DOKUMEN123.COM

Shortcuts WP:IMPERFECTWP:IMPERFECT WP:PERFECTIONWP:PERFECTION WP:NOTPERFECTWP:NOTPERFECT According to the old aphorism, "Perfect is the enemy of good". Hence,...

As such, this article is useless. No, there is no such guideline as WP:NOTPERFECT; why do you ask? Skarmory (talk • contribs) 21:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)...

is WP:NOTTEMPORARY, Wikipedia articles are a work in progress and WP:NOTPERFECT. It's a stub that can be expanded, we don't delete articles about notable...

suitable sources are needed and it's not a final draft. Please see WP:NOTPERFECT Transformium (talk) 14:04, 21 June 2022 (UTC) Is neologism not recognized...

lost many a debate here for doing so, and have to stet sometimes. WP:NOTPERFECT. Si Trew (talk) 23:48, 15 December 2011 (UTC) The above discussion is...

without even trying to find what is wrong with this article", see WP:NOTPERFECT and WP:POINT. This article had a community consensus to promote to FL...

without even trying to find what is wrong with this article", see WP:NOTPERFECT and WP:POINT. This article had a community consensus to promote to FL...

should have been done by then? JguyTalkDone 16:27, 12 June 2013 (UTC) WP:NOTPERFECT. Better to have an article with some problems, than no article at all...

for basic inclusion is much lower than that. See also WP:ARTN and WP:NOTPERFECT. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 02:57, 10 July 2022 (UTC) The article...

--Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:19, 1 January 2017 (UTC) Keep I agree. It's WP:NOTPERFECT. But it's a start. It's clearly a valid list for the category, per WP:NOTDUP...

state media or not. Even if they were incorrectly added, please see WP:NOTPERFECT which talks about how fixing issues is preferable to deletion in many...

2016 (UTC) Yup, it surely must be better than the current target. WP:NOTPERFECT, but better. Si Trew (talk) 23:15, 27 February 2016 (UTC) If you want...

159.127 (talk) 04:44, 7 March 2024 (UTC) Not how Wikipedia works. WP:NOTPERFECT Dream Focus 05:29, 7 March 2024 (UTC) THIS ISN'T A JOKE @Dream Focus....

Dictionaries. Oxford University Press. Retrieved 21 February 2016. It's WP:NOTPERFECT that "black comedy" deals primarily with comic works, rather than black...

outside sources. jps (talk) 21:16, 24 January 2021 (UTC) Please see WP:NOTPERFECT. This page is a work in progress and I'm in the process of adding more...

Football League (disambiguation) and retarget to that, instead. That's WP:NOTPERFECT, but maybe better. Si Trew (talk) 03:52, 28 November 2015 (UTC) Convert...

2016 (UTC) Retarget to Walrus#Reproduction as {{R to section}}. It's WP:NOTPERFECT (sorry Lenticel) but better than nothing (thank you, Lenticel). I could...

untill some paleaontologist decides to edit Wikipedia. WP:NOTFINISHED, WP:NOTPERFECT. It ususally gets a couple of hits a day lately though in march there...

considered as ones you should not make, as it explicitly contradicts the WP:NOTPERFECT policy. Moreover I don't think it's a coincidence that this deletion is...

here, and this is WP:NOTBROKEN. I'm sorry you dislike it, but it's WP:NOTPERFECT. Si Trew (talk) 16:28, 16 March 2015 (UTC) Stats are exactly zero for...

done with admin tools. We do expect admins to behave well though, per WP:NOTPERFECT, and I don't think anyone is suggesting removing the bit. IRWolfie- (talk)...

Don't expect others to do it for you. Also see the policy Wikipedia:NOTPERFECT. Dream Focus 02:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC) +1 -- HighKing++ 12:21, 27 January...

Serious misuse may result in sanction or even their removal." Per WP:NOTPERFECT: "Administrators are expected to lead by example and to behave in a respectful...

02:41, 23 March 2015 (UTC) 'Reply. Maybe it should be, but it isn't. WP:NOTPERFECT, WP:NOTFINISHED, WP:JUSTDOIT. If you want to make the article, go ahead...

(talk) 13:37, 12 December 2016 (UTC) No, I think closing the thread per WP:NOTPERFECT would be easier. (Also, not to nit-pick, but that's actually "consistently...

Wikipedia conform to basic standards. I am very much aware that I am WP:NOTPERFECT and I am also aware that I don't need to be. You have been encouraged...

better, but I'm not seeing the level of disruption you're alleging. WP:NOTPERFECT applies. Buffs (talk) 18:08, 10 October 2019 (UTC) I'm not alleging anything...

a 'success', which means victory in most cases, in any case, check WP:NOTPERFECT. And for the last statement, of course I can't claim being fully unbiased...

entries that didn't meet that requirement. Anyone can remove the rest. WP:NOTPERFECT applies here. Dream Focus 16:29, 24 January 2023 (UTC) Comment: The argument...

of a very large page. LadyofShalott 07:54, 10 November 2009 (UTC) WP:NOTPERFECT WiZeNgAmOtX (talk) 07:56, 10 November 2009 (UTC) Some interesting comments...

Last I checked, the standard of expected behaviors for admins was WP:NOTPERFECT and a "pillar" of this community was WP:NOTBUREAUCRACY "Do not follow...

which I have asked him about. Incidentally, WP:CIR is for editors, WP:NOTPERFECT is the standard for admins. NE Ent 15:57, 21 November 2015 (UTC) This...

wrong). These are a bit unbalanced, then, like improper fractions, but WP:NOTPERFECT and all have a long history. Si Trew (talk) 05:20, 13 September 2015 (UTC)...

User_talk:Miunouta#Arsenal squad template). This seems to have violated WP:NOTPERFECT as "administrators are expected to lead by example and to behave in a...

April 2016 (UTC) Yep, that's better. Retarget per User:Peter James. WP:NOTPERFECT, but better. Si Trew (talk) 13:30, 26 April 2016 (UTC) Retarget to The...

behave in a respectful, civil manner in their interactions with others WP:NOTPERFECT. Does the treat he made should be regarded as respectful and civil ? Harassment"Do...

Wikipedia; all edits can be reversed, fixed or improved later and that WP:NOTPERFECT. I don't see any obstinate restoring material after deletion, and an attempt...

abusive, just that they're being mistaken (which is perfectly okay per WP:NOTPERFECT). This is not to say the material should be in the article, per WP:UNDUE...

[20], there's no evidence De is unfit to be an administrator; see WP:NOTPERFECT). NE Ent 01:33, 29 September 2014 (UTC) Support unblock Just a quick look...

2016 (UTC) Disambiguate per PatarKnight, pace Tavix. While that is WP:NOTPERFECT, I think it's better. I can see that deleting it would give people a better...

we have. It is in the infobox at the right with a reference. It is WP:NOTPERFECT but better than nothing. You are hoist with your own petard by saying...

made the same unfounded claims against me in your WP:AN "Sheldrake". WP:NOTPERFECT: "Administrators are expected to lead by example and to behave in a respectful...

the best solution. As for using the tools, it doesn't matter here. WP:NOTPERFECT states "Administrators are expected to lead by example and to behave in...

source from The Scotsman but the way to get started is to get started. WP:NOTPERFECT, WP:NOTFINISHED. Had a fag break and try to add some more references and...

04:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC) I've added some etymology/genealogy, WP:NOTPERFECT though. Si Trew (talk) 02:14, 12 February 2016 (UTC) The above discussion...

exists. If a tag exists, it will be used. If I were to create the tag {{notperfect}} ("This article is not perfect and could possible be improved") today...

translated the Italian article, so this is no longer a redirect. It's WP:NOTPERFECT, I am not great at Italian, but better than sending people over to IT:WP...

bit WP:SURPRISEing that they are to charts for different things, but WP:NOTPERFECT. Si Trew (talk) 17:16, 28 April 2015 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

I wasn't WP:BOLD and just replaced it, but any other suggestions? WP:NOTPERFECT, WP:NOTFINISHED, but that seems better than what we have currently. (Oh...

Iceland above, were I have elaborated the argument, but essentially WP:NOTPERFECT but better than nothing. Si Trew (talk) 08:10, 27 April 2016 (UTC) Keep...

I agree with User:Uanfala (and thanks for the refs there), this is WP:NOTPERFECT but we'd be worse off without it. Si Trew (talk) 19:57, 23 September 2016...

sense to delete it. I would regard that as a positive outcome. That's WP:NOTPERFECT, by better. That's the last I shall say about it.SiTrew as IP 84.3.187...

Wikipedia would be gone. That's now how we do things here. See: Wikipedia:NOTPERFECT Even the articles that people consider perfect took a long time and many...

things to be done. Ony another seven million redirects to go.... If {{WP:NOTPERFECT|Wikipedia were perfect]], there would be zero redirects. The search engine...

style recommendations. But those key principles do include WP:BOLD and WP:NOTPERFECT. Wikipedia is a self-correcting machine and problems get pointed out and...

DAB pages are there to disambiguate, and the target does that, if WP:NOTPERFECTly: it would be a WP:SURPRISE if "Long" did not mention "length" as well...

is WP:NOTTEMPORARY, Wikipedia articles are a work in progress and WP:NOTPERFECT. It's a stub that can be expanded, we don't delete articles about notable...

section header Cross the Canuck is not mentioned in the section at all. WP:NOTPERFECT pinging User:Ivanvector because although wrong province that user probably...

suitable sources are needed and it's not a final draft. Please see WP:NOTPERFECT Transformium (talk) 14:04, 21 June 2022 (UTC) Is neologism not recognized...

for basic inclusion is much lower than that. See also WP:ARTN and WP:NOTPERFECT. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 02:57, 10 July 2022 (UTC) The article...

Don't expect others to do it for you. Also see the policy Wikipedia:NOTPERFECT. Dream Focus 02:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC) +1 -- HighKing++ 12:21, 27 January...

and to perform their duties to the best of their abilities. (From WP:NOTPERFECT) Comment by Arbitrators: Comment by parties: Laying groundwork Hasteur...

outside sources. jps (talk) 21:16, 24 January 2021 (UTC) Please see WP:NOTPERFECT. This page is a work in progress and I'm in the process of adding more...

2012 (UTC) Admins have to follow the same rules as everyone else. WP:NOTPERFECT RudolfRed (talk) 01:21, 5 July 2012 (UTC) I have checked it out via the...

Wikipedia would be gone. That's now how we do things here. See: Wikipedia:NOTPERFECT Even the articles that people consider perfect took a long time and many...

considered as ones you should not make, as it explicitly contradicts the WP:NOTPERFECT policy. Moreover I don't think it's a coincidence that this deletion is...

should have been done by then? JguyTalkDone 16:27, 12 June 2013 (UTC) WP:NOTPERFECT. Better to have an article with some problems, than no article at all...

--Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:19, 1 January 2017 (UTC) Keep I agree. It's WP:NOTPERFECT. But it's a start. It's clearly a valid list for the category, per WP:NOTDUP...

strive to model appropriate standards of courtesy and civility (see WP:NOTPERFECT), and this is precisely the sort of scenario in which a truly uninvolved...

articles. Even poor articles, if they can be improved, are welcome." WP:NOTPERFECT, emphasis added. Comment by Arbitrators: Comment by parties: Comment by...

him for cleaning that, and you are absolutely right, notfinished and notperfect, but also LEAVE A DECENT EDIT SUMMARY. Which the bot does not do, it just...

As such, this article is useless. No, there is no such guideline as WP:NOTPERFECT; why do you ask? Skarmory (talk • contribs) 21:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)...

ScottyBerg (talk) 16:24, 9 August 2011 (UTC) One suggestion: per WP:NOTPERFECT, I'd recommend that the following language be incorporated in this finding:...

not well, I expect. Remember the standard for our administrators is WP:NOTPERFECT. My own Mattisse GA three-week-long horrorshow is at Talk:Heinrich Himmler/GA2;...

waving their hands and make excused along the line of WP:DEADLINE and WP:NOTPERFECT. As if Wikipedia being eternally unfinished was some sort of excuse for...

example; consider, for example, what we expect of administrators per WP:NOTPERFECT. a) Do you believe that "it takes two to tango" in some circumstances...

example; consider, for example, what we expect of administrators per WP:NOTPERFECT. a) Do you believe that "it takes two to tango" in some circumstances...

They doubled down and are no longer acting in good faith. Using the WP:NOTPERFECT defense for themselves, while insisting on calling me disruptive. It's...

raised a lot of questions. Some will just underline that we are all WP:NOTPERFECT. Others, I believe, raise questions about (1) his judgment and (2) his...

comes with no expectations for better behaviour and I ignore some of WP:NOTPERFECT). As for reading his contribution, I did that the first time and it wore...

entries that didn't meet that requirement. Anyone can remove the rest. WP:NOTPERFECT applies here. Dream Focus 16:29, 24 January 2023 (UTC) Comment: The argument...

apply to each article. AlanStalk 09:24, 10 August 2023 (UTC) Sorry I'm WP:NOTPERFECT.Is the matter resolved now? Kire1975 (talk) 09:30, 10 August 2023 (UTC)...

159.127 (talk) 04:44, 7 March 2024 (UTC) Not how Wikipedia works. WP:NOTPERFECT Dream Focus 05:29, 7 March 2024 (UTC) THIS ISN'T A JOKE @Dream Focus....

WP:NOTOTHERPAGES WP:NOTPART WP:NOTPENAL WP:NOTPEOPLE WP:NOTPEOPLEMAGAZINE WP:NOTPERFECT WP:NOTPERFECTION WP:NOTPERSONNEL WP:NOTPHRASEBOOK WP:NOTPOINT WP:NOTPOINTY...

state media or not. Even if they were incorrectly added, please see WP:NOTPERFECT which talks about how fixing issues is preferable to deletion in many...

for deletion by multiple administrators, when it runs afoul of our WP:NOTPERFECT policy. While this is a redirection with history intact, I maintain that...

coming from. It seems to be in opposition to Wikipedia polices, like WP:NOTPERFECT in WP:EDITING which sourcing isn't even provided in the first two cuts...

common mistake I make so it probably didn't even need pointing out per WP:NOTPERFECT. I don't know too much about the problems with DB's editing but unless...

at the original page proposed by Sennalen and while of course it is WP:NOTPERFECT it is a pretty detailed 60k characters long article that definitely required...

for deletion by multiple administrators, when it runs afoul of our WP:NOTPERFECT policy. While this is a redirection with history intact, I maintain that...