Search Results: Wikipedia:ORGAWARDS
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elite SEM
Kamis, 2025-11-13 17:58:53bunch of them. Most of the awards listed do not meet the criteria at WP:ORGAWARDS and even if they did, an article on the company focused exclusively on...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AutoAnything (3rd nomination)
Sabtu, 2025-11-22 08:22:03added promotional content, like sponsorships, trivial rankings (see WP:ORGAWARDS), and Better Business Bureau ratings. Like many COI works, the sources...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C&A Industries, Inc
Kamis, 2025-11-13 10:03:31trivial rankings that do not establish notability or warrant inclusion. WP:ORGAWARDS has more on my opinion about awards/rankings like these. There are no...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BreezoMeter
Rabu, 2025-12-03 04:32:19Contains a long list of non notable awards which should not be added per WP:ORGAWARDS Mar11 (talk) 17:28, 2 January 2018 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crenshaw Communications
Senin, 2025-11-17 06:13:44this field. I have written some additional advice in this area at WP:ORGAWARDS. Although I could be wrong, I glanced at your contributions and it gave...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banc De Binary (2nd nomination)
Senin, 2025-11-17 00:23:33primary sources for promotional information about its awards (see WP:ORGAWARDS), and junk sources to describe its products. Investopedia is cited a few...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andersen Corporation
Jumat, 2025-12-12 02:28:21has won. But the discussion does not belong on Wikipedia; please see WP:ORGAWARDS. The article also discusses competitors that Andersen has bought — but...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walek & Associates
Rabu, 2025-11-19 01:01:23irrelevant to the firm page and there are too many awards (please see WP:ORGAWARDS regarding what I feel are proper sources for awards). Also I do not believe...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HYCM
Senin, 2025-12-01 03:15:46September 2017 (UTC) Keep - Needs a complete re-write and removal of WP:ORGAWARDS, but the subject passes GNG. Contains several references. Mar11 (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive274
Jumat, 2020-05-08 16:35:28primary sources, etc.) and they can be politely rejected, pointed to WP:ORGAWARDS, etc.. Disclosure: I am a sponsored editor. CorporateM (Talk) 15:46, 30...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 July 20
Jumat, 2020-07-31 11:22:05has won. But the discussion does not belong on Wikipedia; please see WP:ORGAWARDS. The article also discusses competitors that Andersen has bought — but...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 September 20
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:29:51September 2017 (UTC) Keep - Needs a complete re-write and removal of WP:ORGAWARDS, but the subject passes GNG. Contains several references. Mar11 (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 January 9
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:18:22Contains a long list of non notable awards which should not be added per WP:ORGAWARDS Mar11 (talk) 17:28, 2 January 2018 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 July 12
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:12:24added promotional content, like sponsorships, trivial rankings (see WP:ORGAWARDS), and Better Business Bureau ratings. Like many COI works, the sources...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 December 10
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:12:09this field. I have written some additional advice in this area at WP:ORGAWARDS. Although I could be wrong, I glanced at your contributions and it gave...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 July 12
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:40:18trivial rankings that do not establish notability or warrant inclusion. WP:ORGAWARDS has more on my opinion about awards/rankings like these. There are no...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 December 25
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:11:09irrelevant to the firm page and there are too many awards (please see WP:ORGAWARDS regarding what I feel are proper sources for awards). Also I do not believe...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 June 27
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:37:19bunch of them. Most of the awards listed do not meet the criteria at WP:ORGAWARDS and even if they did, an article on the company focused exclusively on...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 June 4
Rabu, 2023-03-01 12:07:18primary sources for promotional information about its awards (see WP:ORGAWARDS), and junk sources to describe its products. Investopedia is cited a few...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 168
Minggu, 2021-03-14 10:42:25found that CorporateM himself cited a section of the essay he wrote, WP:ORGAWARDS on my talk page back in 2014 [2], without mentioning that it was written...
Click to read more »