Wikipedia:NPOVFACT

Search Results: Wikipedia:NPOVFACT

Redirect to:

Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Point of view forks

This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:

From a merge: This is a redirect from a page that was merged into another page. This redirect was kept in order to preserve the edit history of this page after its content was merged into the content of the target page. Please do not remove the tag that generates this text (unless the need to recreate content on this page has been demonstrated) or delete this page.
- For redirects with substantive page histories that did not result from page merges use {{R with history}} instead.

From a shortcut: This is a redirect from a shortcut in any namespace to a page in any namespace.
- Shortcuts are wikilinked on community pages, talk pages, and edit summaries, but not in mainspace articles.

To a project page: This is a redirect from any page inside or outside of project (Wikipedia: or WP:) space to any page within the project namespace (not to a project talk page). The above category link leads to a list of redirects from inside project space. Redirects from outside project space are automatically sorted to Category:Redirects to project namespace.

To an embedded anchor: This is a redirect from a topic that does not have its own page to an embedded anchor on the redirect's target page.
- An {{anchor|anchor name}} or {{visible anchor}} template, an HTML element with id="anchor name", or an |id=anchor name parameter can be placed at the beginning of a paragraph, substituted into a section header, or inserted within a table. Anchors may also be old section headers that have since been renamed, in order to preserve existing internal and external links.
- Although section headers of the form ==(Header name)== act as anchors by default, with them use {{R to section}} instead.

When appropriate, protection levels are automatically sensed, described and categorized.

Wikipedia:Neutral point of view

Rabu, 2026-05-27 19:29:06

All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Lotus Conglomerate

Senin, 2025-12-22 11:07:56

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article created as WP:NPOVFACT violation to disparage a WP:BLP [1]. Looks multiple unconnected companies...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P05

Jumat, 2025-12-19 08:00:20

This does not need its own page per WP:NOPAGE as this page is mere WP:NPOVFACT-- "an attempt to evade the neutrality policy by creating a new article...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Illegal deregulation in New York City

Rabu, 2024-08-14 07:50:15

be covered in that article, so the articles ought to be merged. See WP:NPOVFACT and WP:CFORK. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 19:13, 9 August 2024 (UTC) Incorrect...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sprinklr deal controversy

Jumat, 2025-12-12 17:05:35

doesn't warrant its own article. Seems to be a POV fork that violates WP:NPOVFACT. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 23:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/COVID-19 vaccine side effects

Selasa, 2025-12-16 02:47:51

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Nominating this for deletion based on WP:NPOVFACT and WP:NOPAGE. Let me state at the top that the question is not whether...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Sniper (film) controversies

Kamis, 2025-11-13 04:17:00

Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 12:48, 29 January 2015 (UTC) Also, WP:NPOVFACT is pertinent: "This type of split is permissible only if written from a...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barack Obama on Twitter

Sabtu, 2025-11-29 20:21:15

be an attempt to evade the consensus process at another article. See WP:NPOVFACT. Also see WP:NOTPAPER: "Splitting long articles and leaving adequate summaries...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 May 19

Senin, 2022-05-30 23:35:03

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Nominating this for deletion based on WP:NPOVFACT and WP:NOPAGE. Let me state at the top that the question is not whether...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mass killings under communist regimes (4th nomination)

Minggu, 2025-12-14 05:02:40

Siebert (talk) 01:26, 23 November 2021 (UTC) Also, the notion that WP:NPOVFACT somehow precludes The Black Book of Communism from being cited elsewhere...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 May 6

Jumat, 2020-05-15 05:26:37

doesn't warrant its own article. Seems to be a POV fork that violates WP:NPOVFACT. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 23:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of dog fighting breeds (2nd nomination)

Selasa, 2025-12-16 07:46:12

misinterpretations by laymen about dog breeds, and it is noncompliant with WP:NPOVFACT. It is a fake list that probably should have been speedy deleted rather...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 January 28

Rabu, 2023-03-01 12:09:29

Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 12:48, 29 January 2015 (UTC) Also, WP:NPOVFACT is pertinent: "This type of split is permissible only if written from a...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 August 9

Rabu, 2022-08-17 18:02:29

misinterpretations by laymen about dog breeds, and it is noncompliant with WP:NPOVFACT. It is a fake list that probably should have been speedy deleted rather...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 July 3

Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:54:14

be an attempt to evade the consensus process at another article. See WP:NPOVFACT. Also see WP:NOTPAPER: "Splitting long articles and leaving adequate summaries...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 November 25

Sabtu, 2021-12-04 06:30:54

Siebert (talk) 01:26, 23 November 2021 (UTC) Also, the notion that WP:NPOVFACT somehow precludes The Black Book of Communism from being cited elsewhere...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 July

Minggu, 2012-07-01 10:48:22

spinout. NPOV and NOTPAPER: Both WP:NPOVFACT and WP:NOTPAPER are the policies that govern article spinout. Under WP:NPOVFACT, all facts on a given subject should...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 July 9

Senin, 2026-03-09 20:41:37

spinout. NPOV and NOTPAPER: Both WP:NPOVFACT and WP:NOTPAPER are the policies that govern article spinout. Under WP:NPOVFACT, all facts on a given subject should...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 July 24

Selasa, 2023-08-01 14:30:02

This does not need its own page per WP:NOPAGE as this page is mere WP:NPOVFACT-- "an attempt to evade the neutrality policy by creating a new article...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 July 24

Kamis, 2024-08-01 11:59:48

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article created as WP:NPOVFACT violation to disparage a WP:BLP [30]. Looks multiple unconnected companies...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 August 7

Kamis, 2024-08-15 09:01:56

be covered in that article, so the articles ought to be merged. See WP:NPOVFACT and WP:CFORK. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 19:13, 9 August 2024 (UTC) Incorrect...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive355

Jumat, 2024-01-26 23:05:51

including biased editing opposed specifically to WP:BLPCOI, WP:BLPTALK, WP:NPOVFACT among other violations are detailed here on the article’s talk page, especially...

Click to read more »