DOKUMEN123.COM

vandalize or add spam to a mass of pages. Shortcuts WP:NOTVANDALISMWP:NOTVANDALISM WP:NOTVANDWP:NOTVAND Although at times the following situations may be...

accusing the editor of vandalism (despite the edit falling under WP:NOTVANDALISM), a rather common problem for Twillisjr (despite repeated explanations...

to spruce up on your understanding of what is vandalism and what is notvandalism. The next time you attempt more than three reverts on the page or any...

November 2024 (UTC) Even if that edit were not a good one, it is [{WP:NOTVANDAL|not vandalism]] and User:Beachweak should not have referred to it as such...

removing the file, but those calling the removal vandalism need to read WP:NOTVANDAL.), Coldcreation should have then either started a discussion on the article's...

accuse other users of vandalism, even after being informed about WP:NOTVANDALISM. On my count, he has accused users of vandalism at least seven times...

talk page. Follow the WP:BRD process. @Jacob Javits, the edits were WP:NOTVANDALISM. Please take some time to read up on Wikipedia policies and guidelines...

allowed under WP:MOSDAB. PamD 18:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC) PamD, WP:NOTVANDALISM and PSGV (fancy acronyms). Even though it isn't vandalism, I strongly...

again. And accused me at my talk page of vandalizing Wikipedia.[279] WP:NOTVANDALISM WP:BOOMERANG. RandomAccount13343413 (talk) 13:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC)...

False vandalism accusation at edit summary despite my edit being WP:NOTVANDALISM[178]. 3) Shouting at me in edit summary.[179] 4) Warning me of edit warring...

accurate on Rotten Tomatoes. 2) see WP:WRONGVERSION 3) that's clearly WP:NOTVANDALISM. Canterbury Tail talk 20:34, 14 February 2022 (UTC) Hello 109.79.68.165...

Heba by sahing "vandalism" ? Content disputes aren't Vandalism (see WP:NOTVANDAL),Heba instead of engaging in civil discussion on Talk:Rathore  she filed...

WP:BLP. The editor should be counseled to read WP:VANDALISM, especially WP:NOTVANDAL, and to use the appropriate warning templates when she/he encounters genuine...

and edit summary's accusation of "vandalism" was entirely wrong per WP:NOTVANDAL. The discussion on the talk is not a great advert for either party, but...

discussion. The thread got closed while I drafted. I dont disagree with the WP:NOTVANDAL block but since I have spent time in drafting my observation, I will post...

discussions. On the other hand, Elibrarysg and Drsharan should look up WP:NOTVANDALISM, and Elibrarysg should realize that 3RR applies to him, too; NE2 already...

reference vandalism has a very specific meaning on Wikipedia, see WP:NOTVANDALISM, you shouldn't accuse someone of vandalism unless it meets that specific...

promotes Nair caste in Nair pages [457].151.200.244.189 IP, that is WP:NOTVANDALISM. It might be disruptive editing, of which vandalism is one subset of...

2022 (UTC) This appears to be a content dispute, I suggest reading WP:NOTVANDALISM. Whether LeaveMeB is right or wrong doesn't make their edits vandalism...

March 2020 (UTC) Sanction being appealed Blocked for violation of WP:NOTVANDAL at this ANI discussion Administrator imposing the sanction El_C (talk ·...

Restoring my comment which was abusively called vandalism but is in fact WP:NOTVANDALISM. 140.247.141.165 (talk) 22:48, 3 May 2012 (UTC) LOL! PwilliamQ99 (talk)...

edit-warring and also stop labeling edits as vandalism when they are WP:NOTVANDALISM. You should also have notified Owain of this discussion, which I have...

mediate this affair.) Also please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:NOTVANDALISM and use WP:user talk pages to post notifications, not the user pages...

Also, please don't falsely call good faith edits "vandalism" — see WP:NOTVANDALISM. Generally, WP:INSTAGRAM isn't a reliable source. If there are indeed...

course of 3 days, which isn't that many) were not "vandalism" (see WP:NOTVANDALISM). And also, not edit warring (see WP:EW), because the IP did not revert...

restricted to 1RR in cases involving Calibrador. Also, please read WP:NOTVANDALISM.- MrX 01:21, 14 September 2016 (UTC) You should read my comments at WT:COI...

semi-protection. I am not a wikilawyer so could not opine whether this was NOTVANDALISM (that sequence from memory, but I can provide the evidence). Again from...

vandalistic action" at WP:AIV[36]. Eventually closed there at 13:36 per WP:NOTVANDALISM[37] 13:03 In a bit of WP:FORUMSHOP, AlexTheWhovian reports Alakzi again...

review WP:CIVIL and WP:AGF. Sneha04 should familiarize themselves with WP:NOTVANDALISM Hongqilim should familiarize themselves with WP:BLUDGEON, WP:BLANKING...

Benchijiguando (talk) 14:28, 13 June 2022 (UTC) Fair point. As is noted at WP:NOTVANDALISM, Edit warring is not vandalism. —C.Fred (talk) 14:47, 13 June 2022 (UTC)...

September. As for 3RR exemptions, be sure to also be aware of what is WP:NOTVANDALISM.—Bagumba (talk) 09:20, 19 September 2022 (UTC) The following discussion...

Interfase is wrong to characterise this content dispute as vandalism, see WP:NOTVANDALISM. They have engaged in forbidden edit-warring. Because of their recurring...

Shantavira|feed me 10:10, 3 December 2024 (UTC) @Ozrocka: Please read WP:NOTVANDAL. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:35, 3 December...

18 August 2022 (UTC) Please read Wikipedia:Vandalism, specifically WP:NOTVANDALISM. Relying on a source that you, personally, do not approve of, does not...

Wikipedia, and what you describe does not fall into that category (see WP:NOTVANDALISM). 97.113.167.129 (talk) 12:23, 10 May 2022 (UTC) When working on the...

this editor's contributions, I wouldn't call this edit vandalism per WP:NOTVANDAL; it might not be an improvement per se and too WP:BOLD, but it's doesn't...

were to report your talk page as vandalism I would direct them to WP:NOTVANDAL and ask them to please specify the edit or edits which they found to be...

definition of the term (see WP:VANDALISM, specifically the part at WP:NOTVANDALISM). 199.208.172.35 (talk) 14:59, 7 September 2023 (UTC) "Sneaky Vandalism"...

Delete: Redundant with Template:poke-cleanup, and not currently in use. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 06:20, 22 September 2005 (UTC) Delete - I am...

After properly editing for a couple days I see what you mean about WP:NOTVANDAL, as well as the scrutiny that an admin would come under for such errors...

which the page will be automatically unprotected. Seems like mostly WP:NOTVANDALISM, though, Poirot09. El_C 21:09, 6 December 2022 (UTC) Harissa (edit |...

PunjabCinema07 (talk) 13:50, 23 January 2020 (UTC) PunjabCinema07, please read WP:NOTVANDAL and retract your statement. Editing disputes, especially when the quality...

draft picks. Rikster2 (talk) 18:17, 2 August 2021 (UTC) Seems like WP:NOTVANDALISM.—Bagumba (talk) 03:29, 3 August 2021 (UTC) Declined See above. Lectonar...

--Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:03, 5 April 2021 (UTC) Note: Please see WP:NOTVANDAL. However, when a whole bunch of people say you need to discuss, you get...

note (here) that speaks vaguely about about "vandalism," etc. (see WP:NOTVANDALISM), is inappropriate. Please make a substantive effort to argue for your...

dispute resolution. Iaof2017, first: that is not vandalism — see WP:NOTVANDALISM. Secondly, you are the one who seem to be in violation of MOS:ETHNICITY...

March 2017 (UTC) @Oshwah: arguing about genres is NOT VANDALISM. See WP:NOTVANDAL and User:Ritchie333/Plain and simple guide to vandalism. Ritchie333 (talk)...

Foreverknowledge (talk · contribs) are over WP:3RR. Please take a look at WP:NOTVANDALISM as the edits appear to me to be made in good faith and not overt vandalism...

Wikipedia, even if you consider their actions misguided, then it's WP:NOTVANDALISM and not a G3 case. R3 is based (in theory) on an objective evaluation...

mentioned before, undoing your poorly sourced original research is WP:NOTVANDALISM. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:02, 18 December 2012 (UTC) Resolved Bushmaster...

asked to, and had been checking their work as it went along. As with WP:NOTVANDAL it's important to not describe edits you believe are mistaken in that...

Jaydoggmarco (talk) 23:10, 21 February 2024 (UTC) @Jaydoggmarco: Please see WP:NOTVANDAL. Also, where did you try to resolve this issue previously? Andy Mabbett...

Semi-protected – Steel 20:00, 5 November 2012 (UTC) Temporary Semi-protection: Notvandalism per se, but a whole host of unsourced edits to a new current event page...

edit the page directly is if there is outright vandalism (but see WP:NOTVANDAL or an egregious breach of our BLP policy (such as if someone added a false...

discussion. Not a COI issue. Use the dispute resolution process and note WP:NOTVANDAL. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:27, 19 April...

edits, or the report itself, none of it is vandalism. Please read WP:NOTVANDAL, and don't send people to the vandalism noticeboard for issues not related...

@TheNewMinistry: Their behaviour is unacceptable, but please read WP:NOTVANDAL. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:18, 30 March...

with full edit summaries/justifications & not disruptive at all (WP:NOTVANDALISM). You haven't read my edit summaries or talk page discussion before posting...

yourself with what is vandalism and what isn't vandalism here: Wikipedia:NOTVANDALISM. This is very important when dealing with vandals because a bad call...

and removing content with the edit summary "vandalism", contrary to WP:NOTVANDAL. Also, claiming exemptions because of BLP can be controversial, and still...

point, but vandalism on Wikipedia is by definition intentional, see WP:NOTVANDAL and the beginning of Wikipedia:Vandalism. It is important not to mislabel...

WP:NOTUSA WP:NOTUSEFUL WP:NOTV WP:NOTVALUABLE WP:NOTVAN WP:NOTVAND WP:NOTVANDAL WP:NOTVANDALISM WP:NOTVIDEOGAME WP:NOTVOTE WP:NOTW WP:NOTWALLOFSHAME WP:NOTWARRING...

(UTC) If it's vandalism, it's vandalism, wherever it happens. But see WP:NOTVANDAL. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:20, 9 December...

16:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC) @CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine: Please see WP:NOTVANDAL. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:59, 11 March...

Untamed1910 (talk) 00:45, 13 September 2025 (UTC) @Untamed1910: Please read WP:NOTVANDAL. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:40, 13 September...

for the clear difference! Hamimh2 (talk) 19:40, 11 May 2026 (UTC) WP:NOTVANDAL covers this. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits...

17:46, 13 October 2025 (UTC) It does not look like vandalism; see WP:NOTVANDAL. More like a mistake. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's...

you have wrongly reported another editor for "vandalism". Please see WP:NOTVANDAL, and WP:AGF. If you make false accusations of vandalism again, your own...

While the edits you describe were unclear, they are not vandalism; see WP:NOTVANDAL. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:27, 22 September...

hijacking would be. --Onorem (talk) 15:03, 6 June 2025 (UTC) Please see WP:NOTVANDAL for more on this. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits...

user you are having a disagreement with, and would recommend you read WP:NOTVANDAL. Consider starting a new, more respectful thread at the talk page to discuss...

automatically unprotected. Joseph2302, speculation ≠ vandalism (please see WP:NOTVANDALISM) Which is to say, vandalism is a narrow subset of disruptive editing...

is desired, {{Independent source inline}} is more appropriate, and WP:NOTVANDALISM is a relevant policy. —Bagumba (talk) 03:43, 25 June 2025 (UTC) I don't...

april fools deletion · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] WP:NOTVANDALISM and per WP:APRILFOOLS, joke deletion discussions are allowed —92.249...

Kingsacrificer (talk) 19:11, 22 September 2025 (UTC) Not vandalism, no. See WP:NOTVANDALISM. You can revert it, following WP:BRD, or you can follow the process described...

incidents" when told to focus on content 18:29, 19 January 2025 - calling a WP:NOTVANDAL edit as vandalism and issues final warning for vandalism [16] Diffs of...

forms of dispute resolution. That is not vandalism. Please review WP:NOTVANDALISM. The IP is repeating what the cited source states: "The letter did not...

which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please refer to WP:NOTVANDALISM, tgeorgescu. Vandalism is a specific subset of disruptive editing, so...

is unsourced, or anything else - then 3RR applies. Have a look at WP:NOTVANDAL, it's very precise in exactly what vandalism is not and will help you...

continue to mislabel their edits as vandalism (these edits are clearly WP:NOTVANDALISM), you will be sanctioned. Jyomon, please use normal capitalization and...

article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Czello, it is WP:NOTVANDALISM. Talk page discussion was started an hour after the IP's last edit. The...

such demonstrable example, are a violation WP:AGF and definition of WP:NOTVANDAL. This user has refused to partake in the WP:BRD cycle, and is forcing...

Korea (Created by me) clearly not following WP:BRD and making huge WP:NOTVANDALISM. I don't have 27/7 to maintain those pages, so please mediate. Regards...

forms of dispute resolution. Hu741f4, please make sure you understand WP:NOTVANDALISM before labeling editing disputes as such. El_C 20:56, 5 October 2023...

(UTC) Question: Vandalism how, ComparingQuantities? Please review WP:NOTVANDALISM before answering. I'm not sure how anyone is expected to follow what's...

Move protected indefinitely. The Herald (Benison), please observe WP:NOTVANDALISM, you are using the term in error (inappropriately). Thanks. El_C 13:52...

out of the way, will give filelakeshoe the obligatory reminder of WP:NOTVANDALISM (in re this ES). -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 21:07, 7 August...

personal attack, or at the very least an aspersion. Please review WP:NOTVANDALISM. El_C 08:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC) Agreed,pointy removal is disruptive...

good faith is not vandalism or wikihounding. You might want to read WP:NOTVANDALISM. Partofthemachine (talk) 01:38, 18 January 2023 (UTC) @Cushite: I have...

should be done. Good faith edits, even if you disagree with them, is WP:NOTVANDALISM, and it would be inappropriate to call those edits "raiding". You need...

page or other forms of dispute resolution. DennisXD, please observe WP:NOTVANDALISM. Failure to do so counts as personal attack, which is sanctionable. CROIX...

IceWelder, why do you call those edits "vandalism"—have you reviewed WP:NOTVANDALISM? Also, why do you go to the IP/s talk page/s instead of the article talk...

will be automatically unprotected. But Ibdawud, you need to review WP:NOTVANDALISM and observe its ethos. Thanks. El_C 16:57, 24 December 2023 (UTC) 2023...

level warnings for vandalism when they clearly did not vandalise, see WP:NOTVANDAL and you are not supposed to issue a warning that is meant to be final...