DOKUMEN123.COM

The deletion process encompasses the processes involved in implementing and recording the community's decisions to delete or keep articles, media, and...

result of the discussion was: procedural close, inappropriate venue (WP:PCLOSE). Disambiguation pages fall under the jurisdiction of articles for deletion...

result of the discussion was: procedural close - inappropriate venue (WP:PCLOSE). @Kirbanzo, Paulmcdonald, and SmokeyJoe: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List...

made to this page. The result of the discussion was: procedural close (WP:PCLOSE); nomination is an immediate objection to a prior deletion outcome, see...

result of the discussion was: procedural close, inappropriate venue, WP:PCLOSE. @Widefox and SmokeyJoe: Listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobile...

G6 by Maile66. Also would have been eligible for a procedural close (WP:PCLOSE) due to this being the inappropriate venue to discuss a redirect. (non-admin...

result of the discussion was: procedural close, inappropriate venue, WP:PCLOSE. @Purplebackpack89: You may take this to AfD to seek deletion or consult...

result of the discussion was: procedural close - inappropriate venue (WP:PCLOSE). See Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 March 27#Template:Clickable...

to this page.‎ The result was non-admin closure of incomplete AfD per WP:PCLOSE and Wikipedia:Non-admin_closure#Appropriate_closure. (AfD incomplete. Rationale...

made to this page. The result of the discussion was: procedural close (WP:PCLOSE); Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/TimedText:Baby Doll Sample.ogg.hi.srt...

result of the discussion was: procedural close, inappropriate venue (WP:PCLOSE). Opening a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Edelman (disambiguation)...

made to this page. The result of the discussion was: procedural close (WP:PCLOSE). @Snowded: AfD is the proper venue to seek the deletion of Wreathgate;...

discussion was: procedural close due to this being the innapropriate venue (WP:PCLOSE). @StraussInTheHouse: Redirects should be listed at redirects for discussion...

result of the discussion was: procedural close, inappropriate venue (WP:PCLOSE). @Pigsonthewing: Feel free to start a discussion about this template at...

made to this page. The result of the discussion was: procedural close. (WP:PCLOSE). Inappropriate venue. @Zxcvbnm: Feel free to start a discussion at RfD:...

result of the discussion was: procedural close - inappropriate venue (WP:PCLOSE). @PaoloM1927: Redirects should be nominated at redirects for discussion...

made to this page. The result of the discussion was: procedural close. (WP:PCLOSE). Inappropriate venue. @Tilla and GB fan: The proper place to nominate redirects...

result of the discussion was: procedural close - inappropriate venue (WP:PCLOSE). @WorldBoy: Draft:Harsshit Abhiraj is now a redirect, so the appropriate...

to this page.‎ The result was Keep - Malformed AfD Closing this per WP:PCLOSE, nothing prevents a re-nomination that fully implements all the requirements...

made to this page. The result of the discussion was: procedural close (WP:PCLOSE). See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All-time table of the FIFA World Cup...

made to this page. The result of the discussion was: procedural close (WP:PCLOSE). @Tom (LT): I believe you meant to list Interstitial cell at AfD, not Talk:Interstitial...

made to this page. The result of the discussion was: procedural close (WP:PCLOSE), inappropriate venue. @Tornado chaser, Ianmacm, MrX, and Gene93k: See...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was procedural close per WP:PCLOSE, because AfD is the wrong forum for discussing redirects. I have moved the...

@TheJoyfulTentmaker That's not a valid argument for a procedural close per WP:PCLOSE. If you think that there is WP:SIGCOV, then by all means provide evidence...

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC) Can this discussion be closed as WP:PCLOSE? ThisIsSeanJ (talk) 07:24, 2 May 2023 (UTC) Comment - I've moved it back...

to this page.‎ The result was non-admin closure of incomplete AfD per WP:PCLOSE and Wikipedia:Non-admin_closure#Appropriate_closure. (AfD incomplete. Rationale...

close may be in order here per the "venue inappropriate" criterion of WP:PCLOSE. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 18:50, 27 July 2018 (UTC) Above IP is a sock of...

result of the discussion was procedural close, inappropriate venue (WP:PCLOSE). @Bodhi Peace: See WP:RM/TR or Template:Db-move for such requests in the...

Wikipedia Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No Function details: Closing per WP:PCLOSE AfD discussions when nominated pages do not exist, e.g. when they've been...

while (fgets(line, sizeof(line), fp)) printf("Got this line: %s", line); pclose(fp); There are probably nicer ways to do this in more idiomatic C++, but...

to this section. The result of the discussion was procedural close (WP:PCLOSE); inappropriate venue. @Aza24: Feel free to take the suggestion made by...

no further discussion on ANI is needed. Could some uninvolved editor WP:PCLOSE this? Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 13:46, 26 February 2020 (UTC) The...

considered "disruptive", and therefore be closed procedurally or early (WP:PCLOSE WP:EARLY). But note that the emptying editor can be someone else than whoever...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was procedural close per WP:PCLOSE, because AfD is the wrong forum for discussing redirects. I have moved the...

to this page.‎ The result was Keep - Malformed AfD Closing this per WP:PCLOSE, nothing prevents a re-nomination that fully implements all the requirements...

no one referred to PCLOSE in either discussion. SpinningSpark 14:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC) Someone did indeed refer to PCLOSE, in this edit.—S Marshall T/C...

discussion without prejudice to its being reopened at that location. See WP:PCLOSE. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC) The category was...

Comment, note that the second closure was an appropriate early close per WP:PCLOSE even while it did not meet WP:SPK criteria. So in theory the first closure...

no one referred to PCLOSE in either discussion. SpinningSpark 14:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC) Someone did indeed refer to PCLOSE, in this edit.—S Marshall T/C...

support a bigger result of austerity measure.s Wouldn't we post the bbc pclosing?Lihaas (talk) 20:26, 11 June 2013 (UTC) Support National public broadcasting...

Comment, note that the second closure was an appropriate early close per WP:PCLOSE even while it did not meet WP:SPK criteria. So in theory the first closure...

discussion without prejudice to its being reopened at that location. See WP:PCLOSE. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC) The category was...

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC) Can this discussion be closed as WP:PCLOSE? ThisIsSeanJ (talk) 07:24, 2 May 2023 (UTC) Comment - I've moved it back...

@TheJoyfulTentmaker That's not a valid argument for a procedural close per WP:PCLOSE. If you think that there is WP:SIGCOV, then by all means provide evidence...