DOKUMEN123.COM

if a "Praise of..." article was created instead). Shortcuts WP:OKFORKWP:OKFORK WP:GOODFORKWP:GOODFORK Except for the types presented above, content forks...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:01, 21 June 2023 (UTC) Keep: Pass GNG. It's an WP:OKFORK. CastJared (talk) 09:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC) Keep. Agree with Novem Linguae...

notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 16:32, 16 December 2023 (UTC) Keep WP:OKFORK - the Economy of Azerbaijan article clearly states that it covers the present...

what has been done in other articles. jp×g 08:42, 29 July 2023 (UTC) Keep OKFORK, NLIST, GNG —siroχo 09:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC) Keep Clearly notable subject...

BRICS Ministers of Communications annual meeting; perfectly reasonable WP:OKFORK (far too much content to fit into the Ministry article itself); every single...

Indonesia. Fermiboson (talk) 15:03, 12 December 2025 (UTC) Keep This is WP:OKFORK, the relevant guideline here is MOS:DISCOGRAPHY which states, Musicians...

is uncensored. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 23:31, 31 March 2025 (UTC) Keep WP:OKFORK of March for Our Lives given that article's size. As for satisfying WP:NEVENT...

contribs) 17:15, 15 February 2023 (UTC) Keep perfectly in line with WP:OKFORK. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 06:15, 18 February 2023 (UTC) The above discussion...

related to an event. But if you prefer a non-list-related guideline, WP:OKFORK applies. And sources have been added anyway. ~2026-33418-5 (talk) 17:57...

notability. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:03, 6 April 2025 (UTC) Keep per GNG + OKFORK ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:27, 6 April 2025 (UTC) Keep We're venturing...

April 2023 (UTC) Keep: For such reason, it is an acceptable fork per WP:OKFORK. CastJared (talk) 15:30, 28 April 2023 (UTC) Can you clarify what you mean...

related to an event. But if you prefer a non-list-related guideline, WP:OKFORK applies. And sources have been added anyway. ~2026-33418-5 (talk) 17:56...

related to an event. But if you prefer a non-list-related guideline, WP:OKFORK applies. And sources have been added anyway. ~2026-33418-5 (talk) 17:56...

indicate a stand alone article is perfecly reasonable, in line with WP:OKFORK, WP:BRANCH, and satisfying the GNG. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 13:16,...

to the set/class. Third, the list can be reasonably justified as an WP:OKFORK of Presidency of Dmitry Medvedev#Foreign policy. Fourth, if Kremlin.ru is...

information into other articles. In fact, one can also think of this as an WP:OKFORK from both articles. (We would not want Google's relationship with Wikipedia...

cited to date is directories or not reliable. Sourcing does not justify WP:OKFORK, WP:NOPAGE applies. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 05:36, 16 February 2025...

the performer, eg [2]. Even if it wasn't notable on its own, it's an WP:OKFORK by content and length, (Overlap excluded, articles together are above 6000...

--CNMall41 (talk) 07:20, 26 January 2026 (UTC) In any case, this list is a WP:OKFORK for the main page which is notable, has encyclopedic value and prevents...

songs and Music. Sricsi (talk) 20:08, 25 March 2025 (UTC) Keep per GNG and OKFORK. WP:NSONG says, "Notability aside, a standalone article is appropriate only...

history for more than a century and a half. This is a perfectly reasonable WP:OKFORK. Regards,--Goldsztajn (talk) 02:17, 23 August 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

on the subject of her role in the campaign to have Assange released, WP:OKFORK. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 07:26, 6 July 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

the sourcing would be helpful as with the contention that this is an WP:OKFORK. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Goldsztajn (talk) 22:13...

WP:NEVENT and the WP:GNG. Furthermore, this is more than apporpriate as an WP:OKFORK. Certiainly if the 2024 comp was an abject failure or was cancelled, I could...

Robbiegibbons (talk) 04:23, 22 August 2024 (UTC) The problem is not WP:OKFORK, the problem is original research. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 05:45, 22...

comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 16:02, 16 December 2024 (UTC) Keep OKFORK, as well as important to not conflate the movements of anti-fascism and...

The Soviet-Afghan war article is over-WP:SIZE-ed and in dire need of WP:OKFORKing; merging is not a solution. Numerous sources discuss the interventions...

is a CONTENTFORK, where I see an appropriate WP:SPINOUT (which is an WP:OKFORK). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:01, 8 March 2023 (UTC) Switched from Keep to Weak...

encyclopaedic material, not ”dictionary” content 2) presented as lists that are wp:OKFORK of other pages. So that none of the first two reasons advanced for deletion...

to the set/class. Third, the list can be reasonably justified as an WP:OKFORK of Presidency of Dmitry Medvedev#Foreign policy. Fourth, if Kremlin.ru is...

notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 16:32, 16 December 2023 (UTC) Keep WP:OKFORK - the Economy of Azerbaijan article clearly states that it covers the present...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:01, 21 June 2023 (UTC) Keep: Pass GNG. It's an WP:OKFORK. CastJared (talk) 09:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC) Keep. Agree with Novem Linguae...

history for more than a century and a half. This is a perfectly reasonable WP:OKFORK. Regards,--Goldsztajn (talk) 02:17, 23 August 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

--CNMall41 (talk) 07:20, 26 January 2026 (UTC) In any case, this list is a WP:OKFORK for the main page which is notable, has encyclopedic value and prevents...

related to an event. But if you prefer a non-list-related guideline, WP:OKFORK applies. And sources have been added anyway. ~2026-33418-5 (talk) 17:56...

is uncensored. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 23:31, 31 March 2025 (UTC) Keep WP:OKFORK of March for Our Lives given that article's size. As for satisfying WP:NEVENT...

"unambiguous" threshold is not met. Better to be tested at AfD against NLIST and/or OKFORK. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 00:17, 2 April 2023 (UTC) Overturn these might...

the performer, eg [68]. Even if it wasn't notable on its own, it's an WP:OKFORK by content and length, (Overlap excluded, articles together are above 6000...

notability. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:03, 6 April 2025 (UTC) Keep per GNG + OKFORK ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:27, 6 April 2025 (UTC) Keep We're venturing...

the sourcing would be helpful as with the contention that this is an WP:OKFORK. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Goldsztajn (talk) 22:13...

April 2023 (UTC) Keep: For such reason, it is an acceptable fork per WP:OKFORK. CastJared (talk) 15:30, 28 April 2023 (UTC) Can you clarify what you mean...

on the subject of her role in the campaign to have Assange released, WP:OKFORK. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 07:26, 6 July 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

Indonesia. Fermiboson (talk) 15:03, 12 December 2025 (UTC) Keep This is WP:OKFORK, the relevant guideline here is MOS:DISCOGRAPHY which states, Musicians...

BRICS Ministers of Communications annual meeting; perfectly reasonable WP:OKFORK (far too much content to fit into the Ministry article itself); every single...

cited to date is directories or not reliable. Sourcing does not justify WP:OKFORK, WP:NOPAGE applies. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 05:36, 16 February 2025...

songs and Music. Sricsi (talk) 20:08, 25 March 2025 (UTC) Keep per GNG and OKFORK. WP:NSONG says, "Notability aside, a standalone article is appropriate only...

indicate a stand alone article is perfecly reasonable, in line with WP:OKFORK, WP:BRANCH, and satisfying the GNG. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 13:16,...

is a CONTENTFORK, where I see an appropriate WP:SPINOUT (which is an WP:OKFORK). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:01, 8 March 2023 (UTC) Switched from Keep to Weak...

contribs) 17:15, 15 February 2023 (UTC) Keep perfectly in line with WP:OKFORK. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 06:15, 18 February 2023 (UTC) The above discussion...

WP:NEVENT and the WP:GNG. Furthermore, this is more than apporpriate as an WP:OKFORK. Certiainly if the 2024 comp was an abject failure or was cancelled, I could...

comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 16:02, 16 December 2024 (UTC) Keep OKFORK, as well as important to not conflate the movements of anti-fascism and...

information into other articles. In fact, one can also think of this as an WP:OKFORK from both articles. (We would not want Google's relationship with Wikipedia...

related to an event. But if you prefer a non-list-related guideline, WP:OKFORK applies. And sources have been added anyway. ~2026-33418-5 (talk) 17:56...

The Soviet-Afghan war article is over-WP:SIZE-ed and in dire need of WP:OKFORKing; merging is not a solution. Numerous sources discuss the interventions...

what has been done in other articles. jp×g 08:42, 29 July 2023 (UTC) Keep OKFORK, NLIST, GNG —siroχo 09:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC) Keep Clearly notable subject...

encyclopaedic material, not ”dictionary” content 2) presented as lists that are wp:OKFORK of other pages. So that none of the first two reasons advanced for deletion...

"unambiguous" threshold is not met. Better to be tested at AfD against NLIST and/or OKFORK. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 00:17, 2 April 2023 (UTC) Overturn these might...