesn't quickfail NOT#FORUM), so just removing the DS link because its the DS while leaving...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/November 2012
Senin, 2023-05-22 00:55:50

criteria that would eventually fix the need of drives by including two new quickfail criterias about prose quality and coverage issues. Community rejected...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1067
Senin, 2026-04-06 22:30:39

reviews. Some of these reviews were brought up on WT:GAN as inappropriate quickfails. A wide variety of experienced GA writers and reviewers brought up that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Did you know/Good Article RfC
Sabtu, 2026-04-25 07:33:45

criteria are required as part of the review process. It used to be a quickfail criteria, but because copyright violations are predominatley found during...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/February 2013
Senin, 2023-05-22 00:55:42

currently being held. A requets for comment proposing a new wording for the quickfail criteria, proposed by Aircorn, is currently being held. There are currently...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/September 2019
Senin, 2025-12-15 12:05:14

Torobayev Russian interference in the 2016 United States electionsN while a quickfail not a detailed review for these purposes Barkeep49 (talk) Modern Tales...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 144
Minggu, 2024-10-20 06:45:44

patrolling the mouth end of the AFC queue so actively (go over the front for quickfail objections (Copyright, attacks, patent nonsense)), and work the tail end...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors/Archives/Did you know/2026
Senin, 2026-04-13 04:06:57

place on the nompage, if someone wants, but if it were up to me I would quickfail this. This article wasn't written by the nominator and I have no idea...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/June-July 2012
Kamis, 2024-01-04 06:04:57

— Wizardman "Talk That Talk (Rihanna song)" — Wizardman "Cat Daddy" N Quickfail. —Hahc21 03:20, 2 August 2012 (UTC) Tropical Depression Nine (2001) —Pyrotec...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article review/Archive 23
Sabtu, 2026-01-24 00:46:16

no basis for the claim that there are image tag problems (which led to quickfail), especially as of now since all the images in the article are in Wikipedia...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Arab migrations to the Maghreb/1
Senin, 2024-09-02 18:53:07

11:48, 2 September 2024 (UTC) I agree, and as a copyright violation is a quickfail criterion, I have delisted the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:53...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Golden Eagle Award for Best Foreign Language Film/archive1
Sabtu, 2021-12-25 15:19:12

handy guide. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:30, 8 February 2011 (UTC) Oppose, quickfail please This is awful, sorry, and too far from the standards of FLC to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Recruitment Centre/Recruiter Central/Archives/Jburlinson
Kamis, 2013-11-14 20:03:00

to seek help at WP:GOCE or some related Wikiproject; or you can simply quickfail it if you find the problems are persistent and would take extensive work...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Combat: Woman Pleading for the Vanquished/archive1
Selasa, 2025-09-23 19:54:54

using standard citation templates without an excellent reason" would be a quickfail criterion). In the case of the Burnage references at least, it doesn't...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 March 7
Jumat, 2026-01-23 20:12:15

as to not make people too bitter from pointless wasting (idealy, the quickfail happens within 15 minutes of someone noticing it on their watchlist)....

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Freedom from Want (painting)/1
Minggu, 2023-01-29 01:16:48

a proper review (where I interpret proper review to mean opposite of quickfail).--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:40, 8 February...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Recruitment Centre/Recruiter Central/Archives/User:BrandonWu
Jumat, 2022-02-18 08:42:33

memorizer and to make sure that I hit everything I need to. I don't tend to quickfail articles; I've never seen one in such bad shape at GAC. I've found that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Recruitment Centre/Recruiter Central/Archives/BuzyBody
Sabtu, 2013-07-27 10:57:34

memorizer and to make sure that I hit everything I need to. I don't tend to quickfail articles; I've never seen one in such bad shape at GAC. I've found that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article help/Archive 2
Rabu, 2026-03-11 06:43:57

which is simply not a quickfail criterion. Finally, if you yourself are adding the templates, then it is also not a quickfail criterion: this refers...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/June 2026
Minggu, 2026-06-07 16:18:53

experienced reviewer. Please do not close your review (i.e., pass, fail, or quickfail it) before an experienced reviewer has had a chance to check it. If you...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Bilorv's Challenges
Rabu, 2026-06-03 10:36:19

food, and drink" to "Warfare". That is, "Miscellaneous" is not required. Quickfails count; Wikipedia:Good article reassessment does not. It doesn't have to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Recruitment Centre/Recruiter Central/Archives/Biggs Pliff
Selasa, 2026-04-07 03:44:45

memorizer and to make sure that I hit everything I need to. I don't tend to quickfail articles; I've never seen one in such bad shape at GAC. I've found that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Spot checking sources
Jumat, 2026-02-27 16:46:48

minimize frustration due to wasted effort: Start with a check against the quickfail criteria (WP:QF). Check if there might be an earlier GAN review with unaddressed...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)/Archive 13
Minggu, 2023-10-15 20:05:21

navigating that information has no business in the admin role. Many of the quickfail/SNOW RfAs include users that didn't bother adhering to that guidance....

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Recruitment Centre/Recruiter Central/Archives/Ammodramus
Sabtu, 2020-07-11 10:33:32

reviews would be, because it was trending toward failing without being a quickfail at first glance. (After reading your comments and looking myself, I agree...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 34
Kamis, 2020-06-04 20:45:10

was a quickfail that was quickfailed because there was a legitimate clean up tag in the article. Which is still there as of this comment. Quickfails (legitimate...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Millennium Park/archive3
Senin, 2025-01-20 13:44:32

not beat the clock with this and one more promotion. FAC2 was a recent quickfail due to image issues which have been resolved at Wikipedia:Peer review/Millennium...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Urusei Yatsura/archive1
Kamis, 2025-07-03 11:06:44

GAN. :) I'm a little surprised that excessive fair use images aren't a quickfail, but that's probably because GA is not just for fiction articles. ;) --Malkinann...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Recruitment Centre/Recruiter Central/Archives/Jcc
Kamis, 2014-05-08 06:25:05

memorizer and to make sure that I hit everything I need to. I don't tend to quickfail articles; I've never seen one in such bad shape at GAC. I've found that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Recruitment Centre/Recruiter Central/Archives/ТимофейЛееСуда
Sabtu, 2023-01-28 22:21:45

memorizer and to make sure that I hit everything I need to. I don't tend to quickfail articles; I've never seen one in such bad shape at GAC. I've found that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GAN backlog elimination drives/June-July 2012/Totals
Minggu, 2023-08-27 12:25:53

— Wizardman "Talk That Talk (Rihanna song)" — Wizardman "Cat Daddy" N Quickfail. —Hahc21 03:20, 2 August 2012 (UTC) Tropical Depression Nine (2001) —Pyrotec...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/June 2013
Rabu, 2013-07-31 04:56:28

--Rschen7754 19:41, 2 June 2013 (UTC) *Delist and as Rschen says, would quickfail a GA review due to the honking great {{refimprove}} at the top of the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/December 2013
Rabu, 2014-01-08 02:45:27

Insufficient density of citations - numerous unreferenced paragraph - quickfail criteria for a new nomination. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance/archive64
Selasa, 2024-09-03 05:22:13

of the sources [80]. When the review started, Jezhotwells decided to quickfail and claimed that the sites are blogs and therefore unreliable [81]. I...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Looie496
Sabtu, 2026-02-21 12:01:34

who starts off their RfA stating areas that they wont work in. That's a quickfail for me. --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 05:01, 6 October 2010 (UTC) I'd like...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article review/Archive 16
Minggu, 2025-09-14 23:20:57

sign of the anon, so I've removed the template, but, really, is this "GA quickfail" template even a good idea? It gives no suggestions for moving on. Adam...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/February 2013/PN
Jumat, 2025-08-15 23:50:52

wording for the quickfail criteria, proposed by Aircorn, is currently being held. Aircorn proposed a change that basically leaved the "quickfail" word out of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 36
Selasa, 2024-11-26 05:18:12

are not reliable sources. If editors are unhappy with the decision to quickfail then take it to WP:GAR. There are undoubtedly plenty of reliable sources...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 49
Kamis, 2020-06-04 20:52:59

Completely and unequivocally improper quickfail. Courcelles 03:57, 5 October 2010 (UTC) Overturn and relist. Quickfail was improper; needs a full review....

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Education noticeboard/Archive 6
Rabu, 2023-12-13 11:48:46

think the idea is nice in theory, but in practice, too many are straight quickfails, with maintenance banners and sometimes more than ten unsourced paragraphs...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 45
Kamis, 2020-06-04 20:51:19

GAN. I hadn't realised from that discussion the reviewer had applied a quickfail result. I thought the reviewer had commented awaiting feedback. Quickfailing...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Education noticeboard/Archive 2
Jumat, 2025-11-28 14:38:36

them. Likewise I can't see blocking an entire class. I would encourage quickfails at GAN and DYK, and have quickfailed some edu DYK's myself in the past...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Candidates/NoobThreePointOh
Minggu, 2025-07-13 03:22:52

clearly engaged with the article, though no spotchecks were done, and the quickfail was based on appropriate criteria. One nomination at FAC, quickly archived...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/15.ai/1
Senin, 2024-11-18 21:27:29

reviewer. Liz Read! Talk! 05:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC) Delist - this is a quickfail #4 and fails general criterion #5 (stable) both owing to the constant...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Candidates/Sahaib
Sabtu, 2025-08-09 11:42:18

to my question shows that Sahaib still has some areas to grow in. The quickfail was not appropriate, for the editor claimed that the article didn't have...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GAN backlog elimination drives/June-July 2012/Main
Senin, 2023-03-27 07:38:43

— Wizardman "Talk That Talk (Rihanna song)" — Wizardman "Cat Daddy" N Quickfail. —Hahc21 03:20, 2 August 2012 (UTC) Tropical Depression Nine (2001) —Pyrotec...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Abbasid invasion of Asia Minor (806)/archive1
Rabu, 2020-01-15 07:05:49

it as a basis for improving the article here and now? Do you suggest a quickfail based on prose and/or length? And your critique thus far does not touch...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:United States Education Program/Courses/JHU MolBio Ogg 2013/Group 81H
Selasa, 2023-11-28 17:07:10

in Talk page by one author! Illustrated (With images or graphics) Some Quickfails Notes: I think we could get this article to B relatively easily! A relating...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 35
Kamis, 2020-06-04 20:47:08

February 2008 (UTC) Relist for now The delisting was initially based on a quickfail edit conflict, but those criteria do not apply to the article. While it...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Recruitment Centre/Recruiter Central/Archives/Shoebox2
Selasa, 2026-04-07 03:45:43

memorizer and to make sure that I hit everything I need to. I don't tend to quickfail articles; I've never seen one in such bad shape at GAC. I've found that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 37
Kamis, 2020-06-04 20:47:29

either until I'm clearer about whether or not this really does fall under quickfail criteria - as Majoreditor says, has this come up for discussion before...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Frozen (2013 film)/archive1
Sabtu, 2023-11-11 07:05:43

this article as a WP:Good article nomination, I would close it as a WP:QUICKFAIL. I suggest this nomination be archived so the article can be brought to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 59
Kamis, 2020-06-04 20:56:56

a proper review (where I interpret proper review to mean opposite of quickfail).--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:40, 8 February...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article help/Archive 1
Sabtu, 2023-07-29 21:38:32

with no other contribution history - I judge this as C class at best. Quickfail. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:55, 3 December 2011 (UTC)" The problem with that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 42
Kamis, 2020-06-04 20:50:04

links, lead issues, notability, and too much detail. None of which are quickfail criteria, None of which are even a reason to fail an article in the first...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates/May 2011
Selasa, 2011-05-31 11:12:37

samples. I am aware that ragtime is not orchestral, but this nom may be a quickfail anyways since the band has no piano, which may be essential to ragtime...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 52
Kamis, 2020-06-04 20:53:24

decision to quickfail the initial GAN. The reviewer cited the article's lack of references in the lead and plot section as reasons for the quickfail, but per...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/January 2025
Senin, 2025-12-15 12:00:57

wordcount to the nearest 500, for the sake of the co-ordinators' sanity. For quickfails and insubstantial reviews, only the review point might be rewarded (at...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ice Warrior/archive1
Senin, 2025-11-03 07:06:00

issues that were far more than just simple fixes; it was a justifiable quickfail because I would've had to completely rewrite and alter multiple sections...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 43
Kamis, 2020-06-04 20:51:02

see why this article should not have them, hence i support the original quickfail. I didn't see the original reviewer asking for multiple cites for each...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/September 2012
Sabtu, 2012-12-01 12:12:53

(talk) 12:29, 18 September 2012 (UTC) @Chris: Thanks. @Malleus: It is a GA quickfail (FA articles must meet GA criteria too). I had a couple of GA experiences...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive305
Kamis, 2020-05-28 10:13:45

this viewpoint is due. I do agree that the proposed expanded version quickfails and I have reverted per BLP. VQuakr (talk) 21:26, 7 May 2020 (UTC) I think...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 58
Kamis, 2020-06-04 20:56:44

avoided where possible I don't know that it really should have been a quickfail, but I didn't bother to look at the before link listed above. However...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Closure requests/Archive 6
Selasa, 2024-12-24 08:25:18

2013 entries Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Caste/Archive 4#RfC: Does the article minimize the centrality of India to the notion...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Recruitment Centre/Recruiter Central/Archives/Seabuckthorn
Senin, 2020-11-30 10:40:32

identified. A "quickfail" is when you simply fail the article right away. These are relatively rare. There are only three valid reason to quickfail an article...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/May 2025
Senin, 2025-12-15 12:04:44

experienced reviewer. Please do not close your review (i.e., pass, fail, or quickfail it) before an experienced reviewer has had a chance to check it. If you...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Florida State University/1
Selasa, 2024-07-30 05:05:12

10:18, 30 June 2024 (UTC) Copyright violations in articles are a GAN quickfail criterion, Sirberus. You will note that WP:COPYRIGHT, a policy with legal...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/August 2010
Selasa, 2010-08-31 22:14:33

not beat the clock with this and one more promotion. FAC2 was a recent quickfail due to image issues which have been resolved at Wikipedia:Peer review/Millennium...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 60
Kamis, 2020-06-18 07:15:10

--The1337gamer (talk) 11:55, 8 August 2015 (UTC) Delist Article arguably meets the quickfail criteria. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 14:22, 10 August 2015 (UTC) Delist...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 50
Kamis, 2020-06-04 20:53:06

similar issues of depth of review with this reviewer before over their quickfail of Cyborg Kuro-chan. --Malkinann (talk) 22:15, 18 February 2011 (UTC)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 56
Kamis, 2020-06-04 20:55:34

summarise the article plus there are a couple of cleanup tags present (quickfail 1 - I think). As to the points raised above by Janweh64 (talk · contribs)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 46
Kamis, 2020-06-04 20:51:25

checkmark. Tell the authors what. Nothing in this process- other than a quickfail- can be done in under half an hour.Bradjamesbrown (talk) 22:55, 2 January...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Discussion-only period/Archive 2
Jumat, 2024-09-27 17:04:26

toxic, if at all - for my part I found it roughly as hurtful as any other quickfail. The problem isn't with the formalism, the problem is the way in which...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/July 2024
Senin, 2025-12-15 11:58:39

experienced reviewer. Please do not close your review (ie, pass, fail, or quickfail it) before an experienced reviewer has had a chance to check it. if you...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 66
Sabtu, 2022-04-09 09:58:33

this is a pretty weak article to have the badge -- I'd be inclined to quickfail it were I the reviewer, or at least go for a very "we're going to do significant...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/August 2015
Sabtu, 2015-08-29 19:19:02

using standard citation templates without an excellent reason" would be a quickfail criterion). In the case of the Burnage references at least, it doesn't...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good Article proposal drive 2023/Feedback
Senin, 2023-02-27 10:55:21

January 2023 (UTC) Okay, I thought you meant actually create the page and quickfail it. I don't expect to be removing any more templates in the near future...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/2015/Failed
Sabtu, 2016-01-02 19:38:59

- @WP:MILHIST coordinators: this looks to me to be a candidate for a quickfail. There is a huge amount of high quality academic material on this subject...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/January 2020
Kamis, 2020-01-30 22:27:58

it as a basis for improving the article here and now? Do you suggest a quickfail based on prose and/or length? And your critique thus far does not touch...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 79
Selasa, 2024-10-08 21:38:49

11:48, 2 September 2024 (UTC) I agree, and as a copyright violation is a quickfail criterion, I have delisted the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:53...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 61
Kamis, 2020-06-18 07:20:23

throughout the article against unsourced content. That would probably be a quickfail if I GA reviewed it today. I'm not sure how to fix it all - can anyone...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Magic: The Gathering/archive2
Selasa, 2026-04-07 07:12:58

Section Criteria status Excerpt Suggestion 1 Gameplay 2nd paragraph   quickfail Cards fall into two classes: lands and spells. Citation needed tag, preferably...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 63
Kamis, 2020-06-18 07:27:34

citations are needed. If this was nominated for GAN in its current state, I'd quickfail it. Freikorp (talk) 08:44, 25 March 2018 (UTC) Thanks for getting involved...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GA Cup/Newsletter/January 2015
Sabtu, 2021-01-02 21:06:23

how to improve the GA Cup in the future, including the definition of "quickfails" and the use of pools, which we'll seriously consider as we move forward...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/February 2026
Sabtu, 2026-05-02 14:59:19

wordcount to the nearest 500, for the sake of the co-ordinators' sanity. For quickfails and insubstantial reviews, only the review point might be rewarded (at...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/October 2025
Rabu, 2026-01-28 22:52:59

have reviewed all of your listed GAN articles at the end of drive. For quickfails and insubstantial reviews, only the review point might be rewarded (at...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bit.bio
Minggu, 2024-10-27 12:03:06

WP:TRADES likely paraphrasing a presser to me No idea how reliable Skipped, quickfail on other criteria Regalado, Antonio. "Here's why I am coining the term...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1153
Kamis, 2024-06-13 10:50:11

WP:GAN: TTT has nominated (and sometimes renominated directly after a quickfail) several articles that he last edited years ago, and some of them are...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/May 2009
Kamis, 2016-02-11 10:05:30

I saw up at WP:GAN; I suggest you remove it from the queue to avoid a quickfail: article should be renamed to Gobioides broussonneti (specific epithet...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 October 20
Senin, 2024-10-28 16:19:50

WP:TRADES likely paraphrasing a presser to me No idea how reliable Skipped, quickfail on other criteria Regalado, Antonio. "Here's why I am coining the term...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/May 2013
Sabtu, 2013-06-01 19:46:48

of other featured articles. Mechonis (talk) 17:48, 27 April 2013 (UTC) quickfail Setting up this FAC is the editor's first and only edits here. Several...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Change (company) (2nd nomination)
Jumat, 2025-11-14 15:27:14

round". FinTech Global. Retrieved 2023-10-11. – No evidence it is, but quickfail funding announcement minimal additional detail anyway Tucker, Charlotte...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 1
Senin, 2024-06-10 12:47:55

2024-05-17. Seems like a media release again, but again, moot by the RS quickfail First thing I notice here was the about page linking to D2 Emerge... We...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SurrealDB
Senin, 2025-12-22 10:11:11

2024-05-17. Seems like a media release again, but again, moot by the RS quickfail First thing I notice here was the about page linking to D2 Emerge... We...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/November 2010
Selasa, 2010-11-30 07:40:24

to assess readiness. --Andy Walsh (talk) 16:41, 1 November 2010 (UTC) Quickfail, please, before pile-on: Wikipedia:Peer review/Ulnar collateral ligament...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article mentorship/Archive 1
Rabu, 2026-06-03 04:56:39

19:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC) Leafy46, I personally fully concur with that quickfail. I think you did an excellent job of pointing out what needs to be improved...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/March 2024
Senin, 2025-12-15 11:57:24

and the close of the review, discuss the situation with coordinators. Quickfails are capped at one point and will not receive additional points for length...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 27
Senin, 2026-03-09 05:30:44

labeled run-of-the-ordinary Wikipedia articles by considering several "quickfails" that can eliminate a nominated article from promotion to a good article...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 72
Selasa, 2023-09-19 16:43:15

criteria one. Regardless, were I reviewing this article for GA I would quickfail due to only one source. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:04, 27 June 2023...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 November 7
Sabtu, 2025-11-15 10:16:15

round". FinTech Global. Retrieved 2023-10-11. – No evidence it is, but quickfail funding announcement minimal additional detail anyway Tucker, Charlotte...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 81
Jumat, 2024-12-20 02:17:29

reviewer. Liz Read! Talk! 05:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC) Delist - this is a quickfail #4 and fails general criterion #5 (stable) both owing to the constant...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 89
Sabtu, 2025-11-22 11:24:57

article alongside two unreliable source tags, which would result in a quickfail on its own if brought up to a modern GAN review. I do not believe this...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/February 2010
Rabu, 2010-03-31 06:45:33

GAN. :) I'm a little surprised that excessive fair use images aren't a quickfail, but that's probably because GA is not just for fiction articles. ;) --Malkinann...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/August 2009
Kamis, 2016-02-11 09:18:07

over it. It was nominated for GA over two years ago, but I think the quickfail reasons cited at the time no longer apply. Any suggestions you can provide...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 68
Rabu, 2023-02-08 17:21:27

found Result: Significant citation issues mean that the article meets the quickfail criteria, and thus should be delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:35...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 September 21
Minggu, 2024-09-29 06:02:52

tagged {{Notability}} by Lettler (courtesy ping), which would make it a quickfail at GAN. Of course, I wouldn't have created the article if I didn't think...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1251
Kamis, 2025-11-13 06:07:04

merit behind it, but they pushed this narrative and forced Freedoxm to quickfail the nomination before the nomination even got to finish. Then that brings...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 71
Minggu, 2023-07-02 05:49:53

Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review Result: Close to quickfail level. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:14, 26 June 2023 (UTC) GA from...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 90
Selasa, 2025-12-16 08:42:47

fail per WP:GAFAIL? cookiemonster755 (talk) 15:35, 27 October 2025 (UTC) Quickfails are explicitly for GANs, not GARs. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:29...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 78
Rabu, 2024-08-28 19:43:54

10:18, 30 June 2024 (UTC) Copyright violations in articles are a GAN quickfail criterion, Sirberus. You will note that WP:COPYRIGHT, a policy with legal...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 88
Sabtu, 2025-10-04 22:59:27

rather than WP:GAR, I would at this point have probably gone for a WP:QUICKFAIL on the grounds of serious WP:Text–source integrity issues. This article...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive365
Minggu, 2026-03-01 08:50:25

February 2026 (UTC) TarnishedPath The only incident you cite is the GA quickfail. If you want to present misbehaviour in the topic area I'd expect something...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1128
Sabtu, 2023-07-22 15:37:45

very rudimentary contents barely covering material being useful. Both quickfails concluded with this statement, which I don't even need to explain the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Pppery
Jumat, 2023-10-20 21:42:27

considering Lee found Magic: The Gathering rules of such low quality as to quickfail, but not sufficient to move me to an oppose on its own. However, the poor...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/November 2025
Kamis, 2025-11-27 20:15:14

issues that were far more than just simple fixes; it was a justifiable quickfail because I would've had to completely rewrite and alter multiple sections...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 77
Selasa, 2024-07-02 04:31:02

10:18, 30 June 2024 (UTC) Copyright violations in articles are a GAN quickfail criterion, Sirberus. You will note that WP:COPYRIGHT, a policy with legal...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 83
Minggu, 2025-03-16 01:05:10

you meant to nominate at GAN, but I would suggest against it. This is a quickfail due to large chunks of uncited text. CMD (talk) 00:39, 14 February 2025...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1223
Jumat, 2026-01-23 07:16:55

on the article talk page to that effect, so that your reviewer doesn't quickfail it. -- asilvering (talk) 22:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Thank you, I'll do...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/November 2023
Kamis, 2023-11-30 23:25:37

this article as a WP:Good article nomination, I would close it as a WP:QUICKFAIL. I suggest this nomination be archived so the article can be brought to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Discussion phase
Senin, 2026-04-20 04:38:29

clearly engaged with the article, though no spotchecks were done, and the quickfail was based on appropriate criteria. One nomination at FAC, quickly archived...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive377
Kamis, 2026-03-05 14:12:18

at 22:17 UTC on January 1st, about two days after they posted their quickfail verdict for the review. The renumbering appears to be entirely correct...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1205
Sabtu, 2026-03-07 21:09:49

consider whether they have adequate knowledge to opine about what the quickfail criteria should be. Now, RGloucester has opened a clearly retaliatory...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1187
Jumat, 2025-07-18 06:42:27

standards (statements that would not meet the standard of review even of many quickfails of GA nominations; example) and, in effect, asks any would-be rescuer...

Click to read more »