Search Results: Wikipedia:PRSOURCE


Wikipedia:Independent sources
Rabu, 2026-04-15 20:31:10

details or to provide the subject's viewpoint. Shortcut WP:PRSOURCEWP:PRSOURCE A press release is clearly not an independent source as it is usually written...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaun Carroll
Minggu, 2024-11-10 18:25:55

MolecularPilot 09:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC) Adding that the "news" article is a WP:PRSOURCE and can't prove notability. also this "award" (if you can call it that)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EV Group (2nd nomination)
Kamis, 2025-01-16 17:43:28

press releases, and other non-independent sources ([7], [8], [9]); WP:PRSOURCE-driven coverage in WP:TRADES publications ([10], [11], [12]); and a WP:PRIMARYSOURCE...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandie Knight
Selasa, 2025-12-16 02:38:27

references belong to blogs and recondite trade publications or fall under WP:PRSOURCE, and the claims of working on various Hollywood projects are totally unsourced...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zil Money
Jumat, 2025-12-19 11:50:34

America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:13, 14 December 2023 (UTC) Delete. Per WP:PRSOURCE nearly all the sources on the page are non-significant, so this fails WP:NCORP...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miranda Hennessy
Minggu, 2024-11-17 22:04:38

her [3] and a press release which can't count towards notability per WP:PRSOURCE [4]. She also doesn't meet the more specific WP:NACTOR either, which requires...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakai Hati Reborn
Kamis, 2026-02-12 20:54:36

multiple outlets publishing similar article within a narrow timeframe. Per WP:PRSOURCE, such source is not independent, also indicates one-off publicity rather...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulent Tekmen
Selasa, 2024-11-05 23:42:53

mix of WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS or affiliated/non-independent sources like WP:PRSOURCE and official bios. Nothing else useful found in WP:BEFORE search. Dclemens1971...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Langit untuk Renata
Senin, 2026-02-23 07:56:13

multiple outlets publishing similar article within a narrow timeframe. Per WP:PRSOURCE, such source is not independent, also indicates one-off publicity rather...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texephyr (2nd nomination)
Jumat, 2025-12-19 10:27:10

are not WP:RS and this one is reliable (though it might fall under WP:PRSOURCE, I am not sure yet). 1 RS is still not enough, though admittedly I did...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Games Finder
Jumat, 2025-12-12 07:19:06

Reuters Press Release mentioned above generally do not qualify (see WP:PRSOURCE). Further, I am not aware that the notability criteria is satisfied by...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Martyr Helmet Dêraluk
Sabtu, 2024-11-02 10:53:36

statement cannot be reliable or considered to be from a WP:NPOV. Per WP:PRSOURCE "Press releases cannot be used to support claims of notability and should...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ipar adalah Maut the Series
Senin, 2026-03-02 07:44:01

multiple outlets publishing similar article within a narrow timeframe. Per WP:PRSOURCE, such source is not independent, also indicates one-off publicity rather...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martifer
Selasa, 2025-12-09 12:08:53

are obviously some sources just based on company press release (see WP:PRSOURCE. There is nothing that could be called independent. Farooqahmadbhat (talk)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shopaccino
Minggu, 2025-12-14 09:11:38

is a PR news release.. Joojay (talk) 16:13, 26 August 2021 (UTC) See WP:PRSOURCE. The TechRadar source is not significant coverage, per WP:CORPDEPTH. The...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 April 15
Senin, 2022-04-25 14:35:44

posting a message here, unfortunately, it does not appear to be a good source, see WP:PRSOURCE and its about us page Justiyaya 16:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salman Ahmed Al-Ansari (2nd nomination)
Jumat, 2025-12-19 09:16:09

press releases, which aren't indicative of notability according to WP:PRSOURCE, so I agree. Aamri2 (talk) 21:29, 8 August 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RuPaul's DragCon UK
Senin, 2022-01-31 11:32:21

is totally not congruent with what is in the article. Additionally, WP:PRSOURCE says we can not use press releases as sources, which means you cannot use...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ascent South End
Selasa, 2025-12-16 01:59:44

Newswire is not a newspaper, it is a distributor of press releases and per WP:PRSOURCE what you get from it does not count towards notability. The Multifamilybiz...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AccessPay
Minggu, 2024-09-29 06:05:37

(talk) 21:55, 24 September 2024 (UTC) Delete. Sources are WP:ORGTRIV, WP:PRSOURCE, WP:TRADES or some combination thereof. Fails WP:NCORP and very close to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Silvestri
Senin, 2025-12-22 07:54:26

the opening act. Regarding the other two articles, what makes them WP:PRSOURCE ("promos") or on what basis are "people to watch" type articles excluded...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Staminier
Jumat, 2025-12-12 17:09:38

company that are reprinted elsewhere are not independent sources. See WP:PRSOURCE. --MarioGom (talk) 00:50, 10 March 2020 (UTC) MarioGom: your right, but...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Europeana
Jumat, 2025-12-12 06:41:21

GNG terms - if that were so where on earth would that lead? Well, see WP:PRSOURCE. Regardless, I did miss the actualitte/mymodernmet sources which are plainly...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Message Exchange Bus (MXB)
Minggu, 2025-02-23 15:00:44

Comment: Two of the ITO sources are press releases and therefore fail WP:PRSOURCE, while the "Digital Platforms and Services" page only contains a single...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethernet Exchange
Senin, 2025-12-22 05:01:16

coverage such as press releases [...] is not significant coverage", WP:PRSOURCE "A press release is clearly not an independent source"), so bringing it...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Ardennes
Senin, 2024-11-11 00:41:47

Talk! 08:49, 8 November 2024 (UTC) Delete as current references are WP:PRSOURCEs either from the US or Iraq governments and "cannot be used towards claims...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akshat Tyagi
Kamis, 2025-12-18 23:41:33

JSTOR · TWL) Article created by a UPE/COI editor, consisting largely of WP:PRSOURCEs. I cannot find reliable, independent coverage of the subject and his company...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HiveColab
Senin, 2025-01-20 15:43:11

09:55, 4 January 2025 (UTC) FYI, I have updated the above analysis. See WP:PRSOURCE. A press release doesn’t need to directly come from Hive Colab. It can...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathalie Beasnael (2nd nomination)
Kamis, 2025-01-02 08:28:40

thus WP:PRIMARYSOURCEs ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]) WP:PRSOURCEs ([10], [11]) Churnalism based on interviews solely with or statements...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rolf W. Schnyder
Minggu, 2025-12-14 08:17:41

press release, or press announcement on about the same date, and per WP:PRSOURCE "Press releases and articles written from press releases cannot be used...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of best-selling visual novels
Rabu, 2026-05-13 08:31:53

limited number of WP:PRSOURCEs. In an article about an individual visual novel, we can disclose this potential bias in a PRSOURCE implicitly by stating...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hell University
Jumat, 2026-02-06 11:50:20

used for the first time on the succeeding edits. As keeping with the WP:PRSOURCE, the supposedly WP:RS is entitled "Here's What Fans Are Saying". Howard...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nima Asgari
Rabu, 2024-10-09 21:14:29

not WP:SIGCOV. As for WP:NFILMMAKER, I saw news coverage (but more WP:PRSOURCEs of some film festival category wins, but no reviews of his work in independent...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tormach
Kamis, 2024-10-17 09:30:46

fails WP:NCORP. All the coverage available consists of press releases (WP:PRSOURCE), niche WP:TRADES publications not contributing to notability, and WP:ORGTRIV...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cryptonews
Sabtu, 2025-12-13 22:28:04

Finance page is a press release, which are classed as non-independent at WP:PRSOURCE. I have also consulted the article you mentioned. (Here's a link if other...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of countries with Starlink availability
Kamis, 2026-04-23 10:39:49

seems like conflict of interest and rather WP:SELF primary source and WP:PRSOURCE. The tweets amount to their company's own press releases. The burden to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Drysdale
Kamis, 2024-12-12 01:10:58

N A press release posted by Drysdale's company on BusinessWire. Per WP:PRSOURCE, A press release is clearly not an independent source as it is usually...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Japan/Reliable sources
Sabtu, 2026-05-30 21:55:34

See WP:SHUKANBUNSHUN Shortcut WP:JAPANPRWP:JAPANPR Per WP:PRSOURCE, A press release is clearly not an independent source as it is usually...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockoons
Senin, 2025-12-22 09:22:17

independent. At the top it says "Пресс-релизы," or press release See WP:PRSOURCE. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:07, 8 June 2024 (UTC) Is this one a press release...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiduciam
Selasa, 2025-06-10 21:24:07

run of the mill information, probably based on a press release. See WP:PRSOURCE. Autocar might work as one source, but it only has two sentences about...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Singapore Rail Test Centre/1
Jumat, 2025-07-11 18:47:14

articles but it can be used cautiously for other assertions per Wikipedia:PRSOURCE, such as uncontroversial fact. And as mentioned above, ST is independent...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dario Item
Rabu, 2025-06-25 01:03:32

Dario Item's role as Ambassador of Antigua and Barbuda. NO evidence of WP:PRSOURCE as User:Arcaist claims. O'Murchu, Cynthia; Smith, Robert; Ashworth, Louis;...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Treyten Lapcevich
Selasa, 2025-12-16 12:55:15

in race series. The general concern outlined for press releases at WP:PRSOURCE seems to be focused on how press releases can include undue praise. Also...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimeshan Naidoo
Selasa, 2024-09-24 08:35:20

independent, reliable sources. They are limited to WP:INTERVIEWS, WP:PRSOURCEs, and WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS. His awards are the kind of "30 under 30" cruft...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 February 9
Minggu, 2020-10-25 07:58:17

releases are never reliable sources because they are not independent, see WP:PRSOURCE. Anyone can issue a press release. shoy (reactions) 19:33, 13 February...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bias Capital
Selasa, 2024-12-24 10:43:05

Arguably the Business Wire source is a press release and would fall under WP:PRSOURCE. Brandon (talk) 16:37, 17 December 2024 (UTC) I'm now officially confused...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carley Shimkus
Sabtu, 2025-12-13 21:38:55

20:36, 30 October 2021 (UTC) @Sucker for All, please read WP:PRSOURCE. You are literally arguing with people who have tens of thousands of edits...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bethany Christian Schools
Selasa, 2025-12-16 02:25:03

which means they are not independent and can't establish notability (WP:PRSOURCE). Coverage of a student's murder does not lend notability to the school...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zameen.com (2nd nomination)
Jumat, 2025-12-19 11:48:46

maybe), but maybe somewhat less so and at least it's independent and not PRSOURCE. Given the coverage and article both focus on it as a business entity and...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ondo State Youth Network
Jumat, 2024-11-22 07:22:25

should be but when I said, press release, I am referring to this guide: WP:PRSOURCE. As you have shown above, the sources that validates the existence of this...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chimele Usuwa Abengowe
Rabu, 2024-10-02 01:06:33

(talk) 12:14, 27 September 2024 (UTC) Cfaso2000, about source 7, see WP:PRSOURCE. Best, Reading Beans 08:38, 30 September 2024 (UTC) The above discussion...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Cooley
Selasa, 2025-05-06 21:09:37

noted above, this is a near-verbatim reprint of a press release, see WP:PRSOURCE, from Cooley's company and thus not independent. Irish Times: an obituary...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qlone
Jumat, 2025-12-19 08:34:30

not possible to write a non-PROMO encyclopedia article exclusively from PRSOURCEs. With respect to Timothytyy, CastJared and our IP contributor here, I...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Johnson (labor leader)
Senin, 2025-12-22 06:13:05

release with a little added text. For our purposes, it's a republished WP:PRSOURCE. The Seattle Times's first reference has Johnson mentioned twice for an...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revolutionary Communist Party (UK, 2024) (2nd nomination)
Kamis, 2025-05-29 07:49:25

does apply here with regards to a government press release (see also WP:PRSOURCE). ABOUTSELF applies to each source individually, so a PR statement by the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moonmana
Minggu, 2024-11-03 08:34:30

reference is basically a press release, and also isn't evidence per WP:PRSOURCE. I feel like there's not really anything left that indicates notability...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juhor ad-Dik ambush
Jumat, 2025-12-19 05:01:12

agency "AA" source only quotes a Hamas press release verbatim, see WP:PRSOURCE - "Press releases cannot be used to support claims of notability". Marokwitz...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangladesh Popular Party
Selasa, 2025-05-06 11:54:05

presumed significant coverage and must be independent of the subject. WP:PRSOURCE clearly states that "A press release is clearly not an independent source...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Owiredu
Selasa, 2025-01-07 14:06:49

and WP:SIGCOV. None of the sources you assessed as press releases are WP:PRSOURCE and all provide significant coverage of the subject. - Robertjamal12 ~🔔...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Safal Committee
Selasa, 2025-09-30 21:36:50

was in the tweets, they are not independent secondary sources. See WP:PRSOURCE. — Usedtobecool ☎️ 01:23, 28 September 2025 (UTC) @Usedtobecool NORG states...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 May 21
Minggu, 2020-10-25 08:08:03

type of coverage does not help establish notability. See WP:ORGIND and WP:PRSOURCE. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:50, 21 May 2020 (UTC) @Greg c1988: InterGame...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 November 15
Jumat, 2023-03-03 18:49:43

is totally not congruent with what is in the article. Additionally, WP:PRSOURCE says we can not use press releases as sources, which means you cannot use...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tenio Popmintchev
Selasa, 2026-02-03 00:54:53

but otherwise good catch with the source of the article. I've add WP:PRSOURCE to the relevent box. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 01:23, 30 January 2026 (UTC)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 March 4
Senin, 2020-03-16 05:25:21

Reuters Press Release mentioned above generally do not qualify (see WP:PRSOURCE). Further, I am not aware that the notability criteria is satisfied by...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 May 30
Selasa, 2023-04-11 15:25:32

references belong to blogs and recondite trade publications or fall under WP:PRSOURCE, and the claims of working on various Hollywood projects are totally unsourced...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1099
Selasa, 2024-11-05 02:16:50

(talk) 03:43, 14 March 2021 (UTC) Hi, Hardyisback11188. Please see WP:PRSOURCE for why not one of the sources you listed (ignoring the fact that they're...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 October 17
Selasa, 2022-10-25 17:02:34

Newswire is not a newspaper, it is a distributor of press releases and per WP:PRSOURCE what you get from it does not count towards notability. The Multifamilybiz...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1131
Sabtu, 2022-08-06 00:54:58

be referred. *There is a useful guidline on press-release sources: WP:PRSOURCE. --Gpkp [u • t • c] 07:16, 15 November 2021 (UTC) Gpkp, you or I may believe...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 May 28
Sabtu, 2022-06-11 12:57:23

in race series. The general concern outlined for press releases at WP:PRSOURCE seems to be focused on how press releases can include undue praise. Also...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1143
Rabu, 2025-10-15 00:07:15

best---- work? Sweeto dweeto (talk) 20:37, 18 February 2022 (UTC) No. See WP:PRSOURCE. casualdejekyll 21:05, 18 February 2022 (UTC) Sweeto dweeto, press releases...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 March 9
Sabtu, 2020-03-21 12:20:38

company that are reprinted elsewhere are not independent sources. See WP:PRSOURCE. --MarioGom (talk) 00:50, 10 March 2020 (UTC) MarioGom: your right, but...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 January 4
Jumat, 2022-01-14 00:58:37

press release, or press announcement on about the same date, and per WP:PRSOURCE "Press releases and articles written from press releases cannot be used...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 August 23
Jumat, 2021-09-03 06:37:07

is a PR news release.. Joojay (talk) 16:13, 26 August 2021 (UTC) See WP:PRSOURCE. The TechRadar source is not significant coverage, per WP:CORPDEPTH. The...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 January 14
Jumat, 2023-03-03 18:45:03

GNG terms - if that were so where on earth would that lead? Well, see WP:PRSOURCE. Regardless, I did miss the actualitte/mymodernmet sources which are plainly...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 October 23
Kamis, 2021-11-04 12:46:11

20:36, 30 October 2021 (UTC) @Sucker for All, please read WP:PRSOURCE. You are literally arguing with people who have tens of thousands of edits...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 January 22
Selasa, 2021-02-02 12:35:12

Finance page is a press release, which are classed as non-independent at WP:PRSOURCE. I have also consulted the article you mentioned. (Here's a link if other...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 October 5
Kamis, 2022-10-13 13:40:48

which means they are not independent and can't establish notability (WP:PRSOURCE). Coverage of a student's murder does not lend notability to the school...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 December 19
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:24:16

are obviously some sources just based on company press release (see WP:PRSOURCE. There is nothing that could be called independent. Farooqahmadbhat (talk)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yomiko Readman
Jumat, 2025-12-19 15:20:52

the recommendations outlined at WP:NFCHAR. Most of them are either WP:PRSOURCEs or else reviews of the series in general which only mention Yomiko in...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharifa Yazmeen
Selasa, 2026-02-10 11:07:44

sources can be used to demonstrate notability. You may want to review WP:PRSOURCE and WP:COISOURCE. —BrechtBro (talk) 03:50, 31 January 2026 (UTC) Wikipedia:Independent...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayank Shekhar
Senin, 2025-12-22 07:55:17

Print is a press release and is not at all independent nor reliable per WP:PRSOURCE. Please share your “reliable sources” here. GrabUp - Talk 01:57, 21 July...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1032
Jumat, 2021-06-11 02:46:35

not written by a contributor. I don't think it's fair to flag it as WP:PRSOURCE, given that the focus of the article is very much on GraphBLAS and its...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 June 16
Rabu, 2025-06-25 00:58:41

Dario Item's role as Ambassador of Antigua and Barbuda. NO evidence of WP:PRSOURCE as User:Arcaist claims. O'Murchu, Cynthia; Smith, Robert; Ashworth, Louis;...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 May 5
Senin, 2026-05-25 12:08:26

limited number of WP:PRSOURCEs. In an article about an individual visual novel, we can disclose this potential bias in a PRSOURCE implicitly by stating...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galactic Theme
Sabtu, 2024-09-21 22:42:16

}}—curated from the article but said press release was not linked. WP:PRSOURCE I don’t consider this reliable per this link not really ✘ No https://encomium...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/December 2022
Minggu, 2026-02-08 19:01:30

reliable when it's just recycling a press-release. See churnalism and WP:PRSOURCE. As for this discussion, this seems to be a formal part II in which we...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liis Koger
Sabtu, 2025-11-22 10:19:07

er-avab-personaalnaituse Roughly half of the text is quotes, likely WP:PRSOURCE "simply recycling a press release (a practice called 'churnalism')." WP:ROUTINE...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 January 26
Selasa, 2026-04-14 12:35:19

but otherwise good catch with the source of the article. I've add WP:PRSOURCE to the relevent box. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 01:23, 30 January 2026 (UTC)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 September 8
Senin, 2024-09-16 14:01:12

}}—curated from the article but said press release was not linked. WP:PRSOURCE I don’t consider this reliable per this link not really ✘ No https://encomium...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolle Verma
Minggu, 2024-12-29 22:59:04

These two have identical copy, indicating that they they likely just WP:PRSOURCEs and not independent journalism. ~ Presumably accurate information about...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 488
Rabu, 2025-10-15 07:15:39

without providing any coverage. Thus, these spoilers should be treated as WP:PRSOURCE, following the sentence "Many less reputable news sources will write an...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 January 8
Kamis, 2025-01-16 09:16:11

press releases, and other non-independent sources ([24], [25], [26]); WP:PRSOURCE-driven coverage in WP:TRADES publications ([27], [28], [29]); and a WP:PRIMARYSOURCE...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 October 19
Minggu, 2024-10-27 18:20:37

reference is basically a press release, and also isn't evidence per WP:PRSOURCE. I feel like there's not really anything left that indicates notability...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 December 31
Rabu, 2025-01-08 10:04:05

and WP:SIGCOV. None of the sources you assessed as press releases are WP:PRSOURCE and all provide significant coverage of the subject. - Robertjamal12 ~🔔...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 November 3
Senin, 2024-11-11 20:37:26

MolecularPilot 09:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC) Adding that the "news" article is a WP:PRSOURCE and can't prove notability. also this "award" (if you can call it that)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 May 29
Rabu, 2023-06-07 02:59:44

not possible to write a non-PROMO encyclopedia article exclusively from PRSOURCEs. With respect to Timothytyy, CastJared and our IP contributor here, I...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 January 13
Selasa, 2025-01-21 15:10:43

09:55, 4 January 2025 (UTC) FYI, I have updated the above analysis. See WP:PRSOURCE. A press release doesn’t need to directly come from Hive Colab. It can...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 December 22
Senin, 2024-12-30 07:32:56

These two have identical copy, indicating that they they likely just WP:PRSOURCEs and not independent journalism. ~ Presumably accurate information about...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 November 14
Jumat, 2024-11-22 07:28:21

should be but when I said, press release, I am referring to this guide: WP:PRSOURCE. As you have shown above, the sources that validates the existence of this...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 20
Kamis, 2024-05-30 19:16:11

release with a little added text. For our purposes, it's a republished WP:PRSOURCE. The Seattle Times's first reference has Johnson mentioned twice for an...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Source assessment/Battle for Dream Island
Rabu, 2026-04-15 06:59:39

Business Today. July 23, 2024. "Impact Feature" as the writer implies WP:PRSOURCE. Press release. ~ Somewhat goes into detail about Battle for Dream Island...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 September 23
Rabu, 2024-10-02 01:02:45

(talk) 12:14, 27 September 2024 (UTC) Cfaso2000, about source 7, see WP:PRSOURCE. Best, Reading Beans 08:38, 30 September 2024 (UTC) The above discussion...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 September 22
Senin, 2024-09-30 18:52:17

(talk) 21:55, 24 September 2024 (UTC) Delete. Sources are WP:ORGTRIV, WP:PRSOURCE, WP:TRADES or some combination thereof. Fails WP:NCORP and very close to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 December 17
Rabu, 2024-12-25 17:28:18

Arguably the Business Wire source is a press release and would fall under WP:PRSOURCE. Brandon (talk) 16:37, 17 December 2024 (UTC) I'm now officially confused...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 November 14
Minggu, 2025-11-23 20:38:22

er-avab-personaalnaituse Roughly half of the text is quotes, likely WP:PRSOURCE "simply recycling a press release (a practice called 'churnalism')." WP:ROUTINE...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 493
Selasa, 2025-11-11 00:33:34

verbatim from the museum's About page. The website should be considered WP:PRSOURCE. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 12:47, 31 October 2025 (UTC) To add to my earlier comment...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 November 4
Selasa, 2024-11-12 07:41:39

mix of WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS or affiliated/non-independent sources like WP:PRSOURCE and official bios. Nothing else useful found in WP:BEFORE search. Dclemens1971...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 407
Rabu, 2026-01-07 00:07:29

below for FSF cite). David_Gerard, Even if it is a "press release", WP:PRSOURCE says "Press releases cannot be used to support claims of notability and...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 86
Selasa, 2025-07-15 18:07:42

articles but it can be used cautiously for other assertions per Wikipedia:PRSOURCE, such as uncontroversial fact. And as mentioned above, ST is independent...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Banking & Finance Review
Kamis, 2026-02-26 21:15:38

for Wikipedia articles (see Wikipedia:Independent sources, especially WP:PRSOURCE) and do not contribute to notability (see Wikipedia:Notability (organizations...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 486
Kamis, 2025-08-21 00:27:45

not. However, it focuses on press releases from what I can tell, so WP:PRSOURCE applies. I believe that Hipal is correct that there is nothing here to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 August 8
Rabu, 2023-08-16 08:45:00

press releases, which aren't indicative of notability according to WP:PRSOURCE, so I agree. Aamri2 (talk) 21:29, 8 August 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 April 15
Kamis, 2026-04-23 13:51:58

seems like conflict of interest and rather WP:SELF primary source and WP:PRSOURCE. The tweets amount to their company's own press releases. The burden to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 September 22
Rabu, 2025-10-01 03:45:04

was in the tweets, they are not independent secondary sources. See WP:PRSOURCE. — Usedtobecool ☎️ 01:23, 28 September 2025 (UTC) @Usedtobecool NORG states...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 February 15
Minggu, 2025-02-23 15:23:03

Comment: Two of the ITO sources are press releases and therefore fail WP:PRSOURCE, while the "Digital Platforms and Services" page only contains a single...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 November 10
Senin, 2024-11-18 19:18:20

her [26] and a press release which can't count towards notability per WP:PRSOURCE [27]. She also doesn't meet the more specific WP:NACTOR either, which requires...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 29
Kamis, 2025-05-08 06:58:43

noted above, this is a near-verbatim reprint of a press release, see WP:PRSOURCE, from Cooley's company and thus not independent. Irish Times: an obituary...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 446
Selasa, 2024-08-13 05:20:48

pertaining to the label you're using.” He is not ready to accept what WP:PRSOURCE says: “A press release is clearly not an independent source as it is usually...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 October 26
Minggu, 2024-11-03 16:53:54

statement cannot be reliable or considered to be from a WP:NPOV. Per WP:PRSOURCE "Press releases cannot be used to support claims of notability and should...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 February 16
Selasa, 2026-02-24 06:59:51

multiple outlets publishing similar article within a narrow timeframe. Per WP:PRSOURCE, such source is not independent, also indicates one-off publicity rather...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 December 19
Kamis, 2023-12-28 13:31:21

agency "AA" source only quotes a Hamas press release verbatim, see WP:PRSOURCE - "Press releases cannot be used to support claims of notability". Marokwitz...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 April 4
Rabu, 2023-04-12 14:52:55

are not WP:RS and this one is reliable (though it might fall under WP:PRSOURCE, I am not sure yet). 1 RS is still not enough, though admittedly I did...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 October 10
Jumat, 2024-10-18 06:44:27

fails WP:NCORP. All the coverage available consists of press releases (WP:PRSOURCE), niche WP:TRADES publications not contributing to notability, and WP:ORGTRIV...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive371
Jumat, 2025-10-31 07:16:56

from the original press release, with some bits chopped out. The essay WP:PRSOURCE makes points I agree with. As for whether Octane has a reputation for fact-checking...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 February 4
Jumat, 2026-02-13 00:04:31

multiple outlets publishing similar article within a narrow timeframe. Per WP:PRSOURCE, such source is not independent, also indicates one-off publicity rather...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 25
Selasa, 2024-04-02 15:35:58

coverage such as press releases [...] is not significant coverage", WP:PRSOURCE "A press release is clearly not an independent source"), so bringing it...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 February 2
Selasa, 2026-02-10 21:17:51

sources can be used to demonstrate notability. You may want to review WP:PRSOURCE and WP:COISOURCE. —BrechtBro (talk) 03:50, 31 January 2026 (UTC) Wikipedia:Independent...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 14
Sabtu, 2024-06-22 05:43:10

independent. At the top it says "Пресс-релизы," or press release See WP:PRSOURCE. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:07, 8 June 2024 (UTC) Is this one a press release...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 December 13
Jumat, 2023-12-22 09:42:10

America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:13, 14 December 2023 (UTC) Delete. Per WP:PRSOURCE nearly all the sources on the page are non-significant, so this fails WP:NCORP...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 July 18
Jumat, 2024-07-26 14:17:15

Print is a press release and is not at all independent nor reliable per WP:PRSOURCE. Please share your “reliable sources” here. GrabUp - Talk 01:57, 21 July...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 December 4
Kamis, 2024-12-12 08:08:31

N A press release posted by Drysdale's company on BusinessWire. Per WP:PRSOURCE, A press release is clearly not an independent source as it is usually...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 28
Rabu, 2025-05-07 16:01:26

presumed significant coverage and must be independent of the subject. WP:PRSOURCE clearly states that "A press release is clearly not an independent source...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 June 6
Senin, 2025-06-16 02:39:24

run of the mill information, probably based on a press release. See WP:PRSOURCE. Autocar might work as one source, but it only has two sentences about...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 January 31
Minggu, 2026-02-08 22:56:12

used for the first time on the succeeding edits. As keeping with the WP:PRSOURCE, the supposedly WP:RS is entitled "Here's What Fans Are Saying". Howard...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 November 8
Sabtu, 2024-11-16 08:54:49

Talk! 08:49, 8 November 2024 (UTC) Delete as current references are WP:PRSOURCEs either from the US or Iraq governments and "cannot be used towards claims...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive364
Selasa, 2025-10-07 19:27:39

2024 (UTC) The relevant policies on press releases are explained at WP:PRSOURCE. I deny that I am Righting Great Wrongs. I contend that I am simply applying...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 February 23
Rabu, 2026-03-04 20:08:33

multiple outlets publishing similar article within a narrow timeframe. Per WP:PRSOURCE, such source is not independent, also indicates one-off publicity rather...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1250
Jumat, 2025-03-21 03:35:06

subpage location. Rjjiii (talk) 13:07, 3 March 2025 (UTC) As noted at WP:PRSOURCE press releases from organizations are often non-independent and self-published...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 September 17
Rabu, 2024-09-25 09:38:03

independent, reliable sources. They are limited to WP:INTERVIEWS, WP:PRSOURCEs, and WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS. His awards are the kind of "30 under 30" cruft...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 September 29
Senin, 2024-10-07 11:27:02

not WP:SIGCOV. As for WP:NFILMMAKER, I saw news coverage (but more WP:PRSOURCEs of some film festival category wins, but no reviews of his work in independent...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 December 11
Jumat, 2025-12-19 15:30:22

the recommendations outlined at WP:NFCHAR. Most of them are either WP:PRSOURCEs or else reviews of the series in general which only mention Yomiko in...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 14
Jumat, 2023-06-23 13:01:40

maybe), but maybe somewhat less so and at least it's independent and not PRSOURCE. Given the coverage and article both focus on it as a business entity and...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 26
Rabu, 2023-07-05 04:11:09

JSTOR · TWL) Article created by a UPE/COI editor, consisting largely of WP:PRSOURCEs. I cannot find reliable, independent coverage of the subject and his company...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 20
Sabtu, 2025-05-31 19:02:10

does apply here with regards to a government press release (see also WP:PRSOURCE). ABOUTSELF applies to each source individually, so a PR statement by the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 February 19
Jumat, 2026-02-27 14:53:36

for Wikipedia articles (see Wikipedia:Independent sources, especially WP:PRSOURCE) and do not contribute to notability (see Wikipedia:Notability (organizations...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1181
Minggu, 2026-02-15 00:10:40

WP:SOCKPUPPETRY and has persistently dismissed secondary sources as WP:PRSOURCE without evidence. The matter moved to a full-on discussion that reached...

Click to read more »