DOKUMEN123.COM

should generally follow it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. Shortcuts WP:NFILMWP:NFILM WP:NFWP:NF...

meet WP:NFILM. Onel5969 TT me 16:28, 25 July 2021 (UTC) Speedy delete: per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 18:35, 26 July 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILMS Nitesh003...

sources that discuss the film non-trivially. Does not pass WP:GNG and WP:NFILMS. --Ashleyyoursmile! 19:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC) Delete The movie has not...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable porn film. No evidence it passes WP:NFILMS. Cavarrone (talk) 22:11, 15 December 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILMS Jenyire2 22:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

considerations aside, "if" these awards are verifiable this film would pass WP:NFILMS. Cavarrone (talk) 20:00, 3 August 2012 (UTC) Keep per WP:HEY, in accordance...

other edits outside this topic. Comment. While various "keep" votes cite NFILMS #3, there is no verifiable support for the notion that the various honors...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) May not fulfill WP:NFILMS. Sources, when translated into English, seem to be mostly news of its release...

sorry Gshrotriya but there's a clear consensus that this doesn't meet WP:NFILMS at this time. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:00, 17 April 2011 (UTC) Bhobhar - The...

TWL) Newly released film. No evidence that it satisfies any aspects of WP:NFILMS. PROD declined without explanation by a single purpose account that is likely...

reliable sources to indicate that this film has had any coverage to pass WP:NFILMS. It was deproded by the original author, and after being reprodded by a...

that flies in the face of NFILMS here. --DBigXrayᗙ 16:05, 17 November 2018 (UTC) Special notability guidelines, such as NFILMS, are alternatives to the...

directory WP:DIR. NFILMS does not really apply to awards ceremonies so it was not necessary for me to bring NFILMS into the nomination. NFILMS applies to films...

based on my review of the references above and in the article. passess WP:NFILMS per 2 notable actors and coverage in media. User:GSS Can you write a table...

unsourced; stub; will release in 2019. Doesn't seem to pass either WP:GNG or WP:NFILMS. Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 00:11, 4 October 2018 (UTC); edited...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Contested PROD that fails both WP:N and WP:NFILMS. According to the official website, this film was screened at two minor...

(UTC) Redirect to Kanshi Ram: Movie is not notable on its own. it fails WP:NFILMS. The article on the subject of the biopic can have a couple of lines about...

the two AVN wins for Best Gonzo Series should be enough for it to pass WP:NFILMS. Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 11:38, 21 February 2013...

(UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 12:24, 12 July 2021 (UTC) Strong Delete Found only one trivial mention. Fails WP:NFILMS Mehmood.Husain (talk)...

references were found there's no assertion of notability in the article per WP:NFILMS. Filing Flunky (talk) 14:07, 1 December 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

award appears to be from a minor and local horror film festival. Fails WP:NFILMS. Steamroller Assault (talk) 23:37, 6 July 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

July 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM DonaldD23 talk to me 13:19, 30 July 2021 (UTC) Delete - does not pass WP:NFILMS and WP:GNG. Google search turned...

this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:25, 27 April 2021 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:NFILMS and WP:GNG. I'm seeing lack of substantial coverage in multiple reliable...

seemingly user-moderated site. Doesn't seem to qualify either WP:GNG or WP:NFILMS. P.S. — A draft of the same name exists at Draft:Target (2018 film). Regards...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A porno series that appears to not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NFILMS. No notable contributions to the genre. Only one significant award (Best...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I can't find much to say this article do meet WP:NFILMS. Redirect can be better just that I can't find where. Safari ScribeEdits...

film's box-office performance: Daily Pakistan These are sufficient for WP:NFILMS and WP:GNG. --Skr15081997 (talk) 13:03, 29 June 2017 (UTC) Keep – Meets...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to meet WP:NFILMS. Singularity42 (talk) 02:19, 14 July 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

released then article can be re created. As of now this film does not pass WP:NFILMS and the article should be deleted. No point in sending to draft as nothing...

notability. Nate • (chatter) 07:25, 4 August 2009 (UTC) Keep. Easily passes WP:NFILMS, with several reviews, notable director, notable producer, notable writers...

(UTC) Keep I've added several cites about the movie. It also fulfills WP:NFILMS. It was re-released at a film festival and has been the subject of critical...

with this not passing NFILM. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 23:28, 30 July 2021 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:NFILMS and WP:GNG. Except the...

Delete per nom, a non-notable movie, fails NFILM. Kolma8 (talk) 20:58, 3 February 2021 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:NFILMS. Ashleyyoursmile! 13:25, 4 February 2021...

NFILMS vary by a mile and at any case, you ought to know that other stuff exists.~ Winged BladesGodric 03:47, 26 April 2018 (UTC) Keep--Passes NFILMS...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No source cited. Fails WP:NFILMS Jenyire2 20:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

be Africa's highest film honour, If so, this film would seem to meet WP:NFILMS#Other_evidence_of_notability criterion "The film has received a major award...

people who place work in the public domain, but this fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILMS. Upload it to commons and call it a day. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 03:14, 22 December...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails GNG and NFILMS. Heart (talk) 02:12, 3 June 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

FOARP (talk) 08:36, 23 June 2020 (UTC) Nice find, I knew it likely passes NFILMS, but I wasn't ready to invest time into finding sources. HandsomeBoy (talk)...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of notability meeting WP:NFILMS; content largely uncited; closest to RSes are a pile of reviews saying it's...

release at New Year's, other wikis, and film database sites. Seems to fail WP:NFILM. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

writers names. Wgolf (talk) 16:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NFILMS Flat Out let's discuss it 12:42, 1 April 2015 (UTC) Keep: Three of the items...

porncruft. It clearly fails WP:NFILM. Porn industry sources count for little since the deprecation of WP:PORNBIO, and NFILM is not met with what we have...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Lack of independent reliable resources. does not pass WP:NFILM Priyanjali singh (talk) 07:16, 2 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

13:00, 9 February 2018 (UTC) Delete fails to satisfy the criteria under WP:NFILMS or WP:GNG. Dan arndt (talk) 14:29, 9 February 2018 (UTC) Deleteas per nom...

JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. The general WP:NFILM notability guideline states: "If a topic has received significant...

criterion 3 of NFILM. and was endorsed by User:Donaldd23 and User:Kolma8. PROD removed without providing a reason nor addressing any of the NFILM or GNG concerns...

directory-like listing for an unremarkable film series. Does not meet WP:NFILM and significant RS coverage not found. Awards are not significant. First...

JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews found in a BEFORE. Previously deleted via PROD in 2009 for failing WP:NFILM. Article was recreated in 2017...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

JSTOR · TWL) This was previously up for deletion via PROD for failing WP:NFILM but was removed with reason Notable article --- Released malayalam movie...

third-party reviews. No sources cited other than IMDb. Clearly fails WP:NFILM. Numberguy6 (talk) 01:44, 12 January 2023 (UTC) Delete - I find no significant...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NFILM and significant RS coverage not found. Awards are not significant. K.e.coffman...

this film hasn't started . It is a WP:TOOSOON case. The articles fails WP:NFILMS. Skr15081997 (talk) 13:01, 9 April 2014 (UTC) Redirect redirect to director...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film. Fails WP:GNG & WP:NFILMS. Lack of significant coverage of reliable sources. — Zawl 10:59, 3 February...

notability. A WP:BEFORE search came back with nothing in line with WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:44, 14 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't qualify WP:NFILMS. Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 06:05, 31 March 2018 (UTC) Note:...

like as Category! A porno series that appears to not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NFILMS Guilherme Burn (talk) 11:36, 28 March 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film, fails WP:NFILM as only things found in a WP:BEFORE are film database sites, promotional...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

fails WP:NFILM Spiderone 20:15, 25 September 2020 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 20:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM. KidAd...

complete lack of in-depth coverage for this movie to show that it passes WP:NFILMS. I just don't see where this is ultimately notable and considering that...

(talk) 18:21, 13 December 2012 (UTC) Delete As PROD endorser. Fails WP:NFILMS so badly that I feel dizzy. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:33, 13 December 2012...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:NFILMS or WP:GNG - seems to be WP:TOOSOON Boleyn (talk) 07:12, 11 April 2013 (UTC)...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication as to why this was deprodded, so Fails WP:NFILM, no sources here or to be found. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:42, 6 September...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. A BEFORE search did not reveal reliable sources. I don't find...

not seeing evidence of attained WP:NFILM notability. AllyD (talk) 06:54, 26 July 2021 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE...

a major award is more than likely going to receive coverage. That's why NFILMS has major awards in there. The same is not true for many awards. Hyper local...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Lacks WP:NFILM and WP:SIGCOV Jenyire2 11:41, 10 February 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film. Fails WP:GNG & WP:NFILMS. Lack of significant coverage of reliable sources. — Zawl 11:13, 3 February...

appear to have any reviews or significant coverage, so meets neither WP:NFILM nor WP:GNG. I do note that it has received an award and a nomination but...

notability. Fails WP:GNG. - MrX 17:10, 9 July 2014 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:NFILMS. Lugia2453 (talk) 17:59, 9 July 2014 (UTC) Coupla comments: Is TorrentFreak...

article from a site - [1] and a few passing mentions, it therefore fails WP:NFILMS.Hzh (talk) 14:56, 20 June 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

the article should not be moved back into mainspace before meeting WP:NFILMS has been ascertained. (non-admin closure) Randykitty (talk) 14:16, 13 March...

Prodded, but was removed without any reason given. Fails WP:GNG, and WP:NFILM. Nothing significant shows up in a BEFORE search (for Ramayan Mitzoid, to...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing of substance was found in a WP:BEFORE that could help support...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film, fail of WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. nearlyevil665 11:41, 27 April 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Lot of PR stuff, but does not appear to meet WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 14:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILMS and WP:GNG Jenyire2 06:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

2021 (UTC) Keep, not only does it meet WP:GNG, but it easily passes WP:NFILM as well. There is a Variety review cited in the article [[1]], and there...

is listed but not commented on, and a music credit for R.E.M.. Fails WP:NFILMS, WP:GNG. Yappy2bhere (talk) 06:55, 10 February 2010 (UTC) Keep. I can't...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I don't believe this short film meets WP:NFILM. I wasn't able to find any sources on my initial BEFORE search for PROD...

TWL) Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help this pass WP:NFILM. PROD removed by article creator without adding any explanation or citations...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NFILM, no reviews found in a BEFORE. PROD removed with "deprod; may be notable;...

September 2021 (UTC) Delete: Fails GNG/NFILM. Kolma8 (talk) 21:59, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Delete. Fails GNG and NFILM. 4meter4 (talk) 23:23, 22 September...

result was delete due to lack of significant coverage failing to meet WP:NFILM and WP:GNG Seddon talk 23:18, 12 September 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New...

discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:21, 7 July 2021 (UTC) Delete, fails NFILM and maybe GNG. I found no coverage outside of tv listings and databases...

wikiquote template there that leads nowhere. I don't believe this meets WP:NFILMS. §FreeRangeFrog 00:06, 2 December 2012 (UTC) Delete If not a hoax, possibly...

Tigraan (talk) 12:18, 17 February 2015 (UTC) Delete: fails WP:WEB and WP:NFILMS. "This short film was released on June 30,2014 on Youtube and Facebook By...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and the WP:GNG. Significant RS coverage not found, what comes up is passing...

discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:22, 27 June 2021 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:NFILM – Kickstarter is of course a sell-added project on a fundraiser and the...

about a non-notable film, with no RS mentions found; fails WP:GNG / WP:NFILM. Previous PROD was removed by creating editor without leaving a comment...

reviews could be considered "nationally known critics" as required by WP:NFILM. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 00:00, 1 August 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. ––FormalDude (talk) 14:42, 18 December 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

I can't find anything to show that this short film ultimately passes WP:NFILM. The film seems to exist, but it hasn't received any coverage in reliable...

be made to this page.‎ The result was no consensus. Whether it passes WP:NFILM isn't a sure thing, but after nearly a month of discussion there seems to...

incubated solely because it was expected that upon release it would pass WP:NFILMS. Well, a quick look around Google indicates that significant coverage never...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A porno series that appears to not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NFILMS based on WP:BEFORE and reference present in article. TheSandDoctor (talk)...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM as not a single review is available for the film. Also fails WP:SIGCOV Chirota...

now recreated by the original creator. However, this fails WP:GNG or WP:NFILM, it has a IMDb link (non-RS, non-SIGCOV) and a database-like entry with...

08:32, 26 September 2016 (UTC) Delete: appears to be failing WP:GNG and WP:NFILMS. Anup [Talk] 22:44, 30 September 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

anything to suggest it passes either WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. Delete - No notability and completely fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 05:37, 29 March...

marketing. Only independent sources here are capsule reviews. Fails WP:NFILM and is probably eligible for WP:G11 given the WP:PUFFERY. – FenixFeather...

this page.‎ The result was delete. Clear consensus that this film fails WP:NFILM. Just Chilling (talk) 22:26, 18 July 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

independent references. Current refs include a cast listing. Does not meet WP:NFILMS I, Jethrobot drop me a line 21:48, 29 June 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews or anything other than film database sites, videos, and other...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE Kolma8 (talk) 15:20, 9 January...

WP:SK1 and subsequent discussion shows consensus that the film meets both WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (t • c) 11:36, 2 May 2019 (UTC)...

[1][2][3][4], and there are reviews - [5][6][7][8], should qualify under WP:NFILMS. Hzh (talk) 16:35, 5 July 2018 (UTC) Withdraw in the light of the reviews...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Delete for now as failing WP:NFILM. We can revisit after the release date in June, but we can't keep the AfD...

actor. —Cryptic 15:34, 17 February 2015 (UTC)) Delete: fail WP:WEB and WP:NFILMS. Dai Pritchard (talk) 16:22, 17 February 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILMS and the GNG. No nontrivial coverage, no sourcing. PB videos have been treated...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet any of the WP:NFILMS criteria and only has local secondary coverage. Cassandra 73 (talk) 16:28...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another copycat film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. PROD was removed saying that many sources exist, but I wasn't able to find anything to pass GNG and NFILM. Kolma8 (talk) 15:09...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

making WP:NFILM criteria 1 likely met. WP:NFILM criteria 2 is not satisfied but that is not mandatory, given WP:GNG is definitely met and WP:NFILM criteria...

search failed to even reveal the plot, beyond this passing mention. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 17:48, 6 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:NFOE. Lack of detailed reviews in reliable media. The references...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILMS; 3rd place award in the student section of a film festival does not make...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: Unsourced. Kolma8 (talk) 18:25, 20 December 2020...

site of an animated film festival that does not have a WP page. Fails WP:NFILMS. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)talk to me!see my work 20:12, 7 November...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This doesn't appear to meet any of the criteria at WP:NFILMS. Being shown at various film festivals is not enough to show notability...

2016 (UTC) Strong delete for lack of notability and for failing GNG and NFILMS. Whatever it will be released in months, in years or maybe never is the...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. The only reference in the article that speaks of the film in any detail...

references. No sources. Just an extended plot summary for a porn film that fails NFILMS and the GNG. All GNews and GBooks hits are spurious or, at best, trivial/passing...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:NFILMS, prob a hoax Tassedethe (talk) 22:29, 30 June 2010 (UTC) Delete. Appears...

7-12, 1987), The Philadelphia Enquire (May 12, 1988). Enough to pass WP:NFILMS. Cavarrone (talk) 21:26, 19 March 2012 (UTC) Keep Found same sources as...

routine coverage, and WP:BEFORE failed to find anything that demonstrated GNG/NFILM. I don't speak Telugu, which is holding me back from declaring this at PROD...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE that I was able to find. The...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG as nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE that I can find. PROD was removed...

directory-like listing for an unremarkable film series. Does not meet WP:NFILM and significant RS coverage not found. Awards are not significant. First...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. (non-admin closure) AmirŞah 11:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box]...

would show that this has received any coverage that would show it passes WP:NFILMS. It's pretty much your standard non-notable mass produced horror film. Tokyogirl79...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Film appears to fail WP:NFILM as it does not appear to have received any coverage in independent, reliable...

WP:GNG and WP:NFILM so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:25, 13 September 2020 (UTC) Keep. passes WP:NFILM.Pharaoh of the...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails NFILM and the GNG, and violates WP:NOTDIR. "Best Solo Release" (aka something...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence that WP:NFILM is met. (Disputed PROD). SmartSE (talk) 17:10, 12 December 2011 (UTC) Delete...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, and lacks reliable sources. I searched, but couldn't find. Kailash29792...

December 2020 (UTC) Delete per nom. Fails WP:NFILM. Kolma8 (talk) 10:39, 1 January 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 14:39, 1 January 2021 (UTC)...

2016. A WP:BEFORE search turned up nothing, not even the plot. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 21:56, 31 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

NFILM, and after some searching I could not find any reliable coverage of this. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 01:46, 29 June 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM...

Keep - Obvious keep. Regardless of the current sourcing, the film meets WP:NFILM. #1 to be exact, as the film was widely distributed and has received full-length...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film with only 1 review found, but WP:NFILM requires 2 reviews. No others found. Tagged for notability since January...

passing mentions.[1][2][3] Fails WP:NFILM. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:23, 9 July 2021 (UTC) Delete per above, fails NFILM. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 19:00, 10 July...

(UTC) Delete - not notable per WP:NFILM. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 17:15, 29 December 2020 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 14:56, 1 January...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article fails WP:NFILM and does not have any references. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 08:16, 4 October 2022...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. Kolma8 (talk) 16:59, 25 May...

Non-notable. The creator is blocked for using multiple accounts. Fails GNG/NFILM. Kolma8 (talk) 21:57, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Delete: I don't think just...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG; article was sent to draft by User:CommanderWaterford about half...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NFILM, nothing found in a BEFORE except database sites. DonaldD23 talk to me 02:33...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

TWL) Can't find any reviews, or other evidence that the movie passes WP:NFILM. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 19:44, 20 October 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Film appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing was found in a BEFORE to meets the notability guidelines. DonaldD23...

Fails WP:NFF due to lack of information about production, and fails WP:NFILM by defaut as no sources have been produced to assert the film's encyclopedic...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, and lacks reliable sources. I searched, but only found passing mention...

Times, and a blog which hints that the film made little impact. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 15:01, 5 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. No references. Thanks, Kolma8 (talk) 16:39, 20 December 2020...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) May not meet WP:NFILM notability. Also no references used. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping...

TWL) I can't find any reviews nor any indication of meeting WP:GNG or WP:NFILM in searches relating to this film. It does not appear to meet any of the...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, and lacks reliable sources. I searched, but couldn't find any except this...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

a single reference only providing cast and crew info. Does not meet WP:NFILMS I, Jethrobot drop me a line 21:47, 29 June 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No claim to notability. Fails WP: NFILMS. Admiral Caius (talk) 18:01, 14 January 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

not properly referenced as having any notability claim that would pass WP:NFILM. As always, every film is not automatically entitled to have a Wikipedia...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

this page. The result was redirect‎ to List of Hindi films of 1962. if NFILMS needs updating to reflect the working consensus, please open that discussion...

pack, "We invite you to hear this"). The listing at BFI is empty. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 20:18, 1 December 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM Legacypac (talk) 22:29, 28 May 2017 (UTC) Keep has reviews in reliable sources...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable parody film. No coverage that would meet WP:NFILM. DePRODed because of the involvement of Vanilla Ice, but my WP:BEFORE found...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing of substance was found in a WP:BEFORE that could help support...

this page.‎ The result was delete. Unanimity that all three films fail WP:NFILM. Just Chilling (talk) 22:51, 20 July 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

per WP:NFILM. This article has zero sources. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC) Delete non notable fan film that fails WP:NFILM. Donaldd23...

JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to pass WP:NFILM. Donaldd23 (talk) 16:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM. Only thing found besides database entries and videos was the article that...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Nothing in my WP:BEFORE search shows that this passes WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. It is a short video released by Leicester City Council but there...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) no evidence of meeting WP:NFILMS. no awards won or critical acclaim. LibStar (talk) 03:14, 3 February 2012...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. No sources in the article. WP:BEFORE showed promos, directory listings...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Consensus that NFILM is not met Nosebagbear (talk) 13:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box]...

February 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails NFILM/GNG/NWEB. Lourdes 10:37, 11 February 2017 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. I was unable to find significant...

not ROUTINE. You have misunderstood NFILM. The sources I pointed out above satisfy WP:NFSOURCES, which is NFILM's main criteria. You are referring to...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NFILM, zero reviews found in a BEFORE. PROD removed by creator, with the justification...

WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. I initially WP:PRODed it with the following rationale: "A film that does not appear to pass the WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. It is currently...

Nomination withdrawn — per the added reviews by Ffranc. The article now passes NFILM. Thanks! (non-admin closure) 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 21:46, 28 June 2022 (UTC)...

2021 (UTC) Delete no coverage, fails NFILM. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 15:04, 4 July 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 18:55, 4 July 2021 (UTC)...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of notability found to meet WP:NFILM. Htanaungg (talk) 15:47, 2 November 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Couldn't find any notability as stated in WP:NFILM. Htanaungg (talk) 04:18, 30 August 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I can't see that this movie meets WP:NFILM. There are several notable films by this title, but my search for sources...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Upcoming documentary failing WP:NFILMS as well as WP:GNG as on now. PROD was contested without providing reason...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG; unable to find any reviews, significant analysis or awards....

2012 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM. Hipocrite (talk) 19:19, 7 May 2012 (UTC) Delete: no indication that the topic meets WP:NFILM (however as its title is...

websites so I have linked to the nearest thing instead). No evidence of WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:40, 24 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM... Written as an essay, surely not like a WP article, so aside from it failing NFILM WP:TNT might be needed. Kolma8...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. The citations are basically listings (incl on producer's site) or passing...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, and lacks reliable sources. I searched, but couldn't find many. Only a...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promo entry on an unremarkable movie; does not meet WP:NFILM. The awards listed -- "8th Best Film" -- is not significant. No encyclopedically...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is a ten word film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Kolma8 (talk) 19:18, 22 December 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

from reliable sources, fails GNG and NFILM. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 16:07, 8 July 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 12:30, 12 July 2021...

(UTC) Retain Comment: The film complies notability guidelines given in WP:NFILM. The pageviews for this article since its creation is: 98,813. In my opinion...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The film fails WP:NFILM. I have found no reliable sources that would cover the film in depth. Less...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. This is essentially a WP:1S...

ResonantDistortion 23:10, 7 September 2024 (UTC) Keep RD's two sources clinch NFILMS, and there's no earthly reason we would delete an article about an early...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NFILM and significant RS coverage not found. Awards are not significant. For AfDs...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. PROD was removed by an IP user...

contrast User:Lugnuts, I see no available sources that indicate notability per NFILMS, GNG, and WP:NFO. According to one source, Zafranovic made this film as...

Fails GNG/NFILM. Nothing notable found. Kolma8 (talk) 04:58, 21 July 2021 (UTC) Delete - barely even meets WP:V let alone WP:GNG or WP:NFILM, failed to...

page.‎ The result was speedy keep. Nom withdrawn, no other deletes, meets NFILM; close per WP:SKCRIT (non-admin closure) Britishfinance (talk) 10:58, 2...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: All two references are the database entries. Kolma8...

without explanation. Concern was: No notability claims. Appears to fail WP:NFILMS. BOVINEBOY2008 21:49, 11 August 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

the plot, which the article lacks, let alone any RS coverage. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. (A previous version of this article was speedied in 2015, with...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Could not find sources for passing WP:NFILM. Trying an individual nomination instead to see whether it gives a better...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Crappy bot article that doesn't meet WP:NFILM nor GNG.  » Shadowowl | talk 16:54, 21 July 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as only 1 reliable review was found in a WP:BEFORE (Sify) that could help...

WP:NFILM. Donaldd23 (talk) 12:12, 5 April 2021 (UTC) Delete per nom. Fails WP:NFILM. Kolma8 (talk) 21:23, 8 April 2021 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFILM. Riteboke...

discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:04, 27 June 2021 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NFILM. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 16:20, 27 June 2021 (UTC) Delete. There are many...

14:26, 2 July 2021 (UTC) Delete - fails GNG, and I argue it also fails NFILM. NFILM says: "The film is widely distributed and has received full-length reviews...

significant coverage in reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying WP:NFILM. Current sources are either announcements or passing mentions and I can't...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NFILM, could find nothing other than database listings and non-independent sources...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Someone created the repository of ENTIRE Malayalam-language...

a copy of the one-line plot-summary in IMDb, and that was all. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 20:57, 9 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, and lacks reliable sources. I searched, but couldn't find. Kailash29792...

this page.‎ The result was delete. Consensus is that the film fails WP:NFILM. Just Chilling (talk) 10:37, 19 July 2019 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. PROD was removed by an IP user...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film fails WP:NFILM. Appears to be a WP:PROMOTION violation by a WP:SPA. GretLomborg (talk)...

supported claim of notability per WP:NFILM. • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 22 April 2017 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:NFILM.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:34, 25 April 2017...

is a non-notable documentary that relies on primary sources. It fails WP:NFILMS, as it lacks critical reviews, awards, or wide release. NinjaRobotPirate...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Short film doesn't meet WP:NFILM, would redirect to director, but they don't have a page either. Onel5969...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: #1 and #2 are dead. #3 - is a short mixed review;...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. That two of the actors appeared in Karate Kid does nothing to establish...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: One negative REDIFF review. Kolma8 (talk) 18:37...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. There is also a 1958 film with the same name which makes searching for...

corroborate the one in the article; nothing resembling WP:RS. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 15:02, 5 June 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

based on the notability of the film Beyond Treason, which also fails WP:NFILMS and is currently at AFD. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 03:01, 4 August 2014 (UTC)...

sources. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:28, 25 January 2014 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:NFILMS, no Wikified links to actors, actresses and key people and companies in...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Disputed PROD. Fails WP:NFILM. All references and actors cited are for the 2013 film. There are no supporting...

is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. The REDIFF review would not pass per WP:NFILM as it fails "full-length reviews by two or...

to this page.‎ The result was delete. Seems no real argument this passes NFILMS and that is the standard we apply. if you think my reading of this in the...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. I tried to PROD it, but an IP-only...

which I subsequently attempted to source without success. The work fails WP:NFILMS as I was unable to find substantive third-party coverage of the film itself...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) currently fails WP:NFILM with no meaningful coverage and several months til release. PRAXIDICAE🌈...

mere existence of two reviews automatically guarantees notability via WP:NFILM indicates a very superficial and inaccurate reading of that guideline. After...

(talk) 02:59, 25 September 2020 (UTC) Delete - concerns around WP:GNG and WP:NFILM; the film exists but there is a complete lack of coverage/reviews Spiderone...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, and lacks reliable sources. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:38, 31 December 2020...

but nothing even as thorough as the IMDb 4-line plot summary. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 19:18, 10 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails NFILM. Low-budge movie without evidence of any impact. Most of article is promotional...

failed to find even so much as the plot, which the article lacks. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 06:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This...

WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 12:19, 24 January 2021 (UTC) Delete per above. 777burger talk contribs 21:43, 24 January 2021 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFILM. No...

WP:NFILM is a different nation/people group than the English speaking world. Altogether, it's enough to pass WP:SIGCOV and criteria 1 and 5 of WP:NFILM.4meter4...

tagged for 2 years, let alone anything that would show notability. Fails WP:NFILM. Web search found directory level info, IMDb (which appears to be source...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No claim to notability. Fails WP: NFILMS. Admiral Caius (talk) 18:04, 14 January 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

Wikipedia:WikiProject Animation it fits under Films in the hierarchy, so WP:NFILMS? - see also [the Project Animation Style Guide] Flat Out (talk) 02:11, 6...

directory-like listing for an unremarkable film series. Does not meet WP:NFILM and significant RS coverage not found. Awards are not significant. For AfDs...

see WP:NFILM met. Celestina007 (talk) 00:14, 11 July 2021 (UTC) Delete, fails NFILM and even GNG. The current citations do not satisfy NFILM as IMDb...

04:25, 11 July 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 12:26, 12 July 2021 (UTC) Delete FAILS WP:NFILM Nitesh003 (talk) 14:46, 12 July 2021 (UTC)...

JSTOR · TWL) Film with nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM. Donaldd23 (talk) 18:56, 16 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE . Was dePROD'ed without an explanation...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. The only source I could find that would qualify as reliable in the context...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, lacks sources, lacks categories. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 06:05, 24 September...

concerns around WP:NFILM and WP:GNG; needs more reviews to pass really Spiderone 14:19, 12 September 2020 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NFILM.VocalIndia (talk)...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. The only sources that i could find are database or list-type books. PROD...

Non notable movie with a non notable cast and crew. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Has no references, and searching provides for no coverage in reliable sources...

must satisfy RS - and this one doesn't, as any translation shows. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 18:07, 5 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This...

newspapers; therefore meets WP:NFILM. -- Ab207 (talk) 05:27, 15 March 2021 (UTC) Keep as clearly passes criteria one of WP:NFILM as reviewd in at least two...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Ref: 1 is primary 2 is dead 3 is dead 4 is a REDIFF review fails...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Absolutely nothing to suggest this meets WP:NFILM or even WP:GNG. I can find no coverage outside of what is provided in the...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film failing WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Notability tagged since 2017. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to...

(UTC) Delete Does not meet NFILM, not much at IMDB page. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 18:04, 10 June 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 21:02...

reliable sources.[1][2] The film exists, but doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. Worldbruce (talk) 04:52, 18 December 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

an apparently unreleased film, with no indication of notability per WP:NFILM. No significant coverage online in WP:Reliable sources, just lots of marketing...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, like most Woody Woodpecker shorts. A basic BEFORE search found no significant...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable short film, fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. It's described as a runner up in a competition for amateur local...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE Kolma8 (talk) 11:08, 16 January...

20:18, 11 April 2014 (UTC) Delete - Mostly unsourced material, failing WP:NFILMS. ///EuroCarGT 02:39, 12 April 2014 (UTC) Redirect to Adrian_Fulle#Film....

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: All three references are the database entries +...

WP:BEFORE except film database sites and videos. No reviews found. Fails WP:NFILM. This was removed without explanation nor any improvement to the article...

the end, and doesn't even attempt a notability claim that would pass WP:NFILM. As always, every film is not automatically guaranteed a Wikipedia article...

not satisfy wp:nfilm or wp:sigcov --☆★Mamushir (✉✉) 17:03, 19 September 2020 (UTC) Delete due to concerns around WP:GNG and WP:NFILM Spiderone 19:16...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: All three references are the database entries. Kolma8...

- A search only comes up with IMDB and Facebook - which according to WP:NFILM are not reliable sources - and thus does not satisfy the notability guidelines...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NFILM; significant RS coverage not found. Sourcing is unselective databases or...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to satisfy WP:NFILMS. PROD declined without explanation by an IP. Safiel (talk) 02:08, 12 September...

film festival [1], but this does not meet the "major award" criteria of WP:NFILM and it does not appear to meet any of the other criteria either. Laplorfill...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. PROD was removed by an IP user...

notability, no significant coverage from independent sources - fails WP:NFILMS. MikeWazowski (talk) 17:42, 29 July 2011 (UTC) Delete Maybe it has a release...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. No critic reviews or other significant coverage. Lennart97 (talk) 21:54...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. Pardon my failure of BEFORE, but I don't see anything in the article that...

not apply to film. No indication of significance, does not pass GNG nor NFILM. Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 16:15, 28 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Three sources listed #1 and #3 are to the same page, which is a movie database...

They aren't reviews, nor could I find any. I feel that this film fails WP:NFILM. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:05, 1 October 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

up nothing at all except the usual listings sites and scraoes. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 16:24, 2 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

Non-notable film Nördic Nightfury 08:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. DrStrauss talk 09:30, 21 February 2017 (UTC) Comment – @Nordic...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. Has no sources. » Shadowowl | talk 16:16, 25 July 2018 (UTC) Note: This...

wasn't able to find where there's coverage enough to justify it meeting NFILM. To be honest, most short films have a big struggle meeting notability guidelines...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 9 December 2012 (UTC) Delete This fails WP:NFILMS so badly it scares me. There's nothing out there on this one, notability-wise...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. This is essentially a WP:1S...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILMS. The film was never released commercially, is not historically notable,...

Current refs include IMDB and cast listings elsewhere. Does not meet WP:NFILMS I, Jethrobot drop me a line 21:35, 29 June 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: None. Kolma8 (talk) 19:06, 20 December 2020 (UTC)...

discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFILM. If there is any info that can be merged somewhere that is fine but I couldn't...

(talk) 03:07, 16 December 2021 (UTC) Delete No coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. A contender for WP:FREAKY though. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:43, 16 December...

mention, and the usual collection of listings sites and WP scrapes. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 19:01, 31 July 2020 (UTC) Delete Non notable...

as an article once it has been released and the sources required by WP:NFILM exist and can be added. Eluchil404 (talk) 09:08, 3 June 2017 (UTC) Channa...

feed. This short film does not appear to meet our standards found at WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:18, 21 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, and lacks reliable sources. I searched, but couldn't find. Kailash29792...

sources including a sufficient number of reviews and others to pass WP:NFILMS. No need to waste more time here. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:31, 19 January 2016...

JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Going on Netflix isn't enough for notability. Keep. Passes WP:SIGCOV and WP:NFILM with multiple independent...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE . Was dePROD'ed without an explanation...

no WP:SIGCOV at all so does not meet WP:GNG. I can't see a passing of WP:NFILM either. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:50, 3 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A non notable film, Fails WP:NFILM. Citterz (talk) 18:34, 23 March 2021 (UTC) Struck the nomination rationale...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILMS. The only evidence that this film even existed is an IMDB listing, a few...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. The three links provided do not cover the film well. Also, I am not sure...

August 2020 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 12:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC) Delete - concerns around WP:NFILM and WP:GNG Spiderone 14:02, 30 August...

over a period of years. The article doesn't make any claim to passing WP:NFILM. It's screened at several film festivals, but that in and of itself isn't...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Short film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing of note was found in a BEFORE. DonaldD23 talk to me 18:25, 7...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM & WP:GNG. Didn't won any award, have no review from any independent source...

directory-like listing for an unremarkable film series. Does not meet WP:NFILM and significant RS coverage not found. Awards are not significant. For an...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This film doesn't qualify WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. I had moved it to drafts so that it could be improved but the...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film by a non notable director. It fails WP:NFILM that requires a film to be "widely distributed and has received full-length...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No sources, fails WP:NFILM. All plot as well, no encyclopedic value. Kirbanzo (talk) 23:50, 7 September...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:21, 7 July 2021 (UTC) Delete unfortunately this fails NFILM as it has no reliable coverage aside from a review by DVD Talk. No reviews...

this page.‎ The result was keep. Consensus is that the subject passes WP:NFILM as it has multiple independent critical reviews. (non-admin closure) Curbon7...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Only one cited source focuses on this subject. Most everything...

qualifies, which eliminates the concern about buying and selling. See WP:NFILMS for details. Simply asserting that the film is notable doesn't fly here...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. The only reference in the article...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Zero significant coverage. Fails WP:NFILM. IMDb is unreliable as a source per this discussion. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:29...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILMS. The article's only reference is in a Telegu cinema database. I am finding...

6 July 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 13:04, 6 July 2021 (UTC) Delete per above, fails NFILM. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 16:20, 7 July...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews found in a BEFORE DonaldD23 talk to me 12:15, 6 September...

TWL) Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM. Only things found were film database sites and promotional material. PROD...

WP:GNG. FiddleheadLady (talk) 14:10, 21 July 2021 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NFILM DonaldD23 talk to me 14:58, 21 July 2021 (UTC) Keep. Fred Olen Ray is a...

discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:07, 10 July 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 12:27, 12 July 2021 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...

Delete fails WP:NFILM. Only sources I found were wikis and databases. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 22:47, 27 June 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk)...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM by a mile.Non-notable documentary.Part of a promotional walled garden around...

with Ab207, G4 may have been prudent in this case and it does not meet WP:NFILM. A S U K I T E  23:28, 11 June 2021 (UTC) Draftify I think it can be improved...

that a 1996 film is "really old"), but nothing of any substance. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 05:50, 5 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This...

While the series is clearly notable, this particular short does not pass WP:NFILM. Onel5969 TT me 13:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

neccessary specs to statisfy WP:NFILM. Sunshine1191 (talk) 11:30, 29 September 2020 (UTC) Delete - does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NFILM, which are the agreed guidelines...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Can't find evidence that this meets WP:NFILM. No reviews or later critical commentary located on a search of Google,...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, does not have categories, claims to be in development but does not mention...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROD was The only criterion of WP:NFILM that this stands a chance of passing is number 3. I don't, however, believe...

original author without addressing the underlying concern. Appears to fail WP:NFILMS. I am unable to locate any significant reliable source coverage to establish...

discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 06:37, 8 July 2021 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NFILM, lacks significant coverage in reliable independent sources. The Films.lk...

beautiful when someone hands us the perfect WP:CRYSTAL to go along with WP:NFILMS. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 08:30, 3 January 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

that this passes WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:07, 10 August 2020 (UTC) Delete: Fails the GNG and NFILM. No evidence of significant...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: One archived reference to the film database entry...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: #1 is to iTune; #2 will not pass for a reliable...

underground notoriety on the review circuit, it pretty thoroughly fails WP:NFILM. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:35, 17 December 2020 (UTC)...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails NFILM. No SIGCOV. No reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. Passing mentions here and there...

discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:08, 29 March 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFILM and WP:SELFPROMOTION. I hope the "bounding" students used a steady-cam....

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails NFILM and the GNG not to mention WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Little more than an commentary-free...

search for the Hindi title, सती नर्मदा, fared no better. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Narky Blert (talk) 16:57, 21 April 2021 (UTC) Comment by nom. As a curiosity...

25 May 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 13:08, 25 May 2021 (UTC) Delete: per nom. Fails GNG and NFILM. Nothing here to support notability...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. PROD was removed by an IP user...

TWL) Non notable fan film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability since May 2017. Previous AfD was no consensus. Donaldd23...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, and lacks reliable sources. I searched, but couldn't find. Kailash29792...

and the principal photography has also ended, meets the criteria of WP:NFILMS. 14:49, 27 March 2013 (UTC) Keep per adequately meeting WP:NF. While certainly...

list of reviews on ImDB took a while, but no joy there. Thus failure of WP:NFILM. No single obvious redirect target, so delete for now. Nosebagbear (talk)...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NFILM. Unreleased movie still in production. Insignificant coverage of the film...

(talk) 03:03, 25 September 2020 (UTC) Delete - concerns around WP:GNG and WP:NFILM; the database listings prove that the film exists but there is nothing to...

and WP:NFILM are passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:37, 22 September 2020 (UTC) Keep - Also meets WP:NFILM WP:GNG --...

(talk) 21:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC) Comment possibly the film passes WP:NFILM, the language seriously needs improvement to make it encyclopedic. --☆★Mamushir...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, and lacks reliable sources. I searched, but couldn't find. Kailash29792...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Sources are mostly just listings in databases. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 00:25...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM; unreleased, referenced with a few promo links, no significant coverage...

Delete - fails NFILM and GNG. Cannot find any reviews or other coverage. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 13:07, 7 July 2021 (UTC) Delete, fails NFILM and GNG. Research...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. Sources for the 1973 film not found, unlike Alam Ara, the 1931 film. Merry...

significant coverage; no reviews available on digital archives. Fails WP:NFILM. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:17, 18 October 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

2017 film. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:40, 12 April 2017 (UTC) Delete Per WP:NFILM and reasoning mentioned above. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 00:12, 13...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. No awards, no national distribution, few reliable sources with reviews...

anything to show this film meets WP:GNG, and certainly doesn't meet WP:NFILM. Notable cast members do not generally grant notability. What is missing...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NFILM. I can't see any improvements then the earlier version Dur (2016 film) which...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: None, Unsourced. Kolma8 (talk) 18:32, 20 December...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NFILM criteria. ––FormalDude talk 02:22, 29 August 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

or reviews; nothing that comes remotely close to the requirements of WP:NFILM. Dorsetonian (talk) 20:08, 24 March 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

Lenticel. CesareAngelotti (talk) 18:49, 28 August 2014 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NFILMS. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 05:19, 31 August 2014 (UTC) The above discussion...

marketing. Only independent sources here are capsule reviews. Fails WP:NFILM and is probably eligible for WP:G11 given the WP:PUFFERY. – FenixFeather...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) disputed draftification. Fails WP:NFILM 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 15:15, 27 June 2022 (UTC) Note:...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. The refs are: routine announcement from a questionably WP:RS source with...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM, as tagged since March 2012. The article was deprodded by Patar knight,...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. The citations are basically listings or passing mentions. WP:BEFORE did...

internet for WP:BEFORE, there is really nothing to support that it meets WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. The original play that the film is based of probably does have...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NFILM Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:48, 23 July 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

significant coverage in reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying WP:NFILM" which is still true. The four sources are two press releases, one listing...

(talk) 03:00, 25 September 2020 (UTC) Delete - concerns around WP:GNG and WP:NFILM; we will need more than database listings and cinema showtimes to establish...

TWL) A short film, never released in theaters, no indication it meets WP:NFILM, and nothing in searches to show it passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 18:26...

maybe-this-might-still be notable criteria trump the failure to satisfy NFILMS, the failure to meet the GNG, and the complete absence of reliable sources...

discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:19, 6 July 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 12:31, 12 July 2021 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...

actors on the cast (particularly Olivia Newton-John), but looking through WP:NFILM that doesn't appear to actually be a criterion for film notability. signed...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: All three references are the database entries. Kolma8...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, WP:NFILMS and violates WP:CRYSTAL. The reference provided does not discuss the subject...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. No significant coverage, review or anything. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 19:41...

coverage in RS. NickCT (talk) 13:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NFILM DonaldD23 talk to me 14:57, 21 July 2021 (UTC) Keep. Major mainstream film...

Thanks, ✗plicit 01:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC) Delete - Fails the WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. The article lists three "critical reviews", but in one of them I can't...

have won. Even if there were, not significant awards. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Onel5969 TT me 12:15, 11 July 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

2020 (UTC) Delete fail WP:NFILM . NO evidence of notability Samat lib (talk) 22:43, 24 October 2020 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFILM and nom. Roller26 (talk)...

film does not currently meet the notability requirements as outlined in WP:NFILM and, by extension, WP:GNG. TheSandDoctor Talk 07:45, 8 November 2020 (UTC)...

July 2018 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:46, 31 July 2018 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM non notable actors. Non notable film...

be notable, as I cannot find anything in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM. Donaldd23 (talk) 16:18, 20 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A film that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. The general notability guideline states: "If a topic has received...

discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:41, 22 May 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Zero sourcing and there is a hint of WP:COI. This probably could have been...

TWL) Unaired, cancelled television project. Epically fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILMS. Recreated after previous deletion at AfD. Delete and Salt. Safiel (talk)...

(talk) 02:56, 25 September 2020 (UTC) Delete - concerns around WP:GNG and WP:NFILM; the article claims that the film was released to mixed reviews but I'm...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not pass WP:NFILM. ––FormalDude talk 02:26, 29 August 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE Kolma8 (talk) 22:43, 6 February...

for speedy deletion as copyvio, fixed and tag removed but still fails WP:NFILM. DrStrauss talk 21:36, 21 August 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Crappy bot article that doesn't meet WP:NFILM nor GNG. » Shadowowl | talk 16:56, 21 July 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Crappy bot article that doesn't meet WP:NFILM nor GNG. » Shadowowl | talk 12:31, 21 July 2018 (UTC) Comment. This article...

TWL) Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability since June 2017. PROD removed because "deprodding...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: One reference that mentioned the movie in passing...

significant coverage in reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying WP:NFILM. GSS (talk|c|em) 14:47, 20 March 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

Maryland. InvadingInvader (talk) 18:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM DonaldD23 talk to me 20:20, 25 October 2022 (UTC) Delete - It got a couple...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. PROD was removed because there...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NFILM, no reviews found in a BEFORE. All currents sources are database sites....

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NFILMS this is not yet notable as it has not received extensive coverage from third-party...

coverage from WP:RS, no significant review or anything. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NFILM. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 20:50, 25 August 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

recently recreated. A direct to DVD film, which fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Onel5969 TT me 17:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: One, which is dead. Article was tagged for verification...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NFILM as I couldn't find any reviews in a BEFORE. PROD removed with "AFD it if...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails in WP:NFILM. Didn't find any reviews. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 (Ping me or else I won't...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film, fails WP:NFILM. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass. PROD removed because "It's...

WP:NFILM and importantly WP:GNG. No reliable sources have covered this movie. Jupitus Smart 18:04, 12 March 2017 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NFILM. SW3...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable short film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as just appearing at festivals is not enough for notability requirements...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This seems to fail WP:NFILM as there is very little coverage other than the film festival listing and...

as required by WP:NFILM for undistributed films. Quasihuman | Talk 09:47, 22 June 2011 (UTC) Delete this non-notable film (WP:NFILM). It has no reliable...

Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE search to help it pass WP:NFILM. Wikipedia is not IMdB. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:21, 19 December 2020 (UTC) Note:...

deletion discussions. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:10, 1 July 2021 (UTC) Delete fails NFILM. I could not find any coverage for this from some searching. Anonymous 7481...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 06:22, 13 October 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: One reference, mentioning the film in passing. Kolma8...

(talk) 05:01, 10 July 2021 (UTC) Withdrawing as I clearly misinterpreted WP:NFILM in this instance. Curbon7 (talk) 20:43, 11 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

is working on the article. If and when this project no longer fails WP:NFILM then undeletion is an obvious possibility. BencherliteTalk 15:10, 9 February...

there are 3 critic reviews at Rotten Tomatoes [1]. Only 2 needed to pass WP:NFILM DonaldD23 talk to me 18:22, 2 June 2022 (UTC) SPS and SPS, don't contribute...

(1968) but no critical analysis. Critical analysis is required to meet WP:NFILM, not just history of existing. Unless offline sources can be demonstrated...

no other reasons to assume that it might be notable in any way. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Regards SoWhy 16:15, 19 July 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Created by a UPE. Fails WP:NFILM – multiple reviews are required – here, awards in non-notable ROTM festivals...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. Was tagged for being unsourced...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NFILM. Prod contested on talk page. hinnk (talk) 02:06, 6 September 2022 (UTC)...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable: nothing to suggest that it meets WP:NFILMS or WP:GNG. The only references are Youtube links and its Amazon page - the...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film which does not meet WP:NFILM requirements. No citations apart from an IMDb link. Could not find any reliable...

it having reviews. This film fails to meet the required criteria in WP:NFILM. The reviews are by unknown critics as in there is no identified author...

WP:GNG. On WP:NFILM IMO only the critic at The New York Times is nationally well known, I don't think the rest qualifies, so WP:NFILM criteria 1 is failed...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews or significant coverage was found in a WP:BEFORE. PROD removed...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This film fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Couldn't find any info of its notability. No real references...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews found in a BEFORE. All current citations are databases or...

Spider) 07:58, 31 July 2021 (UTC) Keep, passes WP:NFILM DonaldD23 talk to me 11:20, 31 July 2021 (UTC) NFILM requires significant coverage by independent sources...

NFILM and GNG. I could find no coverage for this after some extensive research. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 02:15, 30 June 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:TOOSOON, WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:42, 17 November 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

JSTOR · TWL) Nothing is written about the movie, fails WP:BASIC and WP:NFILM Flat Out (talk) 23:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC) Strong Delete - A quick look...

matches a film production company), unsourced for five years now, WP:GNG/WP:NFILM failure. The only source I managed to find with any pretense of reliability...

due to concerns around WP:NFILM and WP:GNG Spiderone 18:01, 7 August 2020 (UTC) Delete since subject blatantly fails WP:NFILM. Wikipedia is not a directory...

Tokyogirl79 (talk) 03:44, 15 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79 Delete fails WP:NFILMS. 11coolguy12 (talk) 07:37, 15 October 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

September 2021 (UTC) Keep passes WP:NFILM per above.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:21, 8 September 2021 (UTC) Keep WP:NFILM is clearly met here Yaxı Hökmdarz...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film with no major cast members. Fails WP:NFILM with no reviews from notable publications as well as WP:N due to the paucity...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. PROD was removed by Kashmorwiki:...

JSTOR · TWL) Article about a film, not properly referenced as passing WP:NFILM. As always, films aren't all automatically notable enough for Wikipedia...

plot summary. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Narky Blert (talk) 17:22, 28 May 2020 (UTC) Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. IMDB Source not relevant. CommanderWaterford...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. The film has not been released yet. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:40, 7 December...

film for which I declined a speedy and PRODed afterward. Does not meet WP:NFILM. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 03:12, 30 November 2014 (UTC) Delete. I just can't...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film. Fails WP:NFILM . A WP:BEFORE could not find any references to the film in question not...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: All three references are the database entries. Kolma8...

(UTC) Delete - yet another one that fails WP:NFILM Spiderone 10:42, 3 September 2020 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 00:34, 10 September 2020...

well-developed articles, but notability is not WP:INHERITED. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Narky Blert (talk) 18:58, 12 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as only one review (rediff) was found DonaldD23 talk to me 16:30, 22 January...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This film fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Couldn't find any info of its notability. Both references are...

this page.‎ The result was delete. Clear consensus that this film fails WP:NFILM. Just Chilling (talk) 18:14, 20 July 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. No independent notability given, and the award appears to be one for participation...

Arthur (TV series). Fails NFILM. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 01:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC) Redirect to Arthur (TV series). Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 14:31,...

deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:50, 4 July 2021 (UTC) Delete fails NFILM. There is nothing to suggest that this made-for-TV documentary is particularly...

16:24, 27 June 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 18:41, 27 June 2021 (UTC) Delete fails NFILM. Screening at film festivals do not establish...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and GNG no reviews found on either of the sources provided only user generated...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM. Its 2020 but the film's principle photography is not started yet. In 2017...

documentary, tagged since April 2015. Nothing found to help it pass WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 15:29, 27 October 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. References: All three references are the database entries. Kolma8...

Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE search to help it pass WP:NFILM. Only things found were film database sites and videos. Tagged for notability...

the subject. Most of sources doesn't qualify as WP:RS. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NFILM. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 20:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

party sources. Only myspace and some unreliable sources found. Fails WP:NFILMS. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 09:40, 7 September 2014 (UTC) Delete not...

Unsourced article about future film. No evidence of notability. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:TOOSOON. - MrX 12:56, 22 November 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

discussions. Fram (talk) 07:52, 28 February 2021 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 15:59, 28 February 2021 (UTC) Delete as there is a lack...

discussions. Roller26 (talk) 17:03, 30 June 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 21:31, 30 June 2021 (UTC) Delete - Can only find the film...

film series, not reliably sourced as having a solid claim to passing WP:NFILM. The notability claim being made here is that two of the films won short...

this movie, and even then it is in the form of passing mentions. Fails NFILM and GNG. JavaHurricane 12:14, 25 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFILM and the GNG. Only claim of notability is that the studio that made this...

policy based reasons for deletion and consensus that the film passes WP:NFILM (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (t • c) 11:38, 2 May 2019 (UTC) [Hide this...

2020 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 12:15, 1 November 2020 (UTC) Delete - Clear and thorough failure of WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Hog Farm Bacon...

their film series, In the Tracks of. Both fail WP:GNG and the film fails WP:NFILM. Accordingly, I am also nominating the following related pages: In the Tracks...