DOKUMEN123.COM

Wikipedia is not working to a deadline, though it is not an excuse for complacency. There are various points of view on what this lack of a deadline means...

exactly the kind of stub that will grow into a good article in time, per WP:NODEADLINE. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:50, 28 July...

from mainspace. —SpacemanSpiff 19:38, 29 August 2015 (UTC) Keep per WP:NODEADLINE and WP:NOHARM There are several [Category:Inactive WikiProject] and [Category:Defunct...

was written. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:55, 17 July 2019 (UTC) Keep per WP:NODEADLINE. ——SerialNumber54129 08:22, 17 July 2019 (UTC) YESDEADLINE for fringe...

before deciding whether the article is really eligible for deletion. WP:NODEADLINE is an argument often used in AfD to keep unimproved articles that have...

from mainspace. —SpacemanSpiff 19:40, 29 August 2015 (UTC) Keep per WP:NODEADLINE and WP:NOHARM There are several [Category:Inactive WikiProject] and [Category:Defunct...

as with similar articles about Danish Olympians. There is after all WP:NODEADLINE. I must add that I thought Liz's previous Keep closure was correct: I...

articles in my user space. Please close discussion and retain article. WP:NODEADLINE. Valoem talk contrib 18:30, 27 December 2017 (UTC) Keep—per Valoem. Nikolaiho☎️📖...

Releases in a week, too soon would be if it started filming in a week. WP:NODEADLINE so stub quantity of information doesn't make it unencyclopedic. I haven't...

copies of articles for preparing improvements is normal. There is WP:NODEADLINE that says these improvements should be done in a week. – SD0001 (talk)...

here negate the prod template already there? If so, Wp:CRYSTAL and Wp:NODEADLINE both apply here (and besides, we don't have a huge article for the South...

appearance fails WP:BLP1E. For a person whose first name is unknown, WP:NODEADLINE is being stretched; it appears NEVER. Rhadow (talk) 14:31, 1 October 2017...

violation, this situation would be analogous to the reasoning of the essay WP:NODEADLINE and the policy WP:PRESERVE. 24.151.116.12 (talk) 16:33, 15 February 2018...

and MI:8 may not be a thing in 2022. Shocking, I know!). WP:TOOSOON, WP:NODEADLINE, WP:CHILL (happy to know that one exists!). Nate • (chatter) 04:38, 19...

consensus was to merge, just no one made the effort to do so. Per WP:NODEADLINE, there should be no rush to either. The page should not be entirely deleted...

tagged for improvement is not a valid rationale for deletion, see WP:NODEADLINE and WP:NOTCLEANUP. There's also a fair bit of coverage, see: NYTimes profile...

articles in my user space. Please close discussion and retain article. WP:NODEADLINE. Valoem talk contrib 18:31, 27 December 2017 (UTC) Delete - This has sat...

something as well. I appreciate you want a consensus, but remember WP:NODEADLINE, and that there is absolutely no need to rush into deleting this. Five...

articles in my user space. Please close discussion and retain article. WP:NODEADLINE. Valoem talk contrib 18:29, 27 December 2017 (UTC) Delete - This has sat...

Legacypac (talk) 17:50, 12 February 2019 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD and WP:NODEADLINE. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 19:16, 12 February 2019 (UTC) Comment - The topic...

a talk page post and give other editors time to make improvements; WP:NODEADLINE. ~Kvng (talk) 21:45, 18 June 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

after it was created. I generally disapprove of this practice per WP:NODEADLINE, as I feel editors should be given time to flesh out the article and add...

Randykitty (talk) 18:18, 21 January 2022 (UTC) Delete WP:TOOSOON WP:NODEADLINE -- rsjaffe 🗩 🖉 18:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

articles in my user space. Please close discussion and retain article. WP:NODEADLINE. Valoem talk contrib 18:30, 27 December 2017 (UTC) Delete - This has sat...

drafts, no reason not to wait another ten years or so and check again. WP:NODEADLINE 107.72.99.213 (talk) 21:27, 3 April 2016 (UTC) If the company is out of...

Unscintillating (talk) 23:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC) Keep per WP:PRESERVE and WP:NODEADLINE. The information in this draft comes from reliable sources, and would...

regarding SNG RfCs it would require a fair amount of workshopping first and a NODEADLINE attitude. Vaticidalprophet 14:24, 3 July 2021 (UTC) Comment - I thank...

expanded on Wikipedia is not a reason to delete it: this isn't a BLP, WP:NODEADLINE still applies.--Arxiloxos (talk) 17:45, 29 December 2010 (UTC) Keep per...

articles in my user space. Please close discussion and retain article. WP:NODEADLINE. Valoem talk contrib 18:31, 27 December 2017 (UTC) Umm, "I am allowed...

league team does not have presumed notability per any SNG. There is WP:NODEADLINE - we can wait to have an article on this team until notability is more...

existence. "No one is interested enough to write it up" != "not notable". WP:NODEADLINE and all that jazz. I'm not an aficionado of amateur mycology myself, so...

purpose to at least the people who edited it. See alsp WP:VOLUNTEER and WP:NODEADLINE regarding your concern that no one will maintain it. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney"...

html surely? --Oscarthecat (talk) 06:45, 13 August 2009 (UTC) Delete. WP:NODEADLINE applies only if the article is merely poorly written, rather than a copyright...

to hard-copy sources unavailable online. WP:IMPERFECT WP:NOTCLEANUP WP:NODEADLINE Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 00:22, 4 March 2013 (UTC) The above discussion is...

Japanese language reference, but did not provide one. I understand WP:NODEADLINE. This is looking like NEVER. Fails WP:V. Rhadow (talk) 13:41, 7 November...

and the lack of clarity over into what article it would be merged. WP:NODEADLINE strikes me as applying here - nothing stopping it being reviewed again...

2017 (UTC) There is any number of Gnomes that will do it, there is WP:NODEADLINE. Consider that when I authored this almost 10 years ago it was still very...

2603:8001:2902:64F4:7C17:B0FA:1D89:8AE7 (talk) 02:23, 1 January 2023 (UTC) Please see WP:NODEADLINE. Wikipedia's processes do not follow external deadlines, as DoubleGrazing...

sources exist. The need to provide the sources has been met; after that WP:NODEADLINE applies. That said, the list isn't actually complete. When a TOTP producer...

DGG ( talk ) 23:16, 31 May 2010 (UTC) It is not acceptable to use WP:NODEADLINE as a means of dodging WP:BURDEN indefinitely. Policy states that material...

can be improved. Slow progress, also not a valid reason to delete (WP:NODEADLINE). We should be focused on the notability of the subject. Her work has...

happen earlier this year. WP:TOOSOON, WP:CRYSTALBALL, WP:NOTE, and WP:NODEADLINE —Farix (t | c) 21:12, 6 July 2018 (UTC) With all due respect, you're kind...

mass-created and are lacking in specific content but, bearing in mind WP:NODEADLINE, why do we need to delete them? Are they not verifiable? Not notable?...

illegitimate per WP:DEL-REASON, WP:BEFORE, and WP:NEXIST. I would also cite WP:NODEADLINE and WP:NOTCLEANUP. The proper thing is to try to improve the article first...

WP:STALEDRAFT JMHamo (talk) 01:02, 16 March 2014 (UTC) KeepMerge per WP:NODEADLINE and it has been submitted to AfC for review. — {{U|Technical 13}} (t •...

there for over 3 years (in case the slow progress here bothers anyone, WP:NODEADLINE). ~Kvng (talk) 01:41, 16 June 2016 (UTC) User:Kvng, look - this time I...

years old as long as there is work being done on it, it can stay. WP:NODEADLINE applies to this rationale. The images have no bearing on the draft and...

draftification. But their lack of action, along with their quote of the "WP:NODEADLINE" essay when the subject came up, suggests they consider their userspace...

(UTC) This is not a good deletion rationale. See WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:NODEADLINES. ~Kvng (talk) 21:56, 4 August 2022 (UTC) If I had said "Unless this deletion...

that should be reserved for the most egregious examples. Thus, per WP:NODEADLINES, I'd just say, why not wait for a WP:CSD#G13? Draft: namespace isn't...

of the article is not a valid WP:DELREASON. As said above, there is WP:NODEADLINE. The article is reasonably sourced and can be salvaged with editing as...

FloridaArmy (talk) 17:40, 4 March 2018 (UTC) Keep WP:DEMOLISH attempted. WP:NODEADLINES. A WP:TROUT for apparent WP:BEFORE violation. ~Kvng (talk) 18:00, 5 March...

cocktails is not currently in a state to accept that content, but there is WP:NODEADLINE and the article can stay up until the list is converted into such a state...

their own. But even there, I think deletion would cause harm, cf. WP:NODEADLINE. --BDD (talk) 20:58, 8 January 2015 (UTC) Discussing these as a group...

(UTC) Why are you in such a hurry? 2018 has not even started yet. See WP:NODEADLINE Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:21, 17 December 2017 (UTC) Skdwived (talk ·...

easily be included in Superannuation in Australia. However, there is WP:NODEADLINE, and WP:IMPATIENT is one of the arguments to avoid in deletion discussions...

or merge. Maintenance templates aren't a rationale for deletion per WP:NODEADLINE but this is a pretty clear failure of GNG and is essay-like. Some references...

appearance fails WP:BLP1E. For a person whose first name is unknown, WP:NODEADLINE is being stretched; it appears NEVER. Rhadow (talk) 14:23, 4 October 2017...

30 May 2022 (UTC) Keep. Lists needn't be complete. Wikipedia has WP:NODEADLINE. gidonb (talk) 06:51, 31 May 2022 (UTC) The list fails WP:LISTN as a topic...

Josh Milburn (talk) 08:45, 4 July 2016 (UTC) AfD is not for cleanup. WP:NODEADLINE. WP:DEMOLISH. If the mess upsets you, please take the initiative to either...

there is no lack of sources. So keep per WP:NEXIST, WP:ORGDEPTH, and WP:NODEADLINE. Nomination seems to imply that there is a deadline. gidonb (talk) 14:29...

(UTC) Oookay then. JMWt (talk) 15:13, 28 April 2025 (UTC) Keep per WP:NODEADLINES. We can re-assess notability once the dust settles but all of Iberia...

target audience. Thanks all again for your patience. I may have taken WP:NODEADLINE a bit too much to heart here. But I hope you find the article improved...

editors are better at creating lists than writing prose. Still, there is WP:NODEADLINE to complete the article.—Bagumba (talk) 05:46, 6 January 2017 (UTC) Move...

way to live on an WP:VOLUNTEER project. See also WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:NODEADLINES. ~Kvng (talk) 17:49, 17 March 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

Possibly WP:TOOSOON, but it can always be deleted later if need be per WP:NODEADLINE, and draftifying will allow editors with an interest in the subject to...

the poor presentation of the information in the article, but there's WP:NODEADLINE, and the extensive list present may be useful to someone intending to...

help other editors find references. Please remember that there is WP:NODEADLINE. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC) @AustralianRupert:...

editors to AfD within moments of article creation, and the sidelining of WP:NODEADLINE, I think giving a user time to work on something is beneficial, especially...

cleanup (WP:NOTCLEANUP). I would also add that there's no deadline here (WP:NODEADLINE). One step that can be taken to encourage speedier improvements/rewrites...

good day!RoseSophie555 (talk) 11:54, 28 September 2023 (UTC) There is NODEADLINE. If sources don't exist now, when will they? You can always recreate the...

policy pages. There are also numerous essays on this subject; see WP:NODEADLINE and WP:DEMOLISH for example. JulesH (talk) 15:49, 23 March 2009 (UTC)...

and if and when content is found the sections can be recreated. IMO WP:NODEADLINE (an essay) doesn't apply to this. Miniapolis 16:05, 17 February 2017 (UTC)...

2604:2000:8FC0:4:68BA:3B32:8613:8B6D (talk) 16:42, 23 January 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NODEADLINES and not to be BITEy and wait for the WP:CSD#G13 clock to run its course...

appearance fails WP:BLP1E. For a player whose first name is unknown, WP:NODEADLINE is being stretched; it appears NEVER. Indika played in one match, for...

as a weak navigational list), but there's room for improvement, and WP:NODEADLINE applies here. Claritas § 18:56, 13 July 2010 (UTC) The above discussion...

and pointy at the worst. Hasteur (talk) 03:01, 13 June 2018 (UTC) WP:NODEADLINE. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 03:03, 13 June 2018 (UTC) Glad you agree with my view...

in the future." Several "keep" arguments are based on WP:EFFORT or WP:NODEADLINE without specifying an actual reason for retention. On a side note, there...

discussions. North America1000 23:40, 30 August 2017 (UTC) Keep per 1) WP:NODEADLINE, 2) because these articles actually do contain more content compared to...

cleanup. Smartyllama (talk) 00:57, 28 June 2018 (UTC) Keep There is WP:NODEADLINE and there is significant coverage of crime levels in individual US states...

article by searching for sources.  Six months is not "forever", there is wp:nodeadline at Wikipedia, and wp:stale draft is not applicable to such a recently-incubated...

right now; maybe in another decade better sources will exist, per WP:NODEADLINE. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:19, 14 March 2022 (UTC) If you haven't yet been...

any case, the topic clearly meets WP:GNG - plenty of coverage. Per WP:NODEADLINE, short stubs which define a topic are preferable to no coverage at all...

event more than a run-of-the-mill killing. Ultimately, since there's WP:NODEADLINE, I think that at this juncture it makes sense to keep and circle back...

developing this article is not a valid reason to support deleting it. WP:NODEADLINES WP:NOTCLEANUP. ~Kvng (talk) 13:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC) Keep – using...

three crewmembers, in addition to the helmsman. And while there is WP:NODEADLINE, there is also no deadline for us to have a deadline - would you be willing...

repair-deficiency disorder.Novangelis (talk) 13:12, 19 May 2012 (UTC) Keep per WP:NODEADLINE. This list has the potential to be quite valuable. The objections listed...

of fresh air is always welcome, you would be well advised to read WP:NODEADLINE and temper your urge to complete things as quickly as possible. MBisanz...

appearance fails WP:BLP1E. For a person whose first name is unknown, WP:NODEADLINE is being stretched; it appears NEVER. Rhadow (talk) 20:50, 6 October 2017...

Spyke 18:39, 20 December 2008 (UTC) Keep and troutslap nominator. WP:NODEADLINE, WP:NOT#PAPER, Wikipedia:Notability (high schools). Adequate sources for...

paragraph or a few sentences about the group. For No. 1, there is WP:NODEADLINE, so the fact that "a lot of work" is required is not a reason to not include...

--Dweller (talk) 19:52, 30 June 2010 (UTC) Keep - notable concept. Per WP:NODEADLINE, the appalling state of the article really isn't a justification to delete...

paragraph or a few sentences about the group. For No. 1, there is WP:NODEADLINE, so the fact that "a lot of work" is required is not a reason to not include...

our problem. There is no deadline related to an album release (see WP:NODEADLINE) and we couldn't care less about your desire to promote these new recordings...

be there 8D. Nsae Comp (talk) 21:31, 5 January 2022 (UTC) @Trovatore:, not *yet*, you mean. WP:NODEADLINE. Mathglot (talk) 21:43, 5 January 2022 (UTC)...

a Rhetorical response, he is making an unverifiable assertion, see WP:NODEADLINE --Natet/c 17:14, 25 May 2010 (UTC) Given the sources (or lack thereof)...

but these improvements can be handled outside AfD - WP:NOTCLEANUP, WP:NODEADLINES. ~Kvng (talk) 15:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

potential size (48 in this case), not the current size, because of WP:NODEADLINE. Here's where these categories are useful: say you wanted to tackle setting...

whilst this TfD is ongoing, as they may just get deleted anyway. Also, WP:NODEADLINE applies. There seems to be support for keeping and reworking these and...

didn't see Barkeep's keep statement - I will let the AFD proceed as usual. NODEADLINE and all that. Primefac (talk) 01:39, 6 May 2019 (UTC) Note: since the...

standalone BLPs. Bearcat (talk) 23:46, 29 August 2017 (UTC) Wrong. See WP:NODEADLINE. Smartyllama (talk) 12:51, 30 August 2017 (UTC) That's a user essay, not...

the game itself can be a source. and lists tend to stay incomplete WP:NODEADLINE. Unlike the lists we are discussing, there is absolutely zero hope List...

what may happen in the meantime. Are you sure it won't exist? Wikipedia:NODEADLINE#View_two. --AuthorityTam (talk) 14:12, 25 June 2009 (UTC) Having over...

maintenance tags on it and keep it for now per WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:NODEADLINES. ~Kvng (talk) 15:13, 21 October 2023 (UTC) Can you find evidence that...

WP:VOLUNTEERS here and WP:NODEADLINES applies to most everything we do. ~Kvng (talk) 14:12, 20 March 2018 (UTC) WP:NODEADLINES does not apply to brand new...

basis of It has been a "WIP" for nearly a month now. is a violation of NODEADLINE. {{Infobox user script}} wouldn't apply to gadgets, toolserver/labs tools...

that is of higher priority? If it is too important to let the normal WP:NODEADLINE approach work, then the FOUNDATION or WikiMedia or some other higher level...

George Cross. As for writing the articles: I intend to write some, but WP:NODEADLINE applies. Still no reason to delete. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk...

should be removing sourced content from this article, and there is WP:NODEADLINE for this article to be updated. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)...

the article's talk page (or even just make your own WP:BOLD edits). WP:NODEADLINE is an important rule on Wiki so I wouldn't be concerned about not having...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Deprodded per WP:NODEADLINES, but if an article goes EIGHT YEARS without a single edit, I think it...

administrative capacity in this matter. Also, please be patient. There is WP:NODEADLINE, so saying something needs to happen "by next week" or "today" is a breach...

inactivity can be easily restored upon request. Wikipedia runs on WP:NODEADLINE so keep that in mind. S0091 (talk) 22:24, 20 December 2022 (UTC) @Prof...

know the person's first name and haven't since 2009. I understand WP:NODEADLINE. In this case it seems to mean NEVER. Rhadow (talk) 21:47, 30 September...

arguments can be discounted, on the basis of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and WP:NODEADLINE. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:29, 24 February...

effort to keep up to date.: completeness is not a requirement, there's WP:NODEADLINE. SD0001 (talk) 05:07, 28 August 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:LISTPURPOSE being...

2019 (UTC) I like the answer to question 9, shows an appreciation for WP:NODEADLINE which makes for good decisions like those in the answer to question 6...

maintainers. Makes perfect sense, really. See also WP:IMPERFECT AND WP:NODEADLINE. Fact is, I could overhaul this portal in around one to two hours and...

only do one thing at a time, but the issue has my attention. There is WP:NODEADLINE. TimothyJosephWood 02:11, 6 July 2016 (UTC) You literally accused editors...

September 2016 (UTC) OK, let's merge both articles. Again, there's WP:NODEADLINE. Who does this? (I don't know how to. And also, how do you squeeze a 22kB...

of edits and then straight to ANI is not collaborative. As we have WP:NODEADLINE, we can take time to discuss and get it right. Slywriter (talk) 18:30...

so. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 16:43, 2 June 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NODEADLINE. There is no harm but only potential benefit in retaining this draft....

so that the redir has somewhere appropriate to go. In the interim (WP:NODEADLINE), redlinking encourages content work to make the red go blue. And if this...

and manufacturers, so these will get completed in the future. See WP:NODEADLINE. If this box is deleted then it will just have to be recreated as more...

is this merge proposed but not ..." Because WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and WP:NODEADLINE. But you are as free as anyone to propose such a merger. Andy Mabbett...

effort to keep up to date: completeness is not a requirement, there's WP:NODEADLINE. SD0001 (talk) 05:07, 28 August 2020 (UTC) Keep LISTN is clearly met,...

that. It's not about who's version is the live version of the page (WP:NODEADLINE). As you have reverted four times it is pretty clear you have engaged...

some "don't rush to delete this very second" options, including IAR, NODEADLINE, INDISCRIMINATE (and the implications it has for merging when stand-alone...

world has yet to end. There are no BLP or COPYVIO issue. Please see WP:NODEADLINE. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:27, 16 January 2019 (UTC) That's not how BRD...

unwilling to let it go - even though it is not encyclopedic. WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NODEADLINE, and WP:RSBREAKING has been pointed out to him. Discussion has started...

article without being started over from zero with what's there. And yes, WP:NODEADLINE is a thing but at some point you have to question if it's better to let...

re-listed (observe all the re-listed articles on today's AFD page). WP:NODEADLINE is a important philosophical point, if only one expressed in an essay...

NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 18:58, 20 February 2014 (UTC) Again, why the hurry? WP:NODEADLINE. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:11, 20 February 2014 (UTC) Again...

technicality, is frowned upon. They have been directed to the essay WP:NODEADLINE, and when it comes to specific policy guidance on this issue, Jd22292...

them all up. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:02, 17 July 2016 (UTC) WP:NODEADLINE, but they are being worked on and the job would go a lot quicker if there...

make changes to NSPORTS, regardless of how "unanimous" they seem. WP:NODEADLINE. Natg 19 (talk) 21:37, 14 March 2022 (UTC) There may be no deadline, but...

would be highly visible and wouldn't be worth the disruption. Also, WP:NODEADLINE applies here. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 14:59, 24 December 2009...

WP - you open a thread, and others take it somewhere else. There is WP:NODEADLINE here and we can turn back and address the specific source once the broader...

lists and hopefully, in time, improve them -- as of course we have WP:NODEADLINE (just an essay, but one which I agree with). Shawn in Montreal (talk)...

because the relevant essay is WP:NODEADLINE. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:59, 1 January 2021 (UTC) WP:NODEADLINE is a great essay, but it's not a...

reviews in print and therefore notability. These are not BLPs and so, per NODEADLINE, there is absolutely nothing wrong, per policy, in creating such articles...

I consider it useful research. It's progressing slowly but I have WP:NODEADLINE.). As the data on that page demonstrates most users agree that area needs...

Bushranger One ping only 22:52, 9 August 2012 (UTC) And what exactly does WP:NODEADLINE have to do with the time it takes for one user to respond to a direct...

entire page on lockdown? B_Maximus (talk) 16:01, 6 December 2020 (UTC) WP:NODEADLINE may be relevant here (and possibly also WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS). - The Bushranger...

but it wasn't required that Ritchie himself perform that task, per WP:NODEADLINE. Waggie (talk) 03:47, 19 October 2019 (UTC) Endorse Thryduulf's unblock...

further edits should be made to this discussion. Not an AN matter, there is NODEADLINE and unless it's snowing at the RM, it's unlikely to be closed before the...

nothing else, he should be strongly encouraged to slow the hell down. WP:NODEADLINE and whatnot. The block, I think, was justified to allow that message to...

middle ground to accommodate those of us who are extremely grateful for WP:NODEADLINE. Thanks for hearing me out. I am here when I can be here because I think...

NOTNEWS, and can be added at any time its significance is established per NODEADLINE. Even then, an RS would need to establish that Islamist extremism was...

actively working on an article, leave the content issues to them (because WP:NODEADLINE), and just focus on making sure that everyone is getting their voice heard...

suffer sanctions.Nishidani (talk) 12:00, 12 July 2016 (UTC) So much for WP:NODEADLINE. EEng 14:13, 12 July 2016 (UTC) But... there is a deadline... WP:DEADLINENOW...

latter—had been followed today, we would not be in this situation. And per WP:NODEADLINE, that an issue has been problematic for too long does not override the...

suffer sanctions.Nishidani (talk) 12:00, 12 July 2016 (UTC) So much for WP:NODEADLINE. EEng 14:13, 12 July 2016 (UTC) But... there is a deadline... WP:DEADLINENOW...

particularly burdensome. As for whether it can even be completed, I think WP:NODEADLINE covers that. If the templates had actually been applied to summaries that...

standard length to get more input before it is closed - there is no WP:NODEADLINE and it is clearly a sensitive issue. Jytdog (talk) 14:29, 19 June 2015...

18:06, 1 May 2018 (UTC) No. 3 seems good in principle, but in practice WP:NODEADLINE is a thing to consider and currently there is no policy which allows for...

interpretation of WP:NOTWEBHOST contradicts some interpretation of WP:NODEADLINE. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 05:16, 27 August 2017 (UTC) Should the WP:PORN...

editors' wishes should be reflected as soon as feasible. I love to cite WP:NODEADLINE, but not here. Allowing editors to make their desired change immediately...

is right, the citation format is subordinate to content, even in a GA. NODEADLINE applies, although it's best not to leave the article with a mixed citation...

I'd say it comes down to "reasonable time frames". On the one hand, WP:NODEADLINE - it's not an issue if a discussion doens't happen immediately; the article...

hour, enforcing admin banned three editors and extending a topic ban WP:NODEADLINE. Thank you. 1 and 4 appear to relate to the prior topic ban extension...

is a minor part of a non-policy essay. Why not try WP:NOTPAPER and WP:NODEADLINE. μηδείς (talk) 22:45, 6 June 2011 (UTC) The problem is that all of these...

The AFD would be (and was) closed when an admin got to it. There is WP:NODEADLINE and the AFD queue appears to be significantly backlogged currently. (Threads...

wider community discussion of the issues raised in good faith above WP:NODEADLINE. Thank you. Hugh (talk) 20:47, 8 November 2015 (UTC) First, the topic...

does not rectify that issue. nableezy - 14:11, 3 December 2021 (UTC) WP:NODEADLINE seems to be relevant here. If it takes a few days to conduct a new RFC...

not the most well developed at the moment, but WP:SURMOUNTABLE and WP:NODEADLINE. AfD is not the right place for a reckoning for any notable character...

deletion should not be used to impose a deadline. Equally, neither should WP:NODEADLINE be used as a way to dodge content policies indefinitely. Reyk YO! 07:15...

scope_creepTalk 15:10, 17 December 2022 (UTC) Scope creep, There is WP:NODEADLINE for creating articles, and no deadline for deleting them. we have time...

think either is screwed. Blueboar (talk) 00:17, 7 August 2020 (UTC) WP:NODEADLINE. We will be. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits...

information being needed during the initial release, per WP:Recentism and WP:NODEADLINE. If the information isn’t going to be needed years after it’s off the...

putting in a lot of repetive table formatting for columns of TBD data (WP:NODEADLINE). Can this be automated? Otheriwse, do we just WP:IAR with this current...

and manufacturers, so these will get completed in the future. See WP:NODEADLINE. If this box is deleted then it will just have to be recreated as more...

already been listed at WP:ANRFC, so, no. Please be patient, there's WP:NODEADLINE and everyone who works off that list is a volunteer. Closing discussions...

you can easily renominate the same article for deletion later, and WP:NODEADLINE/WP:NOTPAPER also apply. This also gives the option to find an alternatives...

being used to force article improvements contrary to WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:NODEADLINE. If ARS results in some of those inappropriately nominated articles being...

a thing will ever happen. It suffers from the chronic problem that WP:NODEADLINE applies while virtually any omission of information is automatically a...

don't communicate in that fashion here. As for doing things ASAP, see WP:NODEADLINE. †dismas†|(talk) 14:08, 15 March 2017 (UTC) And I suppose we should ping...

2018 (UTC) Support as more in tune with the community philosophy (see WP:NODEADLINE in particular). For people who haven't had the good sense to avoid the...

draft. Second, G13 is arbitrary. 6 months means nothing (see also WP:NODEADLINE). In a nutshell, more specific deletion criteria, less G13 dragnet. Thoughts...

WP:HARVARD style. However, it's no big deal, and the changing process has WP:NODEADLINES. Eumat114 (Message) 06:45, 31 August 2020 (UTC) Support At AFC we encourage...

there is no requirement to add the citation right there and then (WP:NODEADLINE). And there is definitely no way to automatically reliably detect addition...

{{globalize}} then to rename and do nothing else with the base title (cf. WP:NODEADLINE). I propose retargeting to Court dress, unless it can be demonstrated...

similar to this one. --LiamUJ (talk) 11:29, 17 September 2019 (UTC) WP:NODEADLINE. HTH. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:01,...

who feel strongly about the issue. My feeling is to say that there's WP:NODEADLINE, and if nobody ever checks, then the RfC question is probably no longer...

Andy; Andy's edits 17:42, 19 January 2020 (UTC) Keep per Uanfala and WP:NODEADLINES. It's potentially useful in the future. --Doug Mehus T·C 21:29, 22 January...

that can properly contextualize something and be patient. There is WP:NODEADLINE. jps (talk) 15:14, 1 November 2021 (UTC) It was my read of the way the...

16:24, 14 June 2021 (UTC) @Tuctboh Please define "We". See Wikipedia:NODEADLINE I have left a comment on the draft. I smell Wikipedia:Coatrack articles...

badly-argued closure of this TfD. Six uses is not a reason for deletion, per WP:NODEADLINE. The template does not exist "to promote a particular website " and I...

WP:SNOW, then someone will usually close it pretty quickly. Remember, WP:NODEADLINE.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<  09:42, 9 January 2018 (UTC) FYI  – Pointer...

valid reason to keep. DMacks (talk) 15:37, 10 July 2020 (UTC) There is WP:NODEADLINE. If old images should be moved to Commons, then why not actually do so...

appearance fails WP:BLP1E. For a player whose first name is unknown, WP:NODEADLINE is being stretched; it appears NEVER. Indika played in one match, for...

deletion request. The article is not in that bad of shape WP:NOTCLEANUP. WP:NODEADLINES and WP:DOIT for the complaint that the article hasn't been fixed since...

of them in the New page feed each day (non-autopatrolled). There is WP:NODEADLINE to how fast the bot needs to create them all (it doesn't matter if it...

2014 (UTC) Yes, I probably should have. I know about WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NODEADLINE. I'm glad that I was able to work on the article in draft space while...

July 2016 (UTC) Oppose. Proposal does not square well with WP:AGF and WP:NODEADLINE. WP:V does not require everything to be cited. ~Kvng (talk) 15:22, 26...

is not improvement and it is not the Wikipedia way - WP:DEMOLISH, WP:NODEADLINES. ~Kvng (talk) 01:08, 15 March 2024 (UTC) I agree with your reasoning...

removed also! And there was no rush back: I'm a great believer in WP:NODEADLINE, so Gog's well-meant ping was albeit unnecessary, although appreciated...

worthwhile to work on. SilverserenC 19:34, 29 April 2011 (UTC) I think WP:NODEADLINE and the fact that Wikipedia does not have space requirements, and we shouldn't...

content, and can be fixed by improving said content, for which we have WP:NODEADLINE. It takes second to verify online that such fellowship exists, and is...

Reywas92Talk 04:13, 30 September 2022 (UTC) Keep per WP:5P2, WP:5P5, and WP:NODEADLINE. The relevant text of 5P2 says "All articles must strive for verifiable...

tag and fix articles that are poorly referenced. But, there is also WP:NODEADLINE for fixing them. It's not great that we have items unsourced, but that...

work in their favour. Doug Mehus (talk) 17:07, 26 October 2019 (UTC) WP:NODEADLINES is an important part of Wikipedia. Like most of us, I've got a lot of...

misunderstand the purpose of Wikipedia. Time is of no relevance at all WP:NODEADLINE, Wikipedia is not interested in being used to promote an auction WP:PROMO...

to List of songs recorded by Selena Gomez. It does need work, but WP:NODEADLINE and all. --BDD (talk) 20:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC) I agree with a proposed...

happen earlier this year. WP:TOOSOON, WP:CRYSTALBALL, WP:NOTE, and WP:NODEADLINE —Farix (t | c) 21:12, 6 July 2018 (UTC) With all due respect, you're kind...

"encyclopedia anyone can edit" box for me. I would oppose such a proposal per WP:NODEADLINES and WP:DEMOLISH. ~Kvng (talk) 13:20, 8 June 2022 (UTC) You can't send...

be made right now. 68.102.39.189 (talk) 21:12, 20 March 2018 (UTC) WP:NODEADLINE. You can use the article wizard at WP:YFA to create the draft yourself...

have real lives, which tend to be busy this time of year. There's wp:NODEADLINE. LeadSongDog come howl! 14:18, 22 December 2011 (UTC) @NickCT. A currently...

clarity cannot be achieved, but it should be attempted, and there is WP:NODEADLINE. The article should be collaborated on more before it's published. —Alalch...

cleaning it up. If (b), that suggest a very low priority, and thus, per WP:NODEADLINES, we've got time on our side for more potential targets to emerge. Doug...

(UTC) Anyway, the article can then be trimmed that going for an AfD. WP:NODEADLINE..The herald 15:33, 6 May 2014 (UTC) Delete and salt. No, you don't do...

free to do so yourself, otherwise someone will get to it eventually (WP:NODEADLINE). * Pppery * it has begun... 04:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC) but i dont know...

as with similar articles about Danish Olympians. There is after all WP:NODEADLINE. I must add that I thought Liz's previous Keep closure was correct: I...

main article doesn't exist yet but the key word is "yet". There is WP:NODEADLINE. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:28, 21 December 2020 (UTC) Relisted...

21:11, 16 February 2020 (UTC) Yes, we have an essay someone wrote at WP:NODEADLINES, predominantly about articles, but WP:UPNO is about userspace, and it's...

WP:NCRIC and the ten years some of these articles have gone unchallenged. WP:NODEADLINE is being used to shift the responsibility for facts from the editor to...

mass-created and are lacking in specific content but, bearing in mind WP:NODEADLINE, why do we need to delete them? Are they not verifiable? Not notable?...

administrator has spoken up in the thread, so your assertion is false. WP:NODEADLINE applies. No one gets paid here. If you want a decision, request closure...

violation, this situation would be analogous to the reasoning of the essay WP:NODEADLINE and the policy WP:PRESERVE. 24.151.116.12 (talk) 16:33, 15 February 2018...

months? After the next President is elected? Who knows? Wikipedia has WP:NODEADLINE and there is no emergency about having this topic have its own article;...

after a month or a year; this is a volunteer project, and there is WP:NODEADLINE. Deletion should happen for one of the reasons listed at WP:DEL-REASON...

Prcc27 (talk) 04:07, 17 October 2014 (UTC) It applies as much as WP:NODEADLINE, as both are essays which are the opinions of one or two editors. Just...

the game itself can be a source. and lists tend to stay incomplete WP:NODEADLINE. Unlike the lists we are discussing, there is absolutely zero hope List...

know that if he is correct, the best procedure would be to wait per WP:NODEADLINE rather than harass good editors with belligerence. 04:42, 6 June 2017...

discussions. North America1000 23:40, 30 August 2017 (UTC) Keep per 1) WP:NODEADLINE, 2) because these articles actually do contain more content compared to...

09:45, 23 September 2020 (UTC) There's a queue and a backlog. Also, WP:NODEADLINE applies, which overrides you and your clients' desire to get some spam...

effort to keep up to date: completeness is not a requirement, there's WP:NODEADLINE. SD0001 (talk) 05:07, 28 August 2020 (UTC) Keep LISTN is clearly met,...

30 May 2022 (UTC) Keep. Lists needn't be complete. Wikipedia has WP:NODEADLINE. gidonb (talk) 06:51, 31 May 2022 (UTC) The list fails WP:LISTN as a topic...

which is only start-class at the moment (we're all WP:VOLUNTEERs with WP:NODEADLINE, so not everything that could be written has been written). - Evad37 [talk]...

up? Bookku (talk) 05:19, 22 October 2020 (UTC) @Bookku: There are WP:NODEADLINES per se when it comes to editing so you can try and clean things up in...

them. I try to ease their worries by pointing them to WP:BOLD and WP:NODEADLINE, and explaining that what matters is that we have an article covering...

creating articles. The review process does takes time, but there's really WP:NODEADLINE when it comes to creating articles. Submitting the draft for review will...

WP:NCRIC and the ten years some of these articles have gone unchallenged. WP:NODEADLINE is being used to shift the responsibility for facts from the editor to...

being BOLD would be the way to go. On Wikipedia there are sort of WP:NODEADLINES, but this also doesn't mean you have to wait an excessive amount of time...

page that never should have been allowed to exist in the first place. WP:NODEADLINE is a two way road in terms of people rushing to create articles before...

Spyke 18:39, 20 December 2008 (UTC) Keep and troutslap nominator. WP:NODEADLINE, WP:NOT#PAPER, Wikipedia:Notability (high schools). Adequate sources for...

are aware of the circularity of your reasoning yourself... See also WP:NODEADLINE. --Randykitty (talk) 16:04, 17 January 2021 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

appearance fails WP:BLP1E. For a person whose first name is unknown, WP:NODEADLINE is being stretched; it appears NEVER. Rhadow (talk) 20:50, 6 October 2017...

illegitimate per WP:DEL-REASON, WP:BEFORE, and WP:NEXIST. I would also cite WP:NODEADLINE and WP:NOTCLEANUP. The proper thing is to try to improve the article first...

content claims, not the primary source of the games themselves. there is WP:NODEADLINE for us to have "the most up to the minute" information. -- TRPoD aka The...

reorganization is needed without the threat of deletion. WP:NOTCLEANUP WP:NODEADLINES. ~Kvng (talk) 18:36, 13 July 2023 (UTC) My goal with the merge suggestion...

have 99 stations in it. Raymie (t • c) 20:55, 15 December 2015 (UTC) WP:NODEADLINE and all that—it's okay if we miss a couple days. Approved for trial (first...

after it was created. I generally disapprove of this practice per WP:NODEADLINE, as I feel editors should be given time to flesh out the article and add...

delete, but feel free to debate other alternatives elsewhere". Per WP:NODEADLINE, that discussion is still pending. It sets no precedent for this discussion...

(UTC) Anyway, the article can then be trimmed that going for an AfD. WP:NODEADLINE..The herald 15:33, 6 May 2014 (UTC) Delete and salt. No, you don't do...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Deprodded per WP:NODEADLINES, but if an article goes EIGHT YEARS without a single edit, I think it...

as such. older ≠ wiser 15:23, 17 October 2015 (UTC) Disagree, sure, WP:NODEADLINE but also WP:NOTCRYSTAL, and the information we have at the moment makes...

jump into the AfC process to review such a draft. There are really WP:NODEADLINES when it comes to this type of thing, and you can continue to work on...

which is only start-class at the moment (we're all WP:VOLUNTEERs with WP:NODEADLINE, so not everything that could be written has been written). - Evad37 [talk]...

something as well. I appreciate you want a consensus, but remember WP:NODEADLINE, and that there is absolutely no need to rush into deleting this. Five...

what may happen in the meantime. Are you sure it won't exist? Wikipedia:NODEADLINE#View_two. --AuthorityTam (talk) 14:12, 25 June 2009 (UTC) Having over...

any case, the topic clearly meets WP:GNG - plenty of coverage. Per WP:NODEADLINE, short stubs which define a topic are preferable to no coverage at all...

there is no lack of sources. So keep per WP:NEXIST, WP:ORGDEPTH, and WP:NODEADLINE. Nomination seems to imply that there is a deadline. gidonb (talk) 14:29...

are aware of the circularity of your reasoning yourself... See also WP:NODEADLINE. --Randykitty (talk) 16:04, 17 January 2021 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

September 2016 (UTC) OK, let's merge both articles. Again, there's WP:NODEADLINE. Who does this? (I don't know how to. And also, how do you squeeze a 22kB...

the article's talk page (or even just make your own WP:BOLD edits). WP:NODEADLINE is an important rule on Wiki so I wouldn't be concerned about not having...

cleanup. Smartyllama (talk) 00:57, 28 June 2018 (UTC) Keep There is WP:NODEADLINE and there is significant coverage of crime levels in individual US states...

WP:VOLUNTEERs who (2) sometimes get WP:BUSY and (3) there are really WP:NODEADLINES for the most part when it comes to Wikipedia. While it's understandable...

Randykitty (talk) 18:18, 21 January 2022 (UTC) Delete WP:TOOSOON WP:NODEADLINE -- rsjaffe 🗩 🖉 18:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

here negate the prod template already there? If so, Wp:CRYSTAL and Wp:NODEADLINE both apply here (and besides, we don't have a huge article for the South...

the red links right now, that doesn't make them not notable. There's WP:NODEADLINE for that. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:38, 25 May 2023 (UTC) But what makes them...

2017 (UTC) There is any number of Gnomes that will do it, there is WP:NODEADLINE. Consider that when I authored this almost 10 years ago it was still very...

re-listed (observe all the re-listed articles on today's AFD page). WP:NODEADLINE is a important philosophical point, if only one expressed in an essay...

FloridaArmy (talk) 17:40, 4 March 2018 (UTC) Keep WP:DEMOLISH attempted. WP:NODEADLINES. A WP:TROUT for apparent WP:BEFORE violation. ~Kvng (talk) 18:00, 5 March...

a Rhetorical response, he is making an unverifiable assertion, see WP:NODEADLINE --Natet/c 17:14, 25 May 2010 (UTC) Given the sources (or lack thereof)...

page that never should have been allowed to exist in the first place. WP:NODEADLINE is a two way road in terms of people rushing to create articles before...

clarity cannot be achieved, but it should be attempted, and there is WP:NODEADLINE. The article should be collaborated on more before it's published. —Alalch...

sources exist. The need to provide the sources has been met; after that WP:NODEADLINE applies. That said, the list isn't actually complete. When a TOTP producer...

--Dweller (talk) 19:52, 30 June 2010 (UTC) Keep - notable concept. Per WP:NODEADLINE, the appalling state of the article really isn't a justification to delete...

Japanese language reference, but did not provide one. I understand WP:NODEADLINE. This is looking like NEVER. Fails WP:V. Rhadow (talk) 13:41, 7 November...

DGG ( talk ) 23:16, 31 May 2010 (UTC) It is not acceptable to use WP:NODEADLINE as a means of dodging WP:BURDEN indefinitely. Policy states that material...

reference to this on one of my user sub-pages. There is, remember, WP:NODEADLINE for this. It's notable that the various organisations listed in my evidence...

useful to alert editors how to improve it, it should remain. There's WP:NODEADLINE on improving an article. Mathglot (talk) 20:05, 17 April 2021 (UTC) Comment...

as a weak navigational list), but there's room for improvement, and WP:NODEADLINE applies here. Claritas § 18:56, 13 July 2010 (UTC) The above discussion...

exactly the kind of stub that will grow into a good article in time, per WP:NODEADLINE. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:50, 28 July...

and pointy at the worst. Hasteur (talk) 03:01, 13 June 2018 (UTC) WP:NODEADLINE. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 03:03, 13 June 2018 (UTC) Glad you agree with my view...

policy pages. There are also numerous essays on this subject; see WP:NODEADLINE and WP:DEMOLISH for example. JulesH (talk) 15:49, 23 March 2009 (UTC)...

editors are better at creating lists than writing prose. Still, there is WP:NODEADLINE to complete the article.—Bagumba (talk) 05:46, 6 January 2017 (UTC) Move...

or merge. Maintenance templates aren't a rationale for deletion per WP:NODEADLINE but this is a pretty clear failure of GNG and is essay-like. Some references...

cocktails is not currently in a state to accept that content, but there is WP:NODEADLINE and the article can stay up until the list is converted into such a state...

tagged for improvement is not a valid rationale for deletion, see WP:NODEADLINE and WP:NOTCLEANUP. There's also a fair bit of coverage, see: NYTimes profile...

lists and hopefully, in time, improve them -- as of course we have WP:NODEADLINE (just an essay, but one which I agree with). Shawn in Montreal (talk)...

Releases in a week, too soon would be if it started filming in a week. WP:NODEADLINE so stub quantity of information doesn't make it unencyclopedic. I haven't...

some Delete !voters will engage in deletioniam by other means. Since WP:NODEADLINE applies, building a draft that is clearly compliant with all relevant...

and the lack of clarity over into what article it would be merged. WP:NODEADLINE strikes me as applying here - nothing stopping it being reviewed again...

expanded on Wikipedia is not a reason to delete it: this isn't a BLP, WP:NODEADLINE still applies.--Arxiloxos (talk) 17:45, 29 December 2010 (UTC) Keep per...

falls. - Ahunt (talk) 23:15, 21 April 2013 (UTC) Keep - Wikipedia has WP:NODEADLINE; assuming the links will never be filled is crystal-balling (and inaccurate);...

Josh Milburn (talk) 08:45, 4 July 2016 (UTC) AfD is not for cleanup. WP:NODEADLINE. WP:DEMOLISH. If the mess upsets you, please take the initiative to either...

to hard-copy sources unavailable online. WP:IMPERFECT WP:NOTCLEANUP WP:NODEADLINE Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 00:22, 4 March 2013 (UTC) The above discussion is...

addressed by a) tagging if unable to b) resolve when possible (after all, WP:NODEADLINE), with the caveat for C) BRD if some issue is contentious. "Misuse" still...

and MI:8 may not be a thing in 2022. Shocking, I know!). WP:TOOSOON, WP:NODEADLINE, WP:CHILL (happy to know that one exists!). Nate • (chatter) 04:38, 19...

can be improved. Slow progress, also not a valid reason to delete (WP:NODEADLINE). We should be focused on the notability of the subject. Her work has...

consensus was to merge, just no one made the effort to do so. Per WP:NODEADLINE, there should be no rush to either. The page should not be entirely deleted...

a talk page post and give other editors time to make improvements; WP:NODEADLINE. ~Kvng (talk) 21:45, 18 June 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

the poor presentation of the information in the article, but there's WP:NODEADLINE, and the extensive list present may be useful to someone intending to...

work in their favour. Doug Mehus (talk) 17:07, 26 October 2019 (UTC) WP:NODEADLINES is an important part of Wikipedia. Like most of us, I've got a lot of...

standalone BLPs. Bearcat (talk) 23:46, 29 August 2017 (UTC) Wrong. See WP:NODEADLINE. Smartyllama (talk) 12:51, 30 August 2017 (UTC) That's a user essay, not...

Reywas92Talk 04:13, 30 September 2022 (UTC) Keep per WP:5P2, WP:5P5, and WP:NODEADLINE. The relevant text of 5P2 says "All articles must strive for verifiable...

--Lexein (talk) 22:51, 2 February 2011 (UTC) And at least half of the essay NODEADLINE supports my position. And even #2, which seems to be the section you are...

existence. "No one is interested enough to write it up" != "not notable". WP:NODEADLINE and all that jazz. I'm not an aficionado of amateur mycology myself, so...

Marcocapelle (talk) 07:39, 20 May 2023 (UTC) Keep per last TfD and WP:NODEADLINE. The claim that the use of the honorific in the Marslen-Wilson article...

html surely? --Oscarthecat (talk) 06:45, 13 August 2009 (UTC) Delete. WP:NODEADLINE applies only if the article is merely poorly written, rather than a copyright...

longer. :/ Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 22:30, 17 March 2020 (UTC) There's WP:NODEADLINE. Thanks for your comments and I hope your real life issues resolve in...

in the future." Several "keep" arguments are based on WP:EFFORT or WP:NODEADLINE without specifying an actual reason for retention. On a side note, there...

league team does not have presumed notability per any SNG. There is WP:NODEADLINE - we can wait to have an article on this team until notability is more...

"History of..." versions. Nihil novi (talk) 07:45, 20 December 2025 (UTC) WP:NODEADLINE. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:05, 28 December...

should be removing sourced content from this article, and there is WP:NODEADLINE for this article to be updated. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)...

help other editors find references. Please remember that there is WP:NODEADLINE. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC) @AustralianRupert:...

similar to this one. --LiamUJ (talk) 11:29, 17 September 2019 (UTC) WP:NODEADLINE. HTH. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:01,...

George Cross. As for writing the articles: I intend to write some, but WP:NODEADLINE applies. Still no reason to delete. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk...

need reform. ϢereSpielChequers 21:27, 30 December 2015 (UTC) Oppose WP:NODEADLINE. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 19:20, 2 January 2016 (UTC) Oppose...

editors to AfD within moments of article creation, and the sidelining of WP:NODEADLINE, I think giving a user time to work on something is beneficial, especially...

didn't see Barkeep's keep statement - I will let the AFD proceed as usual. NODEADLINE and all that. Primefac (talk) 01:39, 6 May 2019 (UTC) Note: since the...

there for over 3 years (in case the slow progress here bothers anyone, WP:NODEADLINE). ~Kvng (talk) 01:41, 16 June 2016 (UTC) User:Kvng, look - this time I...

2015 (UTC) Merge to European migrant crisis. Yet another case where WP:NODEADLINE is ignored and we can't wait to cover a recent event without waiting to...

cleanup (WP:NOTCLEANUP). I would also add that there's no deadline here (WP:NODEADLINE). One step that can be taken to encourage speedier improvements/rewrites...

three crewmembers, in addition to the helmsman. And while there is WP:NODEADLINE, there is also no deadline for us to have a deadline - would you be willing...

temporarily until a better picture of who this person was emerges. WP:NODEADLINE. —Locke Cole • t • c 23:04, 29 August 2025 (UTC) Keep while it is in the...

(UTC) This is not a good deletion rationale. See WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:NODEADLINES. ~Kvng (talk) 21:56, 4 August 2022 (UTC) If I had said "Unless this deletion...

(talk) 13:48, 24 August 2012 (UTC) Delete per notnews, undue, and WP:NODEADLINE. If this is notable, it can be incorporated into the main article in due...

template. – ukexpat (talk) 05:10, 24 December 2011 (UTC) To the OP: See WP:NODEADLINE. Wait the four days for the magazine to hit the newstands. There's no...

discussion and good faith effort to improve the article. There is WP:NODEADLINE for that. Deletion of the page and its edit history via AfD is not an...

January 2012 (UTC) reply - okay, I'll also refer you to WP:CRYSTAL, WP:NODEADLINE and WP:UPANDCOMING. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:20, 5 January 2012 (UTC) Reply...

take months, I'd even guess closer to a year at least. But that's why NODEADLINE exists as a helpful reminder potential workload shouldn't come between...

expeditated reviews. Volunteers will get to it at their own pace, WP:NODEADLINES. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:41, 21 February 2025 (UTC) I just meant...

putting in a lot of repetive table formatting for columns of TBD data (WP:NODEADLINE). Can this be automated? Otheriwse, do we just WP:IAR with this current...

now.68.102.57.28 (talk) 20:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC) WP:SODOIT and WP:NODEADLINE. Or you can post at WP:RA RudolfRed (talk) 21:51, 9 December 2016 (UTC)...

scope_creepTalk 15:10, 17 December 2022 (UTC) Scope creep, There is WP:NODEADLINE for creating articles, and no deadline for deleting them. we have time...

only do one thing at a time, but the issue has my attention. There is WP:NODEADLINE. TimothyJosephWood 02:11, 6 July 2016 (UTC) You literally accused editors...

months? After the next President is elected? Who knows? Wikipedia has WP:NODEADLINE and there is no emergency about having this topic have its own article;...

right now; maybe in another decade better sources will exist, per WP:NODEADLINE. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:19, 14 March 2022 (UTC) If you haven't yet been...

)--Sage (Wiki Ed) (talk) 23:30, 31 August 2021 (UTC) Thanks, Sage. Also, WP:NODEADLINE . Mathglot (talk) 23:51, 31 August 2021 (UTC) Mathglot: The format of...

way to live on an WP:VOLUNTEER project. See also WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:NODEADLINES. ~Kvng (talk) 17:49, 17 March 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

date until a human comes by and fixed it. Given Wikipedia is on a WP:NODEADLINE, that might be a long time during which the article will be wrong. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK...

repair-deficiency disorder.Novangelis (talk) 13:12, 19 May 2012 (UTC) Keep per WP:NODEADLINE. This list has the potential to be quite valuable. The objections listed...

covered later in news and even later in academia if it is notable (WP:NODEADLINE). But back to the reliability topic, no I don't believe tghat is reliable...

possible in such essays or articles in userspace into mainspace, with WP:NODEADLINE. I can't speak for Valjean and I may be reading too much into it or taking...

somehow create more editors who will work on them. More to the point, WP:NODEADLINE and a month is hardly a lot of time. Wikipedia has had one-liner stubs...

2015 (UTC) Merge to European migrant crisis. Yet another case where WP:NODEADLINE is ignored and we can't wait to cover a recent event without waiting to...

scholarly sources for Anderson Cooper's big daddy energy, then I'll clap back NODEADLINE. But seriously, that's covered by NOTNEWS isn't it? We'll come to Anderson...

developing this article is not a valid reason to support deleting it. WP:NODEADLINES WP:NOTCLEANUP. ~Kvng (talk) 13:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC) Keep – using...

WP:VOLUNTEERS and partly because that's how it's been set up to work. See WP:NODEADLINES, WP:NOTNEWS, and WP:RECENTISM for more on this. If there are factual...

As you have shown, that quickly happened giving us an RS to use. WP:NODEADLINE O3000 (talk) 00:47, 24 June 2020 (UTC) (edit conflict) The National Enquirer...

is a minor part of a non-policy essay. Why not try WP:NOTPAPER and WP:NODEADLINE. μηδείς (talk) 22:45, 6 June 2011 (UTC) The problem is that all of these...

their potential, not their current state. WP:DEMOLISH, WP:NOTCLEANUP, WP:NODEADLINES ~Kvng (talk) 13:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC) Keep per the significant coverage...

14:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC) There isn't clear consensus and there's WP:NODEADLINE on Wikipedia, so no need to speedy close this. There's multiple options...

"stop button" when something like this happens? I understand that WP:NODEADLINE might apply, and thankfully the damage seems somewhat contained, but this...

some Delete !voters will engage in deletioniam by other means. Since WP:NODEADLINE applies, building a draft that is clearly compliant with all relevant...

--Lexein (talk) 22:51, 2 February 2011 (UTC) And at least half of the essay NODEADLINE supports my position. And even #2, which seems to be the section you are...

discussion and good faith effort to improve the article. There is WP:NODEADLINE for that. Deletion of the page and its edit history via AfD is not an...

than paid-subscriptions, but it still isn't instantaneous. We have wp:NODEADLINE. We can wait a few years to see if citations appear in the existing journals...

January 2012 (UTC) reply - okay, I'll also refer you to WP:CRYSTAL, WP:NODEADLINE and WP:UPANDCOMING. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:20, 5 January 2012 (UTC) Reply...

Ainsa12 Why do you want to process to be sped up? Generally, there are WP:NODEADLINEs when it comes to the draft review process. Are you connected to the subject...

unless that's what you meant by "clutter". As a reminder, there is WP:NODEADLINE, so we will get to it when we get to it. –Fredddie™ 16:14, 26 October...

but this seems like way more of a WP:DEADLINEISNOW situation than a WP:NODEADLINE situation — the view count is likely going to fall drastically in the...

(talk) 13:48, 24 August 2012 (UTC) Delete per notnews, undue, and WP:NODEADLINE. If this is notable, it can be incorporated into the main article in due...

exists but it's always been something to look at without urgency (WP:NODEADLINE). You have written some great content on here but please don't take this...

this subject is indeed notable, an article can be recreated under WP:NODEADLINES with the valid sources and without the WP:COI induced WP:REFDUMP in its...

- the instrinsic COI for students becomes really clear with regard to NODEADLINE and OWN for their specific edits and comments, and is a yet deeper underlying...

or PMID 24119661? Wikipedia is not intended as news, and there is wp:NODEADLINE. If the new survey paper is seen to be significant and credible by the...

deliberately and clearly, on the article Talk page. Talk it out. There is WP:NODEADLINE, and I still don't know what specific bits of content you are finding...

notability and verifiability. It also operates with no deadlines. WP:NODEADLINE applies. Wikipedia is not part of anyone's PR machine, deletes advertorial...

― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  15:48, 13 May 2024 (UTC) There is also NODEADLINE to delete articles that as of now you cannot find coverage for. There's...

image doesn't violate the legal definition of fair use, so there is WP:NODEADLINE for deciding the outcome. I am willing to delete it if there is consensus...

all do. Jimmy686868 (talk) 20:03, 19 June 2025 (UTC) And? The are WP:NODEADLINES here and it looks like he was elected back in 2021 so not sure why now...

work and exams to attend to, etc. It is the only place on enWP where WP:NODEADLINE does not apply. This, ladies and gentlemen, is fundamentally the reason...

will require many months to a year to correct, but luckily there's WP:NODEADLINE. EEng 08:15, 18 November 2019 (UTC) Delist. Wikipedia has matured substantially...

works in it).Slatersteven (talk) 08:17, 24 October 2019 (UTC) Per WP:NODEADLINE, if it has not yet been properly reviewed and published but will be at...

about 'running out the clock' seemed to merit a gentle reminder of WP:NODEADLINE. I argued some of these discussions would best conducted on article talk...

government video footage was not foreseeable. Wikipedia operates under WP:NODEADLINE, but I was want to highlight WP:DEADLINENOW for current events. There...

And hence why we left it in and allow people to seek better sources WP:NODEADLINE and this nit picking with some agenda behind it which remains unclear...

be patient. There are eight requests older than yours and there is WP:NODEADLINE. It will be looked at in time. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:33, 5 November...

Draft space like your other drafts and submit for review when ready. WP:NODEADLINE RudolfRed (talk) 01:58, 15 February 2018 (UTC) Well, to be pedantic, there...

reasonable to bring in to the federalist or other articles. But there is WP:NODEADLINE and there is no good reason not to wait for the RfC to close. WP is not...

(talk) 09:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC) 27 november is perfect. There is NODEADLINE.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 12:11, 5 November 2019 (UTC) Ping.--Farang Rak...

it, you should close it in a timely way, or it should be reopened. WP:NODEADLINE Andre🚐 22:58, 1 September 2022 (UTC) @Red-tailed hawk: In case you missed...

outrageous with the content, and it has quite a few editors working on it. WP:NODEADLINE, let it take its course and see what comes of it. —Torchiest talkedits...

yet. Three good reasons why this RfC should not be closed prematurely. NODEADLINE implies there is no rush to get this done before the other technical requirements...

-- — Keithbob • Talk • 19:11, 21 May 2015 (UTC) I am OK waiting. WP:NODEADLINE. I am not sure if Collect can participate going forward or not, in light...

suggest that you submit it for review? Since there is no deadline (WP:NODEADLINE) a review usually provides the best quality control against summary deletion...

missing files, which is great and I'm all for it. That being said, WP:NODEADLINE still applies. –Fredddie™ 09:13, 10 December 2013 (UTC) Someone else has...

week?) as we have a very very eager beaver who doesn't understand WP:NODEADLINE. thx Jytdog (talk) 08:18, 25 November 2014 (UTC) Consider the edit warring...

B2C's edit is obviously fine. I will point out, however, that we have nodeadline here and since Enigman hasn't been active for the last couple of days...

image doesn't violate the legal definition of fair use, so there is WP:NODEADLINE for deciding the outcome. I am willing to delete it if there is consensus...

day. If it's Very Important Breaking News (despite Wikipedia having WP:NODEADLINES), consider simply making your own draft, using whatever sources you find...

Kungfu2187 (talk) 07:57, 16 May 2011 (UTC) File upload request declined per WP:NODEADLINE. It is just a matter of time before a free image becomes available and...

wait for some other people here to voice their opinions. There is WP:NODEADLINE and we need time to form WP:CONSENSUS. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 23:38, 4 November...

the claim. Maybe they, (or someone else,) knows of one that does. WP:NODEADLINE. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 15:51, 5 June 2020...

will require many months to a year to correct, but luckily there's WP:NODEADLINE. EEng 08:15, 18 November 2019 (UTC) Delist. Wikipedia has matured substantially...

months, when the source is no longer secured to subscribers. There is wp:NODEADLINE. LeadSongDog come howl! 20:41, 6 January 2012 (UTC) I'll do it by myself...

any serious issue in sourcing or accuracy, that's one thing. There's WP:NODEADLINE for getting it to GA status. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:34, 31 October 2019...

target audience. Thanks all again for your patience. I may have taken WP:NODEADLINE a bit too much to heart here. But I hope you find the article improved...

right thing. There aren't any obituaries showing up online. There's WP:NODEADLINE: if he is dead, he'll still be dead when reliable sources publish the...

motive was, yet. GoodDay (talk) 03:46, 9 January 2011 (UTC) There is wp:nodeadline. Until reliable sources are reporting on facts, as opposed to breaking...

(talk / contribs) 19:00, 28 May 2021 (UTC) Don't burn out, friends. WP:NODEADLINE! WP:MASTADON! WP:DROPTHESTICK! Etc. There will be others to pick up where...

would you even accept this? Sorry, but IRL is very hectic right now. WP:NODEADLINE applies. And DRN isn't for editor training. If the OP dosen't understand...

very urgent to Haptic, who doesn't seem to understand that there is WP:NODEADLINE here. While it is great that he/she figured out DR and stopped edit warring...

humongous amount of discussion above, i'm surprised no one has invoked WP:NODEADLINE yet. I can understand View 4 from there, but there is also the point to...

even if the de-PRODder didn't notice the AFD to oppose there too, per WP:NODEADLINE. But leaving it open to admin discretion (i.e. the status quo) is ok with...

are other motivations than just sourcing issues. Note that there is WP:NODEADLINE, and so removing the relevant content until concerns are resolved or evaluated...

See the first bullet point of WP:REDNO. I suppose I'm thinking of WP:NODEADLINE here: my reading of that first bullet point is that we shouldn't redlink...

easily be included in Superannuation in Australia. However, there is WP:NODEADLINE, and WP:IMPATIENT is one of the arguments to avoid in deletion discussions...

removed also! And there was no rush back: I'm a great believer in WP:NODEADLINE, so Gog's well-meant ping was albeit unnecessary, although appreciated...

website" Nearly a year went by since I brought this to FAR, Wikipedia has WP:NODEADLINE, however, a whole month disappeared since you last posted. This article...

Itcouldbepossible Talk 11:09, 1 September 2022 (UTC) Itcouldbepossible, WP:NODEADLINE :-). Let me know if it works for you. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me)...

you for contributing to this discussion. I understand and appreciate WP:NODEADLINE, but time is not the problem here. I'm patient when my requests are met...

only do one thing at a time, but the issue has my attention. There is WP:NODEADLINE. TimothyJosephWood 02:11, 6 July 2016 (UTC) You literally accused editors...

does matter, per WP:NSUSTAINED. Also please take care of yourself, WP:NODEADLINE. I know it's hard when your brain is fixated on something, but don't hurt...

happened yet. Heavy Chaos (talk) 23:41, 31 January 2023 (UTC) There is WP:NODEADLINE, which you alluded to earlier. I don't currently have a proposal to make...

may or may not be true. Related pertinent facts have yet to emerge. WP:NODEADLINE O3000, Ret. (talk) 22:07, 5 June 2025 (UTC) Fair point. anchovy TALK⁄CONT...

website" Nearly a year went by since I brought this to FAR, Wikipedia has WP:NODEADLINE, however, a whole month disappeared since you last posted. This article...

article without being started over from zero with what's there. And yes, WP:NODEADLINE is a thing but at some point you have to question if it's better to let...

of the article is not a valid WP:DELREASON. As said above, there is WP:NODEADLINE. The article is reasonably sourced and can be salvaged with editing as...

the discussion and record that as the decision having been reached. WP:NODEADLINE —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 04:13, 28 March 2023 (UTC) There was a...

unreasonable pressure on those who work in that subject area, when WP:NODEADLINE - just like sending a bunch of articles to AFD puts pressure on the article...

scale is going to be inherently imperfect, it bears remembering that WP:NODEADLINE applies to creation just as much as to deletion: if a subject is notable...

19 July 2025 (UTC) We need time to search for sources sounds like a nodeadline argument. Functionally, you can always relist this at DRV when you find...

it would reverse the NOLYMPICS decisions, but it might result in a WP:NODEADLINE grandfathering rule. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:10, 17 July 2025 (UTC) Keep...

for a proposed merge. SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:14, 27 August 2023 (UTC) WP:NODEADLINE. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:54, 27 August 2023...

longer. :/ Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 22:30, 17 March 2020 (UTC) There's WP:NODEADLINE. Thanks for your comments and I hope your real life issues resolve in...

the consensus version pending a proper evaluation of the sources per WP:NODEADLINE (the onus is on the one seeking to change the consensus version to prove...

(UTC) Oookay then. JMWt (talk) 15:13, 28 April 2025 (UTC) Keep per WP:NODEADLINES. We can re-assess notability once the dust settles but all of Iberia...

"breaking news" in the I/P articles, rather than remembering that there is WP:NODEADLINE and we can wait for multipe sources of established reliability rather...

see if any other reliable media actually picks up, as Wikipedia has WP:NODEADLINE, so we are not rushed to add one news piece. Our inclusion criteria on...

October 2023 (UTC) Oppose - Proposal does not respect WP:DEMOLISH or WP:NODEADLINES. We don't delete unreferecend articles at AfD so doing so via prod is...

are not obliged to populate the infobox casualty section. There is WP:NODEADLINE. In the meantime, we can write in the body of the article, a summary of...

six months and see if the landscape has changed. After all, there is WP:NODEADLINE. jps (talk) 20:21, 21 December 2024 (UTC) I haven't edited anything since...

good day!RoseSophie555 (talk) 11:54, 28 September 2023 (UTC) There is NODEADLINE. If sources don't exist now, when will they? You can always recreate the...

19 March 2023 (UTC) Is there any BLP or other concern that trumps WP:NODEADLINE in this situation, where it actually matters which WP:WRONGVERSION the...

I am personally waiting a bit to see how that shakes out, also per WP:NODEADLINE. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 09:47, 11 January 2024 (UTC) For clarity, I was...

pretty easily. I'm not saying to throw out our sourcing guidelines, but WP:NODEADLINE and use common sense. --Rschen7754 04:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC) TV plots...

It regularly inflames WP:CTOPS and is contrary to WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NODEADLINE. It would be better to wait for the historians even if they take their...

a thing will ever happen. It suffers from the chronic problem that WP:NODEADLINE applies while virtually any omission of information is automatically a...

71 (talk) 12:18, 9 August 2025 (UTC) Setting unnecessary deadlines (WP:NODEADLINE), announcing you'll re-insert disputed content even though it's clear...

have little to no skin in the game, and even I think some should keep NODEADLINE higher in their minds. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:09, 7 October 2023...

4000 articles is not the most helpful way to do this, and violates WP:NODEADLINE. Let editors have time to look into articles- as has been done for hundreds...

purpose to at least the people who edited it. See alsp WP:VOLUNTEER and WP:NODEADLINE regarding your concern that no one will maintain it. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney"...

not the most well developed at the moment, but WP:SURMOUNTABLE and WP:NODEADLINE. AfD is not the right place for a reckoning for any notable character...

14:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC) There isn't clear consensus and there's WP:NODEADLINE on Wikipedia, so no need to speedy close this. There's multiple options...

There are no other realistic options. If that is too slow a process, WP:NODEADLINE is good reading. --Jayron32 17:41, 26 May 2023 (UTC) I agree that this...

event more than a run-of-the-mill killing. Ultimately, since there's WP:NODEADLINE, I think that at this juncture it makes sense to keep and circle back...

(talk) 16:53, 23 October 2023 (UTC) I'm a bit inclined to invoke WP:NODEADLINES and WP:NOTNEWS. The article is a working paper awaiting review, but the...

Possibly WP:TOOSOON, but it can always be deleted later if need be per WP:NODEADLINE, and draftifying will allow editors with an interest in the subject to...

side that said that the articles aren't hurting anything, there is WP:NODEADLINE, so they might be expanded, Wikipedia is WP:NOTPAPER, so we have the space...

does matter, per WP:NSUSTAINED. Also please take care of yourself, WP:NODEADLINE. I know it's hard when your brain is fixated on something, but don't hurt...

"History of..." versions. Nihil novi (talk) 07:45, 20 December 2025 (UTC) WP:NODEADLINE. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:05, 28 December...

citing WP:BURDEN. While I consider this WP:DISRUPTIVE, WP:DEMOLISH and WP:NODEADLINES, they believe by removing well-vetted but uncited material they're following...

but these improvements can be handled outside AfD - WP:NOTCLEANUP, WP:NODEADLINES. ~Kvng (talk) 15:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

articles. Schazjmd (talk) 16:57, 13 September 2025 (UTC) IMO its a WP:NODEADLINE situation, the thousand edits can either be made by you right here right...

this subject is indeed notable, an article can be recreated under WP:NODEADLINES with the valid sources and without the WP:COI induced WP:REFDUMP in its...

― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  15:48, 13 May 2024 (UTC) There is also NODEADLINE to delete articles that as of now you cannot find coverage for. There's...

their potential, not their current state. WP:DEMOLISH, WP:NOTCLEANUP, WP:NODEADLINES ~Kvng (talk) 13:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC) Keep per the significant coverage...

up to you and how much effort you wish to expend on it. See also: WP:NODEADLINE. Mathglot (talk) 03:08, 6 March 2026 (UTC) @Mathglot: Thanks for the clarification...

reliable sources. Masem (t) 18:24, 17 November 2024 (UTC) There are WP:NODEADLINES here. We can actually wait 10 years and see. JFHJr (㊟) 18:26, 17 November...

extra consideration and work involved; it's a feature not a bug, WP:NODEADLINES. ~Kvng (talk) 15:22, 25 January 2026 (UTC) Yes/Support. To expand on...

reorganization is needed without the threat of deletion. WP:NOTCLEANUP WP:NODEADLINES. ~Kvng (talk) 18:36, 13 July 2023 (UTC) My goal with the merge suggestion...

exists but it's always been something to look at without urgency (WP:NODEADLINE). You have written some great content on here but please don't take this...

might be best just to let the process run its course. There's really WP:NODEADLINE in effect here; so, if you've satisfactorily improved the draft and addressed...

maintenance tags on it and keep it for now per WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:NODEADLINES. ~Kvng (talk) 15:13, 21 October 2023 (UTC) Can you find evidence that...

is not improvement and it is not the Wikipedia way - WP:DEMOLISH, WP:NODEADLINES. ~Kvng (talk) 01:08, 15 March 2024 (UTC) I agree with your reasoning...

may or may not be true. Related pertinent facts have yet to emerge. WP:NODEADLINE O3000, Ret. (talk) 22:07, 5 June 2025 (UTC) Fair point. anchovy TALK⁄CONT...

deletion request. The article is not in that bad of shape WP:NOTCLEANUP. WP:NODEADLINES and WP:DOIT for the complaint that the article hasn't been fixed since...

WP:COI. Sillentbutviolant (talk) 09:35, 25 August 2025 (UTC) Three are WP:NODEADLINES. Please follow our dispute resolution guideline. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);...

January 2026 (UTC) Hi TheGreatEditor024. For the most part, there are WP:NODEADLINES when it comes to most things you can do on Wikipedia. There's no specific...

Inca for review only just yesterday (December 30, 2023). There are WP:NODEADLINES for many things when it comes to Wikipedia, but trying to speed up the...

(UTC) It's especially troublesome because editors frequently cite WP:NODEADLINE. Ymerazu (talk) 03:08, 17 April 2025 (UTC) Because the talk page has been...

opposed, 1 in favor of inclusion. Furthermore, Hotwiki alluded to WP:NODEADLINE, which is a policy-based argument of "Let's wait and see before we add...

mess so it should be calm and deliberate action which gets us out. WP:NODEADLINE etc. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 21:18, 7 October 2023 (UTC) According to...

I think the call for a TBan is absurd. Keep in mind that we have WP:NODEADLINE. O3000, Ret. (talk) 17:55, 26 July 2024 (UTC) I second what Objective3000...

generally 1000 times better than no citation at all. The OP cites WP:NODEADLINE but that also applies here. If you don't want to clean up the bare URLs...

12 January 2023 (UTC) There is no "misconduct" here. Kindly read WP:NODEADLINE. This is a volunteer project. You are not entitled to a response within...

editor in trouble just because you are too busy to discuss it yourself. WP:NODEADLINE is relevant here. Epachmo made other suggestions for refactoring the table...

beginning to feel like they need to take a chill pill and possibly reread WP:NODEADLINE. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  16:23, 8 April 2023 (UTC) I agree here...

it and you may gain more support, feel better, and avoid sanctions, WP:NODEADLINE 3.) Assume good faith and be civil. I will not repeat the several odd...

See the first bullet point of WP:REDNO. I suppose I'm thinking of WP:NODEADLINE here: my reading of that first bullet point is that we shouldn't redlink...

as full consensus on the exact sentence hasn't been achieved and WP:NODEADLINES. I still find it a bit annoying I won't be able to edit it until effectively...

19 July 2025 (UTC) We need time to search for sources sounds like a nodeadline argument. Functionally, you can always relist this at DRV when you find...

for a proposed merge. SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:14, 27 August 2023 (UTC) WP:NODEADLINE. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:54, 27 August 2023...

result of a future trial WP:CRYSTAL. Unlike a newspaper, there is WP:NODEADLINE. The word murder should only be included in quotes until we know it is...

side that said that the articles aren't hurting anything, there is WP:NODEADLINE, so they might be expanded, Wikipedia is WP:NOTPAPER, so we have the space...