DOKUMEN123.COM

an academic is notable under this guideline. Shortcut WP:NACADEMICWP:NACADEMIC Academics meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated...

January 2015 (UTC) Keep NACADEMICS 7. I don't quite accept the GNG rationale that Gobonobo describes above, but the NACADEMICS 7 argument seems solid,...

equivalent to the president in the USA). Of course he's notable. Meets WP:NACADEMICS #6. No valid reason given for deletion. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:03, 22...

meets WP:NACADEMICS #6. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:32, 7 October 2014 (UTC) Delete - per nom -- Wikipedia is not a CV. He does not pass WP:NACADEMICS for his...

what is expected under WP:NACADEMICS. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:19, 19 August 2015 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMICS. Publishing a lot of papers...

passing one or more specific notability criteria in WP:NARTIST and/or WP:NACADEMICS, but nothing like that is being shown here at all. Bearcat (talk) 14:47...

satisfies both WP:NACADEMICS and WP:GNG. freshacconci talk to me 18:19, 13 April 2015 (UTC) Withdraw, per section 8 of WP:NACADEMIC. Grognard Extraordinaire...

2014 (UTC) Does this article not meet the notability guidelines under WP:NACADEMICS? Interlaker (talk) 23:50, 7 October 2014 (UTC) What criteria listed there...

WP:TNT Mdann52 (talk) 20:44, 13 March 2015 (UTC) Keep. Notable per WP:NACADEMICS #6. There are tons of news articles about this woman. --Samuel J. Howard...

cover this person and it's very unlikely that the subject meets any WP:NACADEMICS criteria, given the lack of coverage by independent reliable sources and...

at the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2011, so, if verified, passes WP:NACADEMICS which says he's notable if he's "been an elected member of a highly selective...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fails WP:NACADEMICS, and sourcing mostly appears to be routine and not help pass WP:GNG. Mdann52...

in the various references provided. It does not appear to satisfy WP:NACADEMICS or WP:BIO based on the information provided. I don't believe that being...

by ShulMaven (talk • contribs) Keep. The appropriate guidelines are WP:NACADEMICS. In this case you can search in Google Scholar to find a considerable...

02:11, 3 July 2015 (UTC) Speedy Keep Not only does he easily fit under WP:NACADEMICS #3, he's also won an significant NAS award and under #5 is a named chair...

is perhaps debatable whether she satisfies the criteria listed in WP:NACADEMICS. However, she clearly meets WP:GNG: "If a topic has received significant...

discussion that the subject meets point #3 of WP:NACADEMICS, and of the specific criteria notes for WP:NACADEMICS meets point #3 and point #1. (non-admin closure)...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 1 February 2014 (UTC) Keep per WP:NACADEMICS for being the holder of a named chair "W. A. “Tex” Moncrief, Jr. Centennial...

The result was keep. Consensus is quite clear that subject passes WP:NACADEMIC. (non-admin closure) Ifnord (talk) 12:07, 24 December 2018 (UTC) [Hide...

difference between Head editor and Executive editor. According to WP:NACADEMICS, we are suppose to keep anyone who has served as a head editor.--TonyTheTiger...

Gusfriend (talk) 02:22, 14 October 2022 (UTC) Delete fails Wikipedia:NACADEMICS. Has one book that's cited but there is not a long publication history...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Seems like an interesting professor, but fails WP:NACADEMICS. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:03, 8 November 2015 (UTC) Keep Has been elected...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NBIO and WP:NACADEMICS: The government award he received was only awarded twice (2010 and 2015)...

JSTOR · TWL) The subject is an associate professor- clearly fails WP:NACADEMICS - it was previously the subject of a speedy delete in 2011. The article...

2025 (UTC) Delete - Still appears to fail notability criteria for WP:NACADEMICS, WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR even after recent additions. The Rome Prize is only...

any reason given. My concern is that I don't believe that she meets WP:NACADEMICS. She doesn't seem to have made a impact as required by #1, she has always...

meet any of the points of WP:NACADEMICS. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 14:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC) Keep – Meets WP:NACADEMICS #C8, "head or chief editor...

subject does not appear to have met any of the criteria set forth in WP:NACADEMICS; while the subject did write the numerous papers as I had linked, the...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of Notability. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NACADEMIC GermanKity (talk) 07:27, 18 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

(talk) 19:46, 19 November 2015 (UTC) Weak keep. An h-index of 37 meets WP:NACADEMICS#1 in most fields, and I do not think that marine biology is one of the...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMICS and WP:GNG with only one source in the news; article is just a list of...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not fulfill a single criterion of WP:NACADEMICS. No coverage in independent sources. kashmiri TALK 13:44, 10 December...

satisfies WP:NACADEMICS criterion #3.. The core question here seems to be whether INSA is a scholarly society of the level required by WP:NACADEMICS #3. I don't...

presented for. Getting citations is not sufficient to pass WP:GNG or WP:NACADEMICS (indeed Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)#Citation_metrics warns specifically...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMICS Ueutyi (talk) 21:50, 11 January 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

some of them are highly cited. Boleyn, why don't you think she meets WP:NACADEMICS? Tchaliburton (talk) 11:22, 17 August 2014 (UTC) Weak delete She does...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I don't see him meeting any criterion of WP:NACADEMICS. Being a "Harry white fellow" does not meet criterion 3. LibStar (talk)...

(UTC) Keep, as she passes NACADEMIC.Jackattack1597 (talk) 14:44, 15 October 2021 (UTC) Keep, per above, passes WP:NACADEMIC.Brayan ocaner (talk) 21:23...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:GNG. ∯WBGconverse 15:36, 18 May 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

JSTOR · TWL) Person fails to meet Wikipedia:Notability per WP:AUTHOR or WP:NACADEMICS. Additionally page has no citations at all. I attempted to address this...

(talk) 03:30, 17 September 2015 (UTC) Except perhaps for readers of WP:NACADEMICS which says "Major institutions, for these purposes, are those that have...

advice. In my opinion, this article fails the criteria set out in WP:NACADEMICS. The article mentions a number of companies and concepts associated with...

person, seems like a poorly-written promotional piece. Probably fails WP:NACADEMICS since I don't see how she has made a significant contribution to her field...

passes WP:NACADEMIC. Sources exist and simply need to be added. Rollidan (talk) 03:39, 6 August 2019 (UTC) Keep - per above. Passes WP:NACADEMIC #6: The...

entirely reliant on primary sources, and that I'm not 100% sure he meets WP:NACADEMICS as a notability guideline, I figured I'd bring it here for a second opinion...

sources from a quick Google to meet WP:BIO. However, I do think he meets WP:NACADEMICS, probably both #1 and #7, for his work on thiamine. I'm not sure the article...

'Keep per WP:NACADEMIC: vice-chancellor of a university is the highest-level post. PamD 11:40, 24 July 2022 (UTC) Keep per WP:NACADEMIC per above.Pharaoh...

there's anything approaching a minimum number of citations sought for an NACADEMICS#1/#4 pass, and perhaps the 703 listed on Google Scholar is far and away...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 26 May 2014 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:NACADEMICS. Appears to have made a fair contribution to his field but I can find...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:NACADEMIC Derek Andrews (talk) 23:55, 24 July 2017 (UTC) Keep. WP:NACADEMIC criterion 5 states: "The person holds...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject fails WP:NACADEMICS. No non-trivial mention found in sources independent of the subject. Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ...

Eppstein (talk) 22:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC) Delete. Could possibly meet WP:NACADEMICS but I can't find evidence for this in a brief search. Kendall-K1 (talk)...

researcher, satisfying WP:NACADEMICS #1. In addition, she holds a named professorship at Brown University, satisfying WP:NACADEMICS #5. —gdfusion (talk|contrib)...

October 2022 (UTC) Although Abbott isn't who would typically be measured by NACADEMIC, his American Academy of Arts and Sciences membership would qualify him...

19:27, 6 June 2014 (UTC) Speedy Keep No valid delete reason. Meets WP:NACADEMICS. "The Indian Council of Medical Research the apex body in India for the...

not enough to constitute significant coverage or to meet any of the WP:NACADEMICS criteria. The rest of the sources are his own scholarly papers, which...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Consensus is that WP:NACADEMIC and WP:PROF are not met at this time. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 20:51...

Journal which makes him pass per WP:THREE. Also this segment from WP:NACADEMICS is relevant here: "However, academics may also work outside academia and...

seem that she meets WP:NACADEMIC on their strengths. So, unless discovering a single insect species is enough to meet NACADEMIC, I don't think that we...

NorthAmerica1000 01:25, 8 November 2014 (UTC) Speedy Keep Notable per WP:NACADEMICS and WP:ANYBIO. --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 04:16, 8 November 2014 (UTC) Definite...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable under WP:NACADEMICS. While there are quite a few sources that state that this individual has...

indicated in the article and indicates that he is presumed notable per WP:NACADEMICS. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:47, 13 September 2015 (UTC) The above discussion...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable author/academic. Fails WP:GNG as well as WP:NACADEMICS and WP:AUTHOR. Couldn't find any third-party sources at all. —  crh 23  (Talk)...

discussions. CeltJungleSnake (talk) 07:14, 15 May 2021 (UTC) Strong Keep WP:NACADEMIC#6 states The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative...

to try to establish WP:VERIFY but have had no luck. After reading WP:NACADEMICS I do not believe this article fits the criteria (significance) necessary...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article claims that Harvey meets WP:NACADEMICS criterion 4. I was unable to verify that these textbooks had the impact...

Keep under crtiera 6 of NACADEMIC per EAWH's reasoning. MarginalCost (talk) 21:05, 22 March 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NACADEMIC criteria 6 and the addition...

professor, no publications (yet?) according to his own CV, not notable per WP:NACADEMICS. bender235 (talk) 16:16, 21 October 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

Speedy keep. Fellow is the highest level of membership in the IEEE, and WP:NACADEMIC even uses it as an example of what can satisfy criterion #3. Clarityfiend...

America1000 01:22, 28 November 2016 (UTC) Delete - Can't see how they meet WP:NACADEMICS, while he's written several papers, the highest citation count is 3. Onel5969...

with the paid editing one bit, but he does have a named chair and WP:NACADEMICS is specific in saying that that is enough for notability. DiscantX (talk)...

Maproom (talk) 06:33, 30 March 2016 (UTC) Strong keep - clearly meets WP:NACADEMICS "The most typical way of satisfying Criterion 1 is to show that the academic...

fast, LibStar--apparently they occupy a named chair; see item 5 at WP:NACADEMICS. Drmies (talk) 00:41, 19 June 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

including in the best scientific journals, pointing to point 1 of WP:NACADEMICS, however, I have noticed several of the best references in the list do...

fails notability criteria: WP:BASIC and if we go to SNG - also fails WP:NACADEMICS, WP:JOURNALIST, WP:AUTHOR. Less Unless (talk) 14:24, 5 January 2020 (UTC)...

newspaper, a faculty colleague and, erm, himself. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMICS. Sionk (talk) 23:20, 19 June 2018 (UTC) Nomination withdrawn, he's chair...

respect to the GNG and a SNG like NACADEMIC. In other words, a valid claim of GNG notability renders consideration of NACADEMIC moot. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:23, 8...

JSTOR · TWL) Article at first glance appears to be copyvio, -fails WP:NACADEMICS and WP:GNG. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 23:36, 16 January 2015 (UTC) And, just...

17 April 2016 (UTC) Speedy Keep For a start, meets criterion #5 of WP:NACADEMICS - "Academics/professors meeting any one of the following conditions, as...

Gbooks or Gscholar. PROD removed by Necrothesp who pointed to WP:NACADEMIC #6 but NACADEMIC talks about " a highest-level elected or appointed administrative...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails to meet any of the criteria in WP:NACADEMICS. Not notable and no coverage by secondary sources. Further, article is...

(UTC) Keep. He was a Distinguished Professor, which clearly meets WP:NACADEMICS #5. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:25, 15 April 2015 (UTC) Speedy Keep. Distinguished...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMIC and undersourced in tone. Sheldybett (talk) 16:37, 9 June 2019 (UTC) Note:...

by NACADEMIC, so they don't count towards notability at all. There's an Amit M. Patel on Google Scholar [3] who some might argue passes NACADEMIC C1,...

[4] [5]. Everymorning (talk) 23:06, 7 August 2016 (UTC) Keep Meets wp:NACADEMICS - has two articles with over 700 cites, and many more with hundreds of...

and simple. Delta13C (talk) 16:03, 5 January 2016 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:NACADEMICS Vipinhari || talk 20:47, 5 January 2016 (UTC) Delete. Article gives no...

I'm nominating this because I do not believe it passes WP:GNG or WP:NACADEMIC. If others can find sources meeting those criteria, I'm happy to withdraw...

the other criteria, and he certainly doesn't meet any criteria of WP:NACADEMICS. North of Eden (talk) 21:27, 2 August 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

it seems fairly close in spirit, if not in word, to criterion 8 of WP:NACADEMICS: "The person is or has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established...

Amended, see below Kraxler (talk) 01:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC) passes WP:NACADEMICS # 6, which says "The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed...

Thanks, Daniel (talk) 01:32, 27 July 2021 (UTC) Keep Per above meets WP:NACADEMICS. Although, article needs further improvements though. Jaysonsands (talk)...

sigcov could be found either in the article or through own search. WP:NACADEMICS is not met either. FortunateSons (talk) 10:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC) Note:...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article on a scientist with no evidence of meeting WP:NACADEMICS e.g. not a professor, no major awards, etc. No reliable 3rd party references...

JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NACADEMIC (see, e.g., [1]). – Ploni (talk) 23:47, 21 June 2022 (UTC) Delete; fails WP:NACADEMIC by all counts, as peer citations...

Shellwood (talk) 23:21, 25 May 2022 (UTC) Comment: In general, he'd meet WP:NACADEMIC criterion 6, as long as we consider Wayne University a 'major' institution...

Pakistan's science advisory council. I don't believe that sufficies for WP:NACADEMICS. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 22:39, 20 March 2020 (UTC) The above discussion...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Cannot see how this meets WP:NACADEMIC. Edwardx (talk) 16:15, 9 August 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

Copenhagen and thus meets WP:NACADEMICS No. 6 5. Weird nomination. -- Sam Sing! 15:19, 31 January 2015 (UTC) Regarding NACADEMICS criteria 6. The person has...

Keep: Verifiably a WP:NACADEMIC#3 pass as an IEEE Fellow and a AAAS Fellow, as well as reasonable cases for NACADEMIC#1 and NACADEMIC#5 as mentioned by DE...

WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMICS. Kraxler (talk) 02:48, 29 August 2015 (UTC) Delete — Coverage from an alumni magazine doesn't assert WP:NACADEMICS. Toffanin (talk)...

sources to verify or sustain an article. Fails general notability, WP:NACADEMICS and WP:BASIC. Not highly cited. Only an Assistant Professor. Jbh (talk)...

Dec 2011, this article is an orphan. Non notable IMO, doesn't meet WP:NACADEMICS Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 15 July 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

the author is making a claim as an academic, but absolutely fails WP:NACADEMICS. -Xpctr8 (talk) 12:55, 24 July 2014 (UTC) Delete. Blatant self-promotion...

is enough coverage to satisfy the "significant impact" criterion of WP:NACADEMICS (or WP:GNG). -- Notecardforfree (talk) 12:37, 26 June 2016 (UTC) The above...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMICS. Aside from a single article in The Guardian Nigeria, there is no significant...

establishes criteria for presumed notability for creative professionals WP:NACADEMIC establishes criteria for presumed notability for academics Multiple sources...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Autobiography that fails to show WP:NACADEMICS. Bazj (talk) 20:29, 13 March 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

School" does not currently qualify under the intersection of WP:NACADEMIC#5 and WP:NACADEMIC#6, it should so that time could be saved. In any event, Kaji-O'Grady...

notability. Despite concerted efforts to stretch the definitions of WP:NACADEMIC to declare this individual notable, I find rough consensus here that she...

of WP:GNG or WP:NACADEMICS. Don't agree with the assessment that being a professor at Yale qualifies. Per criteria #5 of WP:NACADEMICS, that simply isn't...

likely meet WP:NACADEMIC, 3, since the Academy is limited to 350 members. Jahaza (talk) 21:00, 10 November 2022 (UTC) Mild delete. WP:NACADEMIC doens't provide...

2021 (UTC) Speedy Keep. This is an entirely invalid nomination. Per WP:NACADEMIC, Academics meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated...

nothing highly cited (highest number of citations is four). Fails WP:NACADEMICS. Jbh (talk) 11:20, 6 April 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

keep: bad state of an article is not reason to delete. Subject meets wp:nacademics. HandsomeBoy (talk) 22:54, 25 December 2017 (UTC) Keep Passes WP:ACADEMIC...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Page does not appear to meet WP:NACADEMIC, all of the information outside Schooling and Career is featured in...

and suspecting he might meet WP:NACADEMIC, didn't file an AfD. Odds are cites will need made to demonstrate NACADEMIC criterion 1, but that should be...

article. Simply being a lecturer does not qualify the person under WP:NACADEMICS. Normally such articles are redirected to the band per WP:MUSICBIO, however...

Saqib (talk) 07:28, 20 July 2018 (UTC) Speedy keep: Passes multiple WP:NACADEMIC criteria: The person's research has had a significant impact in their...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMICS. His work has been mentioned in reliable sources, but not to the extent...

potential, but not adequately demonstrated or sourced, notability per WP:NACADEMICS. The only "references" here are his own self-published curriculum vitae...

TWL) The article does not SIGCOV for WP:GNG, WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO or WP:NACADEMIC. Sources in article and WP:BEFORE revealed no WP:IS WP:RS containing material...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMICS, WP:GNG ― Padenton|✉   21:26, 28 March 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No real notability. Fails WP:NACADEMICS and WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 08:31, 13 August 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate...

expertise, but as an Associate Professor in the US, this appears to fail WP:NACADEMIC. Edwardx (talk) 21:54, 9 May 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable PhD student, doesn't meet WP:NACADEMICS or WP:GNG Melcous (talk) 12:58, 7 March 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

pastor and religious scholar. Does not meet WP:BIO and does not meet WP:NACADEMICS. Tgeairn (talk) 00:58, 2 February 2015 (UTC) Delete - I found a couple...

Shellwood (talk) 13:37, 12 May 2021 (UTC) Keep. Easy NACADEMIC pass, trivially passing NACADEMIC-5 by being a named chair in Cornell University. Fairly...

JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG as little/no coverage of her work. Fails WP:NACADEMIC #4 is arguably failed due to the fact that there is hardly any evidence...

Comment for nom @Salvidrim!: FYI, determining notability for academics (WP:NACADEMICS) can be a little tricky. They can be highly notable or famed in their...

a list of papers and articles he's written. Fails both WP:BIO and WP:NACADEMICS. --Non-Dropframe talk 02:21, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Delete - fails to establish...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fail to meet WP:NACADEMICS notability criteria. Wide activities converging of being pseudoscientific...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Self-created article, no evidence of meeting WP:NACADEMICS Melcous (talk) 10:51, 5 July 2016 (UTC) Comment He is much more frequently...

recognition" does not exempt "distinguished professor" status from WP:NACADEMIC inclusion criteria. So, relist Please add new comments below this notice...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not seeing a passage of WP:NACADEMIC. ∯WBGconverse 06:12, 27 October 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

his academic work. But I don't see how he comes close to satisfying WP:NACADEMICS. NewYorkActuary (talk) 17:51, 22 September 2015 (UTC) Delete: as insufficiently...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to meet WP:NACADEMICS or WP:BASIC. There is this article in The Hindu that provides significant...

only mentions online are simple references to authorship. Nothing in WP:NACADEMICS seems to apply. Star Garnet (talk) 05:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC) Keep,...

significant coverage by independent reliable sources. Also does not meet WP:NACADEMIC - Scopus shows that his scholarly authorship consists of 4 non-memo articles...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NACADEMIC. – Ploni (talk) 18:58, 17 May 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

principal focus of the documentary) and had a blog. Does not meet WP:NACADEMICS, or else her academic credentials establishing notability are not well...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not seem to hold against WP:NACADEMICS. Seems like a promising post-doc, but no noteworthy scientific honours...

mainspace with the edit summary "satisfies WP:NACADEMIC C#5 with distinguished professorship". Not so; NACADEMIC C#5 specifies "a distinguished professor appointment...

JSTOR · TWL) Undisclosed paid editing. Seems to not meet WP:GNG or WP:NACADEMIC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vortex3427 (talk • contribs) 02:22...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of notability per GNG or WP:NACADEMIC.(note 'keep' !vote below) No significant coverage (of the subject) in...

Unless the article's subject has suddenly met one of the criteria in WP:NACADEMICS since this article was nominated for deletion I can't see how the notability...

find enough to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NACADEMIC. Being a principal investigator isn't sufficient to satisfy WP:NACADEMIC, particularly for a non-major project...

‎ The result was speedy keep. As per WP:NAUTHOR (1, 3) as well as WP:NACADEMIC (1, 2) and other reasons listed below. (non-admin closure) LearnIndology...

publications and contribution to a documentary, fails all 9 elements of WP:NACADEMICS. The Dissident Aggressor 18:18, 13 October 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate...

the shogi. About academics, I think that the publications may meet WP:NACADEMICS #C1, significant impact. Rather than the number it is the quality of the...

very poor quality of the translation, the subject does not satisfy WP:NACADEMICS. PROD declined without explanation by article creator. Safiel (talk) 14:49...

aware, this doesn't pass WP:NACADEMIC. Govvy (talk) 13:50, 16 October 2025 (UTC) Delete - At best, he could pass NACADEMIC under point 6 (The person has...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMICS. Better for CV but not for WP. Greenbörg (talk) 15:14, 10 October 2017...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Cannot find anything to pass WP:GNG or WP:NACADEMIC. nearlyevil665 12:03, 15 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMIC and/or WP:GNG. ∯WBGconverse 15:37, 29 June 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

large number of low-quality ones). However, the subject clearly passes WP:NACADEMIC(1) - per google scholar (not you need to search without the diacritic...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:BIO nor WP:NACADEMICS. Tgeairn (talk) 22:56, 10 January 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:NACADEMICS OluwaCurtis »» (talk to me) 09:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC) Note: duplicate...

interest, of a political scientist with no strong claim to passing WP:NACADEMICS. The referencing here is entirely to primary sources -- his own staff...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMIC Collaboratio (talk) 12:14, 6 August 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

Fulbright Fellowship is a pretty major award. It satisfies WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMICS. I am less sure about the other two awards. But the Fulbright is sufficient...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) does not seem to meet WP:NACADEMICS - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 03:03, 29 October 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NACADEMIC. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:45, 13 October 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't appear to pass WP:NACADEMICS. No reliable sources have been provided. Moreover, the article is likely...

anything in here that makes him notable. What do we use for geologists? WP:NACADEMICS? Doesn't meet that IMO Gbawden (talk) 10:10, 6 August 2014 (UTC) Note:...

professor of informatics at Umeå University form 1984 to 2002, thus meets WP:NACADEMIC #5. Evidently the article was written by someone with good knowledge about...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 26 May 2015 (UTC) Keep - Passes WP:NACADEMIC/WP:GNG. Chair of the Department of Sexual Medicine at the Institute for...

fellows (added 20 out of 572) of the society. Noted all entries passes WP:NACADEMIC point 3 which will passes WP:NLIST. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 15:46...

JSTOR · TWL) Seems an unexceptional doctor. Likely fails WP:BIO and WP:NACADEMIC. Edwardx (talk) 00:13, 3 August 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

January 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NACADEMIC toobigtokale (talk) 00:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC) Speedy keep, WP:NACADEMICS#2, WP:NEXIST, WP:BASICS and WP:HEY...

is not a reason to delete a page that has presumed notability under WP:NACADEMIC. It is also not an accurate description of this page, since both sources...

improvements. The references provide simply establish he exists. Fails WP:NACADEMICS and WP:GNG. Dan arndt (talk) 15:15, 13 September 2015 (UTC) Dan arndt...

13 April 2021 (UTC) Delete, does not meet notability requirements of NACADEMIC and does not have SIGCOV.--Chuka Chieftalk 14:28, 18 April 2021 (UTC)...

(UTC) Delete - No evidence that this passes WP:NAUTHOR, never mind WP:NACADEMICS. Thus falls to WP:NBASIC which, again, the sources appear to not reach...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NACADEMIC, and irredeemably résumé-like. – Ploni (talk) 23:58, 21 June 2022 (UTC)...

WP:CREATIVE notability; nor does the subject's working life meet the WP:NACADEMICS criteria. AllyD (talk) 20:13, 23 October 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate...

secondary sources. Fails WP:BLPNOTE and does not meet criteria for WP:NACADEMICS. Flat Out let's discuss it 00:31, 4 March 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NACADEMIC is not met with. Notability is not inherited either. TrangaBellam (talk)...

a professor at Jammu University,[1] but I doubt that qualifies for WP:NACADEMICS #5, and searches suggest that English-language sources required to meet...

‎ The result was keep. Per the consensus, subject appears to meet WP:NACADEMIC. (non-admin closure) Ahecht (TALK PAGE) 20:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC) Miloslav...

Contributions) 10:09, 13 July 2018 (UTC) Delete on account of subject failing WP:NACADEMIC and WP:JOURNALIST. -The Gnome (talk) 10:11, 13 July 2018 (UTC) Delete...

this article does not make any claim that would make its subject pass WP:NACADEMIC - yes, he has won awards, but they are all on university level with the...

been significantly acclaimed, thereby failing WP:AUTHOR. According to WP:NACADEMICS, she'd have to make a big contribution to her area of study, (hasn't happened)...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This academic fails WP:NACADEMICS Mrfrobinson (talk) 00:26, 5 February 2014 (UTC) Speedy per A7: There's...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:NACADEMIC; Google scholar link broken and no entry found by searching; books fail...

Schmidt, Michael Q. 22:41, 24 November 2014 (UTC) AND with such as WP:NACADEMICS, we do not need the SIGCOV of a pop star. Schmidt, Michael Q. 22:44, 24...

(talk) 21:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC) Keep - Meets WP:SCHOLAR as per WP:NACADEMICS point 5 (named chair at major institution). WP:PROMOTIONAL tone can be...

level of WP:NACADEMIC. Western sheriff (talk) 22:15, 9 March 2024 (UTC) This editor is a WP:SPA. There is a not a single criteria in NACADEMIC that the subject...

04:10, 3 October 2015 (UTC) this person doesn't meet any criteria of WP:NACADEMICS. LibStar (talk) 05:01, 3 October 2015 (UTC) Her work has been peer-reviewed...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMIC Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 06:46, 7 September 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

he's a professor. 'Professor' passes A7. But does this professor pass WP:NACADEMICS? I can't see anything much in terms of independent reliable sources. The...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Consensus is that NACADEMIC is met. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:02, 16 July 2018 (UTC)...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails every point of WP:NACADEMIC. No independent coverage found. schetm (talk) 02:12, 28 October 2020 (UTC)...

(UTC) Keep (as long as the article is not created by a sockpuppet) per WP:NACADEMICS. As a university president, the subject meets "The person has held a highest-level...

field and reception of her work and research. Passes by way of WP:NACADEMIC #2, WP:NACADEMIC #3. WP:PROF#C1. May be worth investigating variations of her name...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet any of the criteria at WP:NACADEMICS  White Whirlwind  咨  17:47, 30 March 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

WP:DINC. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 20:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC) Keep Meets WP:NACADEMICS points two, three, and five. Point one would be satisfied if independent...

(talk) 11:57, 5 September 2021 (UTC) Keep. Likely passes WP:NAUTHOR or WP:NACADEMIC based on his faculty bio at Regis University where he is the current Assistant...

Fails WP:ANYBIO and citations provided are primary. Also doesn't meet WP:NACADEMIC. Itcouldbepossible Talk 04:41, 15 June 2022 (UTC) Delete there is no indication...

helps substantially. The subject doesn't meet GNG, and it doesn't meet WP:NACADEMIC either. ─ The Aafī (talk) 15:16, 9 July 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

like a CV than a biography of encyclopedic nature. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMICS. Greenbörg (talk) 14:55, 10 October 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NACADEMIC criteria Domdeparis (talk) 17:04, 18 November 2016 (UTC) Keep As the holder...

there is no independent in-depth coverage for him. He fails WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMICS. Greenbörg (talk) 08:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

article), which falls short of WP:NACADEMIC. I don't see any other evidence in the article or online that she meets WP:NACADEMIC or WP:GNG. Based on this source...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG as well as WP:NACADEMIC. Her (self-written) CV is a few miles away from even being remotely impressive...

subject. It appears that the subject comfortably meets criteria 1 of WP:NACADEMIC. Cirton (talk) 12:32, 15 May 2022 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...

January 2023 (UTC) Keep. Holds a named chair (meets WP:NACADEMIC#5), highly cited (meets WP:NACADEMIC-#1). Several of his publications have citations running...

JSTOR · TWL) Person does not appear to meet notability requirements per WP:NACADEMICS nor WP:GNG. Only reference in article is based on a press release from...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMICS. No indication that his research has "made significant impact in their...

person is notable. The article fulfills none of the requirements of WP:NACADEMICS. The article was created from a editor who was not logged in. Most of...

bringing it here. It does not look to me that he meets WP:ANYBIO, WP:NACADEMICS, or WP:AUTHOR. Meters (talk) 22:36, 22 May 2016 (UTC) Note that there...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence that this subject passes WP:NACADEMIC, WP:NPOL or WP:GNG and a cursory search does not reveal useful sources...

that discuss the subject in any detail. Fails WP:BIO, WP:SCHOLAR, and WP:NACADEMICS. - MrX 01:12, 11 January 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

research has been independently noted to the required level; fails WP:NACADEMICS. AllyD (talk) 06:41, 15 June 2014 (UTC) Delete Way too early. Non-notable...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't quite seem to meet any of the points of WP:NACADEMIC. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 13:17, 31 August 2016 (UTC) I'm withdrawing...

the vice-president of a redlinked University, meaning he also fails WP:NACADEMICS. In a way, this is more of a promotional page/resume (he "received education...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject does not pass WP:GNG pr WP:NACADEMIC. A Web of Science (standard metric) search returned 13 papers with few...

notability criteria - Wikipedia is not "LinkedIn". Doesn't meet WP:AUTHOR, WP:NACADEMIC, WP:GNG, etc. I was not able to find multiple reliable independent sources...

per WP:NACADEMIC. Yes not an Athlete but an academic. JK.Kite (talk) 15:24, 28 May 2021 (UTC) JK.Kite just curious, which criterion of WP:NACADEMIC do you...

reliable publications" that's the WP:GNG, but he only needs to meet WP:NACADEMICS. I argue that he meets #1 based on pioneering work on concepts including...

passes WP:NACADEMIC. See this Google Scholar search. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:36, 28 April 2019 (UTC) If the subject passes WP:NACADEMIC then that...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not clear that the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:NACADEMIC. The sources in the article do not demonstrate significant coverage. This...

WP:PROMO. Johnbod (talk) 17:17, 16 July 2020 (UTC) Keep satisfies WP:NACADEMIC C6, which supersedes GNG: The person has held a highest-level elected...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMICS. Was nominated for deletion in 2008, but reached no consensus. Does not...

TWL) Unexplained PROD removal by article creator, here we are. Fails WP:NACADEMIC; WP:GNG, only potentially significant role held was acting vice-chancellor...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to meet WP:NACADEMIC. In the two sources provided, he is only briefly mentioned in the first...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NACADEMIC, the article lacks in secondary literature referring to Bjørklund. This...

enough to satisfy WP:NACADEMIC, nor does she meet the GNG herself. --Paul_012 (talk) 04:44, 18 January 2018 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NACADEMIC. CASSIOPEIA(talk)...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article gives no indication that the subject passes WP:NACADEMIC. According to Google Scholar, the subject has a total of 18 citations...

all that's left is an associate assistant professorship which fails WP:NACADEMIC. Cabayi (talk) 07:16, 2 August 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of meeting WP:ANYBIO, or WP:NACADEMIC. Just another in a long history of WP:PROMO associated with the prep school...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMIC. Low to no citations on his academic work, and no independent coverage...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:33, 28 April 2025 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:NACADEMICS or WP:GNG. Insufficient coverages found to establish notability of any...

was keep. No consensus to delete, and a consensus that it meets s WP:NACADEMIC #6; the additional issues regarding sourcing can be handled outside of...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:ANYBIO. 57 citations does not meet #1. I am not sure that being...

(highest is 35). Can't see where he meets any of the other criteria of WP:NACADEMIC, and definitely doesn't meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 19:26, 24 October...

needs to have more coverage and in-depth articles about it. Fails WP:NACADEMICS. Samanthany (talk) 00:30, 9 June 2022 (UTC) Keep. Appears to meet WP:AUTHOR;...

withdrawn. Thanks for the feedback. I'll be more careful to examine WP:NACADEMIC in future, (non-admin closure) Triptothecottage (talk) 21:44, 14 February...

article deleted, as per WP:FAILN, have not been satisfied. According to WP:NACADEMICS, since the subject of the article meets the criterion of 1. The person's...

and not an academic journal, so the subject does not qualify under WP:NACADEMIC #8. MarkH21 (talk) 19:03, 4 February 2019 (UTC) Keep Architectural Review...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject appears to fail to meet WP:NACADEMICS, as discussed with the article's creator and others at User:Jcstanley/my...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMIC, WP:NPEOPLE and WP:GNG. Is an WP:AUTOBIO. Possibly consider deleting creator's...

"directors"). I do not see enough material for this article to pass WP:NACADEMICS. KDS4444Talk 19:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

sources, please add them to the article). As it stands, fails WP:GNG / WP:NACADEMIC. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:18, 2 March 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

Talk 14:34, 9 September 2015 (UTC) Keep passes several criteria, like WP:NACADEMICS # 6 (was president of of a major university) and WP:NPOL # 1 (was a member...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Self-created article, subject does not meet WP:NACADEMICS or WP:NAUTHOR. PROD removed by a second author whose editing also suggests...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. Potentially notable. scope_creepTalk 15:37, 23...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable scholar. Fails WP:NACADEMICS. In particular, the impact his work has had on his scholarly discipline...

nominating for AfD. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:39, 30 May 2022 (UTC). Keep. Meets WP:NACADEMIC #5, having been appointed the Kwame Nkrumah Chair in African Studies at...

search of JSTOR and Google scholar returns nothing, so he clearly fails WP:NACADEMICS. There has also been no coverage of him in independent, reliable sources...

coverage, suggesting subject fails WP:BASIC/WP:GNG. No criterion in WP:NACADEMICS is met. Article was PRODed and dePRODed. Sam Sailor 07:48, 27 June 2018...

source coverage, supporting a claim of notability that would satisfy WP:NACADEMICS, for him to earn inclusion here. There's also a likely WP:COI, as the...

thing he's supposedly notable for (and are definitely not enough for WP:NACADEMICS). This leaves only the two Kotaku articles as anything close to establishing...

notability. This is a person who passes multiple criterion. He passes WP:NACADEMIC #6 having been former vice chancellor of one of top Nigerian universities...

I don't think he meets NACADEMIC or GNG. There's almost no secondary coverage and he doesn't meet any of the obvious NACADEMIC criteria, no named professorship...

articles about awards that appear to fall short of what is required by WP:NACADEMIC. One of the links, to the Mathematics Genealogy Project, isn't even about...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails to satisfy the criteria under WP:NACADEMIC. It has been identified as needing improvement since 2015 with no substantial...

archives. Some certainly meet WP:ANYBIO (like Pierre-Georges Roy) or WP:NACADEMIC (like Sarah Tyacke). I can't see any achievements of Jeff James (public...

Onel5969 TT me 20:49, 25 July 2017 (UTC) Delete - nothing suggests that WP:NACADEMIC notability criteria are met.--Rpclod (talk) 01:10, 26 July 2017 (UTC)...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Seems to fail WP:NACADEMIC. The PhD is not enough for notability. It is not clear if the invention...

owner:Online 03:27, 20 February 2020 (UTC) Weak Keep Seems to pass WP:NACADEMIC #5 (see [1] as a better explainer of his career than the article). Not...

discussions. schetm (talk) 02:53, 7 October 2021 (UTC) Keep. He passes WP:NACADEMIC#6; he was President of Southern Utah University. Additionally, WP:CLERGY...

subject meets WP:PROF#C5, which is sufficient to meet notability per WP:NACADEMIC (non-admin closure) Britishfinance (talk) 14:54, 21 November 2019 (UTC)...

Glen (talk) 21:09, 24 May 2018 (UTC) Speedy Keep - Clearly passes WP:NACADEMIC both from 1, The person's research has had a significant impact in their...

Scotland. EricEnfermero HOWDY! 07:05, 22 November 2014 (UTC) Keep - Meets WP:NACADEMICS, criteria #1 (has described 100s of fungal species; several awards from...

Smallbones(smalltalk) 14:50, 5 May 2019 (UTC) Keep per Natureium and Smallbones. Passes NACADEMIC based on citations, awards, and impact. – bradv🍁 16:00, 5 May 2019 (UTC)...

any of the WP:NACADEMIC criteria, nor biographical coverage for WP:GNG. Citations are decent (?) but I don't think it's enough for NACADEMIC#1. Note that...

result was keep. It doesn't look there's disagreement that she satisfies NACADEMIC #4, which is all she needs to warrant an article about her. Bbb23 (talk)...

speedy keep. Withdrawn nomination. Nominator (I.e. me) misunderstood NACADEMIC, and also forgot to check Google scholar. Trouts would be appropriate...

Google Scholar, and he doesn't seem to meet any of the criteria in WP:NACADEMICS. Ahecht (TALK PAGE) 22:44, 10 September 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE, and he is not remotely close to any kind of WP:NPROF/WP:NACADEMIC, as he is a mid-level researcher in a bigger team at the Institute (e...

examination, but perhaps that's better than nothing. My reading of WP:NACADEMIC would not allow notability through his position of Secretary at Coimbatore...

12:20, 25 November 2019 (UTC) comment @Scope creep:.. I think we use WP:NACADEMICS when we evaluate notability for professors. I did a quick check and I'm...

(talk) 02:04, 22 May 2022 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:PROF Keep Passes C8 of WP:NACADEMIC that automatically confers notability even without meeting WP:GNG. Surgical...

young age. That being said, the sources cited don't meet GNG, and as for NACADEMIC notability, I don't think his ICSM headship is enough to satisfy #6, or...

analysis refutes claims of NAUTHOR and there's no indication Berry passes NACADEMIC Star Mississippi 13:36, 30 April 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

her (trouble with WP:BLPSOURCES). Thus subject of the article fails WP:NACADEMICS since she has not won any national awards or particularly had a specific...

positions in different universities and also written books. Passes WP:NACADEMICS. Nika2020 (talk) 21:55, 18 June 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

UPE/COI editor. Onel5969 TT me 16:37, 25 February 2022 (UTC) Keep: Per WP:NACADEMIC criterion six. Head of a big university. 15 (talk) 11:12, 27 February...

Meets WP:NACADEMIC criterion #5 by holding a named chair at SFU. Jmertel23 (talk) 11:43, 7 March 2021 (UTC) Speedy keep. She meets WP:NACADEMIC criterion...

significant coverage about her. Reywas92Talk 01:34, 11 June 2022 (UTC) Keep WP:NACADEMIC "Academics meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated...

own search. Extent of publications does not appear to be enough for WP:NACADEMIC. DanCherek (talk) 19:59, 22 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

indication that the subject's work is widely cited enough to meet WP:NACADEMIC, nor does there appear to be enough independent coverage in reliable sources...

under NACADEMIC is stronger than other SNGs, which may require GNG to also be demonstrated, or where it is presumed but rebuttable. NACADEMIC states:...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Deprodded article. Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMIC. A Google News search only turns up passing mentions and interviews if...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet the requirements of WP:NACADEMICS for (;;) (talk) 16:06, 1 July 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

fail to see how someone aged 20 could be a notable historian. Fails WP:NACADEMIC. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx (talk) 10:50, 8 May...

(talk) 10:53, 15 May 2015 (UTC) Delete as subject fails both WP:BIO and WP:NACADEMICS. --Non-Dropframe talk 11:38, 15 May 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

as the subject and in detail. Regarding NACADEMIC, I would like to point out that, in its own words, NACADEMIC is an alternative to GNG. An academic need...

herself. Runner-ups at this and that dissertation awards does not meet WP:NACADEMICS and there is nothing to indicate that her publications are highly-cited...

Sandstein 08:41, 14 July 2018 (UTC) Keep on account of subject passing WP:NACADEMIC #6, as former dean of the New York University School of Professional Studies...

teacher. Dimadick (talk) 13:17, 5 January 2016 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NACADEMICS and WP:GNG .Through I Agree with Dimadick he works in Farook College which...

concur does not meet NACADEMIC nor GNG.--Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 07:26, 6 July 2020 (UTC) Delete, Not a notable poet, fails WP:NACADEMIC , Alex-h (talk)...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to meet WP:NACADEMIC or WP:NBIO. Poorly sourced BLP, not finding significant coverage in additional...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMIC and seems to be promotional. Does not cite any sources, and relies on...

their FAHA status will automatically be reinstated." If it were truly an NACADEMICS C3 fellowship, it would be strange to say, "Here's this lifetime achievement...

Being a professor and VC at a national university, he likely passes WP:NACADEMIC, which supercedes GNG. Also, someone should look into nominater's contributions...

Sinologist". Onel5969 TT me 19:25, 10 November 2017 (UTC) Keep. Passes WP:NACADEMIC and WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 20:31, 10 November 2017 (UTC) Keep for the...

& National Academy of Science, India [FNASc]." This would ring the WP:NACADEMICS bell (see #3). Unfortunately the sources as cited are so confusing as...

Sandstein 18:21, 21 June 2018 (UTC) Delete for subject failing WP:GNG, WP:NACADEMIC, and WP:NAUTHOR. An economist who's a member of the AEA, also serving...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Effectively an unsourced BLP. Subject fails WP:NACADEMIC for mathematical contributions (no more than a two dozen or so citations...

(talk) 09:35, 28 July 2015 (UTC) Delete - does not appear to meet WP:NACADEMICS criteria.--Rpclod (talk) 02:23, 23 July 2015 (UTC) Comment The same user...

JSTOR · TWL) Cannot see that this paleontologist and academic meets WP:NACADEMIC. Cannot find WP:SIGCOV. Tacyarg (talk) 23:26, 5 June 2019 (UTC) Note:...

patra (talk) 07:30, 27 March 2015 (UTC) Delete doesn't show to meet WP:NACADEMICS Other infos like here or here or here also don't indicate notability....

Keep. Appears to pass WP:NACADEMIC #1 and #8. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:22, 14 July 2021 (UTC) weak Keep. passes WP:NACADEMIC #8 but probably not #1. --hroest...

passes WP:NACADEMIC #2 for being recipient of Commander of the Order of the British Empire, a prestigious national honor. Third, passes WP:NACADEMIC #6 for...

‎ The result was delete. The main policy argument for keeping was WP:NACADEMIC bullet #3. This requires that "The person has been an elected member of...

Just to be clear, the subject does not come anywhere near meeting WP:NACADEMIC. As head of the organisation he works for... I'm not sure the organisation...

They always pass WP:NACADEMIC. HandsomeBoy (talk) 22:36, 25 December 2017 (UTC) Keep this is speedy keep actually. Passes WP:NACADEMIC #6, Vice chancellor...

WP:BASIC and WP:NACADEMICS. The scholar search linked above shows several papers with scores of citations, which to me meets NACADEMICS #1. The existence...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails Wikipedia:NACADEMICS. No sources, did WP:BEFORE and was unable to find anything, looked at...

Psychiatry NBeale (talk) 15:31, 20 January 2015 (UTC) Weak keep per WP:NACADEMICS. Previous listing in American Men and Women of Science (= reference on...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject fails WP:GNG and as a school it fails WP:NACADEMIC Jamzy4 (talk) 20:27, 7 October 2016 (UTC) Keep. Included in the list of...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:GNG. The claim of "substantial impact" (NACADEMIC #1) is made in footnote 7. I have access to...

in [his] scholarly discipline, broadly construed", meaning he meets WP:NACADEMIC crit. #1, and one could argue that he also meets the GNG and/or WP:NAUTHOR...

March 2022 (UTC) Delete per the requirements of both WP:NMUSICIAN and WP:NACADEMIC. As a musician, it appears that he is the namesake of an annual guitar...

the subject fails WP:NACADEMIC. Such a large number of citations is only to be expected of notable academics who pass WP:NACADEMIC#C1. The circumstances...

mentions. The subject is a successful engineer, but falls short of the WP:NACADEMIC criteria with relatively low citation stats for his optics publications...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of significance or success that meets WP:NACADEMIC (a range of little-cited papers are listed at Scopus). No substantial...

well-cited publications, but I don't think we have enough to satisfy WP:NACADEMIC. Like many biographies of academics, the citations available are bios...

Unreferenced biography of an academic who does not fit WP:GNG, WP:BIO, or WP:NACADEMIC criteria. Websearch did not produce any support for his notability. Onel5969...

DGG ( talk ) 22:13, 6 June 2021 (UTC) Keep. Meets the criterion of WP:NACADEMIC #5. Any chair at a European university in the 1950s (in the days before...

Keep - I've added a decent source. I feel this needs a review under WP:NACADEMIC criterion 1, and I also think he may pass criterion 7. I might disagree...

Scholar ([1]), both of which I believe should make him qualify under WP:NACADEMICS. There are articles more fleshed out at pt:Željko Loparić and at hr:Željko...

of future references. It fails all pertinent notability criteria: WP:NACADEMICS, WP:GNG - WP:BASIC. EBY (talk) 16:14, 27 October 2014 (UTC) Keep The article...

is an independent reliable source with substantial coverage. As for WP:NACADEMIC, three of his dictionaries have two or three citations each at Google...

ResearchGate page, Gill does not have the level of citations needed to meet WP:NACADEMIC. Searching online, I was unable to find any significant, independent coverage...

8 April 2022 (UTC) Speedy Keep - The article subject clearly meet WP:NACADEMIC criterion #3 as a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of...

either, only a few passing mentions. Also does not appear to meet WP:NACADEMIC (assuming Avamere is not major). —Ganesha811 (talk) 12:53, 15 October...

which is the case here. Also as lecturer, he didnt met 8 criteria of WP:NACADEMICS Ckfasdf (talk) 06:42, 5 September 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

guideline or policy). This scholar would at a cursory view appear to fail WP:NACADEMICS, for reasons 1 to 9 inclusive. I do note that Dr Zaidi is credited with...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG/WP:NACADEMIC. ∯WBGconverse 11:38, 18 December 2018 (UTC) Comment Does Wikipedia have...

March 2015 (UTC) Keep In addition to the dispositive arguments above, WP:NACADEMICS under Specific Criteria #2 mentions Guggenheim Fellowship.ch (talk) 16:22...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The subject is not eligible as notable per WP:NACADEMIC and WP:PROF. I could not find any significant publication, citation under...

recipients are notable, but I rather doubt all of them are so, per WP:NACADEMICS point 2. In sum, then, the subject is respected and has has some achievements...

Doesn't satisfy WP:GNG, certainly doesn't meet any of WP:SOLDIER, WP:NACADEMIC or WP:AUTHOR Mztourist (talk) 03:19, 26 January 2020 (UTC) Note: This...

adding more sources into the article. As a member of IEEE, subject passes NACADEMIC #3, also his work has been cited more than 4300 times as per Scholar citation...

this article meets neither the WP:BIO notability standards or the WP:NACADEMIC notability standards. Google search reveals only the subject's professional...

College's newspaper and magazine department" meet those two citeria? WP:NACADEMICS specifically mentions that "Lesser administrative posts (provost, dean...

discussions.Grey Wanderer (talk) 09:36, 22 July 2020 (UTC) Delete Fails wp:nacademic all 8 criteria. Judson may be called a university but it only has 1300...

Retrieved 2022-03-02. Keep: Meets WP:ANYBIO as a Padma Bhushan awardee and WP:NACADEMIC as recipient of the Turing Award, among other criteria. Article is not...

independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:NACADEMIC - Google Scholar shows paper cited by 13, 8, 4. Edwardx (talk) 00:33,...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable under WP:NACADEMICS. Searches reveal little other than the fact that he is a professor and...

Moorlock (talk) 04:05, 31 October 2019 (UTC) Could a specialist in WP:NACADEMIC take a look at this - I think this might be a historical example of NPROF...

tried to find more sources per WP:BEFORE, and article appears to fail WP:NACADEMIC and WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 18:23, 22 June 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate...

Has not received SIGCOV in RS. I also do not think the subject meets WP:NACADEMIC, though they hold the post of Clinician Teacher at the Department of Ophthalmology...

himself. Seasider91 (talk) 19:52, 26 December 2015 (UTC) Delete: fails WP:NACADEMIC, self published CV. Melcous (talk) 21:39, 26 December 2015 (UTC) Delete...

No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. NACADEMIC/NPROF appear to be met. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:45, 26...

let alone demonstrate that they've had "significant impact" as per WP:NACADEMIC. Clearly not notable in the field. — Preceding unsigned comment added...

Scholar, the subject has an h-index of 1, which is not enough to meet WP:NACADEMIC. Given that the subject appears to have worked in a rather niche field...

article has far better citation count [3] She fails all the criteria of WP:NACADEMICS, and as there is little independent coverage of her, she also fails WP:GNG...

and WP:NACADEMIC KidAd (talk) 00:40, 5 April 2020 (UTC) Delete. Firstly the subject comes nowhere near passing any of the criteria of WP:NACADEMIC, so I...

academic articles and complaints about his treatment in Russia WP. WP:NACADEMIC is actually the way to go here because he apparently only sings as a side...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Clearly fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:GNG. Not finding any independent in-depth coverage in reliable...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was SNOW Keep. Easily meets WP:NACADEMIC. (non-admin closure) Jdcomix (talk) 13:44, 24 August 2017 (UTC) Daniel...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable, fails WP:NACADEMIC and not notable for her govermental work Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 14 December...

Near-unanimous consensus that the article subject meets multiple WP:NACADEMIC criteria. (non-admin closure) Leviv ich 17:50, 18 May 2019 (UTC) AfDs...

Andrew S. Grove Award, and IEEE J. J. Ebers Award are notable and meet WP:NACADEMIC, point #2. Plummer's election as fellow of the American Academy of Arts...

TWL) Article subject does not appear to be notable under WP:GNG or WP:NACADEMIC. Additionally the article's subject, pursuant to WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE has...

biochemist, Rose Crichton is currently a lab technician, and as such fails NACADEMIC, particularly criteria 5. As for criteria 1 of said guideline, she has...

certainly not under WP:NCORP neither as an adjunct professor under WP:NACADEMIC. Her list of awards must fill that wall nicely, but they don't help establish...

autobiography. It's largely self-promotional and does not appear to satisfy WP:NACADEMICS. Tchaliburton (talk) 03:30, 29 July 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

claiming here) or one of the subject-specific guidelines that include NACADEMIC; it's also not clear what "the article is poor in taste" refers to nor...

cite stuff as its in OL! I believe FinstP may also satisfy Wikipedia:NACADEMICS#3. An image should be available at some point due to his Fareham Mayoral...

sources are provided. Borock (talk) 20:40, 29 July 2015 (UTC) Keep per WP:NACADEMICS criterion #1. This is a tricky one, and just barely crosses the notability...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable academic. Fails GNG; WP:NACADEMIC. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:25, 13 December 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

professor and editor of a notable academic journal, and therefore passes WP:NACADEMIC. Some of his publications can be seen at this PUBMED search and at this...

discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:04, 24 October 2017 (UTC) WP:NACADEMIC: "The person holds or has held a... distinguished professor appointment...

notice. Thanks, SoWhy 06:33, 27 June 2017 (UTC) Keep Verifiably meets WP:NACADEMIC#3 as a Fellow of IEEE. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 08:06, 4 July 2017 (UTC)...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:BLP that fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:GNG, and reads as a CV/promotional piece. Of the five citations...

about where to draw the line, the article's subject seems to just meet WP:NACADEMIC. Miniapolis 00:44, 16 April 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

safe to say these can satisfy WP:NACADEMIC. HoneycrispApples (talk) 00:10, 13 May 2021 (UTC) Snow Keep per WP:NACADEMIC -- Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:57...

for the ping, ThaddeusB. I accepted this article because he meets WP:NACADEMICS under criteria #6, as the head of the Geriatrics Department (although...

article can not establish this it also does not meet the criteria for WP:NACADEMICS. BlitzGreg (talk) 23:15, 16 January 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep. Bad faith...

and WP:NACADEMIC - only an adjunct professor. Run-of-the-mill businesswoman. Edwardx (talk) 00:21, 14 September 2018 (UTC) Keep Passes WP:NACADEMIC#1 with...

notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 04:05, 20 August 2015 (UTC) Keep passes WP:NACADEMICS #3, was a member of IEEE which is cited as an example at the criterion...

meet WP:GNG, and can't see where he meets any of the requirements of WP:NACADEMIC. Initially, according to Google scholar, he has a citation count of "0"...

few independent sources about him. Does not meet the standards of WP:NACADEMIC as far as I can tell, and fails to meet WP:GNG as well Joseph2302 (talk)...

(talk) 04:17, 12 March 2021 (UTC) Delete. Does not appear to meet WP:NACADEMIC or another notability criterion. Being quoted in a local news source based...

institution. Larry Hockett (Talk) 04:43, 17 September 2019 (UTC) Keep Meets WP:NACADEMIC#5 "The person has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor...

demonstrate that she meets the basic criteria of WP:BIO. She also meets WP:NACADEMIC#7 as someone who has had "a substantial impact outside academia in their...

notability, bio reads like just another doctor. He doesn't meet any of WP:NACADEMICS. Non notable IMO Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 4 August 2014 (UTC) Hmm, what about...

subject appears not to meet any of the notabilty criteria laid down in WP:NACADEMIC, and no evidence is offered of him meeting WP:GNG. The only source cited...

satisfy any of the 9 criteria for WP:NACADEMIC, although that's not necessarily the end of the discussion. WP:NACADEMIC defers to WP:BIO if its criteria aren't...

Spider) 18:57, 19 October 2022 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NACADEMIC. He is vice-pro chancellor. NACADEMIC requires "highest-level elected or appointed administrative...

"Nur ate paddy as his daily food". As a scholar, he does not meet WP:NACADEMICS, and as a politician, he also does not meet WP:NPOL. Ckfasdf (talk) 15:04...

not currently meet guidelines for academic notability as outlined in WP:NACADEMICS. Fisheriesmgmt (talk) 01:42, 26 February 2015 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator:...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article fails to meet WP:GNG or the criteria in WP:NACADEMICS because it does not provide independant, reliable sources about Hossein...

2020 (UTC) Comment, the person was a dean. You don't think that meets WP:NACADEMIC? Same goes for the all the other ones. It seems like they all have been...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of satisfying WP:NACADEMIC. Mutt Lunker (talk) 11:50, 22 September 2019 (UTC) Am now content that...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMIC, WP:NAUTHOR, or WP:GNG. No evidence of established notability. Sources...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This simply fails WP:GNG or WP:NACADEMIC. Nothing from BEFORE to establish notability. Vanderwaalforces (talk)...

find any. Tried looking for additional sources to prove WP:GNG or WP:NACADEMIC. Couldn't find any. Doesn't look like this article meets our criteria...

whether Solusi University counts as a "major academic institution" under WP:NACADEMIC, but if it does then Maphosa is certainly notable under those criteria...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:NACADEMIC. Searches turned up nothing. Also potential COI. Etzedek24 (I'll talk...

only in the area of Louisville, Kentucky, does not pass WP:NPOL or WP:NACADEMIC. Aneirinn (talk) 20:10, 6 June 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails both WP:NACADEMICS and the WP:GNG – can't find any independent sources that mention Abse...

anything but promotion of his work, none of which meets the criteria for WP:NACADEMIC. Atsme📞📧 19:53, 27 December 2017 (UTC) Comment the article looking like...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMIC WikiMacaroonsCinnamon? 09:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of work with significant impact; fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:POET. – Ploni (talk) 19:08, 21 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

were differing over each other and doesn't make the article meet NPOL or NACADEMICS. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 01:18, 4 April 2024 (UTC) The above discussion...

WP:NACADEMIC#C3 to me. --JBL (talk) 01:33, 22 September 2020 (UTC) Speedy Keep membership in Austrian Academy of Sciences clearly meets WP:NACADEMIC#C3...

Provided sources do not demonstrate notability per WP:GNG, WP:NAUTHOR, WP:NACADEMIC. The subject is the founder and president of The Wynnewood Institute,...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NACADEMIC: Significant impact on field demonstrated by independent, reliable sources...

outside of Japan worth speaking of and this article fails to meet WP:NACADEMICS. Jun Kayama 07:48, 22 December 2015 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:GNG, no evidence that the subject meets WP:NACADEMIC. When nominating for PROD, Onel5969 said Her highest citation count is...

JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMIC, created by UPE sock. Did not find anything which can meet at least one criteria of the WP:NACADEMIC. KartikeyaS (talk) 15:17...

2016 (UTC). Keep. Appears to meet criteria 1, 2 and possibly 7 of WP:NACADEMICS while only needing to meet one of these. Supporting this, he is a published...

2025 (UTC) Keep: Being elected to the Royal Society Te Apārangi meets WP:NACADEMIC#3 Nil🥝 22:46, 30 September 2025 (UTC) @Nil NZ: He was elected to the...

deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:08, 26 May 2021 (UTC) Comment. WP:NACADEMIC #5: "The person has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor...

that the subject (this particular John Dwyer) satisfies WP:GNG or WP:NACADEMIC. There are almost no independent sources on the subject at all, while...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Reads like a CV, and I can't see that it passes WP:NACADEMIC. Specifically, the "Fellowships and honors" listed don't look like "highly...

Universit, suject passes NACADEMIC#6 notability requirement. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:30, 20 April 2019 (UTC) Thanks for your comment. NACADEMIC#6 says: The person...

find material that might be about him not James May. He might meet WP:NACADEMIC criterion 2 or 3, but it's not clear. --Scott Davis Talk 14:03, 3 January...

The Cambridge History of Inner Asia. He should easily qualify under WP:NACADEMICS #1. You just need to see how many Wikipedia pages are linked here to see...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail all 9 criteria of WP:NACADEMIC. Borderline promotional article as well. Toddst1 (talk) 19:57, 5 October...

become aware of, as well as disagreements over my interpretation of WP:NACADEMIC, which I do not plan on objecting to, I am withdrawing. (non-admin closure)...

(talk) 15:10, 20 April 2022 (UTC) Keep as notable; her FRSE satisfies WP:NACADEMIC #3, and her extra-academic contributions possibly also #7. (As an aside...

This certainly seems right on the edge, however, I believe this fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:GNG. While a BEFORE search of Google News finds voluminous hits...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMIC. Edwardx (talk) 19:41, 1 August 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

promote to these positions, therefore don't count towards meeting WP:NACADEMICS notability criteria. Being one of 52 signatories of a 1994 editorial doesn't...

(UTC) @Espresso Addict here the notability yardsticks are WP:NPROF/WP:NACADEMIC or WP:NAUTHOR. And, the entity is failing in both. Besides that, his h-index...

(UTC) Keep: An h-index of 60 is enough to establish notability under WP:NACADEMICS #1. 63.92.232.57 (talk) 21:19, 15 March 2015 (UTC) Weak keep. Enough highly-cited...

like the subject meets none of the additional criteria for biographies (NACADEMIC, an alternative criteria, comes the closest). GNG is not met here due...

John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:08, 19 October 2019 (UTC) Keep. Passes WP:NACADEMIC. He's the author of 59 peer reviewed journal articles in my university...

AfD submissions need to consider WP:NACADEMIC and other subject-specific notability guidelines. As WP:NACADEMICS says, "Many scientists, researchers,...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMICS, they have not won a major award, are not highly cited, are not a named...

subject has made a significant impact in his field, thus it meets WP:NACADEMICS#1. I don't see any very major issues in the article (not much promotional...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promotional article for subject that fails WP:NACADEMIC. – Ploni (talk) 15:52, 24 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

(talk) 21:40, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Delete - does not appear to meet any WP:NACADEMICS criteria.--Rpclod (talk) 05:15, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Delete I was the editor...

consensus. I believe that the article in fact fails criteria #1 of WP:NACADEMICS, in that the criteria states "The person's research has made significant...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMIC. I cannot find this professor through internet search. TheLonelyPather...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMICS; there's no evidence that the subject has had a significant impact in...

Thanks, MBisanz talk 18:29, 20 March 2021 (UTC) Keep For passing WP:NACADEMIC#6 and having 4k plus citations in Google Scholar.Chiro725 (talk) 23:49...

familiar confirm whether or not Paul R. Devin might be notable under WP:NACADEMIC or WP:JUDGE? I don't think he meets WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO, but we should...

court decisions, but these are all primary sources. Also does not meet WP:NACADEMIC No published papers or articles other than self-published books, and Scholar...

keeping is that WP:NACADEMIC assumes that full professors are notable. Several people disagree with this. My own reading of WP:NACADEMIC leads me to believe...

co-editors of an update to an existing glossary. I.e. falls short of WP:NACADEMICS and WP:NAUTHOR. Searches turns up nothing better. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds...

(talk) 16:05, 8 July 2020 (UTC) Comment. WP:NACADEMIC is plausible. Subject meets, at least, WP:NACADEMIC criteria 1,2,3 within his field. IACOBVS (talk)...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I do not believe that the subject is notable per WP:NACADEMIC Enwebb (talk) 18:45, 10 February 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:NACADEMIC. Run-of-the-mill person. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx...

(talk) 04:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC) Keep She is an IEEE fellow. Notable per WP:NACADEMICS#3. I agree that there is lack of media coverage but this is precisely...

already stated on the talkpage that the subject is notable as per WP:NACADEMICS. On that, I think the NOM is clearly wrong and the subject is not notable...

academic. This was actually created on WP:NPOL grounds rather than WP:NACADEMICS, as he was named last year to the Senate of Canada -- however, he subsequently...

Bearcat (talk) 16:14, 13 January 2019 (UTC) Strong Keep She meets WP:NACADEMIC #3 "The person is or has been an elected member of a highly selective...

be missing some), and it gives a low h-index (7/8) for the author. WP:NACADEMIC also specifically clarifies "Having an object (asteroid, process, manuscript...

doesn't make WP:FILMMAKER or WP:DIRECTOR. He doesn't appear to make WP:NACADEMIC and based on coverage alone arguably fails WP:GNG. It's probably WP:TOOSOON...

unreliable and on his profile pages which clearly fails to meet with WP:NACADEMIC, being a writer also nothing found to demonstrates notability per WP:CREATIVE...

31 May 2026 (UTC) Keep - Looks to me like subject of article meets WP:NACADEMIC. Receipt of Ordre de Palmes Academiques seems to meet criteria 2. It also...

but he wasn't a named chair or a distinguished professor so it fails WP:NACADEMIC 3. https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/50906/page/5769 - This is...

theology & theologists, this subject appears to meet Criterion 4 of WP:NACADEMIC; evidenced by the (relatively) large number of citations of his works...

independent sources. Does not appear to meet any notability requirements at WP:NACADEMIC. No evidence their work is highly cited. Does not meet WP:BIO either....

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Contested speedy deletion. Non-notable academic per WP:NACADEMICS. Spyder_Monkey (Talk) 20:18, 5 March 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

notability of this person. Fails WP:GNG and doesn't come close to passing WP:NACADEMIC. Onel5969 TT me 01:03, 27 October 2017 (UTC) Delete Not notable. A directory...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMICS. Zero results in Google News for his last name (well, technically a Youtube...

Telescope survey, but I don't think this survey is large enough to qualify WP:NACADEMIC #6. Currently an associate professor, so will perhaps have notability...

discussions.  Bait30  Talk? 03:20, 24 February 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NACADEMIC point 6. Presidents and founders of institutions of higher education have...

WP:GNG আফতাব (talk) 15:23, 7 April 2018 (UTC) Delete - does not support WP:NACADEMIC criteria.--Rpclod (talk) 17:29, 7 April 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...

including [6][7]. Has reviews for other works. If a case can't be made for WP:NACADEMIC (Professor but not named chair; 122+48+45 cites[8]), then meets NAUTHOR...

published. After that it kinda tails off. Whether that means he meets WP:NACADEMIC criterion #1 or not is unclear to me.Ajpolino (talk) 22:46, 23 January...

individuals with true academic/social achievement. In addition he passess WP:NACADEMIC #2 for Salvation Army Cross of the Order of Distinguished Auxiliary Service...

passes WP:ANYBIO #3. Number 2 and 3 –He passes WP:ANYBIO #1 as well as WP:NACADEMIC #2 as a holder of the Officer of the Order of the British Empire, a well...

clearly passes WP:NACADEMIC, WP:BIO and WP:GNG ultimately. King ChristLike (talk) 03:32, 6 August 2025 (UTC) Which criteria of WP:NACADEMIC does he meet?...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMIC. This is a stub of an article, with very little information and only a...

2020 (UTC) Keep. With a h-index of 48 (gooogle scholar) he passes WP:NACADEMIC(1). He possibly also passes other criteria or GNG.--Eostrix  (🦉 hoot...

TWL) Was deprodded without improvement, simply saying that they pass NACADEMIC. However, I'm not seeing how that is. Has been unsourced for years without...

The latter at Oxford certainly would qualify him for notability per WP:NACADEMICS #5 (as the majority of established chairs in the UK are not actually named)...

(UTC) Draft:Maya S. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:NACADEMIC? Possibly G11. --Владимир Бежкрабчжян (talk) 19:59, 6 December 2021 (UTC)...

Fails to meet the Wikipedia's notability guidelines for Academicians WP:NACADEMICS. WP:NOTRESUME Charlie (talk) 18:02, 3 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This...

Delete does not meet WP:NACADEMIC. microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 15:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC) Delete per nom fails WP:NACADEMIC.Pharaoh of the Wizards...

WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR. Note that being a FRAS is not in the same line as WP:NACADEMIC point 3 (particularly since they began taking student fellows). — MarkH21...

would appear to me - with WP:AGF glasses on - that this article fails WP:NACADEMIC or in the alternative WP:ANYBIO, WP:GNG and so on. It would appear to...

The subject also fails both criteria for WP:ANYBIO and all nine for WP:NACADEMICS. There are no guidelines for notability which the subject seems to pass...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to meet WP:NACADEMIC or WP:GNG. Hitro talk 06:57, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails NACADEMIC and GNG DarjeelingTea (talk) 06:21, 20 April 2017 (UTC) Delete. I can't...

TWL) Insufficient research impact within or without academia to meet WP:NACADEMIC. – Ploni (talk) 16:42, 30 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:BLP and WP:NACADEMIC all the main sources does not qualify as WP:RS others are just passing...

▾ contribs 15:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC) Delete no evidence he meets WP:NACADEMICS or WP:BIO. Article was apparently written by a family member, judging...

opinion myself.) Phil Bridger (talk) 17:37, 5 July 2019 (UTC) Keep Per WP:NACADEMIC. This person has invented a couple of techniques that have been confirmed...

of citations. --hroest 14:54, 5 June 2021 (UTC) Keep meets wikipedia:NACADEMIC. SportsOlympic (talk) 07:23, 5 June 2021 (UTC) Comment. I agree with hroest...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears not to meet WP:NACADEMIC or WP:CREATIVE. Insufficiently sourced, plus WP:COI issues. Ploni (talk)...

the American Association for the Advancement of Science is a pass of WP:NACADEMICS 3. Article should probably move after closure to William L. Thompson since...

JSTOR · TWL) Associate professor, no sources to indicate how he meets WP:NACADEMIC. Presumably he's mentioned in the cited book about NTFS, but that alone...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No in-depth coverage in WP:RS. Fails WP:NACADEMIC. Started by SPA User:Shaki997. Greenbörg (talk) 07:34, 21 October 2017...

article or elsewhere online - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:BIO and WP:NACADEMIC. Run-of-the-mill businesswoman. Appears rather promotional. Edwardx (talk)...

grounds due to him passing WP:NACADEMIC though. Nor do I think it necessary should be. Even if I mostly disagree WP:NACADEMIC myself. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:44...

NorthAmerica1000 08:03, 8 May 2014 (UTC) Comment I think he clears WP:NACADEMICS because he was vice-chancellor of Darul Uloom Deoband. Jyoti (talk) 05:13...

Thanks, North America1000 01:27, 8 April 2018 (UTC) Keep on account of WP:NACADEMIC, i.e. "The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative...

outlined in point 5 in WP:NACADEMIC. As the position is clearly not the highest, he also failed to satisfy point 6 in WP:NACADEMIC. Thank you. Delete Maybe...

third-party reliable sources for WP:BIO, insufficient sourcing for WP:NACADEMIC. Prod was disputed. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:29, 14 October 2022 (UTC) Note:...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This autobiography fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:BIO. There is almost no significant coverage of the subject in...

academic writer and widely cited. He's notable per criteria #1 of WP:NACADEMIC. --A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 03:58, 12 July 2023 (UTC) I...

His company might be notable but still depends. He clearly fails WP:NACADEMIC. WP is not for profiling purposes or promotional platform. His career...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears not to meet WP:NACADEMIC (see [1]). Wikipedia is not the place to post your résumé. – Ploni (talk)...

Google Scholar that the subject passes, for example, criterion 1 of WP:NACADEMIC. On the other hand, he does have a respectable number of citations and...

page.‎ The result was delete. The arguments to keep this are based on WP:NACADEMIC, which individuals can meet either if their work has had significant impact...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:GNG. All provided sources (except perhaps NZHerald, which is directly...

figures for voting: they are only indicators of significance under WP:NACADEMICS#1. Esquivalience t 23:18, 20 March 2015 (UTC) Keep -- His CV (cited as...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACADEMIC, WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. DrStrauss talk 20:13, 31 July 2017 (UTC) Note:...

BEFORE search did not reveal enough to meet WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST nor WP:NACADEMIC - what is needed are reviews in notable journals, magazines or newspapers...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject fails WP:NACADEMICS--has no significant claim in his field. In terms of WP:GNG, a few passing...