DOKUMEN123.COM

Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia. The amount of information on Wikipedia is practically unlimited, but Wikipedia does not aim to contain all knowledge...

be made to this page. The result of the discussion was Delete per WP:NOTBATTLE. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:11, 21 January 2011 (UTC) I came across this page...

lot of local news coverage? Finally, suggest you refresh yourself on WP:NOTBATTLE. Weak keep I could not see any specific significant coverage but there...

notability is about the topic not the current state of the page. Also WP:NOTBATTLE. JMWt (talk) 15:46, 30 October 2016 (UTC) Comment. There are MANY reasons...

forever on this. Speciate (talk) 18:07, 16 May 2012 (UTC) Please see WP:NOTBATTLE. The topic of a stand-alone article has to be notable, but separate notability...

for deletion, but I support WP:ATD for the sake of WP:CONSENSUS and WP:NOTBATTLE. It's good to find alternatives that build common ground. Shooterwalker...

guideline about the post. This would be congruent with the information at WP:NOTBATTLE. Thank you for your consideration. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:03, 22 August...

the community and at odds with our mission to write an encyclopedia. WP:NOTBATTLE, WP:NOTBURO. Forbidding an editor to discuss an aspect of the community...

of sight during the case, and avoided sanctions. [8] After I reply “WP:NOTBATTLE”, he thanked me and deleted offending material, then I thanked him. Then...

on ideological a battle, or nurture hatred which are disallowed per WP:NOTBATTLE. As for the statement on the page, "For the record, I am not being a douche...

per WP:DISPUTE. --Mark viking (talk) 17:27, 19 February 2013 (UTC) WP:NOTBATTLE Please don't encourage farcical WP:DISPUTES. I have better things to do...

{list the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct} WP:NOTBATTLE (part of WP:NOT) WP:NPOV WP:Disruptive editing (Provide diffs of the comments...

2013 (UTC) Admins note this person is disruptively editing: [21] (WP:NOTBATTLE), [22] (WP:NPA). (edit conflict) Blocked – for a period of 24 hours King...

examples of Joe accusing people of trolling. here WP:NPA WP:CIVIL WP:NOTBATTLE WP:3RR WP:NLT This summary of the dispute is written by the users who...

a period of one week for the egregious violations of both 3RR and WP:NOTBATTLE. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 00:13, 18 September 2014 (UTC) Note: User:Mardochee1:...

start editing YEC-related topics, to fight any battles. You violate WP:NOTBATTLE by adding blatantly biased info into WP articles like the false claim...

and an explanation how these edits violate it [1] violates WP:NPA WP:NOTBATTLE on two users, specially this quote attacking a third party mediator (not...

brought up WP:IDHT and WP:FOC to the discussion, I think a reminder of WP:NOTBATTLE is appropriate now that we're at ANI over terminology. --Ronz (talk) 17:14...

edit-warring before reporting Phil Bridger for "abusive behavior." Per WP:NOTBATTLE he/she really needs to chill. HouseOfChange (talk) 22:01, 6 September...

infringement" as reasoning for the reversion. You breached TOS, WP:AGF, WP:NOTBATTLE. @Quetstar: Anyways. I would highly appreciate it if admins or other editors...

appropriate. Thanks. Jack | talk page 17:08, 30 October 2016 (UTC) WP:NOTBATTLE I am discussing my opinions on the above user's AfD which I believe is...

summarily reverted. [262] - this edit in particular is in violation of WP:NOTBATTLE, and Til's mentality is not that which should be expected of a Wikipedian...

as unrelenting as it is bizarre. The violation of WP:NOTADVOCATE, WP:NOTBATTLE, WP:POINT, WP:DISRUPT, ... is quite clear by now. --Joy [shallot] (talk)...

block is unwarranted or no longer appropriate." And see WP:NOTLAW, WP:NOTBATTLE NE Ent 02:19, 5 May 2014 (UTC) DePiep, any time you want to stop acting...

technicalities in Wikipedia to go around consensus, violating WP:NOTCENSOR, WP:NOTBATTLE, possibly even WP:DE. Many people trust Wikipedia to present historically...

keep it. Bearian (talk) 03:29, 14 May 2011 (UTC) P.S. Please read WP:NOTBATTLE. Bearian (talk) 03:50, 14 May 2011 (UTC) Read WP:ADMIN and WP:AFD. Also...

digging dirt on other people only makes the dirt digger look bad. WP:NOTBATTLE, so cut it out. 46.62.142.76 (talk) 07:41, 19 October 2014 (UTC) This...

sign of intending to stop" is another baseless accusation by you. See WP:NOTBATTLE.--Ubikwit 連絡 見学/迷惑 12:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC) (edit conflict) You seem...

both the letter and the spirit of that arbcom ruling (derived from WP:NOTBATTLE) was being followed there, it's not about winning arguments so much as...

the combative uncivil remarks that is now at the point of breaching WP:NOTBATTLE. It doesn't matter what I seem to post, he always finds fault in it that...

editor. I have no intention of WP:WAR as I believe that Wikipedia is WP:NOTBATTLE and everyone are welcome to edit. Thank you. Nuwordlife0rder (talk) 10:43...

should be discouraged. Existing policy already clearly supports this. WP:NOTBATTLE already cautions us against "nurtur[ing] prejudice, hatred, or fear."...

fact that the sanctions were a result of several issues pertaining to WP:NOTBATTLE; and that individually, my conduct had been deemed sanctionable precisely...

attacked from the outside and also has seens its share of WP:SOAP, and WP:NOTBATTLE from some users, specially Atabəy (talk · contribs) (Atabek (talk · contribs))...

Slowart is willing be banned as he still has players in the game." WP:NOTBATTLE Blackash has posted to approximately a hundred sites around the web claiming...

sight during the case, and avoided sanctions. [55] After I reply “WP:NOTBATTLE”, he thanked me and deleted offending material, then I thanked him. Then...

the cake. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 22:00, 27 April 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTBATTLE. This is clear trolling because it must be obvious to almost anyone that...

notability is about the topic not the current state of the page. Also WP:NOTBATTLE. JMWt (talk) 15:46, 30 October 2016 (UTC) Comment. There are MANY reasons...

forever on this. Speciate (talk) 18:07, 16 May 2012 (UTC) Please see WP:NOTBATTLE. The topic of a stand-alone article has to be notable, but separate notability...

irrational tone before.", posted just before your bombing here. As per WP:NOTBATTLE, I'm not going to violate it with you here, so I will not reply your editor-directed...

per WP:DISPUTE. --Mark viking (talk) 17:27, 19 February 2013 (UTC) WP:NOTBATTLE Please don't encourage farcical WP:DISPUTES. I have better things to do...

lot of local news coverage? Finally, suggest you refresh yourself on WP:NOTBATTLE. Weak keep I could not see any specific significant coverage but there...

"shalls" and exclamation points. Both you and Spartacus! need to read WP:NOTBATTLE. --NeilN talk to me 15:09, 24 July 2016 (UTC) you are only producing wp:or...

for those he likes WP:NOTADVOCATE, and to attack those he does not WP:NOTBATTLE. A permanent community ban has been imposed on User:David r from meth...

2011 (UTC) Endorse (edit conflict) x2 Wikipedia is not a battleground WP:NOTBATTLE. The original decision clearly satisfies speedy keep (WP:SK) as a procedural...

it represents the POV of the Russian government. I think it reaches WP:NOTBATTLE at points, and is highly counterproductive. As for a concrete example...

2011 (UTC) Endorse (edit conflict) x2 Wikipedia is not a battleground WP:NOTBATTLE. The original decision clearly satisfies speedy keep (WP:SK) as a procedural...

was shot up.--WaltCip (talk) 17:17, 16 December 2012 (UTC) Easy now. WP:NOTBATTLE & WP:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. Looking at some of...

however, used Wikipedia as a battleground, which is a violation of WP:NOTBATTLE.--115.52.9.253 (talk) 06:42, 7 July 2018 (UTC) Please get better at the...

new chapter as far as I'm concerned, but we can go there. Remember, WP:NOTBATTLE.--Ubikwit 連絡 見学/迷惑 02:57, 23 May 2014 (UTC) @Ubikwit: "The tone ... incomprehensible...

to make it consistent. Gaijin42 (talk) 01:47, 5 November 2011 (UTC) WP:NOTBATTLE. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 02:01, 5 November 2011 (UTC) As Gaijin has pointed...

WP:DR (especially the lede and the "Avoiding disputes" section), and WP:NOTBATTLE. Finally, the focus here should be on how to be more civil and how to...

WP:DONTNEEDIMAGE "not a reason" WP:IDONTLIKEIT "not a game/battle" WP:NOTBATTLE "not telling" WP:USELESS "does not expand the knowledge of the subject"...

for deletion, but I support WP:ATD for the sake of WP:CONSENSUS and WP:NOTBATTLE. It's good to find alternatives that build common ground. Shooterwalker...

(talk) 03:51, 17 February 2026 (UTC) "anti-American", good grief. WP:NOTBATTLE, WP:PA and on and on. For god's sake this is ITN. Please hold those horses...