Search Results: Wikipedia:NOTDEM
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
Rabu, 2026-06-03 16:45:44Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia. The amount of information on Wikipedia is practically unlimited, but Wikipedia does not aim to contain all knowledge...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Formula One pre-season testing (2nd nomination)
Jumat, 2025-12-12 01:17:17consensus? Several AfD until someone gets his way? STOP. You must accept WP:NOTDEM. Wikipedia is not a democracy but it built on consensus. There was no consensus...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional radio stations (2nd nomination)
Rabu, 2026-01-07 21:58:38I'd also like to say that this should be a discussion, not a vote (WP:NOTDEM). Most moves for deletion so far seem rather superficial in analysis. —CodeHydro...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JordanPetersonVideos
Minggu, 2025-12-14 02:39:54Therein is minor gatekeeping. I don't argue strongly against that, because WP:NOTDEM, I respect gatekeeping if it's both neutral and quality (to exclusion of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Storm Area 51, They Can't Stop All of Us
Rabu, 2025-12-10 13:20:44categories combined). Other comments such as "neutral" omitted. I'm aware of WP:NOTDEM, just wanted to point out a consensus seems to be building. Please let me...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive310
Sabtu, 2023-04-15 21:46:00understand or to not believe me (despite my directing him to WP:CONSENSUS and WP:NOTDEM). It would perhaps help if someone else--from outside this argument--could...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive225
Selasa, 2025-09-23 20:20:353F, I've assumed that your real question could be phrased, "Can I invoke NOTDEM prevent my losing the MOSDASH debate?" Sometimes we really do have to take...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepak Rawat
Sabtu, 2025-12-13 22:52:43added this.- WP:NPOL Well, All after this, Leaving it, I'm done. ✍️👉 WP:NOTDEM, WP:NOTBURO. Thanks. Regards. Aj Ajay Mehta 007 (talk) 08:44, 26 April 2021...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive322
Senin, 2026-02-09 00:31:41reason to call for re-opening a discussion on supposed miscounting. WP:NOTDEM:This is no a democracy, the discussion participants were not a jury, due...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive320
Sabtu, 2026-02-07 15:43:40explanation. When considered in its totality, and in consideration of WP:NOTDEM, what about the RfC actually looks like no-consensus? I think it's a legitimate...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enrique Marquez (accomplice)
Kamis, 2025-11-13 18:27:132015 (UTC) The close on that discussion appears to directly contradict WP:NOTDEM, so I would not give it precedential value. --Regards, James(talk/contribs)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 153
Selasa, 2026-03-03 04:23:40to "throw the bums out" contravenes the spirit of Wikipedia policy (WP:NOTDEM, WP:CONSENSUS and WP:NOTBURO). But more importantly, it's ethically wrong...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 101
Senin, 2020-11-16 17:45:58of the idea per self-contradictory interpretations of WP:NOTBURO or WP:NOTDEM mentioned in my essay. Wer900 • talk 23:48, 5 January 2013 (UTC) There are...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:2015 administrator election reform/Phase I/RfC
Selasa, 2026-01-06 03:23:20WP:CONSENSUS policy or the Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not policy. (WP:NOTDEM, in particular.) Consensus is supposed to apply at all times, not when it...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 July 17
Jumat, 2023-03-03 18:56:25categories combined). Other comments such as "neutral" omitted. I'm aware of WP:NOTDEM, just wanted to point out a consensus seems to be building. Please let me...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Macedonian Diaspora (2nd nomination)
Jumat, 2025-12-12 18:56:06over again. I also remind you of WP:CLUE, yes I know it's an essay, and WP:NOTDEM. But the only so-called "uninvolved editor", besides myself, who has actually...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 April 21
Minggu, 2021-05-09 14:12:05added this.- WP:NPOL Well, All after this, Leaving it, I'm done. ✍️👉 WP:NOTDEM, WP:NOTBURO. Thanks. Regards. Aj Ajay Mehta 007 (talk) 08:44, 26 April 2021...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 June 26
Selasa, 2020-07-07 08:24:25over again. I also remind you of WP:CLUE, yes I know it's an essay, and WP:NOTDEM. But the only so-called "uninvolved editor", besides myself, who has actually...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 June 24
Jumat, 2020-07-03 15:15:38consensus? Several AfD until someone gets his way? STOP. You must accept WP:NOTDEM. Wikipedia is not a democracy but it built on consensus. There was no consensus...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 March 20
Senin, 2021-03-29 11:48:46Therein is minor gatekeeping. I don't argue strongly against that, because WP:NOTDEM, I respect gatekeeping if it's both neutral and quality (to exclusion of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 December 17
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:46:092015 (UTC) The close on that discussion appears to directly contradict WP:NOTDEM, so I would not give it precedential value. --Regards, James(talk/contribs)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 March 1
Jumat, 2023-03-03 18:53:23forcible argument for saving it as is. However according to WP:VOTES and WP:NOTDEM it would be preferable to find a WP:CONS. As you ask to “NOT DELETE THIS...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 September 17
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:29:50I'd also like to say that this should be a discussion, not a vote (WP:NOTDEM). Most moves for deletion so far seem rather superficial in analysis. —CodeHydro...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SkyWay Group
Rabu, 2025-12-10 12:58:35forcible argument for saving it as is. However according to WP:VOTES and WP:NOTDEM it would be preferable to find a WP:CONS. As you ask to “NOT DELETE THIS...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 June
Minggu, 2020-05-31 07:04:21reconsider, except perhaps what I could summarise by raising the red flag wp:NOTDEM, also can’t suppress “weasel” as a response to “esteemed”. Yogesh Khandke...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 June 5
Kamis, 2021-08-19 15:11:38reconsider, except perhaps what I could summarise by raising the red flag wp:NOTDEM, also can’t suppress “weasel” as a response to “esteemed”. Yogesh Khandke...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests/Archive 88
Senin, 2026-02-16 05:56:2715:52, 14 October 2010 (UTC) Wikipedia doesnt actually use voting. See WP:NOTDEM and WP:CONSENSUS. If someones !vote is based on reasoning that is not supported...
Click to read more »