DOKUMEN123.COM

This page is not an encyclopedia article or a Wikipedia policy, as it has not been reviewed by the community. Shortcuts WP:CRITWP:CRIT WP:NOCRITWP:NOCRIT...

single sentences applies to WP:Notability, except Controversies (See WP:NOCRIT, which means all article's reliable sources cannot refer only Criticism)...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Beyond unnecessary article. See WP:NOCRIT. It is unsuprising to see that a recently released movie has caused controversy...

It is true that there are users who add such sections in violation of WP:NOCRIT but these two accounts have over-done it. Sachi bbsr added such POV sections...

"forum-shopping" violating WP:CIVIL, NPOV, WP:NOT, WP:AGF, WP:TE, and WP:NOCRIT (a much-alluded-to but not-existing policy) etc. This RFAR follows several...

single sentences applies to WP:Notability, except Controversies (See WP:NOCRIT, which means all article's reliable sources cannot refer only Criticism)...

this page is entirely unnecessary. See WP:NOPAGE and this section of WP:NOCRIT. Capitals00 (talk) 05:09, 31 August 2023 (UTC) Comment: At this writing...

Of notable bearing is the scope of BLP and how it relates to WP:NOCRIT, and how NOCRIT has any bearing at all when it's neither definitive, nor consistent...

treated. Several parties referenced a "no criticism sections" essay (WP:NOCRIT), as policy, and claimed that BLP was controlling in all subarticles. A...

that talkpage, making a similarly uncanny-valley policy argument, that WP:NOCRIT limits coverage of criticism by the BLP subject. It was Jtbobwaysf who later...

also don't think there should be a dedicated "Controversy" section per WP:NOCRIT. The relevant facts should be described in another section of the article...

and therefore can't be an issue – to the History section, in line with WP:NOCRIT. The second request is a bit meatier and involves removing some content...

and therefore can't be an issue – to the History section, in line with WP:NOCRIT. The second request is a bit meatier and involves removing some content...

this page is entirely unnecessary. See WP:NOPAGE and this section of WP:NOCRIT. Capitals00 (talk) 05:09, 31 August 2023 (UTC) Comment: At this writing...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Beyond unnecessary article. See WP:NOCRIT. It is unsuprising to see that a recently released movie has caused controversy...

single sentences applies to WP:Notability, except Controversies (See WP:NOCRIT, which means all article's reliable sources cannot refer only Criticism)...

criticism section at all is (in my view) in line with policy because WP:NOCRIT advises us that "politics, religion and philosophy topics" can contain such...

WP:CONTROVERSYSECTION. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:44, 8 January 2024 (UTC) While WP:NOCRIT is just an essay, and in cases where backlash is substantial enough to be...

non-neutral and violates WP:STRUCTURE. Though just an essay, I think WP:NOCRIT also supports changing/removing the heading The first paragraph contains...

@Jtbobwaysf: You are not "an uninvolved editor". Some of your edits evoked WP:NOCRIT in a way that does not appear to address the kind of issues covered by that...

consistenly violates our WP:UNDUE policy, our WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy, and our WP:NOCRIT, as seen on his edits on 'British Army Training Unit Kenya', '40 Commando'...