DOKUMEN123.COM

contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article or a Wikipedia policy, as it has not been reviewed by the community. Shortcut WP:NJOURNALSWP:NJOURNALS...

Note 1 in WP:NJournals#Notes and examples is satisfied and thus criterion 1 in WP:NJournals#Criteria is satisfied, and thus WP:NJournals is satisfied...

WP:NJournals. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 16:36, 5 January 2016 (UTC) Upon further consideration, I have concluded that this article passes WP:NJournals;...

Keep per RK. Clear pass of WP:NJOURNALS. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:33, 29 May 2022 (UTC) Speedy Keep Pass WP:NJournals Owlf 📪 13:22, 1 June 2022 (UTC)...

WP:NJournals. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 19:03, 5 January 2016 (UTC) Upon further consideration, I have concluded that this article passes WP:NJournals;...

misreading of NJournals#3. Randykitty (talk) 10:29, 6 November 2014 (UTC) Keep. The Wiki Page needs to stay. 1. It meets criteria of WP:NJournals it is indeed...

independent references listed are just in-passing mentions. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 11:53, 7 January 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

in the article Per WP:NJournals - criterion 1 and 2 met by information in above-mentioned information, so does meet WP:NJournals requirements. Unfortunately...

No argument or evidence advanced that the article meets WP:GNG or WP:NJOURNALS j⚛e deckertalk 20:18, 25 June 2012 (UTC) UBC International Law Journal...

meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.". Article dePRODded by article creator who on the talk page and in edit summaries claims that this meet NJournals#2 by adding...

WP:NJournals. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 19:18, 5 January 2016 (UTC) Upon further consideration, I have concluded that this article passes WP:NJournals;...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. ~ Nanosci (talk) 00:37, 4 January 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

(Help!) 11:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC) Keep. I'm not sure if this fails WP:NJOURNALS, which explains that "[t]he most typical way of satisfying Criterion 1...

database, making this a fail of WP:NJournals. As the nom indicates, no in-depth sources, so this also fails WP:NJournals. --Randykitty (talk) 09:13, 9 December...

(UTC) Delete, fails WP:NJOURNALS. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 10:05, 26 July 2019 (UTC) Comment Firstly, I note that WP:NJOURNALS is an essay, not a policy...

WP:NJournals. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 19:22, 5 January 2016 (UTC) Upon further consideration, I have concluded that this article passes WP:NJournals;...

15:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC) Keep meets WP:NJournals DeVerm (talk) 20:44, 10 May 2016 (UTC) Keep clear pass of WP:NJOURNALS. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by SPA after adding promotional stuff (also...

WP:NJournals. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 19:06, 5 January 2016 (UTC) Upon further consideration, I have concluded that this article passes WP:NJournals;...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by article creator, who added a phrase that...

creator/maintainer has inadequate understanding of journal notability guidelines (WP:NJournals); attempts to request proof of notability were rejected with simplistic...

(UTC) Delete. Clear fail of WP:NJournals. -- 101.117.89.21 (talk) 02:04, 13 August 2014 (UTC) Comment. (1) NJournals is not an SNG. (2) Deleting this...

selective in the sense of WP:NJournals, so inclusion in them does not establish notability and this still fails NJournals#C1. --Randykitty (talk) 11:27...

sources" (NJournals#2) and as I have shown above, it is not "considered by reliable sources to be influential in its subject area" (NJournals#1). It's...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded with reason "I agree that the article has...

Hence, it fails WP:NJournals. ~ Nanosci (talk) 00:46, 27 May 2022 (UTC) The journal corresponds Criterion 2 2b) of WP:NJournals: finding citations to...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Indexed pretty much nowhere, fails WP:NJOURNALS Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 13:54, 30 April 2020 (UTC) Possibly move to "Draft"...

don't believe that it qualifies under any of the criteria outlined at WP:NJournals. Cordless Larry (talk) 16:39, 21 July 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." DePRODded by article creator after adding a statement to the...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by anonymous IP without reason given. PROD...

GNG) or indexing in a selective database (needed for NJournals; note that not both GNG and NJournals need to be met, either one is sufficient). --Randykitty...

notability per the criteria in WP:NJournals. --Mark viking (talk) 06:43, 18 November 2014 (UTC) Keep. Satisfies NJournals. James500 (talk) 17:21, 21 November...

Does not pass WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 16:17, 29 April 2016 (UTC) Delete Non-notable by standards of WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Also...

indexed any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by creator with reason "It is a notable...

references for 2.5 years with no improvement forthcoming. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 23:34, 13 February 2013 (UTC) Delete A search...

Science Citation Index Expanded and SCOPUS and has an impact factor; per WP:NJournals, the journal thus satisfies criterion 1: The journal is considered by...

please note that WP:NJournals takes precedence over WP:N. And since the article satisfies the third criterion of WP:NJournals, the following provision...

Randykitty. Passes WP:NJOURNALS. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 12:47, 19 January 2017 (UTC) Keep passes NJOURNALS - it is in "Scopus source...

the sources currently on the page contribute to WP:GNG. WP:NJOURNALS is a wp:essay. NJOURNAL alsosays "If an academic journal cannot be demonstrated to...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded because of a recent edit by article creator...

to WP:NJOURNALS. Whoever Ivoted that it is selective before didn't understand selective according to standards set by Wikipedia and NJOURNALS. Hence...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 21:29, 21 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate...

of significant coverage, which is required by both WP:NJournals and WP:GNG. As for WP:NJournals#C3 historic purpose or a significant history, no one in...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 18:45, 15 April 2018 (UTC) I would rather...

sources, not listed in any selective major databases. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. --Randykitty (talk) 12:22, 5 June 2013 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

wasn't sure about NJournals either, that's why I didn't include it in the nom. As you say, doesn't meet GNG (and even if NJournals would apply, doesn't...

this article doesn't meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Drchriswilliams (talk) 14:23, 25 February 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:NJournals and WP:TOOSOON. Without any...

highly-selective databases. NJournals explains why such inclusion is significant coverage. --Randykitty (talk) 21:57, 9 March 2026 (UTC) NJournals does not explain...

2021 (UTC) Delete Does not meet WP:NJOURNALS --Whiteguru (talk) 22:02, 26 July 2021 (UTC) Delete. Misses NJournals and GNG. Sounds predatory, but not...

not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals, hence: delete. Guillaume2303 (talk) 16:38, 30 May 2012 (UTC) Delete — fails WP:GNG and WP:NJournals, as outlined in the...

Does not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 16:27, 27 January 2016 (UTC) Delete May pass WP:NJOURNALS one day, but that day is not...

selective databases, cannot find any independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 10:02, 18 February 2019 (UTC) Note: This...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NJOURNALS, with all the sources being taken from the journal except one which does...

JSTOR · TWL) This is a legitimate journal but not an impactful one per WP:NJOURNALS. It is ranked in the bottom quartile of economics journals by impact factor...

newsletter. No independent sources, not indexed anywhere. Not sure WP:NJournals applies, but in any case it isn't met. Also fails WP:GNG. (Apologies:...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." DePRODed by article creator because the journal "has been...

included in any selective major databases. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Randykitty (talk) 08:00, 30 June 2013 (UTC) Delete. As far as I can see...

Reuters, like the Social Sciences Citation Index, which is listed under WP:NJOURNALS criterion 1. I'm not completely sure though, so, @Randykitty:, could I...

journal. No selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. WP:TOOSOON". Article dePRODded by article creator without specific...

journal, not indexed in any major, selective databases. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." DePRODded with justification "removing proposal for deletion...

independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." While I agree that on its face value, this seems to fail WP:NJOURNALS, there was a lot of (possibly...

evidence of passing WP:NJournals. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:23, 7 October 2013 (UTC) Redirect As said above, doesn't meet WP:NJournals, but a redirect does...

meets the criteria in WP:GNG and WP:NJournals. Your idea that we should conflate academics and WP:GNG and WP:NJournals is inappropriate because the standards...

Gabriel.eichsteller (talk) 10:03, 19 July 2013 (UTC)Gabe Delete Fails WP:NJournals decisively, as well as WP:GNG. No independent sources. Not included in...

NJournals in a while, although I regularly invoke it for PROD or AFD of articles on non-notable academic journals. I'm pretty certain that NJournals used...

about it). Fails WP:NJOURNALS and WP:GNG. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 03:03, 18 June 2018 (UTC) Delete - Agree. Doesn't pass WP:NJOURNALS. †Basilosauridae❯❯❯Talk...

sources, not indexed in any selective databases. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals, hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:27, 29 May 2019 (UTC) Note: This...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Indexing nowhere selective. Fails WP:NJOURNALS and WP:GNG. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:21, 30 September 2020 (UTC) Note:...

this journal does not meet NJournals#2. A handful of references to articles in the journal are to be expected. When NJournals#2 talks about "frequently...

http://science.thomsonreuters.com/mjl/). No independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Guillaume2303 (talk) 07:19, 24 October 2012 (UTC) Delete --...

University. There's less discussion that I'd like of Umimak's sources; NJOURNALS doesn't need to be met if GNG is. However, absent any other support for...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 22:00, 12 July 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate...

included in any selective major databases. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals". In the absence of any evidence of notability: Delete. Guillaume2303...

reason. PROD reason still stands: "Non-notable journal, does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG". Hence: Delete. Guillaume2303 (talk) 09:49, 29 April 2012 (UTC)...

have added that info, with reference, to the article), which meets WP:NJournals. --Randykitty (talk) 09:34, 30 August 2018 (UTC) Keep per RK. Headbomb...

sources, not indexed in any selective major databases. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. --Randykitty (talk) 12:07, 7 July 2013 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

I agree that this passes NJOURNALS. Scopus says that it's (currently) a middle-quintile journal in its field, which NJOURNALS indicates is considered "influential"...

sources are a press release and the journal's website). Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:18, 26 February 2016 (UTC)...

the only real notability guideline for journal notability is WP:GNG (WP:NJournals is suggestive but not definitive), and no in-depth independently published...

major selective database in the field, ATLA, which is a keep under WP:NJournals. --Randykitty (talk) 09:52, 30 November 2013 (UTC) Keep Nothing has changed...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." DePRODded after a reference showing an in-passing mention...

not a selective database in the sense of WP:NJournals. No independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. I'm not saying I agree or disagree...

April 2016 (UTC) Keep. Indexed by Scopus, which is enough to meet WP:NJournals. --Randykitty (talk) 11:19, 18 April 2016 (UTC) Merge per Mr. Magoo. Being...

2017 (UTC) Keep - easily passes WP:NJOURNALS. StAnselm (talk) 20:23, 6 April 2017 (UTC) Keep Easy pass of NJournals. I have removed the reference to the...

not indicate any coverage). No independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Guillaume2303 (talk) 08:08, 24 October 2012 (UTC) Delete --...

is no consensus that meeting NJOURNALS establishes notability. Per MaterialsPsych, establishing consensus for NJOURNALS is beyond the scope of an AfD...

independent sources, not indexed in any selective database. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by anonymous IP with reason "challenging...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This journal does not appear to meet WP:NJOURNALS. Searching its ISSN on Social Sciences Citation Index and Scopus does...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 19:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC) The deletion...

database. Tagged for notability since 2010. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals, hence: Delete. Guillaume2303 (talk) 07:31, 14 September 2012 (UTC) Note:...

http://science.thomsonreuters.com/mjl/). No independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Guillaume2303 (talk) 07:19, 24 October 2012 (UTC) Delete --...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded without reason given after addition of some...

NJournals. Academic journals are rarely the subject of articles in other media. That does pose a problem. If you delve into the history of NJournals (still...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:59, 29 January 2019 (UTC)...

satisfies criterion #2 of WP:NJournals. Therefore, this journal meets the requirements for inclusion according WP:NJOURNALS. Criterion #1 is not the only...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 03:03, 11 February 2014 (UTC) Note: This...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODed by article creator (Gleaman: note that the...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Apparently fails WP:NJOURNALs. jps (talk) 17:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded with reason "one of only two sociological...

http://science.thomsonreuters.com/mjl/). No independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Guillaume2303 (talk) 07:20, 24 October 2012 (UTC) Delete --...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails under WP:NJOURNALS , no reliable sources to be influential in its subject area, not cited...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article contains a list of references to blogs (not reliable...

selective databases (the only one listed being zMATH), so this fails WP:NJournals. There are two references, one a trivial listing, the other a dead link...

criteria clearly indicate that this is not selective in the sense of WP:NJournals. The article also contains claims that the journal is affiliated with...

America1000 02:46, 5 May 2017 (UTC) Keep, while this initially seems to fail WP:NJOURNALS, based on it being indexed nowhere selective with no independent sources...

Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Crusio (talk) 14:12, 15 October 2011 (UTC) Delete as non-notable per both WP:GNG and WP:NJournals. Crusio pretty much...

therapy. The solution is to create the article if the journal passes WP:NJOURNALS, or live with the redlink being listed (not every such journal will be...

indexed in any selective database, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. --Randykitty (talk) 17:21, 2 July 2015 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

should only be created (even if they are listed here) if they meet WP:NJournals and/or WP:GNG. This list grew out of a discussion where it was felt that...

JSTOR · TWL) Indexed nowhere selective. No independent sources. Fails WP:NJOURNALS and WP:GNG Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 09:59, 12 August 2022 (UTC) Note:...

just this month. Too young to be notable yet. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Crusio (talk) 20:39, 21 April 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable academic journal. Fails WP:NJOURNALS (not included in selective indexing services) and WP:GNG. An article from...

become notable. Article creation premature. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. (Note on PubMed listing: being selected MEDLINE is a rather selective...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article de-PRODded by article creator after adding a press...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This fails WP:NJOURNALS and seemingly WP:GNG as well, but there could be a valid merge target...

which have cited an article published in this journal. Does not pass WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Previous AfD in November 2013 was closed as "no consensus"...

any database (selective or not; see here]). Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Randykitty (talk) 16:43, 13 December 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:41, 30 March 2015 (UTC) I agree, fails WP:NJournals or WP:GNG, so delete...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by DGG with stated reason "I am unwilling...

relevant criterion of WP:NJournals. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:01, 25 April 2015 (UTC) Delete Doesn't look to pass WP:GNG or WP:NJOURNAL. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:25...

journal that does not seem to meet any of the minimum criteria of WP:NJournals. Unable to find any reliable, independent sources. - MrX 03:41, 1 March...

first point you seem to argue that NJournals is only an essay. That is correct, but if we choose to ignore NJournals and apply WP:GNG instead, then The...

selective database, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Guillaume2303 (talk) 08:53, 26 January 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

http://science.thomsonreuters.com/mjl/). No independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Guillaume2303 (talk) 07:20, 24 October 2012 (UTC) Delete --...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:31, 18 January 2015 (UTC)...

meet NJournals (and even less WP:GNG). --Randykitty (talk) 12:50, 28 August 2024 (UTC) Keep: seems to pass a straightforward reading of NJournals #1, which...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by article creator who added several sources...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails GNG and NJOURNALS. No indication of notability. This journal is not listed in any selective...

only the non-selective databases listed here. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Randykitty (talk) 21:25, 14 August 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

Indexed nowhere, possibly lying about being in DOAJ. Fails WP:GNG/WP:NJOURNALS and likely predatory. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 03:15, 3 February 2019...

either show that this meets WP:NJournals or WP:GNG, either one is sufficient. It's fine with me if you want to shove WP:NJournals aside. In that case, please...

fake ranking site Index Copernicus) are selective in the sense of WP:NJournals. The article currently lists 12 "references" (bare URLs), none of which...

impact factor is modest now but has been >1 in the past, thus passing WP:NJOURNALS criteria 1 and 2. H-index of 31 doesn't seem too shabby either. Jclemens...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Albeit slightly less new now (the journal was established...

but no in-depth coverage necessary to meet WP:GNG. Does not meet WP:NJOurnals or GNG. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:10, 12 May 2018 (UTC) Delete as original...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 07:49, 29 September 2014 (UTC) Do NOT Delete...

Non-notable journal associated with the predatory published ScopeMed. Fails WP:NJOURNALS Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

2014 (UTC) WP:NJournals is a WP:ESSAY not a WP:policy. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:07, 21 April 2014 (UTC) Keep per Mark viking, meets WP:NJournals. Softlavender...

Indexed in Scopus, meets NJournals. --Randykitty (talk) 09:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC) As for the relist comment: NJournals explains why I think this has...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:21, 1 August 2015 (UTC)...

Keep Indexing in the Social Sciences Index [1] is sufficient to meet WP:NJOURNALS. This might actually not be true, but I am still voting keep per Randykitty's...

independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 11:32, 17 March 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NJournals and WP:GNG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk)...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Article creation too soon." Article dePRODed without reason...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded arguing that this, being "the first multilingual...

Smitty Werben 15:11, 27 December 2020 (UTC) Speedy keep. Clear meet of WP:NJournals: included in Scopus and the Social Sciences Citation Index. In 2017 the...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Article creation likely WP:TOOSOON." Article de-PRODded because...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article de-PRODded by article creator with reason "The journal...

sources, not included in any selective major databases. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2012 (UTC) Strong KEEP...

here you are as always pretending that WP:NJOURNALS is an actual guideline. Note to AfD closer: NJOURNALS is just an essay written by Headbomb himself...

meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.". Article dePRODded with reason "indexed in ADS". However, ADS is not a selective database in the sense of NJournals, so PROD...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." DePRODded by article creator without reason given. Journal...

no independent sources covering the journal in depth. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 07:27, 3 February 2017 (UTC) Keep: The journal...

in BIOSIS Previews, which is only mildly selective. Does not meet WP:NJournals. There is some content in the article history, but it was deleted as being...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Indexed nowhere, fails WP:NJOURNALS and WP:GNG Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 13:32, 19 August 2019 (UTC) Note:...

(talk) 19:24, 6 September 2015 (UTC) Delete. Does not seem to meet WP:NJournals - The nine papers indexed by Google Scholar did not receive any citation...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 07:28, 30 April 2015 (UTC)...

WP:GNG for other reasons", so failing WP:NJOURNALS is not necessarily a reason to delete. Also, WP:NJOURNALS#C2 says that "The comprehensiveness of the...

America1000 01:16, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Delete/merge Dismal failure of WP:NJournals. Not indexed in any selective database. The editor claims on her user...

Journal Citation Reports, as this journal does, is an automatic pass of WP:NJOURNALS. Everymorning talk 23:11, 8 March 2015 (UTC) Keep. A peer-reviewed journal...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded with reason "I request not to delete, be...

independent sources discussing this journal in-depth. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG". Article dePRODded by article creator after adding 2 references...

taken as satisfying WP:NJournals. --Randykitty (talk) 22:14, 24 December 2021 (UTC) Keep: Article seems to pass WP:NJOURNALS Criterion C1. WP:BEFOREweb...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG Vanjagenije (talk) 09:20, 16 October 2014 (UTC) Delete Thanks...

In Scopus and has a JCR impact factor, so it meets notability via WP:NJOURNALS. --Mark viking (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC) Weak delete: Notability...

GNG or WP:NJournals. Gonzlinares, even after the journal has a website, ISSN, and a call for papers, it will still not meet GNG or NJournals and any recreation...

not indexed in any major selective database: does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Guillaume2303 (talk) 13:11, 24 July 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:TOOSOON...

complete journal). In conclusion, not a single one of the criteria of WP:NJournals are met, nor does this meet WP:GNG. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 06:42...

journal thus satisfies notability criteria according to WP:NJournals criterion 1. While WP:NJournals is still technically an essay, in AfD discussions about...

Catalana. Not indexed in any selective databases. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals, hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 09:44, 6 November 2016 (UTC) Note: This...

keep this journal article based on WP:NJournals. In fact, it is clearly stated that this does not meet NJournals. --Randykitty (talk) 22:04, 14 March 2024...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 06:15, 2 June 2015 (UTC) Delete...

May 2017 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NJOURNALS. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 14:27, 7 May 2017 (UTC) Delete: fails WP:NJOURNALS. --Guy Macon (talk) 02:18, 8 May...

(UTC) WP:SJ and WP:NJournals are in direct conflict with each other. Both are officially essays but my opinion is that WP:NJournals is much closer to being...

Clearly this passes WP:NJOURNALS, but of course that is an essay rather than a guideline. My general feeling is that NJOURNALS is an attempt to find an...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by creator after edits by a SPA and themselves...

the least selective database among those that WP:NJournals considers "selective". Clear fail of NJournals. No independent sources, so also fails WP:GNG....

sources, not indexed in any selective major database. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 20:59, 27 March 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate...

MIAR included in several highly selective databases. Clearly meets WP:NJournals. Article is too brief and fails to show notability clearly (although having...

times. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:51, 29 December 2016 (UTC) Delete. Fails NJournals and GNG. --Randykitty (talk) 11:01, 30 December 2016 (UTC) Note: This...

update to the WP:NJournals essay. Previous rationale for reference: Weak keep Appears to meet criteria #1 of (the essay) WP:NJournals (at least with reference...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Article creation way too soon." Article dePRODded (by creator...

be indexed in any bibliographic database. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. (Note: The article was apparently recreated 2 or 3 weeks after deletion...

would not meet NJournals. Likewise, MIAR does not include this journal, but lists 3 non-selective databases. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG, perhaps...

premature, journal too young to have already become notable. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Crusio (talk) 11:16, 9 February 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate...

IF. Easily passes WP:NJOURNALS. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 07:42, 1 September 2025 (UTC) Keep of course. Clear pass of NJournals as Headbomb explains....

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. --Randykitty (talk) 17:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC) It's not four...

Academics likes to fudge things like these to look better) and meets WP:NJOURNALS. The journal has a longer history than at Allied Academics, having been...

to the field (cf. WP:NJOURNALS). Your striking argument is that the journal is not listed in some sources detailed in WP:NJOURNALS. Foremost, Scopus, FENS...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by article creator with reason "It is from...

independent sources, not indexed in any selective databases. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 08:21, 28 August 2013 (UTC)...

sources, not indexed in any selective major databases. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Prod was contested by the journal's editor. VQuakr (talk) 08:42...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 17:16, 26 December 2013 (UTC) Note: This...

indexed in Social Sciences Citation Index and Scopus. Clear meet of WP:NJOURNALS. Sources should be easy to add (see WP:JWG). --Randykitty (talk) 07:29...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Article dePRODded because the journal is published by Springer...

(UTC) Journal is indexed and fairly well-ranked in SCOPUS. Keep per WP:NJOURNALS. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 07:54, 2 April 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by article creator without reason given...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 17:26, 1 June 2018 (UTC) Comment This is...

since November last year. No indication that this meets WP:GNG or WP:NJournals, hence: Delete. Guillaume2303 (talk) 16:58, 8 October 2012 (UTC) Delete...

indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Too soon." Article dePRODded with reason "Journal edited by...

meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article de-PRODded by article creator after adding 2 sources that however also do not satisfy either NJournals or GNG. PROD...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 20:06, 14 September 2016 (UTC) Note: This...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." DePRODded by article creator who added an in-passing mention...

mentioned is a selective database in the sense of WP:NJournals. Therefore this fails both GNG and NJournals. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 04:24, 18 December...

Reference Center" is only a minor one. Therefore, this still does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG: no independent sources, not indexed in any selective database...

sources, I don't think this can be kept. Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:V, and WP:NJournals. Guillaume2303 (talk) 13:19, 17 December 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by SPA, after several external links were...

to become notable, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals." Nothing has changed since the dePROD, hence: delete. Crusio (talk) 12:02...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." PROD removed by article creator with reason "I believe that...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by creator without reason stated; PROD reason...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG Randykitty (talk) 17:24, 2 November 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate...

not certain that this journal fails WP:NJOURNALS, but I'm also struggling to prove that it passes WP:NJOURNALS. I'm mostly turning up things about the...

Architecture, has an ISI impact factor and therefore satisfies criteria 1 of WP:NJournals. I also found this. Its other publications also seem to be widely cited...

the sense of WP:NJournals. Also misses WP:GNG. --Randykitty (talk) 10:21, 8 January 2026 (UTC) Delete per Randykitty, fails WP:NJOURNALS. Headbomb {t ·...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 16:42, 7 August 2017 (UTC) Keep. This journal...

WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded after addition of indexing info. However, none of the added databases are selective in the sense of NJournals...

not very selective Emerging Sources Citation Index). Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." PROD reason still stands, hence: delete. Randykitty (talk)...

significant impact on his/her field of study. NJournals was modelled in part on PROF (I know, I started NJournals and the edit summary of that first edit actually...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by SPA editor without reason provided. SPA...

Not listed in any selective major database. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Crusio (talk) 16:59, 7 July 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

"Non-notable journal. Only one short independent source. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article was dePRODded with edit summary "I did everything...

Expanded and Scopus, with a respectable impact factor of 4.8. The essay WP:NJournals explains why I feel that this means that this journal is notable. --Randykitty...

in Google Books, but no in-depth independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by creator who posted a justification on...

(UTC) Delete fails WP:NJOURNALS and WP:GNG. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:24, 4 August 2020 (UTC) Delete for failing WP:NJOURNALS and WP:GNG. I think the...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by creator without reason given, after adding...

(see WP:JWG), but since the journal is indexed in Scopus, it meets WP:NJournals. --Randykitty (talk) 10:43, 17 January 2015 (UTC) Keep The journal's own...

about one particular student article, not the journal. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 14:11, 19 April 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate...

org/indexingjcsb.php[predatory publication]). Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Guillaume2303 (talk) 16:56, 23 October 2012 (UTC) Delete Nice to see...

(talk) 18:24, 2 March 2020 (UTC) Delete. Complete fail of WP:GNG and WP:NJournals. Article creation way WP:TOOSOON. Merging into the NPG article is undesirable...

included in several very selective databases, making this a clear pass of WP:NJournals. The article is in a sorry state, but instead of taking this to AfD, the...

that this journal was listed by Scopus, which makes it a clear meet of NJournals. Note that it has since been discontinued, but also note that notability...

independent sources, not included in any selective databases. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG". Article dePRODded by anonymous IP with no reason stated. PRODreason...

sufficient coverage to establish notability for the journal. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 08:44, 14 February 2013 (UTC)...

10 February 2015 (UTC) Keep Per first AfD (indexed in Scopus, meets WP:NJournals). No idea why the notability tag was not removed after that (was clear...

notability for an academic text. I note also that it even passes the ESSAY WP:NJournals criterias #1, #2 & #3. This journal is notable to and strongly used by...

Social Sciences Citation Index, and MEDLINE, which is a clear pass of WP:NJournals. --Randykitty (talk) 08:35, 15 October 2022 (UTC) Keep Indexing demonstrates...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by artucle creator with reason "Wikipedia...

contents are basically a list of all issues published. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG, hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 20:35, 9 January 2015 (UTC)...

is not a shred of notability. The article meets neither WP:GNG nor WP:NJournals. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:37, 11 September 2016 (UTC) Note:...

in Google Books, but no in-depth independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by creator who posted a justification on...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by creator with reason "nope". PROD reason...

sources, not indexed in any selective major database. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG". Hence: Delete Randykitty (talk) 12:20, 23 August 2013 (UTC)...

I could (given in WP:NJournals and others - more below), and that is what led me to Worldcat - it's right there in WP:NJournals. Saying "nobody has been...

are listed on its website), no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by creator with reason (on talk page): "it...

list (individually, not trough the publisher). Indexed nowhere. Fails WP:NJOURNALS. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 16:52, 26 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

one...) --Guillaume2303 (talk) 10:54, 25 June 2012 (UTC) Note that WP:NJournals is an essay not a guideline or policy (although it confusingly states...

together, I think that this journal at least meets WP:NJOURNALS#C3 and WP:GNG, even if WP:NJOURNALS#C1 is tenuous. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics /...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by article creator with reason "this journal...

Regions there are ways in which specific relevant criteria can be used (WP:NJOURNALS): it is indexed in SJR and ranked 92 out of 253 in development studies...

don't think it fails NJOURNALS. It's indexed in Scopus and EBSCO. Nobody (talk) 14:21, 8 May 2025 (UTC) The remarks from WP:NJOURNALS specifically says Note...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:07, 14 July 2015 (UTC)...

the previous AfD years ago are not convincing either. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 10:48, 24 December 2018 (UTC) Note: This...

either). Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 16:52, 11 November 2014 (UTC) Now it should meet WP:NJournals for criterion 1, having added...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 09:32, 12 April 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG. Though WP:NJOURNALS may apply here, Though this article passes WP:NJOURNALS, I could not find any secondary sources which...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded with reason "Improved the page by adding...

lying about being in the DOAJ (and probably many other things), fails WP:NJOURNALS Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 11:35, 24 June 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

journal have negligible citation scores on Google Scholar. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG, hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:44, 29 December 2013 (UTC)...

of predatory open access publishing. Does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:23, 27 June 2016 (UTC) Note: This...

call for submissions for the second issue of 2015 (!). Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 09:00, 4 June 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

selective databases, no independent third-party sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: Delete. Guillaume2303 (talk) 12:39, 28 October 2012...

independent sources, not indexed in any selective database. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." DePROD edit summary refers to ISSN and independent sources...

selective databases, there are no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Article creation way too soon. --Randykitty (talk) 10:24, 9...

conversant with this criterion yet), but this appears not to satisfy WP:NJOURNALS. As far as I can see, this journal is not indexed in any selective database...

indexing (fails NJournals), modest citation counts (fails NJournals), nothing indicating any historical significance (another fail of NJournals). --Randykitty...

to this page.‎ The result was delete. Noting that not meeting the WP:NJOURNALS or WP:GNG notability criteria is not a comment on the quality of the journal...

no impact factor, and is seldom cited or quoted. Fails WP:NORG and WP:NJOURNALS. Worldbruce (talk) 19:17, 12 January 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

should only be created (even if they are listed here) if they meet WP:NJournals and/or WP:GNG. This list grew out of a discussion where it was felt that...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Article creation too soon." DePRODded by anonymous IP with...

‎ The result was delete. Evidence that the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:NJournals not provided. J04n(talk page) 13:51, 23 February 2013 (UTC) Academicus...

Scopus, CAS, CSA, and many others), has impact factor, and thus meets WP:NJOURNALS with flying colors. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 12:35...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG". Article dePRODded by article creator (SPA) without reason...

an impact factor alone is good enough per WP:NJOURNALS#C1. While not an official guideline, WP:NJOURNALS has been the effective guideline for deciding...

indexed in any Clarivate database, so this is fake. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." DePRODded by article creator, removing the IF and adding some...

--DHeyward (talk) 07:15, 9 January 2013 (UTC) Keep Indexing in AIO, meets WP:NJournals. --Randykitty (talk) 12:06, 11 January 2013 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

is WP:NJournals. While not everybody agrees that meeting NJournals is enough to establish notability, everybody agrees that not meeting NJournals is a...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Article creation way too soon." DePRODded by article creator...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article de-PRODded with reason "extensive article in deWP...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODed by article creator without stated reason...

is hardly ever cited by any other journals. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 11:14, 17 January 2016 (UTC) Note: This...

Ulrich's is not selective in the sense of NJournals. --Randykitty (talk) 18:45, 9 May 2016 (UTC) WP:NJournals has no clear statements with regard to such...

it has a substantial impact factor, hence this convincingly meets WP:NJournals. I'll try to update and expand the article later today. --Randykitty (talk)...

clock is ticking.... 01:43, 7 July 2011 (UTC) Delete does not meet WP:NJOURNALS. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 20:20, 11 July 2011 (UTC)...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:15, 2 March 2016 (UTC)...

premature. Not indexed anywhere, no third-party sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Crusio (talk) 10:15, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate...

independent source, which is just an in-passing mention. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG, hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:05, 3 June 2018 (UTC) Comment...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. (As an aside: I cannot find any other issue apart from the...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded because contested on its talk page. No convincing...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 09:30, 19 January 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate...

the recent critiques of NJOURNALS have been that it is too lenient, that too many non-notable journals are kept based on NJOURNALS arguments. What is less...

should only be created (even if they are listed here) if they meet WP:NJournals and/or WP:GNG. This list grew out of a discussion where it was felt that...

independent sources, not included in any selective databases. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 16:59, 6 December 2012 (UTC) Justification...

selective databases is major and selective. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Guillaume2303 (talk) 17:15, 26 September 2012 (UTC) Keep As explained...

database (nor, apparently, in any other database either). Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:23, 25 October 2013 (UTC)...

should only be created (even if they are listed here) if they meet WP:NJournals and/or WP:GNG. This list grew out of a discussion where it was felt that...

independent source. Article creation premature. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Crusio (talk) 09:49, 31 May 2011 (UTC) Delete - As per nomination. Rcsprinter...

it exists) nor could I find it in Scopus, so I believe this fails WP:NJOURNALS and WP:GNG. It is unsourced, which is why I don't understand it was accepted...

the Modern Language Association Database), so this is a clear meet of NJournals. --Randykitty (talk) 06:58, 4 December 2024 (UTC) Keep per Simon223. The...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." PROD opposed by article creator on talk page with the argument...

should only be created (even if they are listed here) if they meet WP:NJournals and/or WP:GNG. This list grew out of a discussion where it was felt that...

that a trip to the library would reveal sufficient citations to satisfy NJournals criteria 2, "The journal is frequently cited by other reliable sources...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Declined prod based on meeting NJOURNALS (which is an essay). Based on 1 primary source. Article is basically a...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." DePRODded by article creator with reason "it is the only reformed...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded with reason "Created by a prolific contributor"...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 19:03, 10 July 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate...

selectivity required by NJournals. Neither do some routine citations to articles published in this journal indicate notability. Fails WP:NJournals and WP:GNG. --Randykitty...

sources, not indexed in any selective major databases. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 10:22, 15 September 2013 (UTC) Note: This...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Nanosci (talk) 03:57, 28 December 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

for WP:GNG and no WP:RS exist to show that it meets any criteria of WP:NJOURNALS. The three references in the article are identical and the two external...

in Google Books, but no in-depth independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by creator who posted justification on article's...

meets WP:NJournals. --Randykitty (talk) 17:04, 18 August 2013 (UTC) It was in Medline but no longer. Some caveats about Medline in WP:NJournals, not an...

Published by an equally non-notable academic organization. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Guillaume2303 (talk) 21:37, 25 August 2012 (UTC) Note: This...

meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: delete. Changing my !vote to keep, based on Headbomb's findings below: indexing in Scopus meets NJournals. Randykitty...

indexed in any selective database, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. --Randykitty (talk) 17:24, 2 July 2015 (UTC) The above discussion...

count) 17:08, 11 July 2023 (UTC) This should also be judged against WP:NJOURNALS (an essay but widely used). Perhaps someone who follows WikiProject Deletion...

journal thus satisfies notability criteria according to WP:NJournals criterion 1. While WP:NJournals is still technically an essay, in AfD discussions about...

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:04, 27 April 2020 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NJOURNALS. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 12:35, 28 April 2020 (UTC) The above discussion...

Long-established journal, indexed in Scopus amongst others. Easy pass of WP:NJOURNALS. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 01:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Article created WP:TOOSOON" PROD was replaced with a proposal...

user-contributed (and borderline predatory: Index Copernicus). Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." DePRODded by article creator who added a lot of promotional...

Not indexed in any major selective database. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Guillaume2303 (talk) 20:52, 15 October 2012 (UTC) Delete on the grounds...

but this is far too less to indicate any notability. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 06:47, 23 March 2017 (UTC)...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." PROD reason still stands, hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk)...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Article creation way WP:TOOSOON." Article dePRODded by creator...

trivial library catalog entries, or not independent. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article undeleted upon request with promise to improve article...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by article creator, who has posted a justification...

don't even exist yet. Article creation vastly premature. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Article dePRODded with reason "The announcement of these journals...

new, journal. Not indexed in any selective databases. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." DePRODded with reason "im contesting deletion since several...

08:04, 12 August 2023 (UTC) Delete - Non-notable journal, fails GNG and NJOURNALS. The Twitter sources cited are pretty obviously not reliable or independent...

journal's own website on the UNC Dept. of History website). Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 18:37, 5 January 2018 (UTC) Keep, journal...

inclusion in the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) is enough to meet WP:NJournals. However, as far as I can see from ESCI's inclusion criteria, these are...

but in any case, just a list, no in-depth coverage). Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 06:12, 18 April 2016 (UTC) Delete: I'm not...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. --Randykitty (talk) 13:25, 7 April 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate...

17:44, 15 July 2020 (UTC) Keep indexed in Scopus since 2011, passes WP:NJOURNALS. Ranks #295/606 in Philosophy (not that this would ever make it a WP:RS)...

WP:GNG and WP:NJOURNAL, mainly because it's too soon for them to be notable. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:30, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NJournals and WP:GNG...

There are no third party sources either. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals." DePRODded by SPA editor with edit summary: "DOAJ added". DOAJ is not...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 21:09, 18 August 2019 (UTC)...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 09:07, 7 January 2015 (UTC)...

notability. I will also comment that the reason quoted for deprodding (WP:NJOURNALS#2) makes no sense to me. Not only is that an essay, not policy, this is...

notability. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. --Randykitty (talk) 11:12, 26 July 2023 (UTC) Delete - Fails GNG/NJOURNALS. It does not appear to be listed...

http://science.thomsonreuters.com/mjl/). No independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Guillaume2303 (talk) 14:20, 23 October 2012 (UTC) Delete. I...

which have cited an article published in this journal. Does not pass WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 17:34, 1 November 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:DEL8: Not notable, does not meet WP:NJOURNALS or WP:GNG. This publication should not be confused with Chinese Historical...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by article creator whoc claims notability...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by article creator with reason given on...

Eduemoni↑talk↓ 02:18, 15 July 2013 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NJournals. --Randykitty (talk) 12:12, 15 July 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

TWL) Indexed almost nowhere, listed on Beall's list, no impact. Fails WP:NJOURNALS and WP:GNG. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 03:23, 3 February 2019 (UTC) Note:...

sources, not covered in any selective major databases. does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." It was de-PRODded with comments on the talk page asserting...

20 October 2012 (UTC) Delete WP:TOOSOON. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 09:39, 20 October 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate...

23:32, 29 May 2022 (UTC) Delete as journals listed here doesn't pass WP:NJournals. ~ Nanosci (talk) 12:41, 30 May 2022 (UTC) Delete per above. --mikeu talk...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded after addition of some trivial/non-independent...

discriminative major databases. No independent sources. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals Crusio (talk) 10:23, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Delete. May become notable in...

none of them very selective. No independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 17:22, 22 March 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate...

academic journals, according to WP:WikiProject Academic Journals, is WP:NJOURNALS. That guideline suggests that being reindexed by selective indices or...

indexed in any selective database, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." It was de-PRODded by User:Headbomb with reason"plenty of databases"...

TWL) Non-notable journal. Article creation premature. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG Guillaume2303 (talk) 05:29, 14 September 2012 (UTC) Note: This...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. De-PRODded by IP without specific reason stated. PROD reasons...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded with reason "(Copernicus journals have a...

sources, not included in any selective major databases. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Crusio (talk) 18:18, 31 August 2011 (UTC) Delete - Policy reasoning...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 04:42, 1 August 2015 (UTC)...

have disappeared without a trace after only a handful of issues. Fails NJournals and GNG. --Randykitty (talk) 11:31, 23 January 2021 (UTC) The above discussion...

any selective major databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Note that this is a different publication from the journal...

on it; it should not be returned to the mainspace unless it meets WP:NJournals. JohnCD (talk) 15:06, 24 January 2010 (UTC) Majlesi Journal of Electrical...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." I figure that still holds true, and should prompt a second...

selective index) and several les selective indices, so this meets WP:NJournals. --Randykitty (talk) 14:02, 20 October 2023 (UTC) Merge to SCMS Cochin...

reference is to YouTube. No indication of any notability, does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 18:57, 27 August 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate...

(talk) 17:54, 5 March 2011 (UTC) Keep The other Critical Reviews meet WP:NJOURNALS and I don't see what's different with this one. Headbomb {talk / contribs...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 16:52, 15 January 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

target. XOR'easter (talk) 16:18, 17 December 2019 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NJOURNALS. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 05:17, 20 December 2019 (UTC) The above discussion...

do so. Being a stub is not a criterion for deletion per WP:DEL. At WP:NJournals, under the Caveats section point 2, the journal's homepage may be used...

creator without any reason. Article creation premature, does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Crusio (talk) 18:03, 22 January 2011 (UTC) Delete At the very...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." DePRODded with reason "in Project Muse. Such journals are...

and as you note, the citation record is more than meager, so this fails NJournals". I noted that " The journal uses the obsolete submission system (by email...

22:53, 5 January 2014 (UTC) Keep Indexed in Scopus and hence meeting WP:NJournals. --Randykitty (talk) 23:28, 5 January 2014 (UTC) Keep per Randykitty's...

sources, not indexed in any selective database. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals." It was de-PRODded by the article creator who added text indicating that...

sources, not listed in any selective major database. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. As for the "journals covered", WP:NOTINHERITED obviously applies...

lists nothing. Not indexed anywhere, no independent sources: misses WP:NJournals and WP:GNG. --Randykitty (talk) 16:38, 5 December 2019 (UTC) Delete this...

Article needs expansion (see WP:JWG), but the journal clearly meets WP:NJournals. --Randykitty (talk) 17:53, 6 November 2019 (UTC) Randykitty, Withdrawing...

provides any evidence of passing WP:GNG (the controlling guideline) nor WP:NJOURNALS. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:08, 30 July 2024 (UTC) Delete I searched Google...

selective databases, nor did I find any independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 17:14, 18 July 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

to be indexed are selective, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded with reason "MLA is the most selective index...

less and less selective, inclusion in it is usually taken as meeting WP:NJournals. BTW, Beall did not say this publisher was "junk", just that the journals...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 21:37, 24 December 2015 (UTC) Delete. As...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 12:36, 28 August 2014 (UTC) Added independent...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Journal that fails WP:NJOURNALS and WP:GNG. 1900-5121, its ISSN, does not turn up any results at MIAR...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 19:14, 16 February 2015 (UTC)...

premature. References do not even mention the journal. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 20:00, 20 September 2013 (UTC) Note: This...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded with reason "deprod, this desevers an AfD...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals". Article dePRODded by article creator (who is director of the organisation...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." DePRODded with reason "Is indexed in some selective databases...

January 2023 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NJOURNALS, and DOAJ is certainly not selective in the sense of WP:NJOURNALS#C1 (see note 1b in particular). Headbomb...

database, nor are there any independent sources. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 12:56, 11 June 2015 (UTC) Note: This...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by article creator without reason given...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." DePRODded by IP with stated reason "Article meets requirements...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded without reason given. PROD reason still...

Washington and Lee rankings with a combined score of 0. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODed by article creator without reason given....

in any selective databases, no independent reliable sources. Misses WP:NJournals and WP:GNG. --Randykitty (talk) 08:51, 31 August 2021 (UTC) The above...

selective major database, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals, hence: Delete. Guillaume2303 (talk) 14:42, 1 September 2012 (UTC) Delete...

Not indexed in any selective major database. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 17:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate...

indexed in any selective database, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. --Randykitty (talk) 17:20, 2 July 2015 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

independent notability, the journal does not appear to meet either WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Merge to Shakespeare Fellowship (including the infobox) seems like an...

Architecture, has an ISI impact factor and therefore satisfies criteria 1 of NJournals. I also found this. James500 (talk) 05:43, 25 August 2014 (UTC) Relisted...

does not even list an ISSN), no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG" and (apart from the -trivial- ISSN) still stands. Hence: delete...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 09:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)...

20:03, 20 October 2022 (UTC) Keep. Indexed in Scopus, which meets WP:NJournals. Article needs a lot of work, but that's not a reason to delete. --Randykitty...

databases that include it are selective enough to make this qualify under WP:NJournals. It would appear to be most logical to include a few lines on the journal...

covered in any selective major databases. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 09:38, 2 December 2011 (UTC) Delete: Non-notable...

in 2010. Not notable yet, article creation premature. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Crusio (talk) 06:59, 24 April 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate...

neither of which seems to have generated much interest. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Crusio (talk) 20:34, 21 April 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate...

published a single issue. No independent sources. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 23:17, 7 November 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 15:09, 22 April 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate...

Reuters Master Journal List. No independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 17:14, 25 April 2013 (UTC) Keep:The journal...

indexed in any selective database, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. --Randykitty (talk) 17:18, 2 July 2015 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." DePRODded by article creator with reason "We are indexed in...

either WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Rhadow (talk) 00:27, 22 February 2023 (UTC) Delete per above: the article currently fails WP:GNG and WP:NJOURNAL. InterstellarGamer12321...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded with reason "The page should not be deleted...

is rather promotional in tone. As far as I can tell, it fails both WP:NJournals and WP:GNG. Fyddlestix (talk) 21:19, 6 July 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate...

rationale "I think it may fail NJOURNAL but pas GNG based on coverage linked." I disagree, this fails both WP:GNG and WP:NJOURNALS Headbomb {t · c · p · b}...

(with independent reference), which generally is taken as satisfying WP:NJournals#C1. --Randykitty (talk) 14:12, 5 December 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...

the journal is not included in any selective database. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Guillaume2303 (talk) 12:15, 22 September 2012 (UTC) Note: This...

very modest citation record, no independent sources. Misses WP:GNG andWP:NJournals. --Randykitty (talk) 21:21, 9 April 2021 (UTC) Delete Not enough indepth...

ROAD is not selective either), no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 09:49, 16 January 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

the main problem. The coverage is not enough to satisfy either GNG or NJOURNALS. Harvard is Harvard. PARAKANYAA (talk) 20:47, 25 April 2025 (UTC) I am...

independent sources, not listed in any selective database. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: Delete. Guillaume2303 (talk) 14:17, 11 November 2012...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 15:43, 26 September 2016 (UTC) Note: This...

would very much surprise me that this publication is not notable under WP:NJOURNALS, particularly Criterion 3. However, I haven't heard of it before today...

them WP mirrors, the rest apparently fairly trivial. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Guillaume2303 (talk) 18:40, 6 December 2011 (UTC) Note: This...

notable, but I just checked its homepage and see enough to satisfy WP:NJournals (will update the Numen article later). --Randykitty (talk) 15:38, 28 September...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." DePRODded by article creator without reason stated. PROD reason...

WP:NJOURNALS". DePRODed with reason "Removed PD/D tag so we can improve article to meet standards". However, WP:BEFORE suggests that neither NJournals nor...

Comment there is WP:NJOURNAL which is the relevant test here, not WP:GNG. Power~enwiki (talk) 20:01, 25 May 2017 (UTC) WP:NJOURNAL is an essay; WP:GNG...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 09:12, 25 April 2015 (UTC)...

contains some predatory journals). No independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 09:32, 28 February 2019 (UTC) Note: This...

means that they found it influential. It's a bit minimal, but it meets NJournals. --Randykitty (talk) 20:26, 16 April 2019 (UTC) Keep Being indexed in...

Is commercial and fails User:Joe Decker/IsThisNotable and fails WP:NJOURNALS. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:38, 29 June 2018 (UTC) Delete Blatant advertising...

(talk) 15:15, 15 September 2015 (UTC) Delete. No evidence of passing WP:NJournals. See my longer response at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of...

editing, no independent sources seem to exist. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. --Randykitty (talk) 14:40, 8 January 2017 (UTC) Soft delete I just did...

entry meets both WP:NJournals and WP:GNG. To be clear, this editor argues to keep the Digital Law Asia entry. Reasons under WP:NJournals The criteria here...

listed in any major, selective databases. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Guillaume2303 (talk) 16:05, 28 February 2012 (UTC) Delete - That's OCLC 774086872...

criteria. NJournals is an essay, but it is designed to make it easier for journals to meet our notability criteria. If a journal does not meet NJournals, it...

That is not, however, the coverage that satisfies WP:GNG, WP:WEB, or WP:NJournals for that matter. (This is indeed not an academic journal, but even if...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NJOURNALS. As far as I can tell, this is a predatory journal, effectively cited...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 12:08, 28 August 2016 (UTC)...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. At best a case of WP:TOOSOON." I agree with this, however,...

November 2025 (UTC) Comment: could you please indicate how this meets WP:NJournals? --Randykitty (talk) 09:33, 28 November 2025 (UTC) @Randykitty: For C1...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 08:25, 14 May 2015 (UTC) Note:...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article creation WP:TOOSOON. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk)...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article de-PRODed with reason "Numerous incoming wiklinks...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 08:56, 4 June 2015 (UTC) Delete...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. (Note that the "impact factors" listed on the journal's website...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by anonymous IP with reason: "False and...

(talk) 15:23, 15 September 2015 (UTC) Delete. No evidence of passing WP:NJournals. See my longer response at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 09:11, 13 December 2015 (UTC) Note: This...

cited are a news release and the journal's own website). Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 11:17, 19 February 2016 (UTC) Note: This...

journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no sources. Does meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." The article claims that the journal is indexed in PubMed....

only shows that it exists and does not provide evidence of passing WP:NJournals. Re the nominator's remarks about the reputation of the publisher: it...

databases (ESCI is not selective), no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:57, 24 February 2018 (UTC)...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by article creator without reason given...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG Randykitty (talk) 15:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate...

selective database, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 09:28, 14 February 2015 (UTC) Note:...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 15:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate...

possibly be notable yet. Article creation premature, does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Crusio (talk) 13:40, 22 February 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.". Article dePRODded with reason "any new journal produced by...

biased towards locally-produced publications). Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 11:25, 27 April 2015 (UTC) Note: This...

created by the journal's production manager. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Article creation way too soon. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 12:47...

predatory open access publisher that is on Beall's list. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.". DePRODded by article creator without stated reason. PROD...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is a non-notable journal that fails WP:GNG and WP:NJOURNALS. I originally redirected the article back to the organization that publishes...

Multidisciplinary" it still ranks in the upper third (48 out of 167). Meets WP:NJournals. I have added the foregoing IF and ranking info to the article (with ref)...

these databases are selective and major, both requirements to fulfill WP:NJournals. Perhaps somebody who knows this field better can tell us this. --Crusio...

The journal does not exist yet and does not satisfy either WP:N or WP:NJournals. Not indexed anywhere, no subscriptions or library holdings, no ISSN number...

Index Expanded and (since it's listed in SCImago) Scopus, so it meets WP:NJournals (see here). --Randykitty (talk) 11:22, 2 December 2020 (UTC) Keep as argued...

don't find any indication that this journal meets either WP:GNG or WP:NJournals, so expanding and moving to main space is not an option. In fact, it looks...

currently included is the "Bibliography of Asian Studies"). Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Crusio (talk) 18:27, 31 August 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate...

major databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:57, 19 December 2012 (UTC) As the...

sources, not indexed in any selective database. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals." DePRODDed by anonymous IP with reason "has filed application for ISSN...

article yet: creation of a WP article is premature. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: delete. Crusio (talk) 09:21, 12 July 2011 (UTC) Delete...

our standard guideline is WP:GNG not WP:NJournals. Stuartyeates (talk) 11:30, 23 July 2011 (UTC) WP:NJournals has been used for journals for well over...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 18:29, 23 July 2015 (UTC)...

(talk) 15:23, 15 September 2015 (UTC) Delete. No evidence of passing WP:NJournals. See my longer response at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of...

probable predatory scholarly open-access journals". Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by creator without reason stated. PROD reason...

MEDLINE), so this is a clear meet of WP:NJournals. --Randykitty (talk) 21:49, 13 October 2023 (UTC) Randykitty NJOURNALS is an essay, it doesn‘t have the broad...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by anonymous IP without reason stated. PROD...

verification (not in the journal list linked here). Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. --Randykitty (talk) 15:52, 31 May 2016 (UTC) Are ESCI (Web of Science...

to find it in selective indexes. It seems to fail both WP:GNG and WP:NJournals. There seems to be a Springer journal with a similar name, this one is...

some good sources (even in Ukrainian) crop up, this does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. --Randykitty (talk) 15:18, 6 October 2013 (UTC) delete None...

look at WP:NJournals to see what is needed. Alternatively, any subject that meets WP:GNG (regardless of whether or not it meets NJournals) is considered...

any database and Google only renders a Facebook page. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. --Randykitty (talk) 10:49, 31 December 2013 (UTC) Redirect...

catalogs, no independent sources are available. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Guillaume2303 (talk) 15:40, 4 September 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 10:15, 28 April 2014 (UTC) the journal itself...

(GS aims to cover everything and is not selective). Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 08:20, 30 April 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate...

independent sources, not included in any selective databases. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." It's still not indexed anywhere and no independent sources...

paragraph in the LA Times), but no in-depth coverage. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 16:30, 29 March 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 08:39, 3 February 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by editor who added names of board members...

specific guidance on the notability of academic journals. An essay, WP:NJOURNALS, exists, however, no argument was advanced that this journal meets it...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 11:41, 8 April 2014 (UTC)...

Ffranc (talk) 12:33, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Keep, indexed in Scopus, meets WP:NJOURNALS. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 14:12, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Keep as per Headbomb...

in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." DePRODded by anonymous IP without stated reason. PROD reason...

to be improved." Of course, none of this addresses the criteria in WP:NJournals. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:37, 4 September 2013 (UTC) Comment I managed...

not indexed in any major selective database: does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Guillaume2303 (talk) 13:12, 24 July 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

(talk) 15:23, 15 September 2015 (UTC) Delete. No evidence of passing WP:NJournals. See my longer response at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of...