DOKUMEN123.COM

This notability guideline for film-related articles helps decide whether a film-related topic should have its own article, and builds on the general notability...

comments regarding WP:NOTFILM don't hold water. Neither being shot on 35mm film nor having a theatrical release is listed as a NOTFILM criterion (and neither...

WP:NOTFILM. The article was created by the film's director. Jim Heaphy (talk) 05:43, 5 March 2010 (UTC) Delete Fails notability under WP:NOTFILM. Mootros...

WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 16:33, 1 August 2018 (UTC) Comment - the fact that it was screened at a film festival makes it notable. And per WP:NOTFILM,...

of substance and I can find no significant coverage elsewhere. Fails WP:NOTFILM. PC78 (talk) 16:56, 18 April 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Not notable per WP:NOTFILM. No Independent reliable source prove its notability. The director was...

fails WP:NOTFILM. In the news search above, I looked at about half of the hits and they were all excluded as sources of notability under WP:NOTFILM. Mostly...

guidelines in WP:NOTFILM. It's great that the blog has been visited 130,000 times but that does not do anything to meet the requirements of WP:NOTFILM. In addition...

read WP:NOTFILM more carefully. No reviews that I can find; none in Rotten Tomatoes. Clarityfiend 14:53, 18 July 2007 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTFILM - imdb doesn't...

per nom & WP:NOTFILM. --Evb-wiki 04:23, 19 June 2007 (UTC) Delete per Evb-wiki --Justanother 04:25, 19 June 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTFILM. I can't find...

GreyWyvern⚒ 17:46, 12 November 2009 (UTC) Delete - Non-notable film (see WP:NOTFILM) -- Scjessey (talk) 20:12, 12 November 2009 (UTC) Delete: I found zero...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of passing WP:NOTFILM EuroPride (talk) 15:32, 24 April 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

director.) Girolamo Savonarola 06:10, 22 August 2007 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NOTFILM. An IMDb listing does not necessarily establish notability. I also checked...

Non-notable film. Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 02:46, 5 May 2017 (UTC) Speedy Delete as advertising and self-promotion. Fails WP:NOTFILM Melcous (talk) 09:03...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. It is claimed that it is a "collector's item" however this is unsourced...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of passing WP:NOTFILM. EuroPride (talk) 10:09, 24 April 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTFILM reddogsix (talk) 21:18, 2 March 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 23:09, 16 December 2009 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NOTFILM at present though I confidently predict...

Non-notable film lacking Ghits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 17:05, 13 February 2011 (UTC) Delete, no notability asserted...

website. As a screenplay, it doesn't satisfy the questions presented in WP:NOTFILM (it seems to have interest from producers but hasn't reached pre-production)...

delete. No sources to verify claims of "award-winning", fails WP:BIO and WP:NOTFILM. KrakatoaKatie 16:03, 4 September 2007 (UTC) Andi Reiss (edit | talk |...

lacking GHits and GNEWS. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM ttonyb (talk) 04:23, 21 March 2010 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NOTFILM and WP:COI. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew...

GNEWS for the combined target "film and the director". Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM ttonyb1 (talk) 22:50, 16 August 2009 (UTC) Delete does not seem notable...

watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Non-notable film. Fails WP:NOTFILM. No GHITS of substance or any GNEWS. ttonyb1 (talk) 22:43, 5 July 2009...

September 2006 (UTC) Apparently some sort of anime music video. Fails WP:NOTFILM miserably. NeoChaosX [talk | contribs] 07:43, 5 September 2006 (UTC) Delete...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of passing WP:NOTFILM. EuroPride (talk) 15:34, 24 April 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film. Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 13:54, 16 May 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

Non-notable short film lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 20:11, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Keep - Initially To Inflict...

short film that fails WP:NOTFILM and GNG. --Non-Dropframe talk 23:40, 21 May 2015 (UTC) Delete - Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 10:06, 22...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM - The non-dead link provided does not really seem to assert the notability...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of passing WP:NOTFILM. EuroPride (talk) 15:33, 24 April 2010 (UTC) The film is mentioned in [1]...

a prod tag. Ogdred 21:15, 10 September 2006 (UTC) Sorry -- just saw WP:NOTFILM. The creator, User:WhiteyWhite, claims to have shot the jpegs of the actors...

Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM ttonyb (talk) 22:39, 12 November 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM, as principal has not yet started. Article starter removed PROD and replaced...

they're all relevant with that many search terms). In short: fails WP:NOTFILM and WP:RS. Included in nomination: Night of the Day of the Dawn of the...

nominator is suggesting that the film fails WP:NOTFILM, that is a moot point because GNG trumps NOTFILM every day of the week. Properly sourced and notable...

TWL) Contested PROD. The PROD rationale, with which I agree, was Fails WP:NOTFILM. I can't find any independent reliable sources indicating that the notability...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOTFILM, this film is not widely distributed, has no notable awards or coverage...

log) Non-notable film. No substantial GHits and no GNEWS hits. Fails WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb1 (talk) 17:23, 4 July 2009 (UTC) Delete I can't find anything proving...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTFILM. Also, WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:21,...

film lacking references to support its notability. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 01:18, 8 February 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film. Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 22:44, 30 September 2017 (UTC) Delete. The article claims...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NOTFILM. Other than an IMDB entry and one press release (in Norwegian) announced...

notability. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 12:02, 2 June 2011 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTFILM. According to the IMDb, this film is still in development. Future films...

Guy 13:36, 22 September 2006 (UTC) Delete. Does not meet criteria for WP:NOTFILM. All of the actors mentioned are redlinked, as well as the production company...

Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 21:21, 31 July 2010 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NOTFILM, and has no coverage shown in reliable independent sources. The Pink Grand...

Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. The talk page has indicated the article is about a trilogy and not about a single film and therefore the WP:NOTFILM may not apply...

Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 07:59, 26 February 2010 (UTC) Delete: I cna't find significant...

Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 22:42, 26 February 2010 (UTC) Delete: The only sources for...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fairly generic series of porn films which fail WP:NOTFILM individually and collectively, with no indication that the GNG or any other...

WP:NOTFILM). If nothing else, it's simply WP:TOOSOON. --Non-Dropframe talk 23:23, 10 June 2015 (UTC) Delete: Fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NOTFILM. BU...

point. Sjakkalle (Check!) 20:22, 9 December 2011 (UTC) Delete - Per WP:NOTFILM, "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't need an article, certainly seems to fail WP:NOTFILM. Suggest merger with Rush (band) at the very least. magnius (talk) 21:50...

logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Film with no evidence of notability (WP:NOTFILM) provided or found. PROD removed by original editor, adding evidence of...

speedy-deletion. Note that its pure existance doesn't fulfill any criteria of WP:NOTFILM. No reviews, no awards, no wide distribution, no major breaktrough in any...

Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 21:18, 31 July 2010 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NOTFILM, and has no coverage shown in reliable independent sources. The Pink Grand...

them. Firestorm Talk 02:14, 28 July 2009 (UTC) Delete: That would be WP:NOTFILM, and I concur.  RGTraynor  03:32, 28 July 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate...

after such sources that verify WP:NOTFILM are found.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 23:15, 14 March 2008 (UTC) delete - WP:NOTFILM sounds a lot like WP:MUSIC - something...

film genre. Dekkappai (talk) 03:44, 2 August 2010 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NOTFILM, and has no coverage shown in reliable independent sources. The Pink Grand...

links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Delete nn film, fails WP:NOTFILM Mayalld (talk) 07:51, 7 January 2009 (UTC) How do you figure that? Did...

October 2009 (UTC) What are you talking about? BTW, the criteria at WP:NOTFILM would specifically exclude the NYT reference as coverage: "Trivial coverage...

2010 (UTC) Delete Lacking any significant coverage is nowhere near WP:NOTFILM. Lame Name (talk) 04:25, 26 May 2010 (UTC) Solid Keep of the now expanded...

2007 (UTC) Delete Only sources are official website and IMDb, fails WP:NOTFILM. Jay32183 22:35, 19 September 2007 (UTC) Keep - I've added two reviews...

delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) fails WP:NOTFILM, only source does not mention this film For An Angel (talk) 20:36, 4 June...

deletion/The Man Who Killed Hitler And Then The Bigfoot). Fails WP:V and WP:NOTFILM. -- Scientizzle 19:31, 19 October 2006 (UTC) Delete, though your comparison...

significant coverage in reliable sources. Also, it does not seem to satisfy WP:NOTFILM#Other evidence of notability. I have no opinion. Hut 8.5 13:16, 22 January...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 21:30, 15 November 2009 (UTC) Delete: I found zero sources...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:27, 7 November 2016 (UTC)...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Declined speedy nominee. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:25, 6 December 2009 (UTC) Delete unnotable film spammed...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM as production has not yet begun, already addressed at Sherlock_Holmes_(2009_film)...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Nominating for deletion as per WP:NOTFILM. The movie hasn't started shooting (indicated by its lack of significant...

WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 03:45, 11 December 2011 (UTC) Comment — This is a very tough call. To start with, I'm not so sure this fails WP:NOTFILM. There...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 06:34, 13 February 2014 (UTC) The above discussion is...

the circumstances, I am nominating this article for deletion under WP:NOTFILM, WP:NOR and WP:COI. Trusilver 01:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC) Also... although...

film project lacking GHIts and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM ttonyb (talk) 22:42, 30 July 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

no end. ~Matticus TC 10:57, 2 November 2006 (UTC) Keep This passes WP:NOTFILM. It was released theatrically as a "double bill" with Honey, I Shrunk the...

(delete) – (View log) Non-notable short film. Lacks references and fails WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb1 (talk) 20:58, 9 June 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Clearly fails WP:NOTFILM among other policies. Film hasn't been announced and only in talks. EelamStyleZ...

Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 15:56, 21 December 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

March 2016 (UTC) Delete - I don't see evidence that this film meets WP:NOTFILM, unless more reliable sources can be provided. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:49...

logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Non-notable film. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. Limited GHits and no GNEWS. ttonyb1 (talk) 01:05, 24 July 2009 (UTC) Note:...

about an unreleased animated comedy. No evidence of notability per WP:NOTFILM or even WP:GNG. andy (talk) 10:27, 22 February 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film lacking ghit and Gnews of substance. Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 22:22, 2 February 2013 (UTC) Delete I was unable to find...

(UTC) Delete not assertion that it meets the suggestions of the essay WP:NOTFILM Eluchil404 23:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM as production has not yet begun. PROD was disputed. Fbifriday (talk) 06:49...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable, and apparently non-existing movie, fails WP:NOTFILM. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:54, 2 January 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

TWL) It is too early for this article to be created and clearly fails WP:NOTFILM. The creator also clearly made this page with an incorrect title as the...

starring Michael Gross as Burt Gummer it should be notable enough per WP:NOTFILM. Raitchison (talk) 22:20, 4 December 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

2006 (UTC) Delete. One of the least notable subjects I've seen; fails WP:NOTFILM and has no independent verifiable sources. --Wine Guy Talk 22:53, 27 July...

WP:FILM. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:43, 9 December 2011 (UTC) Delete - Per WP:NOTFILM, "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced...

Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWs of substance. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 14:36, 19 August 2010 (UTC) According to the guidelines...

01:23, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. Notability not established, fails WP:NOTFILM. WWGB (talk) 01:31, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom.-Unpopular Opinion (talk ·...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Fails WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 04:44, 26 February 2011 (UTC) Delete Clearly a non-notable...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Film not yet in principal photography, per WP:NOTFILM. GoldenRing (talk) 06:26, 16 March 2015 (UTC) Principal photography has...

project lacking GHits of substance and zero GNEWS. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 00:16, 26 October 2009 (UTC) Delete. Nothing notable here...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film. Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 15:01, 15 November 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film not yet filming. Fails WP:NOTFILM. PROD removed by article creator. ttonyb (talk) 03:09, 13 May 2011 (UTC)...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM ttonyb (talk) 15:10, 24 March 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

article are in Russian and I have no Russian skills. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 18:55, 27 November 2011 (UTC) Keep Significant coverage...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM ttonyb (talk) 16:35, 22 September 2009 (UTC) Delete per nom.  B.Rossow talkcontr...

of questionable notability, lacking GHits and GNEWS. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM TheRealFennShysa (talk) 15:39, 22 March 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

there's nothing about it after its release (over a year ago). Fails WP:NOTFILM. Yintan  18:16, 9 October 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

discussions. —Nick-D (talk) 00:48, 29 March 2009 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NOTFILM. WWGB (talk) 01:25, 29 March 2009 (UTC) Delete: no significant coverage...

film lacking GHits of substance and with zero GNEWS. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM ttonyb (talk) 16:55, 5 March 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM. Most of the 'references' are either to user generated sites, or to sites...

notable? --Ericn9 (talk) 20:57, 21 February 2011 (UTC) I think that WP:NOTFILM would be helpful to read. ceranthor 21:01, 21 February 2011 (UTC) Yes,...

notability claims, and doesn't appear to stand up to notability criteria of WP:NOTFILM. Most of the films' web presence is on Youtube, which doesn't even appear...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM, unable to find any sources discussing the topic outside a brief mention...

The result was delete. judging consensus against guidelines I note that NOTFILM cites being screened in a festival 5 years after release is evidence of...

Everard Proudfoot (talk) 23:14, 12 September 2010 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NOTFILM; lots of reviews, but all basically from blogs. PhGustaf (talk) 23:32,...

September 2008 (UTC) Delete. Does not meet any of the guidlines of WP:NOTFILM or otherwise demonstrate notability. A quick google search does not find...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film lacking non-trivial support. Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 01:52, 21 December 2015 (UTC) Delete - Subject lacks...

contribs) 15:36, 17 November 2008 (UTC) Please see the criteria listed at WP:NOTFILM. This may help to explain why this article has been listed for deletion...

Delete – Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Fails WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 22:43, 10 April 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:42, 11 April 2009 (UTC) Comment Please refer to WP:NOTFILM for the guidelines of notability for films. The salient prerequisite here...

all red links. Cunard (talk) 20:08, 12 June 2009 (UTC) Delete- Fails WP:NOTFILM. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ttonyb1 (talk • contribs) G3 as...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWs of substance. Fails WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 04:27, 29 May 2011 (UTC) Weak Keep - This made for TV documentary...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTFILM. Apart from standard releases there is no appropriate coverage to indicate...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete per WP:NOTFILM(no historical notability, coverage, commercial re-release, awards)....

yet. While future films may qualify as notable before release under WP:NOTFILM, the only source cited in this article has insufficient information to...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film. Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 01:37, 25 July 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

also the writer and director of this "short film". It blatantly fails WP:NOTFILM and the only source available is a facebook page that reads, "The Silent...

(UTC) Delete – Lacks GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 17:19, 4 July 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

TWL) Non-notable film lacking non-trivial support. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 16:08, 31 July 2014 (UTC) Delete per nom. JayJayWhat...

in multiple WP:RS indicating that this in fact a work that satisfies WP:NOTFILM. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:20, 20 March 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM, not yet shooting. Lacks support. reddogsix (talk) 02:55, 5 January 2015...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM Darkness Shines (talk) 10:39, 31 December 2012 (UTC) Delete - per nom....

Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM ttonyb (talk) 18:08, 11 November 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

placed. Only improvement was addition of one non-reliable source. Fails WP:NOTFILM. Cresix (talk) 02:14, 19 July 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Fails WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 14:32, 5 May 2011 (UTC) Delete - nn film from a promotional...

multiple reliable secondary sources independent of the topic, fails WP:NOTFILM. Jay32183 20:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

unreleased, low budget film, lacks 3rd party references, non notable. Fails WP:NOTFILM Rtphokie (talk) 02:35, 8 March 2009 (UTC) Delete: non-notable film hasn't...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject does not meet notability criteria at WP:NOTFILM. Krychek (talk) 17:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC) Please also note that the...

Wikipedia ? Anish Viswa 07:52, 2 December 2011 (UTC) Delete According to WP:NOTFILM: "Films produced in the past, which were either not completed or not distributed...

GNEWS of substance. Article Prod was removed by author> Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 01:07, 24 September 2010 (UTC) Delete as article fails notability...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film lacking GHit and GNEWS of substance. Fails WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 05:49, 26 April 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

film lacking any GNEWS hits and without any GHits of substance. Fails WP:NOTFILM ttonyb1 (talk) 17:57, 30 August 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

a straight to YouTube short film that doesn't come close to meeting WP:NOTFILM. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:18, 2 November 2016 (UTC)...

(talk) 17:39, 26 April 2014 (UTC) Delete - Non-notable film. Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 17:51, 26 April 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Film not yet in principal photography, per WP:NOTFILM. GoldenRing (talk) 06:28, 16 March 2015 (UTC) Do not delete. Who told you...

and I don't see any significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:NOTFILM. PC78 (talk) 22:37, 29 March 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

claimed award is not a "major" award for "excellence" as required by WP:NOTFILM. This is just a collection of castlists, not an encyclopedic article. Hullaballoo...

- added to nomination by Shalom Hello No evidence of notability per WP:NOTFILM. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The saints and the sinners. Kevin...

incorrectly interpreting WP:NOTFILM. Your claim that all films must ALSO pass GNG makes WP:NOTFILM entirely useless. WP:NOTFILM should just be a redirect...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Film does not appear to pass WP:NOTFILM. It was a small indie film that was never in wide release. The article...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet the WP:NOTFILM criteria. One article source only mentions it in passing. Can't find reliable...

JSTOR · TWL) Fails the notability criteria for films documented at WP:NOTFILM. Additionally, the only sources are the official website and IMDB. Noformation...

Obvious to who? Zetawoof(ζ) 11:11, 26 April 2009 (UTC) Speedy Keep Passes WP:NOTFILM, as it is an episode of a major Television series; Nominator seems to have...

TWL) Vanity page for self-created movie. Lack notability and fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 02:39, 27 September 2015 (UTC) Delete There is also a...

about, even if this film does not exist, and even if it never exists. WP:NOTFILM states that "if such an unreleased film can meet the criteria in our basic...

14 October 2009 (UTC) Delete Does not meet notability guidelines at WP:NOTFILM. The only sources are from IMDb, and I can't locate any coverage that shows...

Delete - Non-notable film lacking in-depth, non-trivial sources. Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 16:16, 4 July 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film. Article created by director. Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 16:42, 12 June 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Non-notable film. Fails WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb1 (talk) 05:34, 3 August 2009 (UTC) Delete: It's a film made as...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. Prod removed by author. ttonyb (talk) 00:13, 28 September 2009 (UTC) Delete:...

info. Brianyoumans (talk) 14:47, 16 April 2010 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NOTFILM, WP:V. Possible hoax. — Rankiri (talk) 17:49, 16 April 2010 (UTC) Note:...

JSTOR · TWL) A cancelled film with no citations, fails WP:N. WP:V, WP:NOTFILM, and WP:FUTFILM. Google shows nothing since 2005 regarding pre-production...

watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Delete non-notable film per WP:NOTFILM Mayalld (talk) 19:25, 31 August 2008 (UTC) Comment - Ghits for "Pardonnez-moi"...

(talk) 15:29, 20 June 2009 (UTC) Unimportant local film that fails WP:NOTFILM. I have not been able to find any reviews of the film, nor have I seen...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 05:49, 13 November 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 16:24, 21 November 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

establish notability. Whpq (talk) 17:54, 8 May 2009 (UTC) Delete- Fails WP:NOTFILM ttonyb1 (talk) 18:01, 8 May 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. Not yet filming. reddogsix (talk) 10:18, 7 November 2014 (UTC) Note: This...

it on the IMDb. Nothing that suggests it meets the WP:N, WP:NFF or WP:NOTFILM guidelines. BelovedFreak 09:59, 12 March 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film. Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 01:43, 27 November 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 03:09, 22 January 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Student film is not notable, fails WP:NOTFILM and criteria as per WP:GNG Flat Out let's discuss it 11:37, 21 August 2013...

August 2009 (UTC) Delete and possibly redirect to The Thieves of Ostia. WP:NOTFILM, WP:V. The article virtually asserts that its subject is not notable or...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) per WP:NOTFILM Ushau97 talk contribs 09:20, 4 February 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film lacking non-trivial resources. Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 23:44, 31 October 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

project lacking GHits of substance and zero GNEWS. Appears to fail WP:WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 13:59, 25 October 2009 (UTC) Delete: per nom - making a...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTFILM. Prod removed by author. reddogsix (talk) 17:35, 18 March 2016 (UTC) Speedy...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:NOTFILM. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oo7565 (talk • contribs) Note: This...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Once again, fails WP:NOTFILM, as the principle photography has not yet begun. Fbifriday (talk) 08:54...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NOTFILM.  —Josh3580talk/hist 04:39, 27 January 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM and WP:CRYSTAL. ttonyb (talk) 23:09, 20 May 2010 (UTC) Delete per nom....

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Filming has not started. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM ttonyb (talk) 05:37, 3 July 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) no indication of passing WP:NOTFILM Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:00, 1 November 2017 (UTC)...

JSTOR · TWL) The references appear to be WP:ROUTINE and the film to fails WP:NOTFILM and WP:GNG. 12:52, 27 May 2013‎ Tanbircdq Comment Tanbircdq I have signed...

but the article's subject appears to pass more than one criterium of WP:NOTFILM. Cavarrone (talk) 09:37, 19 December 2011 (UTC) The above discussion is...

TWL) Non-notable film lacking Ghits and GNEWS of substance. Faills WP:NOTFILM. Related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Spirit of the Beast‎ and...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No references, very few Google results. Fails WP:NOTFILM. Jinkinson talk to me 13:47, 24 November 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

Baseball,Baby! balls•strikes 20:46, 15 August 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTFILM: Unreleased Films. --Thatdog 07:39, 16 August 2006 (UTC) The above discussion...

(talk) 09:32, 6 December 2009 (UTC) Delete, doesn't meet any of the WP:NOTFILM criteria. Cassandra 73 (talk) 12:25, 6 December 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate...

discussions. North America1000 16:21, 4 June 2015 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:NOTFILM. Only ref is facebook page which is not a WP:RS. Only info there is the...

independent of the subject. Doesn't meet any of the more specific criteria at WP:NOTFILM. No major awards, no indication of mainstream critical reviews. The only...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet notability criteria at WP:NOTFILM. Krychek (talk) 21:50, 14 December 2016 (UTC) Delete as citing RottenTomatoes...

google search.[1]. No evidence that this meets the requirements of WP:NOTFILM or is otherwise a notable production. Eluchil404 (talk) 06:23, 17 December...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) An upcoming film possibly failed WP:NOTFILM. I don't see the film received significant coverage in reliable sources...

hard is it to get on there? Cheers TigerShark 21:15, 24 July 2006 (UTC) NOTFILM would not apply here anyway, as it's a nonbinding essay lacking broad support...

TWL) Non-notable film lacking Ghits and GNEWS of substance. Faills WP:NOTFILM. Related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M.A.R.R.A‎‎ and Wikipedia:Articles...

the awards finds nothing to support the statement. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 14:54, 2 December 2015 (UTC) The article has been edited...

Google. There seems to be no way to conclude this is a notable film per WP:NOTFILM. Tim Pierce (talk) 13:56, 4 September 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

content of their films. I feel that Kaos Films doesn't quite meet the WP:NOTFILM standard. NJ Wine (talk) 03:21, 27 May 2012 (UTC) The above discussion...

Blanning(talk) 13:36, 24 October 2006 (UTC) This film lacks notability and fails WP:NOTFILM. A google search [1] returns 256 hits, none which are independent, reliable...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM and the GNG. No nontrivial GNews or GBooks hits. No reliable sources. The...

2013 (UTC) Keep In its current state the article does now seem to meet WP:NOTFILM. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:19, 9 November 2013 (UTC) The above discussion...

reliable sources -- Whpq (talk) 14:12, 12 August 2009 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NOTFILM Niteshift36 (talk) 14:21, 14 August 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is...

delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Does not pass WP:NOTFILM. No full length reviews for it other than at its website,and by trivial...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM FITINDIA (talk) 18:02, 17 April 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film lacking non-trivial support. Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 14:26, 20 April 2014 (UTC) At this point I can only argue...

article. VQuakr (talk) 03:27, 25 January 2013 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 03:31, 25 January 2013 (UTC) Delete. No indication of...

Delete No independent sources at all. This article completely fails WP:NOTFILM. NJ Wine (talk) 21:20, 30 May 2012 (UTC) Delete I can't find anything indicating...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet the WP:NOTFILM criteria at all. No reliable sources, no significant coverage. A few YouTube...

although it's listed at imdb, there's nothing that makes it meet the WP:NOTFILM criteria. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:47, 9 July 2009 (UTC) Note:...

basic background. It should be a valid page pending the adoption of the WP:NOTFILM issue. Furthermore, it may be argued that credit for major roles in feature...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film lacking non-trivial support. Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 21:42, 16 April 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film not yet filming. Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 14:34, 12 April 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM as this failed to receive reliable coverage in third party sources. Beerest355...

They both fail to make a claim of notability and both fail WP:GNG and WP:NOTFILM for lack of coverage. It received none, so far as I can tell. The article...

02:05, 15 March 2017 (UTC) Delete. As I wrote in the initial AFD, fails WP:NOTFILM, and has no coverage shown in reliable independent sources. The Pink Grand...

Non-notable animated series lacking GHits and GNEWS. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 06:34, 20 December 2010 (UTC) Speedy delete as promotion/advertising...

6 June 2011 (UTC) Delete No evidence of notability and thus fails WP:NOTFILM. The previous AFD someone said "It is a notable fan film", yet there is...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM namely because independent, reliable sources have not written about this...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM. No references at all. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:35...

TWL) Non-notable film. Lacking GNEWS and GHits of substance. Fails WP:NOTFILM ttonyb1 (talk) 22:48, 13 August 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

(UTC) Delete One of the most clear-cut examples of failing to meet WP:NOTFILM I could imagine. In fact, the lead sentence of the article says it all...

to) WP:NOTBLOG, WP:NOTADVERTISING and WP:NOR. The article also fails WP:NOTFILM. Eduemoni↑talk↓ 03:02, 16 March 2011 (UTC) Comment - If this article eventually...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTFILM. Per future films: Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources...

forgot to mention that the article doesn't attempt in any way to meet WP:NOTFILM and the lack of references doesn't make it easy to verify notability. Cyphoidbomb...

of substance and I can find no significant coverage elsewhere. Fails WP:NOTFILM. PC78 (talk) 17:22, 18 April 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Film that lacks non-trivial secondary support. Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 17:55, 22 June 2015 (UTC) Delete unless sources can be...

protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Delete per WP:NOTFILM Mayalld (talk) 08:59, 21 December 2007 (UTC) Comment - I thought it was...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Fails WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 03:44, 18 March 2011 (UTC) More Print articles coming march...

Delete non notable film (only awards from MAJOR film festivals satisfy WP:NOTFILM Mayalld (talk) 19:20, 31 August 2008 (UTC) Keep, although not an incredibly...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM; article has no substantive content. Parody does not inherit the notability...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of notability. Fails WP:NOTFILM. Also the creater of the page is closely associated with the film. Their...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM, no useful content, more than sufficiently covered in Montana Fishburne...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM. Some trivial coverage, but no significant coverage. Brycehughes (talk)...

notable that a non-produced film in the series must be notable. And WP:NOTFILM does specifically discourage articles on unproduced films except in special...

March 2012 (UTC) keep This animated short film is notable per Wikipedia:NOTFILM (significant involvement of several notable persons: Jack Mercer, Max Fleischer...

--Non-Dropframe talk 18:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC) Delete - Fails to meet WP:NOTFILM or WP:GNG. reddogsix (talk) 18:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate...

not find any reliable sources to add to it. The article also fails WP:NOTFILM. --Slon02 (talk) 00:22, 2 August 2010 (UTC) Keep. It looks to be an earlier...

--Milowent • hasspoken 05:52, 23 December 2011 (UTC) KeepAS It passes WP:NOTFILM and WP:V. Cavarrone (talk) 18:34, 26 December 2011 (UTC) The above discussion...

PROD. No sources found to establish the notability of this film, fails WP:NOTFILM and WP:GNG. —Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) talk 02:54, 31 March 2010 (UTC)...

Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:52, 13 January 2018 (UTC) TOOSOON to meet the WP:NOTFILM requirements, namely having a significant or lasting impact on film.--SamHolt6...

Despite that, nah, delete. TFOWR 17:37, 13 July 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTFILM (once film is released it may qualify for inclusion). elektrikSHOOS 17:45...

2009 (UTC) Delete: Indie film that doesn't meet any of the elements of WP:NOTFILM even were it released, which it has not been. Of the three references listed...

16 October 2006 (UTC) Delete Doesn't even qualify under the proposed WP:NOTFILM guidelines. Hostage High is actually the DVD release title of the truely...

delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Fails WP:NOTFILM - no references/citation for WP:V or internal links from other wiki articles...

2006 (UTC) fairly nn, unfinished/unreleased film. Fails the proposed WP:NOTFILM and gets 48 unique google hits [1]. I like Ernest films as much as the...

JSTOR · TWL) 2023 Film? No evidence filming has started, appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 22:01, 10 May 2015 (UTC) Speedy delete as a hoax by "Newryst...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS. Fails WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 18:37, 23 April 2011 (UTC) Delete. It clearly fails notability...

amusingly bad as this whole movie is, it just doesn't meet WP:N and WP:NOTFILM in any way — the writer is a red link with no notable credits on IMDb;...

its various reprints) we do not (yet) have enough WP:RS to satisfy WP:NOTFILM. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:15, 19 September 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate...

(talk • contrib) - 17:58, 14 April 2008 (UTC) Delete and redirect per WP:NOTFILM.--EclipseSSD (talk) 18:02, 19 April 2008 (UTC) Redirect to Edgar Wright#Upcoming...

TWL) Non-notable film lacking Ghits and GNEWS of substance. Faills WP:NOTFILM. Related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Spirit of the Beast‎ and...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOTFILM Northern Lights is not notable enough for its own article. Despite that...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NOTFILM, does not meet WP:SIGCOV, Found no hits on Google, only music and video...

2006 (UTC) Keep per Andrew Lenahan. And easily passes the proposed WP:NOTFILM. --Marriedtofilm 23:41, 17 October 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Fails to meet WP:NOTFILM Gigs (talk) 00:55, 4 June 2009 (UTC) Redirect Weak keep per below, or redirect...

28 August 2015 (UTC) Delete - Where to start, db-advert, db-hoax, wp:notfilm. reddogsix (talk) 23:35, 28 August 2015 (UTC) Delete for failing WP:V and...

incorrectly interpreting WP:NOTFILM. Your claim that all films must ALSO pass GNG makes WP:NOTFILM entirely useless. WP:NOTFILM should just be a redirect...

reliable sources that I can find, I have to say that it fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTFILM. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:32, 6 April 2015 (UTC) P.S. There is one external...

Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 25 March 2016 (UTC) Delete per nomination. Fails WP:NOTFILM and basic WP:GNG, as the only sources I could find were either first-party...

film lacking GHits of substance and with no GNEWS. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM ttonyb1 (talk) 05:11, 22 August 2009 (UTC) Comment if deleted, this should...

films/videos notable in themselves, and only if they otherwise satisfy the WP:NOTFILM or WP:GNG, neither of which are evident here. It may, however, be possible...

(UTC) Delete. The film fails to meet any of the criteria set out at WP:NOTFILM and WP:NFF. I would be satisfied enough and !vote keep had I been able...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM. No evidence of significant third party coverage of this YouTube video...

Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 17:51, 8 February 2011 (UTC) Delete Doesn't meet appropriate...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM, no other indication of notability under the GNG or any specialized guideline...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This film doesn't seem to meet WP:NOTFILM - many press releases are cited, and I cannot find significant examples...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Fails WP:NOTFILM. Given the work that has been done on the article by Schmidt, the article...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of notability per WP:NOTFILM KunalForYouContribsTalk 13:43, 2 April 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film, failing both WP:N and WP:NOTFILM. Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources...

them are trivial - either listings of screening times and venues which WP:NOTFILM specifically and explicitly debars or casual mentions. Honestly, I prefer...

02:38, 28 November 2011 (UTC) Speedy - As Spam, if not, certainly fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 02:40, 28 November 2011 (UTC) Alls im saying is i dont...

23 March 2017 (UTC) Delete per my argument in the prior AFD: "fails WP:NOTFILM, and has no coverage shown in reliable independent sources. The Pink Grand...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:PROMO page created by WP:COI user. Fails WP:NOTFILM. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:23, 22 November 2016 (UTC)...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of WP:NOTFILM. User with a history of WP:PROMO Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing)...

October 2013 (UTC) "intense and emotional" have nothing to do with Wikipedia:NOTFILM Gaijin42 (talk) 19:55, 22 October 2013 (UTC) Weak keep. Not going to set...

Youth. Delete – Notability is based on a film that appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. WP:ONEVENT applies. ttonyb (talk) 19:32, 2 July 2010 (UTC) Note: This...

19:39, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. Does not meet requirements of WP:NOTFILM or otherwise show notability. Eluchil404 23:52, 28 September 2007 (UTC)...

logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Delete non notable film, fails WP:NOTFILM Mayalld (talk) 15:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM, and no page on IMDB and during a Google search no reliable source to demonstrate...

Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 17:52, 11 November 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable TV movie, fails WP:NOTFILM, prod removed with edit summary: "Removed to prevent sockpuppetry" Jezhotwells...

Mayalld 20:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC) Comment I gave you that wrong; it's WP:NOTFILM, not WP:FILM. To answer your question directly: the easiest thing to find...

establish notability. Lacks non-trivial support. Non-notable film failing WP:NOTFILM reddogsix (talk) 02:57, 11 December 2015 (UTC) Comment - This page isn't...

stuff exists. The bottom line is the film fails to meet the criteria in WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 21:45, 24 February 2014 (UTC) Keep per substantial coverage...

the subject in detail. The films themselves are not exactly notable (WP:NOTFILM). Have searched for sources about the subject, and have found more sites...

reviews are capsule reviews, which are considered trivial for films under WP:NOTFILM, any reason why they should prove notability for video games? — Preceding...

shred of evidence to suggest the film is being made, which violates WP:NOTFILM and WP:CRYSTAL, and the article creator can seem to give no official source...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The film fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTFILM. The article is currently unsourced and I was unable to find any reliable...

Non-notable film lacking ghit and Gnews of substance. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 04:45, 27 April 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Articles does not meet WP:NOTFILM for notability and does not have significant coverage in independent sources...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film lacking GHit and GNEWS of substance. Fails WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 23:55, 27 December 2010 (UTC) Delete - As the nominator...

not because "Bollywood is a high output genre", given the terms of WP:NOTFILM. The notability criteria of film does not talk about output of the industry...

significant coverage in independent, reliable sources to meet WP:GNG or WP:NOTFILM. Sarah-Jane (talk) 13:52, 1 December 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

GNEWs of substance. Film is in development and not yet filming. Fails WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 13:12, 4 June 2011 (UTC) Comment. This film is fully completed...

claimed award is not a "major" award for "excellence" as required by WP:NOTFILM. This is just a collection of castlists, not an encyclopedic article. Hullaballoo...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOTFILM; this film has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that...

actors. No evidence of notability whatever. Fails WP:GNG and of course WP:NOTFILM in particular andy (talk) 17:16, 10 February 2011 (UTC) Delete. As per...

—Capitalistroadster (talk) 06:46, 24 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NOTFILM. WWGB (talk) 10:15, 24 February 2009 (UTC) Strong delete Clearly not notable...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film lacking trivial coverage. Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 23:02, 8 December 2013 (UTC) The film the vision of paolo...

contesting its existence, but it's notability. You might want to refer to WP:NOTFILM to see what we generally require to assert notability. You should also...

reliable sources that are independent of the subject. as outlined in WP:NOTFILM. Nsaa (talk) 22:23, 24 March 2009 (UTC) Delete per nom. Not a usual comment...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM at minimum and probably GNG as well (any sources that do exist do not give...

views) (delete) – (View log) Non-notable film project. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. No significant GNEWS or GHITS ttonyb1 (talk) 19:44, 28 June 2009 (UTC)...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM KylieTastic (talk) 21:39, 17 April 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

film more than five years old, notability on the film directly fails WP:NOTFILM. However there is other evidence of notability: significant involvement...

Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:47, 7 December 2014 (UTC) Delete -per WP:NOTFILM. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 14:47, 7 December 2014 (UTC) purported cast (Find...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A film that does not meet WP:NOTFILM. Unable to find reliable sources suggesting notability. There social media...

coverage. Jminthorne (talk) 00:30, 22 June 2010 (UTC) Keep Notable per WP:NOTFILM No. 1.--Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 06:53, 22 June 2010 (UTC) Note: This...

JSTOR · TWL) Created over 3 years ago and still has no sources to meet WP:NOTFILM. Prod removed without either comment or notification. TerriersFan (talk)...

(UTC) Keep After the massive revisions to the article, it clearly meets WP:NOTFILM, so I am changing my vote to keep. NJ Wine (talk) 12:26, 25 May 2012 (UTC)...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 15:27, 21 January 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

(UTC) Delete and redirect to TransTales Entertainment. Does not meet WP:NOTFILM. —Josh3580talk/hist 20:29, 27 January 2014 (UTC) Do not delete. This is...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Fails WP:NOTFILM. References/links are all blogs. reddogsix (talk) 01:59, 12 November 2011...

as: N(E), EVENT, NEWSEVENT, NNEWS, NEVENTS) Films (also known as: NFILM, NOTFILM, NF, FILMNOT, MOVIE) Geographic features (also known as NGEO, NGEOG, NGEOGRAPHY...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of passing WP:NOTFILM EuroPride (talk) 20:04, 25 April 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

deletion discussions. —Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:15, 6 May 2010 (UTC) WP:NOTFILM does allow for cases where the film in question "features significant involvement...

movies. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC) DELETE per nom, WP:NOTFILM, WP:NFF. --ColonelHenry (talk) 05:57, 27 January 2014 (UTC) (edit conflict)...

do have WP:WEB point 3 (for websites), WP:BK point 2 (for books) and WP:NOTFILM point 3 (for films), all establishing that wining a major award is grounds...

--Metropolitan90 14:08, 28 July 2006 (UTC) Delete as not-notable under WP:NOTFILM guidelines, as well as WP:V and WP:OR concerns. If author(s) can cite verifiable...

relating to notability of any films, English-language or otherwise. WP:NOTFILM was not outright rejected, but it is considered historical. -- Kicking222...

garnered no coverage in independent reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG & WP:NOTFILM. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:54, 1 July 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

bit longer, but it seems unlikely this is going to be able to meet WP:NOTFILM. Meters (talk) 21:12, 15 February 2015 (UTC) Delete WP:NFF Two weeks since...

notability guidelines such as WP:NMUSIC, WP:NWEB, WP:PROF, WP:NBOOK, WP:NOTFILM, and WP:NSPORT take major awards as evidence of notability. In fact, I...

for inclusion on that basis (I dunno), as the proposed guidelines at WP:NOTFILM don't make it clear whether that's enough to merit inclusion or not. Badbilltucker...

should be added. 69.116.62.33 03:07, 23 August 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTFILM "films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly...

cited source is the IMDB. Does not seem to pass any of the criteria at WP:NOTFILM. DES (talk) 20:36, 2 March 2010 (UTC) Delete as per my nom unless independent...

TWL) De-prodded without explanation by the creator. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTFILM. Also, WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:48,...

Cannot find any indication the film has started filming. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 05:09, 24 September 2010 (UTC) Delete as article fails notability...

Guy (Help!) 19:57, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Delete - fails criteria for WP:NOTFILM. Keep (see comment below) - There may have been 12 episodes made, but that...

don't normally do Adf for films so did not know the exact guideline. WP:NOTFILM#Other evidence of notability #1 and #2 and some basic common sense that...

Delete - Not seeing where this satisfies a single criteria required by WP:NOTFILM. The article reads like a tedious fanboy blog. Tarc (talk) 14:03, 22 October...

The IMDB reference and others do not meet notability guidelines per WP:NOTFILM 3) There is no full-length featured newspaper articles from large circulation...

patrol and it appears to be a non-notable political documentary. Per WP:NOTFILM a film either needs to meet the WP:GNG through multiple reliable independent...

links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Delete nn film, fails WP:NOTFILM Mayalld (talk) 13:02, 23 December 2008 (UTC) Delete: Per nom. --OliverTwisted...

they are relatively minor festivals, as they are here. And of course WP:NOTFILM#Other_evidence_of_notability only kicks in for the festival selection if...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film, per WP:NOTFILM - direct-to-video release, filmed in two days, no major awards or coverage...

film, as does any other, must fulfill criteria set forth in WP:GNG and WP:NOTFILM. If you have evidence that it does, feel free to present it.  RGTraynor ...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) As per WP:NOTFILM. It is simply the Hindi dubbed version of "The Incredibles", with no differences...

Notability for films can be based upon a significant cultural impact (see WP:NOTFILM, requirements 2, 4, and 5), however can also be based on winning a notable...

(talk) 06:53, 15 September 2010 (UTC) Keep per Cirt, and WP:N, WP:V, and WP:NOTFILM. Clearly notable, with plenty of references, and the title of the documentary...

2009 (UTC) I'm going to do what I hate, and quote policy. This is from WP:NOTFILM: It excludes "Trivial coverage", which would apply to the NY Times article...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:NOTFILM. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reddogsix (talk • contribs) 04:15...

does not produce any WP:RSes that I could find proving notability re: WP:NOTFILM. And no notability is given via solely Reagan or Paramount, as said above...

Beerest355 Talk 14:33, 30 June 2013 (UTC) Keep Notable per Wikipedia:NOTFILM: "The film features significant involvement (i.e., one of the most important...

notability. Armbrust (talk) 11:47, 11 December 2009 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:NOTFILM. Sock of Lord Spongefrog (Talk to m'Lord) 17:04, 6 December 2009 (UTC)...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTFILM. No sources in article indicating significance. Searching for Reboot "Martin...

obeys Wikipedia's notability requirements for films. In accordance with WP:NOTFILM, "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that...

The release dates aren't important. I'd really recommend you go read WP:NOTFILM, WP:CREATIVE and, most importantly, WP:GNG before you create any further...

watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Fails to show notability (WP:NOTFILM) and I'm unable to locate any RS. APK coffee talk 06:41, 7 July 2009 (UTC)...

does it meet WP:NOTFILM? -- ChrisO 20:04, 9 September 2007 (UTC) Why don't you let editors make comments unencumbered by yours? The NOTFILM argument has...

watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Fails to show notability (WP:NOTFILM) and I'm unable to locate any RS. The user has removed the PROD without...

after the film is released (at which time it seems likely it will meet WP:NOTFILM). Worldbruce (talk) 08:21, 25 December 2015 (UTC) Delete WP:NOT YET (films)...

something that is not a BIO... We have only a guideline for films and it is WP:NOTFILM. It requires Awards, not nominations.--Cavarrone (talk) 07:40, 16 December...

September 2006 (UTC) Delete as WP is not a crystal ball. Please see WP:NOTFILM for an idea of what we'd be looking for out a movie article. True, this...

Film-related deletions. -- A. B. (talk) 00:43, 5 December 2007 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTFILM WP:BIO. The Genie is Canada's national film award and TIFF is one of the...

sources that are substantially about the film. Please see WP:GNG and WP:NOTFILM. I'm also confused: the article says the film is called "Corruption Gov"...

director/author was interviewed does not support notability. The article fails WP:NOTFILM. Just being mentioned in articles, no matter what language, is not evidence...

minutes of notoriety about to expire, fails WP:NOT#NEWS, WP:WEB and WP:NOTFILM, no lasting significance and failed notability. WWGB (talk) 11:57, 6 September...

discussed in the media; until then, it is not even close to meeting WP:NOTFILM. I hope you continue to work with Wikipedia:WikiProject Film (and Wikipedia:WikiProject...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM. Prod removed by Anon IP. ttonyb (talk) 16:07, 15 November 2010 (UTC) Note:...

Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 21:25, 31 July 2010 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NOTFILM, and has no coverage shown in reliable independent sources. The Pink Grand...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of notability. Fails WP:NOTFILM. Prime WP:NOTYET candidate. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:13...

Orange Mike | Talk 03:21, 14 November 2014 (UTC) Delete Per WP:GNG and WP:NOTFILM. Possibly WP:SELFPROMOTION as well MarnetteD|Talk 03:43, 14 November 2014...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject fails WP:NOTFILM as is a non-notable independent film which has yet to be released (aside...

obeys Wikipedia's notability requirements for films. In accordance with WP:NOTFILM, "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM. Bbb23 (talk) 23:48, 26 November 2011 (UTC) Keep I've added a reference...

notability. I don't see anything in the article or the DRV meeting WP:N or WP:NOTFILM. Eluchil404 06:36, 26 September 2007 (UTC) Nuke it again... and again....

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM. No real coverage in third-party sources. Rotten Tomatoes, for example...

where WP:V and arguable WP:N are met, no deletion is necessary even if WP:NOTFILM calls for a merge and redirect. Eluchil404 (talk) 23:35, 17 January 2009...

WP:OSTRICH in nominations, it's clearly a notable film and easily passes WP:NOTFILM#Released_films item 1. This nomination should be withdrawn. The article...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced article does not meet WP:NOTFILM requirements Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 15:24, 19 November 2014 (UTC) Note:...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced article does not meet WP:NOTFILM guidelines Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 15:31, 19 November 2014 (UTC) Note:...

don't have a page on the publication). At this time, it doesn't satisfy WP:NOTFILM. If it takes the world by storm on July 25, it can always be recreated...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM, as there are no reliable sources available to confirm its notability....

significant coverage outside of reviews (which indicates notability per WP:NOTFILM). Let me explain, Roger Ebert gives the subject two paragraphs, but nothing...

JSTOR · TWL) lack of indi secondary sources fails GNG. Film doesn't meet WP:NOTFILM Widefox; talk 18:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC) Looks a bit WP:TOOSOON. Widefox;...

covered by Wikipedia, it does not elaborate on what "trivial" means but WP:NOTFILM gives this explanation of "trivial coverage": newspaper listings of screening...

production company. No significant independent press coverage. Doesn't meet WP:NOTFILM. Created for promotion of an actress, would need to be rewritten significantly...

notability: the Wikipedia is not, I repeat ***NOT*** the IMDB. See WP:NOTFILM, and you will find this movie does not appear to fulfill the basic criteria...

criticism that most movie articles on English Wikipedia lack (I think both WP:NOTFILM and WP:GNG have been satisfied). I'm depressingly Spanish illiterate. The...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film lacking non-trivial support. Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 03:44, 11 September 2015 (UTC) Right now, neither the...

not in filming or even in production. No IMDB hit. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM ttonyb (talk) 14:58, 25 March 2010 (UTC) Check out Simon Pegg's twitter...

and it kind of is. --Hanging Jack 18:34, 30 August 2007 (UTC) rebut: WP:NOTFILM. The film hasn't received significant coverage. It hasn't been released...

leading documentary film festival -- alone would be enough to meet WP:NOTFILM (imo). No need to revisit, also imo. It's a notable documentary film, whatever...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of passing WP:NOTFILM. EuroPride (talk) 15:34, 24 April 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

that out, but none of the sources you added get the article to pass WP:NOTFILM, the notability guidelines for films. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 04:45...

these reviews. There is a fact tag there. However, after re-reading WP:NOTFILM I will withdraw my vote. --OZOO (What?) 20:46, 30 September 2007 (UTC)...

2010 (UTC) Favoring keeping for these reasons: ' WP:CREATIVE WP:GNG WP:NOTFILM WP:INDY Describes the value of having sources independent of the subject...

don't the article currently meets WP:GNG. However, my question is with WP:NOTFILM and the two major reviews criteria. IMDB lists 14 reviews of the film.[13]...

for this not-even-existent film, and no other claim to notability per WP:NOTFILM. An obvious attempt to use Wikipedia as free advertising for a non-notable...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film appearing to fail WP:NOTFILM. Played at a few festivals and won a single small award, but lacks in-depth...

I'm changing my vote to keep. I think this movie just barely meets WP:NOTFILM. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 20:24, 1 April 2015 (UTC) Keep...

com/title/tt1858600/ which at least lists the cast, but nothing else. Fails WP:NOTFILM, WP:GNG and while not an album, fails WP:NALBUMS. Walter Görlitz (talk)...

WP:NOTFILM. The article was created by the film's director. Jim Heaphy (talk) 05:43, 5 March 2010 (UTC) Delete Fails notability under WP:NOTFILM. Mootros...

JSTOR · TWL) Shoestring-budget zombie flick that satisfies neither WP:NOTFILM nor the general notability guideline. Article created by the film's publicist...

a flip flop. I just deleted my delete vote, solely on the basis of WP:NOTFILM and the section "The film features significant involvement (ie. one of...

listed on my userpage. The one that probably excited me most was when WP:NOTFILM was tagged as a guideline in line with consensus. Though the current text...

Delete Non-notable student film made for a couple hundred bucks. Fails WP:NOTFILM and WP:WEB. I could barely find any relevant Google hits ["Legiones Redde"+"Robert...

comments regarding WP:NOTFILM don't hold water. Neither being shot on 35mm film nor having a theatrical release is listed as a NOTFILM criterion (and neither...

primary sources. This simply does not meet the minimum standards for WP:NOTFILM and WP:WEB. SkierRMH 16:42, 9 July 2007 (UTC) Keep, Give it time to improveMark...

18:35, 16 July 2025 (UTC) Delete fails to establish as per notability WP:NOTFILM.--FreaksIn 19:06, 16 July 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film lacking GHits or GNEW. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 15:58, 13 March 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 16:33, 1 August 2018 (UTC) Comment - the fact that it was screened at a film festival makes it notable. And per WP:NOTFILM,...

03:31, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Change to Strong Keep movie clearly meets WP:NOTFILM, produced in Fiji (major accomplishment) and distributed by Buena Vista...

in this genre. Now, the main argument at these debates has been that WP:NOTFILM-- which they all pass-- is irrelevant due to WP:GNG. This endangers not...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Once again, fails WP:NOTFILM, as the principle photography has not yet begun. Fbifriday (talk) 08:54...

it than that -- does Madhuve Madhu Tamashe Nodu, for example, meet WP:NOTFILM? NE Ent 23:45, 29 November 2014 (UTC) Looking at some of those main points...

Delete: obscure independent film lacking even the assertion of meeting WP:NOTFILM. Only sources cited in the article are the website of the film's own production...

but WP:NOTFILM does not make exceptions in those cases and for good reason since anything can happen. In short, it clearly fails WP:NOTFILM. SQGibbon...

they're all relevant with that many search terms). In short: fails WP:NOTFILM and WP:RS. Included in nomination: Night of the Day of the Dawn of the...

WP:RS. BTW, there are guidelines to establish the notability of films WP:NOTFILM. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 22:20, 26 July 2009 (UTC) IMDB, is also cited...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Declined speedy nominee. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:25, 6 December 2009 (UTC) Delete unnotable film spammed...

here and regarding the funding organization's founder here). Reading WP:NOTFILM, I am not sure whether the Marbella International Film Festival counts...

(UTC) Not if you bother to read WP:NOTFILM. Niteshift36 (talk) 07:34, 8 October 2009 (UTC) I've bothered to read WP:NOTFILM thank you and it doesn't trump...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film lacking non-trivial support. Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 03:44, 11 September 2015 (UTC) Right now, neither the...

November 2006 (UTC) The proposal does address this in general terms at WP:NOTFILM#Unreleased_films, but I would suggest slighly more specific rules of thumb...

must not be reading WP:NOTFILM or WP:GNG, because you wouldn't be claiming that it has received a "ton of coverage". NOTFILM specifically says that basic...

television broadcast should not be classified as the kind of re-release that WP:NOTFILM is referring to. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:36, 8 March 2010 (UTC) I think...

in multiple WP:RS indicating that this in fact a work that satisfies WP:NOTFILM. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:20, 20 March 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate...

about this film (See MOS:Film) The film itself does not meet WP:GNG nor WP:NOTFILM. Specifically, it has not "received significant coverage in reliable sources...

fails WP:NOTFILM. In the news search above, I looked at about half of the hits and they were all excluded as sources of notability under WP:NOTFILM. Mostly...

WP:POLITICIAN. This is a roundabout way of justifying inclusion. Just as WP:NOTFILM tells us whether a film really deserves its own article despite satisfying...

WP:ENTERTAINER WP:ENT Notability requirements for entertainers Films WP:NOTFILM WP:NF Notability requirements for films Films, future WP:NFF Notability...

guidelines in WP:NOTFILM. It's great that the blog has been visited 130,000 times but that does not do anything to meet the requirements of WP:NOTFILM. In addition...

Non-notable film lacking Ghits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 17:05, 13 February 2011 (UTC) Delete, no notability asserted...

November 2006 (UTC) The proposal does address this in general terms at WP:NOTFILM#Unreleased_films, but I would suggest slighly more specific rules of thumb...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM at minimum and probably GNG as well (any sources that do exist do not give...

2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTFILM. Bsimmons666 Weak delete. Othe than that silver award, which is secondary criteria for WP:NOTFILM, there are no reviews...

logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD) Film with no evidence of notability (WP:NOTFILM) provided or found. PROD removed by original editor, adding evidence of...

The result was delete. judging consensus against guidelines I note that NOTFILM cites being screened in a festival 5 years after release is evidence of...

- added to nomination by Shalom Hello No evidence of notability per WP:NOTFILM. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The saints and the sinners. Kevin...

per nom & WP:NOTFILM. --Evb-wiki 04:23, 19 June 2007 (UTC) Delete per Evb-wiki --Justanother 04:25, 19 June 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTFILM. I can't find...

after such sources that verify WP:NOTFILM are found.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 23:15, 14 March 2008 (UTC) delete - WP:NOTFILM sounds a lot like WP:MUSIC - something...

about, even if this film does not exist, and even if it never exists. WP:NOTFILM states that "if such an unreleased film can meet the criteria in our basic...

read WP:NOTFILM more carefully. No reviews that I can find; none in Rotten Tomatoes. Clarityfiend 14:53, 18 July 2007 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTFILM - imdb doesn't...

director/author was interviewed does not support notability. The article fails WP:NOTFILM. Just being mentioned in articles, no matter what language, is not evidence...

primary sources. This simply does not meet the minimum standards for WP:NOTFILM and WP:WEB. SkierRMH 16:42, 9 July 2007 (UTC) Keep, Give it time to improveMark...

Non-notable film. Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 02:46, 5 May 2017 (UTC) Speedy Delete as advertising and self-promotion. Fails WP:NOTFILM Melcous (talk) 09:03...

should be added. 69.116.62.33 03:07, 23 August 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTFILM "films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fairly generic series of porn films which fail WP:NOTFILM individually and collectively, with no indication that the GNG or any other...

links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD) Delete nn film, fails WP:NOTFILM Mayalld (talk) 13:02, 23 December 2008 (UTC) Delete: Per nom. --OliverTwisted...

short film that fails WP:NOTFILM and GNG. --Non-Dropframe talk 23:40, 21 May 2015 (UTC) Delete - Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 10:06, 22...

WP:FILM. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:43, 9 December 2011 (UTC) Delete - Per WP:NOTFILM, "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced...

Annamonckton (talk) 14:48, 15 March 2008 (UTC) It says specifically in WP:NOTFILM That imdb is not a reliable source.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 15:05, 15 March...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Film not yet in principal photography, per WP:NOTFILM. GoldenRing (talk) 06:28, 16 March 2015 (UTC) Do not delete. Who told you...

significant coverage in reliable sources. Also, it does not seem to satisfy WP:NOTFILM#Other evidence of notability. I have no opinion. Hut 8.5 13:16, 22 January...

Non-notable short film lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 20:11, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Keep - Initially To Inflict...

March 2016 (UTC) Delete - I don't see evidence that this film meets WP:NOTFILM, unless more reliable sources can be provided. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:49...

does it meet WP:NOTFILM? -- ChrisO 20:04, 9 September 2007 (UTC) Why don't you let editors make comments unencumbered by yours? The NOTFILM argument has...

March 2012 (UTC) keep This animated short film is notable per Wikipedia:NOTFILM (significant involvement of several notable persons: Jack Mercer, Max Fleischer...

cited source is the IMDB. Does not seem to pass any of the criteria at WP:NOTFILM. DES (talk) 20:36, 2 March 2010 (UTC) Delete as per my nom unless independent...

—Capitalistroadster (talk) 06:46, 24 February 2009 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NOTFILM. WWGB (talk) 10:15, 24 February 2009 (UTC) Strong delete Clearly not notable...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of notability per WP:NOTFILM KunalForYouContribsTalk 13:43, 2 April 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWs of substance. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 14:36, 19 August 2010 (UTC) According to the guidelines...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Fails WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 14:32, 5 May 2011 (UTC) Delete - nn film from a promotional...

Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:42, 11 April 2009 (UTC) Comment Please refer to WP:NOTFILM for the guidelines of notability for films. The salient prerequisite here...

nominator is suggesting that the film fails WP:NOTFILM, that is a moot point because GNG trumps NOTFILM every day of the week. Properly sourced and notable...

of substance and I can find no significant coverage elsewhere. Fails WP:NOTFILM. PC78 (talk) 16:56, 18 April 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

Everard Proudfoot (talk) 23:14, 12 September 2010 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NOTFILM; lots of reviews, but all basically from blogs. PhGustaf (talk) 23:32,...

The IMDB reference and others do not meet notability guidelines per WP:NOTFILM 3) There is no full-length featured newspaper articles from large circulation...

a flip flop. I just deleted my delete vote, solely on the basis of WP:NOTFILM and the section "The film features significant involvement (ie. one of...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:27, 7 November 2016 (UTC)...

reviews are capsule reviews, which are considered trivial for films under WP:NOTFILM, any reason why they should prove notability for video games? — Preceding...

(talk • contrib) - 17:58, 14 April 2008 (UTC) Delete and redirect per WP:NOTFILM.--EclipseSSD (talk) 18:02, 19 April 2008 (UTC) Redirect to Edgar Wright#Upcoming...

contribs) 15:36, 17 November 2008 (UTC) Please see the criteria listed at WP:NOTFILM. This may help to explain why this article has been listed for deletion...

speedy-deletion. Note that its pure existance doesn't fulfill any criteria of WP:NOTFILM. No reviews, no awards, no wide distribution, no major breaktrough in any...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film appearing to fail WP:NOTFILM. Played at a few festivals and won a single small award, but lacks in-depth...

actors. No evidence of notability whatever. Fails WP:GNG and of course WP:NOTFILM in particular andy (talk) 17:16, 10 February 2011 (UTC) Delete. As per...

these reviews. There is a fact tag there. However, after re-reading WP:NOTFILM I will withdraw my vote. --OZOO (What?) 20:46, 30 September 2007 (UTC)...

WP:NOTFILM). If nothing else, it's simply WP:TOOSOON. --Non-Dropframe talk 23:23, 10 June 2015 (UTC) Delete: Fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NOTFILM. BU...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Nominating for deletion as per WP:NOTFILM. The movie hasn't started shooting (indicated by its lack of significant...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM, as there are no reliable sources available to confirm its notability....

links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD) Delete nn film, fails WP:NOTFILM Mayalld (talk) 07:51, 7 January 2009 (UTC) How do you figure that? Did...

after the film is released (at which time it seems likely it will meet WP:NOTFILM). Worldbruce (talk) 08:21, 25 December 2015 (UTC) Delete WP:NOT YET (films)...

delete. No sources to verify claims of "award-winning", fails WP:BIO and WP:NOTFILM. KrakatoaKatie 16:03, 4 September 2007 (UTC) Andi Reiss (edit | talk |...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTFILM. Also, WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:21,...

(delete) – (View AfD) Non-notable short film. Lacks references and fails WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb1 (talk) 20:58, 9 June 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

film, as does any other, must fulfill criteria set forth in WP:GNG and WP:NOTFILM. If you have evidence that it does, feel free to present it.  RGTraynor ...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film. Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 22:44, 30 September 2017 (UTC) Delete. The article claims...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTFILM reddogsix (talk) 21:18, 2 March 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

September 2008 (UTC) Delete. Does not meet any of the guidlines of WP:NOTFILM or otherwise demonstrate notability. A quick google search does not find...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOTFILM, this film is not widely distributed, has no notable awards or coverage...

watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD) Delete non-notable film per WP:NOTFILM Mayalld (talk) 19:25, 31 August 2008 (UTC) Comment - Ghits for "Pardonnez-moi"...

TWL) Contested PROD. The PROD rationale, with which I agree, was Fails WP:NOTFILM. I can't find any independent reliable sources indicating that the notability...

Delete - Not seeing where this satisfies a single criteria required by WP:NOTFILM. The article reads like a tedious fanboy blog. Tarc (talk) 14:03, 22 October...

don't normally do Adf for films so did not know the exact guideline. WP:NOTFILM#Other evidence of notability #1 and #2 and some basic common sense that...

same standard of notability, which is why we have WP:BK, WP:MUSIC, WP:NOTFILM, and yes WP:EPISODE which trumps WP:N in this matter. It clearly states:...

Mayalld 20:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC) Comment I gave you that wrong; it's WP:NOTFILM, not WP:FILM. To answer your question directly: the easiest thing to find...

TWL) Non-notable film lacking Ghits and GNEWS of substance. Faills WP:NOTFILM. Related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Spirit of the Beast‎ and...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of passing WP:NOTFILM EuroPride (talk) 15:32, 24 April 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't need an article, certainly seems to fail WP:NOTFILM. Suggest merger with Rush (band) at the very least. magnius (talk) 21:50...

Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM ttonyb (talk) 18:08, 11 November 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

Guy (Help!) 19:57, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Delete - fails criteria for WP:NOTFILM. Keep (see comment below) - There may have been 12 episodes made, but that...

Film-related deletions. -- A. B. (talk) 00:43, 5 December 2007 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTFILM WP:BIO. The Genie is Canada's national film award and TIFF is one of the...

film lacking any GNEWS hits and without any GHits of substance. Fails WP:NOTFILM ttonyb1 (talk) 17:57, 30 August 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTFILM, and no page on IMDB and during a Google search no reliable source to demonstrate...

2010 (UTC) Favoring keeping for these reasons: ' WP:CREATIVE WP:GNG WP:NOTFILM WP:INDY Describes the value of having sources independent of the subject...

them. Firestorm Talk 02:14, 28 July 2009 (UTC) Delete: That would be WP:NOTFILM, and I concur.  RGTraynor  03:32, 28 July 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate...

2009 (UTC) Delete: Indie film that doesn't meet any of the elements of WP:NOTFILM even were it released, which it has not been. Of the three references listed...

multiple reliable secondary sources independent of the topic, fails WP:NOTFILM. Jay32183 20:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 21:30, 15 November 2009 (UTC) Delete: I found zero sources...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet the WP:NOTFILM criteria at all. No reliable sources, no significant coverage. A few YouTube...

Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. The talk page has indicated the article is about a trilogy and not about a single film and therefore the WP:NOTFILM may not apply...

Google. There seems to be no way to conclude this is a notable film per WP:NOTFILM. Tim Pierce (talk) 13:56, 4 September 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has...