DOKUMEN123.COM

contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article or a Wikipedia policy, as it has not been reviewed by the community. Shortcut WP:NORACISTSWP:NORACISTS...

already endorsed by several users; currently, more users support it than WP:NORACISTS. I hope that it will enjoy far greater support over time, and that it...

To quote myself in an accidental second nomination of the page: Per WP:NORACISTS. I found this one while checking another MfD, and was baffled. LilianaUwU...

Neo-Confederate garbage. Curbon7 (talk) 07:00, 29 September 2022 (UTC) Delete: WP:NORACISTS. Easy vote. Lmharding (talk) 08:12, 29 September 2022 (UTC) Speedy delete...

that are perceived as racist. Our tolerance for this should (essay: WP:NORACISTS) be low. CT55555 (talk) 13:30, 11 May 2022 (UTC) Adding a third (basically...

Racist (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)​ Per WP:NORACISTS. I found this one while checking another MfD, and was baffled. LilianaUwU...

(they/it) 05:29, 15 July 2023 (UTC) Delete per nom, WP:NONAZIS and WP:NORACISTS (among others). There must be zero tolerance towards Holocaust denial...

02:13, 20 March 2026 (UTC) Delete and would support a block as well. WP:NORACISTS and WP:NONAZIS. Seems like this user's non-userspace contributions are...

by aligning oneself with a hate movement. The essays WP:NONAZIS and WP:NORACISTS discuss this, but both make their conclusions sound more radical than...

mentioned. —Sundostund (talk) 22:06, 20 April 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:NORACISTS, or at best “substantially divisive” per WP:UBX. Seems like an unnecessary...

fundamentally changed since then. (By the way, it is worth noting that WP:NORACISTS is an essay, not policy; so as justification for deletion it at best can...

16:56, 2 September 2022 (UTC) Delete as per the arguments presented in WP:NORACISTS and WP:HATESPEECH. The Confederate battle flag has been identified as...

and show queerphobes the door. This essay and sister essays such as WP:NORACISTS, WP:NOCONFED, and WP:NONAZIS face a common criticism: "we should sanction...

should be made to this discussion. Please check his edit summary[336]. WP:NORACISTS — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hsynylmztr (talk • contribs) 17:14...

a knee-jerk threat. Dronebogus (talk) 02:27, 31 January 2022 (UTC) WP:NORACISTS, I would imagine. Jumping immediately to WP:BOOMERANG over a user pushing...

appropriate remedy in such a case is an indefinite block per WP:NOTHERE and WP:NORACISTS. The evidence presented against this user in that regard is compelling...

count as WP:RACISTBELIEFS? And shouldn't racists be indeff blocked per WP:NORACISTS?--SharabSalam (talk) 10:57, 21 December 2019 (UTC) This user has been...

(Talk/Edits) 20:09, 9 November 2020 (UTC) Possibly related further reading: WP:NORACISTS. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). 02:43,...

bludgeoning Based on this evidence I’d say this user runs foul of WP:NORACISTS due to their unequivocal support for a racist conspiracy theory. They...

changes aside from the insertion of said slur. Requesting a block per WP:NORACISTS. Heyitsstevo (talk) 09:35, 13 August 2020 (UTC) Heyitsstevo - This editor...

attempted POV editing. At this point it might be appropriate to cite WP:NORACISTS as well. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 04:33, 3 March 2019 (UTC) The examples cited...

non-existent revolts is a common form of Armenian Genocide denial. Per WP:NORACISTS, this was a strong indicator that Solavirum is WP:NOTHERE. Less than a...

endorsement than for WP:NORACISTS, which is currently endorsed by three users. Can that number be seen as an indicator that WP:NORACISTS isn't relevant? Of...

also by far the most well-known and oft-cited. TonyBallioni moved WP:NORACISTS from another user's userspace into project space in 2021 for reasons that...

that are perceived as racist. Our tolerance for this should (essay: WP:NORACISTS) be low. CT55555 (talk) 13:30, 11 May 2022 (UTC) Adding a third (basically...

a more general version of more specific essays such as WP:NONAZIS, WP:NORACISTS, WP:NOCONFED, and WP:NOQUEERPHOBES. WP:NONAZIS especially makes it very...

and show queerphobes the door. This essay and sister essays such as WP:NORACISTS, WP:NOCONFED, and WP:NONAZIS face a common criticism: "we should sanction...

WaltClipper -(talk) 19:31, 6 February 2023 (UTC) WP:NOCONFED, WP:NONAZIS and WP:NORACISTS are all dealing with the same, gravely serious issue. There are no "mild"/acceptable...

concurrent to the discrediting of Russophilic ideologies, a section in WP:NORACISTS states that racists generally believes in That their culture is superior...

like there is any CTOP restriction on UK politics. The closest is WP:NORACISTS, which is just an essay. Anyways, it seems the system is working well...

who display unabashed bigotry, then the only thing stopping NONAZIS, NORACISTS, NOQUEERPHOBIA etc from being a policy/guideline rather than an essay...

like there is any CTOP restriction on UK politics. The closest is WP:NORACISTS, which is just an essay. Anyways, it seems the system is working well...

--Rschen7754 02:49, 3 April 2023 (UTC) Support screams WP:CIR and WP:NORACISTS, especially considering this is an admin we’re talking about, who are...

white-washing an article about a prominent alt-right white-nationalist. Per WP:NORACISTS & WP:NONAZIS, I'd support a ban here. Nil🥝 05:01, 2 November 2025 (UTC)...

these should go straight to revdel, honestly. And I'll add a link to WP:NORACISTS (while not a policy, still an important thing to have in mind when editing...

similar (I do believe the line should be firmly drawn at WP:NONAZIS, WP:NORACISTS and people whose views are in contradiction of WP:CHILDPROTECT, of course...

and WP:WIKILAWYERing, made worse by the given POV the editor pushes (WP:NORACISTS comes to mind here) (EDIT: striking this preemptively, as it's uncomfortably...

who display unabashed bigotry, then the only thing stopping NONAZIS, NORACISTS, NOQUEERPHOBIA etc from being a policy/guideline rather than an essay...

underlying policies instead of a political essay like WP:NONAZIS or WP:NORACISTS or WP:HATEDISRUPT. JM (talk) 23:20, 14 November 2023 (UTC) Those essays...

this discussion. Kakar32 is a case of WP:NOTHERE and is violating WP:NORACISTS.[18] Azuredivay (talk) 13:53, 21 July 2025 (UTC) That also probably needs...

problematic much in the same way that making something like WP:NOCONFED or WP:NORACISTS a policy would be, which is that it's partially redundant but could also...

severely uncivilistic behaviour, and the grossest you can do to break WP:NORACISTS, insulting multiple people. A talk page note was afterwards added by another...

WP:HATEDISRUPT WP:HATESPEECH WP:HID Usage of slurs like this promote racism WP:NORACISTS Use of slurs and epithets are among Wikipedia's Zero Tolerance edits WP:ZT...