DOKUMEN123.COM

Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia. The amount of information on Wikipedia is practically unlimited, but Wikipedia does not aim to contain all knowledge...

Delete as per WP:NOTJOURNAL TheMesquitobuzz 02:48, 5 June 2015 (UTC) Delete, looks like a term paper or thesis, so delete as OR, NOTJOURNAL. CrowCaw 21:56...

watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats) Scientific paper / essay (WP:NOTJOURNAL) content. Neither the scope of the article nor its content are within...

(UTC) Delete With a plow because WP:NOTJOURNAL. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 02:40, 19 December 2012 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTJOURNAL GregJackP Boomer! 03:01, 19 December...

this still fails WP:NOTJOURNAL, particularly points #7 and #8. SpinningSpark 23:59, 18 November 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTJOURNAL. Much to technical...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) per WP:NOTJOURNAL, this appears to be written like a textbook or scientific journal - more...

there are guidelines on how technical article should be written per WP:NOTJOURNAL, it is about how a technical article should be presented, not whether...

"JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:09, 29 November 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTESSAY/WP:NOTJOURNAL. The topic of using social media to track/predict mental illness could...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTJOURNAL. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 04:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is...

headers) and wikilinking terms I didn't understand. You may want to read WP:NOTJOURNAL (especially #7), and do a bit of explaining at the beginning of the article...

wikipedia is WP:NOTJOURNAL and WP:NOTTEXTBOOK. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 02:44, 6 December 2025 (UTC) Delete failing both WP:NOTJOURNAL, WP:NOTTEXTBOOK and...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTJOURNAL, WP:NOTESSAY, or some other category on WP:NOT. PROD removed by article...

notability. clpo13(talk) 01:55, 27 October 2015 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:NOTJOURNAL MarnetteD|Talk 02:32, 27 October 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTJOURNAL, WP:NOTESSAY. This looks like a journal article or a thesis paper that...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Declined PROD; WP:NOTJOURNAL and not much else. §FreeRangeFrog 20:15, 29 November 2012 (UTC) Delete...

journals. Therefore, this article should be deleted per WP:NOTESSAY or WP:NOTJOURNAL. Zzyzx11 (talk) 06:30, 27 February 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

January 2013 (UTC) Delete. Article reads like a OR research paper (see WP:NOTJOURNAL), and the topic is unlikely to generate an encyclopedic article. — daranz...

CoolSkittle (talk) 05:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC) Can we do that for these WP:NOTJOURNAL articles? I have a bunch of these that I've had to reject, see...

or maybe students who have other avenues to sort these out (i.e., WP:NOTJOURNAL) Kingofaces43 (talk) 14:54, 22 June 2020 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOTLINKFARM...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promotional/book review. May also fail WP:NOTJOURNAL. Notability not established. Ahecht (TALK PAGE) 21:25, 4 April 2014 (UTC)...

engineering thesis paper but is probably too specific and technical for WP. WP:NOTJOURNAL shoy (reactions) 20:38, 24 September 2015 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...

allowed by the core policy Wikipedia:No original research. WP:NOTESSAY, WP:NOTJOURNAL. Advise Epic Love to read the advice at Wikipedia:Alternative outlets...

Eppstein (talk) 05:03, 11 January 2015 (UTC) Delete, no merge, per WP:NOTJOURNAL. I am amazed it took so long. This is a technical calculation with no...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTJOURNAL / WP:NOTTEXTBOOK Ecourter (talk) 07:03, 13 December 2025 (UTC) Note: This...

left a comment on the draft, pointing to WP:FORUM or WP:NOTHOWTO, and WP:NOTJOURNAL. Your draft is not about an encyclopedic subject; it's a how-to and it...

WP:NOT criteria to delete it based on, I volunteer WP:ORIGINALITY and WP:NOTJOURNAL. JustARandomSquid (talk) 08:25, 14 January 2026 (UTC) Delete – Fails in...

(UTC) Delete Non-notable flash in the pan. Fails both WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTJOURNAL. --TorriTorri(talk/contribs) 06:48, 19 June 2014 (UTC) Comment Torritorri...

immediately about the topic and its conclusions (WP:PRIMARY, WP:SYNTH, WP:NOTJOURNAL). The second is that such secondary sources appear to be lacking, meaning...

(see WP:PRIMARY). But the article will need an introduction, as per WP:NOTJOURNAL. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 13:33, 26 July 2013 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...

July 2016 (UTC) Merge to Swarm intelligence#Algorithms mainly per WP:NOTJOURNAL. In order for a concept to be notable, we cannot be relying on just the...

of the website, but regardless of that, this fails WP:NOTDIR and/or WP:NOTJOURNAL. §FreeRangeFrog 20:05, 8 December 2012 (UTC) Speedy Delete. Little to...

compiled here in Wikipedia, and this is not what we do here. So this is a WP:NOTJOURNAL and WP:OR thing. Maybe has a place in Wikidata. Jytdog (talk) 04:44, 17...

worth merging much less a standalone article per WP:NOTMANUAL and WP:NOTJOURNAL. Kingofaces43 (talk) 05:04, 31 July 2016 (UTC) Keep The nomination talks...

beautiful. Equally, the rationales for deletion (WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:NOTJOURNAL) are daft). First off, this is/was far from an indiscriminate list (whilst...

by SpaceInnovader. The next alternate grounds for deletion would be WP:NOTJOURNAL. It's a little science-heavy, but I have no knowledge of the field and...

should be deleted like this one. Wikipedia is WP:NOTEVERYTHING and WP:NOTJOURNAL. The information in this article is highly specialized and not likely...

belong in an encyclopedia. Most crucially that WP:NOTDIRECTORY#6,7 WP:NOTJOURNAL#9 and WP:PRESSRELEASEWP:SOAP. It may be possible that Neurofeminism and...

America1000 06:21, 2 August 2016 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NOTFORUM and WP:NOTJOURNAL, as this article appears to have material that teaches more subject manner...

present in the article such as it's not just a WP:REFBOMB. The policy of WP:NOTJOURNAL and WP:NOTTEXTBOOK apply here. Revolving Doormat (talk) 15:02, 18 December...

practice violates a host of Wikipedia policies, such as WP:NOTESSAY, WP:NOTJOURNAL, WP:OR, and so on. Yet, such texts are the most difficult to exterminate...

page into something that would be well-sourced but would run into WP:NOTJOURNAL or WP:NOTTEXTBOOK and I think other voters should keep that in mind when...

robustness or reproducibility. The article as is clearly violates WP:NOTJOURNAL. There is more information here than the textbooks covering the technique...

August 2023 (UTC) I think what you are describing is WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTJOURNAL. Posting debunkings of pseudoscience with WP:SYNTH goes against either...

when Miller uses this language he is using scholarly shorthand. Per WP:NOTJOURNAL we are not supposed to use academic shorthand that will be misunderstood...

newspapers because of WP:NOTNEWS, nor any scientific journals because of WP:NOTJOURNAL, nor any textbooks because of WP:NOTTEXTBOOK, and so on. So it is quite...

17:44, 30 November 2016 (UTC) Delete. I'm calling WP:SYNTHESIS and WP:NOTJOURNAL. --HyperGaruda (talk) 05:35, 25 November 2016 (UTC) Comment: the reason...

of original thought (links to redirect • history • stats) Wikipedia:NOTJOURNALISM → Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a publisher of original...

class. That said, I support trimming undue experimental detail per WP:NOTJOURNAL and adding more independent secondary sources. COI concerns can be handled...

troublesome edits are often not encyclopedic edits. In that case, WP:NOTJOURNAL was sufficient to remove the overly detailed (and helpful to would-be...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) per WP:NOTJOURNAL, this appears to be written like a textbook or scientific journal - more...

Delete as per WP:NOTJOURNAL TheMesquitobuzz 02:48, 5 June 2015 (UTC) Delete, looks like a term paper or thesis, so delete as OR, NOTJOURNAL. CrowCaw 21:56...

there are guidelines on how technical article should be written per WP:NOTJOURNAL, it is about how a technical article should be presented, not whether...

But in my view a Featured Article should not be overly complex (see WP:NOTJOURNAL, so do consider removing unnecessary technical terms whenever possible...

belong in an encyclopedia. Most crucially that WP:NOTDIRECTORY#6,7 WP:NOTJOURNAL#9 and WP:PRESSRELEASEWP:SOAP. It may be possible that Neurofeminism and...

approach to fraud, however. Alexbrn (talk) 16:31, 10 November 2021 (UTC) WP:NOTJOURNAL seems relevant here: WP is not for the type of original research that...

if it's ideal or enough. —PaleoNeonate – 08:29, 22 July 2019 (UTC) WP:NOTJOURNAL/WP:NOTPAPERS would often be a start, and to a lesser extend WP:NOR/WP:SYNTH...

self-censorship of the journalistic community in the US. N.B: Linking to WP:NOTJOURNALISM will not make this go away. Creative commons content is in the public...

"JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:09, 29 November 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTESSAY/WP:NOTJOURNAL. The topic of using social media to track/predict mental illness could...

this still fails WP:NOTJOURNAL, particularly points #7 and #8. SpinningSpark 23:59, 18 November 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTJOURNAL. Much to technical...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTJOURNAL, WP:NOTESSAY, or some other category on WP:NOT. PROD removed by article...

notability. clpo13(talk) 01:55, 27 October 2015 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:NOTJOURNAL MarnetteD|Talk 02:32, 27 October 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

are not an adequate substitution for the actual art. For example, WP:NOTJOURNAL] says, "articles should be written on the assumption that the reader will...

journals. Therefore, this article should be deleted per WP:NOTESSAY or WP:NOTJOURNAL. Zzyzx11 (talk) 06:30, 27 February 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

immediately about the topic and its conclusions (WP:PRIMARY, WP:SYNTH, WP:NOTJOURNAL). The second is that such secondary sources appear to be lacking, meaning...

worth merging much less a standalone article per WP:NOTMANUAL and WP:NOTJOURNAL. Kingofaces43 (talk) 05:04, 31 July 2016 (UTC) Keep The nomination talks...

(UTC) Delete With a plow because WP:NOTJOURNAL. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 02:40, 19 December 2012 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTJOURNAL GregJackP Boomer! 03:01, 19 December...

beautiful. Equally, the rationales for deletion (WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:NOTJOURNAL) are daft). First off, this is/was far from an indiscriminate list (whilst...

America1000 06:21, 2 August 2016 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NOTFORUM and WP:NOTJOURNAL, as this article appears to have material that teaches more subject manner...

July 2016 (UTC) Merge to Swarm intelligence#Algorithms mainly per WP:NOTJOURNAL. In order for a concept to be notable, we cannot be relying on just the...

practice violates a host of Wikipedia policies, such as WP:NOTESSAY, WP:NOTJOURNAL, WP:OR, and so on. Yet, such texts are the most difficult to exterminate...

(UTC) Delete Non-notable flash in the pan. Fails both WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTJOURNAL. --TorriTorri(talk/contribs) 06:48, 19 June 2014 (UTC) Comment Torritorri...

Eppstein (talk) 05:03, 11 January 2015 (UTC) Delete, no merge, per WP:NOTJOURNAL. I am amazed it took so long. This is a technical calculation with no...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTJOURNAL, WP:NOTESSAY. This looks like a journal article or a thesis paper that...

by SpaceInnovader. The next alternate grounds for deletion would be WP:NOTJOURNAL. It's a little science-heavy, but I have no knowledge of the field and...

engineering thesis paper but is probably too specific and technical for WP. WP:NOTJOURNAL shoy (reactions) 20:38, 24 September 2015 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...

compiled here in Wikipedia, and this is not what we do here. So this is a WP:NOTJOURNAL and WP:OR thing. Maybe has a place in Wikidata. Jytdog (talk) 04:44, 17...

newspapers because of WP:NOTNEWS, nor any scientific journals because of WP:NOTJOURNAL, nor any textbooks because of WP:NOTTEXTBOOK, and so on. So it is quite...

or maybe students who have other avenues to sort these out (i.e., WP:NOTJOURNAL) Kingofaces43 (talk) 14:54, 22 June 2020 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOTLINKFARM...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Declined PROD; WP:NOTJOURNAL and not much else. §FreeRangeFrog 20:15, 29 November 2012 (UTC) Delete...

of the website, but regardless of that, this fails WP:NOTDIR and/or WP:NOTJOURNAL. §FreeRangeFrog 20:05, 8 December 2012 (UTC) Speedy Delete. Little to...

17:44, 30 November 2016 (UTC) Delete. I'm calling WP:SYNTHESIS and WP:NOTJOURNAL. --HyperGaruda (talk) 05:35, 25 November 2016 (UTC) Comment: the reason...

(see WP:PRIMARY). But the article will need an introduction, as per WP:NOTJOURNAL. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 13:33, 26 July 2013 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...

January 2013 (UTC) Delete. Article reads like a OR research paper (see WP:NOTJOURNAL), and the topic is unlikely to generate an encyclopedic article. — daranz...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTJOURNAL. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 04:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promotional/book review. May also fail WP:NOTJOURNAL. Notability not established. Ahecht (TALK PAGE) 21:25, 4 April 2014 (UTC)...

be much more suited to a scientific journal than to Wikipedia; see WP:NOTJOURNAL. --David Biddulph (talk) 16:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC) Thanks David. I...

full well that its not reliable, trustworthy, or independent. Per WP:NOTJOURNAL we cant assume that the general reader knows that Mainland Chinese sources...

watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats) Scientific paper / essay (WP:NOTJOURNAL) content. Neither the scope of the article nor its content are within...

WP:SYNTH.--ukexpat (talk) 20:25, 19 September 2013 (UTC) According to WP:NOTJOURNAL, we shouldn't host academic papers or journals, and should not include...

cromulent with WP:Policy.--Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 00:49, 6 March 2019 (UTC) WP:NOTJOURNAL sums up well why I object to the use of the word "conjecture." HappyWanderer15...

unconfirmed primary research on compounds with vaguely-presumed bioactivity, WP:NOTJOURNAL #7-9. Zefr (talk) 18:45, 2 September 2022 (UTC) I do not know what "official...

But in my view a Featured Article should not be overly complex (see WP:NOTJOURNAL, so do consider removing unnecessary technical terms whenever possible...

explain what the article is about to a lay person. MOS:JARGON and WP:NOTJOURNAL would therefore seem to be applicable. --John B123 (talk) 22:56, 24 July...

published in journals does not always qualify for an encyclopedia, WP:NOTJOURNAL. --Zefr (talk) 18:16, 5 May 2018 (UTC) It says, "Summary of dispute by...

October 2023 (UTC) There are plenty of guidelines such as WP:NOTJARGON, WP:NOTJOURNAL and MOS:LEAD. The challenge is getting them followed. There are also plenty...

bold edit here, which removed broad swaths of content that violated WP:NOTJOURNAL and WP:NOTESSAY. If you look at the diff, you will notice that I removed...

Wikipedia is neither a forum for discussion (WP:NOTFORUM) nor a Journal (WP:NOTJOURNAL) where original ideas are meant to be discussed and then presented as...

headers) and wikilinking terms I didn't understand. You may want to read WP:NOTJOURNAL (especially #7), and do a bit of explaining at the beginning of the article...

wikipedia is WP:NOTJOURNAL and WP:NOTTEXTBOOK. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 02:44, 6 December 2025 (UTC) Delete failing both WP:NOTJOURNAL, WP:NOTTEXTBOOK and...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTJOURNAL / WP:NOTTEXTBOOK Ecourter (talk) 07:03, 13 December 2025 (UTC) Note: This...

page into something that would be well-sourced but would run into WP:NOTJOURNAL or WP:NOTTEXTBOOK and I think other voters should keep that in mind when...

WP:NOT criteria to delete it based on, I volunteer WP:ORIGINALITY and WP:NOTJOURNAL. JustARandomSquid (talk) 08:25, 14 January 2026 (UTC) Delete – Fails in...

present in the article such as it's not just a WP:REFBOMB. The policy of WP:NOTJOURNAL and WP:NOTTEXTBOOK apply here. Revolving Doormat (talk) 15:02, 18 December...

robustness or reproducibility. The article as is clearly violates WP:NOTJOURNAL. There is more information here than the textbooks covering the technique...

should be deleted like this one. Wikipedia is WP:NOTEVERYTHING and WP:NOTJOURNAL. The information in this article is highly specialized and not likely...

WP:PAG have us being behind the ball on new information like that. WP:NOTJOURNAL policy comes into play here too where an encyclopedia is not where we...

class. That said, I support trimming undue experimental detail per WP:NOTJOURNAL and adding more independent secondary sources. COI concerns can be handled...

by so many of academic protocols. Moxy🍁 01:31, 15 July 2024 (UTC) WP:NOTJOURNAL says different ("Article titles should reflect common usage, not academic...